Cisco 4003 series switch

Hi...All.
In cisco 4003 series switch i m getting error in post test its says , rtc failed, after that supervisorengineer wxx4012 LED status is Red.can any one tell me wt that means and hw to solve that problem.

plz fine the post test script...
003-B-Ground> (enable) 0:00.523556: Please set IPAddr variable
0:00.524147: Please set Netmask variable
0:00.524511: Please set Broadcast variable
0:00.525113: Please set TftpServer variable to do tftp downloads
0:00.525658: Network is not configured
WS-X4012 bootrom version 5.4(1), built on 2000.02.17 18:28:09
H/W Revisions: Meteor: 4 Comet: 8 Board: 2
Supervisor MAC addresses: 00:02:16:d2:5a:00 through 00:02:16:d2:5d:ff (1024 addr
esses)
Installed memory: 64 MB
Testing LEDs.... done!
The system will autoboot in 5 seconds.
Type control-C to prevent autobooting.
rommon 1 >
The system will now begin autobooting.
Autobooting image: "bootflash:cat4000.5-4-2.bin"
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC#############################
Starting Off-line Diagnostics
Mapping in TempFs
Board type is WS-X4012
DiagBootMode value is "post"
Telling ApkPageMan that we have 12288 pages of memory
Loading diagnostics...
Power-on-self-test for Module 1: WS-X4012
Status: (. = Pass, F = Fail)
processor: . cpu sdram: . rtc: F
eprom: . nvram: . flash: .
temperature sensor: . enet console port: . switch port 0: .
switch port 1: . switch port 2: . switch port 3: .
switch port 4: . switch port 5: . switch port 6: .
switch port 7: . switch port 8: . switch port 9: .
switch port 10: . switch port 11: . switch registers: .
switch sram: .
Module 1 Failed
Power-on-self-test for Module 2: not present
Port status: (. = Pass, F = Fail)
Module 2 Ignored
Power-on-self-test for Module 3: not present
Port status: (. = Pass, F = Fail)
Module 3 Ignored
Exiting Off-line Diagnostics
Failed Module Bringup Process
Use 'show test 1' to see results of tests.
Cisco Systems, Inc. Console

Similar Messages

Cisco MDS series switch details

Hello I 'm new to CISCO Switch world.
I 'm working as Clariion Admin and have have taken up the responsibilty to manage switches.Since,i am a novice i need little guidance on how work on cisco switches.I know the Zoning (how zoning done on MDS 9000 series switches) part ,but would like to venture deep into the details on CISCO MDS series switches.
Like, the use of Port channels etc.
Will really appreciate if some one can help me with a link or place ( not the configuration guide) where in i can find details on concentrated more on the theory part .
Thanks in advance!

Actually the best info is in the configuration guides. There are some external companies that run training sessions on the MDS to provide in depth training. There is the MDS cookbook available on CCO that is also a good point of information. If you search on 'MDS white papers' after you login into Cisco.com, there are several good documents that might meet your needs.
Hope this hels,
Mike

Cisco 4500 series switch

Dear support taem, in cisco 4500 series switch i am getting error interface TenGigabitethernet 1/14 utlization threshold violated.current in traffic 705.228 (70.52 %) and out traffic 707.462 ( 70.75 %) whereas configured threshold is 30 %.
i have checked on switch but qos is there in configuration.
where i need to check if any restriction is there for incoming and outgoing traffic.
and what necassery troubleshooting i need to be done.

This looks like a policy shaping.

Cisco 500 series switches

Dear support,
Can Cisco 500 series switches deliver 24V on the access port for POE operation?
Best Regards

I belive the 802..2F and 802.2at poe standard is strictly 48v. I haven't found anything to the contrary. There are inline convertes 48v-24v or something like this that can be used with a non poe switch: http://www.digital-loggers.com/poe24.html but that means all conected device would be off the same access port / vlan.

Cisco 300 series switches with 802.3at standard

I'm a bit confused as to which of the 300 series switches supports the 802.3at standard. According to the website, the SG300-28P supports it. But in the quick start guide for the 300 series, only the MP models (excluding the SF302-08MP and SG300-10MP) including the SG300-52P has it. Can someone give me a difinitive answer to this? Thanks!

LJ,
P = PoE capable. On the 300 series, half of the ports can provide 15.4W, or all can provide half that.
PoE+ is NOT SUPPORTED.
MP = Maximum Power. This means that all ports can provide up to 15.4W. PoE+ is supported on some models only.
PP = PoE Plus. Can provide up to 30W on a single port. Note the maximum PoE budget for each switch. Also,
half of the ports can provide 15.4W, or all can provide half that - any extra power used by PoE+
MPP = Maximum Power and PoE Plus. This means that all ports can provide up to 15.4W - any extra power used by PoE+
According to the Data Sheet:
"Switches support 802.3at PoE+, 802.3af, and Cisco pre-standard (legacy) PoE. Maximum power of 30.0W to any 10/100 or Gigabit Ethernet port for PoE+ supported devices and 15.4W for PoE supported devices, until the PoE budget for the switch is reached"
The PoE+ models are brand new and are not widey available yet. I did a web search for SG300-28PP and found that at least a few online resellers have it in stock.
- Marty
Message was edited by: Martin Pyhala

Unable to hard code the ports of cisco 3750x series switch

hello,
I have tried with hardcode to 1000 7 Full on the ports which are connected to another switch.
After changing the port to auto from one side of the switch port came up. Is there any solution to make port up when both sides are hard coded to 1000 & full duplex.
Simple Words:
Switch 1 --> Switch 2 --> Hard coded to 1000 & Full --> Down.
Switch 1 --> Switch 2 --> Auto on one end to Switch 1 --> Up.
Switch model:
Switch 1 Cisco 3750x (Gi Switch)
Switch 2 Cisco 3750 (Gi Switch)
Regards,
Ezra.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Yes, it's possible without a straight through cable, enable auto/auto both sides. Otherwise you'll need a cross-over cable.
BTW, if your standard is hard coding copper gig ports, for speed and duplex, you might consider bringing your standard up to date. Copper gig standard went much further in how auto/auto is supposed to work. By disabling auto/auto, I believe, you're also disabling some error monitoring too. Generally, all the major players, e.g. Cisco, would recommend auto/auto for copper gig Ethernet.

Cisco 2960 Series Switch Architecture

Hi all,
I wanted to know if there is a document or an article which describes 2960 series architecture specifically for model WS-C2960-24-S as there is for 2600 series in the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/routers/2600-series-multiservice-platforms/23852-2600-architecture-23852.html
Thanks.

Hi,
You should be able to find the information that you need here:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/switches/catalyst-2960-24-s-switch/model.html
Thanks,
Jake

Cisco 300 series switches

hi all
Ive looked through some of the online content but dont see a definitive answer to my question about the physical size of the switches, are they all 19" rack mountable or desktop?
I look forward to a confirmation..

LJ,
P = PoE capable. On the 300 series, half of the ports can provide 15.4W, or all can provide half that.
PoE+ is NOT SUPPORTED.
MP = Maximum Power. This means that all ports can provide up to 15.4W. PoE+ is supported on some models only.
PP = PoE Plus. Can provide up to 30W on a single port. Note the maximum PoE budget for each switch. Also,
half of the ports can provide 15.4W, or all can provide half that - any extra power used by PoE+
MPP = Maximum Power and PoE Plus. This means that all ports can provide up to 15.4W - any extra power used by PoE+
According to the Data Sheet:
"Switches support 802.3at PoE+, 802.3af, and Cisco pre-standard (legacy) PoE. Maximum power of 30.0W to any 10/100 or Gigabit Ethernet port for PoE+ supported devices and 15.4W for PoE supported devices, until the PoE budget for the switch is reached"
The PoE+ models are brand new and are not widey available yet. I did a web search for SG300-28PP and found that at least a few online resellers have it in stock.
- Marty
Message was edited by: Martin Pyhala

Cisco 4500 series switch-Supervisor Engine.

Is it possible to add two different supervisor engine module in a chassis(WS-C4507R+E Chassis)? (WS-X45-SUP7E in slot 3 and WS-X45-SUP6E-
Redundancy in slot number 4)

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/31sga/configuration/guide/RPR.html
Redundancy requires both supervisor engines in the chassis to be of the same supervisor engine model (same model, same memory, NFL daughter card and so on), and to use the same Cisco IOS software image.
Thanks
Hari.Sivaji

Scripting reboot for Cisco 300 Series switches

I would like to have some help putting together a script for rebooting our 300 series POE switches. I have about 150 at this stage to administer and it would make it much easier not to have to remotely reboot them. The IP settings will be the same for each location and we have about 2-5 in each location. I will be logging in through logmein to each remote server, and will run the scripts from this to the local switches. Any help would be appreciated.

I was playing with my Indigo on an SG-500 and it seems to work. Create a session for each switch and in the session properties for each switch enter your crendentials (user/pass) IP/port, etc, I was using telnet, port 23 for this and then under the send command tab, on connection I entered:
reload
y
One command per line up to 20 commands I believe and it connected, I saw my prompts and replies and then shutting down.
So if you try this you can just go down the file tree list for switches with cameras than need a reboot and restart the entire switch if you like, quick and easy.
You could also add a folder for each switch and a session in that folder possibly for each camera/port with online port number changing for each camera in the session properties and then selectively cycle power for just the affected cameras.
Example for port 22/camera xxxx:
conf t
int gi22
power inline never
power inline auto
It would take a fair amount of time to set up but once done you could just pick a switch folder and the port in that switch to cycle. If you have multiple port on a switch you could use
conf t
int range gi22-24
or
int range gi1,6,16,20
power inline never
power inline auto
might have to verify that syntax

Access-list in Cisco 3560 Series Switch

Guys,
I will be implementing access-lists in 3560 switch. Hope you can help me with the configuration. I'm planning to block all ports by default and only allow ports that the user need to access. The ports will be as follows, tcp - 80, 81, 8080, 25, 110, 143. For udp - 23 and port used by IP Phone.
Hope you can help me guys.
Thanks,
John

and then dont forget to call this access-list on the interface or vlan you want to apply it.
You can use a number for the ACL > 100 or a name as indicated earlier.
If you go with just a number :
access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 80 81 ...
access-list 100 permit udp any any eq 23
int g1/0/1
ip access-group NAME in
OR
ip access-group 100 in
As for example :
NMS-3750-A(config-if)#ip acc
NMS-3750-A(config-if)#ip access-group ?
<1-199> IP access list (standard or extended)
<1300-2699> IP expanded access list (standard or extended)
WORD Access-list name

Power Redundancy problem for cisco 3750 stack switches

Hi Team,
I have installed and configured cisco 3750X series switches in stackwise. Those are having dual power supply.
Power redundancy test performed:
1. Removed one of the power supply and inserted it back.
2. once the first power supply is ready, removed another power supply and switch got rebooted.
please find the below stack-power output:
JP2-RDC-DIS-02#sh stack-power detail
Power Stack           Stack   Stack    Total   Rsvd    Alloc   Unused Num Num
Name                  Mode    Topolgy Pwr(W) Pwr(W) Pwr(W) Pwr(W) SW   PS
Powerstack-2          SP-PS   Stndaln 700     477     223     0       1    2
Powerstack-1          SP-PS   Stndaln 700     477     223     0       1    2
Power stack name: Powerstack-2
    Stack mode: Power sharing
    Stack topology: Standalone
    Switch 2:
        Power budget: 223
        Power allocated: 223
        Low port priority value: 22
        High port priority value: 13
        Switch priority value: 4
        Port 1 status: Not connected
        Port 2 status: Not connected
        Neighbor on port 1: 0000.0000.0000
        Neighbor on port 2: 0000.0000.0000
Power stack name: Powerstack-1
    Stack mode: Power sharing
    Stack topology: Standalone
    Switch 1:
        Power budget: 223
        Power allocated: 223
        Low port priority value: 22
        High port priority value: 13
        Switch priority value: 4
        Port 1 status: Not connected
        Port 2 status: Not connected
        Neighbor on port 1: 0000.0000.0000
        Neighbor on port 2: 0000.0000.0000
Can anyone help what went wrong here?
Thanks
Manish

Cosmetic bug
CSCui21029    3750X Stack no standalone stays in running configureation as standalone
Symptom:
When you are configuring a 3750x stack and initially putting it into a stack ring topology by configuring the following.
Switch(config)#stack-power switch 1
Switch(config-switch-stackpower)#sta
Switch(config-switch-stackpower)#no stan
Switch(config-switch-stackpower)#no standalone
You will see that in the running configuration it shows up as standalone mode
stack-power switch 1
switch mode: standalone
stack-power switch 2
switch mode: standalone
Conditions:
3750X stacks with any license level
Workaround:
none

Cisco 500 Series 802.1x Requirements

Hello,
Does anyone have a guide on how to setup 802.1x on the Cisco 500 Series Switches.
I have done the whole implamentation in the past with Catalysts and ACS.
But would like to see a guide for the 500 series.
Do we need the Cisco ACS or can we use RADIUS on Windows?

Hi Peter, you may use IAS or any radius you prefer. To my knowledge the admin guide is the only documentation. You may check the Cisco knowledgd base as well.

Increasing TFTP block size for 2960 series switches

I have read that some Cisco components can increase the default TFTP block size to values greater than 512 bytes by using the command -
ip tftp blocksize xxxx
This doesn't seem to be available on Cisco 2960 series switches. Is there a way to do this with the 2960's?

I have moved a WS-C2960-24LC-S running LanLite to 12.2(55)SE9 - the current end of the line for this switch - and indeed the command is not present. Sooo....this appears to be a limitation of LanLite.
My predecessor implemented about 70 switches with LanLite. I put a stop to this about a year ago but it is going to take some time to flush them out of the inventory.
Thanks for your response.

Ethernet over Public link with Cisco 65XX Series

We are transferring some equipment from one datacenter to another and we do not have private line connectivity between them at the current time.
We are hoping to be able to temporarily be able to establish some type of Layer2 connectivity between the facilities to help allow us to spread out the migration into 2 events. We have Cisco 65XX series switches at the core at both facilities and I am wondering what we might be able to use to make this happen?
EoMPLS is out as we have to be able to extend the layer2 functionality across carrier networks and L2TPv3 is not supported on Cisco 65XX from what I have read / checked on our switches (if there is an IOS version that does support it, please let me know).
I have read a bit about VPLS over GRE but I am not clear on the configuration and/or if it supported as it references MPLS at various points within the documentation that I have read.
Any guidance would be appreciated.

I've absolutely no idea if this would help in your case.
But anyway, I think 6500 handles DMVPN. May be MPLS over DMVPN would be a solution?
https://sites.google.com/site/amitsciscozone/home/important-tips/traffic-engineering/p2mp-mpls-te-over-dmvpn
http://networkknerd.blogspot.be/2014/08/dmvpn-mpls-over-dmvpn-oh-yeah.html
HTH

Cisco 4003 series switch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for