Cisco ESW 520 in Cisco LMS

Hi,
I have a question whether CicoWorks LMS can manage Cisco ESW 520 SWITCHS.
I can import it in RME but it says unknown device.
Thanks
Ashley

No, these switches are not supported by LMS.  These switches are designed to be managed by the Cisco Network Assistant.

Similar Messages

  • Port suspended on Cisco ESW-520-24P

    Hi experts,
    I appreciate if anyone can help me with this. I just bought 4 units of Cisco ESW-520 24Ports switches. I did some testing and found out for PORTS 1 and 12 is in "Suspended" mode and thus not able to use.
    This not happened to 1 but all 4 switches. Why is this so ? Can anyone guide me to disable the ports from going into "suspended" mode automatically ? I wouldn't want the ports to be in "Suspension" mode when it goes live and thus block the desktops from having internet access.
    Thanks!

    Ok, I think I found out what the priblem is.  It seems that from factory, the ports come locked.  You have to go to Security>Traffic Control>Port Security and unlock each port.  Click the EDIT tab on the port you want to edit.  Then un-check the ENABLE TRAP> (apply).  Un-check LOCK INTERFACE> (apply).  Change LEARNING MODE to CLASSIC LOCK> (apply).  That should do it, but you'll have to do that for every port you want unlocked.  I'm not to sure if there is a way to unlock then all at once.
    Daniel

  • CAM-Table over SNMP(ESW-520-48P)

    Hi everyone,
    I could need some help with our Cisco ESW-520-48P Switches. I want to read the CAM-Table over SNMP and assign each interface the appropiate client device. The problem is that I don't really know how to achive that. I've tested some different MIBs but I can't get the infos which I need.
    Thank you very much in forward!

    I need to decide on few things
    regarding this switch before recommending this switch to my customer. I
    have the following questions that i need some expert advice.
    Questions
    1.)
    Does this switch support POE 15.4W on all 48 10/100 ports
    (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total power rating of this switch is only 370W
    and if this divided with 48 ports, each port can only drive 7W. So thus
    the confusion.
    2.) Can the ESW Series be Monitored and Managed using Ciscoworks LMS?
    3.) Is MGBSX1 compatible with GLC-SX-MM
    Thanks.
    Hi,
    Please see the attached document for your queries !!
    Hope to Help !!
    Ganesh.H
    Remember to rate the helpful post

  • ESW-520-24-K9 and Cisco Network Assistant

    HI,
    Is this switch model ESW-520-24-K9 is supported by Cisco Network Assistant.
    In the leatest release notes of CNA are supported Catalyst Express 520 Series Switches and this model WS-CE520-24TT-K9 is on the supported list.
    But the mention model above is EoL and the new one is ESW-520-24-K9.
    Thanks,
    Kamil

    Hi Dave,
    Thanks for your replay.
    Yes, you are right that this switch model is supported by CCA but not by Cisco Network Assistant.
    These programs are different in functionality.
    The situation has become clearer, since the customer bought the Cisco Catalyst 2960 series switch.
    Kamil

  • Help Setting up a Cisco SA 520

    I am trying to setup a Cisco SA 520 for VPN access to my network from outside locations. I am unsure what I need to do to set this up.
    I currently have an Adtran 3430 Router with an External IP: 63.232.147.x. I have a 2003 Server which hands out DHCP addresses to workstations of 192.168.1.x. My external IP addresses are 207.109.23.x. There are some 207.109.23.x numbers being natted to some 192 numbers on the Adtran, that is about the only thing the Adtran is doing. We use the Adtran to connect to the internet as well. My ISP controls the Adtran, I cannot get to the config, so any changes need to be done by them.
    The static IP address I'd like to use for this SA 520 is 65.117.45.x 255.255.255.248. I just got a block of IPs from my ISP, so I know I have the 65.117.45.x available to use.
    I'm not sure what I should be using for a gateway IP address and DNS address under IPv4 WAN configuration page?
    I'm also not sure where the SA 520 phycially goes? Right now, I have a cable coming out of the Adtran ETH 0/2 into the WAN port on SA 520. But when all is said and done, will the outside traffic hit the SA 520 first or the Adtran? I'm assuming I'll need to redo my NAT statements on the SA 520 instead of the Adtran?
    If anyone can offer any advice, it would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi Todd,
    Is it possible to disable the NAT on Adtran 3430 and
    Let SA500 do the NAT.
    thanks
    Wei

  • Connecting two cisco ESW 500 series switches.

    Hi Experts,
    I have a basic knowledge of network and need some help.
    I have two cisco ESW 500 series switches and i want to connect them together.
    Q1 # Which type of cable i should use to connect these two switches CrossOver or fiber...What is the advantage of using Fiber over CrossOver. ?
    Q2 # What are the marked ports in the image used for...???

    tech spec,
    Traditionally you would use crossover to connect switches. Most modern network devices have Auto-MDIX which allows the device to connect using either crossover or straight through.
    The ports on the right can be used for uplink or as regular network ports. On the 10/100 versions the ports on the right are usually Gigabit, thus making them more suitable for uplink to another switch, etc.
    Please mark this thread as answered or reply if you have any additional questions.
    - Marty

  • ESW 520 QoS questions

    Hello,
    just to put this out there, I am a noob to the world of Cisco, just got my CCNA, and am now working as an intern.
    Can you set esw 520 switches to use auto QoS?  We are putting the 520's into an environment of more configurable catalyst switches, and they all use auto QoS.  I am basically wondering how to get the QoS on the 520's to play nice with the auto qos on the nicer catalyst switches...
    I have tried just using basic QoS, but that wont work, because when I use the port wizard, I use the macro "ip phone + desktop"
    It insists on setting qos, but fails because voice-map does not exists.  The only way I have found to get the macro to work, is to set QoS to advanced, and create a policy map called "voice-map"  of course, after that the macro works, but then I am left with advanced QoS enabled, and hardly configured...how am I supposed to know how to configure it if the other switches ( catalyst series) are set to auto?
    Im sorry for the seemingly dumb question, but I know next to nothing about QoS other than it is used to prioitize traffic based on data types.

    Hey cole, typically with theses switches the smartports will do the QOS with the port role, however you can manually create the QOS for the switch, by creating a ACL to identify the specific traffic comming through the switch port.  Then Create a class map/ policy map/ and then bind it to the ports your wanting to setup QOS on.

  • ESW 520 8-port PoE switch cannot ping

    Hello
    I have an ESW 520 8-Port switch with a management ip address of 192.168.10.2 /24
    After I reboot it, I can successfully ping it from a pc with an ip of 192.168.10.123 for about 50 consecutive times.
    After that, I get a "Destination host unreachable" (this icmp message is sent by my pinging pc (192.168.10.123).
    This obviously seems like a bug.
    Has anybody seen this before.
    Whenever I reboot it, it goes through the same sequence.
    Thanksj

    Hi David,
    I figured out what the problem was.
    The switch was obtaining an ip via dhcp, as it is a DCHP client by default.
    I am used to working with Enterprise level Cisco equipment, so this simple oversight was the cause of the problem.
    The ip that was obtained via dhcp was obviously different than the default ip of 192.168.10.2
    So when the switch was rebooted, it would start off with its default ip of 192.168.10.2.
    As soon as it obtained an ip via dhcp, I could not ping it of course
    Thanks for the  input though

  • ESW-520-24-K9 supperted SFPs

    Hello,
    I am interesting is ESW-520-24-K9 switche supports GLC-LH-SM SFP ?
    In  official data sheet there is no information about that. Some guys out there were speaking  that it is supported and I am interesting if it is true ?

    I hate the idea of running 9um single mode SFP on a multimodal cable 50 or 62.5th fiber core.
    I have never used it , but I would guess if you must  run SM SFP over MM fiber, there may be a mode conditioning cable to allow that mating.
    I have seen within Cisco the mention of using SM SFP over multimode. I am unconvinced by that application.
    I personally will not validate running SM SFP over a MM cable. My colleagues may disagree.
    I welcome any input to your application from other folks on the community.
    Regards dave

  • Can't Console into ESW-520-24P Switch, Need help.

    Hi,
    We have 3 ESW-520-24P series switches.
    I can not console them because by default they have a security profile attached into it for "Console Only" and It is set as "Deny".
    I can't modify or delete it because it's a default security policy.
    We can do console into ESW-540-24P series switches without any problems.
    Can someone share any solutions to gain console access for these switches?
    Any one from Cisco TAC support?
    Thanks in advance.
    Mansur.

    Hi Devicarr,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I can set the VLAN and Management IP address using the web interfaces.
    But when I am trying to connect it via console it is not responding. I reset it to factory default and then found from the web control panel/interface that the switch has an "Access Authentication" under that it has a "Access Profile" and the profile has a default or built in profile attached says "Console Only" and it has a rule like "IP Source = 0.0.0.0/32 Permit = Deny".
    I tried to delete or modify it even I tried to add a new rule to allow the console access but failed.
    Does this switch series "ESW-520-24P" by default Console disabled when manufactured or ELSE? Please provide me your valuable suggestions.
    Thanks in advance.
    Mansur.

  • Cisco Prime network and cisco prime infrastructure

    Hi,
    What is the difference between Cisco Prime Network and Cisco Prime infrastructure.
    Please advice.

    I assume you are asking about Cisco Prime LAN Management System (LMS) vs. Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI).
    LMS is currently the leading Cisco offering for wired infrastructure management. It is the evolution of the earlier CiscoWorks LMS, CiscoWorks RWAN CiscoWorks 2000, CWSI, VLAN Director, original CiscoWorks classic etc. products going back almost 20 years.
    PI is the equivalent Cisco offering for wireless LANs and is the successor to NCS and WCS products.
    The overlap and confusion comes from the fact the Cisco is positioning PI as the overall wireless and wired management platform and gradually introducing wired network management features to make it equal (and eventually exceed) LMS's capabilities.
    There is a comparison table here that shows the current differences. A major new release of PI (2.0) is due out shortly which will close many (but not all) of the gaps on that table.

  • Small Business- ESW-520-48P-K9

    I need to decide on few things regarding this switch before recommending this switch to my customer. I have the following questions that i need some expert advice.
    Questions
    1.) Does this switch support POE 15.4W on all 48 10/100 ports (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total power rating of this switch is only 370W and if this divided with 48 ports, each port can only drive 7W. So thus the confusion.
    2.)
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
    Can the ESW Series be Monitored and Managed using Ciscoworks LMS?
    3.) Is MGBSX1 compatible with GLC-SX-MM
    Thanks.

    I need to decide on few things
    regarding this switch before recommending this switch to my customer. I
    have the following questions that i need some expert advice.
    Questions
    1.)
    Does this switch support POE 15.4W on all 48 10/100 ports
    (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total power rating of this switch is only 370W
    and if this divided with 48 ports, each port can only drive 7W. So thus
    the confusion.
    2.) Can the ESW Series be Monitored and Managed using Ciscoworks LMS?
    3.) Is MGBSX1 compatible with GLC-SX-MM
    Thanks.
    Hi,
    Please see the attached document for your queries !!
    Hope to Help !!
    Ganesh.H
    Remember to rate the helpful post

  • Wireless Internet Access (Cisco IP NGN or Cisco Wireless Mesh Networkin)??

    Dear Cisco Wireless Team
    Please educate us on where to start, or the CISCO product we might need to purchase
    We are trying to branch out a new Internet wireless access and wireless phone service business in our company, and presently looking for the right Cisco product solution to purchase to enable us offer this service in LAGOS, NIGERIA.
    The service will be rendered in Africa, the country NIGERIA, and the city LAGOS.
    We would like to mount or install the product in Lagos, Nigeria.
    As we are new to this kind of service. We would appreciate if the Cisco wireless team can work with us in pointing or directing on the right product to purchase and what are required. We understand the Cisco Wireless Mesh Networking Solution, Cisco IP Generation Network, Cisco 12416 or 7600 Series Router might be the right products to purchase, but we are not sure on what needed or what are required to meet our service need.
    Possibly we would like to offer Wireless Internet Access to unlimited subscribers, and also Wireless or Mobile Phone service to unlimited subscribers in Nigeria.
    Anticipating your reply

    I suppose Cisco Wireless Mesh Networking would be a good choice.The Cisco mesh architecture makes it easy to scale coverage as capacity needs dictate, including increasing access point density; adding wired connections, controllers, and radios; and using dual high-powered, high-sensitive radios and a selection of high-gain antennas.Refer the document for IP NGN in the following URL http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns537/networking_solutions_solution_category.html

  • ESW 520 802.1x MAB authentication problem

    Hello,
    I am having problem with 802.1x MAB authentication on ESW 520 switch, the authentication server is ACS 5.3.
    The Authentication method on ESW is 802.1x & MAC, and Host Authentication mode is Multi Session. When i plug ip phone it never authenticate the phone, and on ACS I get following error message:
    Radius authentication failed for USER: aa1effbb8fd4  MAC: aa-1E-FF-bb-8F-D4  AUTHTYPE:  Radius authentication failed
    RADIUS Status:Authentication failed    : 11509 Access Service does not allow any EAP protocols
    15004  Matched rule
    15012  Selected Access Service - MAB
    11507  Extracted EAP-Response/Identity
    11509  Access Service does not allow any EAP protocols
    11504  Prepared EAP-Failure
    11003  Returned RADIUS Access-Reject
    For that Access Service I have configured only Host Lookup.
    The same ACS configuration is working perfectly on Catalyst 3560G switche.
    It seems that ESW switch is not telling ACS that authentication is going to be by MAC address.
    Do you have any idea what can be the problem.

    Are you hitting the same selection rule? Also is "mab eap" configured globally on the switch, or on the port itself?
    Also can you post the port configuration and the show ver of the ESW?
    Thanks,
    Tarik Admani
    *Please rate helpful posts*

  • ESW 520 802.1x re authentication problem

    Hello
    I have problem with ESW 520, on 802.1x authentication. The problem is when host authenticates successfully it works about couple of minutes, after it truest too authenticate again but it lags. On network interface it shows notification that if Failed authentication. On ACS I see only one authentication attempt which is successful. This problem is happening on Win7 and Win XP. If I unplug and plug cable it authenticates successfully, but then about couple of minutes it again lags. Switch sees port as authenticated. On Win7 event viewer I have following error:
                    Reason: 0x70004
                    Reason Text: The network stopped answering authentication requests
                    Error Code: 0x0
    If I connect same hosts on Catalyst 2960 switch, they work successfully.

    Hi  ngtransge
    There are  tree possible explanations about  why the authentications  fails.
    A)the network interface is shut down after failed computer authentication. You can see this on the switch as line protocol down for that port.
    To verify the client has a domain certificate:
    1. Click Start and click Run.
    2. Type mmc, and then press ENTER.
    3. On the File menu, click Add/Remove Snap-in.
    4. Click Certificates, click Add, select Computer account, and then click Next.
    5. Verify that Local computer: (the computer this console is running on) is selected, click Finish, and then click OK.
    6. In the console tree, double-click Certificates (Local Computer), double-click Personal, and then click Certificates.
    On a domain joined client, you should see a certificate here with Intended Purposes of Client Authentication. Make sure this certificate is not expired. If it is expired, you will need to regain connection to your CA to request a new one.
    B) You should check your switch's configuration, perhaps a port or some ports could be blocked by an access-list and interrupt the re authentication.
    C) If this two solutions don't work, you have to try to change the authentication method (PEAP-MSCHAPv2 or PEAP-EAP-TLS)
    Greetings, Johnnatn Rodriguez Miranda

Maybe you are looking for