Cisco ISE Proxy loggs?

Hi There,
Iam runinng an ISE 1.2 U5.Since a while, i cannot receive any feed service, posture or provisioning updates.
Does the ISE provide a logg file for proxy connections to feed services?
CCNP R&S

Inorder to have feed services activated, make sure you have advance license. Please follow the feed service configuration from below link ( detail )
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_prof_pol.html#wp2013877

Similar Messages

Cisco ISE - radius proxy

Hi,
Is the following possible:
- let the ISE do the authentication and then proxy to another radius server which does the authorization.
At the moment we have a freeradius server that does the following:
1) authenticates 802.1x requests (eap-tls)
2) during authorization the server checks an external database that determines the vlan that should be returned (in radius attribute) based on originating switch and/or mac address.
I am checking if I can migrate to ISE but then the above would have to work.
For MAB I can easily do authentication/authorization on freeradius so I will proxy MAB requests to there.
regards
Thomas

ISE acts as a RADIUS proxy server by proxying the requests from a network access device (NAD) to a RADIUS server. The RADIUS server processes the request and returns the result to Cisco ISE. Cisco ISE then sends the response to the NAD
FYI
you can use the RADIUS server sequences to proxy the requests to a RADIUS server.
The RADIUS server sequence strips the domain name from the RADIUS-Username attribute for RADIUS authentications. This domain stripping is not applicable for EAP authentications, which use the EAP-Identity attribute. The RADIUS proxy server obtains the username from the RADIUS-Username attribute and strips it from the character that you specify when you configure the RADIUS server sequence. For EAP authentications, the RADIUS proxy server obtains the username from the EAP-Identity attribute. EAP authentications that use the RADIUS server sequence will succeed only if the EAP-Identity and RADIUS-Username values are the same.

Cisco ISE 1.2 Patch 6 -- 8 Update failed

Hi all,
I wanted to know if any bugs was registered for the cumulative patch 8 for Cisco ISE 1.2 and how to mitigate any patch failures.
Important notice : I though that this error could be an unlucky try but i've tested the update two time.
Indeed, i have three deployment : A Pre-production one, a 4 nodes distributed and a 2 nodes distributed.
The patch works fine on the pre-production one, on the 2 nodes too but fails on the 4 nodes one with a very anormal behaviour.
On the "show nodes status" in Maintenance - Patch manage, i can see that my both PAN are successfully patched and the first PSN too but when the "Patch in progress" appears on the second PSN, the "installed" status is cancelled in the first PSN and become "Patch in progress" so i've two "Patch in progress" in parallel, that is an anormal procedure not discribed by Cisco on the document "Installing a software Patch". (wich discribe a sequential update of all nodes)
The symptoms after this error are :
- Unable to process EAP-TLS authentications ! (CA are stored on the First PAN and seems to be unavailable from PSN to exchange the handshake)
- The Application server try to restart but fails indefinitly even if i try to restart the node (on both PSN)
- GUI Unavailable
- MAB Auth is working
- Endpoint and Endpoint Groups menus are missing on the GUI (I push the MAC Address through the ERS API but it is very strange)
- Logs indicates one first "Patch success" on PAN and a second "Patch failed" still on PAN :(
The task that resolves this issue is to launch the command "patch remove ise 8" on all nodes and everything come back functional.
My big interrogation is that on my two other deployment, the patch was successfull and quick to process.
Thanks for your help.

This is that i did abviously... but the two PSN stay in status "Node down", the application service won't start correctly with these ADE-OS logs entries :
2014-05-28T10:26:30.023223+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: info:[application:operation:appservercontrol.sh] Starting ISE Application Server...
2014-05-28T10:26:30.311676+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: Loading PKCS11 ...
2014-05-28T10:26:30.978432+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
2014-05-28T10:26:30.978454+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: SLF4J: Found binding in [jar:file:/opt/CSCOcpm/appsrv/apache-tomcat-6.0.36/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.5.8.jar!/org/slf4j/im
pl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
2014-05-28T10:26:30.978502+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: SLF4J: Found binding in [jar:file:/opt/CSCOcpm/appsrv/apache-tomcat-6.0.36/lib/com.cisco.xmp.osgi.slf4j-log4j12-1.5.
8.PATCHED.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
2014-05-28T10:26:30.978509+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an explanation.
2014-05-28T10:26:31.638970+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (com.cisco.epm.config.cache.impl.ConfigCacheImpl).
2014-05-28T10:26:31.638992+00:00 XXXXXXX logger: log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.

Cisco ISE with both internal and External RADIUS Server

Hi
I have ISE 1.2 , I configured it as management monitor and PSN and it work fine
I would like to know if I can integrate an external radius server and work with both internal and External RADIUS Server simultanously
So some computer (groupe_A in active directory ) will continu to made radius authentication on the ISE internal radius and other computer (groupe_B in active directory) will made radius authentication on an external radius server
I will like to know if it is possible to configure it and how I can do it ?
Thanks in advance for your help
Regards
Blaise

Cisco ISE can function both as a RADIUS server and as a RADIUS proxy server. When it acts as a proxy server, Cisco ISE receives authentication and accounting requests from the network access server (NAS) and forwards them to the external RADIUS server. Cisco ISE accepts the results of the requests and returns them to the NAS.
Cisco ISE can simultaneously act as a proxy server to multiple external RADIUS servers. You can use the external RADIUS servers that you configure here in RADIUS server sequences. The External RADIUS Server page lists all the external RADIUS servers that you have defined in Cisco ISE. You can use the filter option to search for specific RADIUS servers based on the name or description, or both. In both simple and rule-based authentication policies, you can use the RADIUS server sequences to proxy the requests to a RADIUS server.
The RADIUS server sequence strips the domain name from the RADIUS-Username attribute for RADIUS authentications. This domain stripping is not applicable for EAP authentications, which use the EAP-Identity attribute. The RADIUS proxy server obtains the username from the RADIUS-Username attribute and strips it from the character that you specify when you configure the RADIUS server sequence. For EAP authentications, the RADIUS proxy server obtains the username from the EAP-Identity attribute. EAP authentications that use the RADIUS server sequence will succeed only if the EAP-Identity and RADIUS-Username values are the same.

Cisco ISE with multiple Network interface

Hello,
I am deploying Cisco ISE 1.2 in a distributed deployment and the requirement is to use external Radius proxy feature. ISE PSNs are designed to have 2 L3 NIC's, Eth0 for administration and Eth1 as client side facing NIC for Radius requests. I am interested to know would Cisco ISE in version 1.2 use Eth1 interface to send RADIUS authentication request to external RADIUS Proxy server.
Could not find above information in Cisco SNS-3400 Series Appliance Ports Reference.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/installation_guide/ise_app_c-ports.html
Thanks
Kumar

Thanks Ahmad for the reply.
Cisco ISE uses standard RADIUS authentication and authorization port to send request to Exteranl RADIUS proxy. As per the interface/port refrence guide of version 1.2 this is listed that is causing a confusion :-
Eth0
Eth1
Eth2
Eth3
Policy Service node
Session
•UDP:1645, 1812 (RADIUS Authentication)
•UDP:1646, 1813 (RADIUS Accounting)
•UDP: 1700 (RADIUS change of authorization Send)
•UDP: 1700, 3799 (RADIUS change of authorization Listen/Relay)
External Identity Stores
and Resources
•TCP: 389, 3268, UDP: 389 (LDAP)
•TCP: 445 (SMB)
•TCP: 88, UDP: 88 (KDC)
•TCP: 464 (KPASS)
•UDP: 123 (NTP)
•TCP: 53, UDP: 53 (DNS)
(Admin user interface authentication and endpoint authentication)
In external Identity Stores and Resources it says Eth0 is used for (Admin user interface authentication and endpoint authentication), where under sessions it lists that all ports can be used for RADIUS Authentication and Authorization.
I am not sure what I am missing to understand between the two if you can highlight that.
Thanks
Kumar

Cisco ISE guests and Ironport

Hi All,
I'm currently writing a HLD for a Cisco ISE rollout in my organization, and I've come across sort-of-an-issue:
I'm planning on getting the guests in through the ISE Guest portal, but I also want to push them through an authenticated proxy(for accounting purposes) instead of a transparent one... however, I can't seem to find a way to somehow integrate Ironport and ISE in order to achieve some sort of an SSO, to avoid users having to enter their credentials twice(guest portal and ironport)- has anyone got a working solution for this?
Any constructive input appreciated!
Thanks!

Thanks for the swift responses and suggestions!
I'll most certainly have a look at the proposals...
However, I still want the guest users to go through the S370, as it's not only for accounting purposes, but I want them to authenticate, since it would make tracing and pinning events to a person way easier - that's the main reason why I'm trying to find a solution that might act like an SSO. The business side stated that signing in twice(ISE guest portal, then proxy) is unacceptable. I know that there's no direct integration between ISE and Ironport at the moment, and I am going to put in a feature request for that, but for the time being, I am really keen on getting this to work somehow...
BTW - I'm currently using a virtualised ISE, release 1.1.4., And I've got the 3395's on order...

Cisco ISE some Radius issues

Dear guys,
     I deployed Cisco ISE for Network Access Control. My topology as described as attached image. I configured Cisco ISE as Radius Server for Client Access Control. But, I got some problems such as:
No Accounting Start. (I have configured accouting on Switch 2960).
Radius Request Dropped (attached image). These NAS IP Address are Servers on same subnet with Cisco ISE.
I would greatly appreciate any help you can give me in working this problem.
Have a nice day,
Thanks and Regrads,

Sorry for late reply.
Here is my switch config.
Current configuration : 8630 bytes
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Switch
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no logging console
enable password ******************
aaa new-model
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
aaa authorization network default group radius
aaa authorization auth-proxy default group radius
aaa accounting delay-start all
aaa accounting auth-proxy default start-stop group radius
aaa accounting dot1x default start-stop group radius
aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius
aaa server radius dynamic-author
client A.B.C.D server-key keystrings
aaa session-id common
system mtu routing 1500
vtp mode transparent
ip dhcp snooping
ip device tracking
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-447922560
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-447922560
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-447922560
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-447922560
certificate self-signed 01
xxxxx
dot1x system-auth-control
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
vlan 139,153,401-402,999,1501-1502
interface FastEthernet0/11
switchport access vlan 139
switchport mode access
authentication host-mode multi-auth
authentication open
authentication port-control auto
authentication periodic
authentication timer inactivity 180
authentication violation restrict
mab
interface FastEthernet0/12
switchport access vlan 139
switchport mode access
ip access-group ACL-ALLOW in
authentication event fail action next-method
authentication event server dead action authorize vlan 139
authentication event server alive action reinitialize
authentication host-mode multi-auth
authentication open
authentication order dot1x mab
authentication priority dot1x mab
authentication port-control auto
authentication periodic
authentication timer reauthenticate server
authentication timer inactivity 180
authentication violation restrict
mab
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 10
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
interface Vlan1
no ip address
interface Vlan139
ip address E.F.G.H 255.255.255.0
ip default-gateway I.J.K.L
ip http server
ip http secure-server
ip access-list extended ACL-ALLOW
permit ip any any
ip access-list extended ACL-DEFAULT
remark Allow DHCP
permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps
remark Allow DNS
permit udp any any eq domain
permit icmp any any
permit tcp any host A.B.C.D eq 8443
permit tcp any host A.B.C.D eq 443
permit tcp any host A.B.C.D eq www
permit tcp any host A.B.C.D eq 8905
permit tcp any host A.B.C.D eq 8909
permit udp any host A.B.C.D eq 8905
permit udp any host A.B.C.D eq 8909
deny   ip any any
ip access-list extended ACL-WEBAUTH-REDIRECT
permit tcp any any eq www
permit tcp any any eq 443
deny   ip any any
ip radius source-interface Vlan139
snmp-server community keystrings RW
snmp-server enable traps snmp linkdown linkup
snmp-server enable traps mac-notification change move
snmp-server host A.B.C.D version 2c keystrings mac-notification
radius-server attribute 6 on-for-login-auth
radius-server attribute 8 include-in-access-req
radius-server attribute 25 access-request include
radius-server dead-criteria time 5 tries 3
radius-server host A.B.C.D auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key STRINGSKEY
radius-server vsa send accounting
radius-server vsa send authentication
line con 0
line vty 5 15
end
My switch version is
WS-2960 12.2(55)SE5 C2960-LANBASEK9-M
I would greatly appreciate any help you can give me in working this problem.

Cisco ISE with EAP-FAST and PAC provisioning

Hi,
I have search with no result on this topic. So, Does anyone have implemented Cisco ISE authentication with EAP-FAST and PAC provisioning ?
Since I have an issue with internal proxy, user required to authenticate with an internal proxy before granting access to the internet.
If you have any documents, it would be appreciated for me.
Thanks,
Pongsatorn

From what I understand a Internet proxy PAC and a eap-fast PAC are two different purposes.
Is that what you are trying to get clarification on.
Basically eap fast PAC provisioning is a PAC that s provisioned when a client authenticates successfully. The client provides this PAC for network authentication and not proxy authentication.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Cisco ISE: External RADIUS Server

Hi,
I would like to forward RADIUS from PSN to another PSN. I already defined "External RADIUS Servers".
So, how can I use this external RADIUS server to process my request ?
Looking at the user guide but didn't find any information about this setting (For rule based not simple rule)
If anyone use this, please suggest this to me.
Thanks,
Pongsatorn

Defining an External RADIUS Server
The Cisco Cisco ISE can function both as a RADIUS server and as a RADIUS proxy server. When it acts as a proxy server, the Cisco Cisco ISE receives authentication and accounting requests from the network access server (NAS) and forwards them to the external RADIUS server. The Cisco Cisco ISE accepts the results of the requests and returns them to the NAS. You must configure the external RADIUS servers in the Cisco Cisco ISE to enable it to forward requests to the external RADIUS servers. You can define the timeout period and the number of connection attempts.
The Cisco Cisco ISE can simultaneously act as a proxy server to multiple external RADIUS servers. You can use the external RADIUS servers that you configure here in RADIUS server sequences. This External RADIUS Server page lists all the external RADIUS servers that you have defined in Cisco Cisco ISE. You can use the filter option to search for specific RADIUS servers based on the name or description or both.
To create an external RADIUS server, complete the following steps:
Step 1 Choose Administration > Network Resources > External RADIUS Servers.
The RADIUS Servers page appears with a list of external RADIUS servers that are defined in Cisco ISE.
Step 2 Click Add to add an external RADIUS server.
Step 3 Enter the values as described:
•Name—(Required) Enter the name of the external RADIUS server.
•Description—Enter a description of the external RADIUS server.
•Host IP—(Required) Enter the IP address of the external RADIUS server.
•Shared Secret—(Required) Enter the shared secret between Cisco Cisco ISE and the external RADIUS server that is used for authenticating the external RADIUS server. A shared secret is an expected string of text that a user must provide to enable the network device to authenticate a username and password. The connection is rejected until the user supplies the shared secret. The shared secret can be up to 128 characters in length.
•Enable KeyWrap—This option increases RADIUS protocol security via an AES KeyWrap algorithm, to help enable FIPS 140-2 compliance in Cisco ISE.
•Key Encryption Key—This key is used for session encryption (secrecy).
•Message Authenticator Code Key—This key is used for keyed HMAC calculation over RADIUS messages.
•Key Input Format—Specify the format you want to use to enter the Cisco ISE FIPS encryption key, so that it matches the configuration that is available on the WLAN controller. (The value you specify must be the correct [full] length for the key as defined below—shorter values are not permitted.)
–ASCII—The Key Encryption Key must be 16 characters (bytes) long, and the Message Authenticator Code Key must be 20 characters (bytes) long.
–Hexadecimal—The Key Encryption Key must be 32 bytes long, and the Message Authenticator Code Key must be 40 bytes long.
•Authentication Port—(Required) Enter the RADIUS authentication port number. The valid range is from 1 to 65535. The default is 1812.
•Accounting Port—(Required) Enter the RADIUS accounting port number. The valid range is from 1 to 65535. The default is 1813.
•Server Timeout—(Required) Enter the number of seconds that the Cisco Cisco ISE waits for a response from the external RADIUS server. The default is 5 seconds. Valid values are from 5 to 120.
•Connection Attempts—(Required) Enter the number of times that the Cisco Cisco ISE attempts to connect to the external RADIUS server. The default is 3 attempts. Valid values are from 1 to 9.
Step 4 Click Submit to save the external RADIUS server configuration.

Cisco ISE auth alternatives

Hi everyone,
I'm a beginner with cisco ISE, and I have a very special case that may occur frequently in my situation ...
In normal case, the client exchanges EAP messages with the switch, and the switch acts as a proxy server regarding the ISE server.
My special case is when the connectivity between ISE and the switch is lost, the easiyest alternative is to redirect the client to the auth-fail VLAN. but this alternative is not productive (regarding our needs) ...
Is there any alternatives for this case of study. this is very urgent please.
Thank you for your support.

Hello a.benhima,
You can change the timer or disable re-authentication.
Here is a link to another posting that discusses the authentication timer.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11971961/ise-authentication-timers-issues
Hope this helps.

Cisco phone proxy will support on cucm 8.6 or not

Hi as per document i can see that Cisco phone proxy . Without using vpn connect . Customer want to keep configured Cucm on there Jabber or cisco mobile on the iphone and need to get connected when ever they have an internet access .
And also by keeping a small end router at branches havin only one cisco phone needs to connect to the corprate office using proxy.
Is that possible and also is it possible on 8.6 cucm version . Here am just attaching a document info which says version supported
Supported Cisco UCM and IP Phones for the Phone Proxy
Cisco Unified Communications Manager
The following release of the Cisco Unified Communications Manager are supported with the phone proxy:
•Cisco Unified CallManager Version 4.x
•Cisco Unified CallManager Version 5.0
•Cisco Unified CallManager Version 5.1
•Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.1
•Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.0

I understand the VPN solution is a good one, but we have already 100 proxy phones deployed and from what I read I'd need to first set up a VPN phone on the cluster before deploying it in the field. This would be difficult to do with users all over the country. Or am I missing something?
I have a question about our ASA though if anyone can answer it. We have to move from an ASA 5510 to a 5520 due to the 100 UC proxy-phone license limitation (even though we have 70 phones it appears that a UC license is taken up for each TFTP server configured on the phone - primary and secondary). When I configured the 5520 I can register new phones no problem. None of the existing phones will register until the CTL file is manually deleted on each phone. Is there a way to seamlessly migrate to the 5520? Such as using the same certs, CTL file etc.. on the 5520? When I configured it it generated it's own self-signed key and CTL file. I did import the certificates from CUCM...

Remote Access VPN posturing with Cisco ISE 1.1.1

Hi all,
we would like to start using our ISE for Remote VPN access.
We have run a proof of concept with the ISE & IPEP with a Cisco ASA5505. We got the authentication working however posturing of the client did not work.
That was a few months ago and so I was wondering whether any design document is available specifically around Using the Cisco ISE for Authenticating & Posturing Remote Access VPN clients.
I understand that version 9 of the ASA code is supposed to eliminate the need for Inline Posture, does anyone know whether this will also allow posturing too?
We do intend to by Cisco ASR's aswell, but I am sceptical of this as i do not know how many VPN licenses you get out of the box. The ASA's we have allow up to 5000 IPSec VPNs without having to purchase any licensing. What I do not want to do is to switch to SSL VPNs as this again will increase cost.
I know ISR's are support NADs but what about ASRs? There is no mention.
Any advise will be appreciated!
Mario

OK, I have come accross the Cisco Validated design for BYOD and in there it has a section about Authenticating VPNs.
thats great... however it does not mention using the Inline posture node. Does anyone know if there is a limitation using Inline Posture and SSL VPNs...?
essentially my requirements are
2-factor authentication VPN using a Certificate & RSA Token
Posturing of the VPN endpoint.
Ideally i would like to use IPSec VPNs as i have licenses already for these on my ASAs. But if it will only work with SSL & AnyConnect, then so be it.
Can anyone help?
Mario

Multiple domains authentication on Cisco ISE

Hi,
Does the current Cisco ISE supports for authenticating on multiple Active Directories ?
I can only set Cisco ISE to join on single active directory and LDAP
Does anyone have set Cisco ISE to support EAP-FAST with WPAD or PAC provisioning ?
Thanks
Pongsatorn

Hi,
We are into a situation where we need to authenticate users of two domains and these two domains are completely independent (no common DNS server). ISE is not able to resolve one of the domain using the DNS server settings and Adding a host entry for the domain name is not sufficient since Kerberos, GC and LDAP SRVs need to be resolvable as well.
From what I know ISE 1.3 should supports disjointed domains and there is no requirement for ISE to have 2 way trust relationship with domains.
Please share your experience if someone has faced similar situation before.
Regards,
Akhtar

Cisco ISE trying to posture a device that should not be able to be postured

Overview:
Cisco ISE version 1.1.4. Windows PC will be postured using Web NAC agent. Mobile devices (Apple/Android) can't be postured and will be exempted from posturing. Mobile devices will be exempted using the condition EndPoints:PostureApplicable EQUALS No. This worked fine and mobile devices will be caught by this condition while Windows device will be caught by another that sends to posturing.
Mobile device authorisation policy configured:
Problem:
A few days later, mobile devices doesn't seem to end up in the policy that has EndPoints:PostureApplicable EQUALS No. After having a look at monitoring, Cisco ISE is classifies mobile devices as Posturable. The Posture Status previously was "NotApplicable" now shows up as "Pending". See below.
Troubleshooting:
I tried a total of 4 different mobile devices. 2 Apple and 2 Android. All of them have the Posture Status of "Pending". Interestingly after a few tries, both the Androids starting working and have the PostureStatus of "NotApplicable", no configuration changes were made. The 2 Apple device still doesn't work and show up as "Pending".
I have restarted ISE, Access Point and Apple device. I have also tried other Apple device. All with the same problem.
Have any of you guys experienced this before?

Hi,
I have also experienced the same issues as yourself and would recommend opening a tac case. However I have used the device registration web portal to redirect all previous detected mobile devices to accept the aup and have them statically assigned to an endpoint group so they do not hit this scenario.
I know it is a workaround but its the only way i could get this to work and not affect devices that were one time detected as such.
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

Cisco ISE 1.2 MDM Integration Question

I have a working Cisco ISE 1.2.1 install which I've performed the integration to our MobileIron server. The "integration test" reports that the integration is good, but whenever ISE verifies MDM compliance, registration, etc.. with MobileIron when a mobile device connects it always reports that all statuses are good even if they aren't.
My test phone is out of compliance on Mobileiron because of an unapproved app, but when the phone connects ISE believes the MDM compliance status is good. I'm not sure if it isn't really checking with MDM or if the Mobileiron server is reporting erroneous results.
I also saw in a video that the phone has to be registered with MobileIron through ISE. Is this correct? I don't plan to on-board devices with MobileIron through ISE, it will be done directly through MobieIron (not connected to the Wifi network).
I only want ISE to check the compliance status of the device against MobileIron and quarantine if it isn't compliant or MDM registered.
Any help would be appreciated

Saurav and others,
Unfortunately, on-boarding sets some attribute fields on the endpoints that will then allow them to participate in a policy. It is nice that we all have MDM integration working but we almost need another class of on-boarding for corporate devices that are already in the MDM of choice (where we prefer to manage them!)
There is a little documented feature in ISE.
It appears to me that;
the on-boarding turns on the following states for the endpoint;
BYODRegistration
No ( No becomes Yes)
DeviceRegistrationStatus
NotRegistered (becomes Registered)
( The device is actually registered in MobileIron - this means did ISE register with MI. )
No MI attributes will work without this magic. TAC engineers I have dealt with don't seem to understand this feature.
This is definitely an enhancement that is needed.

Cisco ISE Proxy loggs?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for