Closing of inbound delivery...

hi all,
we are having problem with our archiving of our inbound delivery. it won't archive documents with header or line items (vbup, vbuk) when not all status = 'C'. we are considering BAPI to update the status manually. can u help us?
regards,
sid

Raja,
You can use the transaction code VL06O. This will give different reports of both inbound and outbound deliveries. For inbound deliveries, It will further give you Deliveries due for Transportation planning,For distribution, For put away, for confirmation,for GR. It can also list all outbound deliveries and inound deliveries.
Edited by: mokirala tilak on Sep 26, 2011 12:44 PM
Edited by: mokirala tilak on Sep 26, 2011 12:54 PM

Similar Messages

Posting goods receipt against Inbound Delivery

Hi,
Our process is creating Purchase order with Confirmation control for Inbound delivery. Then we create a Inbound delivery.
1) After inbound delivery is done we do PGR through VL32N, the system updates the PO history with GR along with the Inbound delivery no. as a reference document against the GR & also the Inbound delivery document flow is updated.
2) But our problem is if we try to do Goods receipt through T-code MIGO against Puchase order or inbound delivery we are not getting reference no. updated in the PO history & also there is no update in the document flow. Also the inbound delivery remais open.
Can you explain why this is happening?
Regards,
Sagar

Hi Sagar,
It is very much possible to do GR using MIGO and document flow will also be updated, you have to do certain config settings for this which is as follows:
in SPRO go to Logistics execution - Shipping - Basic shipping functions - Configure global shipping data - tick document flow update.
Now when you check in Table VBFA you will get the Material Document No. in field VBELN and the status shall aso be updated and inbound delivery will be closed after complete GR.
Hope it solves your problem

Batch Split in Inbound Delivery document

Hello Friends,
In decentralized WM managed scenario, inbound delivery is created automatically when the storage location is HU managed. In the current design, we need to use MIGO/MB1B transaction for replicating stocks into warehouse location, and all the materials are managed.
We have a batch split management to use for distributing the cumulative batches into warehouse. In our testing, transaction MB1B cannot support batch split management however transaction MIGO is closely supporting our need. In the MIGO, we have a distributed quantity functionality and through this we can able to split the quantity into multiple batches.
However, when during inbound delivery generation (Inbound delivery generates in background from MIGO document when location is HU managed), system is generating the individual line item instead batch split, example -
In MIGO -
Total Quantity - 10
Item: 00001
Material : ZZZYYY
Batch1: AAAA
Quantity : 4
Item: 00001
Material : ZZZYYY
Batch2: AAAB
Quantity : 6
In Inbound Delivery -
Item:10
Material : ZZZYYY
Batch1: AAAA
Quantity: 4
Item:20
Material : ZZZYYY
Batch2: AAAB
Quantity : 6
We need as below in inbound delivery -
Item:10
Material : ZZZYYY
item: 90001
Batch1: AAAA
Quantity : 4
item: 90001
Batch2: AAAB
Quantity : 6
Please suggest. Appreciate your reply.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Goutam

use BAPI: BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC
I used this long time back. it worked fine.

Auto Inbound delivery creation

Hi Sapgurus,
I am trying to create Inbound delivery from Outbound delivery after it has been PGI'ed. These both are related to Intracompany STO. We have WM implemented so both of these deliveries result in TO creation and can be closed only after TO confirmations. I used SAP notes which stated to use SPED output type in output determination procedure for outbound delivery and then assign output determination procedure to delivery type. But I was not successful in getting the desired results.
Can anyone please provide me with the steps of this configuration, I may be doing wrong something somewhere.
Appreciate the help.
Thanks in advance
Manav Anand

Hi,
I think you are talking about stock transfer between two plants. I assume your requirement is after PGI of the replenishment delivery system should create automatic inbound delivery in second warehouse,right?
You can create inbound delivery automatically for second warehouse.I had such scenario in my previous client.I believe through some user exit you can initiate inbound delivery creation immediately.
Please check with your technical person.
Regards,
PRashant

How to open a inbound delivery

Sir,
ply tell me how to open a closed inbound delivery which is done through po after puting confirmation in a po.
these is done by "vl31n" i am unable to proceed futher
ply help

Hi,
Could you please describe your problem more exactly?
You are saying that you want to open an inbound delivery, however, you also say you cannot create it in VL31N. So, what is your problem???
Did you eneter a shipping notification for the PO item? What is the error message you get in VL31N when you want to create the inbound delivery?
Does the PO item have PO history? Can you see any GR on PO history tab?
Can you see any inbound delivery number on confirmation tab of the PO item?
Please answer all of my questions.
Thanks,
Csaba

Deleting Open Inbound Delivery

Hi All,
I want to delete the Open Inbound Delivery.
Is there a way to close this inbound delivery.
Issue is : Gr already done but not with VL32N but with MIGO so it remains open in system
Regard
Amey

From an MRP standpoint, the inbound delvy is marked as 'closed' (provided the confirmation control configuration setting has this marked - this comes has default).
Operationally, the inbound delivery is closed therefore has no implication. It is just the part of the 'status' and document flow of the inbound delvy that is not updated and as you may know already that this status/document flow is updated via VL32N receipt or 'shipping parameter at client level' configuration under shipping.
If you just want to delete the IBD regardless then you have to reverse the receipt and make the deletion. But, I'm not sure why would you need to delete the IBD since you can now receipt via VL32N.

Creation of inbound delivery without reference to a PO

Dear gurus,
Let's say that a normal inbound flow is something like this:
PO > Create inbound delivery with reference to PO > inbound shipment > Transfer Order > Confirm Transfer Order > Post Goods Receipt > Putaway
Issue:
My client does not want to create the PO because the PO serves no purpose to them. They want the process to start from inbound delivery.
Question:
1. Can a standalone inbound delivery be created WITHOUT reference to a PO ? If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this standalone inbound delivery.
2. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created automatically with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to trigger the creation of this inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the answer of an inbound delivery creation BAPI to being triggered directly after the creation of the Material Document).
3. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created manually with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this inbound delivery.
Thanks.

Hi Peter,
Actually, my intention is not really to create an inbound delivery based on a goods receipt. Since my client is not keen on the idea of creating a PO, I'm actually trying to provide alternatives and workarounds. From what I have gathered, I already know this much
-> An inbound delivery must be created with reference to PO unless Handling Unit Management is activated. If Handling Unit Management is activated, the creation of a Material Document will trigger the creation of an inbound delivery (I havent tested this out yet). Therefore, a PO will not be necessary in this case.
I was kind of expecting answers along this line, unless of course, something better pops up. Maybe someone out there may know something more.
As for Handling Units, I'm not familiar with it. Hopefully somebody can give me a good configuration guideline on what to do in order to activate it so that I can simulate the scenario of a Material Document triggering the creation of an inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the kind of answers which simply cuts and pastes the SAP HELP URL, 4.6C Handling Unit PDF, Best Practice Document and etc). Hopefully somebody out there can really give me a good guideline on how to do this.
Thanks..

Creation of Inbound delivery mandatory for ASN process in classic scenario?

Dear Experts,
We are going for classic scenario for our green field SRM implementation process. Our client is not using ASN process in their existing MM process. However, they are now looking for an oppurtunity to enable Suppliers to trigger ASN using SUS. In such case, is creation of inbound delivery from Buyer side a mandatory process?
Is the below the process correct?
PO -> ASN (Supplier using SUS) -> Inbound delivery (Optional) -> Goods Receipt (Mandatory) -> Invoicing.
Here, I understand that Goods receipt can be verified against the PO or via Inbound delivery to PO. ASN will inform the store keeper in advance about impending goods receipt and smoothen the confirmation process.
Could you please comment on the above process? Could you please suggest the best practices followed here?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Hey Ranjan!,
You are on track.
The process flow you have shown is true. ASN is available as a standard as part of the MM-SUS process. It makes the buyer aware of any delays in delivery or to make arrangements on shipping docks to receive goods on a said date etc.
Regards,
Nikhil

ASN creation based on ECC inbound delivery

Hi All,
I have a scenario in which we are creating an inbound delivery in ECC and corresponding ASN should be created in supplier system.
In order to achieve this functionality of ECC to supplier system is there any way to map this functionality through any custom development ?
Kindly suggest
Thanks
Gaurav Gupta

Hi,
What I understand from the requirement is - The Supplier dispatches the material to Purchasing company & informs about the same via ASN. This ASN triggers inbound delivery in ECC. When the material reaches the Purchasing Company, GRN is posted with reference to the Inbound Delivery.
Is this correct?
If so, you can achieve this through RFC function, which can be called from vendor ERP system or through Vendor Portal by directly calling the RFC or by using Web Service.
Regards,
Prashant

Error in creation of inbound delivery

hi
When I tried to create inbound delivery against schedule agreement
1) Following warning message is coming when I enter the quantity for each and every line item
u201CAcknowledgment for PO item contains data varianceu201D
2)Following error message is coming when I saved the delivery
u201CTermination during purchase order updateu201D
So I am unable to create the inbound delivery
Note: this error is coming for a particular vendor only

Hi ,
Goto SM13 .
Find the terminations based on user and creation date.
Get the same analysed by ur ABAP team.
Also check the confirmations in PO at Item level.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Inbound Delivery: Inbound WHSCON IDoc with Batch Split - HowTo...?

Hello
We have another tricky problem to solve on our ERP 6.0 system.
My colleagues of Lindt UK create manually inbound deliveries (VL33N) which are replicated to the warehouse (DESADV IDoc -> TRADACOMS.ORDHDR).
When the goods arrive at the warehouse they send back a good receipts message (TRADACOMS.DLCHDR -> WHSCON IDoc).
In some cases we have a batch split because the goods have been put into different storage locations. Example:
- item 10: 200 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0001' (free available for Sale)
- item 10:     5 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0004' (damaged)
I am aware that in the inbound WHSCON item 10 is a main position and the two actual batch split positions are sub-items (900001 & 900002 with HIPOS = '10'). I tried to used E1EDL19-QUALF = 'BAS' (= batch split) with the sub-items but failed so far to update the inbound delivery that I can see the batch split.
I have managed to get one sub-item but not 2 of them. Somehow the system aggregates the quantities for both sub-items into the single item that shows up in the inbound delivery.
When we send the inbound delivery to the warehouse the item looks like this:
- item 10: 200 Cases (no batch yet, Putaway quantity = 0, because these data are coming from the warehouse).
QUESTION: Has anybody else been faced with a similar (if not identical) problem and how did you solve it?
Thanks a lot in advance for your valuable input.
Regards
Uwe

Hello Finbarr
I assume that you do NOT send any (suggested) batches to your warehouse. Otherwise you would have the same problem like we have that the WHSCON cannot overwrite a (suggested) batch.
However, if you just send the quantity per item then the batch split is much simpler than you suggested:
"First E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1519   " <<< first batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
"Second E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1880   " <<< second batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
Well, and as qualifier we use: E1EDL19-QUALF = 'XYZ' " a dummy
The SAP system is smart enough the realize that these two E1EDL24 segment belong to the same item yet have different batches and, therefore, yield a batch split in the delivery. The system generated the 9xxxxx numbers for this sub-item lines automatically.
Although I believe that it is not possible to change a batch in the delivery using an inbound WHSCON I would appreciate to have a final proof of this assumption. I could imagine that if you first delete the item containing the suggested batch and then add a new item with the actual batch from the warehouse it might works. However, this would require to implement a user-exit which I do not prefer.
Regards
Uwe
PS: It seems I gave an answer to the wrong question (should be EDI (DESADV): Can batches be overwritten by an inbound WHSCON (pick conf)? )

Reg: How to capture the Excise Invoice with respect to Inbound delivery

Hi All,
Please give the process follow for capturing the excise invoice with respect to inbound delivery.
Thanks & Regards
Siva

Hi Siva,
Please check this link
CIN with Example..?
Regards,
Bijoy Kumar

SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"

Hello Friends ,
After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
- Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
also another error like
- Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound indicator at the shipping parameter at client level customization
i need help on how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situation

Hi,
The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note: 1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT

Problem with HU during creation of Inbound Delivery using IDoc

Hi,
When I am creating Delivery manually and perform Packing, Handling Unit information is stored in VEKP and VEPO tables.
But when I am processing through IDoc, after passing data to Handling Unit Segments E1EDL37 (Handling unit header), E1EDL39 (Control Segment for Handling Units), E1EDL44 (IDoc: Handling Unit Item - Delivery), It is creating delivery successfully but Handling Unit information is not getting stored in VEKP, VEPO tables.
Tried most of the notes 912470, 678464, 682506 and all of them say "<i>You use the Idoc DESADV to create inbound delivery with packing data. The delivery is created, Idoc gets status 52 but the Handling Units (HUs) are missing. This is due to a program error. In case the IDoc contains segments to create HUs (E1EDL37), the IDoc processing should end in error status (51) as long as no packing data could be created</i>.".
Need your advice whether we have to maintain any customizing for this or how to proceed with it.
Thanks in advance,
Murali.

IDocs and BAPIs sometimes behave differently than transactions. You might need to add a user exit specifically for IDoc processing. Otherwise send a message to SAP and have them look at it.

Purchase order and Inbound delivery

Hi gurus,
Im trying to create an inbound delivery with reference to purchase order. In the configuration i've created a new delivery type similar to EL and said Yes to all the copy controls that system asks. When im creating the inbound delivery with reference to the PO it is picking up the standard EL delivery type instead of the one that i created. What did i miss here? I want the inbound delivery type that i created be the default inbound delivery type for that particular order type.. pls suggest
cheers
Joseph

Hi Joseph,
Just check whether the newly created delivery type is assigned to the Confirmation Category LA under the below path:
SproMaterials ManagementPurchasingConfirmationsDefine Internal Confirmation Categories
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Closing of inbound delivery...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for