Cisco RV016 und EWE vDSL

Hallo an alle
wir stehen kurz vor einen wechsel zu EWE Tel, damit wir endlich einen vDSL 35000 leitung bekommen. Nun haben wir einen Fritzbox zugesand bekommen und ich frage mich gerade wie ich das nun mit meine RV016 kommunizieren lassen kann.
Im Moment ist der RV016 mit 2 WAN ports an 2 DSL Modems eingerichtet (Telekom DSL 3000). Ich möchte keine Fritzbox nutzen für mein Firmennetzwerk sondern nach wie vor meine Cisco. Aber ich finde so wenig material darüber wie ich z.b. noch ein WAN Port freischalte und wie ich dieser zu konfigurieren habe damit der mit dieser Fritzbox (die zwingend gebraucht wird laut EWETel).
Es muss doch irgendwie eine einstellung geben das die vDSL leitung über die Fritzbox an mein Cisco ankommt und ich dieser WAN Port dann benutze so wie ich jetzt beide andere Wan ports benutze?
Wenn mir jemanden einen Tipp geben kann wo ich das in irgendwelche Forums finden kann wäre ich sehr dankbar. Wenn es jemanden gibt der das schon hinbekommen hat noch viel mehr.
Greetz
Sosy
ps. das supportforum hier ist mal wieder eine katastrophe, nix ist mit German language auswählen usw. Typisch für solche anbieter.

Hallo Herr Licheva,
es ist mir schon klar, daß ich im WAN immer eintscheiden muss, ob ich über einen vorgeschalteten Router direkt ins Internet will oder PPTP-Verbindung machen möchte. Ich komme aber ins Internet mit der Fritzbox (192.168.1.x) und ich verbinde jetzt den WAN-Port des CISCO-Routers mit einem freien LAN-Port der Fritz-Box. Nun soll der CISCO-Router eine VPN-Verbindung zu dem Portunity-Dienst aufbauen. Über diesen Tunnel bekomme ich dann eine feste IP-Adresse, die ich für den Zugang an einen NAS-Server nutzen möchte.
Das Problem besteht nun darin, daß der CISCO-Router nicht weiß, daß sein Standard-Gateway und sein DNS-Server auf der Fritz-Box liegen. Gibt es überhaupt keine Möglichkeit, dem Cisco-Router zu sagen, wenn er die PPTP-Verbindung aufbauen möchte, möge er die 192.168.1.1 als Gateway und als DNS-Server nutzen ?

Similar Messages

Problem to open ports in Cisco RV016

Hello everyone,
I have a Cisco RV016 router, with some ports configured in "Setup --> UPnP". Currently I have problems to configure new ports. I can create the service in "Service Management", but when I add this service to the list, I press "Save" and the router close the session. I need to re-login the router, and it don't save the changes.
However, if I add a service that was already exists before having this problems, the router save the changes (But the router close the session too).
The router has the last version of firmware since the first run.
Anyone has the same problem? Or how to solve it?
Thanks and regards

Hello,
Yes, I tried with different computers and different browsers (Firefox and Internet Explorer). I contact with Cisco Support and their solution is reset the router to factory settings, and configure manually all the options. Is possible that the configuration files are corrupted.
I can't reset it now, when I do I will tell you the result.
Regards

Cisco RV016 dropping company POP3 connections

I am getting crazy with our Cisco Linksys RV016. It handles 3 simultaneous connections to the internet using 3 ISP.
All our company goes to the internet using this cisco linksys RV016, our corporate switches are connected as clients to the router.
Sometime ago, this router started to drop POP3 connections to our network, when this problems is present, all users get Receiving' reported error (0x80042108) in Outlook 2007-2010.
Currently i have setup POP3 service to use the First ISP connection, but when this problem is present, the only way to eventually resolve it is to switch the link POP3 Service from the First to the Third ISP, sometimes it works immediately, sometimes don't.
We are using this router since 2007 but this problems started to arise from this month.
Our switch is the latest firmware available is Cisco website, this is the Firmware Version: 3.0.2.01-tm.
any tip, suggestion, will be really appreciated.
thanks in advance.
Sergio.

This issue is getting more strange behaviour. Since Monday, it occurs between 4.30pm and 5.00pm and after about 30 minutes it goes away without my intervention.
Is it the CISCO RV016 throughput maybe ?
Is it because i use Intelligent Balancer (Auto Mode) on all my 3 WANs? Should i use IP Group by Users instead?
Thanks,
throughput

Cisco RV016 making connections drop

Hi,
My cisco rv016 is currently set to load balance 2 lines and soon 3.
However some connections that are active here are with servers and FTP clients.
With load balancing active it appears that people are getting their sessions timed out rather frequently.
MySQL database connections
SSH connections
FTP, SFTP connections are the ones that spring to mine straight away.
Any advice?
Thanks

Right now I'm testing on a single access point (autonomous) with WEP! The same laptop works fine without the Cisco client. Usually it is several hours, 12 or more when it happens, but I've seen it less than that. And I've seen it up for over a day and a half. At this point I just don't trust the client to roll out to a larger audience.

Cisco RV016 not so Intelligent Balancer

Hi All,
We have a problem with our Cisco RV016 Routers (we have 12 of them).
Somehow the routers keep switching randomly between internet connections. (2-3 connections per router)
We want to completely disable load balancing and just use the 2nd to 3th internet connection as a failover (when 1st connection is down)
Load balancing breaks the clients session because the ip's switch mid session.
Does anyone have a solution to the problem?
We can't deploy them like this and our distributor does not want to take the unopened boxes with routers back.
We use:
Firmware Version : v4.2.2.08 (Apr 26 2013 19:12:26)
Regards,

Hi Wouter,
We had the same issue. What I did is create a rule in [System Management] - [Dual WAN] - [WAN 1 --> configuration].
The following rules are in my system:
All Traffic [TCP&UDP/1~65535]->192.168.1.1~192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)WAN1 [Enabled]
All Traffic [TCP&UDP/1~65535]->192.168.1.1~192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)WAN2 [Enabled]
The rest of the settings:
Enable Network Service Detection: Yes
Retry count: 5
Retry timeout: 30 seconds
When Fail: Keep the system log and remove the connection
Only [Remote Host] checked with value 8.8.8.8
Especially the setting with the remote host set to 8.8.8.8 is important.
Of course it's possible to set this to the IP address of the modem, but this only works if the complete modem is switched off. To failover when the internet connection is down, setting it to 8.8.8.8 works.
Hope this helps you.

Cisco RV016 2.0.18 firmware VPN timeouts

Hi i have a RV016 with older firmware that when connected to a cisco 1841 via ipsec the cisco tunnel times out and protocol goes down. Im able to pass traffic for about one minute each time its up then goes down. The only way to bring it back up is to initiate the connection on the RV016 or do a shut/no shut on the tunnel interface on the 1841.
I notice that older version of firmware is not even being offered anymore and version 3.0.x fixes a few vpn issues but the release notes dont go into it much.
thanks, Paul

Hello Thomas,
In my case, it was pfSense Linux firewall connected to the WRVS4400N...
We changed the ISP modem during the troubleshooting and as a result, the tunnel was always up at both sides. In both modems (the original modem and the new one) we used PPPoE (bridge mode) so there was no reason to have a problem with the first one...
Unfortunately, with the new modem we got another problem:
- If I try to connect from the pfSense network to the WRVS4400N network I have access all the time
- If I try to connect from the WRVS4400N network to the pfSense network I am getting "Request timed out". If I do PING x.x.x.x -t for a minute I am getting a reply and the connection works fine. As soon as I stop using the tunnel for more then 5 minutes, the WRVS4400N shows that the tunnel is up but the ping shows again "Request timed out".
As a final solution, we replaced the WRVS4400N with RV-042 and now it works fine at both sides all the time...
So... Sorry but I am done with the WRVS4400N. Do not have time for it.

Cisco RV016 Failover & Load Balance Multi WAN Issue

Hi,
I think the RV016 is the correct device to buy for our small building but I am a little confused from the manual whether my intended configuration is possible, so if you could confirm if this is possible I would appreciate it.
We have a leased line as our primary connection (lets call it WAN1). If this connection is available I don't want to load balance on any other WAN.
We have 2 identical netgear 4G devices (call them WAN 2 and WAN 3). If the leased line is unavailable, I would like to then load balance these two WAN connections.
I then have a final connection, WAN4 as a slow adsl backup line. I do not know at present whether I want to load balance this in a WAN1 failure or just have it as a backup to WAN2 and WAN3 (WAN2 and WAN3 have a 20gb data limit each on their monthly contract allowance, if the leased line is down for more than a couple of days, which has unfortunately happened before, then we will hit this limit and then need to face either extremely expensive data charges or just use the ADSL alone)
Anyway, bottom line is under normal conditions I don't want to load balance. I only want to load balance WAN2 and WAN3 in the case of WAN1 failure.
Does anyone know if this is possible? If not, is there any other similar device which would suit?
Thank you
Ben

Hi Bencarroll01,
With RV016 you can achieve what you need.
RV016 support up to 7 WAN connection, and there is two working mode
Intelligent Balancer (Auto Mode): Select this option to balance traffic between all interfaces to increase the available bandwidth. The router balances the traffic between the interfaces in a weighted round robin fashion.
IP Group (By Users): Select this option to group traffic on each WAN interface by priority levels or classes of service (CoS). With this feature, you can ensure bandwidth and higher priority for the specified services and users. All traffic that is not added to the IP Group uses Intelligent Balancer mode. To specify the services and users, click the Edit icon for the WAN interface and then add protocol binding entries for each service, IP address, or range of IP addresses.
For our case we need to have RV016 configured with IP Group(By User) so in this case we can configure Protocol binding which we can specify and force all the traffic coming from any IP address from the local network going outside through WAN1. and other WAN connection they always UP but not traffic passing through them
now if WAN1 is Down, immediately the Rule for redirecting traffic to WAN 1 will be Disabled and all the traffic will be passing through the rest of the WAN connection
After that if the WAN1 is UP again the rule of protocol binding will be active again and again all the traffic will be through WAN 1
Please let me know if you have any others questions
Please rate this post or marked as answered to help other Cisco customers
Greetings
Mehdi

Cisco SRP546W und Telekom Entertain

Hallo,
ich habe o.g. Router und möchte das Telekom Entertain Angebot nutzen.
Die Telekom Hotline erwähnte, dass der Router AXJ und AXN können muss. Was ist AXJ bzw. AXN?
Hat jemand bereits Erfahrung, ob Telekom Entertain ohne den Telekom Router mit dem SRP 546W funktioniert?
Vielen Dank.
Gruss
Thomas

Dear Thomas,
Thank you for reaching the Small Business Support Community.
Please translate your post to english or inquire about your issue on a different support channel available on your country;
https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business/sbcountrysupport
Thank you for you time and patience.
Kind regards,
Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:.
Cisco Customer Support Engineer
*Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

Cisco RV016

We've just received our RV016 router and I've followed the setup procedures. However it just isn't wanting to work with the WAN connections.
I'm currently connecting through it to a switch onto a different internet connection so it's setup LAN wise.
I was wondering if from your experiences that the issue could be down to the router we're using before using the RV016 as a gateway?
The modem/router we are using is a thomson gateway one that is supplied by the ISP.
Any advice would be hugely appreciated as currently it's in a useless state, thanks.

From your description it seems the RV016 should be set up in "gateway" mode, but I would have assumed that it would be getting an IP address from the thomson DSL modem but you've stated it's set up static. I also assume you have the RV016 set up as a DHCP server handing out IP addresses to the LAN devices, correct? I'm not seeing why you would not have Internet connectivity but this is becoming challenging to troubleshoot via this method. I think you may want to contact the SBSC at this point and speak with an engineer on the phone to help you further diagnose this issue. You can reach them at the number(s) listed on their page here.
Regards,

WLAN Public IP - Cisco RV016 Multi-WAN VPN Router

Hi, I need to get the public IP address for the WLAN1.
The IT person of my ISP ask me for the public IP address for the WLAN which MAC Address that ends with 63:17 but I can't find it in the configuration utility. How can I get it?
I attached some images so you can get an idea of what I'm talking about.
Thanks!

Hi Joaquin,
your ISP is natting on the cable or dsl modem,
for you to get an internet address, call them and ask them to put the modem in "bridge mode" or ask them to give you an internet accessible address.
That should do it.
Good luck,
Dan

How to Configure VPN in RV016 using Qucik VPN for Windows 7 and Windows 8?

Hi guys,
we have Cisco RV016 VPN Router configured with local subnet of 10.10.10.0/24 and one Static IP 117.218.xxx.xxx.for Local Gateway which is connected in WAN1 interface of RV016 Router.
I have created the VPN tunnel in client to gateway as well as group vpn and created the users as well.
i bounded the protocols for IP sec UDP500,UDP4500,TCP 10000,L2TP 1701 in dual wan page.
i enabled all the firewall rules except remote management.
I am using the quick vpn client in windows 7 machine which is connected but i unable to access the LAN devices like Host,printer,camera etc.
I used the qucik vpn in windows 8 machine its says "Remote gateway not responding.do u want wait? "
i will be happy and will appriciate if you guys give right solution
Regards
Karthik

Hello,
Here is an article that discusses an alternative to QuickVPN for Windows 8.
Alternative VPN Setup for Windows 8 on the RV016, RV042, RV042G and RV082 VPN Routers
Let me know if this helps.
Alex

Port forwarding RV016

Hello to all cisco experts!!
Hi guys im new here, I need ur help, I've got a Cisco small business router RV016. At first I have no problem in port forwarding because our first ISP install with simply DSL broadband modem, for some issue on our first ISP, our company acquire a new DSL connection on a different ISP. My problem now is our second ISP install to us a DSL modem with 4 ports built-in router so how can I forward a port for our Remote Desktop Connection (RDP) in our Cisco RV016 while the Public IP address is in the Second ISP router. I know I can use the port forwarding feature on our Second ISP router, but I would like to use the port forwarding in our Cisco RV016 because we also use the the VPN client access feature in our Cisco RV016.
Is there a way to solve my problem guys? I highly appreciate all your helps, thanks in advance.
Ricardo Trupa

Ricardo,
My name is Ismael. Iam with Small Business Support center and do appreciate you reaching out to us. From what you have described to us is that you having issue with port forwarding with RDP (3389). I am also understanding that you have a Modem/router combo from ISP and then the RV016.
For port forwarding to work, you need two rules one on your modem/router and one on your RV016 . So its source ip address will be the LAN of this modem and destination is WAN ip address of the RV180. Another rule is then configured on RV180 WAN pointing to LAN of the internal device you trying to reach. So its source ip will be the WAN on RV016 and destination will be LAN ip address of the internal device you trying to reach. This type of double port forwards can be complex and unstable. So if your network allows for configuration changes then you modem can be set to bridge mode, to simplify things and have them working for you all the time.
The single port forward can still be done, but it would require for your ISP to fully bridge your Modem. This will allow for RV016 to receive a public ip on WAN1. Once bridged only one rule is required on your RV016. Hope this helps you.

RV016 (V3) tcp and udp outgoing traffic issue

Hi everyone.
I've got a CISCO RV016 connected to a tooway SAT modem and need to reach another router connected in DSL
I need to make a TCP connection on port 8080 with my audio codec to reach the other side, and get audio.
I do not feel comfortable with all the security process, firewall, forwarding port and so on ...
What do I need to do to make the RV016 let the TCP out ?
do I need to create rules ? do I need to modify the firewall factory settings ?
does UDP outgoing traffic need some rules too ?
Thank's for your help.
Nicolas.
System Information
Serial Number : NKS16450006
Firmware Version : v4.2.1.02 (Jan 18 2012 14:10:55)
PID VID : RV016 V03
Firmware MD5 Checksum : a9817f2dbdcbd6a5c109eaa21b1c3545
LAN Working Mode : Gateway

Hi Nicolas, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I am part of the Small business Support community. If you want other method instead forwarding I could advise you One-to-one NAT. I will share a document to you regarding this configuration.
http://www6.nohold.net/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=544
I hope you find this answer useful
“Please rate useful posts so other users can benefit from it”
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Cisco Network Support Engineer.

RV016 VLAN

Have the Cisco RV016. One single internet access on WAN1. LAN1 connected to a 24-port ethernet switch. Connected to LAN8 is our customer wifi access unit. To separate the public wifi, I set LAN8 to VLAN2. LAN1 is set to VLAN1. How can I set this router to let me access from a computer on the LAN1 (VLAN1) to the Wifi Unit on LAN8 (Vlan2). This configuration has successfully kept the public out of the company network, but has resulted in no access for me to the wifi unit for administration from my desktop.
Thanks,
Mike

This unit supports port base vlan, it won't route the vlan's between. The router does not support 802.1q nor does it support SVI.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts

RV016 incomming sip-requests filtering

Good day,
i have a trouble setting up Cisco RV016 router to correctly handle SIP requests.
Here what i have:
LAN - 10.1.0.0/24
10.1.0.1 - LAN IP of RV016
10.1.0.2 - IP on NIC of software IP-PBX "3CX Phone SYSTEM"
RV016 have two WAN interfaces configured, to work with different ISP's.
I also have an VoIP service provider somewhere throught the internet, who is handlling both incomming and outgoing calls.
In order for incomming VoIP-calls to work correctly, i made some port-forwarding rules:
SIP - all incomming connections to WAN interface and destination port 5060 are translated to the 10.1.0.2
RTP - all incommming connections to WAN interface, and destination ports 9000-9015 are translated to the 10.1.0.2
It works fine, but with one very unpleasant fact - everybody from the internet can send SIP-register requests to my IP-PBX, so in a short time i have non-stop "register" attempts from different IP's. I tried to make some Firewall Access rules, but RV016 just ignores them, when Port-Forwarding rule is applied.
In previous solution i used, there was the simple possibility to make rule to allow incoming connection on WAN port just from the single source IP-address, but, sadly, RV016 doesn't have such a feature.
Here what is the question:
What should i do? I can't leave the situation as it is, but i really don't want to change the router.
Can someone please help me with advice?

Here is an example showing how to add access rules on top of a port forwarding rule.
When an Access Rule is defined on top of a port forwarding rule (e.g. SSH service), you want to first add a Deny rule to deny all IP addresses coming from the WAN side and then add an Allow rule to allow specific IP address entering from the WAN side.
Allow SSH WAN1 [specific IP] [private address]
Deny SSH WAN1 Any [private address]

Cisco RV016 und EWE vDSL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for