Cisco ASR 1006 and WAAS

Hi,
Is there any built-in WAAS and NME features or services in Cisco ASR 1006? Or is there any WAAS or NME module that can be installed in Cisco ASR 1006? I found that for Cisco ISR 1900, 2900, and 3900, WAAS and NME services can be enabled by installing SRE and NME module. But can't find any information for Cisco ASR 1006.
Really appreciate your help.
Thanks

Hi Marvin
There is no option for this.
on the 4510 the only options under the interface are
speed nonegotiate or no speed nonegotiate (for auto)
Similarly on the ASR no negotiation auto or negotiation auto. setting each device to auto/manual or manual/auto has no effect on the ASR port - its still down
Cheers

Similar Messages

Maximum cos1 (voice traffic) supported by Cisco ASR 1006 router

Dear Team,
Please confirm the maximum cos 1 traffic supported by cisco ASR 1006 router.

Yes, it would. If you are planning on terminating a single site on this router I would spread over multiple routers for redundancy.
Table 6 explains number of ports and channels providing you have the DSPs:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/routers/2800-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/product_data_sheet0900aecd8057f2e0.pdf

Cisco ASR 1006 Cube license

Dears,
i have cisco asr router 1006 and i need to check the license cube license.
i tried show license but it doesnt accept the command.
Please advise how to check the cube license and its ersial number.
BR,
Haytham

Have you tried...
show facility-alarm status
to identify what the critical alarm is and then fix.
You may be able to also use
clear facility-alarm
However, most likely it could be some issue such as failed power supply, etc that will not clear.

Ask the Experts: Understanding Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers Platform Architecture and Packet Forwarding Troubleshooting

With Xander Thuijs
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn how to Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers with Cisco expert Xander Thuijs. The Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers product family offers a significant added value compared to the prior generations of carrier Ethernet routing offerings. The Cisco ASR 9000 Series is an operationally simple, future-optimized platform using next-generation hardware and software. The ASR 9000 platform family is composed of the Cisco ASR 9010 Router, the Cisco ASR 9006 Router, the Cisco ASR 9922 Router, Cisco ASR 9001 Router and the Cisco ASR 9000v Router.
This is a continuation of the live Webcast.
Xander Thuijs is a principal engineer for the Cisco ASR 9000 Series and Cisco IOS-XR product family at Cisco. He is an expert and advisor in many technology areas, including IP routing, WAN, WAN switching, MPLS, multicast, BNG, ISDN, VoIP, Carrier Ethernet, System Architecture, network design and many others. He has more than 20 years of industry experience in carrier Ethernet, carrier routing, and network access technologies. Xander holds a dual CCIE certification (number 6775) in service provider and voice technologies. He has a master of science degree in electrical engineering from Hogeschool van University in Amsterdam.
Remember to use the rating system to let Xander know if you have received an adequate response.
Xander might not be able to answer each question because of the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Service Providers community XR OS And Platforms shortly after the event. This event lasts through Friday, May 24, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.
Webcast related links:
Slides
Webcast Video Recording
FAQ

Is there a Cisco lab available for ASR 9000
we have "XR4U" stations coming available soon when XR 511 comes alive. The plan is for a downloadable play image like that. In the interim we have 2 demo systems available, and they can be booked via your account manager representative.
How will MOD160 perform with multiple 9000NVS?
very well. the mod 160 has 4 NPU's, 2 per bay. So if you have a 4x10 MPA to serve a satellite, you effectively have a single NPU per 20 1Gigs from the satellite. The pps performance will be stellar. However it might be price technically more ideal to connect satellite with a 36x10. Since the MOD-x has native MPA's with 1G also.
2. Is there a shortcut for a Bundle-EthernetX interface, such as port-channel interface (poX), in Cisco IOS® ?.
usability enhancement is there, we are trying to push this into a new reasonable release. follow CSCuh04526
3. What is the revolutions per minute (RPM) on these hard disk drives (HDDs) compared to the solid state drives (SDDs)? Will the spinning drives be slow?
depends on the type we had avaialble at time of production, you will see different sizes and disks on the RSP2. the rpm of the HD is not so much an issue as much as the buffered writing we used to do in XR. This is fixed up with XR43 where the disk writing performance is much better. the HD/SDD is used for logging storage only (and maybe your pictures) but other then that we're not that concerned with write perf of the HD.
regards
xander

Command execution get very slow when AAA Authorization enable on ASR 1006

Without Authorization , I am able work smoothly with just click on ASR ...., But Once I enable Authorization it takes many secs to move to other command exampe ( If i hit config t or int gi1/0/1 , it take time to move to next command level) ...
These Authorization issue I am facing only on ASR and for Other Cisco Switches and Router its working fine wiith just a click.
Did any one face such issue , and how it is fix ...
See the Show version for ASR
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software (PPC_LINUX_IOSD-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.1(2)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 24-Mar-11 23:32 by mcpre
Cisco IOS-XE software, Copyright (c) 2005-2011 by cisco Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved. Certain components of Cisco IOS-XE software are
licensed under the GNU General Public License ("GPL") Version 2.0. The
software code licensed under GPL Version 2.0 is free software that comes
with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You can redistribute and/or modify such
GPL code under the terms of GPL Version 2.0. For more details, see the
documentation or "License Notice" file accompanying the IOS-XE software,
or the applicable URL provided on the flyer accompanying the IOS-XE
software.
ROM: IOS-XE ROMMON
NOITDCRTRCORP01 uptime is 10 weeks, 6 days, 1 hour, 16 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 10 weeks, 6 days, 1 hour, 19 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System restarted at 17:47:32 IST Thu Oct 4 2012
System image file is "bootflash:/asr1000rp1-advipservicesk9.03.03.00.S.151-2.S.bin"
Last reload reason: EHSA standby down
AAA Commands on ASR 1006
aaa new-model
aaa group server tacacs+ tacgroup
server 10.48.128.10
server 10.72.160.10
ip vrf forwarding Mgmt-intf
ip tacacs source-interface GigabitEthernet0
aaa authentication login default group tacgroup local
aaa authentication enable default group tacgroup enable
aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacgroup
aaa accounting commands 1 default start-stop group tacgroup
aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group tacgroup
aaa accounting connection default start-stop group tacgroup
aaa accounting system default start-stop group tacgroup
aaa authorization commands 0 default group tacgroup none
aaa authorization commands 1 default group tacgroup none
aaa authorization commands 15 default group tacgroup none
aaa session-id common
tacacs-server host 10.48.128.10 key 7 13351601181B0B382F04796166
tacacs-server key 7 053B071C325B411B1D25464058

I think your issue maybe related to your tacacs server. If you re-order the two servers (typically a 5 second timer before failover occurs) and see if that improves your performance:
You can try to debug the issue by referring to the command reference guide....i.e. debug tacacs...you can also try to telnet to both ip address to port 49 to see if the connection opens, in order to rule out issues where a firewall or routing to one of the tacacs servers is failing. I also noticed you have the shared secret and tacacs server defined for one of the servers, is the sam present for the other server that is in the server group?
server 10.48.128.10
server 10.72.160.10
to
server 10.72.160.10
server 10.48.128.10
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

ASR 1006 vs ASR 9001

Hi All:
I would appreciate if someone can share their lifetime experience and suggest me to finalize the right product between ASR 1006 or ASR 9001.
Requirements:
- We need full internet feed with IPv4 and IPv6.
-10 G & STM-16 interfaces for connectivity.
- 10 Gbps traffic need to be handled by the box.
- MPLS L3/L2 VPN's
I personally after going through IOS-XR feature, prefer this.
Need some expert thoughts in the light of real world experience.
Regards,

Hi Sayed,
ASR 9001 does not support STM-16 interfaces. It is purely 1 GE/10 GE platform.
If you are looking for an XR platform that supports STM-16 interfaces, you need to go with the 9006 (or 9904) , RSP-440, SIP-700 and POS SPA (for STM) and Typhoon 10GE linecard. (with Trident you might face an issue for the number of learned prefixes depending on the scale profile you choose: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/routers/asr-9000-series-aggregation-services-routers/116999-problem-line-card-00.html)
If you decide to go with the ASR 1006, make sure you choose dual RP2 ( with 16GB mem), ESP-100 (or ESP-200) and SIP40. This should eliminate the TCAM exhaustion issue, if you decide to do NAT and ACL.; and guarantee and route-scale that might occur. (for the ASR 1000, I would recommend upgrading all of the memories)
HTH,
Michel.

Traffic policing question on Cisco ASR 1001

Hi Experts,
I have a request to setup aggregated traffic policing on a Cisco ASR 1001 router for multiple networks within a router.
Lets say I have a router with several subinterfaces:
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description WAN
ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.70
description Lan_1
encapsulation dot1Q 70
ip address 192.168.55.1 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.80
description LAN_2
encapsulation dot1Q 80
ip address 192.168.56.1 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.90
description Servers
encapsulation dot1Q 90
ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0
I have a WAN link 100Mbit/s and I need to police traffic, so that I have 30Mbit/s for servers (GigabitEthernet0/1.90) and the rest 70Mbit I want to share between Interface Lan_1 and LAN_2. The Idea is that I need 70Mbit/s equally shared between two interfaces, so that I have fair policing on both iunterfaces. What is the best way to achieve this?
Many Thanks

Hello
The below configuration is a possible option, Its provides policing inbound from the clients interfaces and LLQ priority queung on the wan interface for the servers and shaping values from LAN1 & 2 traffic is set to 35MB.each.
Notice nothing is defined for the default class, however i am on the understanding this is given by default 1% of Hqos implementations.
Maybe others on here could review to verify any problems with this post and share their thoughts?
ip access-list extended SRVS_acl
permit ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
ip access-list extended LAN1_acl
permit ip 192.168.55.0 0.0.0.255 any
ip access-list extended LAN2_acl
permit ip 192.168.56.0 0.0.0.255 any
class-map match-all SRVS_CM
match access-group name SRVS_acl
class-map match-all LAN_1_CM
match access-group name LAN1_acl
class-map match-all LAN_2_CM
match access-group name LAN2_acl
policy-map SRVS_PM
class SRVS_CM
    police 30720000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
policy-map LAN_2_PM
class LAN_2_CM
    police 35840000 conform-action transmit
policy-map LAN_1_PM
class LAN_1_CM
    police 35840000 conform-action transmit
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.70
service-policy input LAN_1_PM
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.90
service-policy input SRVS_PM
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.80
service-policy input LAN_2_PM
policy-map WAN_CHILD
class SRVS_CM
priority 30720
class LAN_1_CM
shape average 35840000
class LAN_2_CM
shape average 35840000
class class-default
fair-queue
policy-map WAN_PARENT
class class-default
shape average 102400000
service-policy WAN_CHILD
int GigabitEthernet0/2
bandwidth 102400
service-policy output WAN_PARENT
res
Paul

Can I rate-limit on the sub-interface in cisco asr 1013?

Hi,
I am looking for the command of rate-limit on a sub-interface in cisco asr 1013.
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.2(2)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
IOS XE Version: 03.06.00.S
Please let me know if it is possible in cisco asr 1013. If yes then what are the commands.
Zobair

The ASR no longer supports the rate-limit command, but it does support the same functionality in a QoS policy.
Please find a sample configuration -
ASR1004(config)#policy-map test
ASR1004(config-pmap)#class class-default
ASR1004(config-pmap-c)#shape average 10000
Applying for both ingress and egress : -
ASR1004(config)#int gig1/1/0
ASR1004(config-if)#service-policy output test
or
ASR1004(config-if)#service-policy input test

Cisco ASR Router Software Version 4.3.1 // PRTG Custom Sensor

Dears,
We are encountering problem in doing costume SNMP sensors in PRTG, whenever I create a customized sensor, the sensor goes up and down. We have faced this problem after updating the software of our Cisco ASR to 4.3.1. In older versions, it was working well. Is there a problem in Cisco ASR 4.3.1 SNMP with PRTG ? I would appreciate it if you can support in this case as we are in need of these customized sensors. We have gor all of them down because of the update
Regards,

Dear Alexander,
The standard sensors of PRTG are working well such as traffic sensors, ping etc, but the customized sensors are not working well in version 4.3.1. I always do a customized sensors for QoS, SLAs and others and they are working well in versions below 4.3.1.
Furthermore, I have tested those OIDs by using Paessler SNMP Tester and I have seen that the reading is not showing properly. For instance, I have a customized OID that shows the reading every 60s (as a minimum) only while in older versions of ASR software I can see the reading every 30s or below of that particular OID using the same version of PRTG!
Conclusion:
PRTG latest version + ASR 4.3.1 = Customized sesnors are not working well
PRTG latest version + ASR Older version = Customized sesnors are working well
Kind regards,

Monitoring Cisco ASR 1002 with IOS-XE in IPM 4.2

We are running LMS 3.2 with IPM 4.2 installed....and we are looking to do IPSLA monitoring on a couple of our Cisco ASR's with IOS-XE code installed.
I looked at the IPSLA feature mapping and it only talks about supported IOS code....do we need to upgrade our current IPM module to a current version?

Hi Konstantin,
Regarding "It is strange that these commands cleaned from sh run view.": this is normal for many default configuration commands.
Mine is a lab device so I cannot really comment on stability or provide you a recommendation based on that. However, I see that the download section from Cisco.com mentiones the following release as the recommended based on quality, stability and longevity:
asr1002x-universal.03.07.04a.S.152-4.S4a.SPA.bin
The best would be for you to check this with yor cisco Account Team or Advanced Services Team as normally they are the proper point of contacts for SW advisory.
Regards.

ASR 1006 shaping\policing on port-channel interfaces

Hello
I encountered a problem - ASR 1006 ignores shaping\policing configuration on a port-channel interfaces.
If I configure:
policy-map Shaping
class class-default
shape average 100000
interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode active
interface Port-channel1.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 1.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
service-policy output Shaping
With such configuration shaping doesn't work. But it works on ordinary tenGigabit interfaces...
I've tried several ios xe versions.. no changes
Are there any ristrictions with shaping on Port-channel interfaces?

Hi,
Traditional QoS will not work for etherchannels. Please read to find suitable config for your case.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_mqc/configuration/xe-3s/qos-mqc-xe-3s-book/qos-eth-int.html#GUID-6137A7B8-B2D1-4024-8AC9-E7EBEDD868C6

Does the mtu more 1500 bytes interface serial on cisco ASR 901?

Cisco ASR 901
Cisco A901-12C-FT-D
asr901-universalk9-mz.154-2.S.bin
(config-if)#mtu ?
<64-1500> MTU size in bytes
Нow to increase up to 1516 (for MPLS)

Hi Mick,
Can you try override keyword if it works in your case..
(config-if)#mpls mtu ?
<64-1500> MTU (bytes)
override Override mpls mtu maximum of interface mtu
SWP-ACC-SIX(config-if)#mpls mtu override ?
<1501-1580> MTU (bytes) ================> mtu is 1500 and mpls mtu can be configured upto 1580.
--Pls dont forget to rate helpful posts--
Regards,
Mohit

If i need a firewall,can ASR 1006 replace ASA 5580?

i check ASR 1006 config with ESP-40, the firewall permonce can reach 40G, ASA 5580 is 20G, can ASR 1006 replace ASA 5580, is there any function feature problem?
thank you!

Fly,
There is no official documentation that states which L3 device can replace an ASA, since they are completely different devices with some capabilities in common.
I would strongly recommend that you reach your account manager at Cisco for this one. They will be able to provide you accurate info.
Mike.

Cisco ASR - How to connect an OTV internal interface to a FabricPath domain

Scenario - migrate servers while maintaining their existing IP address from data centre 1 to data centre 2 with minimal downtime. Diagram attached.
I'm planning on using a Cisco ASR1001-X with AES license at DC1 and DC2 and configuring the routers with OTV to extend 10 x VLANs between the data centres. The join interface would connect directly to the WAN circuit NTU and the Internal Interface would connect to the switch and be configured as a service instance with 10 VLANs tagged using dot1q. The problem is that DC1 switch infrastructure is using Cisco Nexus 56xx configured with FabricPath. I can't find any information that suggests that i can patch the Cisco ASR router's internal interface directly into a FabricPath switchport or what the configuration would be.
Older OTV documentation refers to Nexus 7000 and OTV stating the following: "Because OTV encapsulation is done on M-series modules, OTV cannot read FabricPath packets. Because of this restriction, terminating FabricPath and reverting to Classical Ethernet where the OTV VDC resides is necessary."
Is this true for the Cisco ASR also? The only workaround i can think of is to install a cheap catalyst switch connected to the FabricPath domain and re-introduce spanning-tree at the edge but this seems backwards to me. Any help or suggestions appreciated? Thanks

Thanks Minh,
So it is possible to have switchports configured as routed, fabricpath and trunk/access in a fabricpath configuration? Do i need to add any spanning-tree pseudo or priority configuration?
Sample configs:
#ASR
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
no ip address
service instance 1 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 1
  bridge-domain 1
service instance 2 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 2
  bridge-domain 2
service instance 3 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 3
  bridge-domain 3
#Nexus 56xx
interface e1/5
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allow vlan 1,2,3

ASR 1006 - SIP proxy function available?

Hi there,
I can't find a clear answer to this question.
Can a ASR 1006 act as a SIP proxy? I've many SIP clients at near end, a big SIP server at far end and an ASR 1006 in the middle. Currently we have a SIP adjacency for each SIP client, passing it to SIP server. But this is poorly manageable as the number of clients increases. Can I set somehow the ASR just to work as SIP proxy?
Thanks in advance,
Fabio

This is not a new issue - can be seen here
388 -> 688 -> 6150 -> 6310 -> 6310i+1100+ E70-1(3.0633.09.04/crippled VoIP)

Cisco ASR 1006 and WAAS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for