CIN--MIGO--Wrong excise value

Hi Buddies,
We created STO from Plant to Plant and taken SD side to the delivery and profoma and then excise invoice.
In this case, we created one STO- with four deliveries(with partial quantity) -one proforma(combining all deliveries in one proforma invoice) and one excise invoice with refercencing the proforma in SD. While doing MIGO(goods receipt in MM), if we give delivery number and excise invoice number, automatically it is picking the last line item of excise invoice. All BED,ECESS,SCESS is calculating wrongly in MIGO.
We noted that, system is always picking that last delivery excise value for each and every delivery in MIGO.
Regards,
G.Rajesh.

hi
we also faced similar problem and we done the corrections in the userexit
Can you please go through the SAP note mentioned below and apply.
1042035
1035545
1003634
If you mark the Condition category as 'H' for the Price condition
which has the assesable value then the Excise base value will flow but the price condition should be non statistical, if it is statistical in
your pricing procedure then you will have use the user exit
J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE which has the KONV structure , you will
have to pass the value to the parameter EXCITM_BASE
hope it will help you in resolve the issue.
with regards
baalakrushnan.da

Similar Messages

Wrong Excise values posted in MIGO

Hi all,
This is Depot scenario.
User has posted wrong values in Excise tab in MIGO & posted GR. Excise values are updated in Table RG23D.
The same material is already disptached to the customer end.
Currently there is No stock of material in the system.
Now User wants to reverse all this wrong duties.
How to resolve this issue?
Pls suggest solution
Sameer

Hi,
Please reverse the material document in MIGO.
Regards,
Smitha

MIGO HEADER WRONG EXCISE VALUE

Hi,
While doing Migo with excise option, in the header excice tab, BED is calculating wrongly ..
Basic - Rs 1000
BED - 14% - Rs 1400 instead of Rs 140
where in item column, the exicse values are flowed correcly.
pls suggest, where is the mistake..

I am also facing the same problem any answers

In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

Hi,
We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
please suggest me the any config
Thanks
Shital

Hi,
i have test in SAP note u suggested
Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
but my scenario is different
Thanks
Shital

STO-MIGO-Incorect Excise Values

Dear Gurus,
we have created a STO Po( using ME21N) and created delivery(using VL10B) with 2 batches and a proforma invoice at the supplying plant and created an excise invoice.
In this case, we created one STO- with two batches (say 10 quantity in batch no 1 and 20 quantity in batch no 2) -one proforma(combining both the batches in one proforma invoice) and one excise invoice with refercencing the proforma in SD. While doing MIGO(goods receipt in MM), if we give delivery number and excise invoice number, automatically it is picking the last line item of excise invoice. All BED,ECESS,SCESS is calculating wrongly in MIGO.
We noted that, system is always picking the last batch quantityof the excise invoice and for each and every batch(each batch is represented as a seperate line item ) in MIGO.
   Here, in my case the system is calculating excise for 40 quantity instead of 30 quantity(combining batch 1 and 2).
Please throw some light on solving this issue.
regards,
ravikiran

hi Gurus,
   Thanks for giving me quick response.
       I will apply the said notes and revert back whether it is solving my problem or not.
regards,
ravikiran

Wrong excise value is calculated in billing doc. = VF01.

Dear All ,
I have created a billing doc for a STO , now my price of 1 ton is Rs 57328.94 & in billing the Con for exc is JEXP it is for,14 % but the exc cal culating as Rs 8329.61 , instead of Rs 8026.05 here the wrong calculated Rs 8329.61 is 14.529 % of Rs 57328.94 .so i m in VF03 now selected the cond type & clicked on detail icon here what i see that the a screen opens for header cond. details , here in cond details tab the amount coming as 14 % , Cond base value is Zero & Cond value is Rs 57328.94 , After this on the same scren i had clikced on Go to -
> cond record --> here also 14 % is given then how the system is calculating 14.529 % instead of 14 % .
Rgds
sap12

in the STO under cond tab at item level i had clicked on analysis tab then the con appearing are as under --->
Condition type     Message     Description
P101     213     Amount copied from material valuation data
FRB1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
FRC1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
FRA1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y017     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y018     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y019     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y020     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y015     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Total Cost     200     Subtotal
Here there is no JEXP , now as u wrote thjat to check the excise rate in J1ID -
> there is no excise rate made for this material , after this ---> in exceptional exc rate there are no entries., now pl guide that what to check .
Rgds
sap12

Excess / Wrong Excise Value Posting

Hi,
While doing the Excise Posting we posted Rs. 1050 in stead of 10.50.
Now we want to correct the Excess Amount posted. In our case reversal of Excise Invoice is not possible.
What is the way to correct the same?
Request you to please give the details of the Transaction along with FI entries.
Someone told me to correct the same using J1IH, I have explored the same, but confused which option to select.
Please advice
Regards,
PK

Hi Shubham,
Thanks for the reply.
I am doing the things in the following manner:
T Code: J1IH
Clicked Additional Excise button on Excise JV u2013 Main Menu
Document Number       5000000844
Document Year         2010
Company Code          1000
Plant                 1004
Excise Group          E4
Subtransaction Type = BLANK
Modvat Account Selection (RG23A)
Press Entered
The system is displaying the following message:
Document already exists for the reference 5000000844 2010
Pressed continued
Entered the following:
BED Amount = 100
ECS Amount = 2
SECess Amount =1
Clicked on Determine G/L Accounts
Here we get the following entries:
C     0013113920     103.00               CENVAT clearing
D     0024880020     1.00               PLA Sec n Higher Edu. Cess
D     0024820000     100.00               CENVAT Input BED
D     0024820010     2.00               CENVAT Input Edu. Cess
I have not selected any where related with PLA, still it is coming.
Please guide.
Regards,

Excise values error in migo

Dear Friends,
this is chandra shekar , here i had one problem in migo transaction excise values are capturing in wrong way for example the material price is 100 rs BED is 8 % that is 8 rs when doing goods receipt for this material in item level excise value i'm getting 8 rs but in header level excise value it showing 80 rs that means in header level i'm getting one decimal place extra i dont know why it is caluclating in wrong , this error i'm getting from past 4 days ,in excise registers also it is updating with 80 rs only please any one can help me in this.
regards
chandu

Hi Anjali,
Thanks for your reply , but i have checked validity period it is correct, this problem i,m facing from past 4 days only , is there anything needs to check in decimal places , because it showing correct in item level but i header level only it is showing with one decimal more .
regards
chandu

Excise values are not flowing in MIGO

Dear All,
I am facing a problem during MIGO.
THERE IS STOCK TRANSFER BETWEEN 2 PLANTS AND 2 PLANTS ARE UNDER DIFFERENT COMPANY CODES.
1 I have created a PO.
2.Delivery through VL10D
3.Picking-vl02n
4.Created Bill-VF01
5.Created Invoice and saved it
When I am doing MIGO the excise values are not following.in migo SCREEN.I I want to know do i need to post EXCISE INVOICE and how to do the same.
Pl let me know anything is missed out so that excise invoice is not flowing in MIGO screen.
Regards
Manash

Hi,
Have you miantained Tax code in STO ? if yes, then have you mainatained Settoff as 100% for that Tax Code in FV11 for which combination you are using
SETOFF Must Be Maintained:-
JMX1 --     IN: A/P BED setoff
JEX1 ---      Ecess Setoff Sta
HX1     IN: A/P SECess SOTot
If it is there please follow the Following steps for STO
1.     Create Purchase Order(STO) using ME21N
2.     Create Outbound Delivery using VL10B
3.     Create Billing Document using VF01
4.     Create Excise Invoice using J1IIN
5.                   GR with respect to Inbound delivery and in Excise Invoice give number of VF01.
Hope Help U !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Excise value not flowing in MIGO

Dear All,
While doing MIGO, the Excise value for BED, ECESS is not flowing but the values are flowing in Purchse order. But the SECESS alone is flowing in both PO and MIGO.
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Dhinakar

Hi raja,
h r u???
I have maintained all the settings, i thuink some note has to be applied. I will check it...
Thanks for ur Support
regards
Dhinakar

Wrong excise Base in Excise tab in Item details in MIGO for ImportPurchases

Hi All,
We are facing an issue with wrong excise base in transaction MIGO item datails in excise tab,
Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
Case:
In PO ,
             Value in USD     Ex Rate          Value In INR
Assesable value     101                            52.4659          5299.0559
IN Basic customs     10.1          52.4659          529.90559
Sub (*** Value + BCD     111.1          52.4659          5828.96149
IN CVD          11.11                            52.4659          582.896149
In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
But in MIGO in excise tab excise Base is 5,776.50--> which is wrong.
Please help in correcting the same in system.
All relevant configuration and default conditions are maintained in systm.
Regards,
Vijaykumar P

> Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
> In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
Hi, I think your system is showing correct,
Base at the time MIGO will not be Assassable value +BCD, It will only be Assassable value,
Your 1st point is right "Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty"
Assassable value consist of Material cost, Insurance, Freight, 1% Landing charge etc. Check with your Imports team & Excise team for the same.
Apart from that, if your concern is about values then just check the exchange rates & the Miro posting what you have did.

Excise Values in MIGO For MPN Materials

Hello,
While capturing the excise invoice for the MPN materials system is not picking the excise values. We are using the TAXINN procedure and i have maintianed the condition records for the Key combination country/Plant/Control Code/Taxcode (WE have created a condtion table for this key combination) and we also maintained the MPN materials in the J1ID also but it is not picking the values in the item tab. Taxes are caluclated in the Purchase order.
Note:
For the MPN Materials we have only three views maintained in the material master and it is not extended to any of the plant.
I have noticed that if use the other tax code which i maintained the condition records for Conidtion table 651 (key Combination of Country/Tax Code) the excise values are flowing in MIGO but if i use the tax code EA (Condition table 652 Key Combination: country/Plant/Control Code/Taxcode) we are not getting the excise values in MIGO
Please let me know if there is any configuration is missing.
Regards,
Kumar Rayudu
Edited by: Kumar Rayudu on Oct 1, 2009 2:10 PM
Edited by: Kumar Rayudu on Oct 1, 2009 5:19 PM

>
cnranjith wrote:
> Dear all
>
> When doing MIGO for Import PO excise tab is not appearing for the material
>
> I have maintained all the data in J1ID for the material and plant
>
> already we use to capture EI for the same material and plant but this time this is creating issues
>
> We have posted an inoice of planned delivery costs but no excise tab in MIGO
>
> What might be the reason
First you have to post the Customs MIRO in case of import purchase...then go for MIGO...you will find excise tab will follow....
Regards,
Indranil

Excise value changing in MIGO

Dear all,
We have created a PO, and in migo we just captured the excise. We went th j1iex and selected change category and changed the excise value and it got posted. But at the time of MIRO, only the changed excise BED is appearing in the cenvat clearing account but for ECS and SHECESS the old values only appearing. What might be the problem?
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
AR

Hello,
You first check in excise defaults are you using set off conditions e.g. JEX1 and JHX1 secondly in classify condition type (customzing)please check whats combination are you maintaining against the condition types of educess and sec high educess
Regards
Vivek

Note 951952 - Incorrect excise values if batch split in MIGO for import PO

Dear participants,
We have applied Note 951952 - Incorrect excise values if batch split in MIGO for import PO,
for following issue,
While doing import goods receipt for batch split quantity,
excise base value is calculating for entire amount not by splitted quantity.
We are unable to solve this issue.
We are using SAP ECC release 6.0 level 11 whether above mentioned note can be applied or else any other
new notes to apply solve this issue.
Advance thanks
Regards,
A.Jeyakanthan

Thanks for reply,will check note is applicable for current package level.
Actually we found excise base value is same for GR of batch split quantities for same material
with valuation type import duty free.

Excise Values not appearing in MIGO

Dear All,
We are using tax procedure TAXINN.
When I tried to create a GR doc with ref to a PO the excise values are not getting flown from my PO.
I tried both in MIGO as J1IEX, but the excise values are not getting flown.
Also please note that for the same PO we have done a GR during the month of Oct & at that time there was no problem & all the excise values was displayed in the GR doc.
Analysis done till now.
I have checked the Excise Default settings & I can see the JM0P codtn type maintained under the A/P BED condtn as well as the JE0P Ecess Condtn type maintained under the Ecess AP.
Also the values are there in the PO which was determined using the condtn records.
I have also checked the Excise group,plant, company code & Excise G/L determination settings in IMG & everything seems OK.
But still I am facing the Problem.
Is there anything which I have missed in the above analysis ?
Please suggest your val inputs to solve this issue.
Regards,

Hi SNB,
Thanks a lot for the reply.
As you suggested I havent maintained the condition records for the set off conditions such as JMX1, JEX1 etc..
When I maintained it the values got displayed.
Now I have One more query.
See earlier I have created PO's with out maintaining records for these set off conditions & at that time the values were displayed in MIGO.
So how the system worked at that time?
Also note that I havent maintained any of the set off conditions in the Excise defaults (Since these are just statistical condtn types) . Is it OK?
Also maintaining the set off condition with 100% is a must in TAXINN & Is it Possible to display the values in MIGO without maintaining the records for these condtn types?
Expecting your reply.
Regards,

CIN--MIGO--Wrong excise value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for