Co.code not defined to country or country to the calculation procedure erro

Hai All,
  Iam facing an error while creating the PO i.e., co.code not assigned to country or country to the calculation procedure error.
Actually, Iam working in 800 client and there is no TAXINN so how is it possible to assign the country India to the calculation procedure?
Please help me out.
Regards
ANU

Hi Friend,
I think you are working with SAP 4.7EE version. In 4.7EE version TAXINN procedure not created in 800 Client. If you have authorization to view 000 Client, You can find  TAXINN procedure in 000 Client.
For your problem, I will suggest 2 solutions:
Ist solution: Open simultaneously 000 and 800 clients in your system (4.7EE), then you can replicate the TAXINN procedure in 800 client.
Second solution: You can use any other available/existing Tax procedure in your client to resolve your said problem.
If you are using 4.6C version, you have to install CIN add-on.
From ECC6.0 Version you can find  TAXINN procedure in 800 client also. Please let me know if you have any clarifications.
Thanks
Chandra

Similar Messages

  • Company Code not defined in T001

    Hi Friends,
    This the error, when we try to upload the GL Entries into SAP via BDC Program.
    "Company Code not defined in T001"
    I have checked the table T001 - Company Code is their
    I have created the GL Account too for that particular company code.
    Possiblities of Error.
    Regards,
    vivek

    HI,
    I have already checked everything is fine.
    My dought is in BDC Program.
    When i tested in Testing it is working fine?
    Can you help me out?
    I need to check
    Parameters, Validations, Mapping Else

  • Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE

    Hello,
    We are facing any issue with the error "Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE"
    We are in mid of production bill run and this is getting very critical. Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
    The company code country is SE (Sweden)
    We have 2 BPs with address in California, US.
    The Billing is successful for both the BPs.
    While invoicing, one BP is successful.
    The other is going in error "Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE".
    Error Details
    Jurisdiction code not defined for procedure TAXSE
    Message no. FF748
    Diagnosis
    You have entered a jurisdiction code in a country whose calculation procedure
    does not allow the entry of jurisdiction codes.
    System Response
    Procedure
    Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system
    settings.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    Change your calculation procedure so that tax calculation is carried out
    using the jurisdiction code.
    The BP and the CA setup is exact for both the cases.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Go to the following SPRO config-
    SAP Customizing Implementation Guide-->Financial Accounting-->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable--->Basic Functions--->Contract Accounts--->Field Modifications--->Configure Field Attributes per Activity
    Select Change and double-click on field grouping Jurisdiction code.
    You will get the following screen.
    You have to tick the option Changes plannable and then you will be able to remove jurisdiction code from CAA2
    Hope it helps..
    Thanks,
    Amlan

  • Company code not defined in MIRO

    Hi,
    My PO price is 100$.When i try to give the amount 101 in MIRO.It is giving the error"Company code not defined"
    Please help me in resolving this issue.
    Thanks
    Srini

    Hi,
    1st check entry of your company code in table T169P.
    Now maintain the  tolerance limits for your Company code in OMR6 t.code for the tolerance key DQ {Exceed amount: quantity variance} and PP {Price variance } and save.
    Try your transaction MIRO now.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • In MB1B - Error " AC519 - Company code not defined"

    Dear All,
    I tried posting in T-code MB1B & ME2O for Sub contracting (Item category L in PO).
    After assigning Purchase Order in MB1B or ME2O, system is giving Error Msg
    " Company code not defined" Message no. AC519
    AC519 is related to Asset Accounting.
    I have checked OBY6 all the settings is in place.
    All answers/suggestion will be rewarded with point.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Velu Mudaliar

    Hello Velu,
    This may help:
    You have to check the content of tables T093C, T093U, T093B, T093D.
    There might be entries with value '    ' (initial).
    If you cannot use SE16N to delete these entries, or you may create a
    a self made abap to delete the entries.
    cheers,
    Jon

  • AA821 - Company code  not defined in Asset Accounting

    Dear Experts,
    We are trying to Settle AUC using AIBU. Wherein we found error "AA871 - Company code  not defined in Asset Accounting" in the last fiscal year
    When we try to settle in current date, it is not giving any error.
    We found one sap note "SAP Note 459719 - AIBU: Message AA821,AW521 for settlmt rule with "To" period". The note mentions that we need to remove the to period and to fiscal year from the settlement rule in transaction AIAB. However, there is not settlement rule in AIAB, instead there are documents posted to AUC asset.
    Can any one assist in where to update the settlement rule or any alternative solution to the error mentioned above.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Nirav

    Dear Ravi,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Even I encountered the same note.
    However, it is not the solution.
    The solution was to detach the existing Settlement Rule and create a new one.
    Thanks anyways.
    Regards,
    Nirav Shah

  • Transaction code not defined - Reg

    Hi ,
    I have copied the program  RKAEP000 ( of transaction KSB1) into ZRKAEP000. I have assigned to new transaction to the program ZRKAEP000 and screen no :0100 .
    When I try to exicute the tranction system  is throwing below message .
                                     'Transaction code not defined'
    Can you please let me know if i miss any process.
    I am getting the same error when i try to exicute the program RKAEP000 from se38 .
    Thanks in advace,
    Regards,
    Jagadeshwar.G

    Hi Jagadeshwar ,
    Program RKAEP000 uses a function module , K_LINE_ITEM_LOGICAL_KEY_GET.
    This fm has input as tcode name... and you are getting error in your program because this FM is fixed for only few tcodes....that is few T codes are hard coded in this FM
    the code for that FM is as follows:
      CASE I_TCODE.
    documents
        WHEN 'KSB5'.
          E_ITEM_GROUP = CON_ITEM_GROUP-COST_ACTUAL.
          E_REP_OBJECT = CON_REP_OBJECT-DOCUMENTS.
        WHEN 'KABP'.
          E_ITEM_GROUP = CON_ITEM_GROUP-COST_PLAN.
          E_REP_OBJECT = CON_REP_OBJECT-DOCUMENTS.
    cost centers
        WHEN 'KSB1'.
          E_ITEM_GROUP = CON_ITEM_GROUP-COST_ACTUAL.
          E_REP_OBJECT = OBJEKTART_KS.
        WHEN 'KSBP'..........................................
    and so on.----
    So when u give ur tcode.... it is goin to give error.
    you need to copy this FM and make modification for your req.
    Edited by: brijesh soni on Sep 1, 2009 8:31 AM

  • Transaction code not defined

    HI Guru's,
    I have a little problem, when I do a
    SUBMIT rkaep000
        WITH SELECTION-TABLE i_tab
         TO SAP-SPOOL
    I receive the following error message : "Transaction code not defined"
    When I try also to run alone the program "rkaep000" se38, I receive the same error.
    Anybody have a solution?
    Regards,
    MohameD.

    Use call transaction method. Call the program by using following relevent t-code.
    T-Code      program                                                                                Description
    CJIG     RKAEP000     800          80          Display PS Cash Documents
    CPB1     RKAEP000     120          80          Business Processes: Act. Line Items
    CPBP     RKAEP000     220          80          Business Processes: Plan Line Items
    KABP     RKAEP000     400          80          Controlling Documents: Plan
    KKAA     RKAEP000     740          80          Sales Document Line Items Res.Anal.
    KKCA     RKAEP000     630          80          Cost Objects: Variance Line Items
    KKCP     RKAEP000     230          80          Cost Object Line Items - Plan
    KKCS     RKAEP000     130          80          Cost Objects: Line Items - Actual
    KKFB     RKAEP000     650          80          RS Header: Line Items Variance
    KOB1     RKAEP000     110          80          Orders: Actual Line Items
    KOB2     RKAEP000     310          80          Orders: Commitment Line Items
    KOB3     RKAEP000     610          80          Orders: Variance Line Items
    KOB4     RKAEP000     910          80          Orders: Budget Line Items
    KOB5     RKAEP000     510          80          Orders: Maint. Line Item Settlement
    KOB6     RKAEP000     510          80          Orders: Settlement Line Items
    KOB7     RKAEP000     510          80          Orders: Line Item Settlement Retirem
    KOB8     RKAEP000     710          80          Orders: WIP/Results Anal. Line Items
    KOBP     RKAEP000     210          80          Orders: Plan Line Items
    KRMI     RKAEP000     150          80          Run Sched. Header: Line Items Actual
    KSB1     RKAEP000     100          80          Cost Centers: Actual Line Items
    KSB2     RKAEP000     300          80          Cost Centers: Commitment Line Items
    KSB5     RKAEP000     400          80          Controlling Documents: Actual
    KSBP     RKAEP000     200          80          Cost Centers: Plan Line Items
    KVBI     RKAEP000     140          80          Sales Documents: Line Items Actual
    KVBO     RKAEP000     320          80          Sales Documents: Commit. Line Items
    Thank You,
    Ganesh

  • Compny code not defined

    Dear All,
    Compny code not defined issue is coming in VL02N Tcode
    Message No F5165.
    This is Inter company related transactions. Since is company codes are wrking from last 2 years.
    Please revert if any

    Basically, you can assume from the error message that Customizing is incomplete concerning company code (field BUKRS in table T001K) or valuation area (field BWKEY in table T001W).
    Or field WERKS may not be maintained in the preceding document (order) for the corresponding delivery item. As a result, the system does not find a valuation area in table T001W as well.
    Refer Note 509033 - Goods issue: Error F5165 when posting goods movements

  • Tax code not defined in ERS

    Hi,
    When i create PO and check the ERS invoice expected check box,I get the error messgae as below:
    Enter Tax Code for ERS settlement.
    Pls advise.

    Hi
    First of all check the vendor mater and in that Purchasing data for ERS setelements and after that check the tax procedure. If the tax procdure is not define for the ERS then you need to define in the system.
    REgards
    sAtsih

  • Company Code not defined

    Hi,
    I have copied the standard program behind FB60 and created a new transaction named ZFB60. There is no change in the code except that I have added a field on the main screen.
    Now the problem is when I run my transaction, it pops a dialog box and asks me
    for the Company code. After entering that, it takes me to the main screen where when I enter fields 'Vendor' , 'Invoice date' and 'Reference', it gives me an error "Company code  is not defined". But if with the same set of data I execute the original transaction FB60, it gives me no error.
    My problem is that can any one tell me, why this error is coming, when I have made no changes to the original code. The only change that I have made is adding a field in the tablecontrol that comes on the main screen.
    Can anyone help me?
    Points assured for helpful answers.

    Hi
    Probably the program does some controls using the value of SY-TCODE, so u should find and replace them.
    So if you have : IF TCODE = 'FB60', you should replace it with IF TCODE = 'ZFB60'.
    It's not easy to create a copy of FB60, because the main program (SAPMF05A) of FB60 is called by many transactions, so it has a different behavior for every trx.
    Max

  • T-code not in any role but shown in the SUIM report

    Hi friends
    I have a t-code which is not any role, but when i run the SUIM reports for Where used list>Authorization Values>In Roles by entering the S-tcode in the Object1 field and t-code in the entry value field the report brings out a role where this t-code is used. I have been into that role and checked if that t-code is in the menu tab, but i could not find  it. I also ran the SUIM for Roles By Complex Selection Criteria but i could not find a role where this t-code is in. But how come when i run the report for Where Used list it brings this t-code
    Any quick thoughts on this are highly appreciated as this is a High priortiy.
    Thanks in advance
    KV

    Abhishek Belokar wrote:Hello Abhishek,
    As Alex indicated, you can use this FM (function module) to correct inconsistencies, primarily on the UST* tables which are used by SUIM. If you have been doing a lot of  manual changes to authorizations and using ranges, then this can happen (particularly so if you are changing authorizations in production...). As far as I know, in the latest SAP releases (from 6.40 onwards) this should not normally occur that easily...
    I looked into this FM a bit, as I have not used it in quite some time now (see above comments).
    Right upfront, the function group name which it belongs to (SUSI) has a "(FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY!)" comment in it...
    Perhaps you also read that comment (which is activity '03')... 
    I was however not able to generate a test environment and execute it, because I am not authorized for SUSI... (see SAP note 587410 to distinguish between them).
    I did find reports which call this, so you might be lucky there (and not need S_DEVELOP authorizations to do this... but without the table_type = 'X')
    However, I did try to make a bit more sense of it, without actually running it... (some corrections to my above post - but still not authoritative on the topic)
    table_type 'U' = (which is default) synchronizes USR04 from UST04, however UST04 might still have phantom entries in it.
    table_type 'P' = synchronizes UST10* from UST04, though how that is meant to work I really dont know.
    table_type 'A' = synchronizes UST12 from UST10*, see above and also includes "BIS" values.
    table_type 'X' = syncrhonize UST04 from USR04, then table_type 'U', 'P' and 'A'.
    Running it "just for fun" is okay in a sandbox...
    Running it in a production system.... is also okay to fix a mess once you are there... but you could seriously disrupt the business processes (see above comment about manual changes, also in production).
    >
    > I ran this function module in a sandbox....and guess what...i saw some changes :
    > I ran with parameter 'X':
    >
    > (Picked 3 UST* tables, number of entries)
    > Table             Before           After
    > UST04       67,651     67,340
    > UST10C     10,972           10,968
    > UST10S     198,915          198,902
    Consider yourself blessed (unless the developers run this regularly in the sandbox...
    Kind regards,
    Julius

  • I am getting a message Internal Error Instacast keys not defined when I open one of the local tv news apps on my iPad. What do I need to do to fix it?

    I am getting an error message "Internal error Instacast Keys not defined" when I open a news app from one of my local tv stations. What is causing this?

    Hello, MommaLloyd24. 
    Thank you for visiting Apple Support Communities.
    Here are the steps I would recommend going through as they should resolve the issue.
    iTunes 11.1.4 for Windows: Unable to install or open
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS5376
    Cheers,
    Jason H.

  • Account document not created Message no. VF062 for the pricing procedure

    When I tried to create an invoice I came across this problem of Account document not created Message no. VF062.
    I created a pricing procedure with base price,BED,EDU CESS,HIGH EDU CESS ,VAT,CST.
    Condtion record was set for each pricing condtion type.
    Sale order>delivery->invoice
    When invoice was stored i get the message accounting document not created.
    After that i changed the condtion class of (BED,EDU CESS,HIGH EDU CESS ,VAT,CST.) from D-tax to B-price.Now the invoice is stored without the messag(accounting document not created).What will be the problem associated with this

    i changed the condtion class of (BED,EDU CESS,HIGH
           EDU CESS ,VAT,CST.) from D-tax to B-price
    Whaterver condition types you have with condition class as D, I am sure, you should have assigned some Account Keys in your Pricing Procedure.  Ensure that those Account Keys are appearing in OB40 as otherwise, you will face this issue.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • #0000# code not working and a little review on the...

    Hi Guys!
    First of all, I was told that the code #0000# told you what version of FirmWare you have..... well whenever I try EVEN in a 3.5G internet connection/signal it goes:
    Requesting (loading)
    Request not complete (info icon)
    Can anyone help???
    Also I managed to have a little go on my aunties N97 and here is my "review of it"
    I do LOVE the flip action, but I think it is a bit too big so in ways I like the "mini" version as it will be the same size as my 5800 except I hate it because they have backstabbed every N97 owner.....
     I do agree that it is slow and laggy, I don't like the Menu key position, I prefer it in the center.
     I like that it has a 5 MegaPixel camera instead of the 3.2 I have to do with my 5800.
    But overall? I would rate it 5/10.
    Also if you are going to buy a 5530, DON'T buy it's bigger brother the 5800, it doesn't have many features..... the 5800 is better.
    That is just my opinion you may differ.
    Thanks!!
    Chater Jordan
    Hope you found my posts helpful hit that Kudos button please!
    Chater Jordan E70 >>> E65 >>> 5800
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Also I managed to have a little go on my aunties N97 and here is my "review of it"
    I do LOVE the flip action, but I think it is a bit too big so in ways I like the "mini" version as it will be the same size as my 5800 except I hate it because they have backstabbed every N97 owner.....
     I do agree that it is slow and laggy, I don't like the Menu key position, I prefer it in the center.
     I like that it has a 5 MegaPixel camera instead of the 3.2 I have to do with my 5800.
    But overall? I would rate it 5/10.
    Also if you are going to buy a 5530 DON'T, buy it's bigger brother the 5800, it doesn't have many features..... the 5800 is better.
    That is just my opinion you may differ.
    Thanks!!
    Chater Jordan
    Sorry! I mean "DON'T, buy it's bigger brother the 5800" thanks! 
    Hope you found my posts helpful hit that Kudos button please!
    Chater Jordan E70 >>> E65 >>> 5800

Maybe you are looking for