CJ8G Settlement Reverse Processing Type

Hi Gurus,
When I reverse a settlement with a given selection variant I noticed that not only automatic settlements were reversed but partial capitalization as well, regardless that when during the reversal the "automatic" processing type was set. Is this normal? Can I set somewhere in the system that reversal will keep the settings in the processing type field?
Thanks in advance
g

Hi,
Please refer note 336557.
regards
Waman

Similar Messages

CJ8G Settlement Reverse Processing Type (CO forum)

Hi Gurus,
The following issue had been posted in the PS section without luck, maybe here can be answered.
When I reverse a settlement with a given selection variant I noticed that not only automatic settlements were reversed but partial capitalization as well, regardless whether during the reversal the "automatic" processing type was set. Is this normal? Can I set somewhere in the system that reversal will keep the settings in the processing type field?
Thanks in advance
g

Hi,
Please refer note 336557.
regards
Waman

CJ88 Settlement Processing Type

Hi,
I would like to know the correct "Processing Type" to specify in Actual Settlement run (CJ88) for settling to Asset Under Construction (AUC) and Final Asset. Please confirm if it is correct to use "By Period" for settling to AUC and use "Full Settlement" to settle to Final Assets.
Thanks!
Vivian

we enter processing type in the intial screen of project settlement which controlls the settlement process.
With processing type By period : only distribution rules with settlement types to PER ( Periodic Settlement ), PRE( preliminary settlement ) & AUC ( Asset under settlement ) are taken in to account.
How ever settlement to AUC will happens at last. So, if with this sequence if you have maintained any settlement type PRE( Preliminary ) , it will consider it first & therefoe settle cost portions that are not to be capitalised.
If I say in the context of your question,
With the first settlement of WBs sys automaticallty generates a distribution rules for the settlement type AUC. If you don't want to settle all the cost of WBS to AUC, you must enter additional distribution rule for the debit to other receivers that are not to be capitalised. Use settlement type PRE ( Preliminary ) to ensure that these distribution rules are taken into account before the settlement to AUC.
Once the Assset under construction Phase is completed, create a completed asset. We does the same in Cj20n. next, define the distribution rules in the WBS element with settlement type FUL for the cost portion to be capitalised and enter the completed asset as receiver.
Not that distribution rule with settlement type FUL is only taken in to account in the project settlement if you ahve used Partial Capitalisation / automatic as the processing type
So, in short
when you want to settle to AUC use the distribution rules with settlement type AUC (generated by sys) & processing type periodic
when you want to settle to FXA you should use the settlement type Full & processing type partail capitalisation / automatic.
However the processing type Full settlement is used for the settlement rules with distribution rules of settlement type PER ( Periodic ) only, in to check weather the balance still exists in the object after the settlement due to debits to previous periods.
So, don't get confued with settlement type FUL (full settlement ) & processing type Full settlement. ( processing type full settlement has nothing to do with AUC )
Regards
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Patoliya on Dec 12, 2008 9:43 AM

Processing Type in Settlement

Dear All,
Is there any idea about Processing Type in Settlement, Can u give some help on it.
Regards

Hi Raj,
The processing type in settlement is relevant for the type of processing you are going to do.
Typically they are Automatic, Partial capitlization, by period and Full settlement.
For Manufacturing orders you normally keep it as Automatic. When you keep "Automatic", system will automatically pick whether the periodic settlement or full settlement depending on the Order Type and the settlement profile settings.
In case of Internal Orders being used as investment orders where the capital expenditure is captured to Internal Orders and then settled to a fixed asset, in such case we need to specifically choose the settlement type whether it is partial capitalization or full.
Hope this gives a good understanding about the settlement type.
Please do let me know if you need futher details in this regard
Best Regards
Surya

Settlement reverse issue

Hi,
we have created one sales contract 141000, with out giving result analysis we have done settlement on the date of Aprial 2010 with the transaction code VA88, now we are going reverse the settlement with the transaction code VA88.
system it is showing below error message.
Reversal not possible; last settlement was in period 004 2010
Message no. KD547
Diagnosis
You can only reverse the last settlement carried out. This was in period 004 2010. This is not the same as period 005 2011 which you have entered.
Procedure
Check whether the settlement for the specified period can still be reversed, and correct your entry if necessary.
Please sujjest some solution.
Regards
Raju

Hi ,
The following can help you :
372630 Information: Reversal for settlement
359814 Info: Cannot reverse settlement reversal
140672 Info: Settle/reverse costs from previous per
To settle unsettled costs from previous years/periods without having
to reverse all periodic settlements, you could use a FUL rule. Please
read the F1 help for the field 'Processing Type' in the settlement
transaction (e.g. KO88). If a PER rule is used together with a FUL rule,
the system settles all costs which are posted in the settlement period
(=period entered in the settlement transaction) with the PER rule,
whereas all unsettled costs in previous periods (<settlement period)
will be settled with the FUL rule. This allows it to settle all
costs which have not been settled periodically before cumulated in the
settlement period. The credit posting is made in the settlement period
or, if entered, in the posting period (this must not be smaller than the
settlement period).
If a FUL rule is not desired and a previous period should be settled
with a PER rule, all settlements down to this previous period must be
reversed one by one.
Best regards,
Filipe Santos

Settlement of Process order aginst the Sale Order

Dear friends
This the scenario with respect to product cost by sale order settlement profile. When I am settling the process order, which is created with reference to Sale order, system throwing an error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type SDI".
When I see the explanation given by system, the following message displayed :
"Diagnosis
In allocation structure Z1 (controlling area RI01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type SDI.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure Z1.""
For this I have defined one Secondary cost element and assigned to Allocation Structure under Settlement cost elements.
Still I am getting the error. What could be the reason?
Please do the needful.

Hi Kiran
In the Allocation Structure Z1, you need to define the Settlement cost element for the receiver category SDI. Have you done that? Cost element should be created with 21 Cost element category.
Dont Select By Cost element.
Regards,
Suraj

Reversing process or Subcontract Challan

Hi,
I want to know how to cancel the subcontrcat challn also in status of challna therte are reverse , cancel and delete what is exact diffrenece in all this i want to cancel my challan and also material docuemnt what is use of reverse process also in status there is also posted what is men by if status is posted as if we close it status is comleted .
regards,
zafar

Hi,
The process is like
SUB-CONTRACTING CONDITION RECORDS - FV11 for service tax and cess
SUB-CONTRACTING CONDITION RECORDS - ME21N
RELEASE STRATERGY FOR PURCHASE ORDER - ME28
TRANSFER POSTING OF CHILD PARTS TO SUB-CONTRACTOR - MB1B 541 Mvt Type
SUBCONTRACTING CHALLAN - J1ILN
GOODS RECIEPT - MIGO
RECONCILING SUBCONTRACTING CHALLAN - J1IFQ
INVOICE VERIFICATION - MIRO
For reversal Status C is for Completed. Go to J1IF11 and give Challan No and inside Try to Delete items.
Also try to Reverse the Subcontracting Challan in J1IF13.
Please go through below link is a little Explanatory in your case,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000a114084/frameset.htm

Processing type in ko88

Hi Expert,
is there any standard setting to configure processing type in t-code KO88. e.g. disable one of options
Thanks
Rgds,

Hello Stephanie,
You can not change the processing type options. They are provided to cater to various requirements.
1. In Automatic all distribution rules for a sender are selected. If a sender only has distribution rules with the PER settlement type, then only the settlement period costs are selected and settled.If a sender has distribution rules with the the PER settlement type (PER rules), and distrubution rules with the FUL settlement type (FUL rules), then the PER rules are used first for the costs in the settlement period. If there are still costs left over, then the FUL rules are used.
A production order with a FUL rule to Material is only settled once it is technically completed, or completely delivered. Until then, however, "work in progress" can be transferred to financial accounting, if the WIP was calculated.
2. In Periodic all distribution rules with the settlement type PRE, PER and AUC are selected. The PER rules are applied first (except for investment measures).The PRE rules are applied first for investment measures, and then the remaining amount is settled with the automatically generated AUC rules to the asset under construction.
3. You use Partial Capitalization processing type to partially capitalize an investment measure that is not technically completed, so that a part of the total cost to complete assets is settled.
4. Full Settlement : use this type of processing if a sender only contains distribution rules with the PER settlement type, and if a balance check is to be made after settlement
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Authorization in CJ88 by Processing type

Hello,
Our customer requires to split authorization roles for settlement processing by Processing type in CJ88. So, one group of users should be able to use only periodical settlement (automatic and by period), and another one only final (partly and final capitalization).
Does anybody know how to do it?
Thanks in advance!
DD

HI
One option is you can havetwo test user ids and test those requirements. Let you basis team starts the trace and find what are all objects it passes throgh during performing settlement run.
Hope that will work and discuss with your basis team.
Regards,
PSR

Reversal Process Model using PUOCBA

Hi Guys,
There is a requirement in our Co. to set up a reversal process model using PUOCBA.
As far as i know, it is a pretty standard process and we need to copy standard process model SAPUSOCV and create our own and use the same in PUOCBA selecting the reversal option.
I am doing my every steps correctly, but some how in table T52OCG the Processing type field is not converted to 'V' which is necessay for reversal and it does not allow me to do reversal.
Kindly brief me on the same , if you have face the same kind of problem or have worked on it.
Regards,
Ketal Parikh.
1-847-330-4127

Hi Jim,
So this is my understanding. You have two different sequence files that are run for two different Test Environments. These two environments uses two different data structures to perform some initialization on two different instruments.
The best way to do so without any modification to the sequential process model is to create Sequence File Globals. So lets say that you have test sequence 1 and test Sequence 2. The two data structures will be DataStruct 1 and DataStruct 2. So open your Test sequence 1 in the sequence editor. From the "View" drop down box on the sequence editor, select "Sequence File Types" and create your DataStruct 1 here. Similarly do that same for Test Sequence 2, create DataStruct2.
Now use the ProcessSetup and ProcessCleanup callback. Again you shouldn't modify your process model. Go to Edit Menu >> Sequence File Callbacks. Select your callbacks and click add. This will automatically add your callbacks to your Test Sequence files. Now you can add the code relevant to your instruments here and you have access to your datastructure as well. The beauty with callbacks is, you can override the ones in your process model by the ones in your sequence files. This is automatically done, when you place the callback in your sequence file. Now we have accomplished what you wanted to do without a single modification to your process model.
I hope this helps
Sijin Karayil
National Instruments

REVERSING PROCESS ORDER

What Does reversing process order mean?Do we need to reverse both the of raw material consumption and semifinished good production
or reverse only semifinished good production and which Tcodes are involved?

Debasish,
There is no specific terminology or process to describe Reversing Process order. The possible reversals are,
Goods Movement -
Goods Issue 262 Mvt Type MB1A transaction or MIGO
Goods Reciept 102 Mvt Type MB31 transaction or MIGO
Confirmation Reversal
CORS - Basically this is cancellation
If the process order was designed for Backflushing and Auto GR, then the reversal of all goods movment also happens when canelling confirmation.
Material Document Cancellation
You can also reverse goods movment by cancelling the material documents using transaction MBST.
Hope I was able to give you an overview as what is possible.
Regards,
Prasobh

[Sale Based Rent] RESRSE- Settlement step Processing of SBR not successful

Hi everyone,
While processing Sale Based Rent Contract by RESRSE,
I got some errors as below ( I'm using Cod Type: Sale Based Rent of System)
Step Posting of Sale Base Rent in Financial Accouting perform on 21.12.2011 at 11:14:4
Message for Receiving Posting
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
Message for General Cashflow Records
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
Message for Object Transfer
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
Message for Transfer of Advance Payment
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
I thought I was missing somethings. Please advise!
Regards,
TienLQ

Hi Li,
It is very difficult to find out what went wrong basing on message number, that to message class RECAPR is common message class and it will be used everywhere in RE process (settlement, periodic postings ......)
if you provide some more details, somebody can help you.
I think all your error message relates to same issue, provide error log details for any single step.
rgds,
Srini

ABOUT REVERSE PROCESS ORDER

CAN U TELL ME WHAT SHOULD BE THE REASON FOR MOVENT IN REVERSE PROCESS ORDER?CAN U GIVE SOME LINKS ON REVERSING PROCESS ORDER

Debasish,
If it is GR reversal then movement type should be 102, if it is components Issue reversal it should be 262.
If the process order is designed for Auto GR & Backflush, then you can cancell the GR & GI along with confirmation using transaction CORS.
If they were seperate then Confirmation cancellation is CORS, GI Cancellation in MB1A and GR Cancellation in MB31 or you can use MIGO for both.
The other alternate is to cancell the material document using transaction MBST. You can see the material documents created for materials movment in the order->Lists->documented goods movment.(COR3).
Regards,
Prasobh

Intercompany STO - Reverse Process

Hi Gurus
What is the process/config steps for the intercompany STO reverse process.
Forward is: NB (PO) --> NLCC (Delivery) --> IV (Billing). No sales order involved.
Please advise the reverse flow and necessary configs involved.
Regards
RG

Hello,
As per standard practice for managing intra compnay or intercompnay stock transfer return, you can use the followig process;
1.Create stock transport Purchase order and also tick mark the retrun indicator in the item overview.
2. Now create delivery(return) with VL10B. You must have already customized delivery type and item category settings in customization
For inter company transfer , use delivery type NCR and item cateory as NCRN
For intracompany transfer , use delivery type NLR and item category as NLRN
3. Goods reciept : Do the goods reciept for inventory management with movement type 101 , where as system will do the goods issue for return order with corresponding movement type 161.
4. Post goods Issue wihch in this case will act as post goods reciept.
Go to VL02N and do the Post Goods Issue
With this the system posts the goods receipt in the background.
For Cross-company-code:
With Two-step procedure movement type is 673
With One-step procedure 675
The goods receipt is automatically posted with movement type 161.
For Intra company code:
With Two-step procedure the movement type is 671
With One step procedure the movement type 677
The goods receipt is automatically posted with movement type 161.
I also suggest you please go through SAP OSS Note 430074 - Advice note plant return / store return which will help you in setting up the Stock transport returns.
BR,
Tushar

Custom Process Types not working in SAP BPC 10.0

Hi Experts,
We have migrated from SAP BPC 7.5 NW to SAP BPC 10.0 NW.
We have three Custom Process Types created in BPC 7.5NW using the super class CL_UJD_SIMPLE_ACTOR as super class.
It has been made Obsolete and Final class in BPC 10.0NW and the Custom Process types are not running as expected.
Can you please suggest if there is any alternative for using the existing custom process types? Or do we have any alternative for creating custom process types?
*Note: We have tried replacing the superclass with CL_UJD_ACTOR instead of CL_UJD_SIMPLE_ACTOR but of no use.
Regards,
Balraj.

Hi Inl,
The statement looks fine, just confirm:
Your CATEGORY dimension is named CATEGORY? Is it really has property COMPARISOIN?
Can you show the screenshot of UJKT run of script?
What is your core BPC SP?
Vadim

CJ8G Settlement Reverse Processing Type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for