Clearing of Open items (per Vendor)
Hi All,
I would like to ask if there is a way to show multiple line items of a single vendor as multiple line items and not the sum of these line items during clearing in F-04.
Right now, when clearing multiple line items of a single vendor, these line items will appear as one single item during simulation with the lump sum of all the line items being cleared. Is there a way of showing these items separately?
Ex.
User wants to clear Vendor 2000000000.
Open items for vendor 200000000 are as follows:
document 1 with amount 100
document 2 with amount 200
document 3 with amount 300
When clearing in F-04, user will select these three documents to clear.
During simulation, posting will be as follows:
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 600
CR CASH AMOUNT 600
Is there a way of showing it this way?
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 100
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 200
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 300
CR CASH AMOUNT 600
Thanks! Would appreciate your answers soon.
Hi,
The client requirement is that each time the user clears multiple line items of one single vendor or customer, separate line items will be displayed for each line item cleared.
If you use f-04 and clear multiple line items for a single customer or vendor, these line items are lumped into one line item.
Ex.
Doc. 1
Dr. Customer 1 100USD
Cr. Sales 100 USD
Doc 2
Dr. Customer 1 200 USD
Cr. Sales 200 USD
Upon clearing, two open items will be selected, the one with 100 USD and another one with 200USD,
Postings will be as follows:
Dr. Sample Account 300 USD
Cr. Customer 1 300 USD
Would it be possible if the posting of the clearing is
Dr. Sample Account 300USD
Cr. Customer 1 100USD
Cr. Customer 1 200 USD
Thanks.
Edited by: pinoy sap on Sep 23, 2008 11:29 AM
Similar Messages
-
Clearing of open items of Vendor or Customer by FIFO method
Dear Experts
All debit and credit entries on a customers or vendor account has to be cleared automatically. Now i want to clear the open items using FIFO procedure, that is credit entries on a customers account will be cleared against the oldest open invoice. The open items will be automatically matched by the system based on available credit.
Does anyone have had a similar issue? I
Thanks
Ravi Sankar N DHi Ravi,
SAP will pick these invoices for payment according to vendor open items which are due according to payment terms.
When it comes to customer invoices, clearing depends on when customer pays payment to particular invoice, these customer invoices will get cleared.
I assume you are talking more closely to intercompany scenario (If it is not intercompany invoices clearing, you should not worry mostly about customer invoices clearing), where you want to clear vendor invoices and customer invoices. So you need to incorporate entry date in your functionality to pick intercompany invoices clearing.
Thanks much
Raghu Kolla -
Partial payment tab problem when clearing two open items in vendor account
Dear All,
I have the problem with partial payment procedure.
As SAP is presenting the process, partial payment should work as follows (i.e. with vendor):
1. Incoming invoice is posted -> Credit -100
2. Credit note is posted -> Debit +20
3. Payment (without clearing) is posted to vendor account -> Debit +50
I'll run transaction F-44 and go to tab "Partial payment".
I see 3 items (as above).
I mark Item -100 and +20
I double click in filed next to -100 and it changes to -20
An now it should make no posting but only assignemet of one item to another.
But in my case, if I click "save" icon, it makes postings Debit 20 and Credit -20 on vendor account.
Is there any possibility that such clearing will not generate any posting but just make assignement of one item to another. Or maybe there is something wrongly configured in the system. At the moment the partial payment makes some kind of residual items.
Thanks in advance for replay.
Best regards
GregHello,
Yes, it's right, whenever we clear vendor or custmoer account, the system creates document, but as I remeber from other instalations, the document had header but there was no postings.
It case described, the system creates posting:
40 Vendor 20 EUR
50 Vendor 20 EUR
This is strange for me. As ther should be clearing document but with no postings.
Have you got any idea how to configure the system, so partial payment tab in clearing transactions creates clearing document but with no phisical postings.
Best regards
Greg -
Function or bapi returning customers or vendors with open items per plant
Dear experts.
may you please tell me which function or bapi can i use that will return all customers or vendors with open items per given plant. i have tried to use BAPI_AR_ACC_GETOPENITEMS and BAPI_AP_ACC_GETOPENITEMS but they return open items for a given customer and vendor respectively per given company code.ok but those 2 BAPIs return open items after providing the customer or vendor. what i need is a BAPI which returns a list of customers or vendors with open items
-
Hello!
Can anybody help to find a way how to clear customer open items when there is no reference number in use for customer. In electronic bank statemen there is only billing document number in TXT field. How to configure "Make Global Settings for Electronic Bank Statement" and "Define Search String for Electronic Bank Statement" for that purpose.
With all the best,
MerlinHello,
IMG => Financial Accounting => Bank Accounting => Business Transactions => Payment Transactions => Electronic Bank Statement => Make Global Settings for Electronic Bank Statement
Give your chart of Accounts
1. Create your account symbols
Create freely definable account symbols. Make sure that you are able to identify them when you are configuring in future steps.
2. Assigning Accounts to Account Symbols
Here you need to assign the account symbols to GL Accounts or you need to use masking logic. You must have designed your accounts in such a way that the end digits will work for posting the entries to FI. Account Modifier you use as + and use your local currency, if you do not have any foreign currency postings.
3. Create Posting Rules
Create freely definable posting rules.
4. Define Posting Rules (This is the most important configuration for your FI Postings / Clearings)
a) For all the payments you need to create the entries for posting area 1
b) For all the receipt you need to create the entries for posting area 1 and 2
c) Use the document type DZ in case if you want to clear the items. Use Posting type 8. If the invoice number is there in the reference field of bank statement, automatically the same will be selected by the system and cleared.
d) If you want just only entries to be posted use posting type 1.
e) If you want to clear the check, then use the posting type 4.
f) Configure according to the entries to be posted.
g) If you are going for clearing something the offsetting debit / offsetting credit (as the case may be) need not be given.
5. Create Transaction Type
Create freely definable Transaction Type
Select the transaction type and assign the external transactions to your posting rules.
For outgoing check use 13 as Interpretation Algorithm and 1 as the processing type.
Remaining all case use 1 (Standard algorithm) and 5 as the processing type.
Please also go through the below mentioned note in case if you are required to use further available interpretation algorithms or processing types.
6. Assign Bank Accounts to Transaction Types:
You need enter the Bank Key / Bank Account / Transaction type here.
You can get the the bank key and bank account details from table T012K (Go to SE16)
Further supplementary notes may be useful to you:
There are different programs to upload electronic bank statement.
FF.5 or FF_5.
I think your case Multicash format you are using.
You need have three files in FF.5 and two files in FF_5
You can prepare a Z program in order to truncate the electronic bank statement into two or three part files and save them on the application server.
1. Take all the external codes list from bank.
2. Take any available documentation from the Bank describing the relevance of the external codes.
3. Make sure that your Chart of Accounts (Bank Accounts) last digits logic is appropriate to meet the requirements.
4. Based on this decide the Account Symbols that are required to be created.
5. Make sure that the masking rules are configured properly.
6. Decide the posting rules that needs to be created.
7. Link up your external symbols provided by the bank with Posting rules and give proper algorithms for posting and clearing logic.
6. Concentrate on the posting areas to be posted while uploading the bank statement.
Further explanation would help you to understand the functionality when uploaded the electronic bank statement.
Main purpose of uploading the bank statement into SAP is to make your Bank Main Account and physical bank statement balance in sync.
You do not have any traditional Bank Reconciliation Statement (BRS) report in SAP.
SAP is normally you maintain bank main account and bank sub account. Whenever you make a payment through F-53 or F-58 or F110, the entry would be:
Vendor Account Dr
To Bank Sub Account
The ending digits of the sub-account would be important in configuring the masking rule. Based on this masking rule when you upload the bank statement the entry the system would pass is:
Bank Sub Account Dr
To Bank Main Account
It depends on the configuration, either the sub account will be cleared by the system automatically or you need to run F.13 to clear the sub accounts.
At the time of receipts, you have different accounting entries unlike payments. It needs to post to two posting areas. 1. GL Accounting 2. Sub-Ledger Accounting
The entries would system itself pass is:
Bank Main Account Dr
To Bank Sub Account
Bank Sub Account Dr
To Cutomer account.
Clearing logic mentioned for your posting rules and the alogrithm used for your external bank symbols will also play pivotal role in clearing the accounts.
Ideally you will use
FF67 / FF.5 / FF_5 for uploading manual or electronic bank statement
FEBA / FEBA_BANK_STATEMENT is used for furthe rprocessing.
GO THROUGH SAP NOTE 48854
Please go through SAP Note. 48854. You will get an idea regarding the functionality of the algorithms.
Though this note is in relevant to GB specific, you will find this very useful.
description follows below regarding the normal procedure for maintaining table T028G. Due to the different bank codes and posting rules, pre-Customizing is not possible at this point.
The following processing types are available - unless stated otherwise, you should use the interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation' in each case.
1. '00': There is no processing. The entry line is ignored.
2. '01': A validation is made whether an entry exists for the transferred check number in the check table (PAYR). The check number and payment document number are transferred for further processing. Interpretation algorithm: outgoing check processing '011'-'013'; the update in the check file is via the interpretation algorithm.
3. '02': Transfer of the ending balance to the electronic bank statement
4. '03': Transfer of the opening balance to the electronic bank statement
5. '04': Clearing via the allocation number which is delivered with the bank statement. No interpretation algorithm.
6. '05': Clearing of BACS payments or BACS bank collection. The reference text field is first read to ascertain whether it involves payments initiated by users or bank collection via BACS. Providing it does involve a cash transaction initiated by the user, the payment document numbers concerned are determined via the reference number and transferred as a reference to further processing. Interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation' or '019 - Reference number DME'.
Note
To differentiate between the two procedures in table T028G, you have to maintain two separate entries.
Example: the bank uses bank code '62' for cash receipts and for BACS bank collection.
Ext. Transaction +/- sign Posting rule Int. Algorithm Processing type 62 + GB62 001 5
62 SAPBACS + GB63 000 5
7. '06': Bank costs or interest revenues
Recommended interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation'
8. '07': Total amount of cash disbursements
9. '08': Total amount of cash receipts
10. '09': Items not paid
Recommended interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation'
Regards,
Ravi -
Clearing of open items- inter company transfer
Dear All,
I made some intercompany postings for vendor open items. When i am clearing the open items (receiver company code) of vendor through F-53 system says " No open items found". But through FBL1N i can see these as open items.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
SankarHi madhu,
OBYA - i already settings for inter company code postings. I already made that and make posting also.
Now the problem, i transfered open item of vendor(1) of 100(Dr) from sender company code(1234) to receiver company code(ABCD) to the vendor(2) 100(Dr).
when i did this transfer sender company open item nulified and the same open item transfer to the receiver company code with open item status.
Now i book one bill on vendor(2) receiver company code (ABCD) for 100(Cr). Now when i am clearing debit amount with credit amount through F-44 system generating a message that "open item not found"
i choose document number in additional selections.
Regards,
Sankar -
Intelligent Clearing of Open Items - Smart Layouts/Filters/Analysis
Greetings from Entebbe,
In the Financial Reporting service line, we are burdened to clean others mess! We are managing Missions Open Item Managed (OIM) Accounts. What we are doing, we pull each GL OIM Account (for eg 11711000 Cash Journal Clearing and 35109920 AP Cash Payment Clearing) with FAGLL03 - Open Item and then export to the Spreadsheet. We are spending not hours but days to analyze the Clearing Documents and thus minimize the Open Items using F-03.
I am desperately looking for three life saving information in SAP:
1. At all Transactions and Workflow, what are the Documents (AA - ZZ) are created and how there are related.
2. The combination of Documents that can be set together for a credit and debit same amount to clear the Open Items.
3. When FAGLL03, extracts the Open Items, why there is not standard Layout that brings the Credit and Debit Amounts together up and down? Why this T-Code does not have an intelligent Layout that filters all Open Item Documents together those can be cleared by F-03
Our leaves are not subject to approval unless we complete this horrendous task. I will be deeply grateful to your guidance.
Thanks, Javed @ RSC EntebbeHello,
There is a possibility for automatic clearing in SAP - function F.13.
You can make reconciliation for Vendor, customer and GL accounts (open item management).
Of course systen has to know the field to look for for doing reconciliation, I have used assignment field (anyway there is possibility to do some customizing).
Example: Value in assignment field is 1968 all documents with 1968 in assignment field - recon will be made by system.
So the reconciliation can be done as follows:
define accounts and field for reconciliation.
go through data and enter value for automatic reconciliation (as an instance data was dowloades in Excel) or think about data flow how it ca be updated automatically - how to do some checks?
Upload/Update data from Excel to SAP
Make reconciliation run in test mode.
Check data
Make reconciliation
check - how many control samples to make a statement about data quality?
What do you think?
I am looking forward to your answer.
Hope I was helpful.
all the best
Erwin -
Possibility of grouping open items per business partner during FPY1
Hello all,
In my test case, I have a business partner that is connected to two contract accounts.
On each connection I have two open items, so four in total.
When executing the payment program (FPY1), I would like to group the open items per business partner into 1 payment that goes to the bank.
Can you tell me whether this is possible and, if so, how to implement it?
Thanks in advance!Hi,
If I've got you right, there are several open items posted on different Contract Accounts. Let's assume a simple case. There are two Contract Account Relationships to one and the same Business Partner:
CA1-BP1 and CA2-BP1. BP1 is the holder of CA1 and CA2. In parallel BP1 is the only premium payer. There is no further Business Partner involved.
Additionally there are two Insurance Objects with relationships - each - to one and the same Business Partner: IO1-BP1 and IO2-BP1.
The first Insurance-Object-Relationship IO1-BP1 is assigned to CA1, and the second Insurance-Object-Relationship IO2-BP1 is assigned to CA2.
In FS-CD standard it's possible to group and summarize several open items on Business Partner level within a Payment Run (FPY1) cross different Contract Accounts. Therefore follwoing master data is required:
IO1-BP1: “IO: Settings Active for Contract Account” is set active
IO2-BP1: “IO: Settings Active for Contract Account” is set active
Master data in CA1-BP1
Incoming Payment Method "1" (example for Direct Debit)
Bank Details ID for Incoming Payment Method "0001" (example for 1st Bank Account of BP1)
Master data in CA2-BP1
Paid By [in 'Payment Data (General)']: "CA1" (means the number of Contract Account CA1, as Contract account used for payment transactions)
The challange is to populate initially or change these attributes from an external system properly, for instance from a Policy Management system, a Claims Management system, or an Incentive & Commission Management system. In many cases they have neither an understanding of the concept "Contract Account", nor capabilities to adjust or maintain FS-CD master data. Thus, it could be efficient to build specific UIs dedicated to such scenarios - intended to set the attributes properly.
If, and only if a payment aggregation, consoldiation or summarization is required regularly cross different Contract Accounts <without using FS-CD transfer postings and without using FS-CD Broker Collection>, it can be wise to create a dedicated Contract Account with relationship to the Payer (or Payee) as the relevant Business Partner for incoming or outgoing payments - initiated by the insurer.
It's a special ContractAccount-BusinessPartner-Relationship CAx-BPy that just holds the payment method and bank details ID as master data. This Business Partner is acting as Payer in Payment Transactions. If, and only if this Business Partner "BPy" differs from the relevant Business Partner "BP1" that is linked to the Contract Account, and is also the relevant Partner within the posted open items, than Partner "BPy" is the alternative business partner to the contract partner; used for clearing and paying the items of the contract account. Overall that's a powerful workaround for payment aggregation, consoldiation or summarization cross different Contract Account, even the Business Partner "BPy" is a different one. Under this precondition one has to feed the two fields
Payer [in 'Payment Data (General)'] with BPy
Paid By [in 'Payment Data (General)'] with CAx
In addition: within all subordinated InsuranceObject-BusinessPartner-Relationship master data the flag “IO: Settings Active for Contract Account” has to be set active. Therefore the InsuranceObject-BusinessPartner-Relationship master data doesn't control payments anymore, but the ContractAccount-BusinessPartner-Relationship master data.
Please test and let me know.
Best regards,
Jochem -
Validation not working when clearing an open item
Hi SAP Gurus,
We have a interesting scenario to discuss with you. We are using Legal Dunning Procedure so once legal action is intiated against the customer notifications are sent to the legal department if payments are received.
Unfortunately this can happen only during the next dunning run which of course can occur in varying time intrevals. Therefore we need a validation to occur if a payment is received from a customer against whom legal action has been initiated.
We tried using the following fields Date of the legal dunning proceedings, Dunning block, Dunning key, Dunning level but are not able to get the validation to work when attempting to clear the open item. These all work when trying to post a new document but fail when trying to clear a open item. Points will be given for helpful answers.
Regards,
Sivathis is the radio button
<af:selectOneRadio value="#{bindings.Gender1.inputValue}"
label="#{bindings.Gender1.label}"
required="#{bindings.Gender1.hints.mandatory}"
shortDesc="#{bindings.Gender1.hints.tooltip}"
id="sor5">
<f:selectItems value="#{bindings.Gender1.items}" id="si7"/>
</af:selectOneRadio>
i use this sample
http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/jdeveloper/11gdemos/ADF_Insider_Essentials/ADF_Insider_Essential_YesNoRadio/ADF_Insider_Essential_YesNoRadio.html -
Clearing of Open items - Critera - Auotomatic Payment Run
Dear Friends,
We have configured the Automatic Payment Run in the system and are in the process of maintaining the integration with the Bank. When we import the Electronic Bank Statement, we find that instaed of 'Value Date' some otehr reference gets populated in the assignment field in the line item for Bank Clearing Account, thus rendering it difficult to perform automatic clearing of open items. The first question is how to check what information is getting populated and why? Is there a way to find it out ?
Another thing is that we have been advised to maintain the substitution rule so that instead of some other reference, the Value Date gets substituted in the Assignment Field? Need the help of experts in finding out which information gets populated in the Assignment Field and second what is the method and config maintainence required for defining the Substitution Rule so that the Value Date gets captuerd in the Assignment Feild and which would help in perfroming the automatic clearing of open items.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,Hi,
Thanks for the prompt response. In FF.5 while importing the Bank Statement, the box for "Assign Value Date" was checked and in the GL Master of the Bank Clearing Account, the Sort Key has also been defined as 027 (Value Date). Even then in the line item posting for Bank Clearing Account, the reference from Document Header Text (Field Name BKTXT) gets populated in the Assignment Feild. Now the issue is that this field needs to be substituted with the value date. How to define the Substitution Rule? Another issue is what should be the second criteria defined in the system for clearing the Open Items in the Bank Clearing Account, since for the same value date there could be two identical items and only one may be cleared from the bank and other one may be outstanding?
Help from experts who have configured e banking would be highly appreciated.
Thanks!
Regards -
Payment run didnt pick the open items of Vendor(special G/L for downpmnt)
Hi,
Payment run didnt pick the open items of Vendor(special G/L for downpmnt). The line item is due on 2.11.2010.
The payment run was done on 12.11.2010. Why this line was not picked?
Edited by: Rudra Prasanna Mohapatra on Nov 14, 2010 11:11 AMHi Rudra,
In order for the special GL's to be selected for Payment run, you need to define them in your configuration.
Go to FBZP, click on All company codes, and double click on your company code, and check whether special GL is entered in vendors>Sp. G/L transactions to be paid.
Regards,
SAPFICO -
Bank Clearing Account - Open Item Clearing
Dear Friends,
We have maintained the configuration for importing the electronic bank statement and we have tested and found that the entries are getting posted in the Bank Clearing Account. However, we have encountered a major issue, when we perform the automatic payment run, the value date gets updated in the Assignment Feild, whereas the users want this to be updated with the combination of "Document No. + Value Date".
Secondly, when we import the bank statement, in the multicash format, the posted entries in the Bank Clearing Account have the "Document Header Text" field updated in the Assignment Field coloumn, thus making it difficult to do automatic clearing of open items. In these entries also it is desired that the combination of Document No. relating to the item paid thru payment run plus the Value Date should get update so that the open items in debit and credit can be matched and cleared off automatically.
Your help would be highly appreciated in achiveing these objectives.
RegardsThanks Murali. Another help needed is how can we change the values in Assignment Feild, which is now getting picked up from the Document Header Text? We need the original Docuemnt No. + Value Date to get populated in the Assignemnt Field in the entries posted while importing the electronic bank statement.
Would appreciate your help.
Regards -
Document is getting posted but unalble to clear the open items
hi gurus,
i m using the inbound idoc ACC_DOCUMENT03 to post the receipt against invoice. uptill now i can post the receipt but it shows the items are still in the open items. i need to clear the open items for the invoice. how to solve it .Hi,
In the Company code global parameters(OBY6),select the check box "NO FOREX RATE DIFF.WHEN CLEARING IN LC"
and try clearing again.(You can have a F1 help on the check box to see what exactly it is).
Hope this will resolve
Assign points if useful
Thanks
Aravind
Edited by: Aravind Aitipamula on May 22, 2008 1:36 AM -
EBS posting to clear customer open items - Function not working?
Hello SAPers
I have an issue I just canu2019t seem to resolve! We are receiving MT940 statements and receive customer invoice reference details with field: 86 as follows:
:61:090910C1500,00FOSB1000270 //100909050 0 035315
:86:DEPOSIT
Remitter:1000270 MISSION AUSTRALIA Ref:1200000017
Immediately following the BTC FOSB the bank quotes the customer number however I am not using this as standard SAP should identify the customer by document number within the note to payee field?
I am using a 2 step process in posting to the clearing account and customer. Config as follows:
Pst Type 1
40 Bank
50 Clearing
Pst type 2
40 Clearing
15 BLANK DZ 3 15
I have also set up a string to look for the documents ^(12########)$. When we load the statement the first posting is successful however the second does not post to the customer or clear based on the invoice reference. I am using algorithm 020. The error that occurs is F5 102 Customer does not exist in company code xxxx. It actually does exist in the company code.
I have loaded the EBS to the buffer and simulated the search on BELNR and it picks up the document?
I am sure this is standard and a CMOD is not required on this type of functionality? What have I not done to allow posting to the customer based on document number or to post on account where it is not cleared?
Any assistance on this issue is appreciated? Thanks in advance.Function Module for GL open Items
how to clear customer open items by another customer open item
Function Module for GL Open Items
Reward points.. -
Function module to clear customer open items
Hi ,
I have a requirement in FI module to clear the customer open items through Function Modules. The standard functionality is done through the tcode f-28 / f-32.
Please let me know if there is any program or Function Module to clear the customer open items.(without using BDC).
Thanks in advance.Function Module for GL open Items
how to clear customer open items by another customer open item
Function Module for GL Open Items
Reward points..
Maybe you are looking for
-
Finance on a new Intel Mac mini
Hi, My mac min has just died and i was wondering if i should get the new Intel 1, after just claiming on insurance for my powerbook it seems abit dodgy to claim again, how old in the UK do you have to be to take out finance, as a 15 year old, i havnt
-
How to Filter a DVWP for other list items with same name?
I have 2 lists, Clients & Engagements. The Engagements list has a lookup field to the Clients list (to the Title). The Engagements list often has more than on listing (job) for the same client at one time. I am trying to create a DisplayForm on the E
-
Hi, we have written a script with multiple parameters.when ever we will try to execute the Script with the parameters it is working fine. but whenever we will executing it through the transaction SM49 we are getting the below error. error details: co
-
Lightroom cc 2015 does not lunch
lightroom cc 2015 does not lunch - quits after showing preview for 1 second
-
I can't open anything adobe related.
I tried to open Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign, and they all open and close immediately. I get the bouncing icon in my dock and then they quit. I tried opening CC to uninstall and reinstall these applications, but I can't even open my Cloud applica