"Closing" Unused, but Released Orders with Inspection Lots

We have Process Orders which have been released, but been unused.  When We come to Financially Close them we have problems as the Inspection lot is still on without a UD
Is there a way we can mass process UD of Inspection Lots (or deletion of IL) with Nothing Produced on the Order?
Thanks & Regards,
Vivek Kumar

hi,
if you the process orders, make a list of those. now in qa16, you can do the mass UD.  in that transaction, you can find out an option called " dynamic selection". if you expand that option, you will have an option called " production"; under that order. So you can put all those process orders and with the lot oringin 03, you will ge tp know the concerned inspection lots. then you do mass ud. this was your requirement.
Partha

Similar Messages

  • Production Order Qty- Inspection Lot Qty

    Hi Guru's,
    When an  production order is relreased an inspection lot is creaetd with the production Qty. But later when we change Qty for  the released Prodction Order the inspection lot  Qty is not changes it remains the same as previous Order Qty.
    Say for Ex: intial Prod  order qty (MTS Scenario) is 200 (production order released). Inspection lot Qty is 200.
    Later  User changes the Qty to  100. Our problem is the inspection lot qty  does not change ramins the same as 200. Can inspection lot qty be changed automically on change of production order qty .
    What settings need to change? pls advise
    Regards,
    Sankaran
    Edited by: Sankaran M on Oct 10, 2008 9:41 AM

    Hi Sankaran,
    It is possible if the user not doing any result against existing lot.
    Follow the Below step.
    Your Existing order Qty = 200 Nos Inspection lot no 300000200.
    Now you want change the Qty as 200 to 100.
    Before change the qty, first you have to delete the Inspection lot Go to CO02 -> Got to menu Functions -> Inspection lot -> Delete.
    Now change the Qty 100.
    And Again go to Functions -> Inspection Lot -> Create. and save the order.
    Now system will delete the Old indpection lot and create the new inspection lot.
    Qty : 100 Inspection Lot 300000201.
    Revert further clarification.
    Regards,
    S.Babusingh

  • Creation of Release order with reference to Contract

    Dear experts,
    We are doing upgradation from 4.6B to ECC6. During testing ,while creating release order with reference to contract,(Contract was created with Account assignment category-K and item category-D),cost center is copied from contract in purchase order in account assignment tab of item details,
    but when i save it window is poping up(account assignment service line item 10-small window) asking to enter cost center again. Even if i enter the same cost center in that window,cost center field,again it is asking same window is poping up for entering cost center.
    Can any body please tell me inspite of cost center is copied,why this window is coming ,please suggest.This problem is not there in 4.6B version
    Advance thanks,
    Regards,
    Dayanand

    Please check to OXK1, and compare it to both system.Or check the config guide in IMGMM-Purchasingacc.assigment--Set subscreen for acc assingment (coding) block.

  • Reverse a Return Delivery with inspection lot posted (QM)

    Hello experts,
    I want to reverse with transaction VL09 a good movement of a return client delivery with inspection lot. I posted the inspection lot and transferred the material to Unrestricted use (transaction QA11).
    Then I began the cancel Return Process and I transferred the material to Quality (movement type 322) to run VL09 with material in Quality stock, but the system displays  the following error message:
    You cannot cancel GR, since inspection lot is already partly posted
    Message no. QA046
    Diagnosis
    You are attempting to reverse a goods receipt although quantity postings have already been made from the inspection lot. This means that stock for the goods receipt has already been transferred and, for this reason, a cancelation of the document is no longer possible.
    Procedure
    Ensure that the postings in QM (within the usage decision transactions) are carried out.
    Please let me know what can I do to reverse the return delivery.
    Thanks in advance.
    Pablo

    You are trying to do the process which you ahve already transferred through Transaction QA11.
    The role of Cancel return Process has already been done by this transaction as the Stock has already been into Un- restricted.
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

  • Line item is rejected in the contract but release order is created.

    Dear all,
    as i mentioned that the line item is rejected in the contract so it should not allow to create the release prder or any further process but then also it is allowing to create release order.
    please help is resolving the issue
    is it a product related bug or functional error
    please help me in rectifying the error.
    Regards
    Subrat

    Hi
    Suppose in a contract if you reject a line item by assigning reason of rejection then when you create a release order with reference to that contract that particular item will not get copied and you will get a log in the release order with regard to that
    Suppose in that release order if an user manually  enters the rejected item some qty
    If this is what you are asking
    The ans is system will accept and in no way you can stop it or control it in std SAP
    You need to develop some user exit for that
    I think it is functional error
    This scenario was tested by me
    Regards
    Raja
    Edited by: ramanathan raja on Oct 4, 2008 1:15 AM

  • QM Manual Inspection Lot - with Inspection lot origin 89

    Hi QM Guru,
    I did maintain inspection type 10 in this material but while i would like to create the inspection lot manually.
    I try to create manual inspection lot manually , i encounter this error with Inspection lot origin 89.
    No valid inspection type for material 10000037 was found or selected
    Message no. QA280
    Diagnosis
    An active inspection type for the material 1XXXXXXX in plant XXXX could not be found for the specified origin 89 or none of the available inspection types was selected.
    System Response
    Inspection lots cannot be created.
    Procedure
    Check the inspection type setting in the material master.
    Is there anything which i missing ?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    I hope you have got the answer for this query. You get this error because you are trying to create a manual inspection lot (origin 89) of a material for which Inspection type 89 is not activated.
    From your statement,
    I did maintain inspection type 10 in this material but while i would like to create the inspection lot manually.
    I try to create manual inspection lot manually , i encounter this error with Inspection lot origin 89.
    It is clearly stated that you are using different inspection types. As Rama has suggested, activate Inspection type 89 in the material master and make corresponding master data.
    Other than that, you cannot create manual inspection lot for the origins 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14. Similarly, Automatic inspection lots cannot be created for origins 07, 15 & 89. This answers your further query raised in the thread.
    ntn

  • Goods movement with Inspection Lot

    Hi
    We would like to do a Material to Material posting including the earlier created inspection lots for the initial material?
    Is it possible in QM to transfer /link an inspection lot with batch from one material to another material?
    Ex: one material has inspection stock with assigned inspection lot/batch. we would like transfer posting this stock to other material. Is it possible by transfer the inspection lot from one material to other material with inspection lot/Batch?

    Hi,
    We can trasfer the stcok from one material to another material from Quality lot itself , but we cannot assign one lot to two materials. If you want inspection lot in receiving plant then activate 08 inspection type in Material Master and maintain inspection settings for 331 M.Type in SPRO.
    Regards,
    Vikas.

  • Weighted from quality score of chars. with Inspection Lots

    Dear QM Guru's.
    My question is about Quality Score with Inspection Lots.
    The Scenario:
    1. In a Quality master View in Material Master I use  the option number 05 of The Q-Score Procedure (Weighted from quality score of chars.)
    2. I use Inspection Points.
    3. I have 10 Inspection Points in a Characteristic.
    4. When I make the Usage desicion,  the Quality Score takes the last Inspeciton point.
    The questions:
    1. Why the  Quality Score  does take the last Inspection points, ?
    2. Is there a chance The Quality Score taking the average of all inspection points ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Federico

    This procedure calculates the quality score as the weighted average of the characteristic scores.
    The score for the characteristic is determined on the basis of the defect class score for the characteristic result. You define the weight of the characteristic in the inspection plan.
                                          Sum ( E_KQD(characteristic) * WEIGHT )
               E_KQD =                 ___________________________
                                                     Sum ( WEIGHT )
    With E_KQD (charac.):       Score for characteristic defect class.
                                  If the defect class is blank or zero,
                                 the result corresponds to the maximum
                                 allowed score.
         WEIGHTING:      Weight of characteristic according to
                                 inspection plan.
    Now
    As I understand It is Maximum allowed score which you have defined or the Avg one.
    If you want to have the Avg of all inspection points then Copy & modify  the function module   KQD_COPY_REFERENCE_FORM  ( originally KQD_FEATURE_CLASS_WEIGHTED )

  • Process Order Close with Inspection Lots

    At month end we need to close process orders that have not had their usage decison made, generally the inprocess inspection UD.  Is there any way to close these POs without having to enter a usage decision?

    > Hi
    > You can activate the inspection completed status
    > activated for the inspection lots with out making
    > UD.
    > Regards'
    > YMREDDY
    Your suggested solution to being able to flag the inprocess inspection lot as being completed without making a UD, to allow the process order to be closed, sounded very, very interesting, but we are not familiar with the file/record/configuration parameter you noted.  Is there any way that you might be able to clarify your answer, so that we can have our technical team figure out how to implement that change?
    Thank you very much.....this has had us stymied since we went live.

  • Cancel 101 movement with Inspection lot of closed financial period

    Hi experts,
    we are having the following problem.
    We have a 101 movement with creation of Inspection lot, which was done in a finance period which is already closed.
    Now I have to cancel this movement, but I get the error M7021 with VOR, which means that I am not allowed to cancel it, because of the period is already closed.
    But we also can not open the period.
    Which possibilities do I have?
    Maybe MI10 movement?
    Kind regards

    Hello Jürgen,
    thank you for your help.
    I am confused now.
    Becasue normally I am logged on in german and now I did check the english one.
    Deficit of BA St. in QI prev. 127 M2 : "material number" 0001 "sloc" "batch"
    But here I get QI prev, but in the F1 help there is no QI or prev.
    In german I get VOR and there in the F1 help it is written, that VOR is previous period (so I think equal to PR in english).
    Now I am a bit confused.
    But anyway, the thing is that we have to empty the stock.
    Kind regards for every help, I think there is no possibility to cancel that booking as the period is closed.
    @ Biju K, to be honest your way would really be the only correct way, but at the current situation it is a bit special.
    I will do a MI10 booking.

  • Automatic WM transfer order during inspection lot posting to non-WM-sloc

    Hi All,
    I have a question in regards of automatic creation of WM-transfer orders during QM-inspection lot posting from a WM-storage location to a non-WM-storage location:
    - MIGO IM-posting: goods receipt with reference to purchase order to a WM-storage location
    => inspection lot automatically created
    => WM-stock is located on 902 GR area external rcpts / stock category Q
    - Inspection lot: enter result and usage decision with posting of inspection lot stock to a non-WM storage location into the blocked stock
    A transfer requirement (movement type 311 / destination u201C921 Transferu201D) is created after the inspection lot posting (QA11) but the auto-creation functionality is not possible since the u201CSystem cannot find source storage binu201D.
    How can this auto-creation of a transfer order be realized since it is possible to create the transfer order manually via LB11 (entering source u201C902u201D / storage bin u201CPurchase Order no.u201D)?
    The system cannot find the storage bin automatically.
    Thank you in advance!

    Hello,
    I do not understand your scenario , u are saying are posting inspection lot to non WM storage location and again saying system can not find bin automatically.
    "A transfer requirement (movement type 311 / destination u201C921 Transferu201D) is created after the inspection lot posting (QA11) but the auto-creation functionality is not possible since the u201CSystem cannot find source storage binu201D.
    How can this auto-creation of a transfer order be realized since it is possible to create the transfer order manually via LB11 (entering source u201C902u201D / storage bin u201CPurchase Order no.u201D)?
    The system cannot find the storage bin automatically.
    Thank you in advance!"
    Please let me know are u using quality interim storage area. If you clear material from quality and want material to go to bin then it should be warehouse managed storage location. 
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Problem in mapping MIC with Inspection Lot

    Dear All,
                        I have two problems I am making the form for Equipment Inspection but not able to find how should I map the Testing equipment and MIC with the inspection lot I mean from which table they are coming or is their any Standard function for that.
    Thanks in Advance
    Sachin Gautam

    hi,
    check these tables for <b>results</b> entered through lot
    QAKL
    QAMR
    QASE
    QASR
    if they have used <b>inspection points</b> check this table QAPP
    for i<b>nspectionlot</b> check table QALS
    hope this helps !!!
    Cheers
    Alfred

  • PROBLEMS CANCELING MOVEMENTS WITH INSPECTION LOT

    We have this situation:
    We need to reset the GD returns but this GD returns was posted by QM and when we try to cancel in VL09 we meet the next message Message no. QA046.
    So we tried to cancel in other ways with the inspection lot and the usage decision but it has not been possible to restore movement.
    We found the note 175842 and we have implemented the program RQEVAC50 but, when we useit we meet the message M7226
    We checked the movement Z55 and its opposite Z56. I suppose its standard movement is the 651 and 652 and I compared the customizing of them. They can be similar it just the movement Z55 and Z56 are prepared to be posted by QM and special stock E and Q.
    The movement that we need to reset with the program RQEVAC50 is:
    We have tried to use the program for a movement 101 and it worked well (5000795975).
    We tried to test with a return delivery with Z55 movement in another environment and the program worked correctly so we think the customizing of the movement Z55 is correct.
    We think the problem is when the usage decision creates some movements or we use some of the next fields in the usage decision:
    In our case the movements are 321 and Z56.
    But when the movements are the standards 321 and 553 program doesn’t work because we meet the next message again M7096
    Program doesn’t work because we meet the next message again:
    What can we do? could you check thi situation and tell us anything, please?
    Kind regards

    hi,
    check these tables for <b>results</b> entered through lot
    QAKL
    QAMR
    QASE
    QASR
    if they have used <b>inspection points</b> check this table QAPP
    for i<b>nspectionlot</b> check table QALS
    hope this helps !!!
    Cheers
    Alfred

  • Release of the Inspection lot

    Hi All,
    Need to release the inspection lot.
    The material stock  in warehouse is in Blocked stock category, need to post the stock to quality stock in order to release the inpection lot??
    Even if the stock is in blocked category by assignig the task/ specification list to the material & saving, can i release the lot???
    How to overcome the issue??
    Regards,
    Mallika

    Hi,
    Need to release the inspection lot.
    Give UD and close it.
    need to post the stock to quality stock in order to release the inpection lot??
    Why do you need to do that? As Anand said, use 343 to post this quantity to UR.
    And there is one question as well,
    Did you release the quantity from QI to Block stock lot before using this inspection lot?
    ntn

  • Authorized Partners for Release Orders with customer hierarchy

    Hello everyone,
          I have created a value contract with order type WK1, in the order type WK1 configuration, choose rule B  for check partner auth. field, namely we want to use
    customer hierarchy to detemine the sold-to-party for the follow-up release order. Also I have created the customer hierarchy with hierarchy type A. There are
    four levels under this hierarchy, it contains four customer nodes and four customers. Every customer is belong to a customer node. The partner determination
    for the customer hierarchy have alredy done, I can see the customer hierarchy "1D" at the partner tab of header in the contract, but when I release the sales
    order against  the contract, input a low-level customer number, still got the message "partner X is not authorized to release from contracts.".
         I want to know if I missed some settings in order type configuration or the copy control from WK1 to OR. If this scenario need integrate with  CRM system?  I
    have found some related information, just list below:
        Partners in the hierarchy (Rule B)
    If the partner who wants to release against the contract is the sold-to party of the contract or at a lower level in customer hierarchy to the sold-to party in the contract, the system accepts the partner as the sold-to party for the release order.
    If rule B is defined for the contract type, you can search for authorized partners for a release order using the contract number. Equally, you can search for the relevant contract for a release order using the partner number. In this case, the partner authorization rule is irrelevant.
    Prerequisites
    If you wish to use group hierarchies other than pricing hierarchies to determine authorized partners, you must have created a hierarchy category and a hierarchy:
    To create the hierarchy category, go to Customizing for CRM under Master Data --> Business Partner-->  Business Partner Group Hierarchy. 
    To create the group hierarchy, go to the SAP Easy Access Menu and choose Master Data --> Business Partners --> Maintain Group Hierarchy.
    Note that you can only create group hierarchies in the SAP GUI and not in the People-Centric user interface.
    You must have activated the necessary settings for the sales contract and the release order in the IMG for CRM. For more information, see Transactions ---> Settings for Contracts -->Define Settings for Authorized Partners.
      Thanks!

    Hi,
    In transcation VTAA at item level have your own cory requirment code which will calcullate net value of the doc, hope this works out
    regards
    sriky

Maybe you are looking for