Cisco MXE Problem

Hello all
i need help for my MXE Cluster , i have 5 X MXE 3500 and i need to do cluster between the 5 X MXE3500. I faced problems ( 2 of MXEs have 2 X VM and other 3 X MXE have 3 X VM (Virtual machines) , i need to know the difference between then and i need to get any user name & password to access MXE Web ui and how can i select Resource Manager between 5.
Thanks

If you dont want the watermark to appear then you need to go to your job profile in MXE for the SnS conversion and modify the 'pre-processor' to not add watermarks. When you say 'my new folder not shown' the MXE job will also have a distribution or Delivery profile , which is where you would specify where the output would go. You really need to log into the mxeui (http://yourserver/mxeui) and take a look at the job profile that is being used to convert, pre process and deliver your files - the answers to your questions will be there i think

Similar Messages

Cisco MXE 3500 Cluster Help

Hello
i need help for my Cisco MXE cluster . I have already installed RM license and RN licesnses and all are installed successfully. I need to know what are the next steps?. I have 1 X RM and 4 X RM , how can i add my 4 X RN to my cluster to can see RM successfully?.
Thank you

Hello Mohamed,
The main step needed after licenses are properly applied is to add each RN as a host in the RM GUI Administration.
You can actually follow the full MXE configuration tasks as documented at:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/video/mxe/3500/sw/3_x/3_3/admin/guide/tasks.html
This document is also valid for standalone deployments, but you will notice that any extra step or different step needed in clustered deployment will be added in a note starting like:
"Note In a clustered deployment..."
I hope this helps,
Marco

Remote Access VPN on Cisco ASA Problem

Hi, i configured Remote access VPN on Cisco ASA 8.x as per below configuration.
Problem is that my internet has stopped working, and default route is just showing stars.
i can ping internal server 10.110.10.150 fine , which i allowed on VPN ACL, but my other traffic not going to regular internet on my laptop,
what additional required to force my internet to go to regular internet instead of getting encrypted?
Also attaching output of route print at the point when VPN is connected.
ip local pool RA_VPN_POOL 10.1.200.100-10.1.200.150 mask 255.255.255.0
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto dynamic-map RA_VPN 65535 set transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA
crypto dynamic-map RA_VPN 65535 set security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto dynamic-map RA_VPN 65535 set security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto map VPN_MAP 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic RA_VPN
crypto map VPN_MAP interface outside
isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
encryption aes
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
tunnel-group ITT_RA type remote-access
tunnel-group ITT_RA general-attributes
address-pool RA_VPN_POOL
default-group-policy RA_VPN_GP
tunnel-group ITT_RA ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key <group key>
group-policy RA_VPN_GP internal
group-policy RA_VPN_GP attributes
dns-server value 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value Split_Tunnel_List
default-domain value mydomain.com
address-pools value RA_VPN_POOL
access-list Split_Tunnel_List extended permit ip host 10.110.10.150 10.1.200.0 255.255.255.0
access-list nonattest extended permit ip host 10.110.10.150 10.1.200.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list nonattest
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway       Interface Metric
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0      10.111.36.1      10.111.36.9          276
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0         On-link      10.1.200.100            20
       10.1.200.0    255.255.255.0         On-link      10.1.200.100    276
     10.1.200.100 255.255.255.255         On-link      10.1.200.100    276
     10.1.200.255 255.255.255.255         On-link      10.1.200.100    276
    10.110.10.150 255.255.255.255       10.1.200.1     10.1.200.100    100
      10.111.36.0    255.255.255.0         On-link       10.111.36.9    276

Hi, i configured Remote access VPN on Cisco ASA 8.x as per below configuration.
Problem is that my internet has stopped working, and default route is just showing stars.
i can ping internal server 10.110.10.150 fine , which i allowed on VPN ACL, but my other traffic not going to regular internet on my laptop,
what additional required to force my internet to go to regular internet instead of getting encrypted?
Also attaching output of route print at the point when VPN is connected.
ip local pool RA_VPN_POOL 10.1.200.100-10.1.200.150 mask 255.255.255.0
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto dynamic-map RA_VPN 65535 set transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA
crypto dynamic-map RA_VPN 65535 set security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto dynamic-map RA_VPN 65535 set security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto map VPN_MAP 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic RA_VPN
crypto map VPN_MAP interface outside
isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
encryption aes
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
tunnel-group ITT_RA type remote-access
tunnel-group ITT_RA general-attributes
address-pool RA_VPN_POOL
default-group-policy RA_VPN_GP
tunnel-group ITT_RA ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key <group key>
group-policy RA_VPN_GP internal
group-policy RA_VPN_GP attributes
dns-server value 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value Split_Tunnel_List
default-domain value mydomain.com
address-pools value RA_VPN_POOL
access-list Split_Tunnel_List extended permit ip host 10.110.10.150 10.1.200.0 255.255.255.0
access-list nonattest extended permit ip host 10.110.10.150 10.1.200.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list nonattest
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway       Interface Metric
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0      10.111.36.1      10.111.36.9          276
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0         On-link      10.1.200.100            20
       10.1.200.0    255.255.255.0         On-link      10.1.200.100    276
     10.1.200.100 255.255.255.255         On-link      10.1.200.100    276
     10.1.200.255 255.255.255.255         On-link      10.1.200.100    276
    10.110.10.150 255.255.255.255       10.1.200.1     10.1.200.100    100
      10.111.36.0    255.255.255.0         On-link       10.111.36.9    276

Cisco 3905 problem / remote site

Hi all!
Information:
I have CUCM 8.6.2.20000-2 and many Cisco IP Phone 3905 (SIP). Some of them deployed in central office and some in remote sites.
Phone information:
Boot Version: 3905.0-0-0-01-01
DSP Version: 12.0.0.8
Application: 3905.9-2-2-0
Symptoms:
In remote sites only!
The phone is registered and working fine. However, after few hours idle state I lift the handset, dial any number and nothing happens. Drop the call and try again 2-3 times. After that either call passed or get permanent busy tone (need to reboot the phone to work again).
The phone is marked as registered on CUCM and I hear dial tone when lifted the handset.
I cannot collect debug messages from phones, because as soon as I login via telnet it going work fine.
There is no such problem in central office.
Phones print following messages in terminal all the time:
17:07:10:302 x [CENTRAL] CDP/LLDP-MED CB function is called
17:07:26:491   [sip] 03:58:24.490    pjsua_acc.c SIP outbound status for acc 0 is not active
17:07:26:495   [sip] 03:58:24.494    pjsua_acc.c "п°п╦я┘п╟п╦п╩ п я┐пЇя▄п╪п╦пҐ"<sip:[email protected]:5060>: registration success, status=200 (OK              ), will re-register in 120 seconds
17:07:26:502   [sip] 03:58:24.500         pjcu.c pjcu_on_reg_state2(), Account["п°п╦я┘п╟п╦п╩ п я┐пЇя▄п╪п╦пҐ"<sip:[email protected]:5060>] : OK,               status=200
17:07:26:506 x [pcu] pcuRcvHandler(CALL), SRV_EV, eid=0, cid=65535,
17:07:26:510 x [pcu] [pcux_insrv_cb():7071] CUCM_DateTime:Mon, 27 May 2013 11:07:26 GMT
17:07:26:511 x [pcu] Sync time from server: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:07:26 GMT
17:07:26:515 x [pcu] [set_svr_type][1599] Bfe active_server_idx=0, serverType=0
17:07:26:515 x [pcu] [set_svr_type][1602] Aft serverType=0, Server Number=2
17:07:26:531   [ipps] ----- PCU: CC_SRV, pid=0, eid=0, cid=65535 -----
17:07:26:532   [ipps] In func: remoteNtyEvtProcess(), lib = 0, cid = 65535, ntyEv = 0
17:07:26:533 f [ipps] In func: remoteNtyEvtProcess(), recv inservice nty, svrType = 0, cause = 0
17:07:26:534 f [MMI] <RCV>: In func: ui_nty(), lid = 0, cid = 65535, ntyEv = 0
17:07:26:535 x [CENTRAL] IPPS CB function(RegStatus) is called (1) with Line (0)
17:07:26:536 f [ipps] In func: mlcu_isKpmlEnabled(), KPML value = 3, blRet = 1
17:07:26:537 x [CENTRAL] Enter FSM: State(STANDBY) | Event(REGISTER_OK) | Cause(0)
17:07:26:540 x [CENTRAL] Unexpected event REGISTER_OK (cause=0) at STANDBY state
17:07:26:541 x [CENTRAL] Waiting event in STANDBY
17:07:58:990 x [CENTRAL] CDP/LLDP-MED CB function is called
17:08:39:022   [sip] 03:59:37.021         pjcu.c pjcuRcvHandler(KA), KA_REQUEST, eid=-1, p1=192.168.70.1:5060
17:08:39:040   [sip] 03:59:37.036         pjcu.c pjcu_rpt_ka_status(), target(192.168.70.1:5060): status=1, id=27
17:08:39:044 x [pcu] pcuRcvHandler(KA), KA_RESPONSE, eid=0, addr=192.168.70.1:5060, status=1
17:08:39:050 x [pcu] [pcu_polling_sipserver_thread():1478] mark!
17:08:54:130 x [CENTRAL] CDP/LLDP-MED CB function is called
Thanks for your help.

There are 2 versions of firmware on cisco.com. cmterm-3905.9-2-1-0 is the default firmware going with CUCM 8.6.2.20000-2 for 3905 phones and cmterm-3905.9-2-2-0 I've installed recently. Both versions of firmware with same problems.
       Some new information. I get traffic dump with wireshark.
INVITE sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.70.86:3457;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjdp3HjFLs7Dy03RL9ce.16qung.tOq5O3
Max-Forwards: 70
From: "............ .............." ;tag=5a25b465-747b-4c31-a020-1a9636827427
To: sip:[email protected]
Contact: ;+sip.instance="";+u.sip!devicename.ccm.cisco.com="SEP10BD18DD3F59";+u.sip!model.ccm.cisco.com="592"
Call-ID: e9edcc43-6a9b-42b8-8efc-99f702b313d1
CSeq: 28324 INVITE
Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS
User-Agent: Cisco-CP3905/9.2.1
Supported: replaces,join,sdp-anat,norefersub,extended-refer,X-cisco-callinfo,X-cisco-serviceuri,X-cisco-escapecodes,X-cisco-service-control,X-cisco-monrec,X-cisco-config,X-cisco-sis-4.0.0,X-cisco-xsi-7.0.1
Expires: 900
Accept: application/sdp
Allow-Events: kpml,dialog
Remote-Party-ID: "............ ..............";privacy=off
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length:   294
As you can see phone trying to invite [email protected]:5060, BUT I dial 7103 DN from 7102. So where are other numbers? Bug?

10.4.8 and Cisco/VPN problem solved

Hi,
This and related issues have arisen in threads on the past month, regarding the Cisco VPN v 4.9005 (and perhaps other VPN software) not working the same after the 10.4.8 upgrade. The problems relate to either not making a VPN connection, or data transfer after the successful connection is made, once the upgrade happened.
The workaround was to run the Network Setup Assistant every time to do the connection properly before launching the VPN. But this is a pain.
The eventual solution was simple, although effecting it was not straightforward. It was necessary to do a clean install of the VPN client. This is something that I could not accomplish manually, despite suggestions from the discussion group as to which files to remove, because it was difficult to find all the files that the install put it. But, at least on my machines, it could be done by command line in Terminal - cd to /usr/local/bin, ls vpn_uninstall to see if it is there, and if so, sudo ./vpn_uninstall.
I don't know if other machines can do this or if this was part of our local IT install, but IT WORKED. I AM FREE!
Wayne

that's odd....
I'm running cisco client 4.6.04 on OS X 10.4.8 and VNC without any problems...
the only difference is my radius server is an NT box, but I can AFP and VNC to my Mac on that network.

New 2.4 Macbook and Cisco VPN problems?

Is anyone else using the new MacBook Pro's with Cisco VPN? I cannot get the software to work, I get an error 51 "unable to connect to VPN subsystem" at every launch. I've ininstalled and reinstalled the cisco software, I'm using the latest VPN 4.9. I've got a 2.3 macbook pro sitting right next to it, and it runs the cisco software fine. Something with the Santa Rosa set? Any help would be greatly appreciated. I have no other network issues. All the software is up to date, system, cisco, etc. Thanks...

Fixed my own problem, appears it's Parallels related, after I reinstalled the new parallels 3.0, cisco started working fine. Whew....;-) Hope this helps others.

AD Machine Authentication with Cisco ISE problem

Hi Experts,
I am new with ISE, I have configured ISE & Domain computers for PEAP authentication. initially machine gets authenticated and then starts going MAB.
Authentication policy:
Allowed protocol = PEAP & TLS
Authorization Policy:
Condition for computer to be checked in external identity store (AD) = Permit access
Condition for users to be checked in external identity store (AD) plus WasMachineAuthenticated = permit access
All of the above policies do match and download the ACL from ISE but computer starts to mab authentication again...
Switchport configuration:
===============================================
ip access-list extended ACL-DEFAULT
remark Allow DHCP
permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps
remark Allow DNS
permit udp any any eq domain
permit ip any host (AD)
permit icmp any any
permit ip any host (ISE-1)
permit ip any host (ISE-2)
permit udp any host (CUCM-1) eq tftp
permit udp any host (CUCM-2)eq tftp
deny ip any any
===============================================
switchport config
===============================================
Switchport Access vlan 10
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 20
ip access-group ACL-DEFAULT in
authentication open
authentication event fail action next-method
authentication event server dead action authorize vlan 1
authentication event server alive action reinitialize
authentication host-mode multi-domain
authentication order dot1x mab
authentication priority dot1x mab
authentication port-control auto
authentication periodic
authentication timer reauthenticate server
authentication timer inactivity 180
authentication violation restrict
mab
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 100
====================================================
One more problem about the "authentication open" and default ACL. Once the authentication succeeds and per user is ACL pushed though ISE to the switch. The default ACL still blocks communication on this switchprort.
Your help will highly appreciated.
Regards,

You need to watch the switch during an authentication, see if the machine is passing authentication and the user may be failing authentication causing the switch to fail to mab. If your switch configuration is on auth failure continue to next method, then this makes sense. The question is why is the user failing auth but the machine is passing, could be something in the policy. Make sure your AD setup has machine authentciation checked or it may not tie the machine and user auth together and the user may be failing because ISE can't make that relationship so the machinewasauth=true is not beeing matched. Easy way to check is remove that rule from your policy and see if the same thing happens.
I've also seen this happen when clients want to use EAP-TLS on the wired, machines passes auth, then the user logs into a machine for the first time. The user auth kicks off before the user gets a cert and fails auth with a null certificate, since this is a auth failure the switchport kicks over to MAB.
I don't think wasmachineauth=true is that great, I prefer to use EAP-FASTv2 using Cisco Anyconnect NAM with eap-chaining. This is great because you can do two part authentication. EAP-FAST outer with EAP-TLS inner for the machine auth, and MSCHAPv2 for the inner of the user auth. You get your EAP-TLS auth for the machine and don't have to worry about a user logging into a machine for the first time and switching to MAB because the user doesn't have a cert yet. I also do my rule to say if machine pass and user fail, then workstaion policy, if machine and user pass then corp policy.

Cisco 1310 problem

First, i want to apologize for my English.
I have a wireless network, which connects areas isolated by the sea.
One of the repeaters have connection problems.
There is a picture that illustrates my problem.
The repeater in red, was installed recently. Because of the distances are added to each output TNC an amplifier of 1 watt.
The problem arises when the bridge that connects to the repeater, it begins to traffic on the network.
The repeater is disconnected, leaving the bridge and repeater offline.
We believe that the problem is caused by the fact that this link is at 12 meters above sea level. And we think that we could solve that problem by adding two amplifiers to the Master AP.
Any suggestion.

You did not include the config files for the 1310's, did you set the distsnce prameter for the radio on the root bridge. for longer distances the AP needs to adjust the time out values.
http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/12.3_8_JA/command/reference/cr38main.html#wp2481270
Hope this helps.
Bill

Cisco 3550 Problem

I have a number of C3550 switches in the field and one of them seems to have a problem showing Interface statistics on some fast Ethernet ports.
Most ports are running at 100Meg Full-duplex, but some fail to show any "5 minute rate" stats when I do a show interface command. You can only determine the data rate throughput by doing succesive show int commands at set time intervals and counting the difeerence in the total packets received/transmitted sections.
Has anyone seen this elsewhere? Is this a known problem as I can't see any reference to this as a problem on TAC
The IOS version is 12.1(13)EA1a

There was a known issue for interfaces with low rate of pps(<40 pps) because of the way the counter is implemented. Look at the following bug which is in a Closed state(not resolved)
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdz06305
Change the load-interval to 30 seconds and see if this makes any difference.

Cisco IOS problem

I have this error when I start my router
System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(8r) [cmong 8r], RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Bad RAM at location 0x00000000: wrote 0x00000000, read 0x00000400
Which is the problem? How can I fix it?

RAM is creating problem or you can say that not compatable just change your RAM ( If 2 RAMS are placed in Router then unplugged ram 1 by 1 like unplug 1st RAM and check then place 1st RAM back and unplug 2nd RAM and then check
i m sure your problem will solve
Hope this will help you
if yes then rate this article

Cisco E900 problem

Hi I bought a Cisco E900 wireless router in the last week. Its blocking certain websites .Its even blocking where a user has to sign in yahoo answers page or to sign in even the yahoo mail.
Please help me Its urgent

I have a broadband connection with ADSL modem. The modem and router are connected as ofcourse seen from the documentation correctly. I am getting excellent signal strength in my laptop also
I can access many other sites without any problem.Its just with some sites that are causing problem like yahoo sign in pages(but the yahoo page is accessible,from that when I click sign in or mail link it doesn't load). Also with UHRS web entry login I am experiencing issue, this site also loads but when I use its sign in button nothing happens just that site stays without any action.
Do u want me to share the snapshot , because only it says is the usual error display with browser ie
the web page is not available.
Please help to solve this issue as soon as possible

Cisco 7204VXR problem

I am experiencing a problem with a Cisco Router 7204VXR with the fastEthernet interface. The board is model PA-2FE-TX (FE2/0 and FE2/1): the FE2/1 seems to work correctly, while I have problems with the FE2/0. After putting it up and as soon as a data traffic greater than a ping passes through it, the interface becomes "frozen", still remaining up. Sometimes this fact causes problems also to the other interface (FE2/1).
I also replaced the board, but the problem remains. I observed the presence of a lot of collisions (in half-duplex mode), while in full duplex-mode neither a ping works.
Thanks in advance for your help

Hi, I suppose that u want to see the counters on the fa 2/0 while is working, but unfortunatelly i' ve setted it down few days ago couse it was causing some prob to the other interface fa 2/1 (on the same slot) and i had to reboot the router then. It was losing some packets!
Anyway the interface 2/0 was giving me many collision and deferred packets while it was still active!
If u want i can tell u the others board mounted on the router. Or something of other u want to know!

CISCO - Unsolved problems

I am very disappointed with CISCO, do not know say whether the company entered the Brazilian market to compete with expensive products and low quality. Lately acquired a 5 CISCO products for personal use and for my clients, one of them had no solution came with factory defect and was conducted with the RMA costs the customer time and money. The other products offered performance worse than poor quality products offered in my city. Summarizing like buying quality products that offer high performance and stability, however the cisco trivialized their products and lost a lot of quality in recent times, several products with bugs, signal strength well below international standards specified by 802.11 mainly. Do not go back nor recommend buying CISCO products, they are expensive and implement problems in networks that administer.
It is very necessary that the company provides on its site firmwares to correct defects and not to implement even more defects!

Cisco products perform pretty well, based on my experience. What problems were you encountering, by the way? and on which products?

Cisco Prime Problems

Dears,
we will purchase Cisco prime infrastructure, i need to know if it is usefull and if it has problems or not? coz we purchaedLMS from 2 years and it is hanging all the time.
thanks

I had the same mapping issues you're talking about. I fixed it by going into the main maps summary screen and choosing export from the drop down in the top right. If you export the maps and then reimport them the zoom level is fixed. I'd try this on one map first to make sure everything looks okay and then you can do multiple maps and or buildings at a time. I had all 100+ maps of ours updated in an hour or so doing this and all the AP locations were still fine. Make sure you log in to Prime using root so you can export/import using the XML option.

Cisco 851W Problems

I am having problems connecting some HTC smartphone devices to a CISCO 851W router. The devices receive the SSID but when we try to connect to the router they can't. The router works well for other devices (latops, PDAs) and the smartphones have worked well with a Linksys router, so the problem is specific to this the conncetion between this router and this devices.
Any help about this is welcomed.

What parameters are you using? (WEP / WPA {TKIP | AES}) etc ...
My 8525 didn't work well using AES. TKIP was OK.
It hardly worked at all with the factory / MS mobile drivers. I added Odyssey (now from Juniper ~US$35.00)and it connected nearly every time, and even worked with EAP-FAST.
Good Luck
Scott

Cisco MXE Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for