CISCO CATALYST 4507R+E + Supervisor 8-E

Hi,
I need help and clarification regarding the software license of Sup 7-E and Sup 8-E. Based on the catalog it ships with IOS XE universal image? Here are my inquiries.
1. With IOS XE universal image, what is the software license installed in Sup 7-E and Sup 8-E? Is it LAN Base or IP Base?
2. Is there an option to purchase the Sup 7-E or Sup 8-E with an Enterprise Base license?
3. How many priority queue does it support?
Thank you,

Please find answer:
1- Cisco provides LAN Base software only when purchasing SUP7E or SUP7L-E bundle with a single Supervisor, in all other cases IP Base license is provided at no additional cost.
There will continue to be three packages: LAN Base, IP Base, and Enterprise Services. ( IP Base and Enterprise services to be purchases seperately)
2-
Q.    Which licenses are available for Supervisor Engine 7-E, 7L-E or a Cisco Catalyst 4500-X Series system?
A.     See Table 1 for package licenses. These will be delivered with new Supervisors or available as an upgrade through Cisco software activation. The Cisco Catalyst 4500-X Series only supports IP Base (default) and Enterprise Services (as an upgrade).
Table 1.       Package licenses
Package Name
Prerequisites
License Types
LAN Base
None
Permanent
IP Base
IP Base
Permanent, temporary
Enterprise Services
IP Base
Permanent, temporary
Q.    Where can I learn more about Cisco software activation?
A.     http://www.cisco.com/go/sa.
3- http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-4500-series-switches/white_paper_c11-539588.html
HtH
Regards
Inayath
*Plz dont forget to rate usefull posts.

Similar Messages

Cisco Catalyst 4507R+E with WS-X4748 blade, ports not working

I have a Cisco Catalyst 4507R+E (with Sup7-E) and two blades; one WS-X4748-RJ45V+E and one WS-X4648-RJ45-E.
When I connect a device to a port on the WS-X4748-RJ45V+E blade the port will not come up, show interface shows the status as "notconnect". When I connect the same device to the WS-X4648-RJ45-E blade the interface comes up.
The WS-X4748-RJ45V+E blade seems to have initialised okay, it appears in the output of "show module" as OK.
I get exactly the same effect on a second, identically configured Catalyst 4507R+E.
The software version is IOS XE 3.1.0SG, which according to the release notes supports the WS-X4748-RJ45V+E blade. Has anybody else seen anything like this?

I have 2 Core switches, single SUP on each.
Line cards #1 and #2 randomly stop forwarding packets, only solution is to reload the switch ( hw-module reset does not work ). I have cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.05.00.E.152-1.E.bin and the sympton looks the same as the described one,
although the code is newer than 3.2.2SG.
Now we are downgrading to cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.04.02.SG.151-2.SG2.bin to check if that solves the issue,
otherwise we´ll try removing/re-inserting the modules, and if issue persists, most probably RMA the Core1.
We´ve sent a show tech to Cisco support while the issue was happening.
Current modules on the Core switches.
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------
1    48 10/100/1000BaseT EEE (RJ45)            WS-X4748-RJ45-E    CAT1627L48B
2    48 10/100/1000BaseT EEE (RJ45)            WS-X4748-RJ45-E    CAT1629L0ZY
3     4 Sup 7-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP)   WS-X45-SUP7-E      CAT1629L1PD
5    12 1000BaseX (SFP)                        WS-X4612-SFP-E     JAE163007EO
M MAC addresses                    Hw Fw           Sw               Status
--+--------------------------------+---+------------+----------------+---------
1 30f7.0d57.80c0 to 30f7.0d57.80ef 1.1                               Ok
2 30f7.0dac.fd40 to 30f7.0dac.fd6f 1.1                               Ok
3 30f7.0dca.6c00 to 30f7.0dca.6c03 2.1 15.0(1r)SG10 03.05.00.E       Ok
5 a493.4c44.13e8 to a493.4c44.13f3 1.1                               Ok
Mod Redundancy role     Operating mode      Redundancy status
----+-------------------+-------------------+----------------------------------
3   Active Supervisor   SSO                 Active

Cisco Catalyst 4507R Module WS X4424GB RJ 45, Multi-speed Gigabit Ethernet Switching Module (24-port)

i am confused if this one
Cisco Catalyst 4507R Module WS X4424GB RJ 45, Multi-speed Gigabit Ethernet Switching Module (24-port)
would be compatible to its chasis if change by this one
WS-X4424-GBRJ45-RF
Catalyst 4000 24port 101001000 Module RJ45 REFURBISHED

Yes it you get the refurbished with the good one then it would get detected and works fine.
BTW- This module is EOL /EOS and below is the replacement part for the same:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-4500-series-switches/eol_c51_574038.html
WS-X4424-GB-RJ45
Catalyst 4500 24-port 10/100/1000 Module (RJ45)
Replacement-PartWS-X4548-GB-RJ45
Catalyst 4500 Enhanced 48-Port 10/100/1000 Base-T (RJ-45)
HTH
Regards
Inayath
***** Plz rate all usefull posts.

After upgrading ios Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Supervisor Engine 2T to the latest release the ASA-SM module is not recognized

after upgrading ios Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Supervisor Engine 2T to the latest release the ASA-SM module is not recognized it is disabled. the FPD
is not recognized any more. reverted back to previous ios with no luck

Duplicate post.
Being discussed actively in this thread.

After upgrading ios Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Supervisor Engine 2T ASA-SM is disabled

after upgrading ios Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Supervisor Engine 2T to the latest release the ASA-SM module is not recognized it is disabled. the FPD
is not recognized any more. reverted back to previous ios with no luck

What IOS are you running on your Supervisor 2T? As long as it's 15.0(1)SY1 or later you should be OK. (Reference).
If it's not working with that I'd try reload of the ASA SM module (from IOS cli - e.g. "hw-module <module#> reset" and, failing that, "no power-enable module <module#>" followed by "power-enable module <module#>) while the new Supervisor is installed. Watch the log for relevant messages during that process.

Unable to connect a Netapp San to a Cisco Catalyst in 10Gb

I have a Cisco Catalyst 4507R with a WS-X4606-X2-E and X2-10GB-SR to be connected to a Netapp SAN and it does not work.
With show interface transceiver detail it seems that the power sent by netapp is good but the link stay in dwon down state
Any help?

down/down is related to layer 1 issue. Make sure the SFP is correct on both ends (and same type: LR vs SR) and also make sure you are using the right fiber. You can loop back on the same catalyst both sfps with the cable to see if the link comes up.

Catalyst 4507R plus E Switch Discovery Issue

Hi,
I am having issues doing automatic discovery for Cisco Catalyst 4507R plus E Switch IOS 12.2(54)SG, I am using IP ping sweep to discover devices on my network.
When i first setup LMS4.0 with few devices on the network, i discover the C4507 without a problem together with other devices i have on the network but for some reasons now its failing to discover C4507. I have large numbers of WS-C3560X and C4507 on the network, WS-C3560X always discovered just fine.
I tried to use SolarWinds network device monitor I installed on the server to check if there's any SNMP or connectivity issues. I can discover C4507 using Solarwinds without a problem, so im suspecting it could be LMS configuration issue.
Is there any special settings I need to tweak to make this working?

A newer version of IOS should generally be fine.
It's generally the SNMP sysObjectID that LSM keys into. As noted in the table you cited, it should be 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1286 for the 4507R+E.

Cisco Catalyst Supervisor communication issue?

Hey all,
I had a slight issue regarding two supervisor engines on a Cisco Catalyst 4500 device where the keepalives between the two sups lost communication for roughly 50~ seconds. This triggered an SNMP alert but it looks like they regained connectivity before a switchover was initiated. Has anyone ever experienced anything like this before?

You obviously need to configure the ports etc. but the switch should recognise the module as long as you have an IOS that supports it.
There is nothing extra to do, you just slot the module in.
If you are connecting all your distribution switches to the 6500 then if you don't need a vlan/IP subnet in multiple buildings then you should use L3 connections to the 6500.
Note also that you may want to consider at some time in the future a second supervisor or another chassis as this 6500 with one supervisor is a single point of failure ie. if it goes then there is no communication between buildings.
Jon

Password recovery at catalyst 4507R-E

Hi. I have catalyst 4507R-E and 2 engines are located at this catalyst. the engines are active standby. when i begin to recover i write the recover config at main engine then i must be reset the catalyst after reboot active engine go to satndby and standby go to active. so i can not recover it.
how can i solve this?
must i first remove standby engine and then recover active engine
then put the standby and active engine configuration go to standby.
am i rigth? i am afraid the i lost the configuration because i have not backup configuration.
i used this PDF.
please write your comment.
thank you very much.

Hi teymur,
You never lost your configuration, what you need to do is...
1. Make a complete config synch between active and standby supervisor engine (I hope autosync is already enabled)
2. Write the config to NVRAM on standby supervisor engine.
3. Now when you put back the standby supervisor engine, reload the active supervisor engine whcih take the standby be active and active be standby.
Also I would like to infor the password recovery procedure for you...
Try the below procedure with only one supervisor in the chassis.
1) Connect the console cable to the Supervisor IV console port
2) Reset the 4507 by power cycling the unit.
3) Interrupt the boot sequence by hitting CTRL+C
4) Using the confreg command, I set it to skip the boot-up configuration.
5) I issue the reset command to reboot the 4507 again.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps663/products_password_recovery09186a00800945f7.shtml
Please rate the helpful posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

Catalyst 4507R+E Clock Module

Hi,
I noticed that my 4507R+E chassis have the following module installed:
WS-X4K-CLOCK-E
I found in this EOL announcement that it's the clock module for 4507R-E chassis and is EoS since 2013:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-4500-series-switches/eol_C51-715893.html
Why the same module is installed in the new chassis and there are no spare parts available ?
Thanks,
Aron

This catalyst 4507R-E whit this Supervisor Supervisor II+ WS-X4013+ suppourt thos module WS-X4648-RJ45V+E ?
No, your supervisor only supports classic linecards but the WS-4648-RJ45V+E is not a classic line card so it is not supported. Have a look at this link and refer to Table 1 which shows which supervisors you could use with this card -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2710/ps5494/product_data_sheet0900aecd802109ea.html
Jon

Cisco Catalyst 4500X

I want to buy Cisco Catalyst 4500-X-16SFP+ and upgrade the license to Enterprise service. But license description show "IP Base to Ent. Services license for 16 Port Catalyst 4500-X". Is it means that only 16 port is Enterprise Service? If I add more 8 Ports module ,can it use Ent Service?
Please kindly advise.
Thanks,
Mano

Is it means that only 16 port is Enterprise Service?
The license is in blocks of 16- or 32 ports. Let's say you purchase an Enterprise license for 16-ports and you got an optional 8-port module. You purchase an additional license of "C4500X-16P-IP-ES" and this allows you an additional 16-ports of license. You can't purchase a license for only 8 ports.
Cisco Catalyst 4500E Supervisor 7-E and 7L-E and Cisco Catalyst 4500-X Series Software Activation Licensing Deployment Guide

Catalyst 4006 with Supervisor Engine II Multicast Support?

Hi, I have a Catalyst 4006 with Supervisor Engine II. I would like to know if it is possible to enable multicast routing via CGMP or IGMP. I know it is possible with the Supervisor Engine III. Any advice would be appreciated.

Cat4006 wiht sup II runs a CatOS and it's stricly Layer 2 therefore it does not support any kind of routing (L3). It does support multicast services. Switches can use CGMP, IGMP filtering, or GMRP to dynamically configure switch ports so that IP multicast traffic is forwarded only to ports that are associated with IP multicast hosts.
Please refer to this link:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat4000/8_3/configur/multi.htm#wp1019880
Please rate all posts.

Connection of LC/APC fiber patch cords to Cisco Catalyst 6500 $ Cisco Access 3750 Switches

I have an LC/APC fiber patch cord infrastructure and I want to connect it to Cisco Catalyst 6500 & Cisco Access 3750 Switches. what type of transceiver should be used?
I read a note on Cisco website stating the following for Cisco SFP+ transceivers:
Note: "Only connections with patch cords with PC or UPC connectors are supported. Patch cords with APC connectors are not supported. All cables and cable assemblies used must be compliant with the standards specified in the standards section"

Thank you, but my question is that I have a single mode fiber patch cord with LC/APC connector while cisco stating a note that only use LC/PC or LC/UPC type of connectors with SFP+ transceiver.
So what type of transceiver should I use to connect LC/APC patch cord to cisco switches? Is there another type or SFP+ still can be used?

Cisco Catalyst 2955 Causes Some Devices to "Die" During Boot

I posted this question in the LAN section of the forums, but I realize this is probably the proper forum for my question.
I have recently purchased a Cisco Catalyst model WS-2955C-12 switch. During POST (boot), the console reports that the switch undergoes what is known as a "FRONT-END LOOPBACK TEST". During this test the 14 port lights on the device light up amber for a moment, connectivity is lost, and after a second or two the lights go off and connectivity returns. We've found that the moment the lights go off at the end of this test, if we have a specific device (with a specific ethernet chip) directly connected to the switch the ethernet chip is adversely affected by this test - the device "goes dark" and is not capable of communicating with anything (including other switches, routers, etc...) until it is power-cycled. What exactly does this FRONT-END LOOPBACK TEST do (I know it's for validating the ports for hardware defects), and what does it send across the wire that could be causing my ethernet chip onboard the device to go bonkers?
Thanks!
-Danny

The ethernet chip on the device (the device is a National Instruments product) is an STMicro STE10/100E, and I'm fairly confident I now know what's happening but I don't know why.
When my ethernet chip is in Autonegotiate mode, the "FRONT-END LOOPBACK TEST" performed by the catalyst does something where, at the conclusion of the test, the ethernet chip goes into an autonegotiation state and never comes back out of it. I'm thinking the "FRONT-END LOOPBACK TEST" is sending something across the wire that's confusing this specific ethernet chip; I've tried 3 Intel parts and also a Broadcom part and they rode it out in autonegotiation mode just fine. If I put the STE chip into a manually-configured mode the "FRONT-END LOOPBACK TEST" doesn't cause it to "go dark".
So, my question is really what does the FRONT-END LOOPBACK TEST do? Does it perform a remote loopback test (the STE10/100E doesn't support loopback tests)?
-Danny

Ask the Expert: Layer 2 Security on Cisco Catalyst Platforms

With Wilson Bonilla
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about about issues in designing, planning, and implementing Layer 2 security in your LAN network with expert Wilson Bonilla.
Wilson will cover topics that network engineers face daily such as Spanning Tree Protocol security, private VLANs, IP source guard, protected ports, dynamic ARP inspection, virtual LAN access-control lists (VLAN ACLs), and Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) snooping over Cisco Catalyst platforms. With the fast growth of networks, Layer 2 security is even more critical in the LAN to help your network become more reliable, efficient, and secure. Wilson will answer your questions about LAN networks with Cisco Catalyst switches.
Wilson Bonilla is a technical networking trainer at the Learning and Development Department for Cisco Technical Assistance Center located in Costa Rica. Before joining the Training Department, he worked for the Cisco TAC as a customer support engineer focused on LAN Switching for more than two years. While working on LAN switching, Wilson also had roles such as technical leader and trainer, adding to his area of expertise in Cisco Catalyst Layer 2 switching. He has CCNP routing and switching certification and is currently studying to achieve his CCNA certification in data center.
Remember to use the rating system to let Wilson know if you've received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Wilson might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Network Infrastructure community, subcommunity, LAN, Switching and Routing, shortly after the event. This event lasts through November, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and those of other Cisco Support Community members.

Hello NetNavi.
Check the post above about MacSec for more information and let me know if you need further clarification, if so I will do my best,
In regards to best practices there is a Cisco document; it describes deployments and best practices in every scenario; Supplicants, authenticator, authentication services and other configurations. Please check it out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6638/deploy_guide_c17-663760.html
In regards to Private VLANS:
What is a Private Vlan?
A private Vlan is a way to isolate hosts within the same Vlan or broadcast domain. So even when you might have devices sharing the same broadcast domain they can be isolated, this isolated is configured based on sub-domains also most often called primary and secondary Vlans.
What is a primary Vlan?
The primary Vlan is representation of the private Vlan, a primary Vlan has one or more secondary Vlans, a switch uses the primary Vlan to present traffic from the secondary Vlans to its neighboring devices.
What is a secondary Vlan?
A secondary Vlan is a sub-domain of the primary Vlan. We could say that the secondary Vlans belongs to the primary. The must be associated to a primary Vlan. There are two types of secondary vlans: Isolated and Community secondary Vlans.
What does it happen to host within a secondary isolated Vlan?
Host within the isolated vlan; can’t communicate to neither other host in the same isoalted vlan nor host in a community vlan.
What does it happen to host within the secondary community Vlan?
Host within the community Vlan can communicate with other host assigned to the same community vlan, but they can’t talk to host in other community vlans.
What are the benefits of implementing private Vlans?
Scalability: The most common scenario is a service provider. Imagine all customers of a service provider connected through DSL, cable modem… it’s very likely that all customers belong to the same broadcast domain, however if that’s the case why is it that I can’t use my neighbor’s printer, or maybe why is it that I can’t access the files he has store in his computer, (security) we are in the same broadcast shouldn’t I be able to at least ping his ip address?. Well that’s because the ISP must guarantee some type of security for their customers, and because put every single customer that they have in a single Vlan is not scalable they use private Vlans.
Examples:
ISP use private vlans to protect from security bridges, Private vlans and isolated Vlans are used to protect personal information for example from one customer to another.
DMZ; Many implementations utilizes private vlans in a DMZ to limt or minimize that risk of a compromised server.
I would like to share this documentation with you for further information and configuration guidelines
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk814/technologies_configuration_example09186a008017acad.shtml#hw
This document explains what Cisco Catalyst switches support Private Vlans.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note09186a0080094830.shtml
Let me know if you have further questions.
Regards
Wilson B.

CISCO CATALYST 4507R+E + Supervisor 8-E

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for