Cisco 7600-es20-ge3c and Cisco ws-x6724-sfp

We have a Cisco 7606-S with the following cards installed:
7600-ES20-GE3C
WS-X6724-SFP
Aren't both of the above cards 1 gigabit line cards? What is the difference between the two cards? Not sure why we have the two different cards installed.

Hi,
The architecture is different for both the cards which make it a choice for different scenarios. For example, WS-6724 supports more on LAN related technologies supported while ES20 supports feature like EVC, label imposition etc.
In short, WS-6724 is a LAN car while ES20 is a WAN card.
A detailed explanation about the feature support will be available in datasheet.
-Nagendra

Similar Messages

OSM-2+4GE-WAN vs new 7600-ES20-GE3CXL card

Please can you provide me information about differencess between those 2 modules, considering MPLS support. I am interested in VPLS feature support. Is this new ES20 card support non H-VPLS, like situation where we have access or trunk (dot1q) port on same 7600 router on WS-X6724 SFP card where is MPLS uplink realized with this ES20 card. Generaly,which card OSM or ES20 is better solution for MPLS (L3VPN, EoMPLS and VPLS)feature.

The 7600-ES20-GE3CXL card has following MPLS features
Layer 2 VPNs
? EoMPLS with MAC learning
? H-VPLS (MPLS Edge or IEEE 802.1ad Edge)
? Flexible QinQ
? Layer 3 VPNs
? MPLS VPN (RFC 2547-bis)
? Inter-AS and Carrier-Supporting-Carrier
? Multicast VPN
Following links may help you
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_data_sheet0900aecd8057f3ad.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801e5bfa.html#wp1002608

Cisco 4503 "1000BaseLH" SFP light is not coming

Dear Team,
I have Cisco 4503 and I have inserted 1000BaseLH and light is not coming up but for 1000BaseSX its fine.
Please suggest.
CORE#show int GigabitEthernet1/18
GigabitEthernet1/18 is down, line protocol is down (notconnect)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet Port, address is 001e.4aa6.b891 (bia 001e.4aa6.b891)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, Auto-speed, link type is auto, media type is 1000BaseLH
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts (0 multicast)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
CORE#show inventory
NAME: "GigabitEthernet1/18", DESCR: "1000BaseLH"
PID: TRF5735AALB202 , VID: A1 , SN: OPA11241478
Thank You,
Abhisar.

Thanks Marvin,
It is solved.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12464296/cisco-4503-1000baselh-sfp-light-not-coming-urgent
Thank You,
Abhisar.

Use GLC-T to connect ucs 6120 and 2960s (RJ45),.have SFP validation failed problem

hi,every .
i use GLC-T to connect ucs 6120 and cisco2960s (RJ45),.have sfp validation failed problem.
I have done speed to 1G then I am getting error " link not connected" even I have connected the nnetwork cable..

UCS6120-A(nxos)# show interface e1/7
Ethernet1/7 is down (SFP validation failed)
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 0005.73d2.934e (bia 0005.73d2.934e)
Description: U: Uplink
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is trunk
auto-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
Rate mode is dedicated
Switchport monitor is off
EtherType is 0x8100
Last link flapped never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
30 seconds input rate 0 bits c, 0 bytes c, 0 packets c
30 seconds output rate 0 bits c, 0 bytes c, 0 packets c
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
input rate 0 bps, 0 pps; output rate 0 bps, 0 pps
RX
0 unicast packets 0 multicast packets 0 broadcast packets
0 input packets 0 bytes
--More--

Which CISCO switch supports SFP, SFP+ and 10G ethernet ports

I would like to have information about a CISCO switch which can support fiber ports SFP(1g) and SFP+(10g) and copper 1g and 10g ethernet ports. And will it also software upgradable to support L3 protocols ?

You can choose from the Cisco 3560-E, 4900, 4500, and 6500 series switches. That's in order of capability (and cost!), from least to greatest.
The 3560-E and 4900 series are fixed chassis systems (the 4900M is semi-modular) while the 4500 and 6500 series are completely modular - buy the chassis and populate it according to your requirements.
In addition to the references cited above, also refer to the Cisco Products Quick Reference Guide (CPQRG), available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/qrg/index.html
Hope this helps. Please rate this post if it does.

Compatibility Cisco 3750 and GBIC 1000Base-ZX/SFP

Hello,
I have some problems to use a GBIC 1000Base-ZX on a cisco 3750.
With some research , i have find these thing :
The Catalyst 3750 models support these Cisco SFP options:
1000BASE-LX
1000BASE-SX
1000BASE-T
1000Base-ZX didn't appear.
What do you think of such thing.
Thanks for help

The 1000BASE-ZX SFP (Cisco product number GLC-ZX-SM=) is supported on the Catalyst 3750:
Cisco Optical SFP Transceiver Compatibility Matrix
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps5000/products_device_support_table09186a0080212cba.html
List price in the US is the same as for the 1000BASE-ZX GBIC (Cisco product number WS-G5487=)
It's possible that the information you have found has not been updated yet. I believe the ZX SFPs were among the last ones to become available. The Release Notes in the link below are the first ones to mention this SFP, they refer to it as "new hardware" (versus the SX and LX SFPs):
Release Notes for the Catalyst 3750 Switch Cisco IOS Release 12.1(14)EA1 July 2003
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3750/12114ea1/ol421501.htm
Hope this helps.

URGENT: MPLS P/ PE support on 7600/Sup720-BXL and 3750 Metro switch

I'm need to design a MPLS network for a Cable Operator.
They will start small with some Cisco CMTS doing MPLS-PE and needing only two devices to aggregate these PE and delivering Services (Internet connection, VoD, ...) , so they will need to work has P/PE.
For that I want to know if it's possible to:
1 - Use 3750 Metro and 7600/Sup720-BXL as P and PE
2 - Who many customers (L2VPN/VLANs and/or L3VPN/VRF) can they support?
Searching in CCO I found these values/features but, need URGENT to check:
1 - sup720-bxl supports P and PE but 3750 only PE?
2 - 3750 supports 1024 VLANs and 8,192 MPLS labels but no values on L3VPN/VRF?
SUP720 supports more than 1000 VRF?
Really need urgent HELP on this design/capabilities for these two devices.
Thanks in advance,
MP
Network Consultant - CCIE

before you even get anywhere close to the numbers of L2/L3 on a 7200 I would seriously consider asking what throughput you can get through a 7200 with MPLS, QOS, L3vpns and L2vpns configured. I have done this testing already but dont think it is appropriate to quote the figures publically.

Cisco 4503 "1000BaseLH" SFP light is not coming ---- Urgent

Dear Team,
I have Cisco 4503 and I have inserted 1000BaseLH and light is not coming up but for 1000BaseSX its fine.
Please suggest.
CORE#show int GigabitEthernet1/18
GigabitEthernet1/18 is down, line protocol is down (notconnect)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet Port, address is 001e.4aa6.b891 (bia 001e.4aa6.b891)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, Auto-speed, link type is auto, media type is 1000BaseLH
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts (0 multicast)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
CORE#show inventory
NAME: "GigabitEthernet1/18", DESCR: "1000BaseLH"
PID: TRF5735AALB202 , VID: A1 , SN: OPA11241478
Thank You,
Abhisar.

Dear Reza,
we connected cable and it came up. The conclusion is single m9de sfps does not show light where multimode sfp shows light when sfp is connected on switch port.
Thank you for your suggesion.
Thank You,
Abhisar.

Cisco ASR1001-X SFP-10G-SR: unable to bring 10G port up

Dear colleagues,
I have connected a Cisco ASR1001-X 10G port to a 10G port on the Cisco 7606-S. The SFP on my ASR1001-X is SFP-10G-SR and the SFP on the 7606-S is XENPAK-10GB-LX4. I am using an MMF fibre patching. I am unable to bring the port up. I have a temp license for the ASR 10G port. Is that sufficient to bring the port up?
I have tried connecting the SFP-10G-SR to a XFP-10G-MM-SR on another ASR but this did not work either. I am able to connect the XFP-10G-MM-SR to one another and also the SFP-10G-SR to one another. So there appears to be an issue when I mix the SFPs.
Can any one help please?

The SFP on my ASR1001-X is SFP-10G-SR and the SFP on the 7606-S is XENPAK-10GB-LX4. I am using an MMF fibre patching.
The two fibre optic modules are on different wavelengths so the link won't come up.

Cisco 10Gb WDM SFP+

Hello All!
I need to migrate 2 Data Center connection from 2x1Gb to 2x10Gb. I have only 2 dark SM fiber available. Now I have 2 pair of GLC-BX10-U/GLC-BX10-D WDM SFP. Every pair use one fiber. Now I'm searching for Cisco certified SFP+ 10GB WDM, to get one 10Gb over one fiber. But now have find only some compatible like SNR-SFP+W37-20. Who know have cisco any plan to product 10Gb WDM SFP+ and is it danger us to use other vendor SPF?
Thank you for the help!

I just noticed that Cisco has a 1310nm/1550nm solution: Part Number WDM-1300-1550-S=. It is outlined on the following page.
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/ps6575/product_data_sheet0900aecd8029d01b_ps708_Products_Data_Sheet.html
I have not seen anything announced by Cisco for the release of a 10G bi-directional SFP+.
How far apart are the data centers?
You might consider using a pair of third-party WDM filters on each fiber. The WDM filter creates two virtual fibers out of one fiber. At one end of the link, you install a 1310nm SFP+ transceiver in your equipment and the other end you install a 1550nm SFP+ transceiver in your equipment. This is functionally similar to what is integrated into the 1G single fiber SFP solution.
There are other solutions (DWDM), but the price tag increases significantly (but will scale in bandwidth in the future without adding fibers).
Just my 2 cents.

Cisco 3750 Switch SFP Module

Hi all,
I have one 3750 switch( ME-C3750-24TE )with IOS 12.2(25)EY4,
Now I have two SFp Module GLC-SX-MM and i have inserted in four ports of Switch
But nowhere I found it detected via "Sh inventory"
Moreover I have also tried with loop cable (LCPC-FCPC-ATTENTUATOR-FCPC-LCPC)bUT NOT GETTING lED ON ANY PORT
Pl. Guide
I am attaching sh-tech for reference

Hi,
when inserted the SFP module in one port take a look at the output of "show interface gigabitethernetX/Y" watch for a line (I think it is line 5) including the word "media", there should be a short description of the SFP. Also look at the first line of "show interface gigabitethernetX/Y" it could be that the SFP doesn't work in the switch (maybe because it is a none cisco one) then there would be something like "err-disabled". And if you have logging enabled on the switch (e.g. logging buffered 8192 debugging) then there should be an error message also.
The command "show idprom interface gigabitethernetX/Y" shows information about the SFP module in slotX/Y.
Depending on the "err-disable" configuration of the switch ("show err-disable detect" and "show err-disable recovery") a looped interface maybe put in an 'err-disabled' state, see "show interface ..." or "show logging"
HTH
regards
Mark

CISCO MDS 9124 SFP Compatibility

We recently received a number of spare SFPs in case of failure of the installed items. After having installed one of these SFPs in our test bed we receive the following notification:
%PORT-5-IF_DOWN_FCOT_VENDOR_NOT_SUPPORTED: %$VSAN 1%$ Interface fc1/1 is down (Error disabled - FCOT vendor not supported)
On checking the online documentation we located the following:
Error Message ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_FCOT_VENDOR_NOT_SUPPORTED: Interface [chars] is down (Error disabled - Fcot vendor not supported).
Explanation The inserted small form-factor pluggable (SFP) device is not supported.
Recommended Action Contact customer support for a list of authorized SFP vendors.
Introduced Cisco MDS SAN-OS Release 1.2(2a).
Does anyone know of any workarounds for this? Also does anyone know where we may locate a defnitive list of supported vendors [other than waiting on results from customer support].
Thanks

Hi Daniel,
As far as I know, only Cisco SFPs are supported.
Here is a link to the information on what SFPs are supported and where:
Cisco MDS 9000 Family Pluggable Transceivers Data Sheet
Best regards,
Jim

Cisco Nexus 5596UP SFP Problem

Hi All,
We are using Cisco Nexus 5596UP on DC.
we want to use 1g-mm gbic for fiber connection, but do not link up
sh int 1/29 trans det
    transceiver is present
    type is 1000base-SX
    name is CISCO-FINISAR
    part number is FTRJ-8519-7D-CSC
    revision is --
    serial number is FNS0841A2RK
    nominal bitrate is 1200 MBit/sec
    Link length supported for 50/125um fiber is 550 m
    Link length supported for 62.5/125um fiber is 300 m
    cisco id is --
    cisco extended id number is 4
   Transceiver calibration is invalid
sh int eth 1/29
Ethernet1/29 is down (Link not connected)
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 0005.73e8.bea4 (bia 0005.73e8.bea4)
Description: Zer_fiber
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 0/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is access
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
Rate mode is dedicated
Switchport monitor is off
EtherType is 0x8100
Last link flapped never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 07:11:12
30 seconds input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec
30 seconds output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
    input rate 0 bps, 0 pps; output rate 0 bps, 0 pps
RX
    0 unicast packets 928 multicast packets 0 broadcast packets
    928 input packets 6764 bytes
    0 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression bytes
    0 giants 928 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun   0 underrun
    0 watchdog 0 if down drop
    0 input with dribble 0 input discard
    0 Rx pause
TX
    0 unicast packets 0 multicast packets 0 broadcast packets
    0 output packets 0 bytes
    0 jumbo packets
    0 output errors 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision
    0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble
    0 Tx pause
0 interface resets

Hi,
We are using 1000Base-SX SFP in N7K with release 6.0.2,
But, we can't use 1000Base-SX in 5596UP with release 5.0(3)N2(2b)
1000Base-SX writes are supported on the web page you suggested. However, in accordance with the following configuration does not work.
sh run int eth1/29
interface Ethernet1/29
switchport access vlan 645
speed 1000
duplex full
sh int status | inc 1/29
Port          Name               Status    Vlan      Duplex Speed   Type
Eth1/29       ---          notconnec 645       full    1000    1/10g
sh int eth 1/29
Ethernet1/29 is down (Link not connected) - But link connected...
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 0005.73e8.bea4 (bia 0005.73e8.bea4)
Description: ---
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 0/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is access
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
sh int eth 1/29 transceiver details
Ethernet1/29
    transceiver is present
    type is 1000base-SX
    name is CISCO-FINISAR
    part number is FTRJ-8519-7D-CSC
    revision is --
    serial number is FNS0841A2RK
    nominal bitrate is 1200 MBit/sec
    Link length supported for 50/125um fiber is 550 m
    Link length supported for 62.5/125um fiber is 300 m
    cisco id is --
    cisco extended id number is 4
   Transceiver calibration is invalid
thank you for your interest
Regards,
Yücel

Nvidia GeoForce Go 7600 graphics driver and IQ770 with Windows Vista Home Premium 32 bit edition

I have been having problems with my screen for several months now: every so often, for no apparent reason, it loses some of the pixels. I can still read the items on the screen, but the resolution is trashed. It happens intermittently and then goes back to normal. I have tried uninstalling the graphics driver and letting the computer go find it on a reboot. This does not work. I have also tried installing the original graphics driver. This does not work either.
If I look in the "Problem Reports" area in Control Panel, there is a graphics related error:
Error Message: STOP 0x000000EA THREAD_STUCK_IN_DEVICE_DRIVER (Q293078) The resolution listed is to reinstall the device driver (which I've tried dozens of times without success) or to change the computer's performance settings, which also does nothing. I still get the occasional loss of screen clarity which returns to normal all by itself.
Is anyone else seeing this problem? Does anyone have a resolution?
I have tried the latest graphics driver available on the hp website, from 8-2008 as well as the originally installed version from January 2007. The version of Windows is Vista Home Premium 32 bit edition, Service Pack 1.
If I completely uninstall the graphics driver, and do not reload any, the screen performance is fine, but then there are other problems, such as graphics acceleration.
Thanks for your help.

For the IQ700 series
If you're running Windows Vista SP2, there is a patch for USB patch for NVIDIA chipsets
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/975163/
If you're running Windows 7, install this patch
http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Lockups-Freezes-Hangs/Driver-update-for-Win7-USB-issue-on-nVidia-chipse...
And only use the driver from the system manufacturer's website or Windows Update. Do not use the latest drivers from NVIDIA's website for the IQ700 series

CISCO CATALYST 3560 SFP INTERCONNECT CABLE

What is the advantage of using this SFP cable over a 1000BaseT GBIC and daisy chaining the switches together?
Just curious???
Thanks!

The advantage comes down to cost. Whether you can realize this advantage depends on the distance between the two Catalyst 3560 switches.
If the distance is less than or equal to 50cm, then one SFP Interconnect Cable (CAB-SFP-50CM=) at US$250 is a much less expensive way to connect the two switches than two 1000BASE-T SFP (GLC-T=) at US$395 each = US$790 plus a Cat5 or better UTP Gigabit Ethernet crossover cable.
If the distance is greater than 50cm but less than or equal to 100m, then the 1000BASE-T SFPs are your least expensive option. The alternative is MM or SM fiber.
If you have to connect a Catalyst 3560 SFP interface to another Catalyst switch that takes GBICs, then the SFP Interconnect Cable is not even an option. From 0 to 100m, 1000BASE-T SFP and GBIC (WS-G5483=) would be your least expensive way to go.
If there's any chance you will be redeploying these switches somewhere else in the future, you may want to put the 1000BASE-T SFPs in now. That way you'll already have them when you need them later.

Cisco 7600-es20-ge3c and Cisco ws-x6724-sfp

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for