CME COR block internal

is there anyway to block internal calls on CME? like two extensions, 101, 102, I don't want 101 call 102
other question, I have one 2600 router (CME), I have another 2800 router (with CUE), can 2600 CME use CUE on 2800 via IP?
thanks

Yes, or you can simply prevent calling 102 from 101 with a translation-profile and rule
rule 1 reject /^102/
applied incoming to dn 101
And yes, you can do that with the CUE.
Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!

Similar Messages

Blocking international numbers?

Is there a way to get international calls blocked?
More importantly calls from india?
On a daily basis I get cold callers from india calling me for various reasons like market research, PPI, Solar cells, Microsoft support scams etc.
It doesn't matter what I tell them the calls never stop. I had some success once by telling them the person they were calling was dead but that didn't last long.
These calls are really getting on my nerves now. They show up on the caller display as international. I've looked through BT caller features but I can't find a service to block international calls.
So does anyone know if there is a way to get BT to block all calls from india to my line?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

BT cannot do it, you would have to buy a 3rd party device like CPR Call Blocker, or Truecall.
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

Blocking international access

just read an interesting article in the ny times which spoke
about how worldwide spam volumes have doubled... and that spam
accounts for more than 9 of 10 email messages sent.
since a good chunk of the junk comes from outside the country
- and presumably a good chunk of the programs that scour websites
looking for email addresses are out of the country - it seems like
it would be a good idea to block international access to a site
(assuming, obviously, that one doesn't care about the quality
viewers that will be lost in the process) and also block receipt of
incoming email that originated outside the country.
possible?

You'd better go take a nap. That's way too many paragraphs
for you
today.... 8)
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"crash" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Saying it's a reasonable request and saying it's a
reasonable expectation
> are two different things. I would not do it, based
mostly on the reasons
> stated.
>
> No matter how many people might be able to see my
webpage, if I sell local
> products to a local market (say, energy), then the
global market is of no
> concern to me. Yes, I can reach them, but what does it
matter?
>
> If there is a circumstance in which the spam is causing
an overload of my
> servers to provide service to my local customers, and I
sell energy to a
> tri-state area, it may behoove me to limit my site to
only those that I
> serve.
>
> Just because my page is globally accessible doesn't mean
that's the best
> business model to uphold. Similarly, I don't code my
pages in anything
> but English because I don't have the facilities to work
with anybody that
> doesn't speak English. While they might be technically
able to buy my
> product, It's not feasible for me to sell it to them.
>
> Since very little was specified about the site, I did
not find it an
> unreasonable request. I do not agree on the OP's methods
arriving at
> this - articles don't tell you what your traffic is,
only general
> patterns.
>
>
> "Murray *ACE*" <[email protected]>
wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> You still think it's reasonable?
>>
>> --
>> Murray --- ICQ 71997575
>> Adobe Community Expert
>> (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do
so!)
>> ==================
>>
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
>>
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
>>
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
>>
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
>> ==================
>>
>>
>> "crash" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> heheh, sorry, reader wasn't showing the 800
other replies to this, and I
>>> wasn't lookign at time of posts.
>>>
>>> :O)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Blocking international traffic to BC site

Does anyone know how to block international traffic to a BC website? We recieive a flood of traffic for international countries that drastically distort our analytic reports. Thanks for any help....

I understand the usability issue. It sucks to not have the information right when you log in. Sorry.
It is normal to get visits from international countries though. Sometimes I get a lot of visits from specific countries like you did from Ukraine. This usually happens in our case when companies or bots are trying to post their links in our blog.
Take advantage of the captcha from BC if you don't use it yet in your forms. I found extremely helpful lowering the number of spam that I was getting in both my blog posts and contact request tickets.
These are some other links it might help you....
To exclude certain IP Adresses in BC
With Google Analytics these links may help you...
DATA FILTERS FOR VIEWS - Filter on geography
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1034773?hl=en&ref_topic=1034830
These are all the filters you can apply
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1034380?hl=en&ref_topic=1034830
Hope it helps.
PJ

WRT54G blocking INTERNAL traffic ?

Hello everybody!
I own a WRT 54 G v3.1 Firmware Version: v4.30.5.
Everything works fine except Age of Empires 2 Lan Games. I tried a direct connection between 2 PCs with a crossover cable and the game worked, but when we want to play via our router, we can't find hosted games. We don't want to play on the Internet, only on LAN. Is there any setting that is blocking internal Traffic ? Whats also strange: I tried DXdiag, as AOE2 uses DirectPlay, and DXdiag could establish a connection even when both PCs were connected via the router. Any ideas ? Thanks in advance.

If you have a software firewall installed connected a computer to a different router does make a difference. Those software firewalls remember the firewall settings based on where they are connected. A different router is a different location and thus has different firewall settings. Thus, you have to disable the firewall completely, maybe have to deinstall it completely (ZA is a good candidate for that) to verify whether or not it is related to the computer configuration.
Also, how do you connect between those computers for the game? Do they automatically detect each other? Do you have to enter IP addresses? Or how does it work?
Technically the LAN side of the router is a simple switch. It does not do any filtering there. It may be slightly different if a connection is wireless. It can be completely different if a router runs a 3rd party firmware.

Make and Model of stock 8-core (2008) internal 320 GB drive?

Does anybody know the Make and Model of stock 8-core (2008) internal 320 GB drive? I'm planning to do a Mac OS software RAID 0 and I want to get an identical drive to the internal one. Or if somebody can convince me this is a bad idea please let me know. Regards, -Keith

Finally upgraded from G4 Powerbook. Whew. Getting ready to set up for web dev. and perhaps some (not too intensive) video editing (maybe with FC Express) and am looking into an extra drive. Was thinking Hitachi Enterprise 750GB for sheer size but then I may not need that much storage at the moment and perhaps should go for performance with 150GB 10K Raptor and set that as boot drive? Was interested in thoughts on this. They're both about the same cost.
Thanks!
ps--will also be getting 8GB of RAM from Otherworldcomputing

Block internal batch number at plant level

Dear Experts,
I have activated the internal batch number assignments at client level. But for some plants or one of the company code, I want to block the internal batch number creation during the goods receipt at production order confirmation(CO11N). Is it possible ? How? Can we restrict for some of the plants/comany code and allow for other plants/company code?

Check this link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/25/2838bf4f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
FF

JNI - core dump - internal error on linux after calling Java method

I'm getting a core dump after calling athe main statric method using JNNI.
On linux.
I can get the class id correcttly but when I attempt to call the method it craches with an internal error , anyone know why it would crash instead of just not work.
if(cls)
    main_methodID = env->GetStaticMethodID(cls, "main", "([Ljava/lang/String;)V");
     printf("Class Found Successfully\n");
else
    printf ( "cls not found\n");
    return 0;
if(main_methodID)
          jstring first_str = env->NewStringUTF("The First String");//create string
          jobjectArray args = (jobjectArray)env->NewObjectArray(1,env->FindClass("java/lang/String"), first_str);//new array with 2 elements
               env->SetObjectArrayElement(args, 2, first_str);//insert the second string into index 1 of the array
          jstring second_str = env->NewStringUTF("The Second String");//create string
          env->SetObjectArrayElement(args, 1, second_str);//insert the second string into index 1 of the array
     env->CallStaticVoidMethod(cls, main_methodID, args);//pass the array to the Java main method
                              The JAVA method is
public static void main(String[] args) {
    System.out.println("Main method in Framework");
        Framework framework = new Framework();


I see yere points but what I see on linux is it makes it to the constructor of the Java object and somewhere afterwards it bails out, the Java app does work alone. It appears to have problems initializing the JFrame, could there be a problem with the Java inheritance when a JVM is invoked throurgh native invocation??
Here's some of the Java stuff
public class Framework extends WindowAdapter {
    public int numWindows = 0;
    private Point lastLocation = null;
    private int maxX = 500;
    private int maxY = 500;
    public Framework() {
        System.out.println("JAVA Framework cnst");//GETTING HERE
        makeNewWindow();
    public void makeNewWindow() {
        System.out.println("JAVA makeWindow"); //GETTING HERE
        JFrame frame = new MyFrame(this); //NOT GETTING HERE!!!!!!!!!
        numWindows++;
        System.out.println("Number of windows: " + numWindows);
        System.out.println("Frame location: " + lastLocation);
        frame.setVisible(true);
        System.out.println("Post Java set frame visible");
    public static void main(String[] args) {
    System.out.println("Main method in Framework");
        Framework framework = new Framework();//GETTING HERE
class MyFrame extends JFrame {
    protected Dimension defaultSize = new Dimension(200, 200);
    protected Framework framework = null;
    public MyFrame(Framework controller) {
        super("New Frame");
        System.out.println("MyFrame cnst ");//NOT GETTING HERE!!!!!!
        framework = controller;
        setDefaultCloseOperation(DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE);
        addWindowListener(framework);
        JMenu menu = new JMenu("Window");
        menu.setMnemonic(KeyEvent.VK_W);
       setSize(defaultSize);
}

Blocking Internal Order Sett Posting to Rec. Object of Different Co. Code

Hi,
We have two internal orders belonging to two different company codes. Is there a method to block an internal order settlement where the receiver Order belong to a different company code.
I would like the validatation to work, when the Second order is attached in the settelement rule of the first order. Can this requirement be met without writing a validation.
Thanks & Regards
Madhukrishna

Hi,
Why don't you try OKC9 ?
regards
Waman

Blocking international call numbers

Christina,
I am also having the same issues with international texts and I am being charged for them. I am getting messages from two numbers:
(numbers removed)
I have asked them to stop and they continue to call and text me. Is there any way you can help me to block these numbers or stop it somehow since I have been charged for the texts they have been sending me.
Thank you,
Taylor
Phone numbers removed as required by the Terms of Service.
Message was edited by: Admin Moderator

spiney wrote:
I'm getting spammed by some international number and verizon's call block only accepts 10-digit numbers. where are the options for blocking call outside of the country? there is a guide i found but it's out of date and broken.
International incoming calls cannot be blocked. Outgoing calls can only be made if an International Dialing feature is added to your account.

Blocking International Texts / Calls

I am receiving texts from an international source and a number larger than the 10 Verizon allows to be blocked.
I wouldn't mind so much but each of these texts costs me .20
Is there a way to block these texts?
I do not like getting texts that are unwanted and that I do not want to pay for this harassment.

Hello FC_Mouse,
I know it must be frustrating receiving text messages from a number you don't recognize. Although we do offer Call and Message Blocking, where you can block up to five 10-digit numbers from calling and messaging you, this option is not available with international numbers. If you don’t recognize the number who you’re receiving text messages from you do have the option of changing your mobile number by logging in to My Verizon to prevent additional charges.
DaisyP_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Blocking internal order

Hello,
Need to block a CO internal order but not kill it.
Moderator: Use 'Lock' indicator. Please, avoid asking basic questions

Hi,
Why don't you try OKC9 ?
regards
Waman

Wireless ACL - Block internal access

I need to block all access from the guest wireless to our internal network.
The following is the ACL I've come up with so far for the guest SSID. I thought seq 1 and 2 would work - 1 allow clients to communicate with DHCP and 2 block access to all internal IP addresses. I had to add seq 3 for clients to access the internet as a workaround for now. Unfortunately because of seq 3 clients can also access everything else on our internal network.. I believe the descriptions are correct. Not 100% sure. It's what I want them to do anyway.
Our DHCP Windows server hands our guest wireless clients an IP address and sets their DNS to the DNS of our ISP not our internal DNS server.
The guest VLAN DHCP range is 10.55.12.50-10.55.13.254.
Our internal network is any IP in the 10.55 range.
Our controller is a Cisco 4402.
How do I accomplish this?
ACL: GuestWiFi
Seq
Action
Source IP/Mask
Destination IP/Mask
Protocol
Source Port
Dest Port
DSCP
Direction
NoH
Desc
1
Permit
10.55.12.0 / 255.255.255.255
10.55.1.1 / 255.255.255.255
UDP
DHCP Client
DHCP Server
Any
Inbound
0
DHCP Server. Allow clients to respond to DHCP requests.
2
Deny
10.55.12.0 / 255.255.255.0
10.55.0.0 / 255.255.0.0
0
Any
Any
Any
Any
0
Block access to internal network - all 10.55 addresses
3
Permit
0.0.0.0 / 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 / 0.0.0.0
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
0

Not a problem. The order is very important.
First allow access to all of your network. This ends up being last in the sequence. Then start denying access. For our network I permitted to all and then added vlans to deny. At the very beginning of the sequence is where I allowed access to specific devices/services on vlans that are blocked. Here is an example. There could be a better way of doing this. If there is please chime in.
ACL: GuestWiFi
Seq
Action
Source IP/Mask
Destination IP/Mask
Protocol
Source Port
Dest Port
DSCP
Direction
NoH
Desc
1
Permit
0.0.0.0 / 0.0.0.0
10.55.1.117 / 255.255.255.255
UDP
DHCP Client
DHCP Server
Any
Inbound
0
Allow printer
2
Deny
10.55.12.0 / 255.255.252.0
10.55.8.0 / 255.255.252.0
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
0
Internal Wireless Vlan
3
Deny
10.55.12.0 / 255.255.252.0
10.55.5.0 / 255.255.252.0
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
0
Management Vlan
4
Permit
0.0.0.0 / 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 / 0.0.0.0
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
0
Everything

ASA5505 - Blocking internal traffic between 2 servers

Hi guys/ladies
I have a cisco ASA5505, it runs a wide site to site VPN network and has 4 servers connected to it
10.50.15.4 > fileserver
10.50.15.5 > domain controller (exchange)
10.50.15.6 > terminal server
10.50.15.7 > terminal server
Now yesterday i removed 10.50.15.6 and replaced it with a new terminal server with the same ip address, ever since the ASA is blocking traffic between it and the domain controller (example)
2
Oct 27 2012
14:51:05
106007
10.50.15.6
55978
DNS
Deny inbound UDP from 10.50.15.6/55978 to 10.50.15.5/53 due to DNS Query
What has me baffled is the only thing different between today and yesterday is the new server is windows server 2008 and the old one was windows server 2003. The new server has the same LAN ip address as the old one to make the changeover seamless for the users.
Any idea why all the sudden my ASA has decided to block the traffic between those machines? all the other machines can talk to it fine just not the domain controller, and seeing that this is a terminal server naturally you can see the problem i face!
Any help you can give would be great as this router has worked flawlessly for 2 years now without any config changes and i cant work out why its blocking traffic between those 2 machines.

Result of the command: "show cap asp | include 10.50.15.6"
15: 10:09:21.796849 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.58810 > 10.50.15.5.389: udp 163
16: 10:09:22.189153 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.58810 > 10.50.15.5.389: udp 163 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
17: 10:09:22.596252 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.50855 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
18: 10:09:23.625913 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.50855 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
19: 10:09:24.625227 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.50855 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
20: 10:09:26.635236 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.50855 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86
25: 10:09:30.653500 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.50855 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86
27: 10:09:34.655025 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.137 > 10.50.15.255.137: udp 50 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
28: 10:09:34.655071 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.138 > 10.50.15.255.138: udp 237
29: 10:09:34.655193 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.138 > 10.50.15.5.138: udp 237 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
30: 10:09:34.764700 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.49854 > 10.50.15.5.88: S 1487640872:1487640872(0) win 8192 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
31: 10:09:34.899337 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.56407 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 34 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
32: 10:09:35.901946 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.56407 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 34 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
33: 10:09:36.915937 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.56407 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 34 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
34: 10:09:37.773916 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.49854 > 10.50.15.5.88: S 1487640872:1487640872(0) win 8192 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
35: 10:09:38.942715 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.56407 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 34 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
37: 10:09:42.937695 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.56407 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 34 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
38: 10:09:43.788579 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.49854 > 10.50.15.5.88: S 1487640872:1487640872(0) win 8192 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
41: 10:09:55.803608 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.54962 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
42: 10:09:56.814166 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.54962 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
43: 10:09:57.820804 802.1Q vlan#1 P0 10.50.15.6.54962 > 10.50.15.5.53: udp 86 Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule

Block internal network traffic

I would like to allow external internet access when connected to the WLAN but block people from accessing the LAN. My current set up is the modem then a firewall then a switch and then the Linksys WRT54GL wireless router. I've tried blocking all ports except for 80 and 443 but that doesn't work. Any ideas?

The WRT is a consumer router built to make home networking for people easier. There is no way to do what you want to do with a WRT. For really secure client separation you'll need a proper wireless access point which supports at least VLANs, and a managed VLAN switch. Then you are free to control access of clients in your network.
Any access restrictions you can set up in the WRT are only for the WAN-LAN connection (where the router sits). The LAN on the ethernet level is a simply unprotected ethernet LAN. There router is not doing much on that side.

CME COR block internal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for