Clearing Status in Tcode-FPL9

Hi,
Requirement:
When I view a contract account using FPL9 I am want to see the clearing status in left most column as it appears in FICO - open, cleared ect
I have made necessary configuration in Tcode FQKPM.
Please suggest.

Satyajeet:
The standard line layout has the iem status indicator (AMPEL) in the left most column.  If that does not fit your needs, then you could use field AUGST.  Placing them in your variant display is done in the variant details.
regards,
bill.

Similar Messages

  • Get parked items moved into a cleared status with out actually posting the

    Hi,
        I need to find a way to get parked items moved into a cleared status with out actually posting the item for payment.  I do not have a PO or goods receipt to post them to. There are some invoicese which we are not paying but we want to keep those items in the history of the vendor. I need to be able to run a parked report of open items and not have these pull into that report.  I have a some parked invoices  for various vendors that I need to get moved into the cleared status.
    Requesting you to provide suggestion on this to proceed.
    Thanks and regards,
    Rj.

    hi,
    i dont think there is any suh format.as per my knowledge u have to post park documents then only it would clear.
    Regards,
    Greeshma

  • VF11 wrongly created with RV Doc type and with not clear status.

    Hi All
    Issue: There are 2 billing documents which were created(VF01) in March are canceled (VF11) in May. Cancel document is saved with a message (No automatic clearing of billing document XXXXXXXXX) and message diagnosis saying that u201CThe Automatic clearing of billing document and reversal is not possible. This may be, for example, because the line item update is deactivatedu201D
      In the SD document flow cancel billing document is created and it's posted to accounting with Document type RV(which is not configured in the billing  types) and it is in not clear status.
    2 Sales order types are ZNRC(No Rebate u2013 Credit)    second is ZCR (CM Req With Refer).
    Order Type  : ZNRC , Billing type :ZG2, Cancel billing type :Z5, Accounting document in billing type for ZG2: is DG and accounting document in cancel billing type Z5 is :(_) blank.
    Order type:  ZCR Billing type :G2, Cancel billing type :S2, Accounting document in billing type for G2: is DG and accounting document in cancel billing type S2 is :(_) blank.                                                
          FI document type Not maintained in the cancel billing type configuration because this should be determine by reversal document type DA which is maintained in DG document type from FI side. It will be triggered in VF11)
    The above configuration is working with the order created VA01,billing VF01 and cancelling VF11 done in same period. If the order and billing done in old period and canceling(VF11) done in current period than FI document creating with RV document type and with not clear status in the document flow.
    I reviewed similar issues with SAP Note and with below explanation:
              "There are 2 procedures that are possible when Vf11 is posted.
              Old Procedure - An FI "Reversal" document was created that was not connected with the orignal.
              New Procedure - A Real FI reversal was carried out with clearing."
    In this case, our system is following with new procedure except above mentioned orders created in previous period and and canceled in current period.
      My Questions are: How the RV document is getting triggered here? why the cancel document (Reversal FI Doc) is not clearing?
         Appreciate your answers or suggestions.
    Thanks in advance,
    Sunil
    Edited by: Sunil kumar Matta on Jun 9, 2011 3:40 PM

    Thank you Ivano.
      I referred SAP note 1259505 and 339928. But initially we thought of none of the symptoms mentioned in the SAP note are matching with our issue. Then we contacted SAP online support and they suggested checking one SAP note (Mentioned above).
      Our system is following new cancellation procedure, but itu2019s failing only for some few documents.
      Finally we identified several reasons for the issue. One is profitability segment in the billing document and cancelled document is different due to some changes in segment assignments. Another one is consolidation- consolidation document does not exist in the billing document list but it is getting created in Canceled document (VF11).(Consolidation postings are switched off some time back and now itu2019s on)
      After some discussions it is decided to include accounting document type (Reversal) in cancel billing types to avoid default RV document type in canceled billing document accounting document. And non-cleared documents need to be created manually in F-32.
      Thread is closed.
    Sunil

  • BPEXT - External Business Partner Field is cleared in BP Tcode

    Hi All,
    Making any change in the customer/partner details in XD02 Tcodefor the same customer number, the BPEXT - External Business Partner field is getting cleared in BP TCode as well as from the table BUT000
    Please let us know for any SAP Note or workaround through which we can solve this issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards.
    Abhinav

    Hi,
    Please go to TCode SNRO and check if the buffering is active for object BU_PARTNER.
    If yes, you should disable it to have a sequential numbering.
    Go to Edit menu - set up buffering - no buffering
    Best regards,
    Itajaci Júnior

  • View VAT Info in Tcode FPL9

    Hi ,
    Customer account is being viewed in tcode FPL9. I would like to know if i can view the VAT for each transaction via FPL9.
    Appreciate feedback from anyone whose familiar with this TCODE. Is any config needed for this.
    Thank you.
    From, Maithili.

    HI,
    Yes, this question is for FI-CA.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Maithili

  • How to clear status "Error in process"?

    Hi All,
    I need help to clear the status of my invoice in SRM. The invoice status is "error in process". We checked in backend and reprocessed the IDOC through WE19 instead of BD87 and the invoices are posted now in backend. But the status of the invoices still shows "error in process" in SRM. I do understand that we should not use WE19 and should have processed it through BD87.
    I checked in SRM and the enteries exists in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB table for these invoices, just tried to run CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2 but no help.
    Please help
    Thanks, Sachin

    please read all below
    An IDoc BBPIV is sent if an invoice is released in the BBP system.In the invoice the statuses I1022 "Release granted" and I1017 "In transfer" are set.In addition, for the background job (see below) an entry is written to table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
    Unless I1017 is not set again to inactive, all previous operations are not allowed (in particular all changes to the invoice), that is, they are stopped by the program. The sending of the IDOC is checked by the background job CLEAN_REQREQ_UP. The report reads the BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB and makes a RFC (remote function call) per META_GOODSMVT_UPDATECHECK to check the posting of inbound IDocs.If the IDoc is posted successfully (status 53), the BBP invoice receives status I1018 "Transferred to backend".In addition, the entry is deleted in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
    If the IDoc is posted incorrectly (status 51, no follow-on document), the status of the invoice is set to I1019 "Transfer failed".The entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB remains as is, that is, the status of the IDOCs in the backend system is still checked by the background job.The sending of the IDOC is checked by the background job CLEAN_REQREQ_UP.If the IDoc has not (yet) arrived in the backend system, the entry also remains as is.
    Status I1018 allows to reverse the invoice in the future. In case of status I1019, a deletion is (again) possible.
    The following must be considered when processing an incorrect IDoc in the backend system:
    a) Further process the same IDoc (BD87), instead of copying and correct the IDoc with Transaction WE19 since in the latter case, the background job cannot find the (copied) IDoc and the invoice posted from that. In this case the BBP invoice would remain endlessly in status "incorrect", the entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB would never be deleted and the background job would always make the RFC at every run.In addition the BBP invoice would never receive the status "paid" (see below).
    b) If the IDoc cannot be corrected or the error in the backend system cannot be solved, the IDoc remains in status "incorrect".In this case the BBP invoice should be deleted and the entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB should be deleted manually or with a self-written report.
    Additional information: As of EBP Release 4.0 or after the implementation of Note 601470 or the import of the relevant Support Package, the entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB is deleted by the program (during the deletion of the invoice). Then the manual deletion is no longer required.
    The following section does not correspondingly apply to the confirmation, but only applies to the invoice.
    Status I1020 "paid" is set in the invoice by using the second background job BBP_IV_UPDATE_PAYMENT_STATUS to check the payment status of the follow-on invoice in the FI backend system for all invoices from the selection area.This only occurs for BBP invoices with status I1018 "Transfer to backend". To read the FI documents, META_FI_DOCUMENT_READ_40B is used.

  • 2 Status List (tcode SE41) mixed-up by the system

    Hi,
    I created 2 status list  PF100 & PF200 for one program via tcode SE41, but I found that the system mixed the 2 status list together, I mean, If I create one icon in the application toolbar for status list PF200, the icon may occurs in PF100 but not in PF200, so what's the problem?
    Please kindly advise.
    Thanks and best regards.

    solved by myself

  • Suppress Message / Clear Status line

    Hello Gurus,
    I am using function module MB_PHYSICAL_INVENTORY in a RF-transaction. There I am collecting all return messages into an itab to show a protocol in a small popup.
    The problem is, after completition of the posting a message (type S) is shown in status line (e.g. "Diffs in phys. inv. doc. 240307242 posted with m. doc. 3702433524").
    Is it possible to suppress this message somehow or is there a way to clear the status line manually (w/o displaying another message)?
    Help is much appreciated,
    Alej
    PS: Points will be rewarded for helpful answers!

    The complete process is using three function modules. The first is the above mentioned MB_PHYSICAL_INVENTORY. Even if this function module was executed successful (BLING message appears on the status line), the other two could have run incorrect.
    For Example:
    FM 1 correct (Status message)
    FM 2 correct
    FM 3 ERROR
    So I want to display the user a complete log of the results of all function modules and the user shouldn't think 'Everything was fine!' because of the message of the first FM.
    I hope I could clarify my problem.

  • How to get rid of "Delivery costs have not been cleared" status = MM_EKKO

    Hi dear experts,
    During pretreatment of MM_EKKO archiving object (TA: SARA), I get an amazing huge amount of PO position which can not be archived due to "*Delivery costs have not been cleared*".
    I tried several ways to find out how to solve this issue but without any success.
    Point is that we do not clear delivery cost regarding those PO positions, but delivery cost are transfered directly to a global account.
    It means that those PO's won't never be cleared.
    Any ideas about how I can fix this issue?
    Best regards,
    Daniel

    Yep,
    no idea why, but when I uncheck the "Final Invoice" box save and went back into the same PO and check again the same "Final Invoice" box, then, as a miracle, SARA=>MM_EKKO=> Pretreatment knows that this document is cleared and can be archived.
    It is just that for now, really old PO's are located in the present residence time
    I hope this slyness will help someone else one day.
    Regards,
    Daniel
    Edited by: Daniel Putzschler on Jul 28, 2009 2:02 PM

  • Phone reset does not clear status screen

    we have a couple of applications that reset the phones. we have noticed that a reset on a 7941 does not clear the display (that is, the old message "Resetting, please wait ..." remains on the screen). The 7940s and 7960s are fine. does anyone know why this is?
    Version in use is:
    Load File TERM41.7-0-2SR1S
    App Load ID Jar41.72-1-0-1.sbn
    JVM Load ID cvm41.72-1-0-1.sbn
    OS Load ID cnu41.72-1-0-1.sbn
    Boot Load ID boot41.3-2-2-0.bin
    I also have tried SCCP41.8-2-2S
    And SCCP41.8-0-4SR3AS
    (These are the latest available on CCO)

    Marc,
    The Factory reset or Restore to Factory defaults is geared towards the "Configuration" of the DMP.  The contents within flash are not removed as you have seen.  The FAQ that you reference is a good way to remove the files if so desired.  So the DMP is working as designed.
    If this answers your question, Please take time to mark this
    discussion answered & rate the response.
    Thank You!
    T.

  • Change status profile tcode BS02

    Hi....
    I have 5 status for  a document
    for example
    1 Unconfirmed
    2 Invalid
    3 Confirmed
    4 Ammended-Unconfirmed
    5 Ammended-Confirmed
    Unconfirmed  is the default status set.
    From Status Unconfirmed it can go to Invalid or Confirmed
    From Status Invalid it can go to Ammended-Unconfirmed
    From Status Confirmed it can go to Invalid or Unconfirmed
    From Status Ammended-Unconfirmed it can go to Invalid or Ammended-Confirmed
    From Status Ammended-Confirmed it can go to Invalid or Ammended-Unconfirmed
    I gave the Highest and Lowest status as below. Please correct me If I am wrong
    lowest      highest
    1     3
    1     5
    1     4
    2     5
    2     5
    Regards

    Hi,
    How about this setting.
    1     3
    2     4
    1     3
    2     5
    Edited by: UDAYNATH KRISHNAN on May 8, 2009 7:42 AM

  • Config for deductor status in Tcode: J1INQEFILE (under organisation data)

    Dear Sir/Madam,
    We want to config the deductor status. In the J1INQEFILE t code we get this field which is mandatory. We are trying to find out the configuration path for this. Where do we go (node) for the configuration of this status.
    Regards
    Prashant Zinge

    Hi,
    You can not configure the Duductor status.
    SAP has hard coded the values in the Domain of this field. Go to transaction SE11 and enter J_1IDDCTSTATUS in the domain field. On the next screen, in the tab "Value Range", you can see the values hardcoded by SAP.
    If you need any other value to be configured and it is legal requirement, then open an OSS note with SAP.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • TP clear - status T_STEP_UNKNOWN in  sapnames

    Hi,
    I have 63 local change request with status unknown.
    In the check.log (tp version 340.16.24 release 640) there are:
    check>WARNING: DV1K929600 has status T_STEP_UNKNOWN in  sapnames/LEICHE.
    The CR is correctly DV1K92960 but I haven't sapname LEICHE in my system.
    Who can give me help?
    Best regards
    Sonia

    Hello,
    I ran into the same funny situation. In the usr/sap/trans/sapnames we have a pretty large file
    LEICHE (Size 11484741)
    I am sure nobody renamed this file or system manually.
    Best regards, Henning

  • GR/IR Clearing by tcode F.19

    Hi All,
    Iam getting below error during the posting of GR/IR Clearing adjustment through tcode F.19
    Document splitting: Items for clearing 4050/800003/2011/001 not found
    Message no. GLT0002
    Diagnosis
    Document splitting cannot perform clearing because it was not possible to find complete splitting information on the items to be cleared (company code, document number, fiscal year, item).
    System Response
    Clearing cannot be performed and the document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Exclude the affected item from clearing.
    It may be that this item was not posted with active document splitting. In this case, this item or document would have to be migrated.
    Please can any one help me to resolve the issue.
    Regards
    Bhaskar

    Hi,
    Thanks for your response,
    Please can you send details clearly, how to check the documents are splitted correctly, or not ?
    Best Regards
    Bhaskar

  • FM to change task list status (Tcode IA06)

    Hi all,
    I need a FM to  change the task list status.
    Tcode IA06.. I have got fm to get the status of task list...CP_EX_PLAN_READ..but not able to fine one to change/.
    (Given: Group, Group counter and profile..after this scrrn another screen comes...click the header atb to set the task list status)
    can anyone help me?
    Regards,

    Check this FM - CP_EX_PLAN_READ.
    This gives u all the details .
    CALL FUNCTION 'CP_EX_PLAN_READ'
          EXPORTING
            plnty_imp     = t_mapl-plnty
            plnnr_imp     = t_mapl-plnnr
            plnal_imp     = t_mapl-plnal
            sttag_imp     = t_mapl-aedat
          TABLES
            plko_exp      = t_plko1
            plpo_exp      = t_plpo1
            plmz_exp      = t_plmz1
          EXCEPTIONS
            not_found     = 1
            plnal_initial = 2
            OTHERS        = 3.
    Edited by: Raj on May 27, 2008 10:28 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Opening a PDF to a specific paragraph in a browser?

    I create PDFs of software manuals with Indesign CS4. And I use Acrobat 9 to add features to the PDF. My question is whether it's possible to assign a tag to a piece of text in the PDF's content and then be able to have the PDF open to that tagged tex

  • How to consume an ABAP Enterprise Service in JAVA

    Dear colleagues: I'm kind of confused and need your help. I have already created a Enterpricse Service (for test) in SE80 and configured it through SOAMANAGER. Question1: Here is the WSDL URL I got from SOAMANAGER: http://ldcihri.wdf.sap.corp:50000/s

  • Verify now doesn't work

    Rented last week.  Now cant

  • Concurrency Problem: Does it exist in following situation?

    Hi All Please consider the following problem: There are 100 systems connected through LAN. 99 systems have a tool in local drive that reads and writes certain files at 100th system. As the tool will work in local JVM, and each JVM will try to read &

  • TEMPLATE.fmb: Custom form can't display any system message

    I was using the template.fmb to create a new custom form. It works fine, BUT it can't display any system message such as ""FRM-40400 Transaction complete: 1 record applied and saved" Please advise what's the problem. Thanks