Cisco Asterisk auto provisioning

Hi all,
I have setup asterisk pabx and the extension phones (SPA504g) have configured to auto provision by asterisk server.
The system was working fine, but today one extension phone got unregistered. I have reset the phone and test it again, it gives "Checking DNS". Other phones are working fine.
Do anyone has an idea about this issue?
Thanks,
Yasiru

Hi yasiru and welcome to the Cisco Home Community!
The SPA504G is handled by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.
For discussions about this product, please go here. https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business
cheers!
OnnagokorO

Similar Messages

WCS 5.0.56.2 Auto-Provisioning

In WCS 5.0 Cisco introduces Auto provisioning of WLCs.
Unfortunately there is not much documentation available, except for option explanation.
If i understood this right, Auto-Provisioning takes care of the initial setup of an out-of-the-box WLC. A very handy solution for wide spread WAN environment.
Has anyone here been working with this option, and can direct me into the right direction?
I try to auto-provide initial setup parameters from my WCS 5.0.56.2 to a WLC 4402 running 4.0.128.0 on a factory default configuration.
I hooked up the WLC with his glasfiber and his management port to our management vlan and also configured DHCP on one of the switches for our management vlan.
WCS is also hooked up to this management vlan.
I created filters, in WCS for either Serial No. and MAC-ADDRESS providing required parameters for initial setup.
Those filters remain idle, and the WLC doesn't recieve an IP-address from the DHCP scope configured.
Am i missing something? Do i like this function to do things it is not supposed to do?
Please let me know if someone had better experience.
Cheers,

Hey Sebastian,
Could you tell us a little more? I try to make it work too, but with little success.
What I do is:
- create a config group from my controller templates, do not add any controller to this config group, put in it all templates from my controller (including the local management user and WLANs).
- Create an auto provisioning filter, using this config group and my controller Ip addresses and MAC address, enable the filter and make sure it is not set to monitor only.
- I do see a file with my controller MAC address created at that instant, so I am close to being happy.
- In my DHCP server, option 150 points to WCS.
When I clear my controller config and reboot, it gets to autoinstall, receives an IP address from DHCP and the option 150 information. It then downloads the file with its MAC address... but no template is in there! I can't connect to my controller until I push a username and password to it, and none of my templates are there, no WLAN, nothing...
Any quick idea on what you did that I do not do?
thanks
Jerome

Auto provisioning users and send email notification to the users

I currently have CUCM 10.5 setup to auto register phones and I use Cisco prime provisioning 10.5 to auto provision the users.
Self provisioning is setup and users can call the IVR number enter the self service ID, which is their DN.
what I would like to do is send an email notifying the end user of their setup and how to use their telephony device Example (Self-service ID: 8888, auth code: 3333) is this possible from Prime Provisioning or CUCM.

Thanks Jamie
Wishful thinking I guess. It would have been seamless if they added that form of email notification to end users when auto provisioning. Anyways to get around that I used MS word mail merge and used the same spread sheet I used to batch provision the users to send the Self-service ID to the email contacts.

CP-7821 - How to auto provision this phone

Hello,
I have a set of 7800 series ip phones. I'm trying to register them on my system. I have already registered various SPA50X phones on my system and I do this by -
-Powering on the phone and connecting to the same network as my computer
-Find the Ip address of the phone and type into browser, to locate the web-ui
-Setup my auto-provision server and "point" the phone to this server
-The phone checks in and pulls down its configuration file and this provisions the phone in my system and once it checks in with the SIP server, can be used freely
Can I do this with the 7800 series phones or do i need the "Cisco Call Management" to get these phones working

This is Video Over IP, please move to a relevant area.

CUP Provisions user to SAP successfully but gives "Auto-Provisioning" error

Hi All,
I'm getting an "auto-provisioning" error in CUP when a "Change Account" workflow is approved. The strange thing is, CUP does successfully provision the change to the SAP backend. Yet, the "New Account" provisions successfully without the error.
Here is an example of the audit trail log from Change Account:
Request submitted for approval by Dylan Hack(HACKDY) on 06/28/2010 17:14
Approved By Dylan Hack(HACKDY) Path AE_AUTO_APPROV_ERROR and Stage AE_AUTOPROV_ERR on 06/28/2010 17:14
   Approved FI_xxxxx-DEV role for Add action with validity dates 06/28/2010-12/31/9999
   Approved FI_xxxxx-DEV role for Add action with validity dates 06/28/2010-12/31/9999
   Approved FI_xxxxx-DEV role for Add action with validity dates 06/28/2010-12/31/9999
   Approved FI_xxxxx-DEV role for Add action with validity dates 06/28/2010-12/31/9999
Auto provisioned for request on 06/28/2010 17:14
   User Provisioning failed for System(s) : DEV. Error Message :
   Role: FI_xxxxx assigned to user: testngin in System(s): DEV.
   Role: FI_xxxxx assigned to user: testngin in System(s): DEV.
   Role: FI_xxxxx assigned to user: testngin in System(s): DEV.
   Role: FI_xxxxx assigned to user: testngin in System(s): DEV.
Request submitted for reroute by system on 06/28/2010 17:14 due to auto provisioning failure
   Rerouted in the Path : AE_AUTO_APPROV_ERROR and Stage : AE_AUTOPROV_ERR to Path : AE_AUTO_APPROV_ERROR and Stage : AE_AUTOPROV_ERR
Note: the role names were replaced with "xxxxxxx."
The system log gives an error, but it is very vague:
2010-06-28 17:14:34,682 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_33] ERROR com.virsa.ae.service.ServiceException
com.virsa.ae.service.ServiceException
     at com.virsa.ae.service.sap.SAPProvisionDAO.intializeWithChangeUserInputParameters(SAPProvisionDAO.java:762)
     at com.virsa.ae.service.sap.SAPProvisionDAO.changeUser(SAPProvisionDAO.java:3457)
     at com.virsa.ae.service.sap.SAPProvisionDAO.changeUser(SAPProvisionDAO.java:3419)
Any ideas or suggestions?
Current software level AC5.3 SP12.
-Dylan

Hello Varun,
Thanks for the thought on this. We don't use User Defaults for Change Account, but do for New Account. You question prompted me to do more testing with very interesting results.
Results
New Account with User Defaults configured:
User provisioned successfully, no Auto-Provision error, Defaults NOT provisioned.
New Account without User Defaults configured:
User provisioned successfully, no Auto-Provision error.
Change Account with User Defaults configured:
User provisioned successfully, no Auto-Provision error, Defaults NOT provisioned.
Change Account without User Defaults configured:
User provisioned successfully, Auto-Provision ERROR, Defaults NOT provisioned.
In both New and Change Account, the configured User Defaults are NOT provisioned even though the user is provisioned. AC5.3 is on SP12, the RTA is VIRSANH SP12 and VIRSAHR SP10.
For the Change Account, the user is always provisioned regardless of User Defaults; however, when no User Default is configured, the Auto-Provisioning error occurs. The User Defaults NOT provisioning is a real problem, the CUP error message, I can work around for now.
What about on your side? Am I the only guy using SP12 here?

Auto provisioning for AD is not working in oim11gr2

Hi All,
I have current environment as OIM 11.1.2.0.7 and AD connector MSFT_AD_Base_11.1.1.5.0 with patch applied 14190610 and Connector_Server_111200
I configured an auto provisioning to AD
I created an access policy based on a role MSAD Users.
i am expecting when i assign this role user should provisioned to AD automatically but it is not done. I also ran the Evaluate User policies scheduler which in enable state.
i provisioned user manualy and its working fine. also i checked access policy with another target application R12 application it is also working fine.
but i dont y it not working for AD . I filled all required fields in process form lyk organisation and AD Server.
I ran in to same issue in DEV at that time i applied BP07 to oim and 14190610 patch to AD connector, after that it was worked
Now my UAT is in same environment still it is not working
Please suggest me some solution
Regards
$sid

Hi All,
I have current environment as OIM 11.1.2.0.7 and AD connector MSFT_AD_Base_11.1.1.5.0 with patch applied 14190610 and Connector_Server_111200
I configured an auto provisioning to AD
I created an access policy based on a role MSAD Users.
i am expecting when i assign this role user should provisioned to AD automatically but it is not done. I also ran the Evaluate User policies scheduler which in enable state.
i provisioned user manualy and its working fine. also i checked access policy with another target application R12 application it is also working fine.
but i dont y it not working for AD . I filled all required fields in process form lyk organisation and AD Server.
I ran in to same issue in DEV at that time i applied BP07 to oim and 14190610 patch to AD connector, after that it was worked
Now my UAT is in same environment still it is not working
Please suggest me some solution
Regards
$sid

EBusiness Suite User "Auto-provisioning" and "Self-Request" Problem

I have two types of OIM User, Staff and Contingent
Staff (Role = Full-Time)
Contingent (Role = Contractor / Role = Consultant)
Resource Object: eBusiness Suite User
Here's my RO configuration:
Auto Pre-populate: true
Allow Multiple: true
Self Request Allowed: true
Allow All: true
Auto-Launch: true
EBS Connector, by default has two forms:
UD_EBS_UO: Object Form
UD_EBS_USER: Process Form
I have requirement which will auto-provision eBusiness Suite User resource to Staff users.
Originally, UD_EBS_OU is the table name used by the RO. For auto-provisioning to work, I have implemented it this way:
First, I have defined a User Group for Staff and assign an Access Policy to it (for users with Role == Full-Time).
Then, I have detached Object Form UD_EBS_UO from the RO. This way, when Staff user is created in OIM, it is automatically provisioned with eBusiness Suite User, though it won't have a Resource Form, only a Process Form. Process Form fields are automatically pre-populated with values (via my Pre-populate adapters).
Now my problem is during Self-Request. Contingent user doesn't get auto-provisioned with EBS RO, but he can self-request for it. Problem is, since I detached the Object Form from the RO, user is not seeing any form during request. And I have a requirement that approver of the request should also be able to view/modify the details of the request form. But that is not possible now that Object Form does not exist for this RO.
Is it possible that Self-Request and Auto-Provisioning works both ways under the same Resource Object? How do I configure that? Appreciate your quick response and help. :)
Edited by: user10202544 on Feb 10, 2010 3:27 AM

Yes I have set permissions to all users for the Object Form.
It is required for me to have both Self Request and Auto-provisioning work for eBusiness Suite RO.
During approval, however, the approver needs to see the Object Form (where he can view/modify its values before approving it). That's impossible for me since I detached the Object Form from the Resource Object. I need do to this for auto-provisioning to work.
It seems that it doesn't work both ways. Any other suggestions?

OIM - OID (11g) auto-provision thru ldap sync

Hi,
I have configured ldap sync. I have following questions
1. We have created custom attributes in OID and referred to custom object class. Now when I try to create user in OIM, user is auto-provisioned to OID. But the custom attributes in OIM are not getting provisioned to OID (unable to see the custom attributes in user object of OID, unless we refer manually the custom object class). Can any one let me know how to auto-provision the custom attribtues into OID?
2. When user is auto-provisioned to OID, it is not showing any resource profile details of OID in OIM? Is it the expected behavior? But create, udpate, delete are happening as expected.
Please let me know if any one know the solution.

Hi,
Where you able to achieve this?? i have similar requirment where, i have added 5 custom attributes in both OIM and OID, when i create the users these attributes doesnot get updated on OID....should i add these UDF in any objectclass which OIM understands??please suggest
Thanks in advance

Auto-provisioning new users with GRC 10.1

There is some lack of clarity at my client on auto-provisioning new users into SAP systems with GRC 10. Here's what they want and I'm telling them they need SAP IdM.
The client will regularly have upwards of 500 new users on an on-going basis. These users are approved and created in Active Directory. The client believes that GRC 10 can now pick up these new users from Active Directory and then go ahead and provision them into ECC and CRM automatically, as soon as they're created, with no further approval required.
To the best of my knowledge, the easiest way to do this would be for IdM to do this, and have IdM trigger GRC for certain users, and to provision users who fall into this group of 500 users.
These users are different from regular users, who need to go through the approval workflows. Regular users will have managers and roles that need approval. These 500 or so users are approved to be created in the system and don't need to get caught up in the approval workflow.
Am I wrong in saying that IdM 7.2 is the best way to do this, or am I missing something about what GRC 10 can do?
Thanks for your help. I really appreciate it.

Hi Santosh,
In AC 10.1, I created one brf plus initiator rule.Although I saved it in GRAC_ACCESS_REQUEST package.Transport button is not available(Not greyed).
Dis you faced this issue..How to get this change in transport??
PS:Application are activated.
Thanks,
Mamoon

CUP - Initiator for roles not requiring approval (i.e. auto provisioned)

We recently upgraded to GRC 5.3, SP10 and started noticing that using CUP, for roles that should be automatically provisioned (i.e. no approval required), it is taking between 3 minutes 45 seconds to 5 minutes for the request to be successfully submitted and automatically approved with provisioning. I was wondering if anyone is experiencing simlar system performance
Our set-up for auto provisioned role requests is as follows:
1. Created initiator INI_NO_APPROVE using role for attribute
2. Created stage STG_NO_STAGE with Approver Determinator = No Stage
3. Created path definition PATH_NO_APPROVE with number of stages =2 and initiator = INI_NO_APPROVE
Thanks!

F.Y.I.
As per SAP's recommendation - we applied note:1423983 in all target provisioningn systems and this resolved the issue.

GRC 5.3 CUP auto provisioning of Mitigation Assignment in RAR

Hello,
Is there any other workflow that needs to be triggered for the auto provisioning of the Mitigation control id assignment to the userid in RAR system from CUP, upon request completion?
I created a request that after the final stage of sox approver, got auto provisioned roles assigned to the user id in the SAP system , but it also stated that auto provisioning failed and got re-routed to the detour path of the security admin as I configured in case of auto provisioning failure. When I look at the error log, it states:
User Provisioning failed for System(s) : XYZ. Error Message : User type TE is unknown
Role: ROLEA assigned to user: TESTER1 in System(s): XYZ.
1). So, even though the approved role is being assigned to the user in the backend system, some other stuff is failing at auto provisioning. And I thought it might be the mitigation control assignment to the userid in RAR. I have the mitigation fields/objects active. But how do I ensure the auto-assignment of mitigation control ids also gets assigned on the same request upon sox approval?
2). The other question is where is the value of the 'controller' stored when configuring a stage for workflow approver determinator in the sox approver stage? Where is this value picked up from? We don't want to use the RAR mitigation approvers or monitors, we want to use a custom approver id from CUP and then the control id to be assigned upon approval automatically to the userid in RAR via CUP request completion during auto provisioning. Is this possible? The only thing failing for us is trying to determine how to create the custom approver determinator for SOX approver in CUP since it asks for 'attribute' value for workflow type 'Compliant User Provisioning' which doesn't make sense for this.
And then the above error even though the user role assignment is auto provisioning already but still giving the error as I listed above and re-routing to detour path instead of completing the request. Is it due to auto provisioning failure of mitigation control assignment in RAR?
Thanks in advance,
Alley
Edited by: Alley1 on Sep 20, 2011 1:15 AM

Hi Karell,
Here is response to your questions:
I can use the following CAD in an AE workflow: web service to fetch role approvers. I question this as it is merely a RE workflow service : No. As far as I know the web service is only for RE/ERM.
Can the Risk Analysis be initiated in stage x automatically once stage (x-1) was completed. So no person involved, it is mandatory however, in my opinion there should be no extra person involved to actually press the button "Risk Analysis" : No. There is no way to automate the risk analysis part. Someone will have to click on the button to check for SoD violations. You can configure to run automatic risk analysis when the request is submitted but this is not 100% perfect. If someone adds or removes role during approval phase, it will invalidate the risk analysis which was run during request submission.
Can somehow the Risk Owners defined in the RAR componed be asked to approve/reject risk that came out of the Risk Analysis described in my previous point. They should only be contacted when there is a risk indicated. : This is possible by following Babak's workflow.
Regards,
Alpesh

Limitations of Auto-Provisioning through CUP (AE)

Hi all,
I am looking for some information on what are all the benefits and limitations of using auto-provisioning over manual provisioning for the backend systems through CUP (AE).
We are implementing GRC AC 5.3 and it is organization's business decision whether we need the proviosing piece to be automated or not. However, I would like to get your suggestions based on your project experiences esp in a decentralized security administration where security admins are in different geographical locations and have to provision only for their user groups.
Can we perform all the activities thro' auto-provision similar to a security administrator manually creating a user, assign appropriate user groups etc., or is there any limitation?
Which approach would be better for decentralized administration?
Appreciate your suggestions..
Thanks
Siri

Hi Alpesh & Williams,
The user default settings such as date, timezone, decimal etc can be configured through the 'user defaults' and 'user default mapping' . I see the option of assigning user groups and appropriate parameters too.
Say the user belong to user group AAA_XXX and another user belongs to AAA_YYY, where
AAA - location
XXX - Dept
I have configured these (location, dept) as required fields while entering the request in CUP .
However, during run time how will the correct user group be assigned to the user. Is it through the user default mapping? Where do we maintain all the user group information that is available in the ECC system? Do we have to create user default, user default mapping for each user group??
The documentation from SAP is not very clear .. Appreciate if you can provide some lights on this area.
Thanks
Siri

GRC 5.3 - Auto Provisioning completed but Status remains Open

Hi All,
Lately GRC 5.3 does not change the status to closed once approval has been submitted. Auto Provisioning completed successfully as roles was assigned to back end ABAP system.
Please advice how to change the status to CLOSED once auto provisioning completes.
Thank you
Jacky.

Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the new issue with SP17. Everything is working fine before we upgrade to SP17. Is anyone can help to solve this issue?
Thank you.
Regards,
Merdelyn

Auto-Provisioning Guest Accounts

Guys
Whilst on a recent wireless PVT I heard mention of a method of auto provisioning guest accounts.
The system appeared to use some sort of keypad device that the guest entered details into. This device then used Radius to generate a guest account with username and password credentials then being printed out for the guest.
I am fully aware of the NAC Guest Server and WCS capabilities. This is a different system entirely.
Can anyone throw on any light on this for me please?
Regards
Roger

I know ISE can do this also, but I don't know of anything else that does this.
Thanks,
Scott Fella
Sent from my iPhone

Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning?

What is Cisco Prime™ Collaboration Provisioning?

You can get info by just searching on cisco.com
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/prime/collaboration/10-0/provisioning/guide/Cisco_Prime_Collaboration_Provisioning_Guide_10/Cisco_Prime_Collaboration_Provisioning_Guide_10_chapter_01110.html

Cisco Asterisk auto provisioning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for