Cisco 3560G and max MTU Size

Hello
I have an Cisco 3560G with an version 15.0(1)SE2 IOS. I want to forward Jumbo frames (ISCSI packets) through this switch.
On my SAN, each interface have been configured on 9000 bytes.
On this switch, I have this output :
Sw1#sh system mtu
System MTU size is 1500 bytes
System Jumbo MTU size is 9000 bytes
System Alternate MTU size is 1500 bytes
Routing MTU size is 1500 bytes
Sw1#
I would like to know how to increase, if possible, the Jumbo MTU to 9198 bytes. I want to do that because the 9000 bytes ISCSI packets normally will been encapsuled using vlan so the ethernet packet will increase to 9022 (Ethernet 18bytes and extra 4 bytes for vlan).
If the Jumbo MTU reconfiguration is not possible, the ISCSI packets will be fragmented each time it forwarded through the switch isn't it ??
Thanks in advance for your help.
Have a nice day
Matt

Hi Bilal
Thanks for your reply.
In the document, Cisco add note on the top of the webpage on the Components Used : "Note: In all the examples in this document, unless specifically mentioned, all values that quote MTU in bytes omit the 18 bytes for the Ethernet header and Frame Check Sequence (FCS)."
So In my mind, the 3560G switch will not drop 9018 ethernet bytes but will normally drop the vlan Jumbo frames (9022 ethernet bytes).
I think Cisco will included the Ethernet header and FCS on the document because networks admins included it and not think to on payload data.
Matt

Similar Messages

I'm using mac OSX 10.9.5 to write to NAS, I need to decrease the SMB max MTU size used by the OSX

I'm using mac OSX 10.9.5 to write to NAS, I need to decrease the SMB max MTU size used by the OSX

By default, OS X Mavericks 10.9.5 Network MTU is set to 1500. If you perform the following at your SMB server, with an MTU of 1500, you will likely receive Message too long, and the SMB share takes a very long while to mount. This might be the contributing factor that has you believe it is an SMB MTU configuration issue.
ping -c 1 -D -s 1500 smbserver
If you dial the Network MTU down in a custom setting, the ping is immediate, and the SMB share mounts briskly. I tried values in small decrements until the message too long ceased.
ping -c 1 -D -s 1472 smbserver
I have done some searching and I do not see how, in Apple's current SMB implementation, that one can configure /etc/nsmb.conf to reduce SMB MTU size. See man nsmb.conf.
More on this subject.

SharePoint - Error_1_Error occurred in deployment step 'Add Solution': Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was rea

Hi,
I am Shanmugavel, SharePoint developer,
I am facing the below SharePoint 2013 deployment issue while deploying using VS2012.
If i will deploy the same wsp or existing wsp
(last build) using direct powershell deployment, the solution adding properly, but the same timeout exception coming while activation the features. Please find the below error.
I tried the below activists:
1. Restarted my dev server, DB server.
2. tried the same solution id different server
3. tried existing wsp file (last build version)
4. Deactivated all the features, including project Active deployment configuration.... but still i am facing the same issue.
I hope this is not coding level issue, because still my code is not start running, before that some problem coming.
Please help me any one..... Last two days i am struck because of this...

What you need to understand is the installation of a WSP does not do much. It just makes sure that you relevant solution files are deployed to the SharePoint farm.
Next comes the point when you activate the features. It is when the code which you have written to "Activate" certain features for your custom solution.
Regarding the error you are getting, it typically means that you have more connections (default is I guess 100) open for a SQL database then you are allowed to.
If you have a custom database and you are opening a connection, make sure you close it as well.
Look at the similar discussion here:
The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool
size was reached[^]
I would suggest further to look at the
ULS logs[^] to get better insight.
Manas Bhardwaj's Stream : www.manasbhardwaj.net

Minimum and max lot size

Hai All,
Can anyone please tell exactly from which table we can get the data "Minimum and max lot size".
Is it "MAST" or "PLKO" or "MARC"?

Hi Kavitha,
check with the table MARC and the fileds BSTMI (Minimum lot size ) BSTMA ( Maximum lot size )
for more info
Re: Table for Lot size.......
hope it helps you.
Thanks!
Edited by: Prasanth on Mar 7, 2009 7:26 PM

Restore dvd and MAX HDD size

Hi, I assume I have a HDD with a problem, someone gave me this powerbook without DVD s. Used to boot fine but now it just does not. On the apple site I dont see links to buy older (pre intel) OSX disks so I can not run disk utilities or reinstall. Where can I buy and download OSX images that I can create a bootdvd with, from my PC.
Suppose the HDD is broken, what s the maximum HDD size. Smallest I can get here is 180Gb, originall disk is 60Gb. Here s what is written in battery bay:
1.3ghz/256Mb/60Gb/Combo/BT/APX

There are several possibilities if you're in the US - don't know about Italy.
Get original replacement system discs - You can call Apple Customer Support 1-800-767-2775, provide the Serial Number and specifications of the Mac, and for a fee, a replacement set of system discs (if available), can be ordered. However, the discs will be for the original version of OS, that was pre-installed, when the Mac was manufactured.
Tiger install DVDs are in short supply. Tiger is no longer available at the Apple Store *but may be available for $129 by calling Apple Phone Sales @ 1-800-MY-APPLE (1-800-692-7753)*. For other sources, do a Google search for MA453Z/A (10.4.6), MA190Z/A (10.4.3) and M9639Z/A (10.4) . Also look on eBay. Be sure & buy a retail version (black with silver X) and not a model specific version (gray) (See Can I use another Mac's system restore disc on my Mac? ). Expect to pay (possibly a lot) more than the Apple list price of $129.
After you install the base 10.4.x, update to the final Tiger version 10.4.11. Here's the link for the 10.4.11 combo update http://support.apple.com/kb/TA24901?viewlocale=en_US
Look at this link Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger Installing Software Support Page
http://www.apple.com/support/tiger/install/
You can also download the Tiger Installation and Setup Guide
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/TigerInstall_SetupGuide.pdf
When you upgrade the OS, do it via Archive & Install. See About the Archive and Install feature http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1710
Be sure to select Preserve Users & Settings. Also, repair permissions before and after the install.
Leopard is the max OS you can install, but Leopard is no longer available at the Apple Store *but may be available by calling Apple Phone Sales @ 1-800-MY-APPLE (1-800-692-7753)*.
Installing Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1544
Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Installation and Setup Guide
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/leopard_install-setup.pdf
After you install the base 10.5, download & install the 10.5.8 combo update at http://support.apple.com/downloads/MacOS_X_10_5_8_ComboUpdate
You can use the larger HD.
 Cheers, Tom
Another possibility - contact an Apple User Group near you http://appleusergroups.com/locator/find/locate.cgi?country=31
Message was edited by: Texas Mac Man

Looking for average and max redo size generated per second

Please,
I'm implementing Dataguard physical standby on Oracle 10g R2 on Windows 2003.
My issue is now how could I get redo size generated per second to compare with the actual bandwidth between primary and standby database.
I know I can use the Database Console, but It wasn't installed at the database production.
There's any link or script or view that I could use to resolve this issue?Thanks

It depends on the statmemnst and the datatpyes that are inserted or update or deleted
select b.name,a.value from v$sesstat a, v$statname b where a.statistic#=b.statistic# and b.name = 'redo size' and a.sid=<your SID>;
courtesy to Daljit

Slow FTP throughput using solaris 9 and max window size question

I am working on a solution where we are trying to FTP at a high rate across the WAN on OC-12 links. We have been doing some TCP tuning with consideration to the Bandwidth Delay Product. Ping results in a 90ms RTT.
I have been told that we will not see any increase in performance above window sizes of 64k without certain patches for Solaris 9. I know that high speed transfers are possible if tuned up correctly with other operating systems.
Does anyone have any knowledge or experiences that they could share with me?
Thanks

You will have to format your disk with the help of the WRT350N and after that you will have creat Share with same "Storage" tab on the linksys router.

MTU Size Issue on Cisco 3560 Switch

Could anybody tell me how to change MTU Size on a Cisco 3560 Switch.i mean to say whether it is to be changed on FastEthernet Interfaces or on VLAN 1 or on Global Configuration Mode and with which Command to change it.

I am using MPLS on my Routers and the MTU size i have set on my Router Interfaces is 1524.
When i do a normal ping from Customer's one site to another (where my Traffic has to pass through this Switch VLAN)i get a reply , but when a Ping with a Byte Size of 1500 or more the Packets get completely dropped.
I think due to MTU Mistach bet. Switch and Router the Packets r getting droped,that is why i was trying to change it.
could the Packets get dropped because of this reason.Please suggest.

Min max lot size time based for use with SNP and PPDS

Hi all, Is there anyway to set up time based min and max lot sizes? ie we want to have a Max lot size which is small for use with the first 3 months of our plan which starts life in SNP and then converts to PPDS and into blocks for block planning, but months 4 to 36 we want to leave as large max lot sizes as there is no need to have the small max lot sizes for the different horizon.
As far as I can see there is only a material/plant lot size and Max lot size and no way to have a different setting in a different time period.
Thanks
j

Hi John,
As you know, in the product master, the lot size maintenance is time-independent, so that obviously can not be used for your scenario. As per my understanding, to meet this using standard functionality, you can maintain multiple product specific t-lanes (for STRs) and PDSs (planned orders) with required lot size ranges and validity dates (for short or long term horizon). But, again since the validity of t-lanes and PDSs will not be automatically rolling forward so the updating the validities will be a challenge.
The other option could be to enhance the heuristic functionality at lot size selection step while creating order.
Regards,
Umesh

EIGRP MTU Size Causing Neighbor Flap - Pls help!

I've been reading the post here which is quite good but, I have some outstanding questions I hope someone can help me with?
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/43100#233367
Essentially, we have a DCI which is an evpl link - layer 2. The evpl connection is terminated with a Cisco 3925 at each location (once it comes out of the provider's Ciena box). It is a dot1g tagged trunk - L2 connection. We are running EIGRP between the two. Before setting up OTV, all link sizes were 1500 MTU...which obviously will not work with OTV....and it didnt!. OTV is running on 7Ks a few hops away from each 3925. So, I went on each and every link - (pain stakingly) and configured MTU size for 9216 - enabling jumboframes at the system level too where applicable. What do you know, OTV started working and i could ping to at least up to 2000 bytes with DF-bit set too! (I didn't try any higher).
Last night, our provider did some 'maintenance' without telling us - which brought the link down. The link was 'down' even after the maintenace was completed. After looking in the logs and seeing this, I suspected it had to do with MTU sizes after quickly googling around.
May 13 12:33:13.698: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is down: Interface PEER-TERMINATION received
May 13 12:33:13.976: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is up: new adjacency
May 13 12:33:24.266: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by izzi on vty0 (10.241.6.12)
May 13 12:34:00.286: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is down: Interface PEER-TERMINATION received
May 13 12:34:00.616: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is up: new adjacency
May 13 12:34:46.922: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is down: Interface PEER-TERMINATION received
May 13 12:34:47.280: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is up: new adjacency
May 13 12:35:37.364: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is down: holding time expired
May 13 12:37:29.725: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by izzi on vty0 (10.241.6.12)
May 13 12:37:47.430: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is up: new adjacency
May 13 12:39:01.508: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by izzi on vty0 (10.241.6.12)
May 13 12:39:11.943: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is down: Interface PEER-TERMINATION received
May 13 12:39:13.973: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 10: Neighbor 198.28.132.30 (GigabitEthernet0/0.2) is up: new adjacency
So, I reduced the MTU size back to 1500 and low and behold, adjacency stayed. Let me also say that there weren't any errors on the links too. So, I decided to try and increase the MTU back up to 9216 - OTV started working again and adjancey held - it didnt flap. I thought for a second and decided to bounce the link. Once i did this, EIGRP started flapping again with the same exact behavior. After calling the provider, they claim that their max MTU is only 1522 for our EVPL link. I don't see this being possible since I was able to ping DF-BIT set way above 1522. Maybe I'm missing something. We are going to coordinate with them to increase the MTU size on the link. But why/how did it work to begin with - especially since OTV doesn't support fragmenation....I understand that OTV adjacency can still form since ISIS only needs 14xx something...but I wasn't able to get certain protocals/services like esxi host management to work via OTV until i increased MTU size.
Also, after reading the above article it sounds like EIGRP will 'peer' or decide on MTU of it's update packets? If that's the case, maybe the bouncing of the link allowed EIGRP to negotiate it's packet sizes to above 1500 and that's why if I change the MTU size to above 1500 everything works fine - OTV/2000 byte bf-bit set ping, until I bounce the link? If this is the case, is there anyway to 'force' EIGRP to use 1500 for it's packets for its protocol traffic and allow everything else to use the MTU set on the link?
I would appreciate any help explaining this - hopefully you're not as confused as I was after reading it again!

Did you ever find the root cause and this solution for this? We are experiencing the same issues with our 2 4500 Catalyst and a couple of routers on our inter routing VLAN that we use for only the 2 chassis and a couple of router. MTU is already set at 1500 on the 2 chassis.
005326: Jan 19 11:30:02: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.21 (Vlan990) is down: Peer goodbye received
005327: Jan 19 11:30:05: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.1 (Vlan990) is up: new adjacency
005328: Jan 19 11:30:05: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.21 (Vlan990) is up: new adjacency
005329: Jan 19 11:30:07: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.12 (Vlan990) is down: holding time expired
005330: Jan 19 11:30:27: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.21 (Vlan990) is down: Peer goodbye received
005331: Jan 19 11:30:28: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.11 (Vlan990) is down: Peer goodbye received
005332: Jan 19 11:30:28: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.1 (Vlan990) is down: Peer goodbye received
005333: Jan 19 11:30:30: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.12 (Vlan990) is up: new adjacency
005334: Jan 19 11:30:30: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.11 (Vlan990) is up: new adjacency
005335: Jan 19 11:30:30: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.1 (Vlan990) is up: new adjacency
005336: Jan 19 11:30:32: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 65001: Neighbor 10.190.254.21 (Vlan990) is up: new adjacency

The reporting service web service connection pool reached the max pool size

I got a problem that it throw an exception "The timeout peroid elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connection was in use and max pool size was reached."
The satuation is our service use 15 thread to render report, but sometimes we met such exception I list above. I didn't change any configuration in rsreportserver.config, and it seems the connection to reportserver database from reporting service web
service was not disposed.
Is there any configuration I can modify to fix this issue?

Hi Dexter,
In your case, we can try to increasing the size of the connection pool to resolve the issue. By default, the Max Pool Size is 100. You can refer to the similar issue below:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c57c0432-c27b-45ab-81ca-b2df76c911ef/timeout-expired-the-timeout-period-elapsed-prior-to-obtaining-a-connection-from-the-pool?forum=adodotnetdataproviders
Since the issue is related with ADO.NET. I suggestion you post the question in the following forum:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=adodotnetdataproviders
It is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
Regards,
Alisa Tang
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support

How do you change the MTU size in a Cisco 871?

This 871 is at a remote site and is an ezvpn IPsec client (network extension mode) back to a 3030 headend.
We're having problems with a PC trying to connect through the IPsec tunnel and we think it may be an MTU size problem.
Int F4 is the outside interface.
We are using a virtual-template associated with the crypto ipsec client ezvpn statement.
When I go into any of the 871 interfaces and type 'mtu 1370' it errors out with 'The F4 (or whatever interface) does not allow manual MTU size configuration.
If I type 'ip mtu 1370' on F4 (or vlan1 or virtual-template 1) this is accepted, but when I do a 'show int f 4', it still shows MTU of 1514 - even after a reload.
What is the correct way to set the MTU size in the 871 router - and is it best set on the F4 interface, the vlan, or the virtual-template interface?

Hi
As per the supporting doc Cisco 871 has one want ethernet interface and 2 switch ports.
I feel you are trying to change the mtu under the switch port which may not be possible.
You can refer the below link for more info..
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/products_data_sheet0900aecd8028a976.html
regds

System MTU size on Cisco switch

after setting sys mtu to something other than 1500 on a WS-C3750G-24TS-1U it appears that this setting will stay in effect even if the startup config is erased and the switch is reloaded. My question is. Does this mean that if I need to replace the switch and I just load a saved version of the config and the vlan.dat files. Most likley if I am running a non default MTU this will not be in effect on the new switch.

Hi IP,
if i was understood properly, you have changed the MTU size of cisco 3750 from default 1500 bytes to 1998(eg.) now even after restarting the switch, this MTU size doesn't come to the default value of 1500 bytes & also when you tried put this config & vlan.dat file you wanted to know whether this changed MTU value will be in effect. Answer is NO, bcoz config & vlan.dat doesn't contain this MTU settings. but you can again manually change the MTU size to 1500 bytes & restart the switch.
hope this helps.
rate this post if it is been clarified.

Recommended MTU Size setting within the router and...

Hello!
I was wondering what MTU Size do you guys recomended me setting within the Router Interface
and on Windows for best performance when on a BT Broadband service?
Note: It's not a BT Router i'm using, i'm using a Netgear DG834N.
I am sure BT Routers like the HomeHub have a MTU Size of 1500 set in the Router Interface, am I correct?
My Netgear DG834N has a MTU Size of 1458 in the Router Interface by default.
Thanks for responding.

Personally I was able to squeeze about 11KB/s more out of my 8128Kbps line by setting my MTU to '1430', maxing out my throughput at (after the change): 859KB/s. I'm on a 20CN DSLAM so it might be different on a 21CN MSAN.
Why not experiment? You can't hurt your line (As long as your router's firmware doesn't reset your ADSL sync everytime you change it - If it does then DLM might have something to say ).
Like this post? Give it a Star . If this post answers your question, please Mark it as the Accepted Solution.

If MTU size will increase in cisco 3550 does it will impact any traffic ?

For WiFi traffic from source to destination MTU size should ping up to 1472 Now the MTU is pinging up to 1468 because port level MTU size is 1500 we need to increase 1522.
while we changing size it will impact my traffic ?
Model number: WS-C3550-24-DC-SMI
#sh version
Cisco IOS Software, C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(25)SEE4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).
Any suggestions on this.
Thanks in advance.
NagaPrasad

Hello Prasad,
Changing the MTU size in general will not cause any impact except if it is VPC domain.
But it is advisible that MTU size keep same at both ends.
FYI...
Changing the MTU value (with the mtu interface configuration command) can affect the IP MTU value. If the current IP MTU value is the same as the MTU value, and you change the MTU value, the IP MTU value will be modified automatically to match the new MTU. However, the reverse is not true; changing the IP MTU value has no effect on the value for the mtu command.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

Cisco 3560G and max MTU Size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for