Choosing block size for RAID 0 & Final Cut

Hi.
I now have 3 500GB internal Seagate drives in bays 2/3/4 and want to make a striped 1.5TB RAID to use with Final Cut Studio 2. The help page talks about choosing a "large" data block size for use with video, but makes no specific size suggestion. What value would you recommend that I select for the block size? I haven't been in there yet so I don't know what the choices are.
Any other settings I should be aware of that will optimize the RAID performance for video capture and editing? Thanks!
Fred
Message was edited by: FredGarvin
Message was edited by: FredGarvin

If you're using Disc Utility to set up your RAID, when you go to the RAID tab, you'll see an options button near the bottom of the window... clicking this will open a small menu where you can set the data block size... the largest is 256K, which is what you'd want to use.
As for you're other question... have a look at this website: http://bytepile.com/raid_class.php
note that disc utility can only set up RAID 0 & RAID 1 (if i remember rightly).

Similar Messages

  • Recommended Block Size For RAID 0

    I am setting up a RAID configuration (Striping, no Parity, Mac G5, OS-X) and was curious what the recommended Block Size should be. Content is primarily (but not limited to) Images created with Adobe Photoshop CS2 and range in size from 1.5MB to >20MB. The default for OS-X is 32K chunks of data.
    Drives are External FW-400.
    Many thanks, and Happy Holidays to all!

    If it is just scratch, run some benchmarks with it set to 128k and 256k and see how it feels with each. The default is too small, though some find it acceptable for small images. For larger files you want larger - and for PS scratch you definitely want 128 or 256k.

  • Optimal Block Size for Xserve's RAID hosting Final Cut Server

    What would be the optimal block size for the software RAID on the machine that will be hosting Final Cut Server? The default is 36K. Since FCS is essentially a database, would be the optimal settings? Any glimpse what data size chunks FCS write to the disk?

    Actually I meant the block size for the internal startup volume where FCS is installed, not Xsan volumes. As to optimal settings for Xsan volumes it really depends on the type of the data you store on Xsan, and if it is primarily video, what format: SD, HD.

  • Best Block Size in Raid for Photo files

    I am setting up my two drive striped RAID 0 and came to a screeching halt at the raid block size.
    This RASID is strictly for photo scans and PS CS2 photo files, mostly high res, some medium JPEGs.
    Adobe says PS CS2's default block size in 64K, if I can believe the technical support guy, who said it off the top of his head, after not understanding what I was talking about.
    Apple Tech support first knew nothing about it. Then, after checking all over for quite some time, said 32K is adequate for what I am doing but 64K is alright. In other words, he said nothing.
    What would be the best block size for my purpose and why.
    One scan file size that I just checked is 135.2MB, another 134.6 MB and that is typical. JPEGs are, of course, smaller, ca 284 KB. Photos with the Canon EOS-1Ds Mk II run 9mb up to 200mb after processing. No other tyhpes of files will be on this drive.
    What would be the ideal block size and why?
    Thanks much,
    Mark

    The default 32K is for small random I/O pattern of a server. Use 128/256K for audio and video files. And 64K for workstation use.
    the larger block size gives the best performance for sequential I/O. Someone mentioned an AMUG review of CS2 tests that showed that 64K.
    Because this is probably a scratch volume, you could always test for yourself, and rebuild the RAID later and try a different scheme. Sometimes that is the best way to match your drives, your workflow, and system. There are a couple CS2 scripts and benchmark utilities to help get an idea of how long each step or operation takes.

  • RAID Block size for video

    Can anyone share their experience on what block size in a RAID tends to be better for video, or what size you are using?  (i.e. 128K, 256K, 512K)

    Thanks for the reply Harm. I later noticed that the Areca Controller grays out the block size if RAID 3 is selected.

  • I am putting together a proposal for a Final Cut Pro Workstation to use with a tapeless HD camera.  Can anyone suggest the best camera (in the 5-10,000 dollar range) ?  What hardware and software should I include in the package?

    I am putting together a proposal for a Final Cut Pro Workstation to use with a tapeless HD camera.  Can anyone suggest the best camera (in the 5-10,000 dollar range) ?  What hardware and software should I include in the package?

    This is quite an open suggestion, but here are some ideas which might get you started.  There are good HD cameras in your price range from Sony, Panasonic and Canon (and maybe other manufacturers). Tapeless formats vary.  I have only worked with Sony XDCAM which seems pretty good to me.  File sizes for material shot at 35MBS are not too huge and, with the free Sony transfer and conversion programme, are easy to bring into the computer via USB direct from the camera or from a fairly inexpensive converter.  The Sony XDCAM EX3 can produce results well up to broadcast quality.
    As to hardware, you'll need a powerful MAC - iMac, Macbook Pro or MacPro with 4GB or more of RAM and a good video card.  Softwarewise, FCPX is quite a bit cheaper than FC Studio 3 and of course it's 64bit and can make better use of multi-core machines than FCP7.    It's also designed to handle HD formats with less hassle than FCP7 and is matched to the latest versions of Motion and Compressor.   But you'd probably be wise to search reviews of FCPX before you make your choice - it has some issues.
    A good HD monitor will be essential and, for colour correction etc, you may want to consider a second monitor or HD TV foe editing. ( A MacPro is generally the best machine to connect a second monitor to). 
    This should give you a good editing system, but there are many other things you could add (Photoshop, professional sound monitors, etc)
    Hope this helps a bit.
    Jonathan

  • Provide Feedback for the Final Cut Pro User Manual and Onscreen Help Here

    The Apple documentation team for Final Cut Pro would like to know what you think about the Final Cut Pro 5 Help documentation (available in the Help menu):
    • How often do you use the Final Cut Pro Help? Under what circumstances do you use it most?
    • How do you find what you're looking for in Final Cut Pro Help? For example: table of contents, index, skimming, PDF links, PDF search?
    • What do you like about it most?
    • What is missing?
    • Are there any particular examples of manuals or documentation that you consider to be good models for the Final Cut Pro manual and onscreen help?
    • By what method do you usually learn a new application? For example: provided tutorials and manuals, third-party tutorials or books, training classes?
    • Did you use the Final Cut Pro Getting Started book to familiarize yourself with Final Cut Pro? If so, do you feel the book provided a good introduction to the application?
    • What do you think is the most difficult feature/concept to grasp in Final Cut Pro?
    • What's the most frustrating experience you've had with the Final Cut Pro documentation?
    • Do you prefer electronic or print documentation?
    • Are there any other delivery methods or media you think we should explore?
    • What size computer display do you typically use to view the onscreen help? For example: 15-inch, 17-inch, 20-inch, 23-inch, or 30-inch?
    • What resolution is the computer display set to when you view onscreen help? For example: 1024 x 768, 1280 x 854, or 1920 x 1200 pixels?
    • Do you use multiple computer displays?

    • How often do you use the Final Cut Pro Help? Under
    what circumstances do you use it most?
    Often, I much prefer that to the Manual, though the Search function is very clunky. Search for Nest for example and you'll get about 50 listings for the table of contents and indexes alone, when all I would really want is the explanation of how to actually create a Nest.
    • How do you find what you're looking for in Final
    Cut Pro Help? For example: table of contents, index,
    skimming, PDF links, PDF search?
    Search.
    • What do you like about it most?
    Ease of use to get through the manual instead of going through the books themselves.
    • What is missing?
    Better organization of the search results. Again, if I search Nests, make the first set of results the answers that actually show me how to use the tool, not the 50 times it appears in the table of contents and indexes.
    • Are there any particular examples of manuals or
    documentation that you consider to be good models for
    the Final Cut Pro manual and onscreen help?
    Honestly, Apple's is the best I've seen for the moment.
    • By what method do you usually learn a new
    application? For example: provided tutorials and
    manuals, third-party tutorials or books, training
    classes?
    Just crack the app open and start. Use websites like the Creative Cow for more input and ideas.
    • Did you use the Final Cut Pro Getting Started book
    to familiarize yourself with Final Cut Pro? If so, do
    you feel the book provided a good introduction to the
    application?
    I thought the Tutorial that came with my first copy of FCP (Version 2.0) was outstanding at introducing me to the interface and how FCP operated. I came from Media 100 and in particular, the Log and Capture operation was completely different than what I was used to.
    • What do you think is the most difficult
    feature/concept to grasp in Final Cut Pro?
    Media Manager. Not sure why it has to be so convoluted. Media 100 was too easy with this one. Select the Sequence to be up-rez'd, set your new format and capture.
    • What's the most frustrating experience you've had
    with the Final Cut Pro documentation?
    Search results using the Help menu.
    • Do you prefer electronic or print documentation?
    Actually both. If the electronic search gets too frustrating, I'll pull the print manual out to find what I really need.
    • Are there any other delivery methods or media you
    think we should explore?
    Not really. Internet based help is always nice, but I don't keep my FCP workstations connected to the web so that would actually create a bigger hassle for us.
    • What size computer display do you typically use to
    view the onscreen help? For example: 15-inch,
    17-inch, 20-inch, 23-inch, or 30-inch?
    17" Powerbook display, 17" 20" and 23" Apple Displays and a 17" Sony Display.
    • What resolution is the computer display set to when
    you view onscreen help? For example: 1024 x 768, 1280
    x 854, or 1920 x 1200 pixels?
    Highest resolution for that monitor.
    • Do you use multiple computer displays?
    Yes. 23 & 17" on one G5. 20 & 17" on the 2nd G5. 17" Powerbook
    Powerbook G4 17, G5 Dual 2.0, G5 Dual 2.0 Mac OS X (10.4.5) AJA Kona 2 on both G5's, Fibre Channel and SATA arrays in use.

  • ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'  in Oracle XE

    Hello,
    I am attempting to move the online redo log files to a new flash recovery area location created on network drive "Z" ( Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0).
    When I run @?/sqlplus/admin/movelogs; in SQL*Plus as a local sysdba, I get the following errors:
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'
    ORA-06512: at line 14
    Please let me know how to go about resolving this issue.
    Thank you.
    See below for detail:
    Connected.
    SQL> @?/sqlplus/admin/movelogs;
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem $Header: movelogs.sql 19-jan-2006.00:23:11 banand Exp $
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem movelogs.sql
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem Copyright (c) 2006, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem NAME
    SQL> Rem movelogs.sql - move online logs to new Flash Recovery Area
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem DESCRIPTION
    SQL> Rem This script can be used to move online logs from old online
    log
    SQL> Rem location to Flash Recovery Area. It assumes that the database
    SQL> Rem instance is started with new Flash Recovery Area location.
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem NOTES
    SQL> Rem For use to rename online logs after moving Flash Recovery
    Area.
    SQL> Rem The script can be executed using following command
    SQL> Rem sqlplus '/ as sysdba' @movelogs.sql
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem MODIFIED (MM/DD/YY)
    SQL> Rem banand 01/19/06 - Created
    SQL> Rem
    SQL>
    SQL> SET ECHO ON
    SQL> SET FEEDBACK 1
    SQL> SET NUMWIDTH 10
    SQL> SET LINESIZE 80
    SQL> SET TRIMSPOOL ON
    SQL> SET TAB OFF
    SQL> SET PAGESIZE 100
    SQL> declare
    2 cursor rlc is
    3 select group# grp, thread# thr, bytes/1024 bytes_k
    4 from v$log
    5 order by 1;
    6 stmt varchar2(2048);
    7 swtstmt varchar2(1024) := 'alter system switch logfile';
    8 ckpstmt varchar2(1024) := 'alter system checkpoint global';
    9 begin
    10 for rlcRec in rlc loop
    11 stmt := 'alter database add logfile thread ' ||
    12 rlcRec.thr || ' size ' ||
    13 rlcRec.bytes_k || 'K';
    14 execute immediate stmt;
    15 begin
    16 stmt := 'alter database drop logfile group ' || rlcRec.grp;
    17 execute immediate stmt;
    18 exception
    19 when others then
    20 execute immediate swtstmt;
    21 execute immediate ckpstmt;
    22 execute immediate stmt;
    23 end;
    24 execute immediate swtstmt;
    25 end loop;
    26 end;
    27 /
    declare
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'
    ORA-06512: at line 14
    Can someone point me in the right direction as to what I may be doing wrong here - Thank you!

    888442 wrote:
    I am trying to drop and recreate ONLINE redo logs on my STANDB DATABASE (11.1.0.7)., but i am getting the below error.
    On primary, we have done the changes., ie we added new logfile with bigger size and 3 members. When trying to do the same on Standby we are getting this error.
    Our database is in Active DG Read only mode and the oracle version is 11.1.0.7.
    I have deffered the log apply and cancelled the managed recovery, and dg is in manual mode.
    SQL> alter database Add LOGFILE GROUP 4 ('+DT_DG1','+DT_DG2','+DT_DG3') SIZE 1024M;
    alter database Add LOGFILE GROUP 4 ('+DT_DG1','+DT_DG2','+DT_DG3') SIZE 1024M
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+DT_DG1'First why you are dropping & recreating online redo log files on standby.
    On standby only standby redo log files will be used. Not sure what you are trying to do.
    here is example how to create online redo log files, Check that diskgroup is mounted and have sufficient space to create.
    sys@ORCL> select member from v$logfile;
    MEMBER
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO02.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO01.LOG
    sys@ORCL> alter database add logfile group 4 (
      2     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01a.log',
      3     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01b.log',
      4     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01c.log') size 10m;
    Database altered.
    sys@ORCL> select member from v$logfile;
    MEMBER
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO02.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO01.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01A.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01B.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01C.LOG
    6 rows selected.
    sys@ORCL>
    Your profile:-
    888442      
         Newbie
    Handle:      888442
    Status Level:      Newbie
    Registered:      Sep 29, 2011
    Total Posts:      12
    Total Questions:      8 (7 unresolved)
    Close the threads if answered, Keep the forum clean.

  • Can Apple Sue Stores For Reselling Final Cut Pro X? Please Reply:)

    Can Apple Sue Stores For Reselling Final Cut Pro X? Because i saw an authorized store selling it for 39 Dollars?
    Please Help Fast Thanks:)

    App Store download is the only recognized legal method I know of as well.
    Anything else is either a misunderstanding or dodgy.
    Al

  • Default block size for UFS format in OSX?

    Hi,
    I formatted an external drive as "unix format" (UFS) using Disk Utility, which subsequently became unrecognizable by the firewire controller. Now in a Unix box, the superblock of this drive is coming up as corrupted or nonexistent. Does anyone know where I can find the default block size for UFS in os x? I need to specify a backup superblock. Thanks!
    -Dan

    If it is just scratch, run some benchmarks with it set to 128k and 256k and see how it feels with each. The default is too small, though some find it acceptable for small images. For larger files you want larger - and for PS scratch you definitely want 128 or 256k.

  • Using large block sizes for index and table spaces

    " You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.
    Is this a generic statement that I can use for all tables or indexes? I also have batch and online activity. My primary target is batch and it should not impact online. Not sure if both have common tables.
    How to find the current block size used for tables and index? is there a v$parameter query?
    What is an optimal block size value for batch?
    How do I know when flatter tree str has been achieved using above changes? Is there a query to determine this?
    What about tables, what is the success criterion for tables. can we use the same flat tree str criterion? Is there a query for this?

    user3390467 wrote:
    " You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.
    Is this a generic statement that I can use for all tables or indexes? This is a generic statement used by some consultants. Unfortunately, it is riddled with exceptions and other considerations.
    One consultant in particular seems to have anecdotal evidence that using different block sizes for index (big) and data (small) can yield almost miraculous improvements. However, that can not be backed up due to NDA. Many of the rest of us can not duplicate the improvements, and indeed some find situations where that results in a degradation (esp with high insert/update rates from separated transactions).
    I also have batch and online activity. My primary target is batch and it should not impact online. Not sure if both have common tables.
    How to find the current block size used for tables and index? is there a v$parameter query?
    What is an optimal block size value for batch?
    How do I know when flatter tree str has been achieved using above changes? Is there a query to determine this?
    What about tables, what is the success criterion for tables. can we use the same flat tree str criterion? Is there a query for this?I'd strongly recommend that you
    1) stop using generic tools to analyze specific problems
    2) define you problem in detail ()what are you really trying to accomplish - seems like performance tuning, but you never really state that)
    3) define the OS and DB version - in detail. Give rev levels and patch levels.
    If you are having a serious performance issue, I strongly recommend you look at some performance tuning specialists like "http://www.method-r.com/", "http://www.miracleas.dk/", "http://www.hotsos.com/", "http://www.pythian.com/", or even Oracle's Performance Tuning consultants. Definitely worth the price of admission.

  • Optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G on Windows 2008 R2 (OLTP)

    Hi All,
    We are currently setting up an Oracle 11G instance on a Windows 2008 R2 server and were looking to see if there was an optimal NTFS block size. I've read the following: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/win.112/e10845/specs.htm
    But it only mentioned the block sizes that can be used (2k - 16k). And basically what i got out of it, was the different block szes affect the max # of database files possible for each database.
    Is there an optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G OLTP system on Windows?
    Thanks in advance

    Is there an optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G OLTP system on Windows?ideally FS block size should be equal to Oracle tablespace block size.
    or at least be N times less than Oracle block size.
    For example - if Oracle BS=8K then NTFS BS better to be 8K but also can be 4K or 2K.
    Also both must be 1 to N times of Disk sector size. Older disks had sectors 512 bytes.
    Contemporary HDDs have internal sector size 4K. Usually.

  • What's the best Mac for running Final Cut Pro X?

    Title says it all. What's the best Mac for running Final Cut Pro X? I'm not looking to make a feature length hollywood film. But I'd like to be able to edit video without lag.

    Yes. Begin with the fastest processor / graphics card / and as much RAM as you can afford. (As all three will become obsolete over time.)
    I started from scratch. I have a 27-inch iMac with a 3.4 G Intel Core i7. (currently the fastest processor for an iMac) I also ordered the best graphics card--AMD Ratheon HD. I ordered 16G of RAM, but recently added more RAM to equal 24G. (OWC makes good after-market RAM for iMACs.)
    Last, I ordered a flash drive / SATA hard drive combo.  (250G on flash / ITB on SATA). The OS and all of my applications run off the flash drive. (for fast start up!)
    I put all of my media and FCP projects onto the SATA hard drive.
    Now, I had the option to order a 2TB SATA. But, I realized I can always buy more external storage as I edit more and more projects. ALSO! FCPX is GREAT when it comes to editing projects on external drives! I can segregate an entire project and its media files onto a removeable drive. I simply launch FCPX, plug in the drive and--poof!--I'm ready to edit. It sees the project and the media right away. When I'm done editing, I can then send this drive to another editor (also using FCPX) or attach it to my MacBook if I want to edit the same project in the field.
    This has worked for me. I wish you luck.

  • I loss the serial number for my Final Cut Pro. I just traid instaling before that upgrade my Mac G5 2004 Computer. Could anybody help me?.

    I loss the serial number for my Final Cut Pro. I just traid instaling before that upgrade my Mac G5 2004 Computer. Could anybody help me?.

    These are user forums. You are not speaking to Apple here. You may contact them:
    Apple Store Customer Service at 1-800-676-2775 or visit online Help for more information.
    To contact product and tech support visit online support site.

  • RAID block size for final cut pro x

    Just got one of the new late 2012 27" iMacs and a 6 TB LaCie Thunderbolt drive. Can finally edit the video I took last spring. I'll be using Final Cut Pro X, and doing a lot of multicam stuff with 4 or 5 views and a separate audio track. The LaCie came formatted as a mirrored RAID. I'm going to change that to 0 (Striped RAID set), but am wondering what block size to set. The default is 32k, but I have read that this ought to be increased to the max (256k) for video editing. I have also read it should NOT be increased. And the posts I have read have all been at least 3 years old. So let me ask you all--what block size would you recommend for my situation?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Eddie...
    This depends on what kind of source footage you are editing....
    For compressed Video, Audio and Uncompressed audio 128k
    I have only had BAD results with 256k. 64 is also weird. Whereas 32 is fine.
    All my RAIDs have 128k for audio/video editing
    you can go further if you editing Image Sequences.. but according to my own findings and I have been dealing with raid since years.... 128k does the job the best.
    Rule of thumb.... The smaller the file sizes you are putting the RAID the smaller the block size. And vice versa.
    I.e. You would cripple the raid performance if storing a database on it, having a block size of 256. In case of servers and OS 32k would be a good choice, perhaps even 16k if supported.

Maybe you are looking for