CO-Products Procees order settlement issue

Hi Gurus,
I've a Process order with Co-Product items my settlement rule says 100% PER to CTR (Cost Center) and 0% for OIT (Order Items). When I try to settle this order instead of posting variances to Settlement receiver it's posting Credit (Goods receipts) of order to cost center and debits to Header material's OBYC G/L account? Any ideas?? I did all the month-end closing steps such as CO8A, KKS1 and KO88 etc..
Thanks
RG

Hi,
Check the Sender or Receiver details in KO88 or CO88, You will Find your OLD GL Account. IF SO Check the Settlement Profile of the Production Order and from Settlement Profile check the Allocation Structure ,ther might the OLD GL Assigned in it. Remove it and replace with your new GL.
the above assignment will be the reason for geting Error in KO88 or CO88.
Thanks
Goutam
Edited by: Goutam78 on Jun 2, 2011 7:12 PM

Similar Messages

Production Order settlement issue

Hi ,
We are planning to do re-work . We want to capture the labor activties for the order. Is it possible to settle the labor activties only for the order settlement ?
Thanks
Nic

Hi Nick,
From a business stand point you have two options to follow:
1. settle the costs to the original Production order
2. Settle the costs to seperate cost center
for both cases, you need to have seperate Production Order type. Because the settlement paratment are different from regular production order type.
So please use seperate Production order type with settlement profile being settlement to Cost Center.
Hope this will solve your issue
Best Regards
Surya

Prd Order Settlement Issue

Hi all,
While carrying out production order settlement for a production order, the system is determining the wrong GL A/C. Well it's deriving the GL A/C which does not exist. I need to change this assignment to a valid GL A/C. How am I suppose to fix this?
It's an MTO order, settlement cat. SDI. I'm not sure why the settlement rule is SDI for this specific order too, normally it should be MAT.
Regards,
G. Coelho

The valuation now is for sales order is incorrect. SDI means that the sales order stock is non-valuated and sales order is used to capture the costs. This is because the requirement class of the sales order is incorrect.
First check the requirement type in sales order (VA03). In procurement tab of the first main screen, it will show the requirement type for your sales order item.
Then check t-code OVZH, there will be a link between requirement type and requirement class.
Then check OVZG to check the requirement class.
(If you want to change, use the config.path Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Cost Object Controlling -> Product Cost by Sales order -> Control for Sales-order-related Production... -> Check requirement class. Howeiver, this should be done after you consult with SD and CO consultant)
You will see the your requirement class. Check whether account assignment cat., and valuatio are both set to M (ind.cust.order w/o CO, and valuated sales order stock). I suspected that a sales order per your issue is set to non-valuated stock (Account Assignment E, valuation blank).
Hope it helps.
Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 16, 2010 1:34 PM

Internal Order Settlement Issue

HI,
I have posted some entries in Postage internal orders. But when i tried to settle that in KO88, it is showing the below message.
No Transaction Data Posted Since Last Settlement
Actually once the client executed KO8G transaction for all orders. At that time 2 Orders was not settled. Now When i tried to settle them in KO88, It is giving the above message.
Why it is not getting settled? How to fix this error. Kindly help me
Thanks
Kishore

Dear,
Because these order are alreaddy settled. No balance on these order please check in KKBC_ORD. You can just settle additional amounts posted since last settlement.
For deatils refer this link,
Order Settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

KO88 Order Settlement Issue

Hi,
I have executed one production order in KO88,I am getting the below error.kindly advice me
ERROR MESSAGE:"CREATE COST ELEMENT FOR 403530"
I CANNOT CREATE COST ELEMENT FOR 403530-GAIN/LOSS PRODUCTION VARIANCE, BECAUSE IT WILL LEAD DUPLICATION IN CO-PA
Kindly advice me how to solve this issue.
Thanks
Supriya

Hi Supriya,
Why do you feel it will lead to duplication in CO-PA?
By the way is the Production Order is for Make to Stock? And is the Material is set to Standard cost or moving average?
Pl.provide more details
Regards,
Som

Process order settlement issue

When we are settling process order to the material, which is having std price.The following entry is passed.
1) Price diffrence account- Debit/ credit (prd)
2)Inventory movement -Debit/ credit (gbb-vbr)
For point 2,the material code is not passed in FI doc.
Can ny one knows the reason for this?

FI docuemt gets generated with reference to the GL of the respective material, which is based on the Valuation class.
You can also try , by CHECKING "Material Origin" in costing 1 view of material master.

Internal Order Settlement Issue (KO88)

Hi,
While doing KO88 to settle the internal order, the full amount of asset is not getting capitalised. My allocation structure and the settlement rule are correct.
For Eg. Asset Value = INR 1000000
            Down Payment = INR 200000
However, while doing KO88, the system should capitalise entire INR 1000000, but it capitalising only INR 800000.
the first line item shows                                 INR 1000000
the second line item shows                            INR 200000- (this amount is hitting some primary cost element configured in           the (OKEP Down payment - default cost element assignment) screen
the net amount (that will be capitalised =       INR 800000
can anybody assist me on this.........

Hi,
you can settle using "PER" settlement rule doing it period by period. Just key in the actual posting period in the field "posting period" in ko88.
Example: you are missing settlements from period 002/2009 to 009/2009, actual period is 011/2009. So you settle period 002/2009 with "PER" in posting period 011/2009. Aftre this had happened, settle 003/2009 to posting period 011/2009, and so on...
Best regards, Christian

Work order settlement issue

Hi
I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
Thanks & Regards
Nadini

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

KO88/CO88 Production Order Settlement Requires CO Object

Dear SAP Experts,
My client has two different plants (2000 and 2100). This is the first month end for 2100.
We are trying to settle Production Orders for both the plants. There is no issue relating to 2000 but for 2100, we are having an error "Account 52601 requires an assignment to a CO object - Message no. KI235".
Please guide on how to solve this error.
Best Regards...

Dear SAP Experts,
Thanks for the comments you all made on my posts.
The error is now solved. I'll brief so that in future, if error like again appears for someone else, they may even check the following:
The issue was that on running KO88/ CO88, there was an error stating GL Account requires Cost Object msg KI235.
On analysing the error, it was found that GL accounts appear from OBYC GBB-AUF which is the account for order settlement and again in OBYC PRD the account for price difference.
It was identified that the same accounts were assigned to both the keys. Price Difference accounts does not have cost element whereas the other account coming from GBB-AUF has Cost Element and the cost object being the Order itself.
The issue was resolved by changing the account assignment on PRD. The new account assigned was Price difference.
Thanks and Regards...

Error while doing production order settlement

Hi frds,
When I am doing the production order settlement, I am getting the following error
" There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
The status of the order is TECO CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS MANC.
Rajnish

Rajnish,
Please check if there is cost balance for the order, to me it looks like the order is already settled. In the order display mode (CO03) menu bar Goto->Costs->Balance.
If balance exists then the problem may be related to the settlement period used in the Intial screen of transaction KO88. Please check the cost incured period and use the same period as settlement period.
Regards,
Prasobh

Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

Hello guys,
Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

Hi,
No need to create material as UNBW type.
Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
In the BOM of FG or SFG goto item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
Regards,
Dharma

Production Order Settlement Process with respect to a Project

Hello All,
I know about normal Production Order Settlement Process in discrete industries.
Can anyone give me the steps for the Production Order Settlement Process if the Production Order is created with respect to a Project in SAP PP- PS Integration Scenario.
Thanks in advance for your support.

Hi Experts,
Can anyone clarify my above queries.
Thanks in advance for your support

Production order settlement (co88/ko88)

when we settle the production order variances , it will take one account from OBYC(t-code)/PRD-PRF. But how does systemdetermines the other account?
and what should be the GL entry?
Like Credit which balnce sheet account /P&l account
Or debit which balnce sheet account /P&l account

Hi,
it is going to hit GBB-AUA or GBB-AUF based on your configuration.
AUA: for order settlement
AUF: for goods receipts for orders (without account assignment) and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained.
PRD-PRF- GL account should not to be a cost element.make sure that.
Are you analysing production variance in COPA?if so.check the configuration
1.Configuration like allocation structure,PA transfer structure,Settlement profile.
2.Variance Analysis configuration,like target version,variance key etc.
Postings:
Credit : GBB-AUA or AUF -->
Debit : PRD-PRF--> this should not a be cost element.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks,
Rau

Auto Production Order Settlement

Dear experts,
Please advise how to implement the auto production order settlement (configuration, exit)?
i need to automatically carry out the settlement procedures (in the background?) as soon as the production order gets the 'TECO' status.
I searched for similar question but not answered
http://scn.sap.com/thread/463939
Thanks for your kind suggestions in advance.
Best Regards,
Gary

Hi Gary,
What I meant here was, let's assume you have 10 plants where TECO would be done for Prod. Orders
Assuming that you split the batch jobs based on the number of the open Prod. Orders in a plant and then have them run once a day to avoid excessive use of system resources.
The program can be found with search string *CO88* in SE38.
The settlement would happen for the Orders which has the TECO status as per the standard SAP design, only difference would be that the once having no changes would be ignored and with the newly TECOed Prod. orders would be considered for the settlement.
Hope that helps!
Varshal Kachole
The SCN Rules of Engagement

Production Order Settlement

Dear All,
When I am trying to settle production order ( T.code: KO88 ) I am getting the error as
Moving average price for material is negative: 100504 2300
Message no. M8783
Kindly suggest remedies for this.
Rgds
Srini

Normally what happens is that when you have a material with price control as moving average instead of standard price. The moving average is updated when you do production order settlement
In your case, the settlement is trying to bring down the price to negative. Check this would resolve yr error.
You might want to change the materials from moving average to standard or check why the settlement is taking your moving average to negative.

CO-Products Procees order settlement issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for