Cisco 7609-RG gigabit

Hi
is CLNS protocol working on RG ports? or olny works on fiberoptic giga ports?
Regards
Ali

Each VC supports the Multiprotocol (AppleTalk, CLNS, DECnet, IP, IPX, VINES, XNS, and so forth). So every port can work with CLNS.

Similar Messages

Cisco 7609 - optical gigabit interface

Hi all,
I have a strange problem with the optical gigabit interface of a Cisco
switch 7609. This is the problem:
I have two 7609 cisco switch (A and B) cross connect with a optical
fiber.
All port of both switches are configured as followed:
switchport
switchport mode acces
shutdown
no cdp enable
no ip address
end
With the same optical fiber cable i have connect two ports of the switches and I brough up the interface.
I got the following result if i run 'show ip interface brief' on the switches:
SW A - SW B
port 1 - port 1 --> link down protocol down
port 2 - port 1 --> link up protocol up
port 1 - port 2 --> link up protocol up
port 2 - port 2 --> link up protocol up
Why if i connect port 1 on both switches the link don't brought up?
Have anyone some idea for the possible cause of the problem?
Thank you
BR
\Sergio

Try:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6902/products_implementation_design_guide_chapter09186a008062f863.html

Cisco 7609 router received higher traffic than upstream provider router is sending

Hi all,
I have a Cisco 7609 router that connects to our upstream provider router using 3rd party DWDM Fiber backhaul provider.
The upstream provider router is a Juniper router that had capped our port speed to 1.1Gbps, the backhaul provider didn't capped our port speed and the maximum speed is 2Gbps since it's a 2x1Gbps port channel interface.
I have noticed that our 7609 router able to receive traffic that exceeds 1.1Gbps, and the highest traffic able to received is 1.3Gbps and more.
I have crossed checked the MRTG graph provided by our upstream provider as well as our PRTG graph and indeed we are receiving higher bandwidth than our upstream provider is sending.
I'd like to know if anyone know how it is possible to receive traffic that is higher than what the neighbor router is sending?
Regards

Hi at all,
We found a solution for this Problem !!
We always and always got this error:
%PQUICC-1-LOSTCARR: Unit 0, lost carrier. Transceiver problem?
The problem was the cable! The following pin-out is required:
                                        1 ----- 1
                                        2 ----- 2
                                        3 ----- 6
                                        4 ----- 5
                                        5 ----- 4
                                        6 ----- 3
                                        7 ----- 7
                                        8 ----- 8
We used this and the fault has disappeared!!
The only problem that still exists:
After the first connection the router must be rebooted because otherwise no more additional session is established.
Thanks for all answers.
Regards,
Mario

Cisco 7609-S/ME3600X port shaping

Hello everyone
I am using the folloing configuration on Cisco ME36000X for port shaping
policy-map TEST_OUT_10MB
class class-default
shape average 10000000
policy-map TEST_IN_10MB
class class-default
police 10000000
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
service instance 101 ethernet
encapsulation untagged
service-policy input TEST_IN_10MB
service-policy output TEST_OUT_10MB
bridge-domain 101
interface Vlan101
bandwidth 10000
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
I have applyed also the same port shaping on an Cisco 7609-S with an 7600-ES+20G3CXL
policy-map TEST_10MB
class class-default
police 10000000
   shape average 10000000
interface GigabitEthernet1/11
bandwidth 10000
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
load-interval 30
service-policy input TEST_10MB
service-policy output TEST_10MB
When i am downloading a file and capturing the traffic with wireshark there is significant difference on Cisco 7609-S graph with that one on Cisco ME3600X. Both have the same internet connection.
Is there any way to fine tune Cisco ME3600X to have the same behavior like Cisco 7609-S?
Regards
Antonis.

I have not that graph so I am just guessing that you are noticing the difference between policing and shaping. It seems to me you are applying these techniques on each platform on a different way. Try to shape/police in the same order or only to shape.
Hope to help
Alessio
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Ethernet cfm: question on RDI allarm cisco 7609

Hi all,
I have ethernet cfm configured on two Cisco 7609s and two UP MEPs configured under xconnect PW MPLS on the same domain, level and service MA so they became CFM peers.
I notice that after removing and re-configuring olny one UP MEP under xconnect PW, the Cisco 7609 send a SYSLOG message indicating a RDI defect alarm and the show ethernet cfm errors showed RDI defect too.
Aftert 18 seconds this alarm is cleared and the show ethernet cfm errors is empty.
I don't undestand this behaviour..why the Cisco send the RDI alarm in this situation?

Have you opened a TAC case for it ?
Can you share output of:
show module 1

Cisco 7609 router

I have a cisco 7609 router it Communication Media Module WS-SVC-CMM card,when i do (show module) im seeing the card there but when i want to configure the card like i type (card type the iso is not recognising it but i downloaded the latest version of the IOS and upgrade it but stiil,can any one help.

try 12.2 SB series.
regards
shivlu jain

Issue in Sub-interface traffic on cisco 7609-s router

Hello please support,
I configured sub-interfaces and it is working properly, but some time sub-interface show traffic more then physical interface .
Like
int gi 3/32 0.13 Mbps 12:00 PM
int gi 3/32.11 855 Mbps 12:00 PM
as per my knowledge physical interface have cumulative traffic of all sub-interfaces.
interface GigabitEthernet3/32
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet3/32.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 172.20.128.77 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
ip ospf bfd
bfd interval 50 min_rx 50 multiplier 5
no bfd echo
no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet3/32.11
description interlink MPLS
encapsulation dot1Q 11
ip address 172.20.129.73 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
mpls ip
mpls label protocol ldp
Regards,
Damodar Nagar

I have not that graph so I am just guessing that you are noticing the difference between policing and shaping. It seems to me you are applying these techniques on each platform on a different way. Try to shape/police in the same order or only to shape.
Hope to help
Alessio
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Which Module to teminate STM1 trunk in cisco 7609

Hi,
WHich interface or controller could we use to terminate STM1 trunk and chanalizing it ti different interfaces.

You can try using the Cisco 7600 series Enhanced Flex WAN module. This will support the STM1 trunk. For more information on this module read the following document. Under Supported Port adapters you will find STM1 specified.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_data_sheet09186a00801df1d9.html

Cisco 7609 showing errors when saving config

Router#wr
Building configuration...
% Cannot communicate boot variable to standby
% Cannot communicate boot variable to standby
% Cannot communicate boot variable to standby
% Cannot communicate boot variable to standby[OK]
This is running on code 122-33.SRB1.
Any suggestions? Have we hit a bug?

It could be. Could you please share
sh ver
sh mod
sh boot
sh redundancy
sh log
It seems you may need to reset the standby sup to clear this condition. But please share the above to check.
Thanks,
Madhu.

Multilink issue on Cisco 7609

Hi,
We tried to create 2 x Multilinks between OSR's, but due to some issues only 1 Multilink comes up and the other was failing during negotiatiation. We need to create 2 multilinks between two sites,
Need support that why we are unable to create more than 1 multilink.

It would be easier to identify the issue if you provide details of how it was configured and any error messages that might have been issued.
HTH
Rick

Cisco SFP Module 1000BASE-ZX

Sir,
I want Cisco SFP Module 1000BASE-ZX for connecting fiber in cisco 7609 router.
.What may be its approximate price.Is there any other solution for connecting gigabit fiber in cisco 7609 router.
Regards
Senthil

This is the output from sh interface:
GigabitEthernet0/1 is down, line protocol is down (notconnect)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is f029.2950.8119 (bia f029.2950.8119)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not set
Auto-duplex, Auto-speed, link type is auto, media type is 1000BaseLX SFP
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
     0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 0 broadcasts (0 multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
    0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 0 pause input
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output
As you can see the switch detects SFP as 1000BaseLX SFP, however it is 100Base FX

Gigabit Performance on Penryn MBP -- can't go beyond 230 MBit/s

I've been seeing some pretty poor gigabit throughput with my MacBook Pro 15", about 220-230 Mbit/s. Here are the things I've ruled out:
- swapped cables several times, including Cat 6 cabling fresh from the package
- Tried several switches: D-Link DGS-2208, Netgear 8 port desktop switch and an enterprise grade Cisco 48 port Gigabit switch
- Several other hosts (Ubuntu, CentOS, WinXP)
- Different test tools: netio and a web server with curl piped into /dev/null
- Made sure I'm not CPU bound. When I run the test tools locally, I get well north of 1,000 MBit/s (with the curl test, I got > 5,000)
I've ruled out just about any environmental parameters, and the throughput is pretty much pinned at 220-230 Mbit/s. Between the several target hosts, I was able to get 800-900 MBit/s.
At this point, am I looking at sucky hardware? Software issue? Driver? I'm running Leopard with all the latest updates...

Yes, you can set the MTU to 9000. But that hasn't been set on any of the other hosts and shouldn't have such a dramatic impact.

Cisco 7600 ES Plus Intelligent Services Gateway License-For old and new 7600-ES+20G3CXL= line card

Hi everyone
i had an one thing, that i don't understand clearly.
We had Cisco 7609-S witth 7600-ES+20G3CXL line card and Intelligent Services Gateway License (76-ES+ISG-LIC)
Now the Line card had hardware problem, and my manager not alllow me to buy services, He want to by the brandnew one.
I read some informations from cisco website " The license is purchased per chassis in increments of 8000 subscribers requiring BNG features with 8 MPLS VPNs per license".
But i don't know clearly that can we use the existing 76-ES+ISG-LIC with the New Line card? or I must buy the both of things
Anybody can support me?
Thanks
Phai La Quy

Hi everyone
i had an one thing, that i don't understand clearly.
We had Cisco 7609-S witth 7600-ES+20G3CXL line card and Intelligent Services Gateway License (76-ES+ISG-LIC)
Now the Line card had hardware problem, and my manager not alllow me to buy services, He want to by the brandnew one.
I read some informations from cisco website " The license is purchased per chassis in increments of 8000 subscribers requiring BNG features with 8 MPLS VPNs per license".
But i don't know clearly that can we use the existing 76-ES+ISG-LIC with the New Line card? or I must buy the both of things
Anybody can support me?
Thanks
Phai La Quy

Cisco IGESM Configuration

Guys,
Can the IBM BladeCenter chassis be used to connect the blade servers to different subnets (different physical segments also)?? The specific config that I have is using the Cisco IGESM switches.
Thanks guys.

Hello,
not sure if this is what you are asking, but I think you need an external router for that, that is, you can configure the ports IGESM ports for different VLANs, but in order to route between the VLANs, you need a routing device.
Check the ´Cisco Systems Intelligent Gigabit Ethernet Switch Modules Software Configuration Guide´ in the link below, and consult the chapter ´Configuring Interface Characteristics´ (Figure 7-1):
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/products/ps6294/c1067/ccmigration_09186a00805b60d4.pdf
Regards,
GP

CWDM-Cisco....does it synchronise?????

I have a cisco 7609 router at our larger POPs on which terminates a CWDM ring. To this 7609, are connected 7606s at our smaller POPs again through a CWDM ring of ADVA FSP 2000. The CWDM device is from ADVA optical networking known as FSP 2000. These CWDM devices are in Ring fashion and are located in every other smaller POPs on which 7606 routers are connected. I have a WS 6724 card in 7609 router on which CWDM ring terminates at larger POP. Now the problem here is that some of the ports on this card are not getting activated and are DOWN. Whereas the status of ports on 7606 (GE-WAN ports on OSM card) at my smaller POPs is UP. But I'm not able to reach from 7606 at my smaller POP to 7609 at my Larger POP. ADVA says that there's no problem with their device.Could someone please let me know the reason behind this?
To be very precise and clear, all these POPS were running well earlier.
Thanks,
NISHA

Hi
i would recommend u to go thru this testing procedure...
it may help u out to fix ur probs...
1. Check that the local 2TCM interface is administrative "up" on either locations
2. Check that the local 2TCM interface speed is set to "1250" on either location
3. Check that each local receiver detects a valid signal from CISCO - optical readings shall fall in the range between -16 dBm to -3 dBm
4. If L/R in location A is turned on green, the corresponding L/T on location B becomes active, so L/T turns green - check output power rigth after the L/T and do the same measurement just in front of the CISCO GBIC receiver to include the patch cord.
5. If L/R in location B is turned on green, the corresponding L/T on location A becomes active, so L/T turns green - check output power rigth after the L/T and do the same measurement just in front of the CISCO GBIC receiver to include the patch cord.
6. If step 1 to 5 answers is "yes" and measured values fully inline with our specification but the CISCO link still cannot be established, swap to the second port of the 2TCM. Redo steps 1-5 and confirm behaviour on second port of the 2TCM card pair.
7. If still no communication between the CISCOs, place a loop cable with 20dB attenuation between R/T and R/R of the 2TCM in location A and check if the CISCO can "see" it`s own signal.
8. Place a loop cable with 20dB attenuation between R/T and R/R of the 2TCM in location B and check if the CISCO can "see" it`s own signal.
regds

Cisco 7609-RG gigabit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for