Cluster Configuration in WebLogic 10.3.5

I have some doubts about clustering in WebLogic.
1) I have created two MS(Managed Servers) in one machine: MS1(port 7003),MS2(port 7013). The MS2 should be the backup for MS1 when something wrong happens. So MS1 and MS2 have to be agreggated to my cluster configuration or just MS2?
2) I have created the cluster ,with the Admin Console, assuming I have to agregate just MS2. ¿Do I need to do another configuration? I don't know exactly what are the steps to complete the cluster.

Hi,
You are going in the right track.
First make sure that you have a standalone server,in your case (AdminServer) to distribute the requests to the other Managed servers.
1)Create the two managed servers.
2)Add all the servers in the cluster
3)create a machine and add MS1 and MS2.
4)Run the node manager from the directory <oracle_home>/wlserver10.3/server/bin/nodemanager.cmd
5)Now try to start the managed servers.
optionally...add the below argument in the managed servers... Home >Summary of Servers >Summary of Clusters >Cluster_1 >ms1
-Xms512m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
Clustering achieved-
But wait, now this is not the end of things... :)
Now you need to achieve Load balancing, to actually see how the clustering behaves.
cheers,
salil

Similar Messages

Snmp configuration on weblogic 10 has no effect

SNMP in MMC(Mobile Management Center, A HP Product), use joesnmp.jar internal to send snmp trap generated by mmc app. This part works well in weblogic 10;
snmp in weblogic , configured by weblogic console. In weblogic 8, we configure such items:
Weblogic Subsystem
Purpose
Level
Deployer
Monitor all war/ear deploy/undeploy/redeploy
INFO
JDBC
Monitor all warnings/errors in jdbc operation
WARN
Current tests shows that the snmp configuration on weblogic 10 has no effect.
Due to MMC4.6 gets the Weblogic updated from 8.16 to 10.3, we didn’t find the configuration about “Enable JDBC Logging”. Below is the former config page about Weblogic 8.16.
But in Weblogic 10.3 we cannot find this configuration. We have followed the guide http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs100/jdbc_admin/monitor.html#wp1048793
And tried to set the appropriate properties on the command line like this,
-Dweblogic.debug.DebugJDBCSQL=true -Dweblogic.log.StdoutSeverity="Info"
Actually we can get the DM, Core, SMTP, Bulk, Adaptor Class, and connection fail error messages in weblogic backend log, but seems Weblogic cannot send SNMP trap messages to SNMP monitoring tool like Openview.
PS. Weblogic can send out the SNMP trap messages when the server starts and stops.
So till now the SNMP cannot monitor the DM, Core, SMTP, Bulk, Adaptor Class, and connection fail for MMC4.6.

Hi, I am on 12.1 weblogic, and I am stuck on where you set the SNMP Servername and port number.
We are on windows 2008, I see there is a services, SNMP .
Is there something I need to do on the weblogic side before i get into the SNMP agenets and traps, this part I understand, I am just unsure where to add the SNMP Servername and the user I wish the emails to go to.
I see in the security realms the user i can add to the group monitors.
-->, I am running WL 10.3 and SNMP works fine. The cluster generates traps based on particular mbeans, such as when a server's health state is not "OK", or when there are JDBC connection issues. You have to create a new SNMP agent within the admin server then build the individual traps ( String, Gauge, Counter, etc. ) and make sure you have a Trap Destination.

Cluster/load balance weblogic using L4 switch like Alteon

Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more server and
          cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like Alteon Layer4
          switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to maintain a single copy
          of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among servers)?
          BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use a Layer 4
          switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the application server
          layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a single server
          (it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers or 20 weblogic
          servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable, sacalable and fast.
          I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers need to
          share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this approach will
          fail.


So My understanding is:
          Alteon with WL 6.0 can do load balancing for:
          entity bean
          stateless session bean
          but can't do load balancing for:
          stateful session bean (will persistent/sticky binding solve part of the
          problem except fail-over)
          in-memory replication
          am I right?
          Pao Wan
          "Don Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]...
          > It is possible to configure Alteon to understand the WebLogic 6.0 cookie
          format
          > and have a proxy-less cluster configuration that performs load balancing
          and
          > fail over of session state.
          >
          > It is also possible to configure Alteon's hardware-based SSL decryption
          for really
          > fast HTTPS processing.
          >
          > We are working on a white paper that describes how to configure Alteon for
          use
          > with WebLogic Server 6.0.
          >
          > -Don
          >
          >
          > Robert Patrick wrote:
          >
          > > Cameron,
          > >
          > > I believe that BEA tested their new proxy-less web clustering solution
          with
          > > load-balancing products from Alteon and several other vendors
          (Arrowpoint ?--
          > > which is now Cisco). However, it was my understanding that these
          products do
          > > not understand how to decrypt our cookies and extract IP addresses but
          rather
          > > these products are capable of doing sticky load balancing based on the
          Session
          > > ID contained in our cookie.
          > >
          > > If this is correct, then what this means is that when the primary server
          fails,
          > > the request will be routed to "some other server" in the cluster but not
          > > necessarily the one that holds the secondary copy of the user's session.
          The
          > > change in WLS 6.0 is that WLS will accept these misdirected requests and
          it will
          > > go out to the correct server and "migrate" the session to the server
          that
          > > received the request making that server the new primary (and
          regenerating the
          > > Session ID).
          > >
          > > I am sure if this is wrong that our product manager or one of our
          engineers will
          > > correct me (please?)...
          > >
          > > Hope this helps,
          > > Robert
          > >
          > > Cameron Purdy wrote:
          > >
          > > > Hi Robert,
          > > >
          > > > FWIW - There are several vendors (Primeon? Arrowpoint?) who claim to
          > > > understand WL cookies and parse the IPs out. (I haven't verified it
          myself
          > > > though.)
          > > >
          > > > --
          > > > Cameron Purdy
          > > > Tangosol, Inc.
          > > > http://www.tangosol.com
          > > > +1.617.623.5782
          > > > WebLogic Consulting Available
          > > >
          > > > "Robert Patrick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          > > > news:[email protected]...
          > > > > There are not any hardware vendors (yet) that can understand
          WebLogic's
          > > > session
          > > > > ID. While you might be able to use the load balancer without the
          proxy on
          > > > 5.1,
          > > > > you would not be able to take advantage of in-memory replication
          failover
          > > > unless
          > > > > you only had two machines in the cluster. Like you said, everything
          will
          > > > work
          > > > > with 6.0 regardless of how the load balancer works (though you
          really,
          > > > really
          > > > > want to minimize the number of times the requests come into the
          wrong
          > > > server by
          > > > > utilizing sticky load balancing).
          > > > >
          > > > > Hope this helps,
          > > > > Robert
          > > > >
          > > > > Cameron Purdy wrote:
          > > > >
          > > > > > Rajesh,
          > > > > >
          > > > > > I meant that it would work in lieu of a proxy (such as Apache or
          NES)
          > > > with
          > > > > > 5.1, but only if both the hw load balancer and WL were set up to
          use
          > > > > > cookies. Some hw load balancers rely on IP and that doesn't
          work -- AOL
          > > > > > connections for example can change the source IP on the fly.
          Others
          > > > produce
          > > > > > their own cookies, that will work. Some even can use WL cookies
          and
          > > > parse
          > > > > > them to determine where to go. According to what I've read, with
          6.0 if
          > > > the
          > > > > > WL primary dies or for some other reason the request shows up at
          the
          > > > "wrong"
          > > > > > server, it will be handled correctly. That means you are pretty
          safe
          > > > with
          > > > > > hw load balancers and 6.0, almost regardless of the sticky
          > > > implementation
          > > > > > that they use.
          > > > > >
          > > > > > --
          > > > > > Cameron Purdy
          > > > > > Tangosol, Inc.
          > > > > > http://www.tangosol.com
          > > > > > +1.617.623.5782
          > > > > > WebLogic Consulting Available
          > > > > >
          > > > > > "Rajesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          > > > > > news:[email protected]...
          > > > > > >
          > > > > > > Hi Cameron,
          > > > > > > Can you elaborate on how it would work with WL5.1 since no in
          memory
          > > > > > replication
          > > > > > > would happen if the servers are standalone.
          > > > > > >
          > > > > > > "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
          > > > > > > >Yes, this will work fine with WL6. (WL5.1 will work fine as
          long as
          > > > > > cookies
          > > > > > > >are used by the load balancer.)
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >--
          > > > > > > >Cameron Purdy
          > > > > > > >Tangosol, Inc.
          > > > > > > >http://www.tangosol.com
          > > > > > > >+1.617.623.5782
          > > > > > > >WebLogic Consulting Available
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >"paowan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          > > > > > > >news:[email protected]...
          > > > > > > >> Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more
          server
          > > > and
          > > > > > > >> cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like
          Alteon
          > > > > > Layer4
          > > > > > > >> switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to
          maintain a
          > > > single
          > > > > > > >copy
          > > > > > > >> of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among
          servers)?
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >> BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use
          a
          > > > Layer
          > > > > > > >4
          > > > > > > >> switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the
          application
          > > > > > server
          > > > > > > >> layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a
          single
          > > > > > server
          > > > > > > >> (it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers
          or 20
          > > > > > weblogic
          > > > > > > >> servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable,
          sacalable
          > > > and
          > > > > > > >fast.
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >> I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers
          need to
          > > > > > > >> share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this
          > > > approach
          > > > > > will
          > > > > > > >> fail.
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > >
          > > > >
          >

How can I list all the domains configured for Weblogic Servers?

How can I list all the domains configured for Weblogic Servers?
I saw a note, which says the following:
"WebLogic Server does not support multi-domain interaction using either the Administration Console, the weblogic.Admin utility, or WebLogic Ant tasks. This restriction does not, however, explicitly preclude a user written Java application from accessing multiple domains simultaneously."
In my case, I just want to list all the domains, is that possible by using any scripts?
Thanks
AJ

If you use WLS Node Manager and the Config Wizard was used to create the domains, then the list of domains should be in a location like this:
<MIDDLEWARE_HOME>\wlserver_10.3\common\nodemanager\nodemanager.domains
Enterprise Manager Grid Control also has support for multi-domain management of WLS in a console.

Live migration to HA failed leaving VHD on local storage and VM in cluster = Unsupported Cluster Configuration

Hi all
Fun one here, I've been moving non-HA VMs to a HA and everything has been working perfectly until now. All this is being performed on Hyper-V 2012R2, Windows Server 2012R2 and VMM 2012R2.
For some reason on the VMs failed the migration with an error 10608 "Cannot create or update a highly available virtual machine because Virtual Machine Manager could not locate or access Drive:\Folder" The odd thing is the drive\folder is
a local storage one and I selected a CSV in the migration wizard.
The net result is that the VM is half configured into the cluster but the VHD is still on local storage. Hence the "unsupported cluster configuration" error.
The question is how do I roll back? I either need to get the VM out of the cluster and back into a non-HA state or move the VHD onto the CSV. Not sure if the latter is really a option.
I've foolishly clicked "Ignore" on the repair so now I can't use the "undo" option (brain fade moment on my part).
Any help gratefully received as I'm a bit stuck with this.
Thanks
Rob

Hi Simar
Thanks for the advice, I've now got the VM back in a stable state and running HA.
Just to finish off the thread for future I did the following
- Shutdown the VM
- Remove the VM from the Failover Cluster Manager (as you say this did leave the VM configuration intact)
- I was unable to import the VM as per your instructions so I copied the VHD to another folder on the local storage and took a note of the VM configuration.
- Deleted the VM from VMM so this removed all the configuration details/old VHD.
- Built a new VM using the details I saved from the point above
- Copied the VHD into the new VMs folder and attached it to the VM.
- Started it up and reconfigured networking
- Use VMM to make the VM HA.
I believe I have found the reason for the initial error, it appears there was a empty folder in the Snapshot folder, probably from an old Checkpoint that hadn't cleaned up properly when it was deleted.
The system is up and running now so thanks again for the advice.
Rob

Examples.cluster.rmi for WebLogic Server 11g

How can I get package examples.cluster.rmi for WebLogic Server 11g?
I would like to perform a similiar test like the following:
https://freepaper.taichung.gov.tw/examplesWebApp/examples/src/examples/cluster/rmi/package-summary.html
Thanks a lot

Hi,
I have just now installed WLS via the net installer, and the default examples server password of welcome1 does indeed work for me.
However, I note from your post that you are using port 7101, not 7001. Could that be the issue?
http://localhost:7101/console/login/LoginForm.jspKevin

Hyper-V Failover Cluster Configuration Confirmation

Dear All,
I have created a Hyper-V Failover Cluster and I want you to confirm if the configuration I have done is okay and I have not missed
out anything that is mandatory for a Hyper-V Failover Cluster to work. My configuration is below:
1. Presented Disks to servers, formatted and taken offline
2. Installed necessary features, such as failover clustering
3. Configured NIC Teaming
4. Created cluster, not adding storage at the time of creation
- Added disks to the cluster
- Added disks as CSV
- Renamed disks to represent respective CSV volumes
- Assigning each node a CSV volume
- Configured quorum automatically which configured the disk witness
- There were two networks so renamed them to Management and Cluster Communication
- Exposed Management Network to Cluster and Clients
- Exposed Cluster Communication Network to Cluster only
5. Installed Hyper-V
- Changed Virtual Disks, Configuration and Snapshots Location
- Assigned one CSV volume to each node
- Configured External switch with allow management option checked
1. For minimum configuration, is this enough?
2. If I create a virtual machine and make it highly available from hyper-v console, would it be highly available and would live
migrate, etc.?
3. Are there any configuration changes required?
4. Please, suggest how it can be made better?
Thanks in advan

Hi ,
Please refer to following steps to build a hyper-v failover cluster :
Step 1: Connect both physical computers to the networks and storage
Step 2: Install Hyper-V and Failover Clustering on both physical computers
Step 3: Create a virtual switch
Step 4: Validate the cluster configuration
Step 5: Create the cluster
Step 6: Add a disk as CSV to store virtual machine data
Step 7: Create a highly available virtual machine
Step 8: Install the guest operating system on the virtual machine
Step 9: Test a planned failover
Step 10: Test an unplanned failover
Step 11: Modify the settings of a virtual machine
Step 12: Remove a virtual machine from a cluster
For details please refer to following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us//library/jj863389.aspx
Hope it helps
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

HFM Cluster configuration is failing in distributed environment

Hi Gurus,
I am configuring HFM 11.1.2 on windows 2008 server with sql server 2005.This is a distributed installation.
Server 1:
Financial Management Server
Server 2:
Financial Management Web Services Web Application
Financial Management Web Services IIS Web Application
Financial Management Smart View IIS Web Application
Financial Management IIS Web Application
Financial Management LCM IIS Web Application
Server 3: SQL Server 2005
on server 1 i am able to configure the hfm but when i tried cluster configuration from server 2 then its failing and giving the error "Tue Sep 14 05:43:13 2010) Failed to register cluster: Access is denied. Line:3809 File: .\CEPMWindowsConfig.cpp Error code:0x80070005 Error: Access is denied.
(Tue Sep 14 05:43:13 2010) Failed to register cluster containing server adc6140810: IDispatch error #1553"
can you help me to ressolve this issue.
Thanks
Krishna

Hello Krishna,
Any luck fixing this issue? I am experiencing the same issue. Please advise, thank you.

Cross-WAN Cluster Configuration in JMQ

Hi MQ experts,
Here I have some questions regarding the JMQ cluster configuration
with regard to the cross WAN support. Let say there are two JMQ
brokers located in two different geo locations (e.g. one in NY and the
other in SF) configured to participating in the same JMQ cluster, and
several JMQ clients are configured to talk to their local JMQ broker in
either site.
Given the above configuration, here are my questions:
* Does this configuration work from the functionality point of view?
* What is the protocol/mechanism used for the inter-broker communication?
* Does this configuration (cross WAN) work from the performance's point of view? If so, is there s is any specific configuration that needs to be done (for instance, we heard if HTTP is being used for the data synchronization between these two brokers across the WAN then it's possible, etc.)?
* For the clients on each site, if the home broker fails, then does the failover mechanism work well in this cross-WAN configuration?
* If this is indeed a supported configuration, is there any other documentation/performance benchmark reporting from which we can get more information?
Thanks in advance for any information that you can share with us.
-Alan

hi alan,
1) yes it will work functionally
2) dont know exactly but i think there are several
3) what will you use about openmq? what are the charackteristics for your usage? queues/topics temp queues .... lots of things to ask.
4) it will work
5) i think it is not supported since WAN capabilities are just in development and are planned for the next releases.
regards chris

Do i have to do something configuration in weblogic 6.1 to put a javabean?

Hi,
I'm trying to do a simple example about a simple javabean....but it...is giving to my some errors....my question is:
Do i have to do something configuration in weblogic 6.1 to put a simple javabean?...
i have created a web application called mywebapp, I have created \WEB-INF\classes directory�there I have put my simpleBean.class��my jsp is in the root of \mywebapp directory�.
I am using weblogic 6.1�..jdk 1.3��.Somebody could help me or give me some suggestions or ideas?�..
Thanks in advance�
Mary

<html>
<head>
<title>Hello</title>
</head>
<body>
<basefont face="Arial">
<jsp:useBean id="simpleBean" scope="page" class="simpleBean" />

<jsp:setProperty name="simpleBean" property="fname" value="Andrew"/>
<jsp:setProperty name="simpleBean" property="lname" value="Patzer"/>

<center>
<b><%= simpleBean.welcomeMsg() %></b>
</center>
</body>
</html>
public class simpleBean implements java.io.Serializable {
/* Member Variables */
private String lname;
private String fname;
public simpleBean() {
/* Initialize bean properties */
setLname("");
setFname("");
/* Accessor Methods */
public String getLname() {
return lname;
public void setLname(String _lname) {
lname = _lname;
public String getFname() {
return fname;
public void setFname(String _fname) {
fname = _fname;
/* Display personalized message */
public String welcomeMsg() {
return "Hello " + fname + " " + lname +
", welcome to the wonderful world of JavaBeans!";
////////////////errors
Full compiler error(s):
/apps/wclust1/bea/wlserver6.1/config/domadmin/applications/mywebapp/WEB-INF/_tmp_war_srvadmin_srvadmin_mywebapp/jsp_servlet/__hello.java:87: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class simpleBean
location: class jsp_servlet.__hello
simpleBean simpleBean = null; //[ /hello.jsp; Line: 12]
^
/apps/wclust1/bea/wlserver6.1/config/domadmin/applications/mywebapp/WEB-INF/_tmp_war_srvadmin_srvadmin_mywebapp/jsp_servlet/__hello.java:88: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class simpleBean
location: class jsp_servlet.__hello
simpleBean = (simpleBean)pageContext.getAttribute("simpleBean"); //[ /hello.jsp; Line: 12]
^
/apps/wclust1/bea/wlserver6.1/config/domadmin/applications/mywebapp/WEB-INF/_tmp_war_srvadmin_srvadmin_mywebapp/jsp_servlet/__hello.java:91: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class simpleBean
location: class jsp_servlet.__hello
simpleBean = (simpleBean)pageContext.getAttribute("simpleBean"); //[ /hello.jsp; Line: 12]
^
/apps/wclust1/bea/wlserver6.1/config/domadmin/applications/mywebapp/WEB-INF/_tmp_war_srvadmin_srvadmin_mywebapp/jsp_servlet/__hello.java:93: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class simpleBean
location: class jsp_servlet.__hello
simpleBean = new simpleBean(); //[ /hello.jsp; Line: 12]
^
4 errors

Well...i already could resolve my problem.....
I only put my javabean into a package...and with it....all is working very fine....
Best regards,
Mary

Unsupported Cluster configuration.

Hi
Im getting below error on refershing the host cluster I get below error . I have 2 hosts in the cluster and VMs report unsupported cluster configuration. SCVMM 2012 SP1 dont seem to see the Logical Switches . Although Upon restarting WMI Services on the
host seem to fix the issue but after couple of weeks time I get the same error again. Upon doing some research I suspect when NIC Team moves the VNICs around and SCVMM agent doesnt get the latest information and therefore shows this error .
Solutions I have applied so for and get no joy are below
1. No snapshots are saved
2. No ISO files are mounted
3. VSS service set to manual
4. Host switches have same name
5. all VHD files are stored on CSV Volumes.
6. Set one NIC in team as standby because MAC Address of the host management network is same as physical address as I have inherited the settings while creating logical networks.
Can Anyone please help

Hi Ed -
thanks for response
Although the other thread is referring to same error . I have already read that thread before starting a new one. This has been a known issue from 2008 R2 era . I have updated my SCVMM 2012 SP1 to rollup 7 but still seem to be an issue somewhere . I
can confirm that DNS server are same on both the hosts .
Does anyone think of anything else . Im happy to post the logs if anyone knows .
Thanks
Mumtaz

WL Cluster: install of weblogic is not working properly

Cluster install of weblogic is not working properly. We are getting kicked out every now and then
from the portal when both PIA1 and PIA2 nodes are up. When we shut down one meaning switch off clustering
then we are fine(Portal becomes very stable).
env setup:
Weblogic 9.2 with MP1-p5 and all the patches on Oracle Enterprise Linux 4 32 bit
PTools version - 8.49.08
Here is the message at the Kernel level if that any help:
Oct 7 10:43:22 hrrecweb01 kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq. c:141
Oct 7 10:43:23 hrrecweb01 kernel: [<c0121178>] local_bh_enable+0x3f/0x62
Oct 7 10:43:23 hrrecweb01 kernel: [<c02177b9>] skb_checksum+0x133/0x25e
Oct 7 10:43:23 hrrecweb01 kernel: [<c0250f36>] udp_poll+0x66/0x113
Oct 7 10:43:23 hrrecweb01 kernel: [<c02135e1>] sock_poll+0x19/0x1d
Oct 7 10:43:23 hrrecweb01 kernel: [<c016d777>] do_pollfd+0x42/0x7d
HRRECWEB01 is WebServer name
any thoughts? Is there a kernel variable or settings for linux that I need to set for
cluster weblogic install?
Thanks/Thaya

Kunal,
Have you tried clearing the browser cache?
-Arun

O2cb_ctl : unable to load cluster configuration file while RAC setup.

OCFS2: unable to load cluster configuration file
Hi,
I installed OCFS2 successfully.
I successfully install 3 RPMs.
I am getting error while running ocfs2console to do cluster configuration.
I tried to run this manully using "o2cb_ctl -C -n NODENAME -t node -a number=NODENUM -a ip_address=IPADDR -a ip_port=IPPORT -a cluster=CLUSTERNAME "
this commnd. but getting error as
"o2cb_ctl: Unable to access cluster service while creating node Could not add node "
Then I edited this file manually and copied to another nodes using SCP. Then tried to use o2cg_ctl utility as
# /etc/init.d/o2cb offline ocfs2
# /etc/init.d/o2cb unload
# /etc/init.d/o2cb configure
Configuring the O2CB driver.
Next, I configure /etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf:
cluster:
node_count = 2
name = oracle
node:
ip_port = 7777
ip_address = 140.187.222.222
number = 1
name = ocvmrh2053
cluster = oracle
node:
ip_port = 7777
ip_address = 140.187.222.222
number = 2
name = ocvmrh2051
cluster = oracle
Next, I try to load ocfs2 modules by command: o2cb load - everything messages is OK
And I try switch ocfs2 cluster to online (by o2cb online oracle), write this error message:
Starting cluster oracle: Failed
o2cb_ctl: Unable to load cluster configuration file "/etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf"
Stopping cluster oracle: Failed
o2cb_ctl: Unable to load cluster configuration file "/etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf"
I think both errors i get are due to same issue. Please kindly reply if anyone having idea.
Thanks.
Please anyone can help me to resolve this.
Message was edited by:
user596035

provide output of this command from all OCFS2 nodes:
ls -l /etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf
Regards,
Martin

Windows 2003 Standard Edition (Cluster Configuration Storage page)

I am trying to install RAC R2 on windows Server 2003 (Standard Edition). I am using FireWire 800 SIIG to connect to Maxtor OneTouch III External HDD.
When installing cluster Services, i do not see the Cluster Storage Devices. When i go to Computer Management, i see all the partitions of the raw device.
One "Cluster Configuration Storage" page, the Available Disks show no partitions.
Oracle installtion documentation says "On the Cluster Configuration Storage page, identify the disks that you want to use for the Oracle Clusterware files and, optionally, Oracle Cluster File System (OCFS) storage. Highlight each of these disks one at a time and click Edit to open the Specify Disk Configuration page where you define the details for the selected disk"
In my case, i do not see any disks. What am i missing?
Any Thoughts. Please advise
Thanks
-Prasad
Message was edited by:
pinjam

You have a more fundamental problem, Firewire disks will not work for RAC on Windows. The storage needs to be shared, Firewire disks can't be shared on Windows. On Linux, Oracle took the open source firewire driver and modified it to allow more than one host to connect. On Windows the driver is closed source so they can't do that.
I presume you are wanting to try-out RAC on Windows, If so another solution may be to download one of the many iSCSI Servers that are available. Microsoft ship an iSCSI Initiator for Windows, this allows you to share a 'block device' which is what RAC needs - then you can choose your RAC Database storage method of choice, ASM, OCFS, RAW. I prefer ASM

How to install webcenter sites 11.1.1.6 or 11.1.1.8 in cluster configuration and delivery mode?

I am trying to install webcenter sites 11.1.1.6 using cluster configuration and in delivery mode but its not getting installed properly.
Can anyone please share on the steps to follow while installing webcenter sites in delivery environment?

The recommendation from the Oracle WebCenter & ADF Architecture Team is to keep the parts decoupled, installing WebCenter Sites on a separate machine. Otherwise it would be leading towards a 'Type 3' integration. Specifically looking at the proof-of-concept application 'Spark', which requires WebCenter Sites and WebCenter Portal installed on the same machine:
+"Due to this co-deployment requirement, most clients have avoided installing or using Spark. And not without reason: installing two big, complex applications on the same environment is problematic with regards to scalability and tuning."+
http://blogs.oracle.com/ATEAM_WEBCENTER/entry/integrating_webcenter_sites_with_webcenter3
The introductory article on integrating WebCenter Sites and WebCenter Portal:
http://blogs.oracle.com/ATEAM_WEBCENTER/entry/integrating_webcenter_sites_with_webcenter
Thanks

Cluster Configuration in WebLogic 10.3.5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for