Code generation bug in C++ 5.0

The enclosed test program generates incorrect code
with C++ 5.0 when -g is not used.
The problem showed up in our production code
and concerns any reference counted smart pointer
implementation.
The test program is specifically written to demonstrate
the problem and diagnose a reference miscount.
With any optimization at all (without -g, and/or with
any level of -O including no -O) it generates
incorrect results. With -g the results are correct.
gcc compiles this correctly with any optimizations
selected.
// main.cc
// test program to demonstrate code generation bug in
// Sun WorkShop Compilers C++ 5.0
// bug exhibited as of 27th April 2001
// relevant patches applied:
// 107289-05 Packages: SPROcc
// 107390-12 Packages: SPROtl7x, SPROsclx, SPROtll7x, SPROcplx, SPROlgcx
// 107311-12 Packages: SPROscl, SPROtll7, SPROtlbn7, SPROcpl, SPROgc, SPROlgc
// 107357-11 Packages: SPROlang
// correct behaviour with CC -g:
// CC -g main.cc -o main; ./main
// incorrect behaviour with CC (no -g):
// CC main.cc -o main; ./main
#include <stdio.h>
class O {
public:
inline O() : m_refCount(0) { };
inline void ref() { m_refCount++; }
inline void deref() { m_refCount--; }
inline int refCount() { return(m_refCount); }
private:
int m_refCount;
class R {
public:
inline R() : m_object(0) { };
inline R(const R &r) : m_object(r.m_object) { if (m_object) m_object->ref(); }
inline R(O *o) : m_object(o) { if (o) o->ref(); };
inline ~R() { if (m_object) m_object->deref(); }
inline R &operator =(const R &r) {
if (this == &r) return(*this);
O *o = m_object;
if (m_object = r.m_object) m_object->ref();
if (o) o->deref();
return(*this);
inline R &operator =(O *n) {
if (m_object == n) return(*this);
O *o = m_object;
if (m_object = n) n->ref();
if (o) o->deref();
return(*this);
inline operator O *() const { return(m_object); }
inline O *operator ->() const { return(m_object); }
private:
O *m_object;
class B {
public:
inline B(const R &r) : m_ref(r) { };
inline const R &ref() { return(m_ref); }
private:
R m_ref;
R buggy(int notnull, B &b)
return(notnull ? b.ref() : 0); // BUG HERE
int main()
O o;
R r(&o);
B b(r);
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
R s;
s = buggy(!0, b);
printf("refCount: %d (should be 2)\n", o.refCount());

How do I file a bug report for this and get
a bug ID assigned?

Similar Messages

  • Code generation bug in Sun Studio 12

    Hi,
    The following program prints `Failure' when compiled with -xO4 where nothing should be printed (when compiled with no optimization or -xO2). It looks to me that the first comparison `buggy_routine' against 0x80 is returning True where it should return False.
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    typedef unsigned long long int      EIF_NATURAL_64;
    typedef unsigned char   EIF_BOOLEAN;
    typedef int EIF_INTEGER_32;
    typedef char * EIF_REFERENCE;
    char s[] = "9223372036854775808";
    void buggy_routine (EIF_REFERENCE Current, EIF_NATURAL_64 arg1)
        EIF_NATURAL_64 tu8_1;
        tu8_1 = (EIF_NATURAL_64) ((EIF_INTEGER_32) 128L);
        if ((EIF_BOOLEAN) (arg1 <= tu8_1)) {
        } else {
            if ((EIF_BOOLEAN) (arg1 <= ((EIF_NATURAL_64)  9223372036854775808ull ))) {
            } else {
                  printf("Failure\n");
    int main (int argc, char ** argv, char **envp ) {
        EIF_NATURAL_64 loc2 = (EIF_NATURAL_64) 0;
        loc2 = (EIF_NATURAL_64) atoll(s);
        buggy_routine ("s", loc2);
    }To reproduce:
    cc -xO4 bug.c -o bug ; ./bug
    It fails on both 32 and 64-bit code generation for x86. I haven't tried on Sparc as I need to install Sun Studio 12. Is this a known issue? Is there an easy workaround?
    I tried with Sun Studio 11 and it worked just fine there.
    Regards,
    Manu
    PS: I've tried with both version (the first is the one from the default installation) and the second after I noticed there were some patches available:
    cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-01 2007/07/12
    cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-02 2007/11/27

    An issue filed at bugs.sun.com does not go directly into the bug database. It is evaluated, and if it turns out the report is actually a bug not previously reported, goes into the database. You get a notification and chance to reply after the report is evaluated.
    In this case, I picked up your report myself, and filed the bug. The bug ID is 6654314, and will be visible at bugs.sun.com in a day or two.

  • Code Generation Bug in Forms 10g

    We're hitting this goofy bug in Forms 10g (also occurs in 9i) code generation of the On-xxx triggers. I have an "obj" package that declares an index-by array type that's used by multiple packages, including a "qry" package and "dml" package (in good ol' Steven Feuerstein tradition). The On-xxx triggers pass this type into packaged procedures that perform the Insert, Update, Delete and Lock required by Forms. These DML routines are in the "dml" package.
    When we look at the generated trigger code, we see that the index-by array type is incorrectly referenced as dml.obj.idx. That is, since the On-xxx trigger is calling DML routines in the "dml" package, it's improperly qualifying the reference with the dml package name. The On-xxx trigger code gets regenerated every time we do Compile Module. We tried doing Compile All, which doesn't regenerate the On-xxx triggers; but neither does it produce an fmx file.
    Is this a known bug, and is there a workaround? I can't move the index-by array type declaration to the dml package because it's used by multiple packages. If I fix it in one place, I break it in another. I can't have multiple declarations of this type in multiple packages either, because I'm passing it around between the packages, and they're not type-compatible at that point.

    It looks like the Forms Wizard is the real culprit. When we looked at the Property Palette for each On-xxx trigger, where the target procedure is specified, along with the parameters, is where the malformed dml.obj.ref code appears. Once we edited those entries, the On-xxx triggers generated correctly.

  • Code generation bug

    Hi,
    I have the following version of `cc':
    cc: Sun C 5.7 Patch 117837-05 2005/07/19
    Here is the file `bug.c':
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    void my_buggy_routine (char * Current, int arg1) {
    int loc1 =-arg1;
    if ((unsigned char)(loc1 == ((int) 0x80000000L))) {
    loc1 = -(loc1 / ((int)10L));
    printf ("Value is %d.\n", loc1);
    int main (int argc, char ** argv, char **envp ) {
    if (argc > 1) {
    my_buggy_routine (NULL, atoi (argv[1]));
    If you perform the following command line:
    cc -xO2 bug.c -o bug ; bug -2147483648
    You expect to get:
    Value is 214748364
    However you get:
    Value is -214748364
    If you remove the optimization when compiling then everything works fine.
    I've noticed that if I change the line:
    if ((unsigned char)(loc1 == ((int) 0x80000000L))) {
    by
    if (loc1 == ((int) 0x80000000L)) {
    then it works fine.
    Is it a known bug?
    Regards,
    Manu

    I forgot to say that it was on Solaris 10 for x86 running on a AMD64. Both 32bits and 64bits version of the program exhibit the problem.
    I've tried on Solaris Sparc with:
    cc: Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07
    and it works fine.
    Regards,
    Manu

  • Multiple POST-MAPPING Processes Code Generation BUG

    We are testing OWB 10gR2, and we were very happy to see that there is option to include more than one postmapping operator.
    The idea is to create mapping with two post-mapping operators and that:
    - one procedure is executed in case of 'Post-Mapping Process Run Condition' = ON ERROR
    - and other procedure in case of 'Post-Mapping Process Run Condition' = ON SUCCESS.
    But, after implementation of this case, we were dissapointed. We discover that neither procedure is executed.. ?!?!
    After analyzing generated code in 'finalize' method there is code like this:
    IF NOT get_abort THEN
    IF get_abort THEN
         BEGIN
    As you can see this condition will never bee true ?!?
    Doe's anyone have same problem?

    1) If you have somehow got multiple post-mappings working, I would consider that to be buggy behaviour that you cannot depend on for future releases or upgrades. As such, building a solution that depends on this has risk.
    2) You could always build a user-defined custom transformation that takes a list of tables to truncate and does so. Something like (untested, uncompiled, seat-of-the-pants written right here example to get you started):
    create or replace procedure trunc_tables(tablist varchar2)
    is
    local_tablist varchar2(2000) := tablist;
    this_Table varchar2(30);
    nextindex number := 1;
    begin
    nextindex := instr(local_tablist,',');
    while nextindex != 0 loop
    this_table := substr(local_tablist,1,nextindex-1);
    execute immediate 'truncate table '||this_Table;
    local_tablist := substr(local_tablist,nextindex+1);
    nextindex := instr(local_tablist,',');
    end loop;
    -- if no trailing semicolon there is still one table left
    if length(local_tablist) > 0 then
    execute immediate 'truncate table '||local_tablist;
    end if;
    end;
    You could then reference this in your post-mapping procedure with a call to trunc_Tables('table1,table2,table3'), and could re-use this code across all mapping that need it.
    Of course, if you have a lot of mapping-specific stuff to do then you might need to build custom transformations for each mapping that need to do different things as part of their post-process.
    Mike

  • Enhanced Flash Builder Code Generation Functionality

    For voting in JIRA:
    https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-27169
    The code generation feature FB 4 currently has is only really useful for quick throwaway prototyping or very simple forms. The generation should allow you to configure formatting via default templates, AND optionally utilize a dialog box (similar to that used in refactoring but with a few extras) so that you can configure the contents of each generated function and provide appropriate function names according to coding best practices. For example:
    -User initiates event handler generation
    (Optional, if Codegen dialog is enabled)
    -User is prompted with a dialog that allows them to customize the generated function name, and possibly specify whether they need an Event parameter passed to the function. (Default to NO event parameter, but this could be a pre-configured user option.)
    -FB utilizes the customized code generation format (customizable by the developer) to generate the new function
    If you need a "submitForm()" function and you want both a TextInput's enter action and a button's click action to call it, currently you're better off typing it all yourself, because auto-generation is going to put this long-named function that assumes you need 'event' passed to it. An event:MouseEvent parameter just gets in the way when you also want a TextInput's enter event to call that function, for example. Or perhaps we want to provide a more descriptive name to each handler (via dialog) without assigning IDs to each and every component: "datagrid1_changeHandler" or "button1_changeHandler" doesn't tell us what the function actually does. It's a basic coding best practice to name functions or methods after the actions they actually perform, and in a large application with complex forms auto-generated generic sounding function names are essentially useless from a maintainability standpoint.

    For anyone interested, I figured it out:
    to generate a CFC, you have to right-click a table in the RDS Dataview, then you can generate a CFC. You cannot generate a CFC from an AS class as described in the CF Builder help within Flash Builder.
    Adobe: it would be nice if this got fixed – and if someone there replied to posts like this. You do  know all this, don‘t you?

  • Problem with Web Service Model code generation

    Hello,
    I'm importing two different web services into the same web dynpro component, which both contains properties "allGroup2" of type "All2".
    This causes some problems with the code generation, first of all the Model-classes can't be generated because they don't know which of the two All2-classes to use. If I fix that problem (which can be easily done by adding the correct import statement) I still can't use the models in my web dynpro component, since it too doesn't know which of the All2-classes to use.
    Even though I can fix this by adding imports and fixing the code, it of course gets regenerated next time I rebuild the project, and my changes are lost.
    Does anyone know how to solve this?

    Apparently this is a known bug which is fixed in SP15.
    Regards mattias

  • Error in code generation for deleting table BUT000_TD

    Hi,
    Did anyone encounter this error while working on EEWB ?
    I created the project extension via EEWB and completed the wizard setting with the package (dev. class) value as $temp as I wanted to test it locally.
    One of the errors, that I got is:
    Error in code generation for deleting table BUT000_TD
        Message no. DA464
    Diagnosis
        This error message indicates that internal inconsistencies exist.
    Procedure
        Please consult SAP.

    Hi,
    As I mentioned in my previous post kindly check the consistency of the structure BUT000_TD.
    Regards,
    Sudheer.

  • Error during distribution for compiled code generation-Reply

    Hi,
    Looking at your error messages, it looks as though your build is failing during the code generation phase of an autocompilation. To determine why the code generator crashed, either look in the $FORTE_ROOT/log/forte_ex*.log files or don't use autocompilation and use fcompile.
    There are many reasons why the code generator could crash. Some of the things I've come across are running out of memory and trying to find invalid classes.
    If its the invalid class problem you'll find a message like:
    Generating code for partition BLTCustomWindow_cl0_Part1.
    ERROR: Exiting due to following exception:
    SYSTEM ERROR: Client partition FTCompile_cl0_Client was terminated by escaped
    exception. See the remainder of the error stack for more information.
    Class: qqsp_ResourceException
    Error #: [1001, 3]
    Detected at: qqrt_ForteExecAgent::LoadPartition at 1
    Error Time: Tue Aug 18 17:52:44
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
    9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1, taskId =
    [9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1.6]) in application
    "FTCompile_cl0", pid 28331 on node stardev in environment <unknown>.
    FATAL ERROR: Invalid class ProductBMServices.ProductSecurityMgrProxy
    (0x4ecd,0x19a)
    Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
    Detected at: qqcg_TRclass::SetClass at 2
    Last TOOL statement: method ForteCompiler.ProcessPGF
    Error Time: Tue Aug 18 17:52:44
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_Executor",
    (partitionId = 9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1, taskId =
    [9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1.6]) in application
    "FTCompile_cl0", pid 28331 on node stardev in environment <unknown>.
    The solution for this instance is to clean up the invalid classes using the c4tstdrv utility.
    c4tstdrv > setrepos star8
    c4tstdrv > setwork dmcompiledbuild
    c4tstdrv > open
    Type Service Flags Level
    err sh * 255
    trc rp 1 4
    c4tstdrv > findproj productbmservices
    c4tstdrv > cleanuprtclasses
    Removing extraneous RTclass ProductShootingLocationMgrProxy
    Removing extraneous RTclass PRTerritoryBaseMgrProxy
    Removing extraneous RTclass PRTerritoryMgrProxy
    Removing extraneous RTclass TalentBaseMgrProxy
    Removing extraneous RTclass TalentTypeMgrProxy
    Removing extraneous RTclass TitleTypeBaseMgrProxy
    Removing extraneous RTclass TitleTypeMgrProxy
    Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityBaseClass
    Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityBaseQuery
    Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityQuery
    Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityMgrProxy
    c4tstdrv > commit
    c4tstdrv > exit
    Integrate the changes to the workspace, start the build again and this should have cured the problem.
    However, its hard to know what the cause of your problem is without seeing the output in the log files.
    Good luck.
    Mark Carruthers
    20th Century Fox
    "Forte Consultants" <[email protected]> 01/22/99 08:35am >>>
    Hi,
    I'm doing application distribution for my application using a fscript
    script and am forcing compilation on 2 of my partitions.
    This I have been doing from quite sometime successfully. Recently I
    developed a new service and plugged it into my application for
    deployment.
    I'm successfully able to distribute & deploy the interpreted code. But
    I'm getting a long list of system errors when I try doing distribution
    for compiled code. And I see only one of the .exe generated instead of
    two because of which I'm unable to go ahead with installaion. I would
    appreciate if anybody let me know why this's happening ?. The following
    is the main chunk of this error list.
    Thanks in advance.
    --Anand Ramaswamy
    SYSTEM ERROR: Cannot resolve the distributed reference for an object of
    class
    (qqlo_Object) named (<Unknown>) for the reasons below.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 144]
    Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 10
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
    (partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
    taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
    "fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Can not initially communicate with the object named
    (Unnamed),
    which is supposed to be in partition
    (32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1).
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 140]
    Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::CheckAccess at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
    (partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
    taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
    "fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Attempt to send to unknown destination partition
    (32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1).
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 102]
    Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::SendMsg at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
    Distributed method called: qqdo_InternalMessage.<Message> (object
    name
    Unnamed) from partition "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router",
    (partitionId
    = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.2]) in application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
    (partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
    taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
    "fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Partition (32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1)
    no
    longer exists. The process associated with the partition probably
    terminated.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::CheckStarted at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
    (partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
    taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
    "fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
    failures
    shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
    try #2.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 54]
    Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:19
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
    (partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
    taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
    "fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: The load balanced router is disabled or has no members.
    This
    can happen if all of the members terminated or failed.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 161]
    Detected at: qqdo_LbRouter::Route at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:19
    Distributed method called: GenerationMgrProxy.GeneratePartitionCode
    (object name
    site/codegenerationsvc_cl0/codegenerationsvc_cl0-codegensvc)
    from partition "Fscript_cl9_Client", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614.2]) in application
    "fscript",
    pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
    failures
    shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
    try #1.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 54]
    Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
    (partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
    taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
    "fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Access to a load balanced router member (which is a
    service
    object) failed for the reasons below.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 162]
    Detected at: qqdo_LbRouter::Route at 2
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Distributed method called: GenerationMgrProxy.GeneratePartitionCode
    (object name
    site/codegenerationsvc_cl0/codegenerationsvc_cl0-codegensvc)
    from partition "Fscript_cl9_Client", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614.3]) in application
    "fscript",
    pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV
    Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
    Unnamed)
    from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Cannot resolve the distributed reference for an object of
    class
    (qqlo_Object) named (<Unknown>) for the reasons below.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 144]
    Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 10
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
    Unnamed)
    from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: This distributed reference was previously invalidated due
    to the
    reasons below.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 132]
    Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 3
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    INFORMATION: The connection to the partner was terminated by the
    Communication
    Manager for the reasons below.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::StopLocation at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    INFORMATION: Asynchronous Failure: Recieved a close from the network
    partner:
    Internet Location - Host: moosup.iroquois.com Port Number: 2504 Dot:
    193.1.11.26 %LINKDISCON, network partner disconnected logical link
    Event 4
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
    failures
    shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
    try #1.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [601, 54]
    Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    INFORMATION: The connection to the partner was terminated by the
    Communication
    Manager for the reasons below.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::StopLocation at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
    Unnamed)
    from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    INFORMATION: Asynchronous Failure: Recieved a close from the network
    partner:
    Internet Location - Host: moosup.iroquois.com Port Number: 2504 Dot:
    193.1.11.26 %LINKDISCON, network partner disconnected logical link
    Event 4
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
    Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
    32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
    [32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
    application
    "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
    IGTSDENV.
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Hi,
    If this INCLUDE is in a function group go the MAIN program and activate from there.
    Can you list out the include name?

  • FPGA Code Generation fails with error codes 7 and -1

    Hi all,
    I have been having a weird issue with my LV FPGA compilation in the last couple of days, no matter what I try to compile LV fails to generate the FPGA code files and returns with errors 7 and -1 and complains that the file is not found. This happens no matter what I am trying to compile even a VI with just a while loop. I followed the discussion forum here without any luck, also followed the NI article here and that did not help either. The error codes always get generated at the start of the Generating Intermediate files step #7 (out of 7).
    Attached to this post is a screenshot of the error I am getting (error -1 just says internal error and to contact NI support), bellow is basically the error I get for error code 7
    An internal software error has occurred. Please contact National Instruments technical support at ni.com/support with the following information:
    Error 7 occurred at Read from Text File in nirviGetInstantiation_cRIO-IDSel_Timer.vi->nirviGetInstantiation_cRIO-IDSel_Timer.vi.ProxyCaller
    Possible reason(s):
    LabVIEW: File not found. The file might have been moved or deleted, or the file path might be incorrectly formatted for the operating system. For example, use \ as path separators on Windows, : on Mac OS X, and / on Linux. Verify that the path is correct using the command prompt or file explorer.
    =========================
    NI-488: Nonexistent GPIB interface.
    C:\NIFPGA\compilation\cRioController_8-SlotFPGA_FPGA-TriggerTest_C06156E2\IDSel_Timer.vhd
    I tried to do some digging to see what could possibly be happening, and I noticed that LV is looking for the vhdl files in the wrong folder (see the line highlighted in red above), when generating the vhdl files, LV will place them inside the "source_files" folder under the compilation project, but for some reason it is trying to find them under the root folder not inside the source_files folder!!!
    Does anyone have any idea why LV would be looking for these files in the wrong subfolder? 
    Thank you,
    Aws
    Attachments:
    Code Generation Errors.png ‏35 KB

    Hi Aws_Khudhair,
    What version of LabVIEW are you using? And what version of the FPGA module? From what I found, it seems as though this is primarily an issue with LabVIEW 8.6 and 8.6.1.
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/A711119FE89E39E78625754E00075E92
    This forum also discusses a similar issue:
     http://forums.ni.com/t5/Real-Time-Measurement-and/FPGA-compile-errors-after-generating-intemediate-f...
    It may also be worth repairing/reinstalling the FPGA Module and the Xilinx compile tools.
    Catherine B.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • UML & Code Generation (RAD)

    Hey everyone,
    I'm evaluating Java IDE's right now and I'm working with a group that uses a tool called Popkin to do their design in UML. I'm trying to find a Java IDE that can import (via XMI) those diagrams to do the code generation.
    Rational and TogetherSoft have integrated environments that couple the code and design (As you code, the UML is updated and as you create UML, the code is updated, etc.)
    I'm wondering though, if you use something like JBuilder, how can you import the UML from another tool? Has anyone messed with Popkin before or tried to integrate something like this?
    Thanks,
    Will

    bump
    i don't care about this topic any longer, but need to give out a duke dollar, first one to respond wins!

  • UML code generation

    Hi,
    I'm developing an application of ~50+ classes in UML on JSE8 and use java code generation.
    The question is about aggregations.
    Navigable aggregations translate in java code to a class attribute, and to the corresponding getter/setters-methods.
    A non-navigable aggregation is not translated to java code at all.
    ( I would expect it should translate to an attribute, but without getter/setters.
    My understanding is, "navigable" means "navigable from outside the class". Correct?)
    So how can I model an aggregation, which translates to an attribute in java, without generating the getters/setters?
    And where can I find a comprehensive list of how elements in class diagrams are translated to java code?
    Where is the JSE8-UML-manual, which includes all these details about UML code generation?
    Thanks a lot for any useful hint!

    Hi,
    actually, the code generator is correct.
    A non-navigable association should not generate an attribute.
    Consider the example:
    class Order -> class Date
    You have navigation from class order to class date, but not otherwise.
    This means that, given a Order object, you can find it's associated Date.
    However, the inverse is not true: given a Date object you have no means of "navigating" or finding out which Order objects would have that date. This is what navigation means.
    This should be translated into something like this
    class Order{
    Date theDate;
    class Date{
    int day, whatever;
    //no ref to order-non navigable
    If navigation from both classes were possible, a much more complicated code would be needed. It would be something along these lines, considering a 1-1 association (a *-1 association would require multiple order references to be stored at Date, with yet more complications):
    class Order{
    Date theDate;
    void setDate(Date d)
    theDate=d;
    d.setOrder(this);
    class Date{
    int day,whatever;
    Order theOrder; //navigation to order
    void setOrder(Order o)
    theOrder=o;
    Care should be taken to ensure proper consistency between references (ie: the order in date should never be changed without making a corresponding change to the new order object).
    All this serves to show, you should use navigation sparringly (as needed) , otherwise you're just complicating your code more than you should.
    Greets
    Jorge

  • Generic oracle eway code generation error in Java caps 5.1.3

    Hi,
    I'm using an oracle eway for adding records to a table. I have a prepared statement in the otd. When I try to build the project I'm getting the following error. Could any one let me know how this problem can be fixed?
    com.stc.codegen.framework.model.CodeGenException: Generic Oracle eway code generation error(ERROR_CODEGEN_GENERIC_CODELET_GENERAL)
         at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateFiles(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:1860)
         at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.CodeGenFrameworkImpl.processCodelets(CodeGenFrameworkImpl.java:640)
         at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.CodeGenFrameworkImpl.process(CodeGenFrameworkImpl.java:1544)
         at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.process(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:405)
         at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.process(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:308)
         at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.traverseDeployment(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:268)
         at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction.loadCodeGen(DeploymentBuildAction.java:923)
         at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction.access$1000(DeploymentBuildAction.java:174)
         at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction$1.run(DeploymentBuildAction.java:599)
         at org.openide.util.Task.run(Task.java:136)
         at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Processor.run(RequestProcessor.java:599)
    Caused by: com.stc.codegen.framework.model.CodeGenException: Exception when generating OTD code ...Exception: javaClass: Oracle_std_otdOTD: Exception when invoke DB Codegen Task...Exception: Invalid parameter type: Class : [Std_insert_PreapredStat] Object: [Param1] Param Type : [DECIMAL].(ERROR_CODEGEN_DB)(ERROR_CREATE_OTD)
         at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateOtdJarFile(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:2045)
         at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateFiles(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:1756)
         ... 10 more
    Regards,
    Abdul

    hi...
    i too getting same problem..how did u reslove this...
    please help me out...
    thanks in advance
    KK

  • Mappings code generation : regular SQL / cursor PL/SQL

    Hi,
    When designing mappings, I fear that code generation can be potentially dangerous, because OWB automatically chooses the best method to generate the code (regular SQL or PL/SQL).
    I am looking for some examples where code generation for a mapping:
    - gives a regular SQL statement
    - gives a cursor-based PL/SQL
    - a small change in a mapping makes a regular SQL mapping to be transformed in a cursor-based PL/SQL
    Thank you
    Alexandre
    Message was edited by:
    Alexandre Abric

    I have not said that different modes executes at the same way – what the use to have different options if they actually mean the same, right? I have said that they produced the same result i.e. if you expect the mapping to insert 1000 rows from the source to the target – it will be done no matter which operation mode you choose.
    But by different ways. To keep it simple lets say that:
    set base mode will result in:
    insert into target (…)
    select … from source;
    row based will result in:
    begin
    for a in (select * from source) loop
    insert … into target
    end loop;
    end;
    Now lets assume that 5 rows from those 1000 you are going to insert, will break some NOT NULL constraint at the target.
    If you choose Set-base mode entire insert from select will fail resulting no rows is inserted into target. Audit trail will contain message like “constraint … violated” and that’s it. You will have to find bad records by yourself.
    If you choose Row-base mode – 995 rows will be inserted (depending on mapping configuration) into the target and 5 will be listed in audit trail with the same “ constraint violated” message.
    That’s why default operating mode is “Set based fail over to Row based”. That means OWB will try to execute mapping in the fastest way – set based, but if it fail, it will try again to accomplish the task by running in row base mode, providing complete audit trail fro bad rows.

  • NI Motion Assistant LabVIEW Code Generation Error

    Hello, the following is my current setup:
    NI PCI-7334 motion control board
    NI UMI 7774 splitter board
    3 x NI P70530 Drives
    3 x NI CTP12ELF10MAA00 Stepper Motors
    3 x Power supply units for drives
    LabVIEW 2010
    NI Motion Assistant 2.6
    Motion and Automation Explorer 4.7
    I have built a three axis motion system that I am trying to configure with labview. After verifying that everything was set up correctly, I opened MAX, updated the firmware to my motion control board, and intitialized the controller. Since then, I have created many basic programs using the Motion Assistant Software to test the movement of my device. Everything works fine while using the Motion Assistant software (I have three axis movement, multidirectional control, and can perform various straight line and arc moves). My problems begin when I try to use the code generation feature.
    When trying to use the code generation feature to output a labview diagram, I run into a problem where a dialog box pops up and says "Find the vi named ...."
    Some examples of the names that come up are: Configure Vector Space.flx, Vector Space To Control.flx, Motion Error Handler.flx.
    To be clear the program in Motion Assistant that I am trying to export to LabVIEW code is composed of two individual steps. One that tells X,Y, and Z motors to move forward 25 revolutions, and one step that tells them to move backwards 25 revolutions.
    I have made many other programs in Motion Assistant that run fine, but I always receive similar errors when trying to use the code generation feature to export to LabVIEW. Is there something that I can do to solve my problem?
    Thank you for your help.

    Hi Joe,
    I am using Ni-Motion Assistant 2.6, Ni-Motion 8.1, and Motion and Automated Explorer version 4.7.
    The code I posted is supposed to tell Axis 1 to move 40 revolutions at 400 rpm. It works fine in Ni-Motion Assistant but when I try to generate a LabVIEW diagram I receive the following error, "Find the VI named 'Motion Error Handler.flx'". I have had it search my directory, as well as the disk that I installed both LabVIEW and Ni-Motion but no luck. Thanks for your help.
    Attachments:
    1111.vi ‏9 KB
    1 axis movement.zip ‏8 KB

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mobile.Me mail not working with Outlook 2011

    Does anyone know what is going on with icloud email? It is not working this morning with my outlook 2011 this morning...

  • SQL 2008 R2 SP2 release to WSUS

    Hello, With the recent release of SQL 2008 R2 SP2 I was curious as to when Microsoft will be pushing it out to WSUS services? I've already done some testing in our environment with a manual download of it, but I was hoping to release it to my product

  • CFFORM VALIDATIOn

    Help I am having a major issue. I have a cold fusion mx7 server that has a number of sites on it. I have the same script running on two different domains on the same box. One site the form validation works and the other it doesn't. What's can it be?

  • Fetching from JMS Queue

    Dear Experts, I have the necessity to fetch messages from a JMS queue sequentially, not in a multithreading way. There is a configuration that allow me to do this ? I explain better, if I have 3 messages in a JMS queue, I should need that only when m

  • Source System Info

    Hi, Please let me know, how to find - When the source system was last restored? Thanks, Shantanu.