Clearing rule for BRS

Hi,
can any one please tell me how BRS happens in SAP, and on which basis documents cleared after the BRS. My intention asking this question is that where we are making the settings for clearing a document. I hope my questiion is clear. Iam expecting step by step explaination.
Thank& regards
Shankar chitupolu

Hi:
       Welcome to SDN..if you are on manual BRS FF67 then following is the procedure to change the clearing rules. BRS gets posted as per setting in clearing rules ..Based on assignment number or reference number BRS gets posted to main account. Hi:
Please follow as given and hopefully it will help you...
1...Go to SPRO...Financial Accounting....Bank...Business transactions...Payment Transactions...Manual Bank Statement..Create a new transaction with sign - and do not assign anything in posting rule for now and enter 15 (based on it data will be entered in assignment field) in Algorithm field , save.
2...In define posting keys and posting rules...create an account symbol for the one you did in step 1..In Assign account to account symbol please use account symbol created earlier and acc mode + and currency should be + too. In GL Account area please list the outgoing GL initials which you are using for outgoing postings..
In create key for posting rule define a posting rule and now go back to step 1 and assign the posting rule you created to the transaction type
In define posting rules please maintain posting rule as define above...in posting area assign 1. give nothing in first posting key.assign account symbol as created earlier...now give give posting key 50..give account credit Bank...and a suitable document you use for posting BRS...In posting type give 4.
Your Manual Bank statement is ready ....
Go to FS00 select your bank outgoing GL account there and in create/bank.interest tab double click on Field status group..in general data make assignment number mandatory for posting...
Go to FB50....post and outgoing transaction using the GL given above it will require you to enter assignment number enter 123 and post. In FF67 Select the new statement , proceed with your normal data entry and give the transaction you created in above , enter value date, amount and in bank ref field enter 123 as given in FB50.
Save and post it. Now it should work.
Regards
Edited by: Atif Farooq on Oct 9, 2011 6:21 PM

Similar Messages

  • Automatic Clearing Rule for Customers

    Hi,
    I have a query regarding Automatic clearing rules for the Customers.
    I want to clear all the debit balances against all credit balances for each customer (irrespective of the assignment). The exact amounts are not matching though.
    Can this be configured for Cusomers in 'Automatic Clearing Rules'?
    Please Advise.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Safi

    Hi,
    You can use the transaction code F-32 to clear debit and credit items of a customer account. You can only clear open items from one account. You can use this function to clear debits and credits that balance to zero (for example, invoices and payments that have already been entered into the customer account).
    Reward points if it is helpful.
    Thanks
    Ram

  • FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

    Hi Folks,
    We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
    Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4;  Group: 019
    Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
    I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); Clearing rule is working perfectly during payments, however for account maintenance and automatic clearing it's not applying the credits against security deposits first. I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
    Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Santosh

    Santosh:
    This rule will not work in account maintenance.  You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work.  Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments.  You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
    regards,
    bill.

  • Clearing Rules for Defferals

    We have requirement where if the deferral date is populated in the document  or item then any incoming payment should not clear that item or document in cases where deferral date is in future,
    Any item with no deferral date should clear, any excess payment should be posted as on account payment,
    deferral items or document should only clear if the deferral date is in the equal to or less than to system date
    I need help in setting up clearing rules to support above requirement, please extend your help.

    Hi,
    If you are unable to get the desired result through configuration, then code custom program logic  in FI-CA Event 110 to distribute your incoming payment amount.
    In this Event, you can inspect for the attributes of the items to be cleared (e.g. Deferral Date greater than payment date), and decide on the amount to be posted as Payment on Account.
    If you are not familiar with FI-CA Events, go into transaction FQEVENTS and read the function module documentation for Event number 110.
    Regards,
    Ivor M.

  • Different clearing rules in SAPF124

    Hi Gurus,
    usually we use the filed ZUONR as automatic Clearing rule for GR/IR account.
    Now we have a Company code, which has a another Content in this field. We could use fields EBELN and EBELP.
    The rules I store in customizing..are they like "and-rules" or is this like an "or" - this is because we can not set the rule by company code and of course we still need the ZUONR rule... so if it is an "and" we don't have a chance here anyway...
    2.) Any suggestions how to solve it?
    Many thanks in advance!
    Sandra

    Hi Sandra
    The conditions in OB74 are "AND" conditions.
    Since, we cannot set the criteria at company code level, I would suggest that you use different G/L accounts for the purpose of different criteria.
    Since, COA has a vast number of G/L accounts, you can look for some G/L numbers which are not used in any other company code as of now and use them for your purpose only in this particular company code after configuration.
    Regards
    Sowmya

  • FICA: clearing rules to applying payments against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

    Hi Folks,
    We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
    Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4;  Group: 019
    Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
    I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); However, I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
    Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Santosh
    Moderator update - question solved with FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date
    Message was edited by: William Eastman

    Santosh:
    This rule will not work in account maintenance.  You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work.  Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments.  You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
    regards,
    bill.

  • Need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules

    Dear All,
    My requirement is to enhance the automatic clearing rules for tcode ff_5.
    Program RFEBKA00 will upload bank statement items based on the external transaction codes provided by the banks .
    The standard posting rules will clear a GL bank account using a set of algorithms for further interpretation set of standard algorithms do not meet the clearing criteria.
    Hence I need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules. EXIT ZXF01U01 / FEB_BADI are triggering before posting the document.
    So we cannot use these. Please suggest me regarding the same.
    Thanks in advance
    Somu.

    Hi,
           Did you get a solution for this problem from any other means? Cause I am also facing the same problem. It will be great if you can  help me in this regard.
    Thanks
    Sudheer K

  • Invoice reference field in Clearing rules

    Hi
    I am trying add field REBZG-Invoice reference in OBIA t.code (Clearing rules for GL) . Requirement is while clearing the document system has to post separate clearing document for each invoice.
    Then system saying field not permitted.
    Pls advice
    Thanks in advance
    Sneha

    Hello,
    In the customer master set the grouping KNB1-ZGRUP
    Also select "single payment" check box.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • GRIR - Criteria set in OB74 - Additional rule for automatic clearing

    Hi,
    WIth reference to the subject of this post, I would like to have advice on the commonly used criteria for the GRIR GL account.
    My GL master for this GRIR settings: sort key is 010: Purchase order no., which is EBELN (Tcode: OB16).
    Currently the settings at OB74 - Additional rule for automatic clearing for my GRIR are as follows:
    DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur.
    ZUONR, Assignment
    EBELN, Purchasing Document
    My issue is due to the criteria of DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I am not able to clear the GRIR GL using F.13, and after I remove the criteria: DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I manage to clear all my GR and IR entries which have 0 balance in amount in local currency.
    KIndly advise.
    P/S: DO I need to have the following settings, additionally?
    Define Tolerance Groups for G/L Accounts
    Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
    Assign Users to Tolerance Groups
    Create Accounts for Clearing Differences
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks.
    But my problem is as follows:
    My issue is due to the criteria of DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I am not able to clear the GRIR GL using F.13, and after I remove the criteria: DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I manage to clear all my GR and IR entries which have 0 balance in amount in local currency.
    Do you have any idea?

  • Incident rule for clear

    I have an Incident rule for metric alerts that sends a notification when a metric alert is CRITICAL..
    I would also like to receive notification when that critical alert goes back to CLEAR..
    I edited it and chose both CRITCAL AND CLEAR..
    but now I get clear messages from all events, warning, info, ect..
    how do I only get the clears when it was critical

    Hi,
    Specific transitions between severities (e.g. critical --> clear) are not currently supported. This would be an enhancement for us. Could you please file an enhancement request for this (or work with Support to file an enhancement request)? Please include details of the use case in the enhancement request.
    thanks
    Ana

  • Projects Release  - Error: Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without val

    Hi Experts ,
    While Releasing Projects , we got error :
    Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without a Validity limit.
    Message No : KD059.
    Diagnosis:
    The settelement Profile used requires you to define a distribution rule for asset . For period 005 , 2009 , however not created a distribution rule for Asset.
    We gave checked Settelement Profile , still we are not clear what settings is causes for this error ,
    Please throw some light on if some one come across ...
    Regards,
    Sujana

    check out OSS note 115618

  • What Are the Exact Basic rules for Replying a Thread...... -:)   @};-

    Hi Experts,
    After Looking into the forums many days I had a small conclusion about forums,
    SAP Forums are better place I have seen for getting a goo dhelp & Knowledge...
    Why can't we make it a BEST Place.
    This is just a small doubt which I would like to clear myself first,
    I have seen many users In the forums asking for a Basic Questions
    When cleared, But still they want to have a Spoon feeding with a Sample Code.
    When Sample Code Given they will provide the original code and requests for Modifications.
    These always looks to me as crazy.
    I have seen somelong time agin by moderators posting that In SCN there will be no SPOON FEEDING.
    I am not sure whether if still this Rule AVAILABLE or NOT.
    Ok if the task is really difficult let them ask again and again,
    And it was not replied, let them repost, I agree with them.
    And How about a User Registered in SDN very long back and asking for a silly question in below thread,
    [Sendin Email to the recipent list -Need correct FM |Getting the address from shipto partner of Bil. item not directly from C.ma]
    This is one more example, really funny, The thread poster needs the solution at any cost, he doesn't require and Suggetions,,, {He Only needs Solution}
    [Radio Buttons |Radio Buttons;
    [Turning Off Debugger |Turning Off Debugger;
    [Regarding Amount in words|Regarding Amount in words;
    There are 100's of threads like this....Everyone knows this facts.
    Check this who answered this one and who replied correct answer, who copied, finally who was rewarded...!
    [how to validate POsting period |Re: how to validate POsting period]
    Now My Real Problem is....!
    User is always intelligent, Only the weakness is in Contributor, trying to help them,..,
    And I openly say that Someone requesting for basic help is not DUMB, But the Contributor replying forgets
    the basic rules " Why Contributing ?"
    According to me It's not the Requestor to see Rules & Requlations before posting the threads,
    But its responsibilty for the Contributing person to see th Rules & Requlations before replying the threads,
    If we follow the rules and stand on a single word or rule or anything there will be Good Result.
    Major Problem is in US not anyone else.
    Example Some one saying search in the forum,,, then please no replies after that...
    But we are very pity hearted again we post the solution,,,
    But it is not at all enough(for cintribtor's)... they will copy the solution and post again by slight Modifications,
    And Some users are having 500,600,700,800 Posts with 0 points, registered long long back.
    They are completly dependent on forums,,, As they goto office and as they eat, The same they open forums and ask Queries...
    They will never realize what they are doing,, and we will never let them improve better...
    Finally Lets Discuss About this and Correct & Suggest me if I am wrong,
    Is my thoughts are going in the right way or not I am not even sure... Please Aslo Correct me if I did any mistakes.
    Thanks & regards,
    Dileep .C
    Edited by: Dileep Kumar Chinnaiah on Apr 29, 2009 12:33 PM
    Title Changed Form
    "What to do when someone asking for Basic Questions" to "What Are the Exact Basic rules for Replying a Threads...... "

    Hi Stephen,
    Very useful Information,
    First tell me a little something about my self...
    After completion of my certification(as a fresher) I was down the streets hunting the job,
    with the insufficient knowledge and being a non-experienced person, I never got one.
    And mean while when I got my "S-UserID", I used to be proud, To say frankly, I registerd in SDN & SAP all at a time, without even knowing what I can do there..,
    When I got a job afterwords I was doing the job and never seen SDN page for many months,
    when I came to know that of we have doubts we can post at SDN. then started requesting help,
    I posted only a little, I didnot got the proper response. on that day I decided,
    still there are some places where we cannot get help on time and there will be people waiting to get help,
    Why cant I put some of my efforts to help others.
    Then I searched some topic by Topic in SDN topic by Topic I used to read threads just for knowledge.
    when I feel my self comfort for contributing, I started contibuting...!
    If you haven't read it, take a look first, so you can understand where things are now.
    I dont know where things are now. But these in this thread I mentioned clearly what I seen from the day I started contributing.
    I searched with the terms of 'Rules for replying', The results are not as I expected, and this link has subject as
    "O SDN, where art thou?" So it dosent hit my in the list.
    Like everybody until a certain stage I am also rushing for points.
    But I most cases I never tried to copy paste answers. If I done some then that is just to point it myself some day,
    I have no hopes or no intrest on the points...! This was discussed with Rob & Matt, at my inital contribution where my points are 36.
    From that day till date I have changed a lot to myself.
    Everyone cannot change like me because they are not like me & And I dont even expect that...!
    I will be online almost 6-8Hrs a day, Not even getting intrest to see the forums just because of the co-contributors.
    My only point is I am just requesting to a co-contributor,
    Clearly In a example : Lets say contributor has replied to a thread, and if you know that is a correct solution,
    please dont reply any more, If you have a better solution than that, then only reply,
    Even there is one reply in the thread not a matter, if correct answer leave that query.
    If still error persists, Show up with your Idea's...
    Dont let down the contributor, by copying his reply and editing and pasting(edit only if incorrect).
    I am just looking for this one exactly to circulate between ourselfs.
    For this we a little support from moderators to circulate(may be as a rule or may be as a mail to them)
    You may say again how many mails we have to send, It dosent matter, one mail to one person one time,
    and +ve factors will show up definetly.
    A real contributor always understand what I am talking about, but some one who hunts for points will never.
    I am really sorry if I am troubling with my doubts & requests,
    If so, Pleae forgive me,,
    Thanks & regards,
    Dileep .C

  • Change Rules for Line item

    Hi,
    I have customized the change rules for Line item.
    Still the system not allowing to make changes to that particular field? Can any one tell me, whats the reason for the same.
    Following Field is made as changeable for the line item.
    BSEG-VBUND             Trading partner.
    The above field is available in More data Tab or additional data tab while making entry or display of document.
    Thanks,
    Lalatendu

    Hi,
    That i know, but trading partner was not entered in the GL Master data. Infact some one wrongly entered Trading partner in Customer master and during bank posting system automatically picked Trading partner.
    When thye r trying to clear open items for that GL account , because of that assignment system is not allowing to clear those line item.
    If i can remove that trading partner from document, my problem will be solved.
    Can any one guide me..or if u need more info please let me know.
    Thanks,
    Lalatendu

  • EBS - Electronic Bank Statement Multiple Posting Rule for One External Transaction Type NTRF

    hello SAP Gurus,
    I'm configuring EBS - Electronic Bank Statement. My requirement is for Bank External Transaction Type NTRF <for Incoming Payment> I want to assign 2 posting rules for Posting Area 2 that is Sub-Ledger posting viz. <1> For the payments received from Customer which should clear the Customer Open item since it is bill to bill exactly matching the open line item and <2> For the payments which should not clear the Customer Open item since i know that they are not bill to bill and only partial against the original line item
    Is this possible? if yes then how?
    Currently, SAP allows only one assignment like one external transaction type NTRF => one Posting Rule <either clear the sub-ledger-system picks FB05 or just post on Sub-ledger so that not to clear - system uses FB01 >
    Journal for Posting Area 2:
    Bank Clearing Account Dr
       To Customer Account Cr  <either set this to clear with original invoice / or just post on customer so as to clear/handle it manually later on once paid fully>
    So, what is the solution; how can i differentiate my incoming whether fully payment or partial payment; since bank statement always tag it to external transaction type NTRF always for any incoming payments !
    regards,
    `raj. 

    Hi,
    You cannot create separate rule with sub ledger postings while executing electronic bank reconciliation.The reason is your bill to bill transfers should posted to bank sub ledger account first and then you can write a BDC to clear sub ledger account.Otherwise use F.13 to clear the sub ledger account.
    Regards
    Chrishantha

  • P2P fulfillment and Clearing rule interaction

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue related to Promise to Pay (P2P).
    We are using FP2P1 to create P2P.  The open items listed in FP2P1 creation screen appear to be sorted based on net due date (ascending), document number( ascending), amount (descending).  The user selects the open items from the top and downward, until the promised amount is exhausted.  When the payment is posted, the clearing sequence configured in the clearing variant is that first by the cash discount due day (ascending), division (ascending) and main transaction (ascending).  Therefore, the payment would clear the items that not included in the P2P, however, the fulfillment is calculated based on the each P2P item's clearing status. For example, the customer has promised to pay $200.  P2P includes document A, B, C for the total of 200.  The customer paid $200 before the check date.  However, the payment has cleared document A, D, E.  When the P2P is evaluated, it is not fulfilled because only document A is cleared.
    I would like to sort open items in the FP2P1 creation screen in the sequential order that is consistent with our clearing rule.  I checked event 182 to 191, but not sure if one of them is called at time of open item selection.  Do you think it is possible to add open item sorting logic in event 187? 
    Thank you very much for your help.
    Jennifer

    Hi Amlan,
    Thank you for your suggestions.
    Our clearing rule reflects the regulatory and business requirements and therefore we cannot change it. If we create P2P based on the standard SAP open item sorting logic, and then clear them first, it would violate our clearing rule. 
    I do not quite understand your suggestion - "The P2P items against the customer account can be put on direct debit".  Could you please elaborate it if you get a moment?  Thank you!
    I just received SAP's reply to my OSS message.  Below is the reply: 
    "I checked the situation in our reference system and I found out that
    the displayed fields of the open item processing in transaction fp2p1
    results from customizing (under FI-CA=>Basic Functions=>Open Item
    Management=>Define Line Layout Variants for Open Item Processing).
    Unfortunately there is no possibility to define a default sorting
    variant. Also in the open item processing itself is no option to
    define a default sorting. As the functionality does not exist I
    recommend you to fill a development request. In SAP note 11 you'll
    find more information about it."
    Jennifer

Maybe you are looking for