Cisco 2960S FPS-L PoE switch with Avaya 9811g VOIP setup

Hello,
I am connecting a setup for data/voice connecting Catalyst 2960S-FPS-L PoE switch with Avaya 9811g series VOIP phone. As per my knowledge cisco switch works well with Cisco phone as it has got some builtin "Macros" and Intelligent PoE recognition when we connect device getting the details of another device through CDP. I understand I have to create data and voice vlan with QOS then enable trunking on the interface to other switch that is also 2960. Little confuse if is there any compatibility issues with Switch and Avaya phone regarding protocol/data/voice...?
Do I have to do PoE config for each port on the each interface?
any help or detail config will help.
Thanks in advance.

Hi I am back after good research. created two vlan data and voice with trunk on interface1/0/48 given below config..
connection b/w 2960s FPS Switch and Avaya 9611g IP Phone.
lldp/cdp is enable on switch
So I created this config if some one can take a look .
expert advise if something wrong?..
I am only concern with Voice and PoE as voice is my priority. do i have to map something for voice quality?
also if i create another Trunk port one allow voice other allow data both cable will go to switch will that be issue?
interface....
switchport access vlan x
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
switchport voice vlan xx
srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
queue-set 2
priority-queue out
mls qos trust cos
auto qos voip trust
spanning-tree portfast
interface ........
switchport trunk allowed vlan x,x
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
queue-set 2
priority-queue out
mls qos trust cos
auto qos voip trust

Similar Messages

  • Cisco 3750x 24 port poe switch failure

    what is the chance of cisco 3750x 24 port poe switch failure? is backup necessary for this ? please answer me in details.

    If you have a Cisco switch with, at least, one faulty port you RMA the appliance.  
    There is nothing more detailed than that.

  • UPDATE: Deal of the Week - Cisco 3550 24 port PoE Switch

    Well that didn't last long...our "Deal of the Week" this week sold out in 1 day, so we figured we better do another deal for everyone. - - - Cisco 3550 24 Port PoE Switch - $65.00 --- www.cablesandkits.com/DOW

    How might you use PowerShell Direct, the latest addition to the PowerShell family that's coming with Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016? Consider this:Have you ever tried to make a configuration changeon a Friday afternoon, right before beer o’clock, and you couldn’t get access to the machine you needed to change? This problem might be caused by out-of-datesecurity settings, a network change, or something else.PowerShell Direct will work, even when otherwise things would stand in your way.According to Petri, the new software will change the way you operate "between hypervisorhost and guest virtual machine in a secure way." No more "faffing about to get security settings configured, holes poked in firewalls," or remoting in – PowerShell Direct gives you a direct way to open a session on any guest computer in seconds.
    If you have Windows...

  • Cisco 3750x 24 port poe switch single port is faulty.

    what i can do if my cisco 3750x 24 port poe switch single port is faulty ????

    Duplicate posts.  
    Go here:  http://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12187366/cisco-3750x-24-port-poe-switch-failure

  • Can cisco CAP2702i connect to Cisco3850 switch with wireless LAN controller license via another switch ?

    If i connect cisco AP - CAP2702i to another switch, and use trunk port between Cisco3850 and the other switch , can the AP able to register with Cisco3850 with wireless LAN controller  ?   or the AP has to directly connect to Cisco3850 in order to register?

    The AP and 3850 wireless management are in same Vlan( vlan202). The AP is new unit and did not join MC before. 
    What i did on 3850 :
    input command - wireless management interface vlan 202
                              - ap cdp
                              - wireless mobility controller
    Is there any config i miss out on 3850 and any config need to be set on AP ?
    From Ap console output show me "could not discover WLC using dhcp ip". Is it due to AP dont have IP address? If AP register with WLC through layer 2 , i believe there is no related with IP.Correct me if i'm wrong.
    Due to the 3850 is not a POE, the AP unable directly connect to 3850  . I guess have to use power adapter to power on the AP.

  • 2960-X stacking, 5 switches with interwoven 0.5 M cables

    I am trying to understand how to connect 5 switches using 0.5 M cables only.  I have read this "best practices" document, but it leaves some unanswered questions.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-2960-x-series-switches/white_paper_c11-728327.pdf
    I would normally just daisy chain the switches and bring a connection from the bottom switch back up to the top to create a "ring" topology.  But the documentation also states that switches can be connected with "interweaved cables".  It makes no statement as to what if any performance considerations should be taken into account when designing stack interconnections, or whether this interwoven topology creates any operational complications.  The only requirements that I have seen is that each switch must have 2 operational FlexStack links in order to be fully redundant and to fully utilize all available bandwidth.  Does anyone have any guidance in this area?
    Assuming no negative consequences by using the "interwoven" topology, does this make sense?
    Thanks,
    -Jeff

    Well it probably wouldn't be confusing if I could find a clear set of ground rules.  The documentation mentions "FlexStack protocol", but the discussions seem to indicate that this is a control plane protocol. Do the stacking modules operate as ethernet bridges when making forwarding decisions like any other switch port?  If the answer is yes then at least I understand the principal of operation.  But now if you throw multi-chassis etherchannel uplinks into the mix divining general layer 2 paths becomes a little murky.
    Although now that I look at it, using this cabling has an advantage over a straight ring topology.  Once a frame hits the stack it is never more than 2 hops away from it's destination.  With daisy-chained switches it could be up to 4 hops.  This is of course assuming standard 802.1d-like forwarding.  This may be an invalid assumption.  I don't see any way to get spanning tree info for the stack ports.
    (EDIT:  standard ring topology would also have a maximum of 2 hops to any switch, not 4)

  • Alteon Switch to Cisco 2960 port aggrigating

    LACP / 802.3ad is required to aggrigate a cisco to a non cisco switch, is there any issues connecting a Cisco 2960 to a Alteon Switch.

    There should be none as long as alteon support LaCP, 2960 certainly do. for configuration guide info, have a look at the following:
    http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat2960/12225see/scg/swethchl.htm
    Please rate all posts.

  • Powering AP's via POE switch or injector

    Hi,
    Could anyone please advise if there is any difference in the power supplied to a 1142N AP when using a power injector (AIR-PWRINJ3/AIR-PWRINJ4) compared to using poe on the switch port (2960S 24 port POE switch WS-C2960S-24PS-L).
    Thanks.

    but someone once advised that in order to get full N potential from the AP's you need injectors.
    Someone got their facts wrong.
    If I was to get the full potential with N, I'd look to plug the WAP into a GigabitEthernet port.  PoE or Injector won't make any difference.

  • Adding a PoE Switch to existing Network

    Hello,
    Currently we have a Linksys RV016 router with 3 Linksys SRW224G 24-Port Managed Switch. Can I add a PoE switch to my existing setup without any problems or I can only add none PoE switches?
    If I can add a PoE switch is there a specific configuration or just plug and play?
    Thanks,
    B

    Yes you can connect a PoE switch to the SRW224G switches but you will need to connect the PoE switch to a power supply. The only way that PoE (Power over Ethernet) will work is when you connect the PoE switch with another PoE switch. Only in this scenario, you won’t need to use a separate power supply for the PoE switch to work because it is getting its power form the first PoE switch / router.  
    Regarding if this will just be plug and play, it won’t be plug and play. If you have set up VLANs or other crucial settings in the other switches and you want it to manually set the PoE switch depending on the limitations you want for these PoE switches.

  • Can I Stack Switches with differents Part Numbers? Is it possible??

    Hi,
    I have a doubt, I need to buy 4 Switches Cisco 3750-X, but 2 with UTP/RJ-45 Ports, and 2 with STP capability.
    My question is, for example, Can I stack 2 WS-C3750X-48T-E and 2 WS-C3750X-24S-E??

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    The only limitation of stacking different 3750X models is the feature set of the installed IOS.
    I.e.:  "The Cisco Catalyst 3750-X Series Switches with LAN Base feature set can only stack with other Cisco Catalyst 3750‑X Series LAN Base switches. A mixed stack of LAN Base switch with IP Base or IP Services features set is not supported."

  • Power up cisco 2960 switch with 12V DC Power

    hi all ,
    I have some issue with supply power to cisco 2960-24TT-L switch. In my server farm rack is having DC current of -48V. But however cisco switch require 12V DC current.
    Cisco Spec.
    Cisco Catalyst 2960-24TT-L
    12V at 5 A
    5 A
    How can I power on the switch using DC current ?  Is there any power converter which I can purchase ? your responses are very much.
    Thanks

    You may also go here: 
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business
    The Search Function is your friend.... and Google too.
    How to Secure your Network
    How to Upgrade Routers Firmware
    Setting-Up a Router with DSL Internet Service
    Setting-Up a Router with Cable Internet Service
    How to Hard Reset or 30/30/30 your Router

  • Using Cisco 7961 Phones with Linksys SRW208P POE Switch

    I am having a problem getting our Cisco 7961 phones to work with a Linksys SRW208P POE switch. The internet works great , but when I connect a 7961 Cisco phone it hangs at the " configuring IP " screen. Are these model phones compatible with this switch? Any Ideas. Thank You!

    I'm having a similar problem with the Cisco 7941G phones using a Linksys SLM224G4PS (with PoE). Did you ever get them to work?
    The 7941Gs work with the plain Linksys SR224 and using power injectors, but not with the smart switch. It has nothing to do with the PoE, I've used the power injectors with the SLM224G4PS. It wasn't a current overload problem.
    I've gotten the phones to work for somewhere between 10-40 seconds, which has given me enough time to find the IP address (DHCP) then pull up the web interface of the Cisco 7941G.
    The phone on the SR244 had GARP enabled and Voice VLAN enabled and the operation, the phone on the SLM224G4PS had both disabled.
    The working phone on the SR244 had a operational VLAN ID of 31, the non working phone on the SLM224G4PS didn't have any indicated.
    I'm guessing that the root of the problem is the Voice VLAN, but tech support tells me that out of the box the switch should pass everything.
    Apparently not so much...

  • Cisco 1252s with regular 802.3af PoE switches - what are the impacts?

    Does anyone have any real-life experience with deploying the 1252s on regular 802.3af PoE switches?  I have a few 1252s one some 3560 PoE ports and the show up with "low power" alarms.
    I am wondering what the real world impact is with this scenario.  The 1252s have both 2.4 Ghz and 5.0 Ghz radios in them and I have HT enabled on the controller.
    I'm wondering what capabilities I am losing by running on 802.3af power besides the annoyance of the alarms.
    Thanks in advance!

    Sorry in advance for the book I have just written.
    I have three 1252s on 75 feet of Cat5e cable running to a 3560 PoE switch. Sometimes, but not always, I see a low power alarm on the access point(s). This is in a small building that is built like a fortress so the RF environment is somewhat challenging. I am watching WCS closely and see all three 2.4 GHz radios powered all the way up to power level 1. I notice that two of the 5GHz radios are on power level 1, and one is on level 3. I thought that RRM would not power anything down until you had at least four access points as RF neighbors. I believe I read that in a Ciscopress book and it seems to be true everywhere in our network when I look at buildings with 3 or less WAPs.
    The building in question does not have any other buildings close by with any 5GHz radios in operation - or at least I didn't see any when I did the survey.
    I'm wondering if the power setting of the radios is also related to the length of the Cat5e cabling. Seems to me a shorter run would have less resistance than longer runs, allowing the radio to have more power.
    My main concern is not this building in question, since we went for coverage and not client density in the design. We several other buildings on the radar, all libraries, which are going to be both RF challenging (bookshelves, furniture, cubicles, cubbies) and client-density challenged. These buildings have hundreds of WLAN clients in them at times - and I mean devices, not just people.
    Someone else told me (reputable source) that channel bonding is not an option when on 802.3af power. Makes sense, actually. I would never even think of bonding in the 2.4 GHz range for obvious reasons, but up in the 5GHz range it is a definate possibility in these buildings. Seems to be that we might be shooting ourselves in the foot by not using 802.3at power in these buildings.
    If channel bonding is disabled and the upper two MCS rates (using 800ns guard interval) of 117 and 130 are disabled, then I'm looking at maximum MCS rate of 104 Mbit/s compared to 270 Mbit/s with 802.3at with channels bonded in the 5GHz range.

  • SNMPv3 on Cisco 2960-S Switch to NCS

    Can anyone point me to some good instructions on how to set up SNMPv3 on a Cisco Catalyst 2960-S switch in order to manage it with Cisco Prime NCS?

    here is link which explains snmp config for 2960s
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_55_se/configuration/guide/swsnmp.html#wp1076836

  • IEEE 802.1x with EAP-TLS issue in cisco 2960

    In My Cisco 2960 switch is not working with EAP-TLS mechanism of 802.1x but its works well with other  protocols like EAP-PEAP or MAC Address authentication.
    Below is the configuration
    aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ local
    aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+ enable
    aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
    aaa authorization commands 15 default group tacacs+ local
    aaa authorization network default group radius
    aaa authorization configuration default group radius
    aaa accounting update periodic 30
    aaa accounting dot1x default start-stop group radius
    aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+
    aaa accounting commands 0 default start-stop group tacacs+
    aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group tacacs+
    aaa accounting network default start-stop group tacacs+
    aaa accounting connection default start-stop group tacacs+
    aaa accounting system default start-stop group tacacs+
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    switchport access vlan 11
    switchport mode access
    speed 100
    duplex full
    authentication order dot1x mab webauth
    authentication port-control auto
    mab
    dot1x pae authenticator
    dot1x timeout tx-period 3
    dot1x timeout supp-timeout 3
    spanning-tree portfast
    spanning-tree bpduguard enable
    Can anyone suggest me ?

    Thanks for the reply jatin.
    I have a client on the interface fa0/1 with a valid client certificate. And have a debug logs as below
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Interface state changed to UP
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: AAA/BIND(000001C7): Bind i/f 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: initial state auth_initialize has enter
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_initialize_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_initialize, got event 0(cfg_auto)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_initialize -> auth_disconnected
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_disconnected_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: idle during state auth_disconnected
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_disconnected -> auth_restart
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_restart_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending create new context event to EAP for 0xB0000DBA (0000.0000.0000)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: initial state auth_bend_initialize has enter
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_initialize_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: initial state auth_bend_initialize has idle
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_initialize, got event 16383(idle)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_initialize -> auth_bend_idle
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_idle_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Created a client entry (0xB0000DBA)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Dot1x authentication started for 0xB0000DBA (0000.0000.0000)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-ev:DOT1X Supplicant not enabled on FastEthernet0/1
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting !EAP_RESTART on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_restart, got event 6(no_eapRestart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_restart -> auth_connecting
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.266: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_connecting_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_restart_connecting_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting RX_REQ on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_connecting, got event 10(eapReq_no_reAuthMax)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_connecting -> auth_authenticating
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_authenticating_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_connecting_authenticating_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting AUTH_START for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_idle, got event 4(eapReq_authStart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_idle -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0xB0000DBA (0000.0000.0000)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.274: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_idle_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): queuing an EAPOL pkt on Auth Q
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev:Enqueued the eapol packet to the global authenticator queue
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x1  length: 0x0000
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev:
    dot1x_auth_queue_event: Int Fa0/1 CODE= 0,TYPE= 0,LEN= 0
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAPOL frame
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Received pkt saddr =d43d.7e65.4fc1 , daddr = 0180.c200.0003,
        pae-ether-type = 888e.0101.0000
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Couldn't find the supplicant in the list
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): New client detected, notifying AuthMgr
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending event (0) to Auth Mgr for d43d.7e65.4fc1
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAPOL-Start packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x1  length: 0x0000
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAPOL_START on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_authenticating, got event 4(eapolStart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_authenticating -> auth_aborting
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_authenticating_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_aborting_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): 802.1x method gets the go ahead from Auth Mgr for 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EE240F5BAB
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting AUTH_ABORT for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_request, got event 1(authAbort)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_request -> auth_bend_initialize
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_initialize_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: idle during state auth_bend_initialize
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_initialize -> auth_bend_idle
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_idle_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting !AUTH_ABORT on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_aborting, got event 20(no_eapolLogoff_no_authAbort)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_aborting -> auth_restart
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_aborting_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_restart_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Resetting the client 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.794: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending create new context event to EAP for 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.802: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_aborting_restart_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.802: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting !EAP_RESTART on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.802:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_restart, got event 6(no_eapRestart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.802: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_restart -> auth_connecting
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.802: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_connecting_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.802: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_restart_connecting_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting RX_REQ on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_connecting, got event 10(eapReq_no_reAuthMax)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_connecting -> auth_authenticating
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_authenticating_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_connecting_authenticating_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting AUTH_START for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_idle, got event 4(eapReq_authStart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_idle -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_idle_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Queuing an EAPOL pkt on Authenticator Q
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev:Enqueued the eapol packet to the global authenticator queue
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x0  length: 0x0022
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev:
    dot1x_auth_queue_event: Int Fa0/1 CODE= 2,TYPE= 1,LEN= 34
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAPOL frame
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Received pkt saddr =d43d.7e65.4fc1 , daddr = 0180.c200.0003,
        pae-ether-type = 888e.0100.0022
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAP packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x0  length: 0x0022
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAP packet from d43d.7e65.4fc1
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAPOL_EAP for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_request, got event 6(eapolEap)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_request -> auth_bend_response
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): dot1x_sendRespToServer: Response sent to the server from 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_response_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.811: AAA/AUTHEN/8021X (000001C7): Pick method list 'default'
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS/ENCODE(000001C7):Orig. component type = DOT1X
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS(000001C7): Config NAS IP: 0.0.0.0
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS/ENCODE(000001C7): acct_session_id: 724
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS(000001C7): sending
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS/ENCODE: Best Local IP-Address 10.26.237.11 for Radius-Server 10.26.13.59
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS(000001C7): Send Access-Request to 10.26.13.59:1812 id 1645/83, len 251
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  authenticator A1 79 FA E5 F4 B7 7F 4F - 2B 73 3A 0D 1F D8 89 20
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  User-Name           [1]   31  "host/D0902MALL005.IN.intranet"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  Service-Type        [6]   6   Framed                    [2]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  Framed-MTU          [12]  6   1500                     
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  Called-Station-Id   [30]  19  "D4-A0-2A-EE-14-81"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  Calling-Station-Id  [31]  19  "D4-3D-7E-65-4F-C1"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  36 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:   02 01 00 22 01 68 6F 73 74 2F 44 30 39 30 32 4D 41 4C 4C 30  ["host/D0902MALL0]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:   30 35 2E 49 4E 2E 69 6E 74 72 61 6E 65 74    [ 05.IN.intranet]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:   D6 6F 7B CD 36 46 5E F6 90 6F 85 A8 BD BD AE D8            [ o{6F^o]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  EAP-Key-Name        [102] 2   *
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  49 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43  "audit-session-id=0A1AED0B000000EE240F5BAB"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Type       [61]  6   Ethernet                  [15]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  NAS-Port            [5]   6   50001                    
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Id         [87]  17  "FastEthernet0/1"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   10.26.237.11             
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS:  Acct-Session-Id     [44]  10  "000002D4"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.819: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.861: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/1, changed state to up
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/83 10.26.13.59:1812, Access-Challenge, len 76
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS:  authenticator 7B 1C DC CA A8 92 E9 34 - 17 86 25 2F 9D 7E 63 96
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  8  
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS:   01 02 00 06 0D 20                 [  ]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS:   DD F3 7B 33 37 6D 40 BD F3 D2 78 DF F1 14 4D E4           [ {37m@xM]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS:  State               [24]  30 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.903: RADIUS:   00 7D 00 9B 00 C1 00 40 ED B8 45 00 FC DD 50 2E DC 0E E6 03 FC 7B AD 4C B7 E7 B1 70          [ }@EP.{Lp]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: RADIUS(000001C7): Received from id 1645/83
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: RADIUS/DECODE: EAP-Message fragments, 6, total 6 bytes
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAP_REQ for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_response, got event 7(eapReq)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_response -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0006
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x2  length: 0x0006 type: 0xD
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.911: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Queuing an EAPOL pkt on Authenticator Q
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-ev:Enqueued the eapol packet to the global authenticator queue
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x0  length: 0x0069
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-ev:
    dot1x_auth_queue_event: Int Fa0/1 CODE= 2,TYPE= 13,LEN= 105
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAPOL frame
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Received pkt saddr =d43d.7e65.4fc1 , daddr = 0180.c200.0003,
        pae-ether-type = 888e.0100.0069
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAP packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x0  length: 0x0069
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAP packet from d43d.7e65.4fc1
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAPOL_EAP for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_request, got event 6(eapolEap)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_request -> auth_bend_response
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): dot1x_sendRespToServer: Response sent to the server from 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_response_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: AAA/AUTHEN/8021X (000001C7): Pick method list 'default'
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: RADIUS/ENCODE(000001C7):Orig. component type = DOT1X
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: RADIUS(000001C7): Config NAS IP: 0.0.0.0
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: RADIUS/ENCODE(000001C7): acct_session_id: 724
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: RADIUS(000001C7): sending
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: RADIUS/ENCODE: Best Local IP-Address 10.26.237.11 for Radius-Server 10.26.13.59
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: RADIUS(000001C7): Send Access-Request to 10.26.13.59:1812 id 1645/84, len 352
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.920: RADIUS:  authenticator 41 72 8D 6A B4 72 19 84 - 1B C8 33 F7 95 DD 07 BC
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  User-Name           [1]   31  "host/D0902MALL005.IN.intranet"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  Service-Type        [6]   6   Framed                    [2]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  Framed-MTU          [12]  6   1500                     
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  Called-Station-Id   [30]  19  "D4-A0-2A-EE-14-81"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  Calling-Station-Id  [31]  19  "D4-3D-7E-65-4F-C1"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  107
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:   02 02 00 69 0D 80 00 00 00 5F 16 03 01 00 5A 01 00 00 56 03 01 52 C5 45 4F 07 CA B3 29 50 A7 CE 40 76 B6 BD F0 50 D4 CE 9A 8A 02 C4 3D 40 35 B5 F0 E1 E2 75  [i_ZVREO)P@vP=@5u]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:   50 00 00 18 00 2F 00 35 00 05 00 0A C0 13 C0 14 C0 09 C0 0A 00 32 00 38 00 13 00 04 01 00 00 15 FF 01 00 01 00 00 0A 00 06 00 04 00 17 00 18 00 0B 00 02 01 00             [ P/528]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:   A3 28 CE 27 20 C0 D6 2C 11 01 D6 61 1F C3 6F 03            [ (' ,ao]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  EAP-Key-Name        [102] 2   *
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  49 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43  "audit-session-id=0A1AED0B000000EE240F5BAB"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Type       [61]  6   Ethernet                  [15]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  NAS-Port            [5]   6   50001                    
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Id         [87]  17  "FastEthernet0/1"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  State               [24]  30 
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:   00 7D 00 9B 00 C1 00 40 ED B8 45 00 FC DD 50 2E DC 0E E6 03 FC 7B AD 4C B7 E7 B1 70          [ }@EP.{Lp]
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   10.26.237.11             
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS:  Acct-Session-Id     [44]  10  "000002D4"
    *Mar  8 00:03:06.928: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/84 10.26.13.59:1812, Access-Challenge, len 1188
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:  authenticator 7B 52 29 05 7E C3 EF 8E - 13 38 30 03 4B 65 64 0F
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  255
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   01 03 04 56 0D C0 00 00 05 78 16 03 01 00 51 02 00 00 4D 03 01 52 C5 45 4F 0F 04 37 77 A0 C2 68 66 4E 45 92 AB 3D 7F 94 70 AF 36  [VxQMREO7whfNE=p6]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   1D C5 17 23 5C F1 FA CA 60 B0 20 A5 48 16 D5 3F F9 B0 FF 38 1D D5 13 B3 88 13 06 EF DC 87 5C AE 17 E7 7E 80 84 21 58 64 F7 A6 36 00 35 00 00 05 FF 01 00 01 00 16 03 01 02 1C 0B 00 02 18 00 02 15 00 02 12 30 82 02 0E 30  [#\` H?8\~!Xd6500]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   82 01 77 A0 03 02 01 02 02 09 00 88 7A CB 35 3F 1E 3E 62 30 0D 06 09 2A 86 48 86 F7 0D 01 01 05 05 00 30 2F 31 15 30 13 06 03 55 04 03 13 0C 53 50  [wz5?>b0*H0/10USP]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   49 4E 41 56 44 30 30 30 30 34 31 16 30 14 06 03 55 04 0A 13 0D 50 6F 6C  [INAVD0000410UPol]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   69 63 79 4D 61 6E 61 67 65 72 30 1E 17 0D 31 33 30 38 32  [icyManager013082]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   37 30 37 32 34 33 30 5A 17 0D 31 34 30 38 32 37 30 37  [7072430Z14082707]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   32 34 33 30 5A 30 2F 31 15 30 13 06 03 55 04 03 13 0C 53 50 49 4E 41 56  [2430Z0/10USPINAV]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   44 30 30               [ D00]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  255
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   30 30 34 31 16 30 14 06 03 55 04 0A 13 0D 50 6F 6C 69 63 79 4D 61 6E 61  [00410UPolicyMana]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.004: RADIUS:   67 65 72 30 81 9F 30 0D 06 09 2A 86 48 86 F7 0D 01 01 01 05 00 03 81 8D 00 30 81 89 02 81 81 00 C9 B9 03 65 83 EB 39 86 14 BC 95 7B DB 07 7E C5 8A D7 DA C7 8A CA 5A 88 6E 0B 93 06 35 57  [ger00*H0e9{~Zn5W]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   6E DE 93 CD C9 FE 8E 9F E1 5F A9 04 5C BD A9 AD 5A 04 6E 35 47 76 A1 58 E5 C4 32 D7 49 9E 17 75 20 C6 6F 45 40  [n_\Zn5GvX2Iu oE@]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   AC EF 40 6D 15 38 F9 C2 28 7E C9 68 37 52 3B BF F4 C1 5E B8 BA 46 68 43 79 B1 65 66  [@m8(~h7R;^FhCyef]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   9E 58 ED EC 8C 95 A2 D8 BF AA 77 AC 85 90 E3 AB C6 27 3A A2 22 AC 1C 48 B3 BF BE F7 85 CF 5C BB 2D 02 03 01 00 01 A3 32 30 30 30 0F 06 03 55 1D 11 04 08 30 06 87 04 0A 1A 0D 3B 30  [Xw':"H\-2000U0;0]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   1D 06 03 55 1D 25 04 16 30 14 06 08 2B 06 01 05 05 07 03 01 06 08 2B 06 01 05 05 07 03 03 30 0D 06 09 2A 86 48 86 F7 0D 01 01          [ U?0++0*H]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  255
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   05 05 00 03 81 81 00 C4 46 3E 38 3D 53 0F 28 34 C1 A6 ED DC 70 76 9B 70 6B A8 95 7C 44 8E 7D 6E D6 8B 6D  [F>8=S(4pvpk|D}nm]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   90 49 83 06 E4 BF 68 2F 9D 77 78 A3 76 76 19 84 AD 26 3F F3 ED AA 88 52 35 0E 35 DD 00 E5 96 88 44 30 79 A0 71  [Ih/wxvv&?R55D0yq]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   8D 25 3E 77 A0 E0 43 92 33 55 40 E1 C8 EE 88 11 25 E2 70 28 11 6C 5A 4E 3D F1 93 57 0A 6F  [?>wC3U@?p(lZN=Wo]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   36 51 72 04 08 C0 C0 DF F0 94 A9 F7 A1 05 C8 37 D6 F8 D4 9C 20 1A 7B CD 2C 17 83 7B 8E 20 F7 2D B6 16 03 01 02 FC 0D 00 02 F4 03 01 02 40 02 EE 00 63 30 61 31 0B 30  [6Qr7 {,{ -@c0a10]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   09 06 03 55 04 06 13 02 55 53 31 15 30 13 06 03 55 04 0A 13 0C 44 69 67 69 43 65 72 74 20 49  [UUS10UDigiCert I]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   6E 63 31 19 30 17 06 03 55 04 0B 13 10 77 77 77 2E 64 69 67 69 63 65 72  [nc10Uwww.digicer]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   74 2E 63 6F 6D 31 20 30 1E 06 03 55 04 03 13 17 44 69 67 69 43 65 72  [t.com1 0UDigiCer]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   74 20 47 6C 6F 62 61 6C 20 52 6F 6F 74 20 43 41  [t Global Root CA]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   00 48                 [ H]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  255
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.012: RADIUS:   30 46 31 18 30 16 06 0A 09 92 26 89 93 F2 2C 64 01 19 16 08 69 6E 74 72 61 6E 65 74 31  [0F10&,dintranet1]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   12 30 10 06 0A 09 92 26 89 93 F2 2C 64 01 19 16 02 49 4E 31 16 30 14 06 03 55 04 03 13 0D 49 6E 64 69 61 20 52  [0&,dIN10UIndia R]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   6F 6F 74 20 43 41 00 4A 30 48 31 18 30 16 06 0A 09 92 26 89 93 F2 2C 64 01 19 16 08 69 6E  [oot CAJ0H10&,din]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   74 72 61 6E 65 74 31 12 30 10 06 0A 09 92 26 89 93 F2 2C 64 01 19 16 02 49 4E 31 18 30 16 06 03 55  [tranet10&,dIN10U]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   04 03 13 0F 45 6E 74 65 72 70 72 69 73 65 20 43 41 2D 31 00 4D  [Enterprise CA-1M]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   30 4B 31 18 30 16 06 0A 09 92 26 89 93 F2 2C 64 01 19 16 08 69 6E 74 72 61 6E 65 74 31  [0K10&,dintranet1]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   12 30 10 06 0A 09 92 26 89 93 F2 2C 64 01 19 16 02 49 4E 31 1B 30 19 06 03 55 04 03 13 12 49 4E 2D 53 50 49 4E  [0&,dIN10UIN-SPIN]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   43 52 54 30 30 30 30 33 2D 43 41 00 D5 30 81 D2 31 0B 30 09 06 03 55 04 06 13 02 55  [CRT00003-CA010UU]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   53 31 13 30 11 06 03 55 04              [ S10U]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  100
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   08 0C 0A 43 61 6C 69 66 6F 72 6E 69 61 31 12 30 10 06 03 55 04 07 0C 09 53 75 6E  [California10USun]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   6E 79 76 61 6C 65 31 17 30 15 06 03 55 04 0A 0C 0E 41 72 75 62 61 20 4E  [nyvale10UAruba N]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   65 74 77 6F 72 6B 73 31 40 30 3E 06 03 55 04 03 0C 37 43 6C 65  [etworks1@0>U7Cle]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   61 72 50 61 73 73 20 4F 6E 62 6F 61 72 64 20 4C  [arPass Onboard L]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   6F 63 61 6C 20 43 65 72 74 69        [ ocal Certi]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   12 75 40 41 6F 40 6B 6F A5 FE AB 85 F3 B3 CF A4           [ u@Ao@ko]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:  State               [24]  30 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.020: RADIUS:   00 6F 00 51 00 4B 00 6E EE B8 45 00 4B AA 6B A9 B6 D6 C8 CC 48 1A 91 99 7F 77 D3 C1         [ oQKnEKkHw]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.029: RADIUS(000001C7): Received from id 1645/84
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.029: RADIUS/DECODE: EAP-Message fragments, 253+253+253+253+98, total 1110 bytes
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAP_REQ for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_response, got event 7(eapReq)
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_response -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0456
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x3  length: 0x0456 type: 0xD
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Queuing an EAPOL pkt on Authenticator Q
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev:Enqueued the eapol packet to the global authenticator queue
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x0  length: 0x0006
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev:
    dot1x_auth_queue_event: Int Fa0/1 CODE= 2,TYPE= 13,LEN= 6
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAPOL frame
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Received pkt saddr =d43d.7e65.4fc1 , daddr = 0180.c200.0003,
        pae-ether-type = 888e.0100.0006
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAP packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x0  length: 0x0006
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAP packet from d43d.7e65.4fc1
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAPOL_EAP for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_request, got event 6(eapolEap)
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_request -> auth_bend_response
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): dot1x_sendRespToServer: Response sent to the server from 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_response_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.037: AAA/AUTHEN/8021X (000001C7): Pick method list 'default'
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS/ENCODE(000001C7):Orig. component type = DOT1X
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS(000001C7): Config NAS IP: 0.0.0.0
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS/ENCODE(000001C7): acct_session_id: 724
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS(000001C7): sending
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS/ENCODE: Best Local IP-Address 10.26.237.11 for Radius-Server 10.26.13.59
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS(000001C7): Send Access-Request to 10.26.13.59:1812 id 1645/85, len 253
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  authenticator 1C D7 6D 40 A3 D6 BA B1 - A7 E6 70 DA 32 83 2E 19
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  User-Name           [1]   31  "host/D0902MALL005.IN.intranet"
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  Service-Type        [6]   6   Framed                    [2]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  Framed-MTU          [12]  6   1500                     
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  Called-Station-Id   [30]  19  "D4-A0-2A-EE-14-81"
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  Calling-Station-Id  [31]  19  "D4-3D-7E-65-4F-C1"
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  8  
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:   02 03 00 06 0D 00
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:   73 1D 89 5C 66 19 32 B6 63 C2 64 C1 04 42 A9 F9           [ s\f2cdB]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  EAP-Key-Name        [102] 2   *
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  49 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43  "audit-session-id=0A1AED0B000000EE240F5BAB"
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Type       [61]  6   Ethernet                  [15]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  NAS-Port            [5]   6   50001                    
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Id         [87]  17  "FastEthernet0/1"
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  State               [24]  30 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:   00 6F 00 51 00 4B 00 6E EE B8 45 00 4B AA 6B A9 B6 D6 C8 CC 48 1A 91 99 7F 77 D3 C1         [ oQKnEKkHw]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   10.26.237.11             
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS:  Acct-Session-Id     [44]  10  "000002D4"
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.046: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.113: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/85 10.26.13.59:1812, Access-Challenge, len 378
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.113: RADIUS:  authenticator 1A 85 26 09 58 84 BC D4 - E0 A9 E3 C0 25 31 2D 31
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.113: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  255
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   01 04 01 32 0D 00 66 69 63 61 74 65 20 41 75 74 68 6F 72 69 74  [2ficate Authorit]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   79 20 28 53 69 67 6E 69 6E 67 29 31 3F 30 3D 06 09 2A  [y (Signing)1?0=*]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   86 48 86 F7 0D 01 09 01 16 30 64 36 62 62 34 66 37 30 2D 66 34 31 32 2D  [H0d6bb4f70-f412-]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   34 35 35 32 2D 61 65 65 32 2D 63 37 61 30 32 36  [4552-aee2-c7a026]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   66 62 61 32 31 38 40 65 78 61 6D 70 6C 65 2E 63  [[email protected]]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   6F 6D 00 CB 30 81 C8 31 0B 30 09 06 03 55 04 06 13 02 55 53 31 13 30 11 06 03 55 04 08 0C 0A 43 61 6C 69 66  [om010UUS10UCalif]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   6F 72 6E 69 61 31 12 30 10 06 03 55 04 07 0C 09 53 75 6E 6E 79 76 61 6C  [ornia10USunnyval]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   65 31 17 30 15 06 03 55 04 0A 0C 0E 41 72 75 62 61 20 4E 65 74 77 6F 72  [e10UAruba Networ]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   6B 73 31 36 30 34 06 03 55 04 03 0C 2D 43 6C 65 61 72 50 61 73  [ks1604U-ClearPas]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   73 20 4F 6E 62 6F 61 72 64 20 4C 6F 63 61 6C 20  [s Onboard Local ]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   43 65 72 74 69 66 69 63 61 74 65 20 41 75 74 68  [Certificate Auth]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   6F 72 69 74 79 31 3F 30 3D 06 09 2A 86 48 86 F7 0D 01 09 01 16       [ ority1?0=*H]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:  EAP-Message         [79]  55 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   30 64 36 62 62 34 66 37 30 2D 66 34 31 32 2D 34  [0d6bb4f70-f412-4]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   35 35 32 2D 61 65 65 32 2D 63 37 61 30 32 36 66  [552-aee2-c7a026f]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   62 61 32 31 38 40 65 78 61 6D 70 6C 65 2E 63 6F  [[email protected]]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   6D 0E 00 00 00                 [ m]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   4C 46 AA B9 A5 D5 DF EA DB E7 2B 7B 51 7E 58 3F          [ LF+{Q~X?]
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:  State               [24]  30 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS:   00 EF 00 B9 00 0A 00 00 EF B8 45 00 EF D2 C4 3C 81 6C 72 0E 23 FE 11 EA 12 17 50 A1            [ E
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS(000001C7): Received from id 1645/85
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.121: RADIUS/DECODE: EAP-Message fragments, 253+53, total 306 bytes
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAP_REQ for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_response, got event 7(eapReq)
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_response -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0132
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x4  length: 0x0132 type: 0xD
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.130: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Queuing an EAPOL pkt on Authenticator Q
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: dot1x-ev:Enqueued the eapol packet to the global authenticator queue
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: EAPOL pak dump rx
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: EAPOL Version: 0x1  type: 0x0  length: 0x05D4
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: dot1x-ev:
    dot1x_auth_queue_event: Int Fa0/1 CODE= 2,TYPE= 13,LEN= 1492
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): Received an EAPOL frame
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.138: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1):
    ^Z
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.180: RADIUS:  State               [24]  30 
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.180: RADIUS:   00 EF 00 B9 00 0A 00 00 EF B8 45 00 EF D2 C4 3C 81 6C 72 0E 23 FE 11 EA 12 17 50 A1            [ E
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.180: RADIUS:  NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   10.26.237.11             
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.180: RADIUS:  Acct-Session-Id     [44]  10  "000002D4"
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.180: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:07.893: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by jameela on vty0 (10.26.20.5)
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:10.225: RADIUS(000001C7): Request timed out
    *Mar  8 00:03:10.225: RADIUS: Retransmit to (10.26.13.59:1812,1813) for id 1645/86
    *Mar  8 00:03:10.225: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:13.354: RADIUS(000001C7): Request timed out
    *Mar  8 00:03:13.354: RADIUS: Retransmit to (10.26.13.59:1812,1813) for id 1645/86
    *Mar  8 00:03:13.354: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:16.307: RADIUS(000001C7): Request timed out
    *Mar  8 00:03:16.307: RADIUS: Retransmit to (10.26.13.59:1812,1813) for id 1645/86
    *Mar  8 00:03:16.307: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:19.369: RADIUS(000001C7): Request timed out
    *Mar  8 00:03:19.369: RADIUS: Retransmit to (10.26.13.59:1812,1813) for id 1645/86
    *Mar  8 00:03:19.369: RADIUS(000001C7): Started 3 sec timeout
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: RADIUS(000001C7): Request timed out
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: RADIUS: Fail-over denied to  (10.26.13.59:1812,1813) for id 1645/86
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: RADIUS: No response from (10.26.13.59:1812,1813) for id 1645/86
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: RADIUS/DECODE: parse response no app start; FAIL
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: RADIUS/DECODE: parse response; FAIL
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Received an EAP Fail
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAP_FAIL for 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_response, got event 10(eapFail)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_response -> auth_bend_fail
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_fail_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_response_fail_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: idle during state auth_bend_fail
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_fail -> auth_bend_idle
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_bend_idle_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting AUTH_FAIL on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_authenticating, got event 15(authFail)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_authenticating -> auth_authc_result
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_authenticating_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_authc_result_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending event (2) to Auth Mgr for d43d.7e65.4fc1
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'fail' from 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EE240F5BAB
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: %AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EE240F5BAB
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-redundancy: State for client  d43d.7e65.4fc1 successfully retrieved
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Received Authz fail for the client  0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting_AUTHZ_FAIL on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_authc_result, got event 22(authzFail)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_authc_result -> auth_held
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.456: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_held_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0004
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: EAP code: 0x4  id: 0x4  length: 0x0004
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting FAILOVER_RETRY on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_held, got event 21(failover_retry)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_held -> auth_restart
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_held_exit called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_restart_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending create new context event to EAP for 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_held_restart_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting !EAP_RESTART on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_restart, got event 6(no_eapRestart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_restart -> auth_connecting
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_connecting_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_restart_connecting_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting REAUTH_MAX on Client 0xB0000DBA
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_connecting, got event 11(reAuthMax)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_connecting -> auth_disconnected
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_disconnected_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): d43d.7e65.4fc1:auth_disconnected_enter sending canned failure to version 1 supplicant
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0004
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: EAP code: 0x4  id: 0x5  length: 0x0004
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): dot1x_auth_txCannedStatus: EAPOL packet sent to client 0xB0000DBA (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0xB0000DBA:auth_connecting_disconnected_reAuthMax_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: idle during state auth_disconnected
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_disconnected -> auth_restart
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending event (1) to Auth Mgr for d43d.7e65.4fc1
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev:Delete auth client (0xB0000DBA) message
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.464: dot1x-ev:Auth client ctx destroyed
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: AAA/BIND(000001C8): Bind i/f 
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: initial state auth_initialize has enter
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_initialize_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_initialize, got event 0(cfg_auto)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_initialize -> auth_disconnected
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_disconnected_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: idle during state auth_disconnected
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_disconnected -> auth_restart
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_restart_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending create new context event to EAP for 0x4A000DBB (0000.0000.0000)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: initial state auth_bend_initialize has enter
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_initialize_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: initial state auth_bend_initialize has idle
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_initialize, got event 16383(idle)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_initialize -> auth_bend_idle
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_idle_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Created a client entry (0x4A000DBB)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Dot1x authentication started for 0x4A000DBB (0000.0000.0000)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting !EAP_RESTART on Client 0x4A000DBB
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_restart, got event 6(no_eapRestart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_restart -> auth_connecting
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_connecting_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_restart_connecting_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting RX_REQ on Client 0x4A000DBB
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth Fa0/1: during state auth_connecting, got event 10(eapReq_no_reAuthMax)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: @@@ dot1x_auth Fa0/1: auth_connecting -> auth_authenticating
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_authenticating_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_connecting_authenticating_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting AUTH_START for 0x4A000DBB
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_idle, got event 4(eapReq_authStart)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_idle -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0x4A000DBB (0000.0000.0000)
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.674: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_idle_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.791: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): New client notification from AuthMgr for 0x4A000DBB - d43d.7e65.4fc1
    *Mar  8 00:03:22.791: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAP_REQ for 0x4A000DBB
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_request, got event 7(eapReq)
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_request -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_request_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    Malleswaram_2960#n
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    *Mar  8 00:03:25.761: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0x4A000DBB (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    Malleswaram_2960#no debu
    Malleswaram_2960#no debug
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): Posting EAP_REQ for 0x4A000DBB
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848:     dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: during state auth_bend_request, got event 7(eapReq)
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: @@@ dot1x_auth_bend Fa0/1: auth_bend_request -> auth_bend_request
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_request_request_action called
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-sm(Fa0/1): 0x4A000DBB:auth_bend_request_enter called
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending EAPOL packet to group PAE address
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Role determination not required
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-registry:registry:dot1x_ether_macaddr called
    Malleswaram_2960#no debug all
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-ev(Fa0/1): Sending out EAPOL packet
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    *Mar  8 00:03:28.848: dot1x-packet(Fa0/1): EAPOL packet sent to client 0x4A000DBB (d43d.7e65.4fc1)
    Malleswaram_2960#no debug all
    All possible debugging has been turned off
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.180: AAA: parse name=tty1 idb type=-1 tty=-1
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.180: AAA: name=tty1 flags=0x11 type=5 shelf=0 slot=0 adapter=0 port=1 channel=0
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.180: AAA/MEMORY: create_user (0x21D1684) user='jameela' ruser='Malleswaram_2960' ds0=0 port='tty1' rem_addr='10.26.20.5' authen_type=ASCII service=NONE priv=15 initial_task_id='0', vrf= (id=0) key=C9A1F1D1
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.389: TAC+: (-1901802859): received author response status = PASS_ADD
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.389: AAA/MEMORY: free_user (0x21D1684) user='jameela' ruser='Malleswaram_2960' port='tty1' rem_addr='10.26.20.5' authen_type=ASCII service=NONE priv=15
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.935: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.935: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'no-response' from 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.935: %AUTHMGR-7-FAILOVER: Failing over from 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.935: %AUTHMGR-7-NOMOREMETHODS: Exhausted all authentication methods for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:03:31.935: %AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#no deb
    Malleswaram_2960#no debug al
    Malleswaram_2960#no debug all
    All possible debugging has been turned off
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:04:32.677: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:04:41.938: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID
    *Mar  8 00:04:41.938: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'no-response' from 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    *Mar  8 00:04:41.938: %AUTHMGR-7-FAILOVER: Failing over from 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    *Mar  8 00:04:41.938: %AUTHMGR-7-NOMOREMETHODS: Exhausted all authentication methods for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:04:41.938: %AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:05:42.654: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:05:51.915: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID
    *Mar  8 00:05:51.915: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'no-response' from 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    *Mar  8 00:05:51.915: %AUTHMGR-7-FAILOVER: Failing over from 'dot1x' for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    *Mar  8 00:05:51.915: %AUTHMGR-7-NOMOREMETHODS: Exhausted all authentication methods for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Malleswaram_2960#
    *Mar  8 00:05:51.915: %AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed for client (d43d.7e65.4fc1) on Interface Fa0/1 AuditSessionID 0A1AED0B000000EF240F9BC3
    Pls dont worry about day and time.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Invalid content type for SOAP: TEXT/HTML; HTTP 500 Internal Server Error

    Hi, I have this error on a SOAP Receiver Channel: invalid content type for SOAP: TEXT/HTML; HTTP 500 Internal Server Error I've found several threads on SDN Forums about similar errors, but I did not find a solution for my problem yet. I checked this

  • Printing black and white with color accent

    I am trying to figure out how the make a photo black and white and just have a flower colored. I have Photoshop 9 and am a beginner. Please help!  Thanks.

  • DAQmx on Debian

    First off, I am not using LabView. I am running Debian 3.1 (sarge) on kernel 2.4.20. I downloaded the DAQmx base from NI's site, and tried to install it. I had to convert each individual RPM to a .deb using alien, then install the .deb's using dpkg.

  • Help.. theme in wrong place??

    i completed my first movie on 09. however, when i got it to burn the theme and chapter selection came at the end if the movie. at the beginning all of my titles, trans etc are correct but the theme is missing. when i look at the map, the drop zone is

  • Odd hyperlink behaviour in Firefox

    I wonder if anyone else is experiencing problems with hyperlinks in webhelp running on Firefox? I have created a new webhelp system - nothing clever such as merging - just 70 or so topics.The help contains hyperlinks to other topics in the webhelp -