Cisco Unity Connection single inbox and viewmail error

Unity Connection 8.5.1 single inbox with Exchange 2010 and viewmail 8.5.4. We arein the process of migrating from Unity 7.0.2 to Unity Connection.
We are a lawfirm and many of our admins have full access to their attorney's exchange mailbox to manage their messages and voicemails. With Connection those admins can no longer access voicemails in exchange accounts other than their own even if they have full access.
A message pops up stating "the requested voice message is no longer available" and only dead air is played whether playback via phone or speakers is selected. This is a huge issue for our end users.
Has anyone else experienced this or hav eany suggestions for a work around?
I have tried assigning the mailbox access delegation role to an end user but this did not grant access via vewmail.
Thanks
Liz

Hi Liz,
This is expected behavior because VMO has certain dependencies mapped between users and messages, so when a different user tries to access the message, it can't find the mapping which is why you receive that message. However, VMO 8.6(4) introduced the ability for this exact group mailbox access feature you're after.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/vmo/release/notes/864cucvmorn.html#wp346504
Hope that helps,
Brad

Similar Messages

Cisco Unity Connection Single inbox with Exchange 2010

I have a new installation of Unity Connection 8.6.2 using single inbox with an Exchange 2010 cluster frontended by a Netscaler load balancer.Functionality that does not work is when a new message comes into outlook and the message is read or deleted it does not update the status on the phone- IE turn off the MWI or if the message is deleted it is still a new message in Unity. If you click reset in the user unified message account, the status gets updated.
TAC says its a blocked port on Exchange TCP 7080 but that is open.

I followed this document :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/unified_messaging/guide/85xcucumg020.html
but when i try to integrate CUC with exchange 2010 , i didn't find is clear enough
do you have Step by Step more clear than that link becouse my lab very close to your case.
Regards

Cisco Unity Connection : Web Inbox

Hi
We are using Cisco Unity Connection (Ver 8.5.1ES47.12900-47), we have configured a Web Inbox manually for a User. It was working fine till yesterday , but from yesterday when the user logs in the Web Inbox the browser window just shows that its loading (Please see the attached screenshot) and nothing happens. We have reset the password of the Web Inbox user thinking that its encountering a known Bug, but it did not fix the issue.
We tried logging in with IE 11, Firefox and Chrome, we restarted the Cisco Tomcat service, but it still did not fix the issue. Please see the attached screen-shot for the error encountered.
Your inputs to resolve this issue are appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Ram.

Its most likely a compatibility issue. IE 11 is not supported for WebInbox with CUC 8.5,
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/compatibility/matrix/cucclientmtx.html
If you still face issue, you can open a TAC case. This will require detailed log analysis.

Cisco Unity Connection 8.X and Cisco UCS

Hi
We are in a planning phase for Unity Connection 8.X on Cisco UCS C-Series. The Cisco Unified Communications SRND 8.0 states that requires reserving one physical core per physical server.
what does it really mean?

See sample depiction below of applications and physical core usage on a server with 2 CPUs and 8 total physical cores. In white is the reservation of one physical core.
Regards.

Unity Connection 8.5(x), single inbox, and smartphones

If the customer sets up the following environment:
Unity Connection 8.5(x) WITH SECURE MESSAGING
Single Inbox with Exchange 2010
Customer has smartphones (blackberry, etc).
We're trying to figure out if this is set up, will the smart phones be able to play the voicemail message or not? Based on what I see, I'm thinking they may not, but would love to hear from someone with eyes and ears back in the BU.
Cliff

They would not be able to play the message. From the Unified Messaging Guide:
To play secure Connection voice messages in the Exchange mailbox, users must use Microsoft Outlook and Cisco Unity Connection ViewMail for Microsoft Outlook. Without ViewMail for Outlook installed, users accessing secure voice messages see only text in the body of a decoy message; the text briefly explains secure messages.
In other words, the Blackberry phones don't have ViewMail and can only see the decoy message.

Cisco Unity Connection 8.5 Single Inbox - Unified Messaging?

For the Cisco Unity Connection 8.5, to enable Single inbox unified messaging do we need to get additional licensing for this feature?

Hi Ali,
LicIMAPSubscribersMax
Users with IMAP access to voice messages or with single inbox (single inbox available in Connection 8.5 and later only)
Sets the maximum number of users who can use:
•A third-party IMAP client to access voice messages.
•The unified messaging feature "Synchronize Connection and Exchange Mailboxes (Single Inbox)" on the Unified Messaging > Unified Messaging Services page and on the Users > Users > Unified Messaging Accounts page.
For single inbox, the total number of users in classes of service for which single inbox is enabled must not exceed the licensed maximum. This applies regardless of the number of users in those classes of service who are configured to use single inbox. In addition, all users who are configured for single inbox must be in a class of service for which single inbox is enabled.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/administration/guide/8xcucsag310.html
Cheers!
Rob
"And if I should fall behind
Wait for me" - Springsteen

Single Inbox Issue with Unity Connection 8.5 and Exchange 2003

Hello Unity Gurus,
I recently upgraded our Unity server to Unity Conenction 8.5. We are pressing hard to have unified messaging. However theres always problems it seems.
We have several 2003 exchange servers, two of the exchange servers split up our organization and one has half of the users mailboxes and the other server has the remaining half. So far the only way that I can get Unified messaging is if I create two separate Unified Messaging Services one for one half, the other for the other half.
This becomes a problem since now when I create the Unified Message account I have to know what server the user is on and the problem being is that I have 700 voicemail users ill have to look up. Not only that but, if our employees move from one site to the next and if the mailbox gets moved then I imagine most likely break unified messaging for that account.
I've read the install guide for Unity connection Unified Messaging and I understand that the second option is to have Connection to search for Exchange servers via Active Directory however, when I set that up and test it via unified messaging services I get an error " searching network...failed to locate domain controller via DNS. Failed to locate an exchange 2003 server."
DNS seems to work if I create single Unified Messaging Service and use the host name that way.
Anyone have any thoughts or found a work around to this issue?
Thanks,
Dan

We have 41 exchange UM services configured in Unity Connection on 10 clusters, each one to the 2003 exchange servers. This is the only way it will work for us, as e2k3 can not search for and find other exchange services. For 2010, it is able to search by AD domain and site name, and we only have one connector configured on each server to the e2k10 environment. I believe this is the way it works, and is difficult to manage but works. Just my two cents.

Cisco Unity Connection ViewMail Password manual reset after LDAP change

Unity Connection 8.5.1, Viewmail 8.5.4 and Exchange 2010 with 2008 AD
We are migrating to Unity Connection from Unity 7.0.2 and have discovered that when we change our passwords in AD (scheduled every 40 days) this does not get synchronized with viewmail. Users then receive an error indicating the user ID or password is incorrect and then call the helpdesk to find out where to change this setting. Has anyone found a way around this. It is becomking a huge issue with 1200+ employees.
Hopefully it is on a roadmap for cisco as well?
Thanks
Liz

'its really a different user experience' you are telling me!!!
I like the other features that 8.5 brings but the outlook viewmail single sign on design fault is a big mistake. It even effects cupc client as you have to update the voicemail password in their...
I did read all the documentation carefully, it doesnt mention that the passwords do no sync. From a end user point of view, this is a disator. 95% of our users manage the voicemail through outlook, if the password doesnt update in viewmail then they can not retrieve their voicemail.
anyway, i ve spent alot of time and money building the new connection server, but i have no option but to stick to our unity 5 solution. Luckily i noticed this before i changed/migrated people groupwide.
Thanks a million Cisco, I now have to explain this to our IT director....

Unity Connection 8.6.2 report error and issues

Hello,
I found some other hits on this error and tried the workarounds (restarting tomcat, and report data harvester) but am still getting "Unable to find any report data based on parameter(s)" for a certain timeframe on multiple reports when I know activity occurred in that timeframe.
User Phone login report, Outcall Billing Detail Report, others.
CUC version is 8.6.2.20000-2
Problem is during this timeframe someone dialed into system and changed the transfer extensions to various LD numbers throughout an entire day and the reports aren't showing these outcalls. Call Manager CDR data show the calls being placed from Unity VM ports and the Unity Conversation Manager traces I grabbed for the timeframe show the calls to those numbers to. I'm just trying to match up with a report and figure out if there is some other log or trace file I can look to determine for sure the caller logged in to the voicemail box and changed the transfer extension on it. (guessed the voicemaill password). The failed log in report doesn't even show the failed login attempt in output from traces below. The transfer extension dest addr was different on the transfers on this same mailbox. Have locked down the system since but want to get better grip on this with the reports and traces.
I looked over the CUC 8.6.2 SU1 and SU2 release notes and not seeing any resolved bugs for these matters either.
Here are some samples lines from Conversation Manager traces:
00:32:46.399 HDR|02/04/2013 ,Significant
00:32:46.399 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9
00:33:55.006 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:33:58.955 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:34:37.090 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDL,11,CCsCdlImsAccess::AuthenticateSubscriber: Cannot authenticate user: JOESMITH IMS Result Code: 1 on line 108 of file CdlIms/src/CsCdlImsAccess.cpp: Error: 0x80046505 Description: E_CDL_SP_EXEC_FAILURE
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDE,3,Authentication Failed for Subscriber 555123 (Src/CsCallSubscriber.cpp 2969)
00:34:50.404 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,-1,-1,An invalid password entered when trying to log into a user mailbox. Details - [].
00:36:29.331 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:36:33.484 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:44:53.444 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6
00:45:20.019 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:45:24.121 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
Thanks

Hello ebergquist,
As advised we could try to run a report before an upgrade was performed to verify if it will pull the information, which in the event it does we would be matching the bug, therefore access the CUC CLI and type the following command: file get install *
You will be required to have an SFTP available for the file transfer and port 22 open on the sftp client.
Once you receive the files you would need to check system-history.log, below is an example.
=======================================
Product Name -    Cisco Unity Connection
Product Version - 8.5.1.12900-7
Kernel Image -    2.6.9-89.0.20.EL
=======================================
02/24/2013 13:35:02 | root: Boot 8.5.1.12900-7 Start
02/24/2013 16:03:45 | root: Install 8.5.1.12900-7 Success
Once you check the time stamp and date of the upgrade try to gather a report for a time range before the upgrade was performed, even though they might be overwritten, there still could be a possibility that it succeeds.
If this bug is not the issue then you might want to take into consideration:
1. Make sure that the service ReportDB is [STARTED] in the output of the command: utils service list.
2. If you have Digital Networking on your server make sure there is no stalled replication. Go to RTMT (Real Time Monitoring Tool)> Syslogs> Select on the dropdown your server> Doble click on Application logs> CiscoSyslog. You can then do a manual search or sort with the filter option:
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Hit apply. Below is an example:
Date: Feb 19 08:01:15
Machine Name: LAB1111
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Message: : 1151681: LAB1111.corpnet2.com: Feb 19 2013 08:01:11.662 UTC : UC_UCEVNT-3-EvtReplicatorStalledReceiveReplication %[ClusterID=][NodeID=LAB1111]: Detected stalled replication receiving from location LAB1111. Waiting for missing USN 2222. This situation may indicate network connectivity problems.
3.Make sure that replication is working properly in the cluster. You can check them via the following commands: showcuc cluster status    and   utils dbreplcation runtimestate
For the TransferEx that you state changed to ceros -> TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK , this is just a hexadecimal value that is returned stating that the transfer that took place during the call was successful, in this case the actual transfer was to the following destination -> TransferEx destAddr='715551231234', and was during a call to ->calledID='555123' , this does not have to do with the actual change of a transfer number performed by a user.
Those traces won't be enough you will have to additionally set: ConvSub, level 3   and CDE, level 16 so that you may see output in the traces as the example posted in the previous thread.
Traces would be the path to follow in order to verify the user that changed the transfer rule, as this is as i understand the goal your pursuing.
However if it is of any help, another way to get on hold of the numbers that were updated on the Transfer Rule is to use the User Data Dump tool, this information reflects changes regardless of whether it was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface) or GUI (Graphic User Interface). For more information on the tool go to:
http://ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/UserDataDump/Help/UserDataDump.htm
Traces are extensive to be reviewed if done manually, however you can do a text search with a tool as Notepad ++ to look for keywords as "NewTransferNumber =" or "CDE,16,Transfer allowed", once you find this you check the call GUIDwhich is the reference number of the call and that exists during the entire length of the call, whether it is while a person is leaving a voicemail or the user is accessing his/her's inbox. This would speed up your search.
So as explained in the first thread you would then do another text search returning all possible matches with that callGUID.
Now if you get to the very beginning of the call you would see something like:
Line 13712: 18:58:05.156 |24720,CCIE-1-001,0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='2199' callerName='' calledID='6789' redirectingID='' lastRedirectingID='' reason=1=DirectlastReason=1024=Unknown] port=CCIE-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=1callGuid=0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4
In this example you see my test user callerID='2199' calling the Pilot number 6789 which is the voicemail button
calledID='6789, and the what type of call is it whether Forward or Direct, when logging to voicemail you are going to see Direct which is going to match the Direct Routing Rules and send the call to the attempt sign in conversation.
The other approach is a rule out method between the Audit traces and the User Data Dump tool.
So let's say you have a baseline document that states all of the Transfer numbers for all users.
If the User Data Dump reflects a different number and the Audit logs do not show any change, starting from the time the baseline was created and the point of time where the number was changed, then you could deduce the change was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface). Unfortunately you wouldn't be able to tell who did the change in this case.
Nevertheless, remember that a user may have for example an Alternate Extension so the change might not necessarily be done from the office phone: "Alternate extensions can make calling Cisco Unity Connection from an alternate device—such as a mobile phone, a home phone, or a phone at another work site—more convenient. When you specify the phone number for an alternative extension, Connection handles all calls from that number in the same way that it handles calls from a primary extension (assuming that ANI or caller ID is passed along to Connection from the phone system). This means that Connection associates the alternate phone number with the user account, and when a call comes from that number, Connection prompts the user to enter a PIN and sign in."
Best regards,
David Rojas
Cisco TAC Support Engineer, Unity
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 1-407- 241-2965 ext 6406
Mon, Wed, and Fri 12:00 pm to 9:00 pm ET, Tue and Thu 8:00 am to 5:00pm ET
Cisco Worldwide Contact link is below for further reference.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_worldwide_contacts.html

Error during upgrading Cisco Unity Connection to SU2

Help!
I'm facing an error while upgrading Cisco Unity Connection 8.5.1.10000-26 to SU2 (8.5.1.12900-7).
When it's trying to download the SU2 file (UCSInstall_UCOS_8.5.1.12900-7.sgn.iso ) to Unity Connection after 2GB I get this error:
Error encountered: Upgrade has detected that the ISO file name has been changed from the original name. This is not allowed. MD5 Hash Value: 32:32:db:47:99:48:c6:53:12:e2:78:76:94:90:a4:1d
I tried this from multlpe FTP servers and I downloaded the SU2 file multlpe times assuming the download was bad. I also rebooted the Unity Connection server here and there assuming it was something with the server.
I first tried SU1, but that gave the same error, so I attempted to go with SU2.
Any ideas for resolving this?
Thank you!
-rya

Hi Rya,
OK...well you've certainly done your due diligence here
Did you run an MD5 check after the download to compare the file values?
I had a long look for bugs related to this issue and came up empty so I can't see
a bug being the cause of the issues here. Is it possible for you to try "burning" the
upgrade .iso to a DVD and trying again?
I am also curious why you wouldn't move straight to 8.5(1)SU4
Cheers!
Rob
"Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen

Failure to upgrade Cisco Unity Connection 8.6.2 to 9.1.2

Hi everybody.
Has someone that can help me with follow problem?
I making a Cisco Unity Connection upgrade from version: 8.6.2.20000-76 to 9.1.2.10000-28. But unfortunately we can't sucessfull to make this process.
On the finish of this process, I can see this outup error:
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_manager.sh|Cleanup exiting - Cached Data: [Vendor= VMware, Inc.
HWModel=VMware
CPUCount=2
CPUType= Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2643 0 @ 3.30GHz
CPUSpeed=3300
MEMSize=6144
BIOSVer=PhoenixTechnologiesLTD 6.00 06/22/2012
ObjectId=1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1348
OSVersion=UCOS 5.0.0.0-2
SerialNumber= VMware-56 4d e0 4f 4d 85 87 7b-eb 22 0e 52 a7 73 1a 22
VendorOID=1.3.6.1.4.1.674]|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Cleaning up download...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Cleanup upgrade source area.|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Ejecting DVD (/dev/sda1)|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Removing /common/download/9.1.2.10000-28|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Started auditd...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Started setroubleshoot...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Changed selinux mode to enforcing|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Cleaning up rpm_archive...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Removing /common/rpm-archive/9.1.2.10000-28|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|IOWAIT monitor stopped|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|File:/usr/local/bin/base_scripts/upgrade_install.sh:599, Function: main(), Upgrade Failed -- (1)|<LVL::Error>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|set_upgrade_result: set to 1|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|is_upgrade_lock_available: Upgrade lock is not available.|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|is_upgrade_in_progress: Already locked by this process (pid: 14477).|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|release_upgrade_lock: Releasing lock (pid: 14477)|<LVL::Debug>
Best Regards,
Claudio Costa
A mensagem foi editada por: Claudio Costa

Tks Manish, I just perform a restart on the both nodes on my CUC cluster and after that I did can install this upgrade patch.
Also is very important install the upgrade patch on all servers of the cluster before perform a switch-version on the publisher and then on the others nodes.
Best Regards,
Claudio Costa

Cisco Unity Connection not relaying voicemails outside the organization

Hi all, we are running Cisco Unity Connection version: 8.6.2ES25.21900-25. It has been set up to accept voicemails for Exchange 2010 users (in other words email messages with WAV attachments) and deliver these to their inboxes; this works with no problem.
I have two users who would like to receive these emails at their outside account, however the messages are never sent. I have tried the following:
Changed the users corporate email addresses from "[email protected]" to "[email protected]"
Unchecked the option to "Generate SMTP Proxy Address From Corporate Email Address."
On the "Message Actions" page for their account I have configured voicemail and email to "Relay the message" and entered their external SMTP addresses.
Confirmed the smart host setup is OK (points to our Exchange 2010 CAS which has firewall rules in place to permit it to send mail outside the organization.
Confirmed the Exchange 2010 CAS will accept SMTP messages from the subnet the Unity Connection server resides in.
If I switch the user SMTP settings BACK to their original internal SMTP addresses for my company the messages are then immediately delivered properly to these addresses. This signifies to me that Unity is periodically trying to send these items but they just aren't going out. No sign of the messages in any user report I ran in Unity nor message tracking in Exchange.
I also tried setting up an Outlook rule to forward these voicemail messages to the recipients external addresses but this did not work and after doing some research I see that the way in which Unity delivers the messages to these recipients internally (via EWS) is the reason why. I wonder if this is the same reason these are not going out to their external SMTP addresses.
Thanks for any assistance provided!

Look at the transfer options for that particular user and make sure it's set to ring the phone, that configuration is PER user.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Cisco Unity Connection 8.6 problem with greeting upload

Hello at all,
i have a realy strange Problem.
I want to upload a Greeting (*.wav-file) to a Call Handler, everything looks fine after uploading and i can also hear (Playback) the massage on the Computer and on my Phone. So i save the Config. After that i want to hear the massage after calling the Call Handler but i hear only "sorry, "CallHandlerName" is not Awailable".
If i make some checks everything looks ok, i have 2 User with sysadmin-role - both can Playback the massage via the Webpage.
But if i take the Phone and call the "Greetings Administrator" - there is no personal Greeting on this Call Handler - and thats my Problem.
If i Record a new massage with the Phone (in the Greeting Admin) it is working - after Uploading a new File (Codec is ok) i can Playback the new file but after Calling the CH, i hear the Massage which i have recordet with the Phone - not the Uploadet. But on the Webpage i hear the Uploadet file.....
Whats wrong????
And yes, i have set this 2 Users as Call Handler Owner.
What should i do??
Please can anyone help me in this case.....
kind regards
Markus
EDIT: I have also the Problem, that i can´t upload a File for a User - only the User self can Upload a Greeting, if do this with one of the 2 Admin-Accounts i hear also the System-Massage "sorry, -USERNAME- is not awailaible" and not the uploadet file - at the Webpage i hear the uploadet Massage - it seems to be the same Prob as with the CallHandler. Is it a JAVA-Problem mabye? I have Java JRE Version7 update7 installed and IE8 as Browser....
Certificate is installed, and the CUC is a trusted site......

Hi Markus,
It could be this bug;
CSCto92753 - Unable to upload wav files and save as greeting or send as message
Description
Symptom:
Unable to upload an existing wav file, or create a new recording using the PC microphone and save as greeting, voice name, or send as message. In the case of trying to send as a message, the user receives a "Failed to Send Message" error.
You might see Failed to Record Name if attempting to overwrite a Call Handler with a file.
You might also see Unable to save recording due to SSL certificate error.
Conditions:
Cisco Unity Connection versions 7.1(5)ES45, 8.0(3)ES27, 8.5(1)ES37
When using either the Cisco Unity Connection Administration (CUCA) or the Cisco Unity Connection Personal Communications Assistant (PCA) web applications to upload an existing wav file, or create a new recording using the PC microphone and save as a voice name, greeting, or send as a message.
In the client side Java Console logs, you see the following exception:
Exception in thread "Timeout guard" java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.net.SocketPermission 10.93.231.234:8443 connect,resolve)
Workaround:
In your client side JRE security profile file....commonly named:   java.policy...add the below entry. Will need to use the ipaddress of the Connection server (for a cluster, put an entry for each of publisher and subscriber).
permission java.net.SocketPermission "10.93.237.101:8443", "connect,resolve";
If get a permission error when trying to modify java.policy, then you may need to set the permissions of the file to not inhearent permissions from it's parent and not be read-only. (aka by default the entire JRE folder is read-only but you need to modify a file within it).
A good article on the Sun website with more detail on the workaround:   http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/Programming/JDCBook/appA.html
Details
First Found in:                          (4)
8.6,7.1(5)ES44,8.0(3)ES27
8.5(1)ES37
Status:
Terminated
Last Modified:
Aug 12,2012
Product:
Cisco Unity Connection
Platform:
Dependent
Severity:
3 - moderate
Cheers!
Rob
"May your heart always be joyful
May your song always be sung" - Bob Dylan

Cisco Unity Connection 8.6 - Cannot Upload Greeting

Hello! I am running Unity Connection 8.6, using VMWare, in my home lab. When I try to upload a greeting to my System Call Handler, I get the following:
Unable to save recording due to SSL Certificate error. Would you like to accept the SSL certificate for this session and attempt to save the recording again?
When I choose OK I receive:
Failed to record name
Site: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unity-connection-version-70/110950-unity-wav-issues.html#certerr
I visited the above site and tried importing the certificate into both Firefox and IE, but that did not seem to work. I also looked into Cisco Bug ID CSCto92753, but that also did not work. I looked at the Java Console Log and did a search for "access denied":
com.cisco.unity.mediamaster.MMApplet.stop() - Exception while saving preferences: access denied ("java.io.FilePermission" "C:\Users\Lalo\.cisco\unity\mediamaster\mm.properties" "read")
I modified my java.policy file to include the below, but I get the same error:
grant codeBase "file:${{java.ext.dirs}}/*" {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
permission java.io.FilePermission "C:\Users\Lalo\.cisco\unity\mediamaster\mm.properties", "write";
At this point and I am stuck. Thanks in advance for reading my post and for your assistance.
Cisco Unity Connection version: 8.6.2ES120.24901-120
Windows 7 Enterprise 32-bit
Browsers: Firefox 28.0 and IE 9
Java Version 7 Update 55 (Also tried Java Runtime Environment 1.6.0.39)

I ran in to these same symptoms and have been fighting it for a while. I have not ultimately found a solution but I found the following workaround which allowed me to get my greetings uploaded until a better solution can be found. I am posting it here in case it might work for others in a pinch.
Workaround:
Open the mediamaster applet on the appropriate page and choose to open file
browse to and select the greeting you want to upload
BEFORE clicking save, click the play button in the mediamaster (I have mine set to play via phone, I didn't test via computer). The file uploads and plays.
Then click save. For some reason, this seems to have properly uploaded the greeting without any errors.
I hope this is helpful to someone who is running in to this same frustrating error.
Jon

Cisco Unity Connection cluster issue

Hello,
I have a Cisco Untiy Connection cluster of two servers, one publisher and one subscriber. They are running software: 7.1.3ES43.33034-43. Yesterday at about 8:43 I lost connection to the subscriber server. I could still ping it but was unable to get to it via GUI nor SSH. I spoke to TAC yesterday and they told me to simply reboot the server. I was a little concerned about this because I don't want to cause some kind of split-brain effect. I work in a hospital and it is imperative that the voicemail system stay up. My only other option would be to do this at 4:00 am on a Sunday. Any suggestions?
Thanks

Hi David and all,
we have a unity connection 9.x pair. after an IP address change on the subscriber we are getting the error message:
‘Communication is not functioning correctly between the servers in the Cisco Unity Connection cluster’
Both servers respectively show its own status as a publisher but lost communication with the other server (if we check cluster management from either server).
show tech network hosts – displays correct info.
show perf query class "Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication"
==>query class :
- Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication) has instances and values:
ReplicateCount -> Number of Replicates Created = 603
ReplicateCount -> Replicate_State = 2
On both servers the replication is showing as 2 – so its good.
Various reboots have been done, services are up and working and there are no firewalls between server’s .
Any advice appreciated.
TIA…Jeff

Cisco Unity Connection single inbox and viewmail error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for