Cisco PoE switch for WAP321

Could someone please point me to a Cisco small business switch that would be capable of powering five WAP321's?
I don't know the power profile on these APs but have noticed that the PoE injectors pump out 16.8 MAX watts. I can't find anywhere what the power profile is on WAP321 APs but ~17 WATTS seems to me to be quite high.
In fact, I was interested in the SF100D-16P which has a power budget of 64W over 8 ports... the price range is in my budget.
Could anybody tell my if the SF100D-16P can power 5-6 WAP321's sufficiently? Thank you.

The WAP support 802.3 AF. Although I don't know specific detail for the power profile I can assure it should not exceed 15.4 WATT. Typically the small business power draw is less than 8 watt per port. Devices which support CDP will also have a min/max draw that optimizes the POE functions.
However, the datasheet and admin guide does not make mention of any CDP
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps12237/ps12249/c78-697406_data_sheet.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/csbap/wap121/quick_start/guide/WAP_121_321_QSG_en.pdf

Similar Messages

POE switch for the LWAPP1142N

what poe switches will handle power requirements for the LWAPP1142N and not need any type of external power injector?

Broow,
Great read on the 1142.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/wireless/access_point/1140/quick/guide/ap1140getstart.html#wp42177

Best PoE switch for home (8-ports) that can support 5-6 phones

Guys,
can you recommend 8 port switch that will provide enough power for 3 x 9971 and 3 x 7965 or similar?
Thanks!

I think the small-business switch SG300-10MP or SG300-MPP (with PoE+) could fit your needs:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/small-business-smart-switches/data_sheet_c78-610061.html

Compatible POE switches for Meru Controller

So, some background and details.
I work as a cinematographer / editor and I work with uncompressed raw video.
I'm currently using about 9 usb3 harddrives working files, and a NAS 16tb for backups.
It was indicated to me that having 9 usb harddrives attached to my computer is a bad idea for a number of reasons.
I'm working with the black-trash-can mac - 8core, 64gigs and 1tb of ssd internal storage.
my ideal solution is a server, attached via thunderbolt or a aggregated Ethernet connection.
The goal is to move working data from the 9 external hard drives onto this server, be able to access them, often, and be able to stream without interruption at (hopefully) about 600-900MB/s.
My question is:
Am I on the right track, or is there a way better solution that I'm missing?

WSUS is filling up all my hard disk partition which is 200gbAlready tried running server cleanup wizard, unticking some products and classifications but still after removing files from wsus folder and restarting it it is filling up all hard disk partitionBelow are the settings I currently have :In products anad classifications I have selected:- Exchange Server 2013- office 2007- office 2013- widnows 7- windows 8.1 Dynamic update- windows 8.1- windows server 2003- windows server 2008 r2- Windows server manager - windows server update

MDS FC Blade Switch for IBM - Licensing

Hi,
our customer has got installed the 20-port-switch of the "Cisco MDS Fibre Channel Blade Switch for IBM BladeCenter". He wants to change some of the links now. For that reason he asked me:
- Is there a fix relationship between a port and a license?
- Can we use any port as long as we fall below the number of licenses?
Thanks in advance and regards
Matthias

Hello Matthias,
Cisco Fabric Switch for IBM BladeCenter (20 ports; 14 internal 2/4 Gbps, and 6 external full-rate ports) licenses for internal ports are allocated as the ports come up. Licenses for external ports are allocated sequentially.
Refer "On-Demand Port Licensing" section on CLI guide here :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/storage/san_switches/mds9000/sw/rel_3_x/configuration/guides/cli_3_3/ondport.html
Customer can select the specific external ports he wants licensed.
switch# config t
switch(config)# interface fc1/1
switch(config-if)#port-license acquire
Thanks,
Prateek

DHCP and voice vlan on Cisco 3560 switch

Greetings,
I'm setting up a Cisco 3560 switch for voice and data comms. I'm looking for documentation with best practice guidelines for the following requirements.
1. Using the Cisco 3560 as a DHCP server - Config examples. Do I need to use different subnets for the voice and data vlans?
2. Layer 2 CoS QoS - I'm connecting Aastra phones as well as notebooks - I've been told that Aastra also makes use of the voice vlan config through LLDP and that Aastra phones supports CDP.
Your assistance will be appreciated.

Hi ,
Cisco recommends that you have a separate vlan for voice and data with different ip subnets for voice and data. You will need to configure the dhcp pool accordingly.
Here is the config guide for setting up IOS DHCP server:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0t/12_0t1/feature/guide/Easyip2.html
Here is the LAN qos recommendations:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/netstruc.html#wp1044009

Switching for Cisco IPT

Here is a question a customer emailed me today
" so im looking at the Cisco IPT solution and its impressive. after noticing the costing, i see no way of justifying the switching infrastructure. our entire organization is based on dell switching and Cisco routers.
we intend to stay with this as our switches are new has QOS and POE enabled as well as IEE power compliant as i understand and will work with the Cisco Phone models. we can also acheive the same measure of redundancy as proposed in the 3-layer model that Cisco applies. please advise as to if there are any limitations of these switches as i cannot see any at this point in time"
from a pre-sales prospective how do you justify changing to Cisco, and more importantly, from a TECHNICAL prospective do we convince the customer to change or leave?

In terms of implementation and operation: if you follow the separate VLANs for voice and data model - which you probably should - you will have to manually set the correct VLAN on every phone in the phone settings. phones use CDP to discover voice VLAN. I've done a deployment with non-Cisco switches such as this, and it definately slows things down. Of course you don't want to hurt any feelings, but... there is a reason Dell was giving away their switches for free a few years back. I like to save money too, but I wouldn't stake my business on running critical infrastructure this level of switch.

Cisco 2960S FPS-L PoE switch with Avaya 9811g VOIP setup

Hello,
I am connecting a setup for data/voice connecting Catalyst 2960S-FPS-L PoE switch with Avaya 9811g series VOIP phone. As per my knowledge cisco switch works well with Cisco phone as it has got some builtin "Macros" and Intelligent PoE recognition when we connect device getting the details of another device through CDP. I understand I have to create data and voice vlan with QOS then enable trunking on the interface to other switch that is also 2960. Little confuse if is there any compatibility issues with Switch and Avaya phone regarding protocol/data/voice...?
Do I have to do PoE config for each port on the each interface?
any help or detail config will help.
Thanks in advance.

Hi I am back after good research. created two vlan data and voice with trunk on interface1/0/48 given below config..
connection b/w 2960s FPS Switch and Avaya 9611g IP Phone.
lldp/cdp is enable on switch
So I created this config if some one can take a look .
expert advise if something wrong?..
I am only concern with Voice and PoE as voice is my priority. do i have to map something for voice quality?
also if i create another Trunk port one allow voice other allow data both cable will go to switch will that be issue?
interface....
switchport access vlan x
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
switchport voice vlan xx
srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
queue-set 2
priority-queue out
mls qos trust cos
auto qos voip trust
spanning-tree portfast
interface ........
switchport trunk allowed vlan x,x
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
queue-set 2
priority-queue out
mls qos trust cos
auto qos voip trust

POE from 3524PWR Switch for 1130AG AP?

We have a bunch of 1130AG LWAPP access points that we are installing in various locations. Those locations with newer 802.3af switches such as the 3750's and 3560's power the AP's without issue. However we have mixed results plugging them in to older Cisco POE only 3524PWR Switches.
For the most part if we plug the 1130AG's into the 3524PWR's with short patch cords they power the radios up. However, if we connect them to a longer network line (80 to 100 feet) they disable the radios and WCS alarms tell me that the switch could not supply enough power for the radios.
The Quick Start Guide (page 14) shows the 1130AG supporting both Cisco POE and 802.3af power. Is there any way to get these to reliable power up on 3524PWR switches or do I need to use power cords or power injectors?

Hi Jim,
We had this happen to us due to the same PoE problem. The 1130 requires either IEEE 802.3af power **or needs a setting on the WLC for using power injector or Cisco Pre-Standard PoE. Our older switches could only provide Cisco Pre-Standard PoE so we had to tweak the WLC Power setting for these AP's. Once we did that the Radios came right up. Here is a reference;
You may have to enter the following info in the WLC;
While the AP boots, with its Intelligent Power Management feature, it negotiates with the switch via Cisco Discovery Protocol messages in order to provide the necessary power to the AP. Even though the power injector is connected to the AP, the AP that uses this Intelligent Power Management feature gives priority to the Cisco Discovery Protocol information in order to identify whether or not the switch can provide the power. Therefore, after the Cisco Discovery Protocol message shows that the switch does not provide sufficient power (since it is not an inline power capable switch), the AP disables its radios. At this time, the status LED of the AP turns orange and this error message is recorded:
[ERROR] : AP has not enough in-line power
to enable radio slot 1 In order to overcome this problem, issue the
config ap power injector enable installed
command on the controller that is connected with this AP. This command is available from controller version 3.2.116.21. Ensure that you use the correct version in the controller.
This command specifies that a power injector is used in order to supply sufficient power to the AP.
From this doc;
Cisco Aironet and WLAN Controller Product Power Options
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/products_tech_note09186a00800946e7.shtml
Hope this helps!
Rob

Which switch for POE and 7940G phones?

I have 2 (and maybe soon 5 more) 7940G phones to add to my network, which already has a Netgear POE capable switch. I've since discovered that early Cisco POE isn't the same thing as current POE, and the switch doesn't power the phones.
I was looking at adding a Cisco SD208P 8-port switch to power the phones, but I soon discovered it only has 4 POE ports, and I'm not sure that this switch will even power the 7940G phones. And if the other 5 phones show up, I'll need two of those switches with no room for expansion on the voice network.
Will this switch power those phones?
Is there another small switch available so I don't have to replace my existing switch infrastructure to get these phones to work? Or do I need to scrap the phones and get something newer that will work with the current POE standards?

Will,
I would look at the ESW520 8 port switch, it will power the phones and will have the "*" VLAN's already setup in them.
Side note "*": This assumes that you are using VLAN100 and Cisco Voice system for the switch
Have a great day

390W PoE-Budget for Cisco 3650-24 Port Model

Can anyone provide a "show power inline" with the available PoE-Budget for the new Cisco 3650-24 PoE+ Switch? We have to be sure that the 390W from the Datasheet is 100% correct.
Many thanks
Manuel

I am not sure how many people have deployed 3650 series switches, as they are brand new. If you are not sure about the documentation, ask your system engineer to clarify it for you.
HTH

Cisco 3750x 24 port poe switch failure

what is the chance of cisco 3750x 24 port poe switch failure? is backup necessary for this ? please answer me in details.

If you have a Cisco switch with, at least, one faulty port you RMA the appliance.
There is nothing more detailed than that.

Using Cisco 7961 Phones with Linksys SRW208P POE Switch

I am having a problem getting our Cisco 7961 phones to work with a Linksys SRW208P POE switch. The internet works great , but when I connect a 7961 Cisco phone it hangs at the " configuring IP " screen. Are these model phones compatible with this switch? Any Ideas. Thank You!

I'm having a similar problem with the Cisco 7941G phones using a Linksys SLM224G4PS (with PoE). Did you ever get them to work?
The 7941Gs work with the plain Linksys SR224 and using power injectors, but not with the smart switch. It has nothing to do with the PoE, I've used the power injectors with the SLM224G4PS. It wasn't a current overload problem.
I've gotten the phones to work for somewhere between 10-40 seconds, which has given me enough time to find the IP address (DHCP) then pull up the web interface of the Cisco 7941G.
The phone on the SR244 had GARP enabled and Voice VLAN enabled and the operation, the phone on the SLM224G4PS had both disabled.
The working phone on the SR244 had a operational VLAN ID of 31, the non working phone on the SLM224G4PS didn't have any indicated.
I'm guessing that the root of the problem is the Voice VLAN, but tech support tells me that out of the box the switch should pass everything.
Apparently not so much...

CISCO 3850 PoE+ SWITCHES

Hi,
I have a device which work on PoE (IEEE802.3af).
Is it possible to sent the data + power to the PoE device by use of Cisco PoE+ (IEEE802.3at) i.e Could PoE+ Switches (IEEE802.3at) support the PoE Devices (IEEE802.3af).
Please help.
Thanks
Amey

See this:
3850 PoE, PoE+, and Cisco UPOE Ports
The PoE+ and Cisco Universal Power Over Ethernet (Cisco UPOE) ports use the same connectors as described in the "10/100/1000 Ethernet Ports" section.
They provide:
•PoE+ ports: Support for IEEE 802.3af-compliant powered devices (up to 15.4 W PoE per port) and support for IEEE 802.3at-compliant powered devices (up to 30 W PoE+ per port). The maximum total PoE power in a 1RU switch is 1800 W.
•Cisco UPOE ports: Support for powered devices on all four Ethernet signal pairs (up to 60 W Cisco UPOE per port).
•Support for Cisco-enhanced PoE.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/hardware/installation/guide/HIGOVERV.html#wp1351798

UPDATE: Deal of the Week - Cisco 3550 24 port PoE Switch

Well that didn't last long...our "Deal of the Week" this week sold out in 1 day, so we figured we better do another deal for everyone. - - - Cisco 3550 24 Port PoE Switch - $65.00 --- www.cablesandkits.com/DOW

How might you use PowerShell Direct, the latest addition to the PowerShell family that's coming with Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016? Consider this:Have you ever tried to make a configuration changeon a Friday afternoon, right before beer o’clock, and you couldn’t get access to the machine you needed to change? This problem might be caused by out-of-datesecurity settings, a network change, or something else.PowerShell Direct will work, even when otherwise things would stand in your way.According to Petri, the new software will change the way you operate "between hypervisorhost and guest virtual machine in a secure way." No more "faffing about to get security settings configured, holes poked in firewalls," or remoting in – PowerShell Direct gives you a direct way to open a session on any guest computer in seconds.
If you have Windows...

Cisco PoE switch for WAP321

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for