Cisco switches and virtual ip address(load balancing address) on xenapp portals

Hi I am quite new in configuring cisco switches and stumble across an issue after installing xenapp7.6 with load balanced portal to the ddc`s
It seems i only can ping or get access to portal if using real ip address behind cisco switch from other subnets in my network.
I can ping ddc01 and ddc02 and connect to the portal with http without problem. However when i triy to access the load balancing address of the ddc`s
it wont answer to ping or http
In same subnett it is no problem connecting to the load balancing address of the ddc`s, but in loactions on other subnets i only can access real server ip
eks
dd01 192.168.1.4 ok ping and access behind cisco switch from subnets
ddc02 192.168.1.5 ok to ping access behind cisco switch from subnets
load balancing for both ddc 192.168.1.6 not able to get answer og access from subnets, only in same subnett
Is there any way to configure switch to access the load balancing address of the ddc`s ?
Regards
Pål Arne Røberg

Wrong forum. This forum is dedicated to feedback related to CSC framework itself. You should not wish for response here.
Moved by moderator, no longer apply.

Similar Messages

How to view the login log in window NPS after login cisco switch and without SQL server database

how to view the login log in window NPS after login cisco switch and without SQL server database
in summary
there is only log with event id 4400
A LDAP connection with domain controller XCPAWS20.cyberport.noc for domain NOC2 is established.

Hi adil,
For your issue, you can create a custom security token service (STS) and then set up a trust relationship between a SharePoint 2010 farm and the custom STS.
For more information, you can refer to the articles:
http://forums.asp.net/t/1335229.aspx?Sharing+Authentication+Ticket+Between+ASP+NET+and+Sharepoint
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff955607(v=office.14).aspx
http://www.paraesthesia.com/archive/2011/02/01/working-with-windows-identity-foundation-in-asp-net-mvc.aspx/
Best Regards,
Eric
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

Load balancing from the BI portal

Hi everybody,
We have a BW system with two application servers.
When we use BEx, the load balancing leads the user to the application server that is used less.
When we use the portal, everything goes over the central server.
Does anybody know how we can set up load balancing from the BI portal ?
Kind regards,
Marc van Eijndt

The web dispatcher for your portal should do the load balancing... usually the scenario is the other way round - BEX tends to use the server irrespective of its load and Portal will hit the load balancer and hence lead to better performance ....

Virtual Hosts for Load Balancing

Hi all,
So I have two identical servers, that have SOA Suite installed pointing to the same database. (RHEL 4) I have configured the mod_oc4j.conf file for round robin, and then I created a virtual host on the httpd.conf file to point to the load balance hardware.
It worked! But with a slight issue. The Load Balance server is orasoaqa.tmpw.net:7777, which opens the main Application Server page. However, when I click on BPEL console, or ESB, it continues using the orasoaqa.tmpw.net:7777 virtual, which of course, breaks even trying to login.
What am I missing here? Here's the entry I added to mod_oc4j.conf:
Oc4jSelectMethod roundrobin:local
Here's the entry I added to the httpd.conf on server 1:
Port 7777
Listen 7777
NameVirtualHost XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:7777
<VirtualHost orasoaqaapp101.ma.tmpw.net:7777>
ServerName orasoaqa.tmpw.net
ServerAlias orasoaqaapp101.ma.tmpw.net
Port 7777
</VirtualHost>
and on server 2:
Port 7777
Listen 7777
NameVirtualHost XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:7777
<VirtualHost orasoaqaapp102.ma.tmpw.net:7777>
ServerName orasoaqa.tmpw.net
ServerAlias orasoaqaapp102.ma.tmpw.net
Port 7777
</VirtualHost>
Yes, the port for Application Server and the port on the Load Balancer are exactly the same, I hope this isn't the issue.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Message was edited by:
CooperHawkes

Seeing that you have an external load balancer available, you really should not be trying software load balancing. Windows NLBS is a software based load balancing and is not really dependent on the physical/virtual hosting of the OS. There are certain gotchas
w.r.t the NLB modes since they depend on network protocols such as arp, propagation of MAC addresses and usage of the MAC in the L2 routing tables of network devices.
You should be taking the help of the cloud service provider as ONLY they would have an understanding of their underlying networking infrastructure such as VLANS. addressing, routing rules and such.
You could also refer to the VMware support forum for KB's such as
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1006580
Most importantly, NLBS is a base OS related service and you're more likely to get a response in the Windows Server Forum. In the specific case of BizTalk, the Windows NLB is only used for hosting the out of process services such as those associated with
HTTP/s Receive, orchestration published as schemas, web services (asmx) and/or WCF endpoints.
Regards.

Virtual BizTalk Server load balancing

We in process migrating Physical Biztalk server from current datacenter to a cloud based datacenter.
The requirement is the all server deployed that must be ritualized.We are using Citrix load balancer in the new datacenter and VMware 5.1 as host OS.
we were not successful deploying the load balancing with NLB and Software LB within the virtual world.
Please Help

Seeing that you have an external load balancer available, you really should not be trying software load balancing. Windows NLBS is a software based load balancing and is not really dependent on the physical/virtual hosting of the OS. There are certain gotchas
w.r.t the NLB modes since they depend on network protocols such as arp, propagation of MAC addresses and usage of the MAC in the L2 routing tables of network devices.
You should be taking the help of the cloud service provider as ONLY they would have an understanding of their underlying networking infrastructure such as VLANS. addressing, routing rules and such.
You could also refer to the VMware support forum for KB's such as
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1006580
Most importantly, NLBS is a base OS related service and you're more likely to get a response in the Windows Server Forum. In the specific case of BizTalk, the Windows NLB is only used for hosting the out of process services such as those associated with
HTTP/s Receive, orchestration published as schemas, web services (asmx) and/or WCF endpoints.
Regards.

CISCO 3945 Router - ARE POWER SUPPLIES LOAD BALANCED?

CISCO 3945 Routers - Are the 3945 Router power supplies load balanced by default?
We are trying to determine if our switch/server rack at our remote location has maxed out it's power load requirements. I just need to know if the 3945 power supplies load balance by default or if the redundant power supply is ON but not really providing the router with power and is just there incase the other power supply fails - Thank you.

Thank you for your reply. I had read that the "Cisco 3845 and 3845-NOVPN router accommodates two hot-swappable power supplies and a single power supply meets router requirements. The second power supply provides redundancy, load sharing, and increased router availability. Either power supply can be removed without affecting router operation. Any combination of two power supplies is permitted."
Unfortunately, I couldn't find any specific information for the 3900 series routers that stated it also load balanced power.
Follow-up question: Do you know if the 3800 series routers load share by default? I know it is capable of power load sharing based on the above description but do they load share equally by default? If that's the case for the 3800's then hopefully that's the case for the 3900'S series routers. Which means, we have not maxed out our power requirements in our racks.

Cisco Switches and HP Interoperability with Spanning-Tree (RSTP)

Hello All.
I read a lot of information from this forum about Spaning-Tree interoperability between HP Switches and Cisco Switches.
Rather than having questions I would like to post that I manage to configure successfully HP and Cisco using RSTP (802.1w).
SWPADRAO]display stp root
MSTID Root Bridge ID        ExtPathCost IntPathCost Root Port
  0    32768.cc3e-5f3a-2939 0           0
[SWPADRAO]display stp brief
MSTID      Port                         Role STP State     Protection
  0        GigabitEthernet1/0/47        DESI FORWARDING    NONE
  0        GigabitEthernet1/0/48        DESI FORWARDING    NONE
[SWPADRAO]display stp instance 0
-------[CIST Global Info][Mode RSTP]-------
CIST Bridge         :32768.cc3e-5f3a-2939
Bridge Times        :Hello 2s MaxAge 20s FwDly 15s MaxHop 20
CIST Root/ERPC      :32768.cc3e-5f3a-2939 / 0
CIST RegRoot/IRPC   :32768.cc3e-5f3a-2939 / 0
CIST RootPortId     :0.0
BPDU-Protection     :enabled
Bridge Config-
Digest-Snooping     :disabled
TC or TCN received :17
Time since last TC :0 days 0h:1m:52s
SWNHAM17#show spanning-tree VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp
Root ID    Priority    32768
            Address     cc3e.5f3a.2939
            Cost        4
            Port        26 (GigabitEthernet0/2)
            Hello Time   2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec  Bridge ID Priority    61441 (priority 61440 sys-id-ext 1)
            Address     001b.54db.7200
            Hello Time   2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
            Aging Time 300 Interface        Role Sts Cost      Prio.Nbr Type
Gi0/1            Altn BLK 4         128.25   P2p
Gi0/2            Root FWD 4         128.26   P2p
SWNHAM18#show spanning-tree VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp
Root ID    Priority    32768
            Address     cc3e.5f3a.2939
            Cost        4
            Port        26 (GigabitEthernet0/2)
            Hello Time   2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec  Bridge ID Priority    61441 (priority 61440 sys-id-ext 1)
            Address     001b.0cbc.4300
            Hello Time   2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
            Aging Time 300 Interface        Role Sts Cost      Prio.Nbr Type
Gi0/1            Desg FWD 4         128.25   P2p
Gi0/2            Root FWD 4         128.26   P2p

Hello, David.
Your command doesn't work because it's made only for tha ports that has command "spanning-tree portfast" in them. Try change spanning tree mode at the HP switch to MSTP if this is possible.

Cisco Switches and Dell EqualLogic PS series integration

Scanrio: In head office there is Dell EqualLogic PS series and in branch also same for replicaiotn from head office to branch i want to know the ios feature set of Switch and Router.

If the Dell EqualLogic systems are using iSCSI to communicate there is no specific feature required on the Cisco gear. The Cisco gear will pass iSCSI traffic just like any other IP traffic.
Make sense?
Cheers,
Brad

Coyotepoint E350 and OracleAs 10g Hardware Load Balancing SSL

Hi:
Has anyone been successful using a CoyotePoint E350 with XCEL SSL accelerator card and OracleAS 10g with SSL to hardware load balance an HTTPS site?

You're on the right track adding the SSL certificate to the Load Balancer. I'm not really sure what you mean 'without the use of Webcache'? However, if I had the choise, I'd always add the certificate to the Load Balancer.
A good document setting up a load balanced environment is the Enterprise Deployment Guide. Chapter 8 describes the tasks for a Forms environment.
Regards,
Martin

Cisco switches and 802.1.x

Hi, there !
I have a question for you.
Cisco all switches, is it impossible to present for 802.1x ?
I try to put a network access server in our network to authenticate.
Thanks.
I will wait your answer.
Regards.

Most Cisco switches will handle 802.1x, but it depends on the switch and the OS. Which specific ones are you considering?
Wes

Cisco SA 520W set up for load balancing but traffic not routing properly?

Forgive me cause my networking skills are a bit rusty. So we have an SA520W that sits in-between both of our ISP connections. One connection is 4 bonded T-1s and the other is a shared 50/20. I have configured the SA520W with the optional port set to load balancing. I set the protocol bindings to be HTTP and HTTPS to go over the optional WAN which is the 50/20 yet when I do speedtests I am getting very mixed results. Sometimes it reflects that I am on the 50/20 and other times I just get 5 down and 5 up. and then other times it is a mix between the two, like 5 down 15 up.
It is just weird. I don't understand am I missing some other protocols I need to bind other than HTTP and HTTPS? It isn't just speed tests either I have noticed some weird web page loading issues as well. You can go to a page and it loads really fast and then later on...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi accidentexchange,
Did you fail to log in when accessing the SA 520W thru both HTTP and HTTPS?
https://LAN_IP_address_of_SA520W/
http://LAN_IP_address_of_SA520W/
Furthermore, can you give us an overview of your network topology and user info. If possible, can you provide us the configuration and dbglogs from your SA 520W so that I can forward to the development team?
To get the dbglog from SA520W, login through web UI and in the browser enter the following URL:
https://LAN_IP_address_of_SA520W/scgi-bin/dbglog.cgi
These logs will store password, so please remove any password sensitive information. Also if you are not comfortable posting the dbglog on the community, you can send it directly to me through private message.
Cheers,
Julio

Routing issue between Cisco device and Virtual machine

Hi Guys,
We have two local subnets in a virtualized environment, subnet 1 has a VM operating as a firewall, we would like all traffic for subnet 2 to go via VM on subnet 1, this will police traffic on subnet 2 and then reroute.
The infrastructure involved comprises,
Internet Edge Switch -> ASA -> Core Switch -> IBM Flex chassis
The Internet edge switch is directly connected between the ISP routers and the Cisco ASA firewall pair (A/S). The ASA is then connected to the Core switch. Connected from the core switch is an IBM Flex chassis, via a port channel (all vlans allowed)
The local subnets in question are as follows:
Vlan 101 (10.1.1.0/24)
Vlan 102 (10.2.1.0/24)
The VM in question has two NIC cards having IP address of both subnets.
NIC 1: 10.1.1.1
NIC 2: 10.2.1.1
We would like packets destined for 10.2.1.1 to land on 10.1.1.1 IP address. At the moment traffic for each vlan routes from the outside to their respective local subnets successfully, what we are having difficulty with is directing traffic for subnet 2 via subnet 1 VM firewall.
At the moment we have tried adding a static route on the core switch but it didn’t work
ip route 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.1
I will appreciate if you could share your knowledge and guide me how to achieve this goal.
Thanks in advance :-)

Hi,
I think for this to work you need a transit vlan between the VMs and the core switch. So, if you have 2 vlans on the VM (101 and 102) you use the VM switch to route between the vlans and in order to go outside the local vlans you would use the core switch. In this scenario you would not have an SVI (layer-3) interface on the core. The only thing that core will have is the layer-2 vlans (101 and102). You would than need a static route on the core switch to point to the transit vlan on the VM side.
so, for example, if the transit vlan is vlan 110 and the ip is 192.168.1.0/24
on the core you have static routes:
ip route 10.1.1.0/24 192.168.1.2 (VM side)
ip route 10.1.2.0/24 192.168.1.2 (VM side)
You also need an SVI for vlan 110 with ip address 192.168.1.1/24 on the core.
on the VM you need a default route to point to the core (192.168.1.1).
Is this what you are trying to do?
HTH

Cisco Switching and Apple Computers

I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running Macs' on their Cisco networking equipment. It seems to only be one generation of IMacs' that disable ports on our switches. I do realize many variables may have a role in disabling port settings but it's only a chosen few that it happens with. Not having the authority to program each port being disabled to run in full duplex mode versus default settings from manufacturing in auto-negotiate I'm at a loss. Even after explaining the solution, nothing gets done. My question is could someone post some documentation of some sort backing up my theories? Also if anyone could please include anything about proper port settings for access points on our VLANs that also become disabled at times. I do know through research done that all access points should be classified as such on the network. Am I correct in stating this also? I thank you in advance for any information or help you may provide for me and posts will be rated.

check out the following links, hope this helps :
Using VLANs with Cisco Aironet Wireless Equipment :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps4570/products_configuration_example09186a00801d0815.shtml
Wireless Virtual LAN Deployment Guide :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00801444a1.html

How to set up Qos for Microsoft Lyncs 2013 in cisco Switches and Router

Hi
as i am new to Qos part , please send the complete qos configuration command has to apply in my cisco 2960s switchs as well as 4506 chassis(L3 mode act as my router).
as i know from microsoft, DSCP 46 and 34 should give highest priory
please send the completed configuration for priorities this DSCP
thanks
Sujish

Hi,there,
The rule setting should be same as in Exchange 2010,you can configure it via outlook or OWA if you have full access permission. I also believe it should be something related to Repliation,would you please check the event log to see if the
AD and Exchange replication has completed.
In some cases, replication can take longer depending on how many AD sites and Exchange servers in the environment:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/148381
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/158989
Hope these useful!
Regards,
Sharon
Sharon Shen
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question.

Cisco NAC and Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

Hi all
Does it posiable to implement NAC on VDI infrastructure?
If it can can you post some link?
THanks
Regards

MosielleKwan wrote:
Has anyone know ESSO support VDI client yet ?The current version does not support virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI).
This must go as an Enhancement Request .

Cisco switches and virtual ip address(load balancing address) on xenapp portals

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for