Clearing/ Matching

Hello SAP Gurus',
Need some clarification here.  I am familiar with clearing rules:  In this activity, you enter the criteria for grouping the open items of an account for automatic clearing. The program clears open items of a group if the balance in local and foreign currency is zero. 
However, what if I want matching documents say invoices and credit memo's but they don't net to zero?  What is this called?  Matching?  I want to create rules to associate items by fields like in clearing rules but will associate the credits and the debits.  I do not want netting leaving one line item with a balance but I would like to see for example a partial payment and then a credit memo comes in later and I would like to see the credit memo applied to that partial payment.
Many thanks!
POINTS AWARDED

Thank you Nimit but what if the amounts do not clear?  Is there a way around it if the reference if not on the offsetting document?
The situation I am thinking about is payment A comes in and is a partial payment against invoice A.  Payment A remains open with the invoice open as well linked to the payment.  Then later, a credit memo comes in for the difference.  I want it to clear automatically.
Another scenario, I receive an advance payment and it finds a noted item on account.  What happens to the noted item when the payment matches?  The noted item is not an accounting document.  Then, an invoice via the interface comes in later, I want the payment to clear that invoice however we the user or the customer does not know what the invoice number would be because it isn't created yet.  I was going to do it by matching the information in the assignment field on the payment which would match a field in the invoice?  Good idea or is there a better one.
Many thanks!
POINTS AWARDED

Similar Messages

  • Problem clearing GR/IR when PO in currency different to Company currency

    Hi Experts
    I have an issue where I have a PO in say USD where group currency for company is Aus Dollar (AUD)
    At Month end, for whatever reason there is a GR/IR balance and we maintain it with MR11 but MR11 balances the difference in group currency (AUD) where all other postings for the PO are in USD.
    When we run F.13 or F13E the account never clears as it only clears matching transactions of same currency. We seem to never be able to clear the posting created by MR11 (without introducing a large tolerance in F.13 perhaps?)
    Any ideas on a way forward?
    thanks
    AC

    Hi AC,
    Eventhough the P.O is in foreign currency, when you select the Only balances in local currency option, system stores the values only in company code currency. So while clearing you'll not face any issue.
    If not maintain this indicator, then system stores the values in local currency and that foreign currency also, then while clearing you'll face the problem.
    Only balances in local currency setting should activate to GR/IR clearing account
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Clearing of foreign currency documents in different posting date

    Hi guys:
    I have encountered an issue on the foreign exchange clearing.
    Example given as below Accruals was made on 31 Aug 2008 (Cr Balance), when the invoice is received on 25 Sept 2008, this transaction will be reversed (Dr Balance). And we need to trigger the clearing/matching process. The document currency of the accruals was SGD, but the invoice comes in GBP. Hence, by right, when the invoice is received on 25 Sept 2008, the system should pick the foreign currency rate on this date - WHICH IS 25 Sept 2008.However, the current practice is it depends on which date we do the matching/clearing. Say, if we clear on 20 Sept 2008, the system will pick the 20 Sept 2008 date currency rate, which gives a realised gain/loss (SGD: 716.80 or USD 500.28).
    How to pick up the right currency rate we needed?
    Forrest

    Any idea on this, i can posting and clearing in t-code F-04, so i can change transaction date related to foreign currency exchange rate, but user insist on using F-03, which i can not find transaction date.
    Any useful suggestions, points will be awarded
    Forrest

  • GR/IR clearing question

    Hi everyone,
    can we just use MR11 manually clear out GR/IR without any financial or PO impact? Please advise.

    If you want to clear matched items out of the GR/IR account, transaction f.13. This has no financial impact. Only items that net to zero will clear (GR=IR).
    The advantage of doing this is that the number of items in the account will become much more manageable. Auditors will appreciate this. You will also easily identify old items that need to be addressed.
    Normally, MR11 will cause a financial impact if there are quantity differences.

  • ITunes Match - Completing Library

    Is there any way to complete the library by eliminating low bit rate tracks and uploads that should have been matches?
    Having resolved ineligible tracks (https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3623151) and inconsistent results (https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3629795) there are two categories of tracks that would be great to resolve, notably:
    (1)  Low bit rates tracks:  These are listed in a smart play list showing all songs with a bit rate less than 256.  Many of the tracks listed can easily be found in the iTunes Store, hence they should 'match' allowing a download at 256 - how can this be achieved?
    Example:
    (2)  Uploaded tracks: These are listed in a smart play list showing songs with an iCloud Status of uploaded.  The majority of these tracks are also readily found in the iTunes Store, several being exact matches for entire albums but for some reason iTunes Match did not identify the match - how can this be resolved?
    Example:
    With these as the last two areas to resolve, iTunes Match will have successfully converted my full library.  Any suggestions very much appreciated?

    Worth looking again at the current description of service, it reads:
    "Here’s how it works: iTunes determines which songs in your collection are available in the iTunes Store. Any music with a match is automatically added to iCloud for you to listen to anytime, on any device. Since there are more than 20 million songs in the iTunes Store, chances are your music is already in iCloud. And for the few songs that aren’t, iTunes has to upload only what it can’t match. Which is much faster than starting from scratch. Once your music is in iCloud, you can stream and store it to any of your devices. Even better, all the music iTunes matches plays back from iCloud at 256-Kbps AAC DRM-free quality — even if your original copy was of lower quality."
    Given this many of the requests for support are naturally focused on how to complete a reasonable matching exercise.  Currently approximately 8% of my library is not successfully matched, hence the number of files 'uploaded'.
    If the service simply said 'whilst matching can never be wholly accurate we anticipate that the majority of your library should be matched provided that the songs are held in the iTunes Store' many folk would simply accept the partial matching as a feature of the service.
    For as long as this is not made clear it is a source of frustration for many that apparently clear matches are not succeeding.  A further example from my only library is provided below:
    Example:
    Here in the first album by Phil Collins we can see all tracks are successfully matched.  In the second album many are successfully matched but 4 of 15 are uploaded.  Looking at the iTunes Store Phil Collins Serious Hits... Live! is shown as a current album.
    iTunes Store entry:
    The suggestion, flagged by Keith, that Apple might offer a 'force upload option' - or mine that Apple might offer a 'discretionary match option' would prove very helpful in resolving these apparent anomalies.
    Having made these points it has to be said that iTunes Match overall does represent a superb service, it is simply let down by the current description which over promises.

  • Migration of Open GR/IR Balance

    Hi,
    We are implementing SAP & we have to migrate open GR/IR balance from legacy system to SAP.
    In legacy system there is no GR/IR account however there is a liability account against which Inventory is booked.
    Let's say we have migrated the balance through GL Balance. If we receive invoice from the vendor for the same value then there is no problem however if the invoice value differs from the liability created then how to handle the same?
    Regards,
    D

    Hi D,
    The usual way is, to reconcile the old GR/IR balance in the old way as much as possible. It means, that the balance is posted to a separate account (not the GR/IR from MM) by open items, which will be understandable for the users (usually through a meaningful Assignment).
    Incoming vendor invoices for these cases may be booked as FI invoices against this account with the same "label" (Assignment etc.) and it is reconciled the same way as any other open-item account (e.g., subtotal items by assignment, automatically clear matching ones and investigate others). Or, perhaps a better way is, to keep running the legacy application for invoice verification for all the old cases (where goods receipt occurred in legacy). Posted invoices should be interfaced to SAP, to the open item account mentioned above. This should be done if the migrated volume is high and you want to keep the invoice verification automated even for the old cases.
    So, in general, the usual approach is to open a separate open item account, make an initial migration of the balance (split by meaningful open items) and then make sure that incoming invoices are labeled in the same way, whether manually or automatically. Users should keep an eye on it and follow up on the items (clearing or investigating). After a few months, there should hopefully be nothing left (although reality is often different) and the account should be blocked against posting. But having open items (by purchase etc., similar to SAP purchase orders and items) is the key to reconciling it.
    I have not yet seen re-creating old purchase orders with goods receipts in SAP, although this is also an option (you just need to offset the migrated goods receipts against a negative movement for initial stock upload to keep everything in balance, but it should work as well - perhaps even better than the above. But it is more complicated for data migration and therefore not as common.)
    Hope it helps - good luck!

  • Old GR/IR balances

    Hi experts,
    If i run MB5S, i found few documents lying in the system with GR/IR balances. If i want to clear these documents what are the different options available.?
    1) If I want to settle to vendor, (for the GRs done for the POs few years back), is it thru MIRO as usual or thru FI directly thru JV postings?
    2) And if i does not want to settle to vendor, but just like to clear GR/IR account, then how?
    Also can some one clarify when we use MR11 and when we use F.13?
    Regards,
    Sattuj

    Use F.13 when things equal - e.g. goods received equals invoice received.  It should clear matching amounts automatically.
    Use MR11 when things are not equal - for example, if invoice amount is not fully posted and you are not expecting another invoice.
    Thanks,
    Tammy

  • ATT email in updated form does not open on Firefox - how can I return to classic or make the new version compatible with Firefox?

    Since I updated to the latest version of ATT email from the classic email version, I can't get Firefox to open the mail. And I can't find a link to go back to classic. I need to know if there is a change that I need to make in my Firefox settings to make it compatible or how to return to classic.

    The change between Firefox 3.6.* and Firefox 4 is how location bar search works. In Firefox 3.6 it uses Google "Browse by name" search. With the browse by name search, it performs a Google search and if there is a clear match it will take you to the site, otherwise it shows the Google search result. With Firefox 4 it just performs a Google search if you type something which is not recognised as a URL.
    To get the Firefox 3.6 behaviour on Firefox 4 you need to change a hidden preference.
    # Type '''about:config''' into the location bar and press enter
    # Accept the warning message that appears, you will be taken to a list of preferences
    # Locate the preference '''keyword.URL''', double-click on it and change its value to the link shown below
    [http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q= http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=]
    If you prefer, you can also do this by installing the Browse by Name extension - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/browse-by-name

  • SCOM 2007 R2 : Logical Disk Free Space : Did not Alert

    Hello reader ,
                   I know this might be a repeated hearing for you. I have been sitting wit this issue for many hours now. I would like to understand where or what am I missing.
    We have the default 'Logical Disk Space' Monitoring enabled for ALL servers in our environment. In one SQL server, non-system drive(E:) went beyond the warning(2000MB and 10%) and Critical (1000MB and 5%) Threshold.The total space allotted for the Drive
    E: was 79GB. Now the total space left today morning was 698MB. But no alert was triggered.
    I checked the following
    If the  health service watcher was available. - Yes it was.
    If the Space really dropped to 698 - Yes it did. I verified from Performance Report.
    I checked if there are any overrides - Nothing specific found.
    In most of the blogs they said me to check if both criteria was successful - As shown above it is clearly matches.
    Any idea why this alert was not fired ?  
    S.Arun Prasath HP ARDE TEAM

    Thank you Agarwal ! To Answer your Question.
    1) verify the monitor settings again.
    => I did this N number of times.
    2) ensure there are no overrides
    =>  I did this too.
    3) ensure that monitor properties are set for the correct Windows OS (same as that of the server).
    =>What Do you mean here ?. I did not change any settings , it was there by default. No change was done at all.
    4) also confirm that you do not have any other overrides on the two aggregate rollup monitors for "logical disk free space". These aggregate rollup monitors are just below the unit monitor in SCOM console.
    =>Those Aggregate Rollup monitors are disabled. As we already have this unit monitor Enabled. There is no link to Aggregate monitor.
    If all these settings are true, then can you try this. calculate the exact value in both % and MBytes according to your server, put the same values in your monitor through an override and repro the low disk space condition,. you should get an alert.
    => Not so easy to do this in prod. So will keep you posted when this is tested. Looks like this is the only way we can confirm if the alerts are sent.
    S.Arun Prasath HP ARDE TEAM

  • Does firefox 4 have the 'feeling lucky' google search feature when you type phrases into the URL bar? ATM it goes to google where i then have to click on website.

    if i type simply phrases in to the URL bar (i,e bbc) it use to take me directly to www.bbc.co.uk. but now in firefox 4, it seems to go to google.co.uk instead displaying all the searched items. I then have to click on the link i want.
    Is there any way of enabling this?

    The change between Firefox 3.6.* and Firefox 4 is how location bar search works. In Firefox 3.6 it uses Google "Browse by name" search. With the browse by name search, it performs a Google search and if there is a clear match it will take you to the site, otherwise it shows the Google search result. With Firefox 4 it just performs a Google search if you type something which is not recognised as a URL.
    To get the Firefox 3.6 behaviour on Firefox 4 you need to change a hidden preference.
    # Type '''about:config''' into the location bar and press enter
    # Accept the warning message that appears, you will be taken to a list of preferences
    # Locate the preference '''keyword.URL''', double-click on it and change its value to the link shown below
    [http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q= http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=]
    If you prefer, you can also do this by installing the Browse by Name extension - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/browse-by-name

  • In the previous version of FF I could type a term in the address bar and it would auto open that website, now it just performs a google search. Is that a setting I can adjust or is it not available anymore?

    In the previous version of FF I could type a term in the address bar and it would auto open that website, now it just performs a google search. Is that a setting I can adjust or is it not available anymore?

    The change between Firefox 3.6.* and Firefox 4 is how location bar search works. In Firefox 3.6 it uses Google "Browse by name" search. With the browse by name search, it performs a Google search and if there is a clear match it will take you to the site, otherwise it shows the Google search result. With Firefox 4 it just performs a Google search if you type something which is not recognised as a URL.
    To get the Firefox 3.6 behaviour on Firefox 4 you need to change a hidden preference.
    # Type '''about:config''' into the location bar and press enter
    # Accept the warning message that appears, you will be taken to a list of preferences
    # Locate the preference '''keyword.URL''', double-click on it and change its value to the link shown below
    [http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q= http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=]
    If you prefer, you can also do this by installing the Browse by Name extension - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/browse-by-name

  • .process is not defined in the descriptor

    I am currently working on a system that is base ES2.
    I encounter this error in Workbench when deploying a copied application.
    I also get the error when trying to import archives on the server.
    It usually points to a SubProcess.
    Can anyone tell me if this error is fixed as SP1, or SP2?
    - or - is there any other way around this issue?
    I have looked at the release notes, but do not see a clear match on this error.
    Thanks!
    Mark

    Just wanted to follow up on the solution to my issue.
    It appears the issue centers around circular far dependencies.  In general, it seems LiveCycle chokes when two applications each reference one another.  Note that I'm not talkinng about true circular referencing here wherein one process within application A references a process in application B while that same process refers back to the original process in application A.  In fact, although I haven't tested recently, I believe LiveCycle may actually catch this kind of issue.  The circular far dependencies I'm talking about is simply where a process in application A (call it a1) references a process in application B (call it b1) while a process in application B (call it b2) references a process in applicatoin A (call it a2).  Apparently this kind of circular referencing causes the deployment of said applications to choke.
    The fix was tedious as I had to manually delete all of the far dependencies from both application, deploy those two applications to get them into the runtime, and then implement those dependencies again.
    Going forward it seems like a best practice to only ever have 1 direction for dependencies for any application.

  • In previous version, when typing the keyword "gmail" or "ebay" or "amazon" firefox went directly to the webpage, but in version 4 it stops at google. how do I get it to be like the old one?

    it was so convenient before, and how I got most people to convert to Firefox - just type in the keyword, like "ebay" or "hotmail" and firefox found the webpage for you.
    you say firefox 4 is faster, but now I get redirected to google first, which in version 3 only happened if Firefox wasn't sure of the right homepage.
    how do I get it to be like the old one? if not, I think I'm going back to version 3. which was a lot faster because of this.

    The change between Firefox 3.6.* and Firefox 4 is how location bar search works. In Firefox 3.6 it uses Google "Browse by name" search. With the browse by name search, it performs a Google search and if there is a clear match it will take you to the site, otherwise it shows the Google search result. With Firefox 4 it just performs a Google search if you type something which is not recognised as a URL.
    To get the Firefox 3.6 behaviour on Firefox 4 you need to change a hidden preference.
    # Type '''about:config''' into the location bar and press enter
    # Accept the warning message that appears, you will be taken to a list of preferences
    # Locate the preference '''keyword.URL''', double-click on it and change its value to the link shown below
    [http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q= http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=]

  • Where can I download firefox 3.6,firefox 4 is terrible ? I used to be able to put a key word in the address bar and go straight to the site now I get a stupid google search. I really hate firefox 4 if I cant go back i will use another browser .

    Its all the little things I don't like about firefox 4 mainly the layout and the search.I thought my browser would get an upgrade, this is complete downgrade ,I never went with firefox for speed .I went with firefox because i hate toolbars and I loved the fact I could put tpb only in the address bar and go straight to the pirate bay or ww.bbc.co .uk by typing bbc

    The change between Firefox 3.6.* and Firefox 4 is how location bar search works. In Firefox 3.6 it uses Google "Browse by name" search. With the browse by name search, it performs a Google search and if there is a clear match it will take you to the site, otherwise it shows the Google search result. With Firefox 4 it just performs a Google search if you type something which is not recognised as a URL.
    To get the Firefox 3.6 behaviour on Firefox 4 you need to change a hidden preference.
    # Type '''about:config''' into the location bar and press enter
    # Accept the warning message that appears, you will be taken to a list of preferences
    # Locate the preference '''keyword.URL''', double-click on it and change its value to the link shown below
    [http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q= http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=]
    If you prefer, you can also do this by installing the Browse by Name extension - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/browse-by-name
    Firefox is highly customizable and you may be able to customize it to meet your needs.
    If you do not like the new UI, you can make Firefox 4 look and behave more like Firefox 3.6, for details see http://www.computertechtips.net/64/make-firefox-4-look-like-ff-3-6

  • Talbes For Vendor Reconciliation Report

    Hi all,
    Could any of one please tell me. What is Vendor Reconciliation and what are tables used in it. If Any one of you can explain When we will go for Vendor Reconciliation Report. I will be help full for me.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Vardhan

    Reconciliation is a process of clearing/matching your Dr/Cr entries against the Bank statement. Customer and vendor accounts are sub ledger GL's. We will have to create two reconciliation GLs in viz. While creating customer and vendor master records, we have to mention respective reconciliation GL in their company code segment details. This recon a/c will show you the net balances in GL for customer and vendor a/cs.
    OR
    Reconciliation a/cs( also called Control A/cs in pure accounting) are the net figures for items such as Drs and Crs of an organisation.  since it would not be possible to show the complete list of all vendors in the B/S, a recon a/c is maintained for the purpose. however, the main feature of a recon a/c is that the debits MUST equal the credits in each entry, and so no mistakes in entries are possible (at least mathematically). 
    Only if the organisation has a handful of suppliers and customers is it advised that no recon a/c is opened.
    You might have to create a report to check the equality of debits and credits in each entry.

Maybe you are looking for