CIF issue on EP

Hi
We have problems in CIF. External procurements are blocked while transfering from APO to R3. The application log says " no source of supply for X product and Y plant".
If i check for PR/STR in //RRP3 for this location product, no PR/STR exists on this product with that external procurement no.
I surprised where from these external procurements created/stored and why these queues are blocked.
Can any one explain what is the reason for this?
regards
Vijaya.

Hi Vijaya,
Please check on the following
1) Try running /sapapo/ccr transaction for external procurement items
2) Check the application log
3) Check whether transportation lane is blocked or opened for those items
4) Check the procurement type under procurement tab for the products whether
defined properly
5) In inhouse, check ppm is defined
Please confirm your results
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Similar Messages

CIF issue u201CNo data in table TRFCQDATA selected (internal )u201D

Hi SAP Gurus,
I am facing CIF issue in R/3 quality system after this system has been refreshed with production. When i try to activate the integration model for any data, the inbound queues are failing with status "u201CNo data in table TRFCQDATA selected (internal )u201D. When i try to delete this queue and activate the integration model the same is getting activated. But seems like activation is not happening as expected. Please advise on how do resolve this issue of u201CNo data in table TRFCQDATA selected (internal )u201D.
I have been looking into the SAP note 961154 for the resolution. But when we tried the same implementing and it thrown up an error message saying that its applicable to DB2 database .We are having IBM hardware with Linux and oracle database. Please any one of you know what SAP note is applicable in that case. I am not sure of what needs to be maintained in that tabe TRFCQDATA and the significance of the same.
Based on your replies, i am thinking of reaching out the SAP by raising an OSS note.
Thanks in Advance.
Jagadeesh

Hi,
The destination in SMQR should either be empty or pointing to a destination on the local system. If you configure it with a destination pointing to other system, then you will get this problem, because the data is only available on the local system and the inbound luws should only be processed on this local system.
Please check the note no 369007, specifically question 11 to ensure you have the correct settings.Also go through the note description and answers to other questions and see if it helps.
Also check the following notes:
697884 - Queues in SMQ2 are not processed.
524419 - Procedure for large-scale queue jams.
523974 - Inbound/outbound queues are not processed.
527481 - tRFC or qRFC calls are not processed.
564612 - FAQ, Q+A, SM59, RFC destination, RFC error
I hope I could help.
Regards,
Tibor

APO CIF issue - Purchase Info Record not getting CIFed from R/3 to APO

Dear All,
We are unable to CIF Purchase Info Record from SAP R/3 to APO. Are there any special setting that needs to be done for the same. We have created an Integration Model and using tcodes CFM1/CFM2 but without any success. Can anybody throw some light on this issue?
Thanks in advance
Ehsan Ahmed

Ehsaan
Can you check the SLG1 logs in R/3 and APO sides for further clues? Try to confine the time range to the exact time of activation of Purch INfo record model.
Maybe you have already done this check. Can you go to the Purchasing tab of Material Master and see if the Source List checkbox is unchecked ? Do you have any special procurement keys defined by any chance ?
Regards
Srinivas

CIFS Issues following May 2014 Maintenance Patch

Hi All,
Just wondering if anyone else has noticed issues with novell-cifs on OES 11 SP1 or SP2 following the May 2014 Updates?
We installed the most recent patches via YAST and noticed issues saving to our File Servers via CIFS from Autodesk Inventor. Inventor could see the mapped drives and open files however when saving a new file, it would give an error 'Failed to Create Folder, "H:".'
The offending RPM versions are:
OES11 SP2: novell-cifs-1.3.2-0.90.9
OES11 SP1: novell-cifs-1.3.1-35.52.73.19
Rolling back to the following versions resolved the issue:
OES11 SP2: novell-cifs-1.3.2-0.88.2
OES11 SP1: novell-cifs-1.3.1-35.52.69.1
I'm interested in knowing if anyone has experienced the same or similar issues. Most of our File Server traffic comes from Mac OS X or Citrix XenDesktop connections using CIFS. Unfortunately this means our reasons to continue running OES11 file servers with NSS are diminishing as we can't make full use of the features via CIFS. :(
Thanks,
John

Hi Wilfried,
Originally Posted by gerstner
Hi Jens & John
all Volumes of our OES11 Server are mounted with long namespace.
Meanwile we switched back from the buggy version to rpm novell-cifs-1.3.2-0.86.1 and every thing works fine again.
To open a SR at Novell (this would be the best way) ist just a question of time. Our OES Servers are just a view among hundreds of others. From the past i know it consumes a lot of time (tons of logs etc.).
To switch back to a previous version, is a workarround we could live with.
if you let me know the SR number (via private message), I'll try to help streamline things. When you open the SR, it ought to be sufficient to upload the supportconfig file, quote the descriptions from this thread and add a reference to this thread - so not *that much* time involved...
Regards,
Jens

CIF issue :PDS components are not transfering to APO

HI,
i am not getting input components in PDS. only master output compnent available in PDS.
why i am not getting input components in PDS? i checked R/3 PV, BOM , routing....everything fine... everything moved correctly to APO except input components( BOM components)
any setting or config i am missing ??
regards
Rajesh

Hi,
Check the below:
1. FG Materials and all the Component Material to be in APO in a Active Integration Model.
2. BOM & Routing and Production Version setup correctly.
3. The Routing Operations have to Relevant to 'SCHEDULING'.
4. Try deleting the existing Integration model for materials & re-create new IM & activate. (In my case, this have solved the issue)
5. If this still does not work ... if your Integration Model is already Active ... try if recreate the IM for PDS from ECC ... to see if it sends.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Nawanit

CIF ISSUE

Hi gurus,
while i am Ciffing the materials with respective plant. the job got failure.
when i checked in application log the error as
"Function module CUCB_CHECK_EXISTENCE_OF_INSTA does not exist"
"Unqualified function call /SAPAPO/DM_PRODUCTS_MAINTAIN".
could you please help me out i didn't understand this error.
all suggestions are welcome..
regards,
kumar.

Hi Kumar
Please check the SAP note : Note 862457 - Error when the material version is transferred
Function module CUCB_CHECK_EXISTENCE_OF_INSTA , The module checks the existence of a configuration instance at a time.
The date is determined by the import parameters IV_MOMENT or IV_DATE. If both initial, it is checked whether the co nfigurationsinstanz at the current time exists. If IV_MOMENT transferred, this time given is used. If passed, not IV_DATE IV_MOMENT, so it is checked whether the existing configuration at the start date is IV_DATE.
If the configuration instance existing at the time, is the building block throws an exception or IBASE_INSTANCE INOB_INSTANCE.
I hope this will help you.
Amol

EWM CIF issue

Hi experts,
We are trying to CIF a plant from ECC to EWM. The locations master is created in EWM but no Business partner is created. We have mentioned in integration model to create both Loc master and BP. Are we missing on any setting / data ? Any pointers on this will be useful.
Regards.

Hi,
check the system log for the error in SCM using SLG1. I am guessing it could be because of the number ranges for BPs. create an external number range which allows the BPs you are CIFfing from ERP. Hope this helps!

New 7410 and CIFS Issue

Hey team...This is my first Sun 7410 system and posting! I have been working on setting up the CIFS. I have created the project for them and started adding some CIFS. I created a CIFS called "MOU_FS$" with the mount point "/export/MOU_FS". I then created another CIFS called "mou_profiledata" with the mount point "/export/MOU_FS/mou_profiledata". It created it but I dont see it under the MOU_FS$ directory. When I deleted the mou_profiledata CIFS it then showed up, but it will not allow me to delete it from the directory side. I dont want it any more, what can I do to delete it?
Thanks Scott L.

Hello,
Yes, there are ways to do this. None of them very elegant. But, a list of just about every program that can do this and a brief discussion about them can be found here:
http://macs.about.com/od/ipod/a/copyfromipod.htm
Be sure that he looks over the "See Also" and "Related Articles" listed at the bottom of that page.
I think that will put him on the right path.
I hope this helps.
Let us know if you have other questions.
P.S., if you'd like, go ahead and click the "Helpful" or "Solved" buttons on any of the posts / replies above if you feel they were helpful or adequately answered your question.

SMB/CIFS Issue - Sufficient Privileges

Every time I try to transfer files using a samba share I get the following error message at the end
"The operation cannot be completed because you do not have sufficient privileges for some of the items."
The file transfers successfully but I cannot transfer multiple files and it really is a pain. I have read some articles online about POSIX locks and editing smb.conf. I was wondering if there is a better way of resolving this?

There was a suggestion out here recently to disable Bonjour's Name Resolution...but connecting to the remote drive by IP address, instead of name.
Like so:
Connect by IP address, and it should bypass Bonjour name resolution. Hit command-K, and in the window that pops up type
afp://<ip-address>
where <ip-address> is the IP of the host you want to connect to. For example, if the IP address of the Aiport basestation hosting the drive is 10.0.0.1, you would type:
afp://10.0.0.1
This was a long fix for a slightly different problem http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=877397&tstart=0
Worth a try.
Aso consider if thisis a large folder full of pictures - mac seems to think it needs to generate thumbnails of all those image files...think of the network and CPU time needed for that.

Can't add CIFS Share from iManager on OES

I recently install OES and have not been able to add a CIFS share from
iManager .
The error is:
Error: The given volume name could not be found on the specified server.
I've tried entering the path is various ways:
\vol1\share\
\vol1\share
vol1\share\
vol1\share
vol1:\share\
I've recreated the Pool and now have the volume name "VOLUME1" but still no
success.
Logger Screen reports:
GadgetManager......2796 Could not find resource file mapping for stylesheet:
NSSMgmt.xsl
GadgetManager......2796 Could not find resource file mapping for stylesheet:
NSSMgmt.xsl
Trying NCP protocol
Any suggestions?
Thank you.
Marc

The source of the CIFS issue is the cluster snapin.
The CIFS functionally is included in the cluster snapin for cluster
services version 1.6 (NetWare 6.0) and 1.7 (NetWare 6.5).
Unfortunately, with Cluster Services 1.8 (OES and NetWare 6.5 SP3),
Novell dropped the CIFS functionality from the cluster snapin. So when
you install an OES/NetWare server, or when you install SP3 to an
existing Server, you will loose the CIFS snapin.
Note that reinstalling SP3 will not bring you back the CIFS
functionality as it is actually the cause of the disappearence.
To get back the CIFS functionality, you have to get the NCS 1.7 cluster
snapins. The latest version of these snapins can be found in NW65SP2 in
the file NCS.ZIP. Unpack these file somewhere and use the files NCS.JAR
and NCSRES.JAR from this ZIP file to replace the corresponding files of
your ConsoleOne installation.
Marcel Cox
http://support.novell.com/forums

CIF QUEUE in R3

Hi,
For the CIF Queues in R3, i could see the errors in SMQ1 and SMQ2 ..how do we find the cause of the error,
Pls answer,
Regards,
Dhanush

Hi,
Many a times, you see the reason in the error itself.
For example., you may see the error "Integration model not active for material XXX in Plant YYYY".
For finding the root cause , you will have to study the related processes in detail( how the process is performed in SAP ECC or APO).
From experience, the majoirty cause of the errors could be attirbuted to 1. Master Data Errors, 2. job / process failures 3. Bugs
Please refer to OSS note 563806 ( FAQ: APO CIF) , which is gives a very good insight in CIF issues, best practices etc.
Regards
Datta

Error Of "Difference In Content (Error Code 191)" on doing CCR After SNP

Dear Sir / Madam,
On Taking SNP Heuristics, Our ECC system is getting choked. Proper stock transfer requisitions are getting generated in APO. Though. these purchase requisitions are getting displayed in ECC but the same number is NOT getting updated in APO. On doing CCR, we are getting Error u201CDifference In Contentu201D with error code 191. Even after repeated iterations by choosing the flow of data towards u201CAPOu201D, purchase requisition numbers are NOT getting updated.
Kindly Advise Further.
With Best Regards,
Sanjeev Chugh

Mam,
Thanks for the reply and we feel sorry for Not Updating the forum. The problem is very critical and system's behaviour is quite eratic. I shall like to elaborate the complete scenario.
On 4th October, we did the CCR iterations repeatedly and then Pur.Req. Number got updated in APO. On our next SNP run (Taken on 11-OCT-2011), we did not face any such issue and all the working was normal as usual. But on the next SNP run (taken on 20-OCT-2011), same problem came again and this time, to get the end result, it took us nearly 3 days for repeated CCR iterations but we could get the end results
Then, we took another SNP run on 02-NOV-2011 and again we are facing the same problem. Till date, we could not get the end results.
We shall also like to confirm that we have checked all the IM for Purchase Orders And Purchase Requisitions. But could not find any duplicate IM (We have the very systematic nomenclateure for our IM's). We have checked almost all the IM's details as well.
Around two years back, we faced some CIFFING issue, at that time, we found the problem of Multiple IM.
This be for your kind information and further advise in this regard please.
With Best Regards,
Sanjeev Chugh
03-NOV-2011 (M)

What should I expect when opening an SR?

Over this past year, I believe I have opened (4) SR's. One of them was an incredible experience when we lost an entire Cluster Resource and the Novell Engineer helped us in building the new one and taught us much in the course of the rebuild.
My first SR was to finalize our documentation regarding the creation of Cluster Resources. Overall, the assistance was pretty good other than the Tech did not inform me about the use of "Cluster Scan for New Devices." Which ultimately led us to losing an entire Cluster Resource.
A few weeks back I opened a ticket on a CIFs issue that had been bothering us for over a year. While working with the Tech DSTRACES were required. The Tech could not get one to complete properly. I, have only worked with Netware for 2 years, was also not that versed in using DSTRACE. But, after I saw what he was attempting to do I ran the trace and determined the issue on my own. Input that was provided and or suggested at the time was questionable at best. The Tech was also very slow from my perspective in attempting to resolve this issue. It was not a down issue but it would be days between contact at times. Overall, I would have to say this Tech's abilities are not what I feel I should expect when opening an SR with Novell. I feel I should be getting someone with some experience. I feel DSTRACE should be a tool that all Netware Support Tech's should be very well versed in.
And now for my current ticket..... Every since I have been here, we have had issues with not being able to install certificates into our Netware Cluster. I finally took the bull by the horns and opened an SR for this nagging issue. I was initially assigned one Tech and we had a phone conversation regarding the issue that went great and I felt the best way for resolution to be achieved was to write him an email of what we had tried and what we were trying to achieve so we were all on the same page. I did this. A day or so later I received an email from another Tech saying he was taking over my SR because the first Tech was on leave for a while. The second Tech did not have a copy of the email I sent the first. So, yesterday I am working with the new Tech on our Certificate Issue, but all he ended up doing was sending me TID's to read. I have RTFM'd everything I can find on Certificates and Netware Cluster and Resources. We have beaten ourselves about the head on this issue.... When opening an SR should I expect someone to sit there and search through the knowledge base which I have already done, or should I be working with a Tech that actually knows how to resolve the issue? My expectation is the later of the two....

Phillip, sorry we're not making good progress. Sounds like we need a more experienced Support Engineer working with you. Call into the Support line, 1-800-858-4000, and ask to talk to the Mgr. Review the details with the Mgr and they can get a person assigned. This might even need to be escalated to the Backline team, but the Mgr can help determine this with you.
Regards,
-Todd
Todd Abney
Technical Support Director
Novell

Stock trasport order

Hi all,
When we convert stock trasport order to delivery in R/3, APO creates purchase order with zero quantity automatically. What can be the problem. Do you have an idea?
Thanks,
Burak
Edited by: burak gocer on Sep 9, 2008 1:07 PM

Hi Burak,
It appears to be a CIF issue. We had a somewhat similar one there were POs in APO with 0 quantity. I don't remember the Note implemented for this. Check CIF related SAP Notes.
Regards,
Manjit

Transparant WAFS - 4.1

I'm having some issue with sites being timed our connecting to remote file servers when CIFS AO is enabled in 4.1, the problem goes away if we disable the WAE or the CIFS AO. I'm also noticing some major slow down on my CM since upgrading. So I'm wondering if they are related. Since CIFS connections are now automatically configured and optimized, how much of this is reliant on the CM. Could by environment of 115 WAEs be overloading the CM (512 1GB mem), with all the automated CIFS setups, and could the clients be getting timed out since the CM is unable to setup the automatic CIFS connections in a timely manner. Its strange, as sometimes the connections work with a hitch, but most times they don't.
Thanks

Richard,
I wouldn't focus on the CM for your CIFS issue, since it is not involved in the connection setup.
Can you tell me the exact symptoms (error messages, etc.) you are having with CIFS connections?
Thanks,
Zach

CIF issue on EP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for