CKF not showing correct results in BEx Analyzer

Dear Friends,
I am getting different results when viewed from BEx Analyzer and Web Analyzer for the same query. BEx Analyzer shows incorrect results. The column that is showing different is a local formula (say Formula3) that is a result of dividing Formula1 by Formula2.
BEx Web calculates Formula3 correctly while BEx analyzer does not.
I am in BI 7.0 SP 10.
Any Clues?
Thanks
Viren

For this calculated column set aggregation level as sum.

Similar Messages

  • VL06I Inbound delivery monitor not showing correct results

    Dears,
    We are creating inbound deliveries on the basis of POs and creating GR via MIGO after eliminating movement type in line item catageory by using SPRO. For monitoring we would like to use VL06I but its not showing correct results.
    Can anyone guid me ?
    Regards,
    FR

    You can list all Inbound Deliveries by selecting "List Inbound Deliveries"  Tab in VL06I
    May be if you can little elaborate the issue

  • Aggregation not showing correct results in 10g

    Hi,
    We have created a calculated column in BMM layer as x=Sum(Amount)/sum(Distinct Members).
    In the report, individually it is showing correct results but when we are calculating "Total By" it is showing wrong total.This is because of while calculating totals it is taking the formula as x=Sum(Amount)/sum(Members).
    Aggregations are kept as default for all the columns in the report .
    Please help me to solve this issue.

    For this calculated column set aggregation level as sum.

  • Log application query not showing correct results

    Hi,
    We are running Dataguard (DG) in our production environment. EBS 11.5.10.2 and DB 10.2.0.4.
    Every morning we run the following query on both primary and standby to confirm that the logs are being transported and applied to the standby:
    select sequence#,applied,to_char(first_time,'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss') first from v$archived_log order by first_time;
    Once the logs are transported and applied, a response of 'Yes' is returned for each log generated. We have noticed within the last week that when we run the query on primary, 'No' is being returned, but on standby, 'Yes' is returned. I have confirmed that standby is reflecting the correct results. I've tried restarting the DG service (alter database recover managed standby....) in an attempt to have primary 'refresh' itself but that didn't work.
    Does anyone have any idea why primary keeps returning 'No' to the query, and how we can get it to reflect to correct results?
    Thanks,
    Lia.

    Hi Werner,
    Thanks for your response. Given what you're saying I find that a little strange since prior to this, the query would return a value of 'YES' on the primary. Actually, to be exact, on the primary, each log would should up twice. One would show 'NO' and the other 'YES'- the second indicating transporting and shipping was successful.
    This is how the results were before:
    SEQUENCE   APP   FIRST
    +154623 NO 04/07/09 08:03:22+
    +154623 YES 04/07/09 08:03:22+
    +154624 NO 04/07/09 08:05:27+
    +154624 YES 04/07/09 08:05:27+
    This is how the results are now:
    SEQUENCE   APP   FIRST
    +154754 NO 04/22/09 07:22:22+
    +154754 NO 04/22/09 07:22:22+
    +154755 NO 04/22/09 07:25:27+
    +154755 NO 04/22/09 07:25:27+
    I'm not doubting that what you're saying is correct, it just adds an element of confusion for me...
    Lia.

  • Inventory Non cumulative values are not showing correct result

    Hi Guys,
    I have created a report on Inventory cube taking material in rows and 0T0TALSTCK and 0VALSTCKVAL in colums and i created a variable on calender day . What ever the date if we give we will get the quantity and value as on that date.
    Here Quantity is showing perfectly and in case of value it is showing wrongly. In this case the interesting thing is if we substract the  (Reciet value - Issue ) value then i am getting the correct value.
    Some times Even quantity is zero the noncumulative keyfigure (0VALSTCKVAL)is not showing zero it is showing some value but if i do (Reciet value - Issue ) it will show correctly.
    Please help on this issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    K.Srinivas

    Hi,
    when the quantity is correct, then you have a problem with the values. You have loaded the infocube correcly.
    check your keyfigures and the transformation with the BI content.
    => for example: do you have the coding in the BF transformation?
    * see OSS note 571669
        LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE ASSIGNING <SOURCE_FIELDS>.
          IF <SOURCE_FIELDS>-stockcat EQ 'V' OR
             <SOURCE_FIELDS>-stocktype EQ 'V'.
            DELETE SOURCE_PACKAGE.
          ENDIF.
        ENDLOOP.
    => you have used the datasource 2LIS_03_UM. There are no quantities. Is there your problem.
    Sven

  • Report not showing correct results

    I am new to SSRS.  Using SQL 2008, Visual Studio 2010 shell.
    I have a stored procedure that when I execute it through SSMS, it returns the correct results.  However, when my report runs through SSRS (using the same stored procedure).  I get inconsistent results.
    I've been able to narrow it down to a specific parameter in my report where I pass in Id's.  This particular parameter gets its values from a query and is setup to use multiple values.  I have focused on two ID's which together are giving
    me problems. 
    The IDs are !'" and
    !!T.
    When I ONLY select !'" the report returns the correct results.
    When I ONLY select !!T the report return the correct results.
    When I select !'" and !!T the report only return the results for !!T.
    I have no clue why SSRS doesn't like this.  Any help would be appreciated.
    jhoop

    I created the specific function referenced in your link and it didn't help.
    Function
    CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[c__SplitValues]
    -- Add the parameters for the function here
    @List nvarchar(2000)
    ,@SplitOn nvarchar(2000)
    RETURNS
    @RtnValue TABLE
    -- Add the column definitions for the TABLE variable here
    Id int identity(1,1)
    ,Value nvarchar(100)
    AS
    BEGIN
    -- Fill the table variable with the rows for your result set
    While(CHARINDEX(@SplitOn, @List) > 0)
    BEGIN
    INSERT INTO @RtnValue (value)
    SELECT
    VALUE = LTRIM(RTRIM(SUBSTRING(@List, 1, CHARINDEX(@SplitOn, @List) - 1)))
    SET @List = SUBSTRING(@List, CHARINDEX(@SplitOn, @List) + LEN(@SplitOn), LEN(@List))
    END
    INSERT INTO @RtnValue (Value)
    SELECT Value = LTRIM(RTRIM(@List))
    RETURN
    END
    The line in my SQL statement where I use this function
    AND TableName.UserId IN (SELECT Value FROM dbo.c__SplitValues(@UserId,','))
    jhoop

  • Explain Plan not showing correct results.

    Hi Gurus,
    Please help me to understand below issue.
    Whenever I am doing explain plan on any of the sql statements it says as explained but when retriving the explain plan output it shows same results again and again.
    DB - 11gR2 Stand alone
    ASM - Configured.
    OS - RHEL 6.2.
    SQL> select count(*) from t2114;
    COUNT(*)
    639292
    SQL> explain plan for select count(*) from t2114;
    Explained.
    SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/utlxpls.sql
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 1497650422
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
    | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2210 | 6634 | 524K| 2947 (17)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | T2210_T | 6842 | | 108 (22)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    3 - access("T2210"."C490008000"=:SYS_B_0 AND "T2210"."C490009100"=:SYS_B_2
    AND "T2210"."C301363300"=TO_NUMBER(:SYS_B_1))
    16 rows selected.
    SQL> explain plan for
    2 SELECT T2114.C1 FROM T2114 WHERE ((T2114.C1000000001 = :"SYS_B_0") AND (T2114.C536871442 = :"SYS_B_1") AND (T2114.C536871477 = :"SYS_B_2") AND ((:"SYS_B_3" - T2114.C3) >= :"SYS_B_4") AND ((:"SYS_B_5" - T2114.C3) <= :"SYS_B_6") AND (T2114.C1000000217 LIKE :"SYS_B_7") AND (T2114.C536871478 < :"SYS_B_8")) ORDER BY C1000000161 DESC, :"SYS_B_9" ASC;
    Explained.
    SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 1497650422
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
    | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2210 | 6634 | 524K| 2947 (17)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | T2210_T | 6842 | | 108 (22)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    3 - access("T2210"."C490008000"=:SYS_B_0 AND "T2210"."C490009100"=:SYS_B_2
    AND "T2210"."C301363300"=TO_NUMBER(:SYS_B_1))
    16 rows selected.

    Hi Dom,
    Thanks for your immediate response.
    I am getting two values for PLAN_TABLE. Please let me know if we need to drop any of them??
    SQL> SELECT *
    FROM all_objects
    WHERE object_name = 'PLAN_TABLE'; 2 3
    OWNER OBJECT_NAME SUBOBJECT_NAME OBJECT_ID DATA_OBJECT_ID OBJECT_TYPE CREATED LAST_DDL_TIME TIMESTAMP STATUS T G S NAMESPACE EDITION_NAME
    PUBLIC PLAN_TABLE 5127 SYNONYM 17-SEP-11 17-SEP-11 2011-09-17:09:47:47 VALID N N N 1
    ARADMIN PLAN_TABLE 219426 219426 TABLE 07-APR-13 07-APR-13 2013-04-07:23:01:12 VALID N N N 1

  • Search on Keyword not showing correct results

    I tagged all 5k of my images keywords. Basically people's names of who is in the image.
    I then ran a search by person's name, but a lot of the results do not contain the keyword I searched for.
    In the results I checked the metadata tab under Keywords: and my search term is not listed.
    Am I missing something?
    thanks

    Yes, I added the keywords using 'Batch Change....'
    The Keyword HUD shows all my keywords listed right there at the root. ie. My keywords are not under any other keywords. ie. iPhoto/Raw or Personal/Backyard
    Ta

  • Set in Excel using ORDER MDX statement not showing correct results on PowerPivot model

    I have defined a set in Excel 2013 with this syntax: 
    order(Topcount([Company].[Company].[Company].members,
    10,
    [Measures].[Sum of TotalValue]),[Measures].[Sum of TotalValue]
    ,DESC)
    The order statements is not properly Applied. Order by name is still active. Would appreciate your help, if have I done something wrong or is this a bug?

    Ok in the meantime I have solved this myself. In the field settings is an option for "Automatically order and remove duplicates..." which is turned on by default and overrules specific order statements in the set. I am not quite sure why but as long as
    you know about it, this can be addressed by turning off.

  • ADF Query not showing correct search results.

    Hi,
    I am using normal ADF af:query to search data using a VO Criteria.
    We have modified the getter of searched column in VORowImpl java class to return values based on NLSID search from cache.
    Logic in getter:
    If for a column_name nlsid is present then show data as the value of nlsid.
    Suppose Initially:
    column_name = "Column1"
    column_name_nlsid="Column1_nlsid"
    column_name_nlsid_value="Column1_nlsid_value"
    The table will show:
    column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value"
    if we search "Column1" as column_name, The Search will also show:
    column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value"
    in results
    But,
    If we modify the nlsid value as:
    column_name_nlsid_value="Column1_nlsid_value_MODIFIED"
    Then
    The table will show:
    column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value_MODIFIED"
    if we search "MODIFIED" in column_name, The Search will NOT show any results
    So, it seems to me that the af:query search always searches upon the values derived from InternalAttribute values.
    What can i do to over-ride such behaviour , so that the search also takes the data from modified getters.

    Try posting in Jdeveloper Forum JDeveloper and ADF which has more audience

  • Query not showing detailed result when run through query Designer or Portal

    Hi,
    There is one query which not showing detailed result while running through Query Designer or run in Portal.
    But strange thing is that it is showing the detailed result when i run it through BeX Analyzer.
    While all the other queries don't have this problem in system. All showing the correct detailed result.
    If anyone have some idea on this issue plz let me know.
    Regards,
    Javed
    Edited by: Javed Akhtar on Jul 7, 2009 3:59 PM

    Hi,
    We can do this setting in WAD. Please check the web template and try to remove that setting. When you have hierarchy then we can display only till certain level in portal, this setting is done in web template APIs, but in bex analyzer you can see all the detailed information.
    Edited
    Go through this thread for some more detailed information
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/44/7b5f0a95ce12d0e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    rik

  • Why this query does not show the result?

    Why the query with the schema prefixed does not show the result and the query without schema display the correct results?
    SQL> select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR'.'JOBS';
    select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR'.'JOBS'
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
    SQL> select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR.JOBS';
    no rows selected
    SQL> select data_object_id, OWNER, object_type from dba_objects where object_name='JOBS';
    DATA_OBJECT_ID     OWNER                          OBJECT_TYPE
    69662              HR                                 TABLE
                       OE                                 SYNONYM
    SQL> SELECT USER FROM DUAL;
    USER
    SYS

    Hi,
    the column object_name refers to a object_name which is 'JOBS', the column owner refers to the owner 'HR', the value isn't stored together, so you have to select the two columns. It is the same behaviour as every other table/view. Have a look at the values in the view DBA_OBJECTS.
    Herald ten Dam
    Superconsult.nl

  • Not showing any results V_V2 resheduling sales and stock transfer documents

    My client using   IS Retail .  First i create sales order i want resheduling perticular order through V_V2  i enter article and site ,process sales documents,process stock transfer order,unconfirm quantity and leave simulation   but it does not showing any results...previous showing from 2008 to 2010 sales orders only....
    Please give answer i am waiting your reply...
    Edited by: amitp2121 on Mar 3, 2011 11:57 AM

    Hi Hweiling,
    In my opinion V_V1 used to create confirmed backorder (line item where confirm quantity in first schedule line is 0 and there is no second schedule line) .
    V_V2 is used when you want to alocate your stock based of priority or some criteria.
    For example you have order 1 that created on 07.2007 confirmed but you hasn't delivered yet,  then you have order 2 that created on 08.2007 it's not confirmed, and you have the other order 3 that create on 01.2008 and it's confirmed ready to deliver 03.01.2008. You can use V_V2 to alocate the stock to first order, 2nd order and third order. So you can deliver the first order first, 2nd order and then the 3rd order will be in backorder.
    If you run V_V1, it's only update the stock for second item (if stock is enough).
    If you think why it's not update the order that you want  when you run V_V2, please check the criteria and the stock.
    Guys please correct me if I am wrong.
    tsalasi

  • Enterprise Manager does not give correct results

    I am using version 9.0.2.0.1 core edition(oc4j & web-cache).
    My application consists of business components, java beans and jsp. It is running fine.
    Oracle enterprise manager is not giving correct results of memory/cpu usage by oc4j_home and bc4j.
    Some times it does not gives result, when i refresh it twice or thrice it shows results.
    But results are not correct. On each refresh it gives different results.
    Then it is very hard to find which resuslt is correct.
    waiting for response,
    Tahir.

    i have been using 9iAS versions 102*, 90200, 90201, and now using 903.
    As stated above, some times the results for oc4j_home is displayed.
    But the memory/cpu usage for bc4j is never shown.
    Also, its radio-button is always disabled. while its status is "running".
    On BC4J page, it also shows results of application modules created. But these results are usually wrong.
    How bc4j will be enabled, and how its memory results can be get ???
    Tahir.

  • Disk Utility does not show any result....

    Dear Apple Community,
    on my mid 2012 Mac Book Air the disk utility test does not show any result. The test just stops at some point and can be restarted again, but does not show weather the SSD is damaged or not.
    Does anyone know what this means?
    Thanks a lot for your advice!

    I think this happens to everyone (who uses "Live Verification") in Mavericks.   Occasionally the output from the test shows correctly, but usually not.  I guess this will get fixed someday. 
    Apple - Mac OS X - Feedback
    For now, probably you will get best results from using command-r at startup to get into "recovery mode", then run disk utility from there.
    charlie

Maybe you are looking for