CIFS share limitation

I have a problem with the CIFS shares on the 7000-series...
On our Windows server, I have a directory for the Marketing department, to which they have full access. Inside this is a directory containing all their public documentation, which I share out (read-only) to everyone in the company. I don't seem to be able to replicate this on the Sun simulator - it tells me it's not allowed.
It appears that in the Sun world, a filesystem is the equivalent of a share and there is no further, finer level of sharing. Every share must be a root share, but why? That's like limiting a Windows server to sharing the root of a drive and no more.
Other NAS solutions have the ability to nest shares within a filesystem, so why not Sun?
I could probably use DFS on the Windows server to map shares into the correct structure, but the whole point of us getting a NAS box is to remove the need for the Windows server.
Any suggestions? :)

I have the same problem so I think I will try to explain it from my point of view and see if we get any comments.
I have a Real Strorage 7110 (Try & Buy)
What my windows guys would like and what they do already on Windows Systems:
Real Disk Layout = G:\shome\username
share "shome" => G:\shome (Default ACL)
User (Owner) = Full Access=rwx+inheritance
Other = x+inheritance
Domain Admin = Full Access=rwx+inheritanceshare "username" => G:\shome\username (Default ACL)
Inherit from above (shome)
Group Staff = rx+inheritanceBy the looks the Sun way is to setup up every share with all the relevant ACL, since you can not setup ACL on the directory above (project). Am I correct
Real Disk layout /export/shome/username
share "username"
User (Owner) = Full Access=rwx+inheritance
Other = x+inheritance
Domain Admin = Full Access=rwx+inheritance
Group Staff = rx+inheritanceThanks
Andrew

Similar Messages

  • Cannot mount multiple CIFS shares in /home

    I have 2 users, Joe and Fred, who each have their own directory in /home.  I also have a Netapp filer with a CIFS share called CorpData, which has subdirectories for Joe and Fred.
    On the Arch Linux box, I have this for my fstab:
    # /etc/fstab: static file system information
    # <file system> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
    # /dev/sda1
    UUID=d93def89-7611-43c8-a74f-e20bee64bd7e / ext4 rw,relatime 0 1
    //10.1.1.141/CorpData/joe /home/joe cifs credentials=/etc/credentials,noserverino,_netdev,uid=joe,gid=users 0 0
    //10.1.1.141/CorpData/fred /home/fred cifs credentials=/etc/credentials,noserverino,_netdev,uid=fred,gid=users 0 0
    The problem is that at boot time, Joe's directory will be mounted, but Fred's will not.  The reverse is true if I reverse the two entries in fstab.
    If I issue the "mount -a" command after logging in, the second mount does get mounted, but also generates this error message:
    mount error(16): Device or resource busy
    Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
    I did refer to man mount, but since only the second mount is failing, I don't know what I could try differently.  There are many more directories in CorpData, so I don't want to just mount that entire share on /home.

    Looking into this further, it seems that the server is not able to accept the second request so quickly after the first.  Is there any way to insert a delay or sleep command between the two mount entries in fstab?

  • Can't add CIFS Share from iManager on OES

    I recently install OES and have not been able to add a CIFS share from
    iManager .
    The error is:
    Error: The given volume name could not be found on the specified server.
    I've tried entering the path is various ways:
    \vol1\share\
    \vol1\share
    vol1\share\
    vol1\share
    vol1:\share\
    I've recreated the Pool and now have the volume name "VOLUME1" but still no
    success.
    Logger Screen reports:
    GadgetManager......2796 Could not find resource file mapping for stylesheet:
    NSSMgmt.xsl
    GadgetManager......2796 Could not find resource file mapping for stylesheet:
    NSSMgmt.xsl
    Trying NCP protocol
    Any suggestions?
    Thank you.
    Marc

    The source of the CIFS issue is the cluster snapin.
    The CIFS functionally is included in the cluster snapin for cluster
    services version 1.6 (NetWare 6.0) and 1.7 (NetWare 6.5).
    Unfortunately, with Cluster Services 1.8 (OES and NetWare 6.5 SP3),
    Novell dropped the CIFS functionality from the cluster snapin. So when
    you install an OES/NetWare server, or when you install SP3 to an
    existing Server, you will loose the CIFS snapin.
    Note that reinstalling SP3 will not bring you back the CIFS
    functionality as it is actually the cause of the disappearence.
    To get back the CIFS functionality, you have to get the NCS 1.7 cluster
    snapins. The latest version of these snapins can be found in NW65SP2 in
    the file NCS.ZIP. Unpack these file somewhere and use the files NCS.JAR
    and NCSRES.JAR from this ZIP file to replace the corresponding files of
    your ConsoleOne installation.
    Marcel Cox
    http://support.novell.com/forums

  • Unable to access CIFS shares using SSL Web portal

    Hello,
    i have deployed Cisco Clientless Web VPN on my ASA5515.
    I'm having an issue when I try to browse a file server (access CIFS shares) from the WEB VPN portal.   I am prompted for login, and after logging in  I get the "Error contacting host" immediately. it's seem like a bug on ASA ? i saw that on Cisco Web site : bug CSCsl94183
    I already DONE those things :
    1- reload the ASA
    2- upgrade to the latest software release
    3- test different web browser ( Firefox, IE, Chrome)
    1- ASA Platform is 5515 running  latest software release (9.1.4)
    2- File  server running Windows 2008 R2
    3- Clients is using Firefox.
    4- When I establish SSL VPN connection using Cisco AnyConnect I  have no problems accessing files or folders on the same server.
    NOTE :  I have 2 other CIFS server running  Window 2003 and there is no issue.  the issue is happening ONLY  with the server running Window 2008 R2

    I've also seen this exact problem. We have several Windows 2008 R2 servers, one of our Domain controllers has been migrated to 2008 R2. I can access shares on the Windows 2008 R2 domain controller, but not a deicated (member) file share server. 

  • [SOLVED]Setting up Arch to read CIFS shares but no smb.conf

    I am trying to ACCESS CIFS shares from another computer. Other clients can access these shares without issue. I am NOT trying to host files from Arch.
    Reading I have done: wiki pages on SAMBA and SMBCLIENT.
    Reading the SMBCLIENT wiki page, it apparently states that only the package smbclient should be installed, which I did.
    But, following the SMBCLIENT wiki, it shows to issue:
    #smbclient -L
    #smbclient
    both error saying smb.conf can not be read. BTW, is the -L to just list the shares available from any place?
    Questions:
    1. So, should smb.conf be created to use smbclient? This package evidently does not install smb.conf in any form.
    2. Does the SAMBA package need to be installed to use smbclient? Samba does install a smb.conf.something.
    Any tips you have so I can read CIFS shares will be appreciated.
    Thanks
    steve.
    Last edited by stevepa (2012-11-30 03:22:49)

    Reporting my results at resolving my issues
    1. installing smbclient provides the described ftp-like environment while accessing CIFS shares. It works fine. I used
    $smbclient //OMV/steve -Usteve%omv
    to access my share on the OMV server. I could list, get and put files. I still get the message about no smb.conf file but it works.
    2. Installing gvfs-smb package allowed Thunar to display the shares. In my case, I do a Ctrl-L and then smb://OMV/steve and I can display the shared content perfectly! Click to remember password or it apparently does not work.
    Hope this helps someone.
    Steve.

  • Cannot access CIFS shares from Windows 2008R2 on NSS3000

    Hi,
    I am trying to upgrade our 2008 domain to 2008R2 but with that last version we cannot access to cifs shares on the NSS3000. Access from all other clients are OK. It was 100% OK under 2008...
    Whether I use the IP or the FQDN, I got an error from Windows 2008R2. From IP, I got "No process is on the other end of pipe." and from network Gui, I got "Windows cannot access \\nas0026CB647BC6. Check the spelling of the name...blabla. Details : Error Code : 0x80070035, The network path was not found".
    On the NAS, I got this errors in the cifs logs :
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine WIN2008-PDC.bluemoon.holywell.leics pipe \NETLOGON fnum 0x4002returned critical error. Error was NT_STATUS_PIPE_DISCONNECTED 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: [2011/02/24 14:12:45, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(790) 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine WIN2008-PDC.bluemoon.holywell.leics pipe \NETLOGON fnum 0x4002returned critical error. Error was NT_STATUS_PIPE_DISCONNECTED 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: [2011/02/24 14:12:45, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(790) 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine WIN2008-PDC.bluemoon.holywell.leics pipe \NETLOGON fnum 0x4002returned critical error. Error was NT_STATUS_PIPE_DISCONNECTED 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: [2011/02/24 14:12:45, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(790) 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine WIN2008-PDC.bluemoon.holywell.leics pipe \NETLOGON fnum 0x4002returned critical error. Error was NT_STATUS_PIPE_DISCONNECTED 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: [2011/02/24 14:12:45, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(790) 
    Feb 24 14:12:45 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine WIN2008-PDC.bluemoon.holywell.leics pipe \NETLOGON fnum 0x4002returned critical error. Error was NT_STATUS_PIPE_DISCONNECTED 
    Feb 24 14:12:48 NAS0026cb647bc6 winbindd[28457]: [2011/02/24 14:12:48, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(790) 
    It is likely to be an incompatibility between Windows 2008R2 smbv2 and the NSS3000 smbd but I can't find any firmware update and I can't find the process to allow in the registry.
    I can ping it, I can connect on the web interface, I can connect on FTP but no CIFS at all.
    Firmware version running is 1.20.1. Hardware rev : V03.
    Any idea?

    Hi SpaceBass, have you looked into sharepoints or into Netinfo manager. I have been playing around with sharepoints and it does let me enter non local users into the sharing prefs- albeit manually. Only thing is , depending on the number of macs you have, it could be a long and tedious job entering it all by hand. Netinfo may have an easier way, I'll do some more digging and post back.
    Cheers.

  • Random error accessing CIFS shares from Windows

    I am setting up some CIFS shares to be used from Windows clients and in the process I had some random problems accessing the shares.
    In hope of finding the answer I checked the CIFS Service and the Active Directory Service, and while watching the screen for Active Directory Service I saw that the "Selected Domain Controller" changed from one to another. I now stayed within this screen and noticed that the "Selected Domain Controller" continued to change and then I found the problem, because an unknown Domain Controller appeared. The IP was 216.150.17.8
    I found that when ever this Domain Controller was the selected one, all access to CIFS shares from Windows clients failed! This is correct, because the 216.150.17.8 of course is unaware of all users in Our Domain
    So the Questions are:
    - what is happening?
    - and how to solve this?
    - why is a Domain Controller 216.150.17.8 sometimes the Selected Controller?
    - where does this 216.150.17.8 come from?
    Have You seen anything like this?

    I now have found out why the DC changes - it is because the CIFS service is restarting ;-(
    This is a log snip
    2009-5-14 09:24:53 Executing start method ("exec /usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start").
    2009-5-14 09:24:53 Executing stop method (:kill).
    2009-5-14 09:24:53 Stopping because all processes in service exited.
    2009-5-14 09:24:39 Method "start" exited with status 0.
    2009-5-14 09:23:48 Executing start method ("exec /usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start").
    smbd: NetBIOS services started
    2009-5-14 09:23:48 Executing stop method (:kill).
    2009-5-14 09:23:48 Stopping because all processes in service exited.
    2009-5-14 09:23:34 Method "start" exited with status 0.
    It seems to happen when I access the share and thereby force a uservalidation
    Any ideas?

  • Error Referencing Old CIFS Shares

    Previously I used to use CIFS to connect to my shares on my NV+, but I've switched to AFP.
    For some reason, something in Lion is still trying to get the CIFS shares and so when I open random applications such as Garage Band and others that use the media inspector to let me browse audio and picture files, I get an annoying error pop up that won't go away unless I close down the application. I'm trying to figure out where this old share is being referenced and how I can remove whatever reference there is so I can quit getting the pop up errors.
    The system log shows this when I get the error...
    10/11/11 3:09:22.142 AM NetAuthSysAgent: smb_mount: mount failed to nas-mccordnet (CIFS)._smb._tcp.local/pictures, syserr = No such file or directory
    Is there a file that references these shares that I can delete or edit?

    hwoess,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://www.novell.com/support and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com

  • Accessing Windows CIFS Shares via Nautilus

    Hi,
    I've recently installed and configured Solaris 11, am having problems accessing Windows CIFS shares via Nautilus.
    I've installed both samba (needed for CUPS to print to printers connect to a windows pc) and smb/client. The smb/client and samba services are running. The smb/server service is not installed.
    I can print to any printer on the windows PC I'm trying to access via Nautilus, so I know my username/password for accessing the pc are correct.
    I can also manually mount any share on the windows PC via the cli (eg mount -F smfs -o user=elin //elink/users /mnt), and browse the files directly that way, except the file permisssions don't seem to align with any unix user. Again this just shows that the username/password combination is ok.
    For Samba, I'm using the default smb.conf file as /etc/samba/samba.conf. Workgroup is set to WORKGROUP in smb.conf.
    On the Windows pc, in the security event viewer, I can see the auth request, however is failing with bad password (event ID 4776, error code 0x006a). In the default group policy object for networking, I've set to accept "LM & NT, NTLMv2 when neogiatated", as this allows legacy clients to connect. (Legacy meaning NT4, Win95, etc, and also has the benefit of allowing other OSes to connect as well).
    I'm also able to access the WIndows PC CIFS shares from an Arch Linux based setup (running GNOME 3.2 w/ Nautilus 3.2), so I doubt it's the Windows side of things causing the problems. Additionally, when I was running Solaris 10u9 (just before upgrading to Sol11), I was able to access the shares via Nautilus as well.
    So my question is:
    1. Does Nautilus use Samba or the Oracle smb/client service to handle mount windows CIFS shares?
    2. What log files or configuration files do I need to looking at to help with this error?
    As a side question,
    I've found that on a clean installation running the "Print Manager" accesses CUPS fine, but once you install a printer, it'll no longer connect to CUPS, unless run from the cli "sudo system-config-printers". So this is a permissions issue, where's the best place to fix/handle that one.

    Replying to my own thread, as I have a possible but very-hackish solution.
    To add some further details to my original post.
    There are 4 PCs on the LAN.
    1. Hellfire - OS = Solaris 11 11/11
    2. Brimstone - OS = Arch Linux
    3. Elink - OS = Win7 Pro x64 SP1
    4. IsaacPC - OS = WinXP Home SP3
    Attempting to connect to Elink from Hellfire, accessing CIFS shares via Nautulis fails. (Mounting shares via Nautulis fails, but works fine from CLI using 'mount' command which to my understanding uses the smb/client service to work). Elink also hosts all the printers on the LAN, a HP LJ1200 and an Epson Fax/Printer/Scanner.
    Helfire does attempt to authenticate, as listed in the event logs on the Win7 PC (elink), but is returning bad password when using Nautulis. (but printing from hellfire to either printer on elink works fine, as does mounting CIFS shares using 'mount').
    Booting the live CD of Solaris 11, also exhibits the same non-working behaviour when attempting to mount CIFS shares in Nautulis.
    Attempting to access CIFS shares on elink from Brimstone (via Nautulis 3.2 within GNOME 3.2), or from IsaacPC works fine.
    Hellfire configuration.
    Samba is installed, but NOT running (samba is needed for accessing the printers on elink, as CUPS needs smbspool which is part of the samba package), and the native smb/client service is also running.
    smb.conf is a direct copy of the default *.conf file, except the WORKGROUP is set to 'WORKGORUP'. There is a symlink to smb.conf in /etc/sfw/smb.conf -> /etc/samba/smb.conf
    Onto the hackish-fix.
    I've noticed that there are 2 copies of libsmbclient.so installed on the system, one in /usr/sfw/lib (part of the "libsmbclient" package) and another in /usr/lib/samba (part of the "samba" package).
    "libsmbclient" appears to be based on samba 3.5.8 codebase, and is linked to the gvfsd-smb daemon (this is the software that Nautulis uses to talk SMB to access CIFS shares).
    "samba" is based on the samba 3.5.10 codebase, and it's installation has nothing to do with GNOME or Nautulis in any manner.
    Using any of the samba included tools to test SMB/CIFS functions, work with 1 minor exception (which I'll list below). eg, using smbclient I can list all shares on any PC on the LAN, etc.
    So as a hunch, I renamed the libsmbclient.so.0 in /usr/sfw/lib, and symlinked /usr/sfw/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 -> /usr/lib/samba/libsmbclient.so.0 (so that gvfsd-smb is linked against the slightly newer version of the libsmbclient.so as included in the samba package located in /usr/lib/samba).
    I rebooted Hellfire, and now I'm able to access CIFS shares via Nautulis, provided that some form of authentication is needed (that is a username and password is needed - guest access and blanks passwords don't work - but these IMO should be disabled immediately as part of a baseline security package in regards to Windows - so no harm there).
    Now to the minor exception I noted earlier. When using smbclient to actually connect and transfer files, I get:
    ld.so.1: smbclient: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/libreadline.so.5: symbol tgetent: referenced symbol not found
    As far as I know, tgetent is part of libtermcap.so, so I guess when building smbclient or libreadline.so, the link reference to termcap was left out? (or something like that). Anyway, that's another issue...

  • Read-only CIFS share--5320 NAS Gateway Cluster

    Is it possible to share CIFS shares read-only using Active Directory authentication, then revert to normal read-write operation? We would like to make information available while we are finishing an incremental copy from an old data source.

    I have the same problem so I think I will try to explain it from my point of view and see if we get any comments.
    I have a Real Strorage 7110 (Try & Buy)
    What my windows guys would like and what they do already on Windows Systems:
    Real Disk Layout = G:\shome\username
    share "shome" => G:\shome (Default ACL)
    User (Owner) = Full Access=rwx+inheritance
    Other = x+inheritance
    Domain Admin = Full Access=rwx+inheritanceshare "username" => G:\shome\username (Default ACL)
    Inherit from above (shome)
    Group Staff = rx+inheritanceBy the looks the Sun way is to setup up every share with all the relevant ACL, since you can not setup ACL on the directory above (project). Am I correct
    Real Disk layout /export/shome/username
    share "username"
    User (Owner) = Full Access=rwx+inheritance
    Other = x+inheritance
    Domain Admin = Full Access=rwx+inheritance
    Group Staff = rx+inheritanceThanks
    Andrew

  • No Cifs Share in Open File Dialog of Device Manager

    Hello,
    I just copied lots of driver-files to a Cifs-share and connected to that share over the explorer just to recognize, that the
    Device Manager - Driver Open File Dialog
    does not show any Shares, just the local HDs and the Network.
    Is there any workaround on this, so that the Open File Dialog shows the Shares?
    thx,
    hugo

    Hi,
    First make sure that you successfully share the files out.
    http://doc.freenas.org/index.php/Windows_(CIFS)_Shares
    form this article, there is a "Browsable to Network Clients" option,  it enables Windows clients to browse the shared directory using Windows Explorer.  
    You can also try to directly type the UNC path of the cifs share in the explorer to search the share, verify whether it exists.
    NOTE:
    This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you.
    Microsoft
    does not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
    Yolanda
    TechNet Community Support

  • Failure of ACL setting for CIFS share resource on Windows client logined with administrator account

    Hi,
      We accounter a puzzle of ACL setting for a CIFS share resource. In our application, we use the
    administrator account to login a Windows 7 OS which is used as the CIFS client. We can access the share resource by "\\server_ip" on  this CIFS client,  but we can't add
    a new ACE to the ACL of a CIFS share resource provided by a CIFS server.
    Why dose this hanppen? Note that the CIFS server maybe a Windows OS or a self-developed CIFS server. 
      The operation details as followed:
    1.Access the share resource by "\\server_ip", login the CIFS server by a valid account on the CIFS server.
    2.On the Windows client, select the "Security" panel in the mouse-right-button properties dialog of a cifs share resource.
    3.To add a new ACE for someone eg. user0, we input "user0" in the "Select Users ans Groups" dialog popped up.
    4.Click OK, but the Windows client will not get the user information for user0 from the CIFS server.
    WHY?
    5.By wireshare network trace, we find the Windows client didn't send any SAMR requests to the CIFS server.
    6.Restart the Windows client OS and login again with another account except administrator, carry out the above operations. We find that the Windows client can get the user information, opposite with the step 4 above.
    WHY?
    7.By wireshare network trace, we find that the Windows client has sent SAMR requests to the CIFS server to get user informations. But that is different from step 5,  WHY?
    If the Windows client OS is login with administrator account, is there any configuration on Windows client to decide whether request user information on CIFS server when setting ACL for CIFS share resource?
    Expect your help.Thanks.
    Best wishes.

    The purpose of this forum is to support the Open Specifications documentation. You can read about the Microsoft Open Specifications program here,
    http://www.microsoft.com/openspecifications/en/us/default.aspx
    The library of Open Specification documents is located here,
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd208104.aspx
    It doesn’t appear that you are implementing one of the protocols cited.  Your question may be more applicable to Technet's Windows Server Platform Networking forum at
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=winserverPN or the File Services and Storage forum at
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=winserverfiles.
    If you are working on implementing a protocol using the specifications cidet above, please provide more detail.
    Bryan S. Burgin Senior Escalation Engineer Microsoft Protocol Open Specifications Team

  • Weblogic Start-up from CIFS share(WINDOWS 2008) is too slow.

    Hi All,
    We are migrating to a new platform in weblogic 10.3.5. It is running on a WINDOWS 2008 Server and we are planning to use the "Whole Server" migration.
    As per our new architecture, we have planned to use NAS over CIFS as a storage medium.
    We have placed all the binaries, jars ,JDK files and weblogic core server files,WL_HOME in the "Local Disk" and admin,Managed servers, Filestore and all files related to domain in the CIFS share.
    Now, when we start-up the servers without any deployment, it takes almost 5 mins for the server to come-up in "running" mode.
    We are bit in a jeopardy now as to whether the architecture and the set-up is appropriate for weblogic over CIFS (or) not?
    Any advice (or) suggestions on this setup would be helpful.
    (PS: We have found out why the server is taking too long to start-up. When we observe the TCP-IP dump during the server start-up, there were thousands of requests(includes JVM DLL files,exe,weblogic class files, core server class files) sent to the File-server using SMB protocol. Unfortunatley, all those files are present in the "Local DIsk". Hence, we could see that the firts request is sent to the File server, got failed and then the file is being read from the local-disk.)
    Thanks,
    SV.

    Put only files which needs to be 'shared' ( e.g persistent store files for jms, jta transaction store etc) on the network drive .. put all other files including logs on the local disk.. see if that makes a difference..
    NAS is slower than other storage setups like SAN and DAS...

  • Datapump via passwordless CIFS share to ZFS appliance

    Hello,
    In a project I'm involved in we want to export Oracle databases on Windows via datapump directly to a ZFS appliance.
    However datapump run's on the system account so we cannot use drive letters to the CIFS share. UNC path's should be possible however this should be passwordless.
    Anybody an idea how to setup passwordless CIFS shares on a ZFS Appliance.
    Regards,
    Laurens

    I have the same problem on a CMSDK db and a ASDB in a Portal enviroment whit CIFS and SSO.
    On Windows 2003 server datapump have the two errors
    CMSDK Database
    ORA-31693: Table data object "CMSDK"."ODMM_CONTENTSTORE" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
    ORA-06564: object EXP_DP does not exist
    ORA-31693: Table data object "CMSDK"."ODMM_NONINDEXEDSTORE" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
    ORA-06564: object EXP_DP does not exist
    ASDB Database
    ORA-31693: Table data object "PORTAL"."WWNLS_STRINGS$" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
    ORA-06564: object EXP_DP does not exist
    ORA-31693: Table data object "ORASSO"."WWNLS_STRINGS$" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
    ORA-06564: object EXP_DP does not exist
    Regards

  • CIFS share authentication is slow

    The problem I’m having is when accessing a CIFS share authentication is taking several minutes. The Mac OS is LION and I’m connecting via SMB to a share on NetApp storage using a local account on the NetApp. Are there any options I could change in LION that would speed up authentication?

    Hi
    I have similar issue. Ldap 5.1 crashes after upgrade from siteminder 4.61 to 5.5. But if i remove the certain indexes, it does not crash, but LDAP becomes very slow due to unindexed search.
    If you get any solution..pls inform us too.
    Thanks in advance
    [email protected]
    chennai

Maybe you are looking for