Cluster Over WAN Test

We are planning to put a subscriber across WAN.We have enough bandwidth (6MB) bewteen sites and we followed all the SRND recommendations(especially QOS) for Cluster over WAN.
I used extended ping with type 3 (as in SRND) to test the RTT from a switch at remote site to publisher CM and it came less then 40 ms.
Is there any other test we can do so we can test the RTT and bandwidth is enough for ICCS traffic.
Thanks for the help
Bala

you could put a good load of data on the wire across the wan, see if you can get 3-4mb (or whatever your maximum is) and then test your pings.
use the results added to the number of phones (BHCA) and see what the numbers 'should' look like.
be sure to use the bandwidth calculator if you haven't already. try for many or all different codecs.
see the bandwidth calculator at the following link: (requires cco account)
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/VBC/do/CodecCalc1.do

Similar Messages

  • Uccx cluster over wan. cad login problem

    Hi. I have uccx 8.5 cluster over wan. When the uccx publisher is down, agents can't login- invalid password. Please help.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

    Hi,
    Where are your agents situated in respect of the CCX and CUCM servers? Agents authenticate via CUCM or AD if AD authentication is enabled on CUCM have you confirmed that these are also reachable from the location in question? Have you verified serviceability on the secondary node to ensure the ccm engine and desktop services are running and in-service?
    Regards
    Allan
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Share printers over WAN

    Hello,
    I'm in the process of testing the print sharing over WAN capabilities of my TC 1GB. I believe everything is setup properly, and using 'back to my mac' I can indeed see the TC while tethered to my iPhone... though I'm not sure if 'back to my mac' has anything to do with sharing printers over WAN.
    Overview:
    TC > Printers > Shared Name (printer is showing up nicely and can print via LAN without issue)
    TC > Printers > Share printers over WAN (checked)
    TC > Printers > Share printers over internet using Bonjour (checked) (this prompted me to create a dynamic global host name)
    TC > AirPort > Time Capsule > edit... > "Use dynamic global host name" (checked) (and all related info)
    *Network Setup:*
    Cable Modem > TC > wired and wireless clients
    When I use my iPhone tethered to my mac book pro, I do see the TC, but when I open the system preferences > printer & fax > I don't see any bonjour printers (should I be able to see it here?)
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    No one has any idea?

  • Windows server 2003 Remote desktop over WAN problem.

    Ok so problem is there is a 2003 windows server in my office. Any computer phone etc. can connect to it via Remote desktop if they are in the LAN network. I have port forwarded 3389 , disabled firewalls , there is no antivirus software on the server.
    BUT I cannon log in over WAN. Heres the problem.
    I type in the WAN ip I connect with credentials.
    This is what i get:
    Connecting...
    Negotiating credentials...
    Then it just suddenly force closes.
    Also tried from a Windows 8 PC , when trying to connect it INSTANTLY throws me an error saying:
    This computer cant connect to the remote computer. If the problem continues contact etc..
    No matter where i try , a pc , a laptop , a phone , a tablet it just force closes. I can see that the devices are able to see the server and are trying to connect , but the connection just force closes for no reason and no error is shown. Also I dont see
    anything in the event viewer on the server. The credentials are correct also. And the port is forwarded correctly.
    Where could the problem be?

    Hi,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
    As you have commented that you have forwarded port correctly at windows end, but still suggest you to check whether you have port forwarded on Router which you are using for WAN connections. 
    Can your local system can make successful ping to the remote server from WAN connections?
    For testing you can telnet <router ip> 3389 and if you get blank screen then it confirm that port has been forwarded.
    It might happens that there is port assignment conflict taken place, so check with “netstat –a –o” and see port 3389 is not being used by other application, if that is the case then change the port.
    You can refer following article for more troubleshooting steps (Point 2)
    Remote Desktop disconnected or can’t connect to remote computer or Remote Desktop server (Terminal Server) that is running Windows Server 2003
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2477023
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki
    TechNet Community Support

  • CCX 8.5 in HA over WAN on Island Mode

    Hi guys,
    Does anyone know what will happen with CCX 8.5 in HA over WAN configuration goes to island mode?
    So consider the following setup
    Site A Site B
    CUCM Node --- WAN --- CUCM Node
    CCX Primary CCX Standby
    Each site have their own local voice gateway and sets of agents.
    The SRND covers that if 10 consecutive heartbeat is lost then a failover will be triggered.
    However the SRND does not cover the scenario if the WAN is totally cut and Site A and Site B is completely isolated from each other.
    Does anyone know what will happen in this situation? Will both CCX Node become Primary and operate in its own right (just like Unity Connection cluster when they go to island mode)?
    Kind regards
    Daniel

    Daniel,
    Here is more of a "step by step" to your question:
    Page 68:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_5/design/uccx851srnd.pdf
    When the WAN link has a clean break:
    and by clean break I mean it goes down and stays down, it does not
    flap or provide intermittent connectivity
    1) The CAD agents will connect to UCCX server that they can communicate with
    2) The UCCX servers will connect to the CUCM Node that they can connect
    to for call processing
    3) The calls that get to the respective UCCX servers will go to the
    respective agents
    When the WAN Link is restored:
    1) The Nodes will decide which node is more "qualified" to become the
    master node, this is generally Node 1 aka the first node that was built
    in the cluster
    2) The CAD Agents connected to the node that becomes the secondary will
    fail over to Node 1 to begin accepting calls from it
    3) All of the calls that the new master Node were processing will not
    have any negative affect as they will continue to be processed by UCCX
    4) The calls that are in queue for the node that becomes the slave in
    the cluster will be dropped

  • Time Capsule - Share over WAN

    My Time Capsule is connected to another router through Ethernet as bridge mode and wireless. Therefor the option to Share disc over WAN and i can't access it over the internet. Is it possible to set up the same Share over WAN feature on my routers web interence?

    Ok, lets get down and dirty.
    What modem router are you running?
    Does it have a DMZ and have you tried placing the TC in the DMZ?
    Many routers do not allow a connection to be made even after you have port forwarded because the firewall is turned on. Turn off the firewall in the router. Turn off the firewall in the router on the wan connection. Check that the computer firewall is also not preventing the connection.
    *Firewall is a key issue for failure to connect over WAN connections*
    Sometimes upnp in the router can mess up with manual port forwarding. Try turning off upnp.
    I would also try reset of the modem and if possible see if you can get something to ping respond to you. If the modem has a ping responder in it, turn it on to ensure you can actually get packets to the router and back again.
    I also have to ask you are actually testing from a different internet connection?? You cannot test wan port opening from LAN.. well not without nat loopback or remote proxy setup.

  • Redundancy over WAN

    Do Cisco expressway C and E  support redunancy over WAN (Across data center) for increasing capacity as well as failover scenerios.
    thanks

    The Expressway-Edge and Expressway-Core is the same software as the VCS-Expressway and VCS-Control, just pacakaged for CUCM registered endpoints - so the same principles apply.
    As Jens mentioned, each peer in a cluster needs to be within a 15ms hop (30ms round trip delay) of each and every other VCS in the cluster.
    This is mentioned in the Prerequisites section of the Cluster Creation and Maintenance Deployment Guide (4th dot point on Page 5).
    Wayne
    Please remember to rate responses and to mark your question as answered if appropriate.

  • CCP / CPO VM Migration over WAN

    Hi All,
    I've the test environment in location1 (Japan)  and production environment in location2(U.S)
    After testing completed, want to migrate the CCP / CPO VMs to production environment
    what is best approach  (VM Migration over WAN ? - with huge file size  
    or we can go for fresh install in Destination location ? if so, how to migrate the code base from CCP?   
    (for CPO we can export the process to a shared location and download it - how about CCP)
    Any best approach possible?
    Thanks,
    yoga ..           

    Hi Eneudenberger, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it.  I have thought of this as a solution and here are my thoughts.  This will certainly work with a small number of VLANs.  I am trying to serve a large number of VLANs so this solution becomes less desireable as the number of VLANS increase and therefore increases the number of firewall instances required to support the solution.  I am also trying to limit the traffic that goes through the firewalls.  This would force all off subnet traffic to flow through the firewall which is not a requirement for our solution and would increase the hardware requirements for the firewall itself, forcing us into a very large FW platform.  Besides all of that, I have used TCP state bypass to allow failover and failback between geographically disparate sites.  TCP state bypass comes with its own set of downsides,
    1.  (obvious) no TCP state maintenance.
    1a.  TCP timers need to be tweaked because connections are not removed from the firewall tables on FIN ACK.  In some environments with lots of transient short lived connections, this can cause connection count exhaustion.
    1b.  Service policy inspections for tcp don't work.  Loss of FTP inspection will turn your firewall into swiss cheese.
    1c.  Each firewall rule you may now needs a reverse rule allowing the reverse connection i.e. create a firewall rule on inside interface allowing machines to "any" on tcp destination port 80 and now you need a rule on the outside interface allowing tcp source port 80 from "any" to your machines. 
    TCP State bypass isn't fun!
    All that aside, I have been told by someone on another forum that Cisco is adding the ability to have the VM move detection separated from the xTR function so that we can put the firewalls between the WAN and the Server Distribution, which would be fantastic.  I haven't seen anything as of yet but let me know if you come across it or have any other ideas, Thanks!
    Carlo

  • Server clustering over WAN

    Hi
    i am running two Microsoft servers. One is live and the other is in DR site, they are currently on differnt subnets, and for them to cluster, they send broadcast. what can i do for this two servers to talk to each other.
    changing ip's on the router is out of the question.

    What port number and protocol do they use. If you can assign them on the same subnet you can use IRB (integrated routing and bridging) over WAN.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5304/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800f0a86.html
    -amit singh

  • CCX 8.5 HA virtual+physical server over WAN

    Hello for everyone.
    There is such task to deploy CCX 8.5 HA cluster - make one node on virtual maschine and second node on the physical server over WAN (wow! :).
    So there some question. Anybody already does this deployment model? Will there any trouble in admistration and working in such way?
    Will this configuration supported by Cisco?
    Tried to find it out on cisco.com and google.com, but no success. So i think, if Cisco supports deployment on hardware, and on virtual so there no problem. But by hardware+virtual, there's a question.
    So, any help and thoughts on this will be kindly appreciated!

    Yes it's supported as long as they are equivelent hardware. In other words you can't use the 300 OVA on one side and an MCS-7825 on the other. You would need to use a MCS-7845. Personally I wouldn't recommend this. At some point MCS hardware will fall off the compatibility matrix forcing the customer to move to UCS at that time. CCX is rather finicy when it comes to backup/restore of a node in the HA cluster. That's a task I would avoid if you can.

  • Sharing an iTunes Library over WAN?

    Sorry if this question has been asked before but my searching of the forum here has only seemed to turn up questions and anwswers on sharing over a local network. Here is my question.
    Is it possible to share an iTunes library over the internet? And if so, how? If it isn't I'd like to know so I can stop trying to track down how to do this.
    I have a Titanium G4 at home running iTunes 6.01 using a cable modem and router. The router firewall has been setup with the proper ports for iTunes and FTP (FTP works fine). My work computer is a G5 running iTunes 6.01 connected via a DSL modem/router.
    I have no other issues connecting to my home computer from work, but I can't see my shared music at home on my work computer.
    Thanks for any info.

    Issue solved. Here is what I did. I setup my Mac at home so I could connect at work. Inside the iTunes library on my work Mac I created an alias to the iTunes Music folder on my home Mac. Since my library at home and work are exactly the same iTunes on my work Mac sees a local library file but is streaming the music over WAN from my Mac at home.
    The are some stops and starts as the connection is over WAN, but it's pretty smooth. Do not know what will happen if I need to add or subtract from the library on either Mac.
    Just bringing this to the front in case anyone is interested in trying it themselves.

  • Airport Extreme and External Hard Drive. Backup over WAN?

    Hi
    I'm new to Mac's and just got a macbook air and a airport extreme.  I connected my external hard (toshiba) drive to the AE and my computer will recognize it, but when I try to connect to it using Time Machine my external hard drive is not recognized as a device that I can backup to over my WAN.  I'm not sure if this is possible, but I would like to be able to backup over the WAN if it is possible.  Is it possible to backup using time machine over WAN using an AE and a non apple external hard drive?

    Time Machine cannot backup to a hard drive unless it is formatted in Mac OS Extended (Journaled), also known as HFS+.
    You have me scratching my head about backing up through the WAN port. Normally, the WAN port would be used for a connection from a modem.....or another router.
    However, if you have the AirPort Extreme configured to connect to another router via Ethernet, and the AirPort Extreme is set to operate in Bridge Mode, then you don't have a WAN port, they are all LAN ports, so it would not matter which of the ports that you used.

  • Time Capsule 2TB missing "Share Disks over WAN" option

    I bought a time capsule about a month ago. Setup was no problem. Have a MobileMe account. Successfully setup remote access using MobileMe. Needed to select "Share Disks Over WAN" under the file sharing tab which is under the disk tab in setup in order to make it work.
    Bought another time capsule yesterday and trying to setup in another location. This model does not have that "Share Disks Over WAN" option. Am I missing something? Did Apple make a change? I am not able to access this new drive remotely now, even with my MobileMe account active.

    "As I write this, I am using my wife's iPad to browse files and folders on the Time Capsule disk. I can switch over to the disk attached to the AirPort Extreme with a single tap."
    Awesome!  Hopefully I will have the same luck as you!
    "I said that Filebrowser will do a very nice job. One of my support policies is that I never offer advice or instructions unless I have done it myself.  "
    Well that's good to know going forward!
    "Make sense?"
    Yep - no confusion whatsoever.
    Brian

  • How to run multiple CodedUI Ordered Tests over multiple Test Agents for parallel execution using Test Controller

    we are using VS 2013, I need to run multiple Coded UI Ordered Tests in parallel on different agents.
    My requirement :
    Example:   I have 40 Coded UI Test scripts in single solution/project. i want to run in different OS environments(example 5 OS ).  I have created 5 Ordered tests with the same 40 test cases. 
    I have one Controller machine and 5 test agent machines. Now I want my tests to be distributed in a way that every agent gets 1 Ordered test to execute. 
    Machine_C = Controller (Controls Machine_1,2,3,4,5)
    Machine_1 = Test Agent 1 (Should execute Ordered Test 1 (ex: OS - WIN 7) )
    Machine_2 = Test Agent 2 (Should execute Ordered Test 2 (ex:
    OS - WIN 8) )
    Machine_3 = Test Agent 3 (Should execute Ordered Test 3
    (ex: OS - WIN 2008 server)  )
    Machine_4 = Test Agent 4 (Should execute Ordered Test 4 (ex:
    OS - WIN 2012 server) )
    Machine_5 = Test Agent 5 (Should execute Ordered Test 5 (ex:
    OS - WIN 2003 server) )
    I have changed the  “MinimumTestsPerAgent” app setting value
    as '1' in controller’s configuration file (QTController.exe.config).
    When I run the Ordered tests from the test explorer all Test agent running with each Ordered test and showing the status as running. but with in the 5 Test Agents only 2 Agents executing the test cases remaining all 3 agents not executing the test cases but
    status showing as 'running' still for long time (exp: More then 3 hr) after that all so  its not responding. 
    I need to know how I can configure my controller or how I can tell it to execute these tests in parallel on different test agents. This will help me reducing the script execution time. 
     I am not sure what steps I am missing. 
    It will be of great help if someone can guide me how this can be achieved.
    -- > One more thing Can I Run one Coded UI Ordered Test on One Specific Test Agent?
    ex: Need to run ordered Test 1 in Win 7 OS (Test Agent 1) only.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi Divakar,
    Thank you for posting in MSDN forum.
    As far as I know, we cannot specify coded UI ordered test run on specific test agent. And it is mainly that test controller determine which coded UI ordered test assign to which test agent.
    Generally, I know that if we want to run multiple CodedUI Ordered Tests over multiple Test Agents for parallel execution using Test Controller.
    We will need to change the MinimumTestsPerAgent property to 1 in the test controller configuration file (QTControllerConfig.exe.config) as you said.
    And then we will need to change the bucketSize number of tests/number of machines in the test settings.
    For more information about how to set this bucketSize value, please refer the following blog.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/aseemb/archive/2010/08/11/how-to-run-automated-tests-on-different-machines-in-parallel.aspx
    You can refer this Jack's suggestion to run your coded UI ordered test in lab Environment or load test.
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/661e73da-5a08-4c9b-8e5a-fc08c5962783/run-different-codedui-tests-simultaneously-on-different-test-agents-from-a-single-test-controller?forum=vstest
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • The whole configure over WAN thing is confusing me I don't want anyone to be able to access my airport extreme over the WAN.  How can I check to make sure that is the way I have it setup?

    I just bought a new airport extreme and I want to make sure that is NOT set up for "configure over WAN".  How do I check to make sure that is how I have it set up?  I only want access to the base via WPA2 password

    Open AirPort Utility, select the AirPort Extreme, and click Manual Setup
    Click the Base Station tab located just below the row of icons
    Remove any check mark that might be in the box next to Allow Setup over WAN
    Click Update to save your settings and the AirPort Extreme will restart in 25-30 seconds
    For what it is worth, if you leave the box checked, any computer that tries to access the settings on the Airport Extreme will be asked for the device password....not the wireless network password.

Maybe you are looking for