CIf - idoc or table mapping

Hi Expert
I need a small clarification. When an order is tranferred fom APO to R/3, does it create an idoc and sends it to R/3 or its table to table mapping between two system. Do any of have idea about document/ format in which the data is transferred from APO to R/3.
Please help

Hi Pushpinder,
Transfer of orders from APO & R/3 and vice versa is OLTP ie online transfer processing system.
The data will get transferred via change pointers. For every change, there will be equivalent change pointers gets generated in system and gets updated.
The change pointers either can be immediately sent to the target system from source system or there is
also another option of collecting all change pointers and transfer it periodicially.
Manually, change pointers can be pushed to target system via transaction /sapapo/c5.
I hope it is clear now.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Similar Messages

Difference in idoc adapter header mapping between SP14 and SP19

Hi All,
i have a very strange problem.......i have 2 XI systems : XI-sandbox and XI-dev.....
XI-sandbox is on XI3.0 SP19 whereas XI-dev is on XI3.0 SP14...........
I have a file->XI->idoc scenario which is same on both XI-sandbox and XI-dev....
in receiver idoc adapter, i am using header mapping for sender service and in the sender service i am using XPATH of a field of control rec of idoc.........
this scenario works fine on XI-sandbox which is on SP19 and the idocs are sent to SAP R/3 sandbox...........but this scenario on XI-dev gives error in SXMB_MONI in XI-dev of Call adapter - "No party conversion found".........
So my question is that is there any difference in idoc adapter header mapping between SP14 and SP19.........
Thanks,
Rajeev Gupta
Message was edited by:
RAJEEV GUPTA

><i>so i cant use apply control rec values from payload.........</i>
rajeev,
I know this has nothing to do with the original problem but please do bear.
If I undertood you posts correct, the Sender Partner Name is set in the Idoc Control record in the field SNDPRN in the mapping using some mapping logic.
Now, this is the partner name with which the idoc is to be posted to thge R3 system.
if yes, then like I have pointed above, using "Take Sender From Payload" in the Receivcer Idoc Adapter is a better option as pointed in the SAP help as well.
As you are already populating the idoc control ecord with SNDPRN just make the SNDPRT as LS and then select "Take Sender from Payload" in the receiver Idoc adapter and the Sender Partner Name will not be taken from SDNPRN just as you want.
This is different from "Apply Control Records From Payload" .
Regards
Bhavesh
PS : you can ignore this reply if the situatios is too late to make this change and thanks for the patience.

A table mapping between ISO country code and ISO currency code

Hi experts,
I want to know whether there is a table mapping between ISO country code and ISO currency code.I have searched T005(Countries) and TCURC(Currency Codes).why the filed of WAERS(Country currency) hasn't maintained in talbe T005?Whether ISO country code and ISO currency code hasn't direct relation?
Regards,
Kelvin

Kelvin,
If you know the table which is having ISO Country Code or ISO Currency code,then go to that table and clik on GRAPHIC(ctrlShiftf11) which will give the foreign key relationships.I guess checking all those table displayed in the graphic will give you some lead.
K.Kiran.

A table mapping between country code and currency code

Hi experts,
I want to know whether there is a table mapping between country code and currency code.I have found the table T005(Countries).But I don't why the filed of WAERS(Country currency) hasn't maintained in talbe T005?Whether country code and currency code hasn't direct relation?
Regards,
Kelvin

Dear Kelvin
The said field (WAERS) can be fetched from many tables. To name a few, below are some of the tables in which, you can see the field for currency.
1) BKKI4
2) BKKI5
3) BWPOS
4) KNKA
5) KNVV
6) MSEG
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Import Server - Multiple Qualified Table - Map Crash

Hello,
Requirement: I need to update multiple qualified table using single source file.
Preparation: I have created a map where mapping to multiple qualified table fields maually.
Have created a Inbound Port using the above map.
Problem: Import server throws an exception; while opening the Import Manager using the Port Option and corresponding Exception; Lot of fields were un-mapped. Looks like Import map crashed.
Please feel free to throw some light reg the same!
Thanks
Alexander

Hi Alexander,
If you are performing multiple qualifier table mapping and importing then you will hav eto create differnt map for each table importing.In that case you will rrquire multiple inbound ports and in each ports deatils you will give the map name pertaining to which qualified lookup table you wish to import.
Actually using automatic importing for lookups is not desirable as the lookups always need to be prepopulated before your main table importing.
The exception taht you are receiving could be due to the reason that the map you are saving is using only one table mapping and so most of the fields are left unmapped.
try not to use automatic importing for Lookup qualifier tables and use manual importing and see if the the exception still comes.
Hope it helps
Kindly reaward points if found useful
Thanks
Simona

Idoc - to - JDBC mapping..

Can any one help me on step-by-step Idoc to JDBC mapping ..

Check this link for jdbc receiver adapter. and follow the instructions. If you need more assistance let us know with your requirement
For configuring JDBC adapter
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/64/ce4e886334ec4ea7c2712e11cc567c/content.htm
For creating jdbc structure on the inbound side
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/content.htm

Help with multi-table mapping for one-to-many object inheritance

Hi,
I have posted on here before regarding this (Toplink mapping for one-to-many object inheritance but I am still having problems mapping my object model to my schema.
Object model
The Person and Organisation objects contain base information and have the primary keys person_id and organisation_id. It is important that there is no duplication of person and organisation records, no matter how many times they are saved in different roles.
There are two types of licenceholder in the problem domain, and the ILicenceHolder interface defines information and methods that are common to both. The PersonalLicenceHolder object represents one of these types of licenceholder, and is always a person, so this class extends Person and implements ILicenceHolder.
The additional information and methods that are required by the second type of licenceholder are defined in the interface IPremisesLicenceHolder, which extends ILicenceHolder. Premises licence holders can either be people or organisations, so I have two objects to represent these - PremisesLicenceHolderPerson which implements IPremisesLicenceHolder and extends Person, and PremisesLicenceHolderOrganisation which implements IPremisesLicenceHolder and extends Organisation.
The model is further complicated by the fact that any single Person may be both a PersonalLicenceHolder and a PremisesLicenceHolderPerson, and may be so several times over. In this case, the same basic Person information needs to be linked to several different sets of licenceholder information. In the same way, any single Organisation may be a PremisesLicenceHolderOrganisation several times over.
Sorry this is complicated!
Schema
I have Person and Organisation tables containing the basic information with the primary keys person_id and organisation_id.
I have tried to follow Donald Smith's advice and have created a Role table to record the specialised information for the different types of licence holder. I want the foreign keys in this table to be licenceholder_id and licence_id. Licenceholder_id will reference either organisation_id or person_id, and licence_id will reference the primary key of the Licence table to link the licenceholder to the licence. Because I am struggling with the mapping, I have changed licenceholder_id to person_id in an attempt to get it working with the Person object before I try the Organisation.
Then, when a new licenceholder is added, if the person/organisation is already in the database, a new record is created in the Role table linking the existing person/organisation to the existing licence rather than duplicating the person/organisation information.
Mapping
I am trying to use the toplink mapping workbench to map my PremisesLicenceHolderPerson object to my schema. I have mapped all inherited attributes to superclass (Person). The primary table that the attributes are mapped to is Person, and I have used the multi-table info tab to add Roles as an additional table and map the remaining attributes to that.
I have created the references PERSON_ROLES which maps person.person_id to roles.person_id, ROLES_PERSON which maps roles.person_id to person.person_id and ROLES_LICENCE which maps roles.licence_id to licence.licence_id.
I think I have put in all the relationships, but I cannot get rid of the error message "The following primary key fields are unmapped: PERSON_ID".
Please can somebody tell me how to map this properly?
Thank you.

I'm not positive about your mappings, but it looks like the Person object should really have a 1:M or M:M mapping to the Licenceholder table. This then means that your object model should be similar, in that Person object could have many Licenses, instead of being LicenceHolders. From the looks of it, you have it set up from the LicenceHolder perspective. What could be done instead if a LicenceHolder could have a 1:1 reference to a person data object, rather than actually be a Person. This would allow the person data to be easily shared among licences.
LicenceHolder1 has an entry in the LicenceHolder table and Person table. LicenceHolder2 also has entries in these tables, but uses the same entry in the Person table- essentially it is the same person/person_ID. If both are new objects, TopLink would try to insert the same person object into the Person table twice. I'm not sure how you have gotten around or are planning to get around this problem.
Since you are using inheritance, it means that LicenceHolder needs a writable mapping to the person.person_id field- most commonly done through a direct to field mapping. From the description, it looks like roles.person_id is a foreign key in the multiple table mapping, meaning it would be set based on the value in the person.person_id field, but the person.person_id isn't actually mapped in the object. Check to make sure that the ID attribute LicenceHolder is inheriting from person hasn't been remapped in the LicenceHolder descriptor to a different field.
Best Regards,
Chris

FACT table Mapping

I could not find a clear documentation on how to create a mapping to load CUBE
after creating dimensions. I am using 10.1.0.2 version.
I have two dimensions and one FACT table
DIM1
D1_sk
other attributes
DIM2
D2_SK
other attributes
FACT
D1_sk
D2_sk
measure attributes
In previous forums I came across to use a lookup on dimensions
to load the FACT table.
But what would be my source to perform a lookup on Dimensions ?
because My dimensions are the source for the FACT TABLE.
Can I Join the DIMENSIONS to load the FACT TABLE?
can any one suggest the right approach to creat a FACT table mapping.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
If you can tell what you are tying to achieve we can give some suggestions. You can use the same sources which you have used to load Dimensions, to load Fact table.
Mahesh

Retreive IDOC number and map it to a field in Target XML

Hi Experts,
IDOC to file scenario
I have a requirement where I have to retreive the number of the IDOC generated and map it to a field ID in the target XML.
Do i have to use a UDF for this? can ne one pls explain?
Regards,
Teja

Hi Ravi,
You dont need use a UDF for this.
this is a very simple requiremen.
You can get the IDOC number from source IDOc
under EDI_DC40 node field name DOCNUM.
This DOCNUM fielsd will contain the IDOC number
Map this DOCNUM field from source IDOC to target XML structure.

TopLink Question - Mutliple Object to Single Table mapping

Just a short question,
Does toplink support mapping feature as such that it can map two distinct objects with single table that when in insertion or selection those two objects can be manipulated, selected in single operation? I know that TopLink mapping supports single object from multiple table mapping, but I'm not sure about multiple objects being associated with single table.
Secondly, does Hibernate has something like what I described above?
Howard.

Hi Howard,
You can map two objects to a single table if the objects are related by aggregation.
In TopLink, two objectsa source (parent or owning) object and a target (child or owned) objectare related by aggregation if there is a strict one-to-one relationship between them, and all the attributes of the target object can be retrieved from the same data source representation as the source object. This means that if the source object exists, then the target object must also exist, and if the source object is destroyed, then the target object is also destroyed.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/doc/1013/main/_html/tutbuild004.htm#sthref2325
-Blaise

Multiple Table Mapping To Single Entity in Workshop 8.1

I've taken a test run on creating entity beans with workshop 8.1, although mapping
an CMP entity to a single database table looks to be relatively straightforward,
I can't seem to find a way to map multiple database tables to a single CMP entity
(at least not via workshop). Do I have to manually modify the deployment descriptors
after building with workshop?

Thanks, John.
Jingwei
"John Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Jingwei Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
Is there any example of using ejbgen to map single EJB to multiple tables?
Jingwei... I found this at: http://www.beust.com/cedric/ejbgen/#multiple-table-mapping
By default, Entity beans are mapped to one table, with the attribute
table-name
on the tag @ejbgen:entity. If you want to map your Entity bean to more
than one
table, you can use the table-name attribute on individual @ejbgen:cmp-fields.
All the CMP fields that do not have a table-name attribute will use the
table
specified on @ejbgen:entity (which can therefore be considered as the
"default"
table).
If you want to map an Entity bean to several tables, you need to specify
a comma-separated
list of tables in the table-name attribute (and also on column). For
example:
* @ejbgen:cmp-field
* column = "bal1, bal2"
* table-name = "Table1, Table2"
Make sure that the number of tables matches the number of columns, and
that the
columns exist in the corresponding table (for example, in the example
above, Table1
must contain column bal1, and Table2, bal2).

Table mapping Security???

Hi,
What is table mapping security in universe??? how to give that??please give an example??also what is connection security in universe designer??

hi,
Please refer below link (with examples)
http://www.dataspace.com/Downloads/IA_Final_Sup_MD.pdf
Lets say in Universe you are using Table1 earlier. Now you want to map this to new Table called Table2.
simply, you can replace a table referenced in the universe with another table
Table Mapping feature helps to achieve this easily.
Connection Security:
Each universe has its name and connection. You can select another connection, or create a new connection for the universe. The connection for the universe specified in Access Restrictions applies to the user or group that is affected by the restriction.
Regards,
Vamsee

NEW GL's Changed Tables mapping

Hi,
I Need to know more about new GL's Changed Tables mapping .
Warm Regards,
Sachin Darekar

Dear Sridher,
Please cehck the SAP Note 812919 - My SAP ERP New G/L Migration.
other wise you can do other way.
but it's as on 01.04.xxxx year go live date
better to take the valus as on 31.03.xxxx
mean time you can activate the Document spliting and up load the values as on 01.04.xxxx
but in this case dont do the carry forward run for that F Year.
morever when you up grade the ECC - 6 version
this G/L function will be actived automated, and your transaction data will be store in GLTO and FAGLFLEXT
tables, after that if you want to de activate the classis G/L u can.
Regards
radha

Table mapping (KODO 3.4) using XDoclet

Hi,
I need to map an Object to a differntly named table via XDoclet. That is described in the [url http://edocs.bea.com/kodo/docs303/ref_guide_integration_xdoclet.html]Docs here.
When I use the foloowing class it will produce a different looking JDO file and KODO simply ignores it. Can you tell me, what I'm doing wrong?
Java Code:
* @jdo.persistence-capable
* identity-type="application"
* objectid-class="MyClassId"
* @jdo.class-vendor-extension
* vendor-name="kodo" key="detachable" value="true"
* @jdo.class-vendor-extension
* vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base"
* @jdo.class-vendor-extension
* vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map/table" value="MyTableName"
public class MyClass {...}
JDO file:
<class name="MyClass" identity-type="application" objectid-class="MyClassId" requires-extent="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="detachable" value="true">
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map/table" value="MyTableName">
</extension>
<field name="xxx" persistence-modifier="persistent" primary-key="false" null-value="none">
</field>
Update:
I also tried:
* @jdo.persistence-capable
* identity-type="application"
* objectid-class="MyClassId"
* table="MyTable"
public class MyClass {...}
But it seems, Kodo does not support the table attribute!
Update 2:
The upper solution should be the right one. It seems in the kodo.properties must be set the attribute "kodo.jdbc.MappingFactory: metadata"
Is anyone using such a table mapping that is working? I'm still struggeling to get this working!
Edited by jdeluxe at 05/16/2008 4:32 AM

Wow, I didn't expect almost 100 people watching this thread without any hint!
Here it is:
Ant Task
          <jdomappingtool action="refresh" sqlfile="XXX">
               <fileset dir="YYY" >
                    <include name="**/*.jdo" />
               </fileset>
               <config propertiesFile="D:/kodo-jdo-3.4.1/kodo.properties" />
EntityClass:
* @jdo.persistence-capable
*           identity-type="application"
*      objectid-class="foo.MyClassId"
*      name="myClass"
* @jdo.class-vendor-extension
*           vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base"
* @jdo.class-vendor-extension
*           vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map/table" value="MYTABLENAME"
* @jdo.class-vendor-extension
*           vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map/pk-column" value="ID"
public class MyClass {
* description
* @jdo.field persistence-modifier="persistent"
* @jdo.field-vendor-extension vendor-name="kodo"
* key="jdbc-field-map" value="value"
* @jdo.field-vendor-extension vendor-name="kodo"
* key="jdbc-field-map/column" value="description"
private String description;
Note that when not using the explicit column mapping I experienced a strange behaviour: Kodo did not map to the existing table column, but wanted to add new fields postfixed with "1" (e.g. ALTER TABLE MYTABLENAME ADD COLUMN "description1").
Also the setting
kodo.jdbc.MappingFactory: metadata
in the kodo.properties file is mandatory !!!!!

Data Load - Data / Table Mapping Columns Not Showing

Hi,
Using the new 4.1 functionality I have created a data load wizard.
Everything seems to have created OK however when i run the wizard and get to the Data / Table Mapping stage (2nd page) the column names lov contains no list of values.
The table i am trying to load in is in another schema but all the grants are there so that schema can view it.
Any idea what I need to do or what I have missed so the columns can be viewed.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
You have to log in as admin and there should be an option to add schemas, once adding it should appear in the lov.
This link should help.
Parsing Schema

CIf - idoc or table mapping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for