CK11N - New Overhead dependence

Hi everybody,
I'm creating a new overhead procedure:
1 - I created a new table by transaction KK05 to add the field "material group" on a dependence to be used on Overhead calculate.
2 - I created the new depedence by transaction KGF4 and generate it.
3 - After I defined percentage overhead rates using this new dependence by "material group" by transaction KZZ3;
4 - I define the costing sheets by transaction KZS2 to use the new overhead rate created;
5 - Finaly I added the new cost elements used on the configuration of the Credits used in KZS2 to Cost components Structure by transaction OKTZ.
I check the configuration many times, and it is correct, but anyway when I run CK11N the transaction don't take into account the new overhead created.
I change my configuration to a standard depedence just to make a test and it worked, but of corse I don't want to use a standard dependence becouse there is no option to do by "material group".
Anybody tried to do the same ? I'm forgoting anything?
I checked the condition created on table T682 and it is not actived, it could be my problem? if yes please let me know how to activeted it.
Any sugestion is wellcome!

Hi
Origin group can not be used as a Dependency
Origin group will be part of the BASE...
Dependency that you would use is Overhead Type/Plant....
For eg: You have 5 material groups... And a diff ovh rate per mat group....
Now, you would create 5 BASES.. Each base will have respective cost ele and Origin group
Then you would create 5 overhead keys with dependancy Overhead type/plant to apply overhead on the 5 BASES
You might also be using Dependency Overhead type/Overhead key, which you can continue to use
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

How can I get a new overhead line replaced?

Hey guys, I suscribed to BT infinity two months ago and I've noticed that everytime it rains my internet is knocked offline. Yesterday my area was battered with rain and wind all day and my internet disconnected 6 times an hour as the light kept going orange showing the annoying router walkthrough page. I've located the source where the wire is exposed and its at the top of the house:
Now I flagged this up to BT two days ago via the online chat page that was sent through twitter but I've not recieived a reply after 48 hours. DLM also has kicked in reducing my speed from 78mbps to 74mbps. I know that from reading these forums, once the speed goes down it stays down forever. I'm now considering turning off the HH5 to stop the speed plummeting even more until this is fixed. Now the question is if I were to replace the whole line, is it possible for BT to restore the speed back to 78mbps? And how do I go about changing the line? Also I believe as it is outside the demarcation point, it's upto BT to fix it and I should not be charged for it?
Cheers guys
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thought I'd give you guys an update, I tweeted BT a few days ago and filled in the online form. They finally rang me back today and it was a fella from Ireland! He saw on the system that I had many intermittent line faults and broadband kept knocking out so I'm having an engineer in first thing Monday morning!
So a word of advice guys, best thing to do is use Twitter and fill in the form and wait for them to get back to you. I don't want to sound racist in any way but it's good to speak to someone who can speak and listen to in English fluently albeit in an Irish accent
I'll let you guys know of any developments and whether my dlm will be resetted once the issue is fixed. It's so sad seeing my speeds drop from 76mb to 54mb over two days of heavy rain
Oh and Btw one question for the pros, my master socket is backwired and I only found this out after my BT infinity installation. To be honest it's not backwired, just that it's crimped through to the extension which was converted into a master rendering my original master defunct. Could I tell the openreach guy to fix that as well or would I be charged for it as it's not a priority to be fixed?

KZZ2 trx - Possibility to do a massive updating of % overhead

Hello,
we have to update a very large quantity of new % overhead in costing sheet for cost estimate using transaction KZZ2. We did this activity manually in the past, but it's very heavy and it can cause errors, so we would like to know if there is the possibility to udpade them in massive way for example udpdating directly a specific table or something else.
Many thanks for support and suggest.
Regards
Giusy Castiglione
Accenture

Using BDC or LSMW with the help of Abaper is more easy than manual update
Srinivas

I updated my iPhone to the new IOS6 and my awesome Google map app was replaced with the sucky, horrible, awful Apple map app. I want my Google navigator map app back!!!!!!

I updated my iPhone to the new IOS6 and my awesome Google map app was replaced with the sucky, horrible, awful Apple map app. I want my Google navigator map app back!!!!!!

I agree. I liked the previous map app. The version 6 app is powered by tomtom, I think. No more street view. I don't care for the new overhead view when dropping a pin. Plus, the current map app doesn't have the local points or data base that the google maps app had. Too bad I can't go back to the old map app.

Itemization does not match cost component split

Hi,
I need your help or could you please shed some light as to how to fix .
A new Overhead was created, in order to add expenses to the pricing of the product. For it a variant of different pricing to which is used currently was created, and so for maintain a historic one of the information.
In addition, in the cost component Structure an adjustment of the configuration was carried out, this was done because the previous the cost component Structure contained 18 elements of costs, which the most of the elements were specified as fixed and variable costs, therefore the system only permitted the addition of 2 more elements (SAP only permits 20 elements of fixed and variable costs), nevertheless was necessary to create a total of 23 elements of costs. For it the previous elements have to be modified and to change some elements as variable costs, specifically the elements corresponding to the accounts of materials. using tcode OKTZ
The addition of 5 more elements of costs, corresponding to overhead elements, where the type 41 costs classes were configured from the plan of surcharge created.
After carrying out the changes and to transport them the client of production, when i execute the T-code ck13n an inconsistency in the previous pricings was generated, because the cost component Structure was modified and the the following one Nº message was showed: CK869 " Mat.XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split, the report of itemization shows different values to the reports of Costed Mutilevel BOM and of Cost Components. Additionally to the error shown by the system, also is observed that to the Cost Components report a cost in the new elements of overhead was added, even when the calculation of previous cost did not contain the determination of overhead.
In order to fix the error, I modified the cost component structure as it was before and the created another cost component structure with the required changes requested by the client specifying that it should start to be current this year. However after that change the error message nºCK869 continue: Mat. XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split. Adding to that error message, the cost of the finished product changes with reference to the calculus of the previous product after modified the configuration and that is because the cost of the semifinished product is not being taken the values of the row material, and it is appearing with cost 0 and the only value that is taking on the matter are the costs of the activities types.

If you want the message to go away then you need to mark and releasse the estimate. However, there is no requirement that you do this. The message you are getting is an informational message only. You can continue without re-costing the item. If you do re-cost the material the new cost estimate will reflect and changes you've made to the components, so there is a good chance you will get a different value with the new estimate. So if that's ok, go ahead and mark and release the new estimate.

Cost center doubt in Itemization of Material Cost Estimate

Hi,
I have one doubt. I creating a material cost estimate of a header material.A new overhead rate ZCDD has been maintained in the costing sheet. An existing crdit key ZC9 has been assigned to the overhead rate ZCDD. The cost element and cost center row has been added in the credit key.
When I run the material cost estimate, the cost element it is coming, but the cost center it is picking is not the one which has been maintained in the credit key.
Can you please clarify my doubt, I am stuck up on this. Please let me know if you need any more information roe clarifications.
Thank you very much.
Prithwiraj.

Hi Rau,
Thanks for the reply.
Can u tell me, is it mandatory to have only one to one Cost Center-Cost element mapping in a Credit Key?
I mean to say is it like that we can assign a cost element of a credit key only to one cost center?
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

Labview 8.0.1 unresponsive when editing

   I've got a good-sized program that I wrote in LV 8.0.1. It has several parallel processes for things like data acquistion, instrument control, and user interface. The user interface VI is optional - the whole program can run without it, but almost all operator interaction is through it. As this is an R&D project, the user interface has grown and grown. It has 11 tabs and hundreds of controls and indicators. I've programmed it so that it only responds to controls on the selected tab and only updates indicators on the selected tab. This works fine when running. It is responsive, but doesn't interfere with the more important tasks.
   Unfortunately, it has gotten unwieldy in editing mode. Most changes I make to the front panel or block diagram invokes seconds or more of delay before I can make another change. Copying controls, adding a wire, whatever. Saves take 10 seconds or more. Any of these changes or saves can not-infrequently lead to a permanent hang or crash.
   I don't recall seeing this in previous versions, though my user interfaces haven't generally gotten this top heavy before. I can't test this in a previous version since I wrote it in 8 from scratch, and I don't want to bother messing with saving backwards. (Besides, it uses 8.0 features that 7.x doesn't support.) I have tried it on several different computers (W2K and WXP) with similar results. So it isn't just some corruption on one computer.
   So my question is: has anyone else noticed this type of effect? Are there any fixes? Any known reasons? This VI is part of a project, and I suspected that the project might include some new overhead. But the editing problem still occurs when the VI is opened outside of the project.
David Thomson Original Code Consulting
www.originalcode.com
National Instruments Alliance Program Member
Certified LabVIEW Architect
There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Jimmie, Ben,
   Thanks for your suggestions. Unfortunately, (fortunately!), most of the problem has disappeared, for no reason I can tell. As of this morning, the delays are an annoying 1 to 2 seconds, compared to an intolerable 10 to 20 seconds yesterday. At this point, it is acting very smilarly to the issues described in your last two links, Jimmie. I'm curious about the first of those two. Could we track down the CAR on that and see how it was resolved. It sounds like the same type of problem, but the thread ends with an NI acknowledgement of a bug but no resolution.
   One other commonality with the threads you mention: I do use a lot of type-defs. (As for the first link, I tested some graphics settings with no apparent difference.)
   Ben, I tried the Save As trick but it didn't do anything. As for my physical memory, it's not so good. I use a Palm clone to keep my schedule in, so I don't miss many appointments, and I don't have to remember phone numbers. But I do tend to forget other things.
Regards,
   Dave
David Thomson Original Code Consulting
www.originalcode.com
National Instruments Alliance Program Member
Certified LabVIEW Architect
There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Activities at the time of Closing Plant.

Can you tell me what activities are generally involved at the time of closing plant and also these data should be transfered to new plant.
I know some of the functions need to do....
fixed assets - ( intra-co move / interco move / write off).
close Open accounts.
finances = cost centres? etc close off periods
Create new cost centers / OHG's
Enter new Overhead rates
Enter activity rates for new cost centers
Closing and Creation of new work centers
Mark materials for deletion in old plants
Move assets record from old to new plant
can any one please elaborate the above functions how we will do.
Please give me brief description.
Cheers,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
I think you should ask this question to the [ERP Financials - Controlling|SAP ERP Financials - Controlling; forum also to get the better replies.
Else you can refer this [link |http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-mm/plant-lock-1395165?cv=expanded]also.
Regards,
Shyamal

Last element in array is overwriting the entire array

Hey all,
Im a java student working on a homework assignment. My issue is:
I have created two classes. One called Dependent and one called employee
inside employee i have an array of dependents. The dependents class has methods called getfirstname()
and getlastname();
bascially im doing this.
static Dependent[] Dependents = new Dependent[2];
Dependents[0] = new Dependent("Ryan", "Karr");
Dependents[1] = new Dependent("John", "Doe");
Dependent[0].getFirstName(); // this returns john
Dependent[1].getFirstName(); // this returns john aswell
what am i doing wrong? If i take the static off dependents i get an error.
im sorry if this is sketchy this is my first term taking java.
my source is below
Thank you!
Ryan
public class Employee
     static Dependant[] dependents;                                                       // Dependents Array
     static int numDependents = 0;                                             // Number of Dependents
     public Employee(int pNumDependents)
          dependents = new Dependant[pNumDependents];                         // Instanciate the dependents array
          String dFirstName;                                                       // Dependents First Name
          String dLastName;                                                       // Dependents Last Name
          Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);                              // New input Scanner
          for(int i = 0; i < dependents.length; i++)
               System.out.println("Dependent #" + (i+1));                    // A little bit of direction for the user
               System.out.println("First Name: ");
               dFirstName = input.nextLine();                                   // Dependents first name from user
               System.out.println("Last Name: ");
               dLastName = input.nextLine();                                   // Dependents last Name from user
               addDependant(dFirstName, dLastName, this);                    // Add dependent call
     public static void addDependant(String pFirstName, String pLastName, Employee employee)
               // Make a new dependent
               dependents[numDependents] = new Dependant(pFirstName, pLastName, employee);
               // Number of the dependent we're on plus one
               numDependents++;
}

That was an example i made up. the error is with the code i posted, It doesnt through an error, it runs. However, when i do run it all the information inside is over written by the last value i entered.
the code above was for addDependent which i call in the segment below, which obtains data from the user
          String dFirstName;                                                       // Dependents First Name
          String dLastName;                                                       // Dependents Last Name
          Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);                              // New input Scanner
          for(int i = 0; i < dependents.length; i++)
               System.out.println("Dependent #" + (i+1));                    // A little bit of direction for the user
               System.out.println("First Name: ");
               dFirstName = input.nextLine();                                   // Dependents first name from user
               System.out.println("Last Name: ");
               dLastName = input.nextLine();                                   // Dependents last Name from user
               addDependant(dFirstName, dLastName, this);                    // Add dependent call
          }

Issue with Scanning Files...

So I have a program that scans a file and does a bunch of stuff with it...I won't go into details too much, as it's not relevant.
Basically, if the file didn't exist, it would return an error message. If the file existed, but the input inside the file wasn't formatted properly, it would return a different error message for each possible issue. I've done all that. But now I have a file that I know is in the workspace, properly formatted, but when i call it in the console, it claims I have an invalid file name. That is, the error that I get if the file doesn't exist. I think it's an issue buried deep into my code, and it's driving me crazy.
import java.util.*;
import java.text.*;
import java.io.*;
public class AssignmentFive_3 {
     private static void Todaysdate() {
          SimpleDateFormat BartDateFormat =
               new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yy");
          Date today = new Date();
          System.out.println(BartDateFormat.format(today));
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          Todaysdate();
          Scanner sc1 = new Scanner(System.in);
          System.out.print("Please Enter a file name to be read: ");
          String filename = sc1.next();
          filename = ""+filename+".txt";
          int filelines=0;
          try {Scanner sc2 = new Scanner(new File (filename));
     while (sc2.hasNextLine()) {filelines++;
     String info = sc2.next();
     String name = sc2.next();
     String lname = sc2.next();
     String wage = sc2.next();
     String dependents = sc2.next();
     String deduct = sc2.next();
     String day1 = sc2.next();
     String day2 = sc2.next();
     String day3 = sc2.next();
     String day4 = sc2.next();
     String day5 = sc2.next();
     Boolean error = false;
     Date date2 = new Date();
     String newDate = new String();
     try {SimpleDateFormat simpleDateFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yy");
     Date date1 = simpleDateFormat.parse(info);
     Calendar calendar = new GregorianCalendar();
     calendar.setTime(date1);
     calendar.add(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH,5);
     date2 = calendar.getTime();
     newDate = simpleDateFormat.format(date2);
     } catch (ParseException F) {System.out.println("Reformat your date and try again."); error = true;}
     int one = name.indexOf('0');
     int two = name.indexOf('1');
     int three = name.indexOf('2');
     int four = name.indexOf('3');
     int five = name.indexOf('4');
     int six = name.indexOf('5');
     int seven = name.indexOf('6');
     int eight = name.indexOf('7');
     int nine = name.indexOf('8');
     int zero = name.indexOf('9');
     int one1 = lname.indexOf('0');
     int two2 = lname.indexOf('1');
     int three3 = lname.indexOf('2');
     int four4 = lname.indexOf('3');
     int five5 = lname.indexOf('4');
     int six6 = lname.indexOf('5');
     int seven7 = lname.indexOf('6');
     int eight8 = lname.indexOf('7');
     int nine9 = lname.indexOf('8');
     int zero0 = lname.indexOf('9');
     if (one > 0 || two > 0 || three > 0 || four > 0 || five > 0 || six > 0 || seven > 0 || eight > 0 || nine > 0 || zero > 0 || one1 > 0 || two2 > 0 || three3 > 0 || four4 > 0 || five5 > 0 || six6 > 0 || seven7 > 0 || eight8 > 0 || nine9 > 0 || zero0 > 0)
     {System.out.println("Aliens might have integers in their name...but we don't employ aliens! Fix your name."); error = true;}
     double hours1 = new Double(day1).intValue();
     double hours2 = new Double(day2).intValue();
     double hours3 = new Double(day3).intValue();
     double hours4 = new Double(day4).intValue();
     double hours5 = new Double(day5).intValue();
     double money = new Double(wage).intValue();
     double depend = new Double(dependents).intValue();
     double deducts = new Double(deduct).intValue();
     if (money < 7) {System.out.println("Don't be ridiculous! We wouldn't dare pay less than minimum wage. Fix your wage."); error = true;}
     if (money > 100) {System.out.println("Who do you think you are? Thor? Short of you being a mythical norse god, we don't pay that much per hour. Fix your wage"); error = true;}
     if (depend < 0) {System.out.println("It's wonderful you're so independent...but I doubt you're THAT independent. Fix your dependents."); error = true;}
     if (deducts < 0) {System.out.println("You really might want to think about your retirement...at least don't take money OUT of it. Fix your pre-tax retirement deduction."); error = true;}
     if (hours1 < 0) {System.out.println("Maybe you're lazy, but give yourself a bit more credit! Fix your hours for day one."); error = true;}
     if (hours2 < 0) {System.out.println("Maybe you're lazy, but give yourself a bit more credit! Fix your hours for day two."); error = true;}
     if (hours3 < 0) {System.out.println("Maybe you're lazy, but give yourself a bit more credit! Fix your hours for day three."); error = true;}
     if (hours4 < 0) {System.out.println("Maybe you're lazy, but give yourself a bit more credit! Fix your hours for day four."); error = true;}
     if (hours5 < 0) {System.out.println("Maybe you're lazy, but give yourself a bit more credit! Fix your hours for day five."); error = true;}
     if (hours1 > 12) {System.out.println("This company won't look kindly on sneaking into the office after-hours. Even if it is to work. Fix your hours for day one."); error = true;}
     if (hours2 > 12) {System.out.println("This company won't look kindly on sneaking into the office after-hours. Even if it is to work. Fix your hours for day two."); error = true;}
     if (hours3 > 12) {System.out.println("This company won't look kindly on sneaking into the office after-hours. Even if it is to work. Fix your hours for day three."); error = true;}
     if (hours4 > 12) {System.out.println("This company won't look kindly on sneaking into the office after-hours. Even if it is to work. Fix your hours for day four."); error = true;}
     if (hours5 > 12) {System.out.println("This company won't look kindly on sneaking into the office after-hours. Even if it is to work. Fix your hours for day five."); error = true;}
     double hours = (hours1 + hours2 + hours3 + hours4 + hours5);
     double pay1 = ((hours) * (money));
     double overhours = (hours-40);
     while (overhours < 0) {overhours = 0;}
     double overpay = (overhours*(money*.5));
     double grosspay = (pay1 + overpay);
     double pay = (grosspay) - (100 + (50*depend));
     double taxincome = (pay - deducts);
     while (taxincome < 0) {taxincome = 0;}
     double taxcharge = (((.18 - (.02*depend))*taxincome));
     while (taxcharge < 0) {taxcharge = 0;}
     double paycheck = (taxincome - taxcharge);
     while (paycheck < 0) {paycheck = 0;}
     DecimalFormat format = new DecimalFormat("0.00");
     String paycheckprint = (format.format(paycheck) + " ");
     int numby = 0;
     if (error = false) {
          while (filelines > numby)
     System.out.println("Pay to the order of " +name+ " " +lname+ ": " +paycheckprint+ "");
     System.out.println("Memo: employee #" + numby + " for the period " +info+ " through " +newDate+ "");
     numby++;
          } catch (Exception E) {System.out.println("Invalid file. Try again.");}
}

morgalr wrote:
flounder wrote:
morgalr wrote:
without thinking.Which is in my experience is the biggest problem with uni students, they just don't think.I think you have to put more into that category than just uni students--beginners and casual users in general, but as far as uni students, I've found grad students are by far worse than any of the undergrads. To get a degree in CS at the uni I went to (ages ago) each student had to do a block of "consulting", basically fielding any and all questions in the computer lab, for an entire semester. Undergrades you cold reason with, but "most" or the grad stufents that came, already knew "No under grad could ever help them." It was humorous to see these guys' project dying on the most simple errors and they couldn't get it through their head what it was. I saw one guy fish through his core dump for 2+ weeks to verify exactly what one of the student consultants told him after looking at his code for 30 seconds: he refused to beleive that was the problem, would not ever consider it to try and then changed labs after he found it was just that simple.Amen to that.
IMHO, there should be two default units in any CS degree- Problem Solving 101 and How To Debug 101. Not only would it solve half the problems on here (and in life) before they come up, it makes you less dependent on any one language.
I'm the first to admit that I have been guilty of, and will probably be guilty of in the future, bad debugging and/or problem solving practices. But I'll learn through experience to approach them better. If I'd been taught those at university, then I'd be a much more powerful programmer than I currently am.

AAAAARRRRGGGHHHH !!!

Hi,
Sudden speed drop !!
Up to 20 July was getting 72-73 Mbps download, 18.80 Mbps upload and a ping of 18-19 ms - my download IP profile was 77 Mbps.
On 23 July I test the speed because I thought pages were loading a little slowly and it came back as 61Mbps download, 18.50 Mbps upload and ping of around 31-33 ms - a BT Wholesale test stated my download IP Profile had dropped to 65 Mbps
Now, I accept that in the grand scheme of things, a download speed of 61Mbps is pretty good (compared to some on here), but I've spent what seems like a year of my life on the phone to India as, in my opinion, something has changed and caused my connection to be impacted??
The chap I was talking to basically said that as far as they were concerned, if it was higher than 44 Mbps, I should be satisfied!!
Two of my friends on Infinity are connected to the same cabinet as I am. One of them is about 100M closer to the cab than me, the other about 20M further away than me. Whilst they are only on Infinity 1, they both get max speed (38-39Mbps) and have a ping of around 15ms.
I had an engineer here at the end of May who diagnosed a line fault as he said the lines were over 30 years old!! He stated I was less than 300M from the cabinet and when he tested my connection at a pole 50M from my house he was getting 76Mbps - from that point, he said there had clearly been some sort of wiring issue in the past as he could see new overhead wiring linking the two poles together, bypassing some the underground wiring.
It's such a shame that all the investment in fibre rollout if crippled by antiquated street wiring!!!
Could it be the recent warm weather that's caused this??
I'm certain it's not what the bloke on the phone said "lots of customers have joined BT in your area and your speed has been lowered to accommodate them" !!! Did they all get connected on 21 July ???

Ray,
Thanks for the info.
What I've got to do now is convince BT that there is a problem "somewhere" !!
I think I understand the DLM system, in so much as the IP profile is progressivly lowered if the system detects disconnections/problems on the line - that's what I experienced in April/May when it gradually went down from 72 -> 67 -> 64 and then settled at 59 Mbps.
After the Engineer vist at the end of May it went back to 72-74 Mbps download and stayed there until 20th July.
This time, it's just suddenly been chopped from an IP profile of 77 to 65, literally overnight. The kids are moaning at me now 'cos the ping has gone up so much that it's getting them killed online !!!!

Over head rates & credit key

what are overhead rates & credit key? please explain

Hi,
The explanation for Overhead rates and Credit key are entailed below:
Overhead Rate:
An overhead rate specifies the conditions under which overhead is applied to an object.
In this IMG activity you define percentage overhead rates, for example, 25% in controlling area 0001. You can also define quantity-based overhead rates ($100 per piece).
Percentage overhead rates are recommended if, for example, you want to calculate quantity-independent overhead on costs for particular cost elements in a cost center. Quantity-based overhead rates , on the other hand, are calculated for each unit of measure of a cost element.
You can combine the two by assigning a 10% overhead rate, for example, to a cost element and an additional rate pf $3 per hour.
Overhead rates are limited in duration and can be adapted to meet your requirements as part of current settings.
You must assign a Dependency to each overhead rate. The content of particular order fields for a cost center, a business process or an order can be moved back as dependencies. The system prescribes which fields you can use. For example: if you enter "plant" as a condition, a defined overhead rate is calculated for each plant.
Using this condition, the system can access the relevant condition fields in the appropriate Condition Tables. All the condition tables delivered in the standard contain the fields "Controlling area", "Overhead type" and at least one field from the cost center master data, business process master data or order master data (see below).
Plan, actual, and commitment overhead can be calculated. The overhead type distinguishes between the three. Business processes do not use commitments.
Standard Settings
The SAP standard system contains overhead rates with the following dependencies:
Controlling area
Company code
Order type
Plant
Order type
Order category
Plan version
Overhead type
Overhead key
To define order-dependent overhead rates, you create an overhead key and enter this key in the order master data.
To define product-dependent overhead rates, create an overhead key and link this key to an overhead group. This group is then entered in the costing view of the material master record.
Activities
To define a percentage overhead rate, proceed as follows:
1. Choose "Create" to create a new overhead rate.
2. Enter a four-character identification code and a description for the new overhead rate and assign a condition to it.
3. Select the row and choose "Detail"
4. Specify the individual overhead rates.
Each record consists of a validity period, a percentage rate and several condition fields, which are taken from the the condition tables.
5. Save your overhead rate.
Credit key:
Cost allocation is part of the process of determining overhead rates. If this leads to an object being debited with actual costs, another object in Cost Accounting must be credited at the same time. This can be either a cost center, order or a business process. This type of posting is recorded under a secondary cost element of cost element category 41 (overhead rates) in the SAP System.
When you define credits, you also specify which credit object is to be credited under which cost element when overhead is to be applied to an object in the actual.
You can also define what percentage of the overhead is to be allocated as fixed costs.
Activities
To define a credit, proceed as follows:
1. Choose New entries to create a new credit.
2. Enter a three-character key and a name for the new credit.
3. Select the row and choose "Detail".
You have the option of entering credit definitions that contain the following:
A validity period
An overhead cost element
The overhead cost element must have cost element category 41.
An origin group
You must specify an origin group if you want to see both the overhead cost element and the origin of the overhead in cost accounting
The percentage of the overhead to be allocated as fixed costs.
"*": The fixed portion of the costs is determined in the same way as the portion of fixed costs for the debit object.
A credit object
You can enter either a cost center or an order, or a business process as a credit object, but not more than one at the same time.
4. Save your entries.
Hope this answers your query.
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

Overheads not calculated in CK11N cost estimation

Hi all,
I have two issues
1. When i am executing CK11N,i am not able to get the overhead calculation in itemization,but its showing some ridiculess firgure in cost component structure.I am using dependency D020.
2 . when i am using dependency D050 the system not calculating overheads.
We have single plant with two process Repetative and Process order.I want to calculate the overhead on the Order type basis but the system is not calculating the overhead.
So i changed the dependency to D050,now its showing the overhead figure in cost component structure but whic is not matching with the overhead rate i have given..
as my go live is 20 of this month .....its bit emergency
Revert
Regards
Pran

Hi all,
Thnx for your reply.
But i have maintained all the entries in the respective area,even though i am geeting the issue.
It was working fine for my previous repetative manufacturing ...i am using the single cost sheet for both repetative and process order.
And one more thing is that i have a Semi finished goods which is the output of REIM order and is included in process order of the finished good.
The system is calculating the overheads for the semi finished good too once again.
Eg,
Raw Material A and B produces Semi finish material C overheads and the utilities are calculated correctly in Repetative manufacturing.
The semi finished material C is used in producing the finished material D ....in which the system is not caculating the utilities.The big problem is that the figure(value) of itemzation and the Cost component structure is showing two different values.
I am not sure and able to know how and why the system calculates and from where it gets these values ...... totally confussed and under pressure (may not be able to to explain properly).
Revert
Pran

Planned overhead is calculating wrongly in CK11N run, it is just more than double

Hi Gurus
1) While running CK11N overhead cost is calculating wrongly on base (material price). In my case I have maintained 1% Overhead on raw material for Duty in cost sheet. In my case no routing, and my FG is getting produced by process order. My Raw material cost is showing Rs. 2,364.45 but my Duty is showing Rs. 48.73, When I run CK11N for Finished goods.
When I Check the costing structure it is showing all the material for costing, if i drill down there it is calculating correctly for Raw materials. Say heavy furnace oil material cost is Rs. 36,140.16 /M.T and overhead is Rs. 361.40 and for all raw material it is calculating correct 1%. But for my finished goods it is just more than 2%.
As per my understanding over head is calculating for RM once @ 1% and later material cost + overhead cost getting calculated by 1% again.
Please see the attachment. I have furnished a statement for this also.
2) Also Please tell me the T-Code for costing run as actual cost. and how can I show a comparison report on planned and actual report for a product costing.
3) My scenario is this is a power generation Co. Not possible to maintain activity cost. What they want to do is. on the last day of a month they will take the trial balance for the plant/ business area and will set the percentage in cost sheet (Actual for current month / planned for next month) for admin, manpower and other costs based on raw material GL values.
So I have created a cost sheet where I have maintained base and assigned those RM GL/ Cost elements and other costs I have maintained in cost sheet based on row No. 10 (base) and assigned secondary cost elements and percentages assigned as per overhead type and plant, in cost component structure I have maintained same cost elements as set earlier in cost sheet.
Please find the file attached
Please suggest me if I M wrong.
Thanks & Regards
Subrata

Hi.
In itemization of CK11N over head is showing correct. But the material cost for RM is already after charging overhead. I have checked the itemization of Process order there for the first material was Rs. 144.56, but in the itemization view of CK11N it is showing Rs.148.90/- That means exactly after adding 3% overhead which I maintained in cost sheet.
Itemization of Ck11N
Itemization of COR2
Please Help
Thanks & Regards
Subrata

New Macbook Air stopped transmitting to overhead projector

Hello,
Up until last week, I was successfully using 2 different overhead projectors with my MacBook Air (purchased around 2008 or 2009). I've just bought a new MacBook Air, and it has stopped projecting. I use the same connector (VGA?). Seems like it worked at first (showing my desktop, powerpoint, etc.), but it wouldn't show Yotube. Later that same day, at a different projector, it wouldn't project anything at all.
Is this a common problem? What can I do?
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

What type of input does the projector use? A lot use VGA, in which case you'd need this: http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB572Z/B/mini-displayport-to-vga-adapter

CK11N - New Overhead dependence

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for