Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router USB setup with Telstra 4G MF823

I am trying to setup Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router to work with my prepaid Telstra 4G MF823 device. Could you please assist. My settings are as follows: InterfaceUSB2Connection Type:3G/4G PIN Code:Confirm PIN Code:USB Connection Status:3G/4G modem is not available.Access Point Name:telstra.internetDial Number:Username:Password:Enable DNSDNS Server (Required): 8.8.8.8DNS Server (Optional): 8.8.4.4MTU:AutoManualB

Hi oz000,
Unfortunately we don't have anyone here to assist with this particular issue. Our team here provides assistance for the device standalone, we ensure that the 4G device connects to the network and functions correctly on its own.
-Matt W

Similar Messages

RV320 - Dual WAN - Load Balance Problem

Hi all,
I've just bought a RV320 Dual WAN router an try to get it running. My network setup looks lice the picture attached.
I have 2 WAN Connections:
- Router 1 (16Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - no public WAN IP
- Router 2 (3 Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - Fixed public IP
Router 1 ist connected to WAN1 and router 2 to WAN2 port on the RV320.
I have enabled load balancing mode.
Qustions:
1.
I want WAN1 to be the primary line to be used until capacity reached.
Currently for some reason I don't understand the cisco always uses WAN2.
That's not good as all browsing and downloading is limited to 3mbit.
When I switch to "fail-over" mode and set primry live to WAN1 that works, but WAN2 is not kept alive.
2.
I am using VOIP and need to route all VOIP traffic to WAN2 interface.
The best would be to tell the router IP 192.168.177.9 (voip phone) should use WAN2. So far I didn't figure out how to do that.
Can I put VOIP into one VLAN group and allocated VLAN to one specific WAN interface?
Brgds

So, you can hear the phone ringing and answer it? which means that SIP pakets are coming through WAN to LAN and well redirected to the phone IP, but you cannot hear after that, which means that there could be a problem with the RTP packets.
If you have problem only with the incoming calls and not the outgoing, than try enable/disable SIP ALG (Firewall). If that doesn't fix the issue, try to allow (or even forward) from WAN to LAN RDP - UDP ports 16384-32767 to the phone IP.
Regards,
Kremena

Windows server with dual wan router

Hello, I have a doubtful scenario to be addressed. We had our 2008 server running on a single internet connection, but since its not reliable and has down time we planned to get another one. We also bought a
DUAL WAN Router so that we get some of the IPs without the group policy applied for testing purposes. So if we run a DHCP
server on the router instead of the Windows 2008 server, will it work? We need one internet connection as the main connection and the other as standby for continous internet access.

Guys,
This is getting difficult to follow the conversation. Let me try to clarify,..this is way way simpler than what it is being made (as far as I can interpret the situation).
1. The dual WAN is completely irrelevant to the situation. It could easily be a single WAN (single ISP) and it wouldn't make any difference.
2. The WAN Device is the "Firewall",...meaning it is the NAT device,..and the only NAT Device
3. There is no VPN,...but if there were the VPN would have to be performed by the WAN Device, meaning that you would have had to purchased one capable of such.
4. The private LAN, as far as I can tell from what I read, is a single subnet "flat" network. Hence there is no router, none, zero,...and there should not be.
5. The result of #3 and #4 mean that RRAS should not be enabled on any server on the LAN anywhere.
6. DHCP needs to be, or at least it is best to be, "Active Directory Aware". Therefore it should be run on the Domain Controller. The WAN Device should have Client serving DHCP completely disable.
7. Group Policy is applied to an OU. If a machine account is in such OU then the policy will be applied, if the machine account is not in the OU then it will not be applied. GPOs should be applied to specific OUs,...not at the "root" of the tree.
The only policies that should be applied at the "root" are the Default Domain Policy and the Default Domain Controller Policy,..and those should never be touched and left at their "default" so that you have a place to return to if GPO things go badly.
Do not leave objects within the Default Containers (Computers, USers, etc). Always create one or more OUs (you can even nest them), move the objects into them, and Link (apply) the GPOs at that level.
Hope this helps clarify things.
Phil

RV325 Dual WAN Router - Use only one IP

I have a rv325 dual wan router. I have setup load balancing on the router, but I don't want one of the servers here being load balanced. How do i set it to only use a specific WAN while everything else is load balanced?

Michael,
I like to share link that will has a step by step screenshots on how to configure protocol binding. Your source ip will be server and Destination is whichever WAN you are shaping that traffic. Hope this helps
Article ID: 4242
http://sbkb.cisco.com

VPN and a Dual Wan router confusion

I am running a Border Manager 3.9 server with a Dual Wan router supplying the 2 ISPs load balancing to a single NIC on the Border Manager Server. I want to try setting up a VPN.
Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
Just wondering,
[email protected]

In article <[email protected]>, Rlmillies wrote:
> Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
>
Hah! Well, inbound traffic in general can be problematical on a
dual-wan system.
Here you have two issues, if the router is like ones I've worked on.
First, load balancing. You can't (probably - this is based on my
experience) set up a static NAT of one of the public IP addresses to
the BM 'public' address and still load balance. My experience is that
as soon as you do that, it forces both inbound and outbound traffic
onto that particular WAN link, so it kills load balancing/failover.
Which means you need to do port forwarding on the router for all the
VPN ports. You will need TCP and UPD 353, and UPD 500 and 4500 inbound
(and replies outbound). If using a site-site VPN, you also need TCP
213 inbound.
You will have to configure the VPN address in BMgr to use one of the
WAN public IP's. The VPN will only work on that one WAN link.
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

RV320 Dual wan setup, wan2 keep disconnecting after a few mins.

I have just switched out our offices rv120w for a rv320. I have set it up for dual wan with fail over. Both WANs are on static ip's. I have the settings working separately, but if i connect both connections to both WAN ports, WAN2 keeps dropping its connection.
It will show in the summary as 0.0.0.0 after a few seconds. I set it up, hit save and it shows both IPs in WAN1 and WAN2...as fast as i can refresh it, it will show WAN2 back to 0.0.0.0
Any thoughts?

as it turned out this was an issue with the ISP that has now been corrected.
on another note i could not change the MTU to 1500 as it would always reset to 1492....
(latest Firmware)
Cheers
Dazzler

Cisco RV042 - Dual Wan Load Balancing - Secure Site (HTTPS) Trouble

PID VID :
RV042 V03
Firmware Version :
v4.0.0.07-tm (Aug 19 2010 19:19:50)
Ever since I setup my RV042 with load balancing using the Dual Wan system I have had trouble staying connected to some secure sites. After doing some searching I found that the potential issue is the IP change mid session.
"http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r25537589-Cisco-RV042-can-not-use-load-balancing-for-some-web-sites"
Although my interface is significantly different I was able to find the same area in my RV042 admin area however, it doesn't seem to work.
System Management
> Dual Wan
In Wan 1 & Wan 2 I have HTTPS and HTTPS Secondary all forwarded to use Wan 2 under Protocol Binding
This however has not managed to do anything at all for my network and every computer conneceted experiences the same HTTPS irregularities at some websites.
I'm sure I must be doing something wrong, but I don't know what it is.
Both incoming connections are from the same service provider although the plans are different.
Any help with this would greatly help me stop losing my mind trying to fight with my website control panel for 10 minutes to just login and get something done.
Thanks

Any ideas or advice from anyone?

Lrt224 dual wan router

Hi im new in dual wan setup. Please help.
Heres my problem
Wan 1 dynamic globe telecom primary
Wan 2 static pldt telecom
Link failover mode
1 router is plug in to lrt224 to serve wifi and my switch also plugin to the wireless wifi
1 cctv dvr connected to lrt224 port 9000 webport 9100 with auto detect settings setup
Now:
Sometime cctv camera broadcast to public ip when switch to wan2 but sometimes cant show also
Same way around with dynamic wan 1 as primary
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks Guys, its a big help.......

Cisco 2500 dual band router. the hp printer is connects on one band, pc the other help

Cisco 2500 wireless router Dual Band N, HP PhotoSmart C309-g, Windows 7
PC cannot find the printer because it connects on a different band. Cisco uses the same name for both bands. How do I get both devices on the same network.

I also have a dual band router, Cisco's LinkSys EA3500 N750; and the 5.0gHz band is necessary to avoid interference with other equipment operating on 2.4gHz. I put TP-link 2.4/5.0 gHz adapters on each PC (one HP another Sony, both a few years old) and the PCs now work fine, no loss of internet/network access. Would that solution also work for the printer? The printer does not recognize any network (even though the 2.4gHz shows as available and strong on the TP-link device. I used the same name and security code for the new router as the old; again, neither PC had a problem finding it.

OS X Server as a Dual WAN Router

Hello.
I am studying a way to use a Mac Mini with Snow Leopard Server as a Gateway for our network (about 20-30 clients). I know I can use a USB NIC as a 2nd interface to the internet. I wonder if I could use 2 USB NICs to simulate a 2 WAN router. Could it work for load balance? I have 2 ISPs and my router (Hotbrick) has just died.
So my config would be: 2 USB NICs to handle the 2 ISPs connections and the integrated NIC to connect to my internal network.
As I have very little experience on MAC OS X server, I ask if I could this way have NAT, Firewall, Load Balance and VPN services.
Thanks in advance.

There's no inherent load balancing option within Mac OS X, so using Mac OS X to load balance multiple upstream WAN links is going to be tricky, for sure.
There are ways of doing it, but it's far outside of the box, and I wouldn't recommend it, especially if you're new to using Mac OS X Server.

Initial USB setup with Mac OS X 15.5 what's wrong ...

I clearly don't understand what is going on here :
first My Nokia won't work using Bluetooth on Mac while Apple says it can http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2824
now I'm trying the Initial USB setup described here :
http://europe.nokia.com/A4372155
iSync don't see the phone, and Nokia Multimedia Transfer sends an error : 6600 slider is unsupported !!!
http://xzu.free.fr/nokia/6600sl.jpg
so what ??? should I change phone ? Sony ercisson ? Motorola ?
guys, please make it work or stop the lies on your advertises and websites !

31-Oct-2008 03:12 PM
xzulien wrote:
I clearly don't understand what is going on here :
first My Nokia won't work using Bluetooth on Mac while Apple says it can http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2824
Hi xzulien
Unfortunately several phones for which iSync plug-ins worked under Tiger don't work under Leopard.
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

Cisco 2901 Dual WAN, VRF, Vlan Isolation configuration help

I'm very new to Cisco iOS, so please forgive me. I know what I'm trying to accomplish, but perhaps not best at describing.
I have two ISPs 1) Fiber with Static Range 2) Cable with 1 Static address.
Tasks:
Assign GigE0/0 to Fiber
Assign GigE0/1 to Cable
Create Vlan10 for Fiber connectivity and Static Range (aaa.bbb.ccc.145 - aaa.bbb.ccc.150)
Create Vlan20 for Cable connectivity with ip address 10.10.0.0
Assign GigE0/1/0 - GigE0/1/4 for each static IP address in Fiber range (aaa.bbb.ccc.145 - aaa.bbb.ccc.150) Vlan10
Assign GigE0/1/5 to Cable Vlan20
Expected end result, GigE0/1/0 - 0/1/4 will use Fiber. GigE0/1/5 will use Cable, no failover's.
I have been able to get Fiber connectivity working fine, can ping Vlan and is online. I have been able to get Cable Vlan working fine, but cannot get online. If I ping using a device on a separate network I can hit both Fiber and Cable statically set ip addresses, so WAN config seems to be fine. Internally, Cisco can ping Google from Fiber only, but not from Cable. This is where my i'm new, from my reading it appears as though either PBR or VRF should enable this functionality since the router seems to be unable to redirect traffic for Cable requests. I used this tutorial as my guide (https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/70882), but it's getting lost in translation when trying to actually implement.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2905 bytes
! Last configuration change at 06:48:54 UTC Mon Nov 17 2014
version 15.2
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname Cisco2901
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable secret 5 password
enable password 7 password
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 5
ip cef
ip cef load-sharing algorithm original
ip vrf FIBER
ip vrf CABLE
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp pool VLAN10
network aaa.bbb.ccc.144 255.255.255.248
default-router aaa.bbb.ccc.145
dns-server 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
class Fiber_Class
address range aaa.bbb.ccc.145 aaa.bbb.ccc.150
ip dhcp pool VLAN20
network 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.10.0.1
dns-server 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
ip dhcp class Fiber_Class
ip name-server 8.8.8.8
ip name-server 8.8.4.4
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO2921/K9 sn FTX1828AKAY
archive
log config
hidekeys
redundancy
interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address eee.fff.ggg.58 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address hhh.iii.jjj.86 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/1
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/2
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/3
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/4
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/5
switchport access vlan 20
ip vrf forwarding CABLE
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/6
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/7
no ip address
interface Vlan1
no ip address
interface Vlan10
ip address pool VLAN10
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface Vlan20
ip address pool VLAN20
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/1
snmp-server community WWM_Cisco2901 RO
snmp-server enable traps entity-sensor threshold
control-plane
line con 0
line aux 0
line 2
no activation-character
no exec
transport preferred none
transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh
stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
password 7 password
login
transport input all
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end

Thanks for your assistance, much appreciated. So I adjusted per your recommendation, and in the process lost Fiber connectivity. Perhaps I misunderstood a suggestion? This is my current (failing) config:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2905 bytes
! Last configuration change at 06:48:54 UTC Mon Nov 17 2014
version 15.2
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname Cisco2901
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable secret 5 password
enable password 7 password
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 5
ip cef
ip cef load-sharing algorithm original
ip vrf CABLE
rd 1:20
ip vrf FIBER
rd 1:10
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address aaa.bbb.ccc.145
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.0.1
ip dhcp pool VLAN10
network aaa.bbb.ccc.144 255.255.255.248
default-router aaa.bbb.ccc.145
dns-server 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
class Fiber_Class
address range aaa.bbb.ccc.145 aaa.bbb.ccc.150
ip dhcp pool VLAN20
network 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.10.0.1
dns-server 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
ip dhcp pool LANUSERS
import all
network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 255.255.255.0
network 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.0 secondary
override default-router 10.10.0.1
default-router aaa.bbb.ccc.145
dns-server 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
lease 0 8
ip dhcp class Fiber_Class
ip name-server 8.8.8.8
ip name-server 8.8.4.4
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO2921/K9 sn FTX1828AKAY
archive
log config
hidekeys
redundancy
interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address eee.fff.ggg.58 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address hhh.iii.jjj.86 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/1
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/2
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/3
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/4
switchport access vlan 10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/5
switchport access vlan 20
ip vrf forwarding CABLE
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/6
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/7
no ip address
interface Vlan1
no ip address
interface Vlan10
ip vrf forwarding FIBER
ip address aaa.bbb.ccc.145 255.255.255.248
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface Vlan20
ip vrf forwarding CABLE
ip address 10.10.0.0 255.0.0.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source route-map VLAN10 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map VLAN20 interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 aaa.bbb.ccc.145
ip route 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan20
ip route aaa.bbb.ccc.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan10
ip route vrf FIBER aaa.bbb.ccc.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
ip route vrf CABLE 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
access-list 10 permit aaa.bbb.ccc.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 20 permit 10.10.0.0 0.0.0.255
route-map VLAN10 permit 10
match ip address 10
match interface GigabitEthernet0/0
route-map VLAN20 permit 20
match ip address 20
match interface GigabitEthernet0/1
snmp-server community WWM_Cisco2901 RO
snmp-server enable traps entity-sensor threshold
control-plane
line con 0
line aux 0
line 2
no activation-character
no exec
transport preferred none
transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh
stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
password 7 password
login
transport input all
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end

[solved] Dual head / Xinerama / xrandr setup with Intel 945 & dwm

Recently came into possession of a 17" LCD and would like to use it in tandem with the internal LCD of my netbook. Clone works with xrandr, as does extended mode to an extent. The problem is that in extended mode (or spanning, or whatever you want to call it) the smaller screen has dead space which isn't respected by dwm (or any other WM I've tried). So I'd like to setup dual X sessions (aka Zaphod mode?), each running their own instance of dwm--I don't need to move windows from screen to screen so that's not a concern.
Has anyone had luck accomplishing this with the current intel driver? The closest I've gotten so far is a black screen/blinking cursor which drops back to a login prompt after a few seconds. I see a ton of related topics on Google about this and most of them are unresolved. If I can get something put together I'll document it in the dwm and/or intel wikis.
Specs:
* Acer Aspire One AOD150 with Intel GMA945 @ 1024x600
* LCD @ 1280x1024
Last edited by thayer (2009-08-30 05:03:14)

It's a work in progress, but for those who are interested I was able to get a dual-head setup (using xrandr and the Xinerama extensions) with the current Intel driver (not legacy) using the following:
/etc/X11/xorg.conf:
# file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf
# author: Thayer Williams - http://cinderwick.ca
# vim:enc=utf-8:nu:ai:si:et:ts=4:sw=4:ft=sh:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "AA1Xorg"
Screen 0 "AA1Screen" 0 0
InputDevice "AA1Keyboard" "CoreKeyboard"
InputDevice "LogitechMX518" "CorePointer"
InputDevice "SynapticsTouchpad" "AlwaysCore"
Option "BlankTime" "0"
Option "StandbyTime" "0"
Option "SuspendTime" "0" # disable all other forms of power save
Option "OffTime" "10" # turn off DPMS-capable monitor after x mins
EndSection
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "DontZap" "false" # ctrl+alt+backspace to restart x (see input too)
Option "AIGLX" "false"
Option "AutoAddDevices" "false" # false to disabl hal hotplugging
Option "AllowMouseOpenFail" "true" # load Xorg even if mouse input not found
EndSection
Section "Files"
ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/artwiz-fonts"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/local"
EndSection
Section "Module"
Load "synaptics"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "AA1Keyboard"
Driver "kbd"
Option "CoreKeyboard"
Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
Option "XkbOptions" "terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp" # yes, we really want ctrl+alt+backspace to restart X
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "LogitechMX518"
Driver "mouse"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
Option "Protocol" "ExplorerPS/2" # options: ExplorerPS/2, IMPS/2, auto, USB (Exp. req'd for side-buttons)
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
Option "Buttons" "5"
Option "ButtonMapping" "1 2 3 8 9"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "SynapticsTouchpad"
Driver "synaptics"
#Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
Option "Protocol" "auto-dev"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
Option "SHMConfig" "true" # configurable at runtime? security risk if on
Option "LeftEdge" "1700" # x coord left
Option "RightEdge" "5300" # x coord right
Option "TopEdge" "1700" # y coord top
Option "BottomEdge" "4200" # y coord bottom
Option "FingerLow" "25" # pressure below this level triggers release
Option "FingerHigh" "30" # pressure above this level triggers touch
Option "TapButton1" "1" # mouse button reported on a non-corner one-finger tap
Option "TapButton2" "2" # mouse button reported on a non-corner two-finger tap
Option "FastTaps" "true" # make single-taps faster, and double-taps slower
Option "MaxTapTime" "180" # max time in ms for detecting tap
Option "MaxTapMove" "220"
Option "VertEdgeScroll" "true" # enable vertical scroll zone
Option "HorizEdgeScroll" "true" # enable horizontal scroll zone
Option "CornerCoasting" "true" # enable continuous scroll with finger in corner
Option "CoastingSpeed" "0.30" # corner coasting speed
Option "VertScrollDelta" "100" # edge-to-edge scroll distance of the vertical scroll
Option "HorizScrollDelta" "100" # edge-to-edge scroll distance of the horizontal scroll
Option "MinSpeed" "0.09" # speed factor for low pointer movement
Option "MaxSpeed" "0.18" # maximum speed factor for fast pointer movement
Option "AccelFactor" "0.0015" # acceleration factor for normal pointer movements
Option "VertTwoFingerScroll" "true" # vertical scroll anywhere with two fingers
Option "HorizTwoFingerScroll" "true" # horizontal scroll anywhere with two fingers
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "AA1Monitor"
VendorName "Acer"
Option "DPMS" "true"
HorizSync 28-96
VertRefresh 50-75
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Intel945"
Driver "intel"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
Option "Tiling" "false" # controls whether buffers are allocated in tiled mode
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "AA1Screen"
Device "Intel945"
Monitor "AA1Monitor"
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "1280x1024" "1280x600" "1024x768" "1024x600" "800x600" "640x480"
Virtual 2048 2048
EndSubSection
EndSection
Until I have a chance to write a fancier script I've added the following to ~/.xinitrc:
xrandr --output LVDS1 --mode 1024x600
xrandr --output VGA1 --below LVDS1 --mode 1280x1024
The first command ensures the netbook screen takes the proper resolution and the second enables the external LCD. If I startx when the LCD is disconnected then the netbook screen is the only screen enabled (no dead space).
Caveats
1. With mplayer in fullscreen it appears as 1024x600 even when opened on the 1280x1024 screen.
2. The external LCD cannot be placed left or right of the netbook screen because it would exceed the 2048 virtual resolution which segfaults X with the latest intel driver. Virtual cannot be set higher than 2048 in either direction without segfaulting X; though I imagine this will be addressed in future versions of the intel driver.
Many thanks to mzapotoczny!
Last edited by thayer (2009-08-30 04:41:40)

I can not see the airplay icon on my ipad3. I have an ipad3, apple tv 3rd gen, networked through a Cisco e4200 dual band router on the n wireless band. Both can access the Internet, but I can not mirror or receive the iplay icon on my devices.

.

No app I'm afraid.
These problems can be multifactorial but often are network related.
You have enabled Home Sharing on all devices?

Simplest dual-WAN setup for LRT224 ?

Hi folks
Hope someone can help with some insight / advice here.
First, some background :
For a while I’ve been using a conventional ADSL modem-router device to connect to my primary ISP, and thereby provide internet connectivity to a number of desktop PCs, laptops and other mobile devices in a small office environment. I plug the “output” (LAN port) of the ADSL modem-router into a switch, and I also plug a dual-band wireless access point (WAP) into the switch to provide wireless access for the mobile devices. Generally this all works fine.
One problem of course is that if/when my ISP goes down - which does happen occasionally - I have no internet. Also, I am starting to need extra bandwidth, and ADSL connectivity has pretty much reached its speed ceiling in my area. So I’ve been looking at ways of providing redundancy and higher speed by having multiple connections, possibly with different technologies and different ISPs. One option is to go with multiple ADSL connections; another (perhaps better) option is to go with a high-speed fixed-wireless (LTE) connection. With LTE, I can easily get over 30Mbps, so I’ve gone with that option for now. FTTH may be an option on the future. Obviously I needed a 2- or 3-WAN router device to do the connection management.
I had a preference for a dual-WAN router that isn’t tied to any particular communication technology (like ADSL, or VDSL) to give a degree of future-proofing for new technologies like FTTH. I prefer modem devices that have a conventional ethernet port as an output, and hence router devices that have ethernet ports for WAN inputs. This eliminates “combined” devices like Draytek’s “Vigor” ADSL+WAN modem-routers, or routers that have provision to connect a USB 3G stick modem for failover.
While shopping around, I looked at options like the Cisco RV042/043, the Peplink Balance 20/30, and the Belkin/Linksys LRT224. The LRT224 seemed to offer a reasonable compromise between price, features and performance, so I went with it.
Both my CPE devices are combined modem-routers that completely manage the connection to their respective ISPs, presenting me simply with an ethernet port (or ports) for connection to my local LAN. Specifically, I’m using a D-Link DSL-2500U ADSL modem (1 LAN port) and a Huawei B593s-601 LTE modem (4 LAN ports). Both include the usual functions such as DHCP server, NAT, firewall etc. Previously I’d always give the ADSL modem a fixed IP, and then it let it handle DHCP for the whole of the downstream network. So far, so good.
My requirements for now are pretty straightforward :
- Simple failover operation, ie if one ISP (WAN) goes down, the router should transparently and quickly re-route traffic to the other ISP.
- Load-balancing, ie the ability to apportion traffic between the two ISPs according to a number of different algorithms. Ideally I would want to see options like : equal traffic (bytes) per ISP, % traffic split (eg 60:40), pro-rata split based on connection speed or latency, etc etc ..
- Ability to log into the ‘Web control panel for any of the three devices (LTE modem, ADSL mode, or dual-WAN router) directly from the office LAN without unplugging or re-cabling anything.
- I've no need to use the VPN functionality on the LRT224 at the moment, though that might come later.
Here’s where I need some input and help :
So far, the only way I’ve been able to get this all to work together is as follows :
1) Set up the ADSL modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.1.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.1.50/149.
2) Set up the LTE modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.2.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.2.50/149.
3) Set up the LRT224 to get WAN-side IP’s from the upstream devices on both WAN1 and WAN2.
4) Set the LRT224 in “Gateway” mode.
5) Set up the LRT224 with a fixed IP of 192.168.0.1, and to issue downstream DHCP IP addresses in the range 192.168.0.50/149.
What I've noticed in trying to get this all to work is the following:
6) This only works (and gives visibility of all 3 devices) when the two modem devices are on different subnets (like 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x). Trying to put them both on the same subnet as the downstream side (all on 192.168.0.x) just doesn't work, or one device is not visible.
7) This only works with the LRT224 in "Gateway" mode, even though "Router" mode seems more fitting.
The setup given above (1 through 5) does work, and gives a situation like the following :
Failover works OK, and I can see any of the three edvices from the office LAN by connecting to any of the assigned IPs.
However, the problem is that the throughput really sucks.
If I connect the LTE modem (only) direct into the office LAN, I get in excess of 20Mbps downlink speed. However, when connecting via the LRT224, I don't even get half that speed, even if the LRT224 is in simple failover mode and the ADSL modem is turned off or out of the picture.
Given that the LRT224 isn't "processing" the packets at all, and there's no VPN overhead, I find it hard to understand why it sucks up over 50% of the throughput. Also, the reviews I read on the LRT224 listed throughputs in the hundreds of Mbps, so this really shouldn't even be a factor. Also, having the LRT224 eat half the throughput partly defeats the one object (higher speed).
So my question is : Is the above setup really the way to do what I want ? Or is there a better way ? The upstream arrangements with dual DHCP on different subnets seems overly complex. Is there a simpler way with PPoE, or PPTP, etc ?
What might I be doing wrong ?
Any input or advice would be much appreciated.
Thanks

Thanks for the suggestions, guys; although I've pretty much covered all of those things.
For info :
1) The router came with firmware v1.0.0.9 (Nov 25, 2013 - the initial release), but I have updated it to the latest v1.0.2.06 (Mar 28, 2014). (This is the third release in 4 months, so it seems Linksys is working fairly actively on LRT2x4 firmware).
2) I have the "Maximum Bandwidth" figures (reached at Configuration / System Management / Bandwidth Management) set to the appropriate values, including a maximum downstream value of 61 440kbps (60Mbps) for the WAN port to which the LTE modem is connected. My understanding, though, is that the LRT224 doesn't DO anything with this information unless there are one or more bandwidth management policies set. (My understanding may be wrong, and the manual isn't much help). I have no bandwidth management policies set.
3) I did try disabling all of the firewall rules as suggested by Flybyknight - no improvement.
One interesting (and unintended / undesired) consequence of my setup is that I can only "see" the configuration pages (web interfaces) for both upstream modems (ADSL and LTE) when the router is in "Load Balance" mode. If it is in "Failover" mode and the primary WAN is up, then I can't see the modem on the secondary (failover) WAN. I assume this is because traffic is only being routed to the active WAN port.
I guess my uncertainty is more about the upstream setup, ie the way in which the upsream-facing WAN ports on the LRT are configured to talk to the downstream-facing LAN ports on the respective modems.
The user guide for the LRT224 is really poor, unfortunately. It doesn't explain the actual workings of the various features at all. For instance, it does not explain what the ACTUAL working of "load balance" is. Does the device route the same amount of traffic (bytes) to both WAN ports, or does it do so in proportion to their configured speeds ? Proper explanations for these features are really indispensable! Belkin/Linksys, are you listening ??

Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router USB setup with Telstra 4G MF823

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for