Cisco 1760-V Route Table & VoIP
I have connected a 1760-V to a T1 (CCS) which serves the connection to the PSTN, and configured the ethernet port which will facilitate communications to an IP PBX.
Assuming the IP address of the IP PBX and the IP address assigned to the router's ethernet interface are on the same subnet, and further assuuming that a dynamic protocol will not be configured/required on the router, what static route entry will be required, if any? I am assuming a default static route entry would have to be configured, suggesting that all IP traffic should be sent to the IP PBX.
Thanks,
Derek Fairley
I would tend to think this should work, if your 1760V is only dealing with PSTN traffic and not data traffic. With setting the default static route all traffic should be sent to your IP PBX as you mentioned.
Similar Messages
-
Cisco 1760 and E1 to VoIP Gateway
Hello!
Recently we've developed a test VoIP network combined out of a verry differently branched devices. It's working quite well, excluding one part.
The problem occures when trying to call from a CCME Cisco IP phone registered in a gatekeeper to a MultiTechs Multivoip E1/VoIP gateway (which is connected to our PBX). In MvOIPs logs - I can focus Cisco Phone trying to connect using the correct codec, matching gateway prefix - BUT LEAVING NO IP ADDRESS OR H.323 ID. Mabey some ideas???
Network is H.323 based.
Thanks in advance.
MichaelHi Micheal,
Can your PBX see the digits being passed to it?
Thanks,
Erik -
Hello NetProf!
I'm repeating my request for help, mabey clearing a few things out.
1. We have a cisco 1760 router running CCME
2. Some connected to it cisco 79xx ip-phones
3. A third party gatekeeper - MikroTik router
4. Every device is logged in the gatekeeper, and every call i settled with the use of it.
5. We have a third party VoIP gateway - MultiTechs MultiVoIP - also registered in the gatekeeper.
6. Now the connections history:
a) when phoning from the gateway to cisco - everything works fine.
b) when phoning fromn cisco to the gateway - the connection failes - it looks like CISCO ISN'T FORWARDING ANY INDENTITY DATA - NO IP ADDRESS, AND H323-ID - GETS TO THE GATEWAY!!!!!
Please help!!
Michal PodoskiCheck if there are some known issues documented here:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122relnt/1700/rn1700yj.htm -
Cisco 1760 router will not recognize wic1-dsu-t1-v2 card in slots 3 or 4
My 1760 router will not recognize a wic1-dsu-t1-v2 card in slots 3 or 4. They only work in slots 1 & 2. Never saw this before where the same card would not work in different slots.
Need assistance.
Thanks,
Ron
Router#show version
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-IPBASE-M), Version 12.3(6c), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 20-Jul-04 07:00 by kellythw
Image text-base: 0x80008120, data-base: 0x80C74650
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Router uptime is 20 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System image file is "flash:c1700-ipbase-mz.123-6c.bin"
cisco 1760 (MPC860P) processor (revision 0x500) with 55598K/9938K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOC0849230K (3846615071), with hardware revision 0000
MPC860P processor: part number 5, mask 2
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
2 Serial network interface(s)
WIC T1-DSU
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
32768K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
Configuration register is 0x2102
Router#show flash
System flash directory:
File Length Name/status
1 7517112 c1700-ipbase-mz.123-6c.bin
[7517176 bytes used, 25775112 available, 33292288 total]
32768K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
Router#show diag
Slot 0:
C1760 1FE VE 4SLOT DV Mainboard Port adapter, 3 ports
Port adapter is analyzed
Port adapter insertion time unknown
EEPROM contents at hardware discovery:
Hardware Revision : 5.0
PCB Serial Number : FOC0849230K
Part Number : 73-7167-05
Board Revision : B0
Fab Version : 04
Product (FRU) Number : CISCO1760
EEPROM format version 4
EEPROM contents (hex):
0x00: 04 FF 40 03 16 41 05 00 C1 8B 46 4F 43 30 38 34
0x10: 39 32 33 30 4B 82 49 1B FF 05 42 42 30 02 04 FF
0x20: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x30: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x40: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x50: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
WIC/VIC Slot 0:
FT1 4351
Daughter card-Version 4 TLV Cookie Format
Hardware Revision : 1.1
PCB Serial Number : FOC09053XP1
Part Number : 73-8346-04
Board Revision : A0
RMA Test History : 00
RMA Number : 0-0-0-0
RMA History : 00
Deviation Number : 0-0
Product (FRU) Number : WIC-1DSU-T1-V2
Top Assy. Part Number : 800-22193-02
CLEI Code : IP4I380GAB
WIC/VIC Slot 1:
FT1 4351
Daughter card-Version 4 TLV Cookie Format
Hardware Revision : 1.2
PCB Serial Number : FOC10073JND
Part Number : 73-8346-05
Board Revision : A0
RMA Test History : 00
RMA Number : 0-0-0-0
RMA History : 00
Deviation Number : 0-0
Product (FRU) Number : WIC-1DSU-T1-V2
Top Assy. Part Number : 800-22193-03
CLEI Code : IPUIAPRRAAHi Ron,
Slots 3 & 4 are for VICs only.
Have a look at the Location/ Function table here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps221/products_tech_note09186a00800c3399.shtml
cheers,
Seb. -
Cisco 1760 router stays in rommon modus
I am having problems with a cisco 1760 router. When I turn the router on I am getting stuck in rommon mode. When I enter the command: "boot flash:c1700-sv8y7-mz.123-11.T3.bin" , the router will boot the ios image. But when i turn the router off and on, it will return to rommon mode. I have tried the following commands in rommon mode:
rommon 1 > confreg 0x2102
rommon 2 > reset
or
rommon 1 > confreg 0x142
rommon 2 > reset
without results. I get the following errors:
System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Bad checksum on cookie structure, resorting to backup copy
Correcting primary cookie from backup
C1700 platform with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
loadprog: bad file magic number: 0x0
open: failed to find and/or load the bootloader: "flash:music-on-hold.au"
loadprog: error - on file open
boot: cannot load "c1700-sv8y7-mz.123-11.T3.bin"
System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
C1700 platform with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
loadprog: bad file magic number: 0x0
boot: cannot load "flash:"
System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
C1700 platform with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
loadprog: bad file magic number: 0x0
boot: cannot load "flash:"
System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
C1700 platform with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
rommon 1 >
rommon 1 >
Thanks,
PieterI would recommend posting in the netpro forums about this.
http://www.cisco.com/go/netpro
This site is for the Cisco Small Business Pro routers.
For your problem though, you might try looking at your boot system command in your running config to make sure that it is accurate. -
Cisco 1760 my default GW. Optimizing external interface.
Hello, my current setup is....
[comcast 10 Mbps]<----->[Cisco 1760]<------->[Dell PowerConnect 3024]--------[LAN]
I have a WIC-1ENET on my 1760 connected to the the motorola cable modem. I was wondering if there are any specific commands I should apply to an external interface to improve performance, or keep unwanted traffic from being sent out.
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address dhcp
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat outside
no ip route-cache cef
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
half-duplex
priority-group 1
no cdp enable
That is my current setup for my external interface. I have the priority set for my xbox 360. So that netflix gets highest priority. This allows for me to get HD streams 90% of the time, with little to no slow downs from others using the network. I would like to set full-duplex, but doing so brings the connections to the internet down to a crawl. I don't know if this is because the cable modem needs to be reset after full-duplex has been set, or what.
I have seen some configurations with a hold-queue value. Would this help me any? Speed tests using dlsreports i see about 8Mbps/1.5Mbps down/up. I have modified the nat tcp timeout to 10 minutes.
Thanks for any information guys./* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Regarding the duplex settings on Ethernet 0/0 there are some rules in the standards. If you set the duplex manually on the interface auto negotiation is turned off and requested duplex will not be ‘announced’ to your cable modem. The default behavior according to the standard is for the cable modem to use half duplex. This will also happen if you set Ethernet 0/0 to full duplex since auto negotiation is turned off.
So in order to get full duplex you have two options:
1) Use the command ‘duplex auto’ on Ethernet 0/0
2) Configure both Ethernet 0/0 and your cable modem to full duplex.
André -
VRF Best Practice: LAN only VRF, Mgmt VRF, Global Routing table or VRF?
I am setting up a routed LAN (not a WAN) environment on two 6500 switches (sup-720). My goal is to create 32 routed environments separated by logical firewalls (multi-context ASA's). So I want a âcoreâ router in each environment, and don't want to buy 32 pairs of 6500's-sorry Cisco.
Each of these environments are tied together by a core routing environment, running on the same pair of 6500's. No WAN MPLS is going on and I am trying to use VRF for each of the routed environments core router. The management functions of the 6500 shall run off the VRF Core router and ip range (the one that ties all the other VRF's together. Here is a simple diagram:
VRF1
||
FW1
||
VRFCOR
||
FW2
||
VRF2
So to go from VRF1 to VRF2, you traverse two firewalls and VRFCOR.
Several questions related to this design:
1) Am I nuts to use VRF's in this application?
2) Is there a better choice than VRF's to do what I want?
3) Should VRFCOR be the global routing table (IOW, not a VRF)? Or should be its own VRF? Another way to ask this is: Shall a router ever run entirely in VRF tables, or should there be at least one global table in use?
4) Are there problems with any management protocols on a VRF, such as NTP, AAA, SNMP, LOGGING, TELNET? Or have all those been worked out?
5) Any other suggestions?
TIA, WillVRF is suited for such kind of an application. Refer to URL http://cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns171/c649/ccmigration_09186a0080851cc6.pdf to get an idea about the
-
Database tool for routing table history changes
Dear Community, I'm looking for a freeware tool to hold history changes in routing tables for small to medium network running BGP, OSPF and MPLS VPN routing tables via VRFs. This tool need a way to compare the database in order to know if these are the same during the time.
Is there a way to do this in Cisco Works?
Thanks in advances for your recommendations.Julius,
There are no industry recommended open source DB tools.
Normally it depends upon the developer preferences that how he/she wants to see the tool usability.
I can suggest you to go through the below link:
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=SQL+Tools
You can find many open source SQL tools, which you have to test and select one among them.
I can suggest you to use:
1) TOra
2) Easy SQL
3) SQuirrel
"Choose a Tool which is easy to use and efficient, Dont worry about Look n Feel"
Best of Luck -
Trouble getting internet route table distributet in a VRF
Hi every one ..
I'm have some trouble getting distributed the internet routing table between PE routers ...
CE1 og PE1 works fine, BGP routes all internet routes are shown i en route table, but distributing between PE1 and PE2 is now working .. any one having a clue !!.
My gold is to move internet access into it's oven VRF, and away from the global routing table
In the MPLS core aim running the same AS number as our official AS, that we use for peering to the internet..
snap of configurations
***CE1***
router bgp 65534
neighbor 172.31.61.55 remote-as 65534
neighbor 172.31.61.55 description PE-1
neighbor 172.31.61.55 shutdown
neighbor 172.31.61.55 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 172.31.61.55 next-hop-self
***MPLS PE1***
ip vrf NET-INTERNET
rd 65534:10051
route-target export 65534:10051
route-target import 65534:10051
interface Port-channel1.35
encapsulation dot1Q 35
ip vrf forwarding NET-INTERNET
ip address 172.31.61.55 255.255.255.224
mpls label protocol ldp
tag-switching mtu 1546
tag-switching ip
router bgp 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.146 remote-as 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.146 description PE2
neighbor 192.168.0.146 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 192.168.0.146 version 4
neighbor 192.168.0.146 next-hop-self
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 192.168.0.146 activate
neighbor 192.168.0.146 send-community both
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf NET-INTERNET
neighbor 172.31.1.2 remote-as 65534
neighbor 172.31.1.2 activate
neighbor 172.31.1.2 description CE1
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
***MPLS PE2***
ip vrf NET-INTERNET
rd 65534:10051
route-target export 65534:10051
route-target import 65534:10051
interface Port-channel1.67
encapsulation dot1Q 67
ip vrf forwarding NET-INTERNET
ip address 172.31.254.1 255.255.255.252
mpls label protocol ldp
tag-switching mtu 1546
tag-switching ip
router bgp 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.132 remote-as 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.132 description PE1
neighbor 192.168.0.132 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 192.168.0.132 version 4
address-family ipv4 vrf NET-INTERNET
neighbor 172.31.254.2 remote-as 65534
neighbor 172.31.254.2 activate
Best regards
/PeterFor VPN routes to be exchanged between the two PEs, you first need to configure VPNv4 address family on each one of the PEs.
Carrying the full Internet routing table over VPNv4 will work but it is not very scalable since all PE routers have to hold the full Internet routing table in the VRF context in addition to potentially full Internet routing table in the global routing table. If you want to exchange full Internet routing table between the two CEs, it would be preferable to use something Carrier Supporting Carrier (CSC).
Please refer to the following URL for additional information on CSC:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120s/120s23/fscscl23.htm
Hope this helps, -
Vrf routes into global route table
Dear All
I am stuck with a design I am trying to come up with for our EDGE network and looking for ideas from the community.
It is similar to what is described here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Network_Virtualization/ServEdge.html#wp86450http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Network_Virtualization/ServEdge.html#wp86904
In short we have a multi-context FWSM at 2 sites creating an EDGE network, each site operate independently. The sites are linked internally in a single routing domain using OSPF. Each of the outside networks are in seperate VRFs, single-tier model.
I need to find a way to:
1) link the 2 sites (currently is done with a GRE tunnel between the site vrfs, looking at replacing this with mp-bgp and l3vpn encapsulation)
2) redistribute routes from each of the vrf into the common global route table (running ospf)
1 is working nicely with mp-BGP peer between the sites and routes distributed between, however I am stuck on how to achieve 2.
The only way I can see is to change the global route table to a vrf, then use rt import/export. This is commonly described as shared services. When I did that I got stuck with how to do the BGP peering as the loopback I was using for the peering is inside the new vrf.
Basically I want dynamic routing from the global route table to learn routes from each of the sites vrf. Then if a particular site's vrf is unavailable, it can pick up the other site's route.
Am I missing something here? The document linked makes it sound incredibly easy yet I am struggling with how to implement it.
Any advice is much appreciatedHello philip,
It is really hard to help you, if you do not provide topology where you would like to implement these changes, so just some thoughts to your points:
2) redistribute routes from each of the vrf into the common global route table (running ospf)
You can use PE - CE design. VRFs are terminated on PE with all routes you need in respective VRFs. On PE, MP-BGP routes are redistributed into respective VRF's OSPF process . PE is connected with CE via separate physical interface for each VRF or you can use one physical interface with dedicated sub-interface for each VRF. PE is peering with CE using OSPF. All routes end up in CE global routing table.
Problems with this design ->
- for each VRF you have to create separate OSPF process on PE and CE, also OSPF process ID has to be unique on PE for each VRF. Also OSPF process ID has to match to establish OSPF neighborship between PE-CE, so on CE you will have to redistribute OSPF routes from each process to your main OSPF process.
other workarounds ->
1) instead OSPF you will use as peering protocol BGP between PE-CE, but you still have to redistribute BGP routes to OSPF on CE
2) you will use different PE to redistribute each VRF -> BGP routes will be redistributed from VRF into OSPF (same process ID as your main OSPF ID). Routes will be advertised via OSPF into CE global routing table.
You will use on PE per VRF to redistribute routes into OSPF with same process ID as your main process ID. Thanks to different PEs, you can have same OSPF process ID, all these PEs will peer with same CE via OSPF.
I hope I made my thoughts understandable, cause its quite hard to explain
When I did that I got stuck with how to do the BGP peering as the loopback I was using for the peering is inside the new vrf.
This should not be a problem. You can have same IP on all VRF and also global table, so peering can still be done. After BGP routes are exchanged you can leak prefixes from one vrf to another or into global table as you need.
Best Regards
Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions -
3845 router failing to look up routes from routing table correctly!
Hi all,
Got a really strange issue which I am wondering if someone can point me in the right direction for. Facts of the issue:
- Some customers, all with a specific ISP, cannot access a hosted service we host internally
- External user can reach service but never gets a response - hence focussing on reachability of their public IP
- Cisco 3845 router used, peers with service provider over BGP - receives full internet routing tables
- All affected customers receive dynamic IP addresses within the same /10 public IP range
I received an example IP address and when doing "show ip route x.x.x.x" for this IP, the router responds "Subnet not in table". When trying to traceroute to the IP, the router doesnt even go to the next hop. However, the subnet is definitely in the routing table with the correct next hop (and, for complete information, is also within the BGP updates). Before anyone asks the question :) - yes I have definitely verified that the hosts are within this subnet.
If I put a static /32 route in for this specific IP address, everything works fine - then fails again once its taken out.
I literally cannot understand why the router is not correctly performing the lookup for the hosts within this subnet. I can understand a lot of potential reasons why the BGP received route wouldnt be placed in the routing table, but that is not the case here.
Some other factors (if applicable):
- Nothing showing in the logs
- Plenty memory available (despite the high number of routes)
- Plenty CPU resource available
- No default route is ran
I am going to restart the router and really expect this to resolve the issue (would log a TAC but this one is a bit time precious) - but it is frankly doing my head in and I assume I am missing something!
Any help or guidance would be appreciated!Hi all,
Got a really strange issue which I am wondering if someone can point me in the right direction for. Facts of the issue:
- Some customers, all with a specific ISP, cannot access a hosted service we host internally
- External user can reach service but never gets a response - hence focussing on reachability of their public IP
- Cisco 3845 router used, peers with service provider over BGP - receives full internet routing tables
- All affected customers receive dynamic IP addresses within the same /10 public IP range
I received an example IP address and when doing "show ip route x.x.x.x" for this IP, the router responds "Subnet not in table". When trying to traceroute to the IP, the router doesnt even go to the next hop. However, the subnet is definitely in the routing table with the correct next hop (and, for complete information, is also within the BGP updates). Before anyone asks the question :) - yes I have definitely verified that the hosts are within this subnet.
If I put a static /32 route in for this specific IP address, everything works fine - then fails again once its taken out.
I literally cannot understand why the router is not correctly performing the lookup for the hosts within this subnet. I can understand a lot of potential reasons why the BGP received route wouldnt be placed in the routing table, but that is not the case here.
Some other factors (if applicable):
- Nothing showing in the logs
- Plenty memory available (despite the high number of routes)
- Plenty CPU resource available
- No default route is ran
I am going to restart the router and really expect this to resolve the issue (would log a TAC but this one is a bit time precious) - but it is frankly doing my head in and I assume I am missing something!
Any help or guidance would be appreciated! -
I have a cisco 1760 router with one adsl wic and one shdsl wic (wic 1 shdsl v3).The router has detected the adsl wic but not the shdsl.I am using the following software:c1700-y7-mz.123-4.XG5.bin.I have tried several ios and used feature navigator to find ios but neither works.Here is output of sh version
Can somedy help ?Already replied in WAN forum, please do not open duplicate threads.
-
I have a Linksys RT31P2 wired VoIP router that connects to my cable modem directly. Since there are more than 3 computers that link up to the internet in my house I have connected a Netgear FS105 5 port switch which all of the computers on my network connect to. I have had this setup for about 4 years now and it has been working fine until recently. I noticed that my connection was slowing down and wierd things were happening like links popping back to the page the link was on instead of the link itself and super long periods between page refreshes. So out of the blue I log into the router admin space and have a look around, nothing unusual. I open the routing table and I was surprised to see all of these strange Ip's, complete with their own subnet masks and default gateways. Also, all of them had a hop count of 165. The ip addresses resolved to several different ISP's in the sout eastern part of the country. Turning the router off and then back on clears all of these out but within a few days they are back. I have checked all of the computers in the network but have found nothing out of the ordinary. What is going on here? I didn't think that an attacker could come through the router firewall on a wired router but if hackers can get into top government networks, I guess they could get through a simple router. The following link is to a pic of the routing table with all of the strange entries. Anybody ever experience this and if so, what was done to prevent it from happening? Thanks.
Message Edited by LH1966 on 07-29-2008 09:07 PMI'm not sure I follow exactly. Are you saying a firewall between the router and modem? Doesn't the router already have one in place and is there such a thing as a firewall box that goes between devices like that? Somebody told me that this might have been due to p2p sites like Limewire or Bearshare, neither of which my wife nor myself use. My daughter has used Limeware but not much from what she says. I don't know but I really would like to fix this for good.
-
Troubleshooting with IOS BGP and IOS XR BGP - routing table Empty
Hi
actually we tried to make a neigborhood between ASR9000 and Cisco 7600, we have the neigborhood active but on routing tables from ASR only have the networks locals or connected doesn´t learn anything from BGP 7600
the diagram is this:
When try to know the routes on ASR9000 from Cisco 7609 happen the follow
the neighbor is UP from Cisco 7600 and ASR 9000 but the routing table is empty.
the config on cisco 7600 is:
router bgp 2006
neighbor 172.16.14.6 remote-as 64512
address-family ipv4
neighbor 172.16.14.6 activate
the config on cisco ASR9000 is:
router bgp 64512
bgp router-id 172.16.161.1
address-family ipv4 unicast
neighbor 172.16.14.5
remote-as 2006
address-family ipv4 unicast
Help us
Best RegardsAnother important one is the fact that in XR you need to have RPL policies (even if they only have a "pass-all" functionality) to accept inbound/outbound routes in eBGP.
Check the article on the asr9000 unequal cost multipath that has some sample BGP outputs and show command verifications that may help also.
If not the case, get us the XR config from the A9K side.
Also what does the bgp table on teh IOS side look like? as Richard suggests, there doesnt seem to be anything injected by the 7600 itself.
regards
xander
Xander Thuijs
Principal Engineer CCIE#6775, ASR9000 -
How Clean ip Route Table and configuration
How Clean ip Route Table and configuration?
Cisco have any best practice?Hey Juan,
your question is not very clear but i believe you want to know how to clean ip route table and configuration. So:
1. Cleaning IP routing table - clear ip route * - This will refersh the routing table.
2. Cleaning configuration - It depends on the device however in most of Cisco devices you may clear the startup configurtion and its done :)
HTH.
regards,
RS.
Maybe you are looking for
-
If I'm running Windows 7 and have Elements 3.0 incompatibility issues, is there a solution?
Elements 3.0 seems to function ok so far on Windows 7, but my backup to my Seagate (FreeAgent Go Classic) external drive fails due to errors caused by Elements 3.0. Is 3.0 so old that there is no available upgrade or solution? If so, can I upgrade to
-
Dear Experts, Consignment Process: Invoice is prepared as per price list i.e. 50% of MRP(not sale) and VAT @12.50%(on 50% MRP) on Invoice. (to create VAT liability in the state and by that only VAT GL should hit). After receving the stocks C&S Agent
-
hi expert: I got problem in printing in tcode v/82. I knew I can put my form name in it ,but which element should I put? If customer's require can't be found in program 'RV56TD00' form 'ENTRY', should I get an Object Key and do modification?
-
"No password" on resource in IDM 8
Dear all, i am just creating a resource to pull userdata from an oracle table ( actually view but doesn't matter here ) but i do not want to manage a password, therefore i disabled the password feature. But i still getting an error when trying to sav
-
Hello all, For the below XML, Here the tag <Case> arises 3 times. Is there any XML function type that can retrieve the number of time a particular case is present? <Notes > <FromPartnerID>12312/FromPartnerID> <ToPartnerID>1231234<ToPartnerID> <Operat