Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS-S can't accept GLC-FE-100FX SFP Transceiver

I have Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS-S with OS version 12.2(55)EY, the problem it's can't accept GLC-FE-100FX SFP module, it's show
unsupported SFP error but it' work fine with GLC-FE-100LX.
Cisco 100-Megabit Ethernet SFP Modules Compatibility Matrix in bellow link show WS-C3750V2-24FS-S work with Transceiver Models :
GLC-GE-100FX
GLC-FE-100FX
GLC-FE-100LX
GLC-FE-100BX-D
GLC-FE-100BX-U
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL632702.pdf
Any help is appreciated

Hi,
I'm connectiong to 100FX SFP ports ( 1 to 24), showing error message:
“ %PHY-4-SFP-NOT-SUPPORTED: The SFP in Fa1/0/1 in not supported”
Thanks

Similar Messages

Alternative switch to Cisco Catalyst 3750v2-24FS and 3750-24FS

I`m looking for an alternative to these two switches:
1. WS-C3750V2-24FS-S Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS Switch with 24 100FX SFP + 2 Gigabit Ethernet SFP Ports
2. Cisco Catalyst 3750-24FS (WS-C3750-24FS-S 100BASE-FX)
They are now EOL and not available.
I have a campus style network and need to be able to connect multiple 100FX fibre switches back to a central switch. The 1st unit uses 100FX SFP modules and the second has in-built 100FX ports. I`m struggling to find anything from Cisco that will give me multiple (i.e 12+) 100FX ports.
Could anyone please point me in the right direction?
Many thanks,
Paul

Hi Paul ,
Replacement for both switch is WS-C3650-48TS-S.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5528/eos-eol-notice-c51-730227.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/end_of_life_c51-687707.html
Regards
Don't forget to rate helpful posts
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

100BaseFX and Cisco Catalyst 3750G

Hi,
I need some help, I have a factory plant running some IE 3000 and Rockwell Stratix 8000 with GLC-FE-100FX-RGD transceiver to some older switches I need to replace the idea is to use Cisco 3750G, I saw in the Cisco 3750G datasheet a GLC-GE-100FX= transceiver would they work together point-to-point? what sort of connector do they use are they LC also?
The idea is to use 100BaseFX MM because of the costs, distance (800M) and the bandwith being light.
Thank You

The GLC-GE-100FX= and the GLC-FE-100FX-RGD SFPs have the same optical performance specifications, so they will interoperate across a link. The RGD SFP has a higher operating temperature range for industrial applications (per data sheet), where the IE 3000 is typically installed.
Hope this helps!

How many Cisco Catalyst 3850 switches can make up a Cisco StackPower stack?

I know the number of Cisco 3850 switches for stacking is 9, so, if I make up a Cisco StackPower stack, MAX is 9, too?

Hi, emma, only 4 switches can become part of the same Cisco StackPower stack in a ring topology.
For the Cisco 3850 switches stack number,there are two types:
Up to 9 Cisco Catalyst 3850 switches can be stacked together to build single logical StackWise-480 switch since Cisco IOS XE Release 3.3.0SE. Prior to Cisco IOS XE Release3.3.0SE, up to 4 Cisco Catalyst 3850 switches could be stacked together.

Connection of LC/APC fiber patch cords to Cisco Catalyst 6500 $ Cisco Access 3750 Switches

I have an LC/APC fiber patch cord infrastructure and I want to connect it to Cisco Catalyst 6500 & Cisco Access 3750 Switches. what type of transceiver should be used?
I read a note on Cisco website stating the following for Cisco SFP+ transceivers:
Note: "Only connections with patch cords with PC or UPC connectors are supported. Patch cords with APC connectors are not supported. All cables and cable assemblies used must be compliant with the standards specified in the standards section"

Thank you, but my question is that I have a single mode fiber patch cord with LC/APC connector while cisco stating a note that only use LC/PC or LC/UPC type of connectors with SFP+ transceiver.
So what type of transceiver should I use to connect LC/APC patch cord to cisco switches? Is there another type or SFP+ still can be used?

Ask the Expert: Layer 2 Security on Cisco Catalyst Platforms

With Wilson Bonilla
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about about issues in designing, planning, and implementing Layer 2 security in your LAN network with expert Wilson Bonilla.
Wilson will cover topics that network engineers face daily such as Spanning Tree Protocol security, private VLANs, IP source guard, protected ports, dynamic ARP inspection, virtual LAN access-control lists (VLAN ACLs), and Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) snooping over Cisco Catalyst platforms. With the fast growth of networks, Layer 2 security is even more critical in the LAN to help your network become more reliable, efficient, and secure. Wilson will answer your questions about LAN networks with Cisco Catalyst switches.
Wilson Bonilla is a technical networking trainer at the Learning and Development Department for Cisco Technical Assistance Center located in Costa Rica. Before joining the Training Department, he worked for the Cisco TAC as a customer support engineer focused on LAN Switching for more than two years. While working on LAN switching, Wilson also had roles such as technical leader and trainer, adding to his area of expertise in Cisco Catalyst Layer 2 switching. He has CCNP routing and switching certification and is currently studying to achieve his CCNA certification in data center.
Remember to use the rating system to let Wilson know if you've received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Wilson might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Network Infrastructure community, subcommunity, LAN, Switching and Routing, shortly after the event. This event lasts through November, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and those of other Cisco Support Community members.

Hello NetNavi.
Check the post above about MacSec for more information and let me know if you need further clarification, if so I will do my best,
In regards to best practices there is a Cisco document; it describes deployments and best practices in every scenario; Supplicants, authenticator, authentication services and other configurations. Please check it out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6638/deploy_guide_c17-663760.html
In regards to Private VLANS:
What is a Private Vlan?
A private Vlan is a way to isolate hosts within the same Vlan or broadcast domain. So even when you might have devices sharing the same broadcast domain they can be isolated, this isolated is configured based on sub-domains also most often called primary and secondary Vlans.
What is a primary Vlan?
The primary Vlan is representation of the private Vlan, a primary Vlan has one or more secondary Vlans, a switch uses the primary Vlan to present traffic from the secondary Vlans to its neighboring devices.
What is a secondary Vlan?
A secondary Vlan is a sub-domain of the primary Vlan. We could say that the secondary Vlans belongs to the primary. The must be associated to a primary Vlan. There are two types of secondary vlans: Isolated and Community secondary Vlans.
What does it happen to host within a secondary isolated Vlan?
Host within the isolated vlan; can’t communicate to neither other host in the same isoalted vlan nor host in a community vlan.
What does it happen to host within the secondary community Vlan?
Host within the community Vlan can communicate with other host assigned to the same community vlan, but they can’t talk to host in other community vlans.
What are the benefits of implementing private Vlans?
Scalability: The most common scenario is a service provider. Imagine all customers of a service provider connected through DSL, cable modem… it’s very likely that all customers belong to the same broadcast domain, however if that’s the case why is it that I can’t use my neighbor’s printer, or maybe why is it that I can’t access the files he has store in his computer, (security) we are in the same broadcast shouldn’t I be able to at least ping his ip address?. Well that’s because the ISP must guarantee some type of security for their customers, and because put every single customer that they have in a single Vlan is not scalable they use private Vlans.
Examples:
ISP use private vlans to protect from security bridges, Private vlans and isolated Vlans are used to protect personal information for example from one customer to another.
DMZ; Many implementations utilizes private vlans in a DMZ to limt or minimize that risk of a compromised server.
I would like to share this documentation with you for further information and configuration guidelines
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk814/technologies_configuration_example09186a008017acad.shtml#hw
This document explains what Cisco Catalyst switches support Private Vlans.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note09186a0080094830.shtml
Let me know if you have further questions.
Regards
Wilson B.

Cisco Catalyst 6500 version 12.2(33)SXI13 configured as DHCP server for a VLAN responds to Windows 7 client with status code NOA

Can anyone help figure out why the Catalyst 6509 is not able to assign an IPv6 address? Thank you.
Cisco Catalyst 6500 version 12.2(33)SXI13 configured as DHCP server for a VLAN responds to Windows 7 client with status code NOADDRS-AVAIL(2). My configuration on the 6500 for the DHCPv6 server is:
ipv6 dhcp database disk0://DHCPV6-DB
ipv6 dhcp pool VLAN206IPV6
prefix-delegation pool VLAN206IPV6-POOL
dns-server 2620:B700:0:1001::53
domain-name global.bio.com
ipv6 local pool VLAN206IPV6-POOL 2620:B700:0:12C7::/65 65
interface Vlan206
description *** IPv6 Subnet ***
ip address 10.2.104.2 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address 2620:B700:0:12C7::2/64
ipv6 nd prefix 2620:B700:0:12C7::/64 14400 14400 no-autoconfig
ipv6 nd managed-config-flag
ipv6 dhcp server VLAN206IPV6
standby version 2
standby 0 ip 10.2.104.1
standby 0 preempt
standby 6 ipv6 2620:B700:0:12C7::1/64
standby 6 preempt
I'm getting a result from my debug as follows:
Apr 10 16:28:02.873 PDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet2/2, changed state to up
Apr 10 16:28:02.873 PDT: %LINK-SP-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet2/2, changed state to up
Apr 10 16:28:02.877 PDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet2/2, changed state to up
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: IPv6 DHCP: Received SOLICIT from FE80::5D5E:7EBD:CDBF:2519 on Vlan206
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: IPv6 DHCP: detailed packet contents
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: src FE80::5D5E:7EBD:CDBF:2519 (Vlan206)
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: dst FF02::1:2
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: type SOLICIT(1), xid 8277025
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: option ELAPSED-TIME(8), len 2
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: elapsed-time 101
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: option CLIENTID(1), len 14
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: 00010001195FD895F01FAF10689E
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: option IA-NA(3), len 12
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: IAID 0x0FF01FAF, T1 0, T2 0
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: option UNKNOWN(39), len 32
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: option VENDOR-CLASS(16), len 14
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: option ORO(6), len 8
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: DOMAIN-LIST,DNS-SERVERS,VENDOR-OPTS,UNKNOWN
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: IPv6 DHCP: Option IA-NA(3) is not supported yet
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: IPv6 DHCP: Sending ADVERTISE to FE80::5D5E:7EBD:CDBF:2519 on Vlan206
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: IPv6 DHCP: detailed packet contents
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: src FE80::21D:E6FF:FEE4:4400
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: dst FE80::5D5E:7EBD:CDBF:2519 (Vlan206)
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: type ADVERTISE(2), xid 8277025
Apr 10 16:28:03.861 PDT: option SERVERID(2), len 10
Apr 10 16:28:03.865 PDT: 00030001001DE6E44400
Apr 10 16:28:03.865 PDT: option CLIENTID(1), len 14
Apr 10 16:28:03.865 PDT: 00010001195FD895F01FAF10689E
Apr 10 16:28:03.865 PDT: option STATUS-CODE(13), len 15
Apr 10 16:28:03.865 PDT: status code NOADDRS-AVAIL(2)
Apr 10 16:28:03.865 PDT: status message: NOADDRS-AVAIL

Hello,
maybe hitting the following bug.
Pv6 Address Assignment Support for IPv6 DHCP Server
CSCse81385
Hope this helps

Cisco Catalyst 3850 as ntp master

Hi All,
I have 2 x Cisco Catalyst 3850 stacked together. What are your recommendations if I use the C3850 as a ntp master for all edge switches connected in my network? All edge switches must be authenticated if it needs NTP sychronization. But other than that, what are the downsides?
For example,
1. I heard that switches do not have an internal clock so is a poor device to be a centralized NTP master.
2. I have also read that switches also have slow CPU processors that may lack the processing required.
3. Its NTP sychronization will use external NTP servers which are resolved into IP addresses (e.g. pool.ntp.org). IP address can change. What other more reliable NTP sources are there?
4. Any other thoughts and comments are most welcome.

Firstly, DO NOT use the command "ntp master". Cisco do not recommend using this commands because this will confuse the NTP propagation inside the network.
Next, all Cisco devices do not have a dedicated clock. All appliances need to get SNTP/NTP time synch from somewhere. This "somewhere" could either be a dedicated GPS-based NTP server and/or a time synch somewhere out in the internet.
You can also use the command "ntp update-calendar". This new command allows appliances to take regular "snapshot" of the time and save it into the NVRAM. In case there was a reboot or a power failure, the appliance's time is not too far away instead of waiting 5 to 10 minutes for SNTP/NTP to synch.

802.1x on Cisco Catalyst 2960

I am trying to enable 802.1x on one of
the switchports of the Cisco Catalyst
2960:
C2960#sh run | i radius
aaa authentication login test group radius local
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
radius-server host 10.250.97.26 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
radius-server source-ports 1645-1646
radius-server key 123456
C2960#sh run | i dot
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
dot1x system-auth-control
dot1x guest-vlan supplicant
dot1x critical eapol
C2960#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
C2960(config)#int g0/14
C2960(config-if)#dot1x ?
% Unrecognized command
C2960(config-if)#dot1x
As you can see, I can not enable 802.1x
at the interface level. The code is am running is 12.2.25SEE4:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
* 1 24 WS-C2960G-24TC-L 12.2(25)SEE4 C2960-LANBASEK9-M
System image file is "flash:c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE4.bin"
According to Cisco, this image supports
802.1x. Why can't enable it at the
interface level?
Can someone help me out? Thanks.

some additional info:
C2960#sh dot1x all
Sysauthcontrol Enabled
Dot1x Protocol Version 2
Critical Recovery Delay 100
Critical EAPOL Enabled
C2960#

Cisco catalyst 2960 booting garbage, help on restore IOS

Dear All,
This is my first time on terminal access of Cisco Catalyst 2960 (2960TC-L), normally would use the web configuration for most task.
Now the switch has an issue with the web interface and when I try to access through terminal, I was greeted with garbage upon the booting of the switch, I searched for the terminal boot process and it wasn't what I was expected for my switch. I was a bit dumbfound now of how can I recover the firmware to its default stage, now that I cannot even boot through its terminal console.
Any help is highly appreciated. Thank you for your time.

Hi,
I just verified with my colleague of whom have done quite a few bits before I took over his task.
His reply was he actually did an IOS flash before, though I'm not sure how he did it, but according to him, it was actually a success and the web interface still works for few times before it become like this.
As I tried another time to goes into root mode (or Admin mode??) for the switch, the steps as I performed below:
1. Refer to cisco-2960-putting-setting.jpg for the settings. I press Open and it does display the console Window, no issue there.
2. I hold the "mode" button on the switch and turn on the switch power, and after few seconds the screen display as such (refer to cisco-2960-putty-output2.jpg), the SYST L.E.D. did flash with following pattern: Green (blink ~15 times) then Orange-Green (repeat blink twice) then Green (stable light), for this I was expecting it to goes off after few seconds but it didn't, I wait about a minute before I let go the "mode" button.
3. After I let go the "mode" button, it goes to the screen (refer cisco-2960-putty-output3.jpg), and the SYST still blinking, possibly infinitely... with the console output screen stays like that... and whatever I entered display weird/garbage characters instead, I can't do anything on it.
Each tries display different weird characters, as the SYST still blinking infinitely.
I'm unsure if I'm giving enough details for online troubleshooting, I'll try my best to give as per instructed.
Thank you for your time.

Cisco Catalyst 2960-X and Cisco Prime compatibility

Hello All,
I had review all the compatibility matrix of versions of Cisco Prime 1.2, 1.4 and 2.0, and just can't find the Cisco Catalyst 2960-X series as a listed device, which really surprises me.
Can you clear that out??
Thanks,

The 2960X (and XR) support was added with Device Pack 2 for PI 2.0. It was released on 22 January 2014 and is available here.
(PI 2.1 won't be out until later this year, release date not yet announced.)
Following are the 2960X/XR types added:
Cisco Catalyst 2960-X Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1699
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1690
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1691
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1692
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1693
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1694
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1695
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1696
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1697
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1698
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PSK-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1700
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1701
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1702
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1703
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1704
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960-XR Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1797
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1798
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1799
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1800
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1801
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1802
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1803
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1804
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1805
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1806
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1807
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1808
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1809
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1810
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1811
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1812
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1813
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1814
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1815
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1816
>=12.1
IOS

Cisco Catalyst 2950/2960/3750 Multicast Traffic Preference

Hello all,
we, as a student company act as an ISP for university dormitories. We would like to (if it's possible) deploy QoS to prefer multicast traffic over all other types of traffic.
Devices used in network:
Acces layer: Cisco Catalyst 2950, 12.1(22)EA14
Dristribution layer: Cisco Catalyst 2960G, 12.2(58)SE1
Core layer: Cisco Catalyst 3750G, 12.2(52)SE
Do you see any possibility to solve this with these devices? We have almost no experience with QoS, therefore any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Hmm, I think it should be doable although the 2950s, if non-E variants, are especially weak in QoS features. I.e. those might create some issues.
With the 2960G and 3750G, you often will create problems when you enable QoS because QoS, by default, allocates its buffers resources for 4 egress queues per port rather than using all for 1 egress queue per port. However, this can be countered by QoS parameter tuning, but that takes some QoS expertize to match to your traffic and your overall QoS policy.

CISCO CATALYST 4507R+E + Supervisor 8-E

Hi,
I need help and clarification regarding the software license of Sup 7-E and Sup 8-E. Based on the catalog it ships with IOS XE universal image? Here are my inquiries.
1. With IOS XE universal image, what is the software license installed in Sup 7-E and Sup 8-E? Is it LAN Base or IP Base?
2. Is there an option to purchase the Sup 7-E or Sup 8-E with an Enterprise Base license?
3. How many priority queue does it support?
Thank you,

Please find answer:
1- Cisco provides LAN Base software only when purchasing SUP7E or SUP7L-E bundle with a single Supervisor, in all other cases IP Base license is provided at no additional cost.
There will continue to be three packages: LAN Base, IP Base, and Enterprise Services. ( IP Base and Enterprise services to be purchases seperately)
2-
Q.    Which licenses are available for Supervisor Engine 7-E, 7L-E or a Cisco Catalyst 4500-X Series system?
A.     See Table 1 for package licenses. These will be delivered with new Supervisors or available as an upgrade through Cisco software activation. The Cisco Catalyst 4500-X Series only supports IP Base (default) and Enterprise Services (as an upgrade).
Table 1.       Package licenses
Package Name
Prerequisites
License Types
LAN Base
None
Permanent
IP Base
IP Base
Permanent, temporary
Enterprise Services
IP Base
Permanent, temporary
Q.    Where can I learn more about Cisco software activation?
A.     http://www.cisco.com/go/sa.
3- http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-4500-series-switches/white_paper_c11-539588.html
HtH
Regards
Inayath
*Plz dont forget to rate usefull posts.

Vlan mapping cisco catalyst 3560

Hello
which Cisco switches support vlan mapping ?
and did Cisco catalyst 3560 support vlan mapping or not ??
thank u

Thank u pdanekul
I know 3750 support vlan mapping but with 3560 i can not see vlan mapping config
switchport vlan mapping
and also i can not see it in cisco Catalyst 3560 Software Configuration Guide, Release 12.2(52)SE
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3560/software/release/12-2_52_se/configuration/guide/3560scg/swtunnel.html

Error in switch ports POE model, "Cisco Catalyst 2960S-24PS-L Switch"

I have problem with the poe switch Cisco Catalyst 2960S-24PS-L posts does not respond, and me the following error resporta was t
%PLATFORM_ENV-3-ILP_PORT_POST_ERR: %s can’t be brought up because it failed POST
in Inline Power test.
he source of that error and what are the possible causes

Hey Dustin,
Device needs to be RMA'ed. The inline power supply has failed.
HTH.
Regards,
RS.

Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS-S can't accept GLC-FE-100FX SFP Transceiver

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for