CIN: Alteration of base value for CST in TAXINN

Hi,
In our business process there is a requirement that CST should not be calculated only on Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) rather base value for CST should be Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) + 2 Additional Surcharges as mentioned below:
Basic Price     100.00
BED (10%)     10.00
Ecess (2%)     0.20
SEcess (1%) 0.10
Additional Surcharge1     4.00
Additional Surcharge2     6.00
Base for CST 120.30 (100100.20.14+6)
CST (2%)     2.41 (2% of 120.30)
Total Value     122.71
The tax procedure being used is TAXINN
Is there any standard routine or subtotal available so that by using this in PO Calculation Schema and TAXINN the base value of CST can be modified as desired?
Please provide some useful ideas.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Sapdear on Aug 29, 2011 8:22 AM

Hi,
The additional surcharges are condition types in the calculation schema of PO whereas CST is being calculated in Tax Procedure TAXINN so how "From" and "To" functionality can work. The surcharges are getting calculated in PO Pricing and CST in tax procedure TAXINN (both at different places)
We want to use a tax code (BED10%Ecess2%SEcess1%+CST2%) to calculate Excise Duties and CST by additional surcharges taking into account.
Can any one provide some idea to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance

Similar Messages

Base value for excise duty

Hello All,
Base value for Excise duty and different service tax. calculated with the BASB condition type.
can we change the the base value pick up method.
Means i dont want to pick this value fron Net (gross price less discount).
I want to have this value from Calculated Net value with considering freight charge and less discount.
is it possible to change,
Abhinay Waikar.

Hi,
Assign subtotal "5" against the freight condition types in MM calculation schema and then try.

Excise base value for CVD Calculation in Import depot pricing?

Hi,
In case of Import procedure the condition base value which is copying to excise should be sum of assessable value + Basic customs but it is not happening..
kindly suggest me on the same..
regards,

Hi
for custome invoice valu will be
1) IN CVD
2) ECESS on CVD (%)
3) SHECESS on CVD (%)
4) additinal
5) IN Basic customs
6)Custom's Edu Cess
7)Sec ECESS ON Customs
out of these
1 t0 4 will be in excise invoice
1)chek in po tax code 0
2)chek following setting in spro-
Logistic general-tax on goods movement-account determination-specifiy exciseaccounts per trasnction and psecify excise gruopper transction chek IP here for you Grop setting
3) chek condiiton type with accuralse and account key is there or not
GRPO IP CR CLEAR
GRPO IP DR MSUSP
GRPO IP DR ONHOLD
GRPO IP DR PLAAED
GRPO IP DR PLAAT1
GRPO IP DR PLABED
GRPO IP DR PLACESS
GRPO IP DR PLAECS
GRPO IP DR RG23AED
GRPO IP DR RG23AT1
GRPO IP DR RG23BED
GRPO IP DR RG23ECS
GRPO IP DR RG23SED
EWPO IP CR CLEAR
EWPO IP DR PLAECS
EWPO IP DR RG23AED
EWPO IP DR RG23AT1
EWPO IP DR RG23BED
EWPO IP DR RG23ECS
EWPO IP DR RG23SED
Regards
Kailas ugale

Sub total column in MM pricing and Base value for tax

Hi,
In MM pricing in M/08 for the condition we can use subtotal filed for multiple conditions if we use same subtotal fileds the value of all condition will be added in the define subtotal filed, so this is only effect of subtotal or it has also some othere effect, second think which I want to know in PO after PBXX we have some custom condition for Surcharge % (Item) whatever % we maintain in this the tax amount is calculated on the addition of PBXX and Surcharge % (Item, this is oK as per our requirement, but in M/08 for Surcharge % (Item ) the subtotal field os blank, also in OBQ3 Fi pricing for the Condition BASB the column for Alternative formula for condition base value ALSO Condition formula for alternative calculation type are also blank then How system found the BASB value as the adition of PBXX and Surcharge %, what is nasic rule behind this for the BASB value calculation.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
Thakns for your reply, In our existing system, in tax procedure 362/363 is not maintain, so in case this is not maintain, which value is considered as the base price.
regards,
zafar

Base value for Excise calculation

Hi SD Gurus,
Is <b>Excise duty</b> calculated on the basis of gross value of the material.?? what happens in case there is some discount given to the customer? Pleae confirm.
Does <b>assement value</b> is considered for evaluating the excise duty..??
Gupta.P

Hi Gupta,
The base value needs to be declared by the company to the excise department. Based on this value the excise duty is calculated. Irrespective the discount given the excise duty is to be computed on the base value
prasanna

How to define maximum base value for vehicle.

Hi.
Could you clearify me why I can't fix maximum value for vehicles (1,000,000)
I already did configure as below:
IMG>> FI >> Asset Accounting >> Depreciation >> Valuation methods >> Dep key >> Caculation method >> Define maximun amount method
then assign to asset class by
IMG>> FI >> Asset Accounting >> Depreciation >> Valuation methods >> further setting >> Define maximun base value
after that I test maximum value and display value but I found that amount that use to calculate dep dosen't be 1,000,000
where is the mistake and how can I fix it ?
Thank you in advance
Best regards,
Utarat.

Hi Utarat,
I assume you have linked this maximum amount methods to the depreciation key   > AFAMA (V_T090NA-METHBT).
Please check also the amounts entered as maximun amount and if you have flagged the fiels XKUMU (read the documentation on it F1)
Have you set any maximun base value that can affect the calculations (Transaction OAW2)?
Note 1048448 could be helpful.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Sep 29, 2010 8:51 PM

Base Value for Imports

All SAP Gurus,
While capturing / posting excise invoice for Imports, which value to be considered as base value?
Is it the value of material only or some duties and other costs to be added over it to consider it as base value?
In our case material value + BCD is displayed as base value, while capturing / posting excise invoice.
Is it correct?
If we want to take some more conditions (or delete some conditions) from being calculating as Base amount, what should be done?
Please reply.
Regards,

Find the fin. acct, entry genrated by system with end of every transaction and Import Business Process.
1. Create PO, in contion tab of PO , maintaint all possible Bill of entry coponent and assigned it with custom vendor.
2. Create MIRO for custom vendor ( Planned delivery cost)
FI Entry of Import( Planned Delivery Cost)
1 K 2001000 customs 60,592.36- INR
2 S 2027100 CVD Clearing 336.07INR
3 S 2025000Customs Provision 9,845.38INR
4 S 2025000Customs Provision 985.38INR
5 S 2027100CVD Clearing 33,606.65INR
6 S 2027100CVD Clearing 672.13INR
7 S 2025000Customs Provision 492.69INR
8 S 2025000Customs Provision1 4,654.06 INR
3. Create GR for Excisble /non-excisable mat.
for Materail
1 89 4002100 RM:coal 221,365.01 INR
2 96 2021000 Provisional Liab-GR 195,387.50- INR
3 50 2025000 Customs Provision 14,654.06- INR
4 50 2025000 Customs Provision 985.38- INR
5 50 2025000 Customs Provision 492.69- INR
6 50 2025000 Customs Provision 9,845.38- INR
for Excise
1 40 4610410 RG 23A-Higher Ed Ces 336.07 INR V0
2 40 4610100 RG 23A-BED 33,606.65 INR V0
3 40 4610400 RG 23A-Ed Cess 672.13 INR V0
4 50 2027100 CVD Clearing 34,614.85- INR V0
4. create MIRO for importer liab.
FI for Vendor( Importer)
1 K 2001000 test / 195,387.50- INR
2 S 2021000 Provisional Liab 195,387.50 INR
so as per the example the base base value will be 195,387.50
regards
kunal
award if helpful

Wrong Condition base value for Z Condition

I have activated smartform Y640_SDORC_A and everything has the right value except for a Z condition based on weight.
If for example the weight is 30 kilos it shows 300 kilos.
Althought it has the wrong base quantity everything else gets copied ok, and the total its correct.
Does anyone know where should I check why is taking the value 10 times?
Thanks
Regards,
Carlos

Hi Carlos,
this program is probably working with fixed decimals (attributes of program) -> all amount fields have two decimals. KG is defined with 3 decimals (per customizing, might be changed) -> conversion is done by write, when the currency-option is used. If you calculate values, you have to take care of the decimal-shifting yourself.
Best regards, Christian

Change of base value for calculation of Excise.

Hi All,
I have a senario which needs to be maaped in SAP. Please help in maaping the senario.
We are purchasing Oil from manufacturer like IOCL & HPCL. The contract is such that, the excise is calculated on the proce of the oil on the day the chalan has been created. Eg:-
Contract base price is 100
Ed@ 14.42% 14.42
But on the day of despatch the base price is 110, hence the excise will be calculated on 110 only not on 100.
So in PO we want to maintain a condition apart from basic price PBXX and PB00 on which only the excise will be calculated. The excise shouldnt be calculated on PBXX & PB00.
So please tell me how to map this in pricing procedure using routine.
Regards,
Mohar

Hi,
I hope your requirement can be met using the manual Excise condition - JEXC in MM Pricing Procedure by maintaining the subtotal as 5.
Enter the JEXC condition in PO Item condition manually & enter the amount on which excise needs to be calculated.
Based on subtotal 5 the value will flow to tax procedure automatically & excise will be calculated on the same.
Hope its clear.
Thanks & Regards,

Base Value change for CST calculation

Hi,
I've a requirement that CST should get calculated on an assessible value and not on Net Price in the PO. e.g.
Basic Price: 100
BED@10%: 10
ECess@2%: 2
SHECess@1%: 1
Subtotal 1: 113
Assessible Value for CST: 90
CST@4%: 3.60
Total: 116.60
How can we change base value for CST calculation in Tax Procedure?
We are using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
Manoj

Hi All,
I got the solution for my issue so closing the thread.
I changed the Tax procedure.Add two new condition types, one for Assesseble value for CST calculation and another one which is a copy of JVCS(CST condition).In case when no assesseble value is maintained, new condition type for CST will be zero.
Regards.
Manoj

Creation of a new Formula Routine for condition base value calculation

hello people,
i am stuck up in a situation where SAP has itself said that nothing can be done.
but i know you all can guide me to some way or the other
see, the scenario is like this
1. i have to calculate the base value for a pricing condition.
which will follow the formula
net value + excise duty + freight
2. in standard routines two things are normally bieng used
xkwert for the value that has to be finally calculated(taking reference of routine 004)
komp-netwr for the net value
3. i have to calculate the excise duty by adding up all the base values of existing pricing conditions like JMOP, JEC1 etc that i have which i saw in internal table
XKOMV on debugging
4. now freight is to be calculated from all the values of condition types that are in KOMP which is a structure and no internal table is defined in standard main program
now ppl
can you guide me by looking at the standard program
what is this xkwert field and where it is assigning the value.
how to get field from other structure and table.
please guide as to how to approach the problem.
thanks and regards
Nitin

HI,
the scenario u r talking abt is condition based value formuls of VOFM transaction.
here the data is retrieved as 'X' structures and will hold normal tables with respective names. and in this case all the pricing data is in KOMV ie XKOMV
Final amount including tax
form frm_kond_basis_004.
xkwert = komp-netwr + komp-mwsbp.
endform.
always calulation is done in xkwert field and final value is stoerd in xkomv.
*.................. text ............................................. *
Condition base value formula to get the assessable value of the     *
saleable material from j_1iassval. If the value is not maintained   *
then the selling price will be taken as the base                    *
TABLES: J_1IASSVAL.
DATA XXKOMV LIKE KOMV .
XXKOMV = XKOMV.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM J_1IASSVAL WHERE J_1IWERKS = KOMP-WERKS AND
                                     J_1IMATNR = KOMP-MATNR.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
    IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP NE 0.
    XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
    ENDIF.
    IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS NE 0.
    XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.
   XKWERT = XXKOMV-KAWRT .
ENDIF .
XKOMV = XXKOMV .
ENDFORM.
and as far as ur req select allthe condition type data and sum and take the average value and pass it.

Asset value for Calculation of Tax Depreciation

We have been told that many of the assets created as of 1/1/2008 have a different (lower) tax value than their beginning book value. Book value is correct for standard book depreciation.     Is there a process to update the tax value of assets created in SAP similar to the transaction AS92 used to update values for Converted Assets?
It was suggested that we use the method of Unplanned Depreciation tcode ABAA with TTY 642/652 to change the tax value of the asset. When I tested this I found the various tax depreciation methods were calculated based on the beginning book value for year 1 and not using taking the special depreciation into consideration until subsequent years.   This is using Depreciation Area 10, MACRS, Dep. Key M200.
Is there a better method of altering asset book value for tax purposes or a better way to alter the tax depreciation calculation so it takes Unplanned Depreciation into consideration during year 1?
Current simplified tax depreciation example:
Beg. BV $1,000
unplanned dep posted $100
tax depreciation for year 1 $100
tax depreciation for years 2-10 $88.88
The preferred depreciation is $90 years 1 - 10.
Thanks for your assistance,
Jeff

I think I had the cart before the horse on this problem. The correct way to look at this is what is the best way to get the correct "Net Book Value" and not the correct tax depreciation posting as it never actually gets booked.
By knowing the incorrect Beginning BV, the rate depreciation is applied in year 1 and finally the desired Net BV value at the end of year 1 for tax purposes I am able to calculate the correct Unplanned Depreciation for tax to make everything work out correctly.
correct beginning tax BV $1,200
Beginning Asset Book Value $1,800
depreciation $360 (20% of BV)
Unplanned depreciation $?
Net BV for tax at end of Yr1 $960 ; or 1,200 - (1,200*.2)
With the know values above that makes my unplanned depreciation for Yr 1 to be $480. Year 1 and all following years depreciate correctly after the Unplanned Depreciation is posted.
I am marking this as resolved unless someone sees an error in my thinking.
Thanks,
Jeff

Excise Base value calculated wrongly in GR

Dear experts,
When preparing Bought out goods receipt in migo,excise base value is coming wrongly(not as per PO) in sometimes.
If we come back from the screen without saving & then try again. That time the base value is calculating correctly.
This kind of situation is arising inconsistantly. Not regularly.
Please suggest to overcome this issue.
Regards
M.Sarathi

Hi,
When we capture excise invoice in MIGO, SAP will default the excise base value for the total PO quantity.
For eg. if the total PO qty is 100, and if the price is 10 INR, then during MIGO, system will show 100*10 = 1000 INR.
Even if you have posted a partial GR of say 10 nos. already, and you are now trying to post the balance 90 nos in MIGO,
then also, system will suggest the base value as 1000 INR (instead of 900 INR). This is a bug in the excise tab.
Only option is to overwrite the base value manually as per the GR qty.
Regards
Prabhu

Update Excise base value in MRP based and Non-MRP based billing

Hi Gurus,
We need to update Excise Base Value for Statistical Condition type. How to configure the same ?
Sl.No Pricing Condition Type      Active   Statistical           Passed to Accounting
1        MRP Price (Statistical)
2        Abatement (Statistical)
3       Surcharge (Active&Passed to Accounting)
4      Assessabel value (Statistical)
(No:4 This is the base for calculating Excise duties i.e Excise Base Value)
5       List Price (Statistical)
6       Customer Discount(Statistical)
7      Surcharge(Active&Passed to Accounting)
8      Net Price (Active&Passed to Accounting)
9      BED   (Active&Passed to Accounting)
10    ECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
11   SECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
12   Total collected from Customer(Statistical)
Issue: When there is MRP Price higher than the List Price, then the Cutomer will be charged on the basis of Net Price only, but the duties amount to be paid to the government on MRP Price. so in this case I can not calculate Excise Duties on the Actual Net Price condition which is active and passed on to accounting. And always the Excise duties to be calculated on Assessable value(no:4). But that condition type if I make activate then it will pass to accounting and also getting added to the Net Value(KOMP-NETWR). How to come out of this situation.(as per the customer requirement both MRP based materials and non-MRP based materials are also considered in the same sale order i.e with the same pricing procedure).
Becasue of this EXBAS is not getting updated in the J_1IEXCDTL.
Gurus, Share your valuable experiences and suggestions.
Thanks &Regards
Sreekanth
09611147585

Dear Lakshmipathi,
As per your suggestion, I have maintained Material Assessable Value and then also the duty values are calculating on the basis of Assessable value maintained in the Pricing Procedure. It is not taking the Material Assessable Value into consideration. And it is not getting updated the Excise Base Value.
In which case Material Assessable value will be taken into consideration?
How to update the Excise Base Value in J_1IEXCDTL tables?
Thanks&Regards
Sreekanth

Condition Type JSRT not picking Condition Base Value in Pricing Procedure

Hi Friends,
In a procedure System is not picking condition base value for condition type JSRT. I have checked the tax procedure and found alternative Cal Type is 17 and is working fine for Domestic vendors.
Friends i need your help in sorting out this issue. Pls suggest what I can check in order to sort out this issue.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja

Hello!
In TAXINN the base value for the condition JSRT is picked up from step 100.
I suggest that you change the "From" value to 100 instead of whatever you may be using
Then test the transaction once again.This will not affect your normal service tax calculation either. So please make this change & try using S1 for planned delivery cost.
Hope this helps !
Cheers!
Plauto
Edited by: Plauto Abreu on Feb 11, 2011 9:03 PM

CIN: Alteration of base value for CST in TAXINN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for