Cisco products with IEEE 802.1 AVB support

Hi, can anyone give me some information on availability of Cisco products supporting the 802.1 AVB standards/drafts ?

Allyson,
Is 802.1v supported on Cisco L3 switches (3560, 3750, 3560-X, 3750-X and 3850)?
Answer:  NO we dont support this feature.
=====
HTH

Similar Messages

  • National Instruments PXI with IEEE 802.15.4 standard (ZigBee)

    Bonjour,
    En fait, je travaille sur  un projet qui a pour but d’implémenter un émetteur/récepteur Zigbee en bande de base reconfigurable sur la plateforme d'évaluation XUPV5-LX110T qui embarque un Virtex 5. Je suis actuellement dans la phase de test réel.
    Premièrement, Je veux envoyer mes données venant d’un pc vers un FPGA et de les recevoir (pour traiter mes signaux sur Matlab). Est-ce-que cette tâche est faisable ou non ? Y a-t-il une solution pour ça en utilisant un média de communication (la liaison série par exemple)
    Deuxièmement, Y a-t-il un équipement de mesure et de test de National Instruments à l’aide des PXI qui supporte le protocole sans fil Zigbee ou autrement la norme IEEE 802.15.4 (à savoir RF Vector Signal Generator et Vector Signal Analyzer) de la partie frontale analogique que ce soit en émission ou en réception?
    Et merci d’avance pour tout le monde.
    Hello,
    In fact, I'm working on a project which aims to implement a reconfigurable Zigbee tranceiver on XUPV5-LX110T Evaluation platform which integrates a Virtex 5 FPGA. I am currently in the phase of real test.
    First, I want to send my data from a PC to FPGA and receive it (to treat my signals on Matlab). Is this possible or not? If yes, Is there a solution for it using a medium of communication (e.g. serial link)
    Second, is there a measuring equipment and testing National Instruments using PXI which supports the Zigbee wireless protocol or otherwise IEEE 802.15.4 standard (i.e. RF Vector Signal Generator and Vector Signal Analyzer) of the analog front-end either in transmission or reception?
    And thanks a lot in advance for everyone.

    Hello,
    I am not sure what data you will be collecting, or how you intend on using the board. Perhaps you can explain your application a little bit more?
    Is the FPGA code already developed for your application with the XUPV5-LX110T board? As long as the developed FPGA code is able to communicate with your PC via whatever protocol you choose, then you can use that as a channel to send data back and forth. Since the board is capable of many different I/O connections, you can pretty much sending/receive data over which ever connection you prefer, Ethernet, RS-232, etc.
    Just to clear up any confusion, if you do not already have FPGA code for the board, this is not something you would be able to develop with LabVIEW FPGA programming. The XUPV5-LX110T board is not supported for programming its FPGA using LabVIEW FPGA. You can however, program in labVIEW to communicate data back and forth with the I/O you have chosen to connect with to your PC, such as Ethernet or RS-232, as mentioned above.
    As far as measuring equipment NI offers for testing with the Zibee (IEEE 802.15.4) wireless protocol in the PXI platform, if your application requires you to both transmit to, and received from the board, and then you would need either both a Vector Signal Generator and Vector Signal Analyzer, or a Vector Signal Transceiver. See the list below for some examples of what we have to offer.
    VSAs: NI PXI-5661, NI PXIe-5663E
    VSGs: NI PXI-5671, NI PXIe-5672/5673E
    VSTs: NI PXIe-5644R/5645R/5646R
    From my knowledge of ZigBee, you would be capable of communicating with the board using any of these devices.
    Matthew R.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Does Cisco 3845 with NM-16A/S support OIR feature or Hot swap for this NM.

    Dear Sir
    My customer would like to implement Cisco 3845 with NM-16A/S x 4. I found that Cisco 3845 support OIR function but I am not sure OIR function that Cisco 3845 support, it support with which NM models. Can anyone tell me that NM-16A/S on Cisco 3845 support OIR function on this NM or not.
    Thank you very much
    Wisit

    Hi,
    From what I have read from the following document.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a00802ccf1d.html
    Network Modules
    Network modules install directly into slots in the rear of the router. The Cisco 3845 router supports online insertion and removal (OIR, or hot swap) of network modules. The Cisco 3825 router does not support OIR.
    Caution The Cisco 3845 router supports OIR with similar modules only. If you remove a network module, along with any installed WAN or voice interface cards, install another module and card combination exactly like it.
    Interface Cards
    Cisco 3800 series routers do not support OIR (hot swap) of interface cards inserted directly into router slots. You must turn off the router before installing or removing an interface card.
    The Cisco 3825 router and the Cisco 3845 router each provide four interface card slots, labeled on the rear panel by HWIC and a number. Each slot can be occupied by one single-wide WIC, VIC, VWIC, or HWIC.
    Hope this helps
    Sarb

  • Does 6509 switch support CDP bypass feature when interface configured with IEEE 802.1X?

     hi, guys
            we are deploying CISCO video endpoints (SX 20) for out customers, as the access switch is 6509 which version is 12.2(33)SXJ5
    following is the configuration on the interface, but the endpoints can not pass through the authentication, and also it can not get  IP address
    from DHCP server , so just want to know whether if the 6509 switch support CDP BYPASS feature?
    interface GigabitEthernet x/xx
     switchport
     switchport access vlan 400
     switchport mode access
     switchport voice vlan 409
     authentication host-mode multi-domain
     authentication port-control auto
     authentication timer reauthenticate 65535
     authentication timer inactivity 120
     authentication violation restrict
     dot1x pae authenticator
     dot1x timeout tx-period 5
     dot1x timeout supp-timeout 10
     spanning-tree portfast edge

    What image are you running now ? I am facing the same problem in 8.4(1) workround : upgrade to 8.4(2)GLX.

  • Cisco 1252s with regular 802.3af PoE switches - what are the impacts?

    Does anyone have any real-life experience with deploying the 1252s on regular 802.3af PoE switches?  I have a few 1252s one some 3560 PoE ports and the show up with "low power" alarms.
    I am wondering what the real world impact is with this scenario.  The 1252s have both 2.4 Ghz and 5.0 Ghz radios in them and I have HT enabled on the controller.
    I'm wondering what capabilities I am losing by running on 802.3af power besides the annoyance of the alarms.
    Thanks in advance!

    Sorry in advance for the book I have just written.
    I have three 1252s on 75 feet of Cat5e cable running to a 3560 PoE switch. Sometimes, but not always, I see a low power alarm on the access point(s). This is in a small building that is built like a fortress so the RF environment is somewhat challenging. I am watching WCS closely and see all three 2.4 GHz radios powered all the way up to power level 1. I notice that two of the 5GHz radios are on power level 1, and one is on level 3. I thought that RRM would not power anything down until you had at least four access points as RF neighbors. I believe I read that in a Ciscopress book and it seems to be true everywhere in our network when I look at buildings with 3 or less WAPs.
    The building in question does not have any other buildings close by with any 5GHz radios in operation - or at least I didn't see any when I did the survey.
    I'm wondering if the power setting of the radios is also related to the length of the Cat5e cabling. Seems to me a shorter run would have less resistance than longer runs, allowing the radio to have more power.
    My main concern is not this building in question, since we went for coverage and not client density in the design. We several other buildings on the radar, all libraries, which are going to be both RF challenging (bookshelves, furniture, cubicles, cubbies) and client-density challenged. These buildings have hundreds of WLAN clients in them at times - and I mean devices, not just people.
    Someone else told me (reputable source) that channel bonding is not an option when on 802.3af power. Makes sense, actually. I would never even think of bonding in the 2.4 GHz range for obvious reasons, but up in the 5GHz range it is a definate possibility in these buildings. Seems to be that we might be shooting ourselves in the foot by not using 802.3at power in these buildings.
    If channel bonding is disabled and the upper two MCS rates (using 800ns guard interval) of 117 and 130 are disabled, then I'm looking at maximum MCS rate of 104 Mbit/s compared to 270 Mbit/s with 802.3at with channels bonded in the 5GHz range.

  • IEEE 802.11n support for WRVS4400N

    Will there be an update to WRVS4400N now that the standard has been finalized?

    I think there will be some updates about this but I guess this will be relayed by Cisco. I suggest contacting Cisco Tech support to further look into your concern. I believe this unit belongs to the business series devices that Cisco is now supporting. Try to go to this link for the other business series devices and the site where you can get hold of Cisco for support: 
    http://forums.linksysbycisco.com/linksys/board/message?board.id=Switches&message.id=4273&query.id=27...

  • Cisco 3925 with ethsw module EoMPLS support

    Hi,
    I am looking for clarification that the ethsw module, NM-16ESW, will not allow for EoMPLS support?
    From what I have read on CCO it seems to suggest that the EHWIC-4/8ESG is needed to support this?
    Basically, I had 15.2(4)M1 on my 3925, but none of the EoMPLS VC's would come up for the vlans that were attached to the ethsw module.  Other EoMPLS VC that used onboard gig ports came up just fine.  All LDP signalling/routing is correct.
    Can anyone provide any confirmation?
    Thanks,
    LR

    Hi,
    The switch (NM-16ESW) inside your router runs an image for the 3560 switches and the 3560 switches don't support MPLS.  They only support vrf Lite.
    HTH

  • IEEE 802.11k roaming with client and cisco router

    I found information that Cisco supports IEEE802.11k WLAN standard with their routers.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/5700/software/release/ios_xe_33/11rkw_DeploymentGuide/b_802point11rkw_deployment_guide_cisco_ios_xe_release33/b_802point11rkw_deployment_guide_cisco_ios_xe_release33_chapter_010.html
    If read this article I think for assisted roaming I only need neigbor reports but IEEE 802.11k standard also defines several reports like channel load report etc.
    Do I need these other reports also for roaming decisions if my device is a client?

    The reason why you can't remote desktop is because you have configured the following static PAT statement that unfortunately take precedence over your NAT exemption:
    ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.1.2 3389 192.198.46.14 3389 extendable
    Do you require RDP with the public IP? if you don't and only require RDP via VPN, then please take the static PAT statement out, and RDP via VPN will work.

  • WinPE 5 802.1x Support with SCCM 2012 R2

    Please see updated information a few posts down.
    I am trying to get 802.1x support working to deploy windows 7-8 machines using MDT2012.  I have checked IEEE 802.1x network authenication protocol under features of the deployment share properties.  I am trying to follow the guide on the deploymentguys.
     I have my files on the boot image and can do a net start dot3svc, we are not using certificates at the moment for our 802.1x so I am skipping that line.  doing a netsh lan add profile filename="X:\8021x\ Local Area Connection.xml " interface="Ethernet2"
    does work.  I am having a problem with the third step when I run the following command netsh lan set eapuserdata filename=x:\8021x\Wired-WinPE-UserData-PEAP-MSChapv2.xml allusers=yes interface="Ethernet2"  All i get is error setting
    user data for interface ethernet2, the operation is not supported.
    How does one get 802.1x working in WinPE 4.0?
    Heres the latest updated in this first post so you dont have to scroll way to the bottom to get the latest relevant information:
    So here's the current situation and hopefully someone has seen it before.
    My boot image has the prestart command set to x:\8021x\configure8021x.cmd.  If i make a USB boot media this command will run and work with an 8021x wire plugged in.  If I PXE boot with a non8021x
    wire plugged in this command will run.  If I PXE Boot with an 8021x
    wire plugged in it does not run the command.  If the boot image gets staged from the windows software center it
    also will not run my command.
    Does anyone know why the staged boot image and booting from PXE are not running my prestart command?  It seems that during PXE and staged boot that the network initializes BEFORE it runs any prestart commands?

    Well progress on this issue has been made.  So why I was getting the operation not supported is because I was exporting our corporate 8021x LAN profile which gets put in place by group policy, which i assumed would work.  So i unjoined the windows
    7 machine from the domain and was then able to modify the LAN profile to be what is exactly in the documentation with images.  
    Then the above command works and I no longer get the operation is not supported and I am able to move on to the next steps which is to create a script file which contains the net start and the netsh commands i was using above to test it. Great!
    Now my next issue comes up when the instructions tell me to modify the winpeshl.ini file which it says is located at X:\windows\System32\Winpeshl.ini.  So I mount the boot.wim file that I did earlier and I browse to the location in question however
    the first thing I notice is that when I open the winpeshl.ini file to go to modify it I expect to see:
    [LAUNCHAPPS]
    “%SYSTEMDRIVE%\sms\bin\i386\TsBootShell.exe”
    Instead what I find is it says:
    [LAUNCHAPPS]
    %Windir%\system32\netstart.exe, -prompt%SYSTEMDRIVE%\sources\recovery\recenv.exe
    So I thought ok I will create a copy of this file and rename it to winpeshl.ini.bak and then modify it to say what It says it should be in the instructions which is:
    [LAUNCHAPPS]
    winpeinit.exe
    %SYSTEMDRIVE%\Windows\System32\wscript.exe, %SYSTEMDRIVE%\8021x\Configure8021xUser.wsf
    “%SYSTEMDRIVE%\sms\bin\i386\TsBootShell.exe”
    Next I unmount the boot.wim file and overwrite the copy I had.  Next I update the distribution points and PXE boot a test machine. What I see next is
    what I dont understand.  Upon booting and hiting F8 to get to a command line I cd into x:\windows\system32\ and notice that I do indeed still have my winpeshl.ini.bak file so I open the winpeshl.ini file I had thought I modified earlier and low and behold
    it contains this which is different when I look at it when I mounted the wim file:
    [LAUNCHAPPS]
    “%SYSTEMDRIVE%\sms\bin\i386\TsBootShell.exe”
    So something is modifying this file and setting it this way effectively overwriting what I put in so that my script can run and configure the 8021x user settings.
    Is there some updated documentation somewhere, how do I proceed from here??  
    The next steps after this would be to modify the unattend.xml file at a certain location to run the Configure8021xUserWindows.wsf script which does the winpe script just instead
    of running from X: it runs from C: as it says in the documentation.   But I can't move on to test this yet without getting the winpe part working.

  • Can Prime Infastructure 2.1 support Non-Cisco Products? Import a MIB from a Non-Cisco Product?

    I have an Non-cisco product that I which to manage by way of SNMP.
    The product has MIB's so can PI support it, and can I import the MIB?
    Thanks

    You can design custom SNMP polling templates to monitor third-party or Cisco devices and device groups. Using this feature, you can:
    Upload the SNMP MIB for the device type, then choose devices and attributes to poll and the polling frequency.
    Upload a single MIB definition file, or a group of MIBs with their dependencies as a ZIP file.
    Deploy the custom SNMP polling template the same way as other monitoring templates.
    Display the results as a line chart or a table.
    This feature enables you to easily repeat polling for the same devices and attributes, and can be used to customize the way Cisco devices are polled using SNMP.
    You can create a maximum of 25 custom SNMP polling templates.
    For more details on how to create custom SNMP Template, please the user guide.
    -Thanks
    Vinod
    **Encourage Contributors. RATE Them.**

  • Catalyst 2960 XR support standar IEEE 802.3i

    Hi
    The Catalyst 2960 XR support standar IEEE 802.3i?.
    becouse the datasheet not is present.
    Best regards.

    Data Sheet doesnt cover this standard:
    tandards
    ● IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree Protocol
    ● IEEE 802.1p CoS Prioritization
    ● IEEE 802.1Q VLAN
    ● IEEE 802.1s
    ● IEEE 802.1w
    ● IEEE 802.1X
    ● IEEE 802.1ab (LLDP)
    ● IEEE 802.3ad
    ● IEEE 802.3af
    ● IEEE 802.3ah (100BASE-X single/multimode fiber only)
    ● IEEE 802.3x full duplex on 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T ports
    ● IEEE 802.3 10BASE-T specification
    ● IEEE 802.3u 100BASE-TX specification
    ● IEEE 802.3ab 1000BASE-T specification
    ● IEEE 802.3z 1000BASE-X specification
    Could you please open a TAC case so that we check with BU on the same?

  • Cisco switches AVB Support

    Hi,
    Does any one have idea if any Cisco Switch model have (or will have) AVB Feature (Audio Video Bridging) support available ? What switching product have you used for AVB deployments? There should be something from Cisco available now or in near future. 

    AFAIK, Cisco IE4000 (based on 3750X hardware) supports AVB and nothing else today. You may contact Cisco to confirm the availability and roadmaps. The major market is the industrial control facilities. HTH,

  • Media Converter with 802.1q support

    hey guys
    have u ever heard of a optical to UTP media converter which supports .1q trunking, as we tried b4 but didnt work out , what we want is to have a trunk link which is via a converter (utp to fiber).
    thanx a ton in advance
    shukky
    India

    hi amit
    i personally appreciate ur input, just a thought , i tried trunking between 2 cisco 2950s with a media converter in between , it didnt work out, i mean , is it a must to have a converter with trunk functionality for the links to work and have trnking , as a converter is just a passive device which connects two ports, the links come up, but no trunking, any specific config i need to make in order to achive trunking with a converter in between with no trunk features on the converter itself.
    lastly can i have ur email id, just in case if i need more queries.
    mine is :
    [email protected]

  • Cisco ip phones authenticate 802.1x with cisco ise

    Dears,
    I want to  configure ip phones authenticate from Cisco ISE with 802.1X with certificates. But i can not find any configuration guide about this solutions.
    I find one config and this is about ACS. Please provide me any documentation guide on cisco ise.
    Thanks. 

    802.1x configuration for IP Phones
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Security/TrustSec_1-99/IP_Tele/IP_Telephony_DIG.html#69217

  • IEEE 802.1x Authentication with RADIUS failed

    Hello guys,
    I've a little strange Situation.
    If user start his Computer (Windows 7 enterprise) and computer is connected via LAN it works fine.
    If user start his Computer (Windows 7 enterprise) and computer is connected via WLAN it works also fine.
    But if user start his Computer (Windows 7 enterprise) that is connected via LAN it is not more possible to connect to WLAN (parallel). I've implemented an IEEE 802.1 RADIUS authenticiation.
    It does not work with this special user account. I've tested it already successful with couple other accounts.
    Does someone has experience with such Situation?
    Regards
    Rodik

    It does not work with this special user account. I've tested it already successful with couple other accounts.
    Hi,
    Did you mean that this problem just occures to the single User Account but others works fine at same computer, isn't it?
    When it connect Wlan failed, is there any error message? Have you tried to reinstall the WLan device driver for test?
    it would be better to provide more details about the Wlan connect failed.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for