Cisco wired guest with one wlc

Hello my name is Ivan
I have a question:
You can configure wired guest for wired network users so that appears the cisco wlc web portal for guest user authentication? having the following:
Only one (1) cisco wlc 5508 no settings for auto anchor or foreing controller, a cisco acs v5.4, cisco switches, and access points.
I'm using 802.1x, and when the user because autententicacion policies fall into the guest vlan, the user receives full IP routing vlan guest, comes to internet through the router for guest users, but not redirected to the website of wlc .
I would like to redirect http traffic from cisco switch to the cisco wlc for wlc web portal
My deployment is to flex connect wireless authentication, and local switching center
How I can do this?
Thanks for your answers.

Hi Scott, thanks for your answer:
My scenary is:
Site A Corporate
WLC 5508 Flex Connect Central Auth + Local Switching
1. int management: vlan 10 - 10.1.1.2/24
2. int virtual: 1.1.1.1
3. wired-guest: vlan 30
wlans:
1. corporate - mapped to interface management 802.1x wpa, 2pa2
2. guest - mapped to interface management web auth
3. wired-guest: web auth, ingress wired, egress management
Cisco ACS v5.4
Site B: Branch
AP Ligthweight in the vlan 10, vlans mapped 100 and 30, 100 for wlan corporate and 30 for wlan guest.
Switches Cisco,
The branch have a router of internet to users guest.
The switch cisco have a 802.1x configuration, and the method to authenticate users can not have a supplicant 802.1x is web auth.
Actually i can not redirect the traffic from the switch in the branch to cisco wlc 5508 in the corporate site. The users bypass the interception of the cisco wlc and they can goes to internet without the portal of authentication.
Please could you give and advice to resolv it?
Regards for your answers.

Similar Messages

Wired guest access on WLC 4400 with SW 7.0.240.0

Hello,
after we upgrade our Wlan-controller 4400 from software 7.0.116.0 to 7.0.240.0
wired guest access don't work anymore.
All other things works fine, incl. WLAN guest access!
When we try wired guest access, we get the web-authentication page and can log in.
On the controller we can see that the Policy Manager State changes from WEBAUTH_REQD
to RUN.
But then there is no access to the internet.
We tried also SW 7.0.250.0, same problem!
Log Analysis on the WCS:
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:23 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :The WLAN to which client is connecting does not require 802 1x authentication.
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:23 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client does not have an IP address yet.
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:23 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client L3 authentication is required
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:23 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client Moved to DHCP Required State.
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:26 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Mobility role update request. from Unassociated to Local Peer = 0.0.0.0, Old Anchor = 0.0.0.0, New Anchor = 10.101.200.11
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:26 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Mobility role changed. State Update from Mobility-Incomplete to Mobility-Complete, mobility role=Local, client state=APF_MS_STATE_ASSOCIATED
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:26 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :DHCP successful.
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:26 MEZ Severity :ERROR Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client got an IP address successfully and the WLAN requires Web Auth or Web Auth pass through.
Time :03/12/2014 14:21:26 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client IP address is assigned.
Time :03/12/2014 14:22:01 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Webauth user logged in to the network. manni
Time :03/12/2014 14:22:01 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :AAA response message sent.
Time :03/12/2014 14:22:01 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client has completed Web Auth successfully.
Time :03/12/2014 14:22:01 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client has completed Web Auth successfully.
Trying http://www.google.de .... doesnt work. No Log Entries. Next entries while logging out.
Time :03/12/2014 14:36:20 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Web auth is being triggered again.
Time :03/12/2014 14:36:20 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client L2 authentication has been completed successfully.
Time :03/12/2014 14:36:20 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :Client Moved to DHCP Required State.
Time :03/12/2014 14:36:20 MEZ Severity :INFO Controller IP :10.101.200.11 Message :WebAuth user Logged out from network.
Has someone a idea how to solve this problem?
Regards
Manfred

Hi
Yes got it resolved. It turns out that the connection from the wired guest access port to the WLC must be L2. That is the switch that the wired guest acces sport is connected and WLC are connected to must be L2 only. We were using a single switch to do the testing and it was also doing the routing for the test LAN. Even though there was no L3 VLAN interface configured for the VLAN that the guest access port was on for some reason this breaks it. Absolu Didnt have chance to work out the exact limitations of this as we simply made the switch L2 only and configured an 802.1Q trunk to the Internet router and made subinterfaces on the router for the wired and wireless egress ports and it worked then. No config change was needed on the WLC at all.
The only thing I can think of is that it's something about the way the WLC joins the wired guest access ingress VLAn and egress VLAN. The WLC isn't a reall router it says so in the documentation. I think the packet coming from the wired access port is being bridged to the egress VLAn not routed and this is what screws it up (remeber with a router the source and destination MAC addresses would be changed with a bridge they aren't). Got to be something along those lines. If you have a bigger newtork with a guest anchor WLC handling this function you dont run into this as the traffic is coming over an EOIP tunnle from the remote WLC so the switch with the guest anchor WLC doesnt see the MAC address of the wired guest PC.

ISE with CWA and wired guest access via WLC Anchor

Can an Anchor WLC (WLCa) provide a wired guest LAN service if the wlan guest access is using CWA?
We are deploying a WLAN only ISE solution (it is a full license ISE though) but they just want a few wired guest ports. I was hoping to add L2 switch to the DMZ where the WLCa is and that the L2 switch wouldnt need any other config as the WLCa just bridges the wired to the wlan vlan. This Im sure i have done before.
So now I have set wiredguest the same as i have done before ISE and my wired clients get an IP address, but when they redirect, the URL they get is different, and the redirect just doesnt work.
It comes out as:
https://my_ise_ip:8443/guestportal/Login.action?switch_url=https://my_ise_host/login.html&wlan=my_wired_guest_lan&redirect=www.google.co.uk
So does my simple L2 only switch need an ISE config on it or should the WLCa be handling or the redirection just as it would for a wlan device.

The ISE never receives an auth entry, so i dont believe the redirect is working for the wired client. So even though the clients browser gets a redirect url which fails connection, the client info in the WLCa doesnt have a redirect ACL listed like a wlan client would

Wired Guest on Layer 3 network

HI
Per cco, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/4.2/configuration/guide/c42users.html#wpmkr1074101
I have a WLC running 5.2.193.0 named WLC-CA1 as a foreign WLC which anchors to another WLC-CA2 at a diff site that holds the guest access meaning it goes through a trunk that has a vlan where my DSL/DHCP router resides
I want both WIFI and Wired Guest access from WLC-CA1 assuming it anchors over to WLC-CA2. Guest Wifi works but Guest Wired doesn't. This is because I am on a Layer 3 topology so assume I have to be on Layer 2. Is there a way around this?
Thx

The VLAN that he wired guest users has to be a layer-2 vlan only.

Wired guest access with 5508

Hi
I have setup wireless guest access for a customer with a single 5508 and web authentication no problem at all. He then wanted to test wired guest access. The 5508 is currently connected to a single 3560 switch. The wired clients get a DHCP address OK but cannot reslove DNS and thus don't get redirected to teh guest login portal. I have even tried turning of all L3 security to no avail. The setup is as follows
VLAN 101 access points and 5508 management interface
VLAN 102 wired guest access dynamic ingress (L2 config only no SVI on 3560)
VLAN 103 wireless guest dynamic egress nterface L3 network with SVI on switch
VLAN 104 wired guest dynamic egress interface L3 network with SVI on switch
There are two DHCP pools setup on the WLC one for the VLAN 103 and one for the VLAN 104 subnets.
The internet router is also connected to the 3560 on a sepearte VLAN with an SVI. the 3560 has a default route to teh internet router and teh DHCP pools give the DHCP clients a default gateway of the IP address of dynamic interface 103 or 104. The Internet routre can ping the WLC on both these addresses.
LAG is enabled on teh WLC and VLANs 101-104 are trunked to it from the 3560.
I even tried making the wired guest egress interface the same one as for wireless. The wired clientys now got an IP address on the wireless range but still couldnt pass any traffic. It's like the intrenal bridging on teh WLC between VALN 102 and 104 (or 103) is broken. Tried both the lates 6.x and 7.x software on the WLC. Any ideas ? All the problems I can find with this seem to relate to not gettingas far as a DHCP address but that works fine.
Thanks
Pat

Hi
Yes got it resolved. It turns out that the connection from the wired guest access port to the WLC must be L2. That is the switch that the wired guest acces sport is connected and WLC are connected to must be L2 only. We were using a single switch to do the testing and it was also doing the routing for the test LAN. Even though there was no L3 VLAN interface configured for the VLAN that the guest access port was on for some reason this breaks it. Absolu Didnt have chance to work out the exact limitations of this as we simply made the switch L2 only and configured an 802.1Q trunk to the Internet router and made subinterfaces on the router for the wired and wireless egress ports and it worked then. No config change was needed on the WLC at all.
The only thing I can think of is that it's something about the way the WLC joins the wired guest access ingress VLAn and egress VLAN. The WLC isn't a reall router it says so in the documentation. I think the packet coming from the wired access port is being bridged to the egress VLAn not routed and this is what screws it up (remeber with a router the source and destination MAC addresses would be changed with a bridge they aren't). Got to be something along those lines. If you have a bigger newtork with a guest anchor WLC handling this function you dont run into this as the traffic is coming over an EOIP tunnle from the remote WLC so the switch with the guest anchor WLC doesnt see the MAC address of the wired guest PC.

WLC Guest Internet - Wired Guest Question.

We're currently not running a version on our WLC's that supports wired guests (4.1.185) but am evaluating upgrading to 4.2.112. What is the current limitation of wired guests? Is it 5, curious as to why this is if so. My question develops out of this in this scenerio:
Our main campus is on LWAPP, our secondary campus is not at this point. So the secondary campus is running something different fro Guest access (Chillisoft). I'm curious if a backhaul a vlan over to the other campus that has the Cisco Guest Internet from the WLC and redistribute it from Campus2's core, then add the vlan to the AP's there how this would work out. I know I can get the vlan over there, that's simple and we do it for a few other things, but not sure how well it'd work out for this environment. I 'think' the only thing stopping me would be any wired user limitations, which am curious as to why there is if there is.

There is no need to backhaul the VLAN from one campuis to other. Just configuring the same VLANs induvidually on the APs would do. Here is a deployment guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/technology/guest_access/technical/reference/4.1/GAccess_41.html for WLC.

WLC - Layer 3 Wired guest lan ?

Hello
Has anyone been able to do this with a WLC, configuration guidlines say :"
"Wired guest access ports must be in the same Layer 2 network as the foreign controller."
Anyone know if Cisco is working on making this solution work on L3 aswell ?
Regards,
Gk

Hi gudmundurk,
I'm not sure if they would consider it worth developing as you would have to create a tunnel between the guest vlan's gateway and the subnet that the controller is on to keep your network secure anyway. Unless someone out there knows..........
Regards
Scott

Integration of CISCO PRIME1.3 with WLC 7.5.102.0

HI
We have newly depolyed CISCO PRIME1.3 in our network Earlier we were using WCS withj WLC 7.0.116.0 .BUt we can not upgrade the WLC to higher version because of compatibity matrix with WCS therefore purchased CISCO PRIME1.3.
Now e we want to upgrade our WLC to 7.5.102.0 but as per cisco complatibity matrix with PRIME it is not supported with PRIME1.3.
Can we go for the upgarde when we have PRIEM1.3.PRIEM is installed on VM.
1.3.0.20
7.4.110.0
7.4.100.60
7.4.100.0
7.3.112.0
7.3.101.0
7.2.111.3
7.2.110.0
7.2.103.0
7.0.240.0
7.0.235.3
7.0.235.0
7.0.230.0
7.1.91.0
7.0.220.0
7.0.116.0
7.0.98.218
7.0.98.0
7.4.110.0
7.4.100.0
7.3.101.0
7.2.110.0
7.2.103.0
7.0.240.0
7.0.230.0
7.0.220.0
7.0.201.204
7.0.112.0
7.0.105.0
ISE 1.0
ISE 1.1
3.2.0SE
IOS12.2(50)SE
IOS12.2(50)SG
IOS12.2(33)SXI
If deploying Prime Infrastructure as a virtual appliance on a customer-supplied server, one of the following versions of VMware ESX or ESXi can be used:
•VMware ESX or VMware ESXi Version 4.0
•VMware ESX or VMware ESXi Version 4.1
•VMware ESXi Version 5.0
Note VMware Tools Version 4.1 is preinstalled in the Prime Infrastructure virtual appliance.

Please upgrade your PI to Pi 1.4 if you want to use WLC 7.5
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/prime/infrastructure/1.4/release/notes/cpi_rn_14.html

Anyone seen strange behavior with wired guest access on WLAN Controller?

Cisco Doc ID 99470 spells out how to deploy wired guest access over wireless LAN Controllers.
That said, everything has been up and working for almost a year. Guest wireless uses anchor controller in DMZ - no issues.
Recently configured two wired ports for wired guest networking. The desktops get the correct IP address via DHCP. A wireless client (on the table right next to the wired clients) on the guest wireless gets an IP address as expected as well.
Open a continuous ping to the gateway 172.16.16.1 on all three machines.
The two desktops will ping for a few minutes and then stop for 30 seconds or longer. Wireless client will keep its connection. (you might think it would be the other way around)
I understand there is a 65,535 second inactivity timeout, but I am only sitting here for minutes, not 18 hours when this happens.
On the wired desktops, you have to bring up a browser and log back in just as you do on a wireless client ever few minutes. After debugging the client, I found a "failed to find scb" message in the output.
The other trick here is that the wired clients are miles away from where I can actually get on the CLI of the controller. This makes it difficult to run a debug and bring up a browser since I am not local to the machines when running debugs.
Has anyone ever see this behavior? Has anyone see the "failed to find scb" message?
Thanks in advance!
Succ
essfully plumbed mobile rule (ACL ID 255)
*pemReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:33:15.735: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef 0.0.0.0 tokenID = 5
*pemReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:33:15.735: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef Set bi-dir guest tunn
el for 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:33:15.735: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef 0.0.0.0 Added NPU ent
ry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4
*spamReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:34:54.569: CCKM: Send CCKM cache entry
FP08:(33207772)[cmdSendNodeInfo:3787]failed to find scb 0023.2422.c6eb
*mmListen: Dec 30 11:35:58.539: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef Scheduling deletion of Mobi
le Station: (callerId: 73) in 1 seconds
*mmListen: Dec 30 11:35:59.471: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef Scheduling deletion of Mobi

I found it in the document
B.1 How Logout Works
The WebGate logs a user out when it receives a URL containing "logout." (including the "."), with the exceptions of logout.gif and logout.jpg, for example, logout.html or logout.pl. When the WebGate receives a URL with this string, the value of the ObSSOCookie is set to "logout."
The Access System sets an obSSOCookie for each user or application that accesses a resource protected by a WebGate. The obSSOCookie enables users to access resources that are protected by the Access System that have the same or a lower authentication level. Removing the ObSSOcookie causes the WebGate to log the user out and requires the user to re-authenticate the next time he or she requests a resource that is protected by the Access System.
Well, I havn't got that far in the document:)
Thanks a lot for your help.
-Wei

Wired Guest CWA with ISE

Having a heck of a time getting this to work.
First option is for the device to try and authenticate using Dot1X/EAP-TLS - for domain-connected devices only.
If that fails, they want the option to pop a CWA portal where they can enter either AD creds, or internal Guest user creds.
My challenge is the Policies and where to insert.
I'm using Policy Sets in ISE 1.2
Currently, I have these statements in the Default Policy Set:
Rule Name
Conditions
Permissions
Wired Guest Portal Auth
if Net Access:UseCase EQUALS Guest Flow
Permit Access
Wired Guest Redirect
if Wired_MAB
Wired CWA
What i figured is if they fail the .1X, they'll drop down here to Wired MAB, and that will initiate a redirect and Guest Flow.
Couple problems:
First, it does seem to try; a show auth sess shows the proper redirect URL getting sent to the switchport.
Unfortunately, my browser pop gives me a certificate not recognized error, and if i try to continue anyways, it doesn't do anything. Wireless Guest, which I copied works fine.
Second challenge is that it forces the redirect whether i have the switch (NAD) in Monitor Mode or Low Impact Mode. This is a problem because there are multiple sites, and we're cutting each over to Low Impact progressively.
Does anyone have any insight, or a document laying out in step by step terms implementing this?
thanks in advance.

Hi Andrew! Yes, good job on fixing the portal issue!
And yes, the authorization rules are considered even in an open mode! And you are also correct that you will need to create different rules to account for NADs that are in production and for NADs that are in monitor mode. I have always liked using a separate Policy Set for Monitor Mode and a separate Policy Set for Production Mode. Then I used device location to match against these conditions. For each location I have two sub-groups: One for Monitor and one for Production. That way I can move a NAD from monitor mode to full production by simply changing its group.
Lastly, yes, your CWA rules should be at the bottom of your production authorization rules.
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

OSX 10.10.1 with Cisco ISE guest portal using (CWA) central web authentication issue

We have Cisco Wireless with ISE (Identity Service Engine) to provide guest access with CWA (central web authentication). The idea is to provide guest access with open authentication, so anyone can connect. Then when the guest trying to browse the internet it will be redirected to guest protal for authentication. So only corporate guest with valid password can pass the portal authentication. This is been working fine for windows machine, android, and apple devices with earlier OS version (working on OSX 10.8.5). For clients that's been upgraded to OSX 10.10.1 or IOS 8 they can no longer load the CWA redirection page.
Please let us know if there's any setting under the OSX to solve the issue, or plan from apple to fix the issue on the next OSX/IOS release ?
thanks - ciscosx

Robert,
Manual assignment has been made available in ISE 1.2 release.
M.

WLC 4402 - only present guest with web auth page once every (x) days

Hi all,
I am looking to migrate our guest wireless from a third-party system to the WLC. Currently, we change our guest password (WPA2 PSK) every (x) days. Each time the guest password is changed and connections are made with the new PSK, guests are redirected to a terms and conditions page which they must accept. The MAC address is then cached and the page is not displayed again until we clear the MAC cache and change the PSK.
I can almost replicate this with web auth in passthrough mode on the WLC, but it presents the guest with the terms and conditions page each time they reconnect to the WLAN, whether it be from roaming offsite or turning the wireless radio off then on.
Is there any way to have the WLC replicate our current system, where a MAC is cached and the page is not displayed until some other event takes place (changing the PSK or clearing the cache?)
Thanks!
-P

Wait ... Shaoqin, will the 7.5 code be released for the 4400 series controllers? The current release is 7.0.240.0 - I see releases up to 7.4 on the 5500 series controllers
Thanks
-P

Cisco ISE or NAC Guest with web security (IronPort) integration

All,
We have a scenario where guests will be authenticated against the ISE or NAC Guest server, and customer will place an IronPort to provide web security, however, we can not find referentes whether IronPort can or cannot integrate with Guest Server, so that guests are not requested to be authenticated twice, one by the Guest Server, a one by the proxy. The idea is to keep it transparent for the guests with a single authentication.
Has anyone there implemented such scenario?
Thank you!

I see. So, lets say we disable proxy authentication for the guest segment, can I still provide content filter for the segment, even though there is no proxy authentication? I assume customer will lose the reportinga and tracking granularity, but the scenario will work withou proxy authentication. This may be some sort of "man in the middle" only, but with content filter. Does it make sense?
Thank you!

WIRED GUEST ACCESS WLC 5508

Hi Guys,
I've just set up a wired guest access for my HQ but I'm wondering if it is possible to do the same in a branch office because We do not have another controller in this site, could this be accomplished using the wlc of the hq?
Any ideas please.
Regards
Oscar

If you have L2 communication between HQ & BR, this is possible (then you can extend your wired user vlan to your WLC).
Otherwise you have to have a WLC at your branch as well.
http://mrncciew.com/2013/03/26/wired-guest-access/
HTH
Rasika
**** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Challenge: Spanning Tree Control Between 2 links from Switch DELL M6220 to 2 links towards 2 switches CISCO 3750 connected with an stack (behavior like one switch for redundancy)

Hello,
I have an Spanning tree problem when i conect 2 links from Switch DELL M6220 (there are blades to virtual machines too) to 2 links towards 2 switches CISCO 3750 connected with an stack (behavior like one switch for redundancy, with one IP of management)
In dell virtual machine is Spanning tree rapid stp, and in 3750 is Spanning tree mode pvst, cisco says that this is not important, only is longer time to create the tree.
I dont know but do you like this solutions i want to try on sunday?:
Could Spanning tree needs to work to send one native vlan to negociate the bdpus? switchport trunk native vlan 250
Is it better to put spanning-tree guard root in both 3750 in the ports to mitigate DELL to be root in Spanning Tree?
Is it better to put spanning- tree port-priority in the ports of Swicht Dell?
¿could you help me to control the root? ¿Do you think its better another solution? thanks!
CONFIG WITH PROBLEM
======================
3750: (the 2 ports are of 2 switches 3750s conected with a stack cable, in a show run you can see this)
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/28
description VIRTUAL SNMP2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
logging event trunk-status
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/43
description VIRTUAL SNMP1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
shutdown
DELL M6220: (its only one swith)
interface Gi3/0/19
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
exit
interface Gi4/0/19
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
exit

F.Y.I for catylyst heroes - here is the equivalent config for SG-300 - Vlan1 is required on the allowed list on the catylyst side (3xxx/4xxx/6xxx)
In this example:
VLANS - Voice on 188, data on 57, management on 56.
conf t
hostname XXX-VOICE-SWXX
no passwords complexity enable
username xxxx priv 15 password XXXXX
enable password xxxxxx
ip ssh server
ip telnet server
crypto key generate rsa
macro auto disabled
voice vlan state auto-enabled !(otherwise one switch controls your voice vlan….)
vlan 56,57,188
voice vlan id 188
int vlan 56
ip address 10.230.56.12 255.255.255.0
int vlan1
no ip add dhcp
ip default-gateway 10.230.56.1
interface range GE1 - 2
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode auto
int range fa1 - 24
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 188
switchport trunk native vlan 57
qos advanced
qos advanced ports-trusted
exit
int Po1
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 56,57,188
switchport trunk native vlan 1
do sh interfaces switchport po1
!CATYLYST SIDE
!Must Explicitly allow VLan1, this is not normal for catalysts - or spanning tree will not work ! Even though it’s the native vlan on both sides.
interface Port-channel1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,56,57,189
switchport mode trunk

Cisco wired guest with one wlc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for