Cisco Router support 24 E1 (Ethernet port)

Hi
I use E1/Ethernet conveter 8 port for my internet link and want to replace this converter by cisco router support 24 E1(ethernet port).
could you please suggest for me wich router model can I use for this?

thanks Leo for your answer
I have the E1s separated, now i have 24 E1 so I will need 24 port Ethernet to terminate all my 24 E1s, at total now the total sppeed is 48 Mbps, but I plan to expend this capacity later to 100 Mbps, thats way I tald you the total capacity is 100 Mbps.
can we have 24 port Ethernet for this router model and in witch module? thank you in advance.

Similar Messages

I have bought a TC to extend the range of the wireless network in the house and would like someone to explain the best way to do this? My combine router/modem is supplied by Movistar(in Spain) model Xavi 7958 router ADSL with four ethernet ports.

What is the best way to extend my wireless network in the house using a TC? I currently use a combined router/modem supplied by Movistar(live in Spain) model XAVI 7958 router ADSL with four ethernet ports. What is the best configuration and can you explain what is meant by bridging and which is best to bridge for signal strenght TC or Xavi modem/router? Have ipads, iphones, apple tv...etc and want a connection them all in the whole house which, not just downstairs, to our wireless network.

You cannot wireless bridge Apple to non-apple router.. so that is out.
The only way you can do this is run ethernet or EOP adapters.. and place the TC in a location where the other apple idevices can reach it.
If you want to repeat wireless with apple routers you have to use another apple router next to the modem.. plugged in an running as an AP.
Basically the TC is the wrong piece of equipment unless you want Time Machine backups.. take it back and buy a universal repeater.. not apple. Or buy more apple stuff like an extreme or express.. one apple router is useless to you without running ethernet.

Can cisco router support OSPF-TE and ISIS-TE same time for CSPF to compute a TE LSP? I may need to run both IGP in parreral.

Can cisco router support OSPF-TE and ISIS-TE same time for CSPF to compute a TE LSP? I may need to run both IGP in parreral.

hello - I have just moved your post to the Topic forums - you had posted your question in an obscure non-visible promotional community Hopefully our community users will see your question now.

Can cisco router support OSPF-TE and ISIS-TE same time for CSPF to compute a TE LSP? I may need to run both IGP in parallel

Can cisco router support OSPF-TE and ISIS-TE same time for CSPF to compute a TE LSP? I may need to run both IGP in parallel.

Hi Johnny,
Per my understanding you can. It is equivalent to running 2 IGP and installing the entry in RIB table based on administrative distance.
-Nagendra

Quantum Gateway G1100 router - can't get ethernet ports to work?!

I just got a Quantum Gateway G1100 router, and the improvement in wireless networking speed over my old Actiontec router is as advertised.
However, I find that I can’t get any of my wired devices to connect to the router via any of the four yellow Ethernet ports on the back of the unit. I can only connect to this thing wirelessly. Hooking up my PC to the router with an Ethernet cable gets me no connection, not even to the router itself at 192.168.1.1 (or myfiosgateway.com).
I have a PC, a printer, a network drive/media server and a Roku all wired to my router, none of them are detected. I can connect my PC and Roku wirelessly, but the network drive and printer must be wired.
The instructions act like it should be plug-and-go for the Ethernet ports, which has always been my experience with other routers over 10+ years of using Linksys, Netgear, D-Link, Actiontec, etc., units. Usually it’s the wireless network config that has hiccups. This is a first for me.
Am I missing something obvious? I’ve swapped back in my old Actiontec router just to check things out, and the wired devices all see my home network and the internet as well.
Interestingly, if I go to the “My Network” tab on the router, I see one and only one Ethernet device. I don’t know what it is, and it is labeled “Active”, but it’s sitting on 192.168.1.4, which is the static IP address I’d configured my network drive to grab, yet it is not the network drive (any attempt to connect to it just times out).

it does give me an IP address for the ethernet connection - 192.168.1.151 - that is different from the one for the wireless connection, which is 192.168.1.152. I can see both of these listed on the router's connections as well, in the My Network tab, if I Show All. But if I disable the wireless, my PC cannot ping either iteself or the router at 192.168.1.1.
In fact, I can ping 192.168.1.152 (the wireless connection) but never 192.168.1.151.
There is no IP address for my other wired devices, except that I do see 192.168.1.4 appearing, which is the static address of the network drive device. But I cannot connect to it (there is a web and media server running on the device which ordinarily pops up a config screen at 192.168.1.4).

Does cisco router support "tcp reset" mesg when the traffic blocked by access lit ?

hi ,
im trying to know if i blocked a destination with an access list on cisco.
can i make "tcp-rest " to that connection instead on dropping it ??
i belive it supported on ASA appliance , but not sure if supported on cisco routers.
im trying to migrate from linux router to cisco router and apply the same config , one of the challenging task is , i have
"reject-with=tcp-reset"
im wondering if i can do it on cisco router
waiting ur responce
regards

One of the things that keeps me engaged with these forums is that they challenge me and give me opportunities to learn new things. My initial reaction to your question about IPS on IOS router was to say that this is not supported. But I did some research and find that apparently IPS functionality is now supported on some (but not all) of Cisco IOS routers. See this link for additional detail:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/ios-intrusion-prevention-system-ips/product_data_sheet0900aecd803137cf.html
HTH
Rick

Connecting Router between Switch and Ethernet Port

I uploaded both of the router configurations I used on the 1750 router and I unable to get pass E1/0 which should put me on my companies Lan. Thanks

Well I guess the best way to explain what I trying to accomplish it create my own LAN off my companies LAN
Wall Jax-------------1751 E 1/0-----------1751 FA 0/0-------------2950 Switch
Nat the 1751 Router with FA 0/0 with this interface address 192.168.3.1 /24
And E 1/0 with a static address of 192.168.2.253 or preferable use the
"ip address dhcp Command.

Moving router to different ethernet port

I live in an apartment building. When I got Verizon internet set up, the router was connected to a ethernet port in the closet. However, after getting a Network Extender for the apartment, I've found that it would be much more convenient to have the router plugged into a ethernet port in the living area, so the Network Extender could be close to the window -- otherwise, I have to run the GPS device from inside the closet to the other side of the apartment.
I tried plugging the router into this ethernet port, and my devices were all able to connect to the wireless network, but not able to access the internet.
Is there anything I can do to make the router work off the port in the living room?

You've posted in a DSL/Dial-up forum. Do you have DSL or FiOS?
What model of router and network extender do you have? None of the Verizon supplied equipment has GPS, so I'm curious about what you really have.
This info will up us peers give you better advice.
Thanks.
If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer as Accepted Solution so others can see the solution to the problem.

Looking for an Access Point with 2 Ethernet ports

Hi,
I am looking for an AP with two ethernet ports. Is there any model of Cisco is available with 2 ethernet ports?
Regards,
Noman

pros:
If an access swich/switch port failed then AP still forward traffic through other switch once power restored through other port.
when PoE failed on its connected switch, it may still work via other port.
Having two ethernet port on AP may require to talk to different switches/stack to achieve AP port redundancy through lag or stateful switch over when cable/switch/AP port failure.
if one physical port become bad on AP, it can be still used with other.
(However, AP/physical port failure can be takencare at RF level using self healing.)
cons:
require additional switch and its config maintanece
currently, AP doesn't require 2 physical port for data transfer perspective.
Require x2 PoE ports.
Additional port increases the cost on AP.
it is possible cisco may make it in future.

I am getting an un expected error message when updating the setting to "extend network". Is there an obvious setting I may be missing? Cisco router being used.

I am getting an un expected error message when updating the setting to "extend network". Is there an obvious setting I may be missing? Cisco router being used.

If you are trying to "extend" using wireless only, you may not be aware that Apple designed the "extend" feature as a proprietary setting to only work with other Apple routers.
It is extremely unlikely that this will work with a Cisco router.
If your plans call for connecting the AirPort Express to the Cisco router using a wired Ethernet connection, it should be possible to configure the Express that way.

Sharing wifi to ethernet port troubles

I am trying to share my wireless internet connection (from a public wifi spot) to my ethernet connection on my mac. I get the wireless connection just fine on my iMac and connect to the internet directly from there, so I know that's working.
I have turned on the internet sharing option in the control panel and told it to share from the airport card to the ethernet port. However, when I plug a device (like my linksys router) into the the ethernet port and try to connect to the internet via that route it doesn't work. There is no connection it seems.
What have I done wrong? Is there some setting I am missing?
Thanks in advance.

I had the same problems with this too. Try changing your existing network to something other than 192.168.2.x (such as 192.168.1.x, or 0.x, or 3.x, or 10.x.x.x). Turns out that Tiger hard codes the 192.168.2.x network number for creating the new network, and it conflicts with the existing, to be shared network. Figured this out while searching for how to manually envoke natd, and am still annoyed that there was not even a warning about this.
Christian.

Nexus 5596 Ethernet Port Configuration

I have a Cisco Nexus 5596 with 48 Ethernet Ports (two of which are now configured for Fibre Channel). It has a FEX attached to it as well.
I was able to configure ANY Ethernet port with the typical interface commands when in interface configuration mode. However, I can now only configure existing and new Port Channel interfaces, FEX ports and standard Ethernet ports that have never been configured before.
If I try to configure an Ethernet interface that was configured in the past, I only seem to have access to global interface commands when in interface configuration mode. I can set spanning-tree, duplex, speed or any other interface parameters. The CLI acts like I'm not in interface config mode, but the prompt shows that I am.
Anyone else seen such a thing? I am logged in as admin.

Hi Mark
I suspect the interface in question is configured to be in a channel. Once an ethernet interface is configured to be in a port-channel. most interface commands need to be configured under the port-channel interface
Thanks
-Prashanth

Cisco router + SSH ?

Does a Cisco router support SSH? How to configure?

Cisco routers support SSH. However, you need to have an IPSEC encryption image running on the router. Configuring SSH on a router is a simple process.
Use this link to configure SSH:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca7d5.html#wp1007881
HTH
Sundar

Will on-board Gigabit Ethernet ports on a Cisco 3845 support a 100 Mb SFP?

Hi,
This is a very specific question - hopefully someone has tested this or run into this scenario...
I was trying to connect a Cisco 3845 router to a 100 Mbps circuit. Specifically, I was trying to connect this circuit to the on-board Gigabit Ethernet port (Gig 0/0). This is the port that can be used as either an RJ45 or SFP slot. The only SFP I had was a multi-mode 100 Mbps SFP. When I hooked it up to Gi0/0, I got a message saying the SFP type wasn't supported on the chassis.
I was able to deploy the 3845 and since then I haven't had the correct hardware to recreate the exact scenario. Has anyone experienced this? Is it simply because Gigabit interface on a 3845 won't support a Fast Ethernet (100 Mbps) SFP?
Thanks.

Not all SFP's will just plug in and work. Here are the SFP's that are considered compatible with the 3800 series ISR's.
GLC-LH-SM= Gigabit Ethernet SFP, LC connector, LX/LH transceiver
GLC-SX-MM= Gigabit Ethernet SFP, LC connector, SX transceiver
GLC-ZX-SM= 1000BASE-ZX SFP
CWDM-SFP-1470= Coarse wavelength-division multiplexing (CWDM) 1470-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G Fibre Channel (FC)
CWDM-SFP-1490= CWDM 1490-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G FC
CWDM-SFP-1510= CWDM 1510-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G FC
CWDM-SFP-1530= CWDM 1530-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G FC
CWDM-SFP-1550= CWDM 1550-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G FC
CWDM-SFP-1570= CWDM 1570-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G FC
CWDM-SFP-1590= CWDM 1590-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G FC
CWDM-SFP-1610= CWDM 1610-nm SFP Gigabit Ethernet and 1G/2G FC
http://www2.bt.com/static/i/media/pdf/cisco_3800_routers_faq.pdf

Which CISCO switch supports SFP, SFP+ and 10G ethernet ports

I would like to have information about a CISCO switch which can support fiber ports SFP(1g) and SFP+(10g) and copper 1g and 10g ethernet ports. And will it also software upgradable to support L3 protocols ?

You can choose from the Cisco 3560-E, 4900, 4500, and 6500 series switches. That's in order of capability (and cost!), from least to greatest.
The 3560-E and 4900 series are fixed chassis systems (the 4900M is semi-modular) while the 4500 and 6500 series are completely modular - buy the chassis and populate it according to your requirements.
In addition to the references cited above, also refer to the Cisco Products Quick Reference Guide (CPQRG), available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/qrg/index.html
Hope this helps. Please rate this post if it does.

Cisco Router support 24 E1 (Ethernet port)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for