Code generation of an OMB generated splitter condition works incorrect

Hello!
I have generated a splitter condition with an omb script. the script works fine and the generated mapping looks also fine. but the generated code for the splitter condition is incorrect. it can be easily corrected be entering the splitter condition and there by pressing the ok-button without any changes of the splitter condition. i think the owb interpret the code in the splitter condition in this moment. afterwards the generated code is generated correctly.
does anybody know if there is an command in script language that makes the owb interpret the splitter condition without any manual intervention.
Thanks in advance!
Alex

Hi Arun,
Please check the Access Sequence in CRM system.
There should be some access sequence that is accessing condition table CUS701. Please identify and check for the fields in condition table 701 in ECC and CUS701. They both should have the similar fields and similar key fields. If not make them alike.
OR -
If table CUS701 in CRM is not holding any values or not being used, delete it from the access sequence.
Then run the load ... it should work..
Pls award point if it helps !
Thanks
Vikas

Similar Messages

Strange trace files after code generation! Are they generated by XText?

We have a DSL from which we generate C-Code (.c and .h files). The project build (especially on Windows platform) is very slow mainly due to refreshing and indexing (by Eclipse CDT) mysterious trace files.
Currently we don't know which part of the framework is responsible for generating these trace files (CDT, XText, Eclipse, whatever ...).
We were not able to analyse the content of the trace file, since none of the files appear at the file system.
The filename syntax is as follows:
For a C source code file "/project/src-gen/my_c_function.c" the following trace file gets generated: "/project/src-gen/.my_c_function.c._trace"
Does anybody know if XText is responsible for this ?

Hi
Sounds like a bad bug. I would progress in two ways.
Load EGIT as source and profile to see where the time goes.
Use Wireshark to see if unexpected Internet traffic is occurring quite
possibly with long timeouts.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 02/07/2015 06:58, Wolfgang Zeller wrote:
> Many thanks for your support so far.
>
> Debugging the code gave us some new information. Our generator does
> not create the trace files but the XText framework tries to access
> trace files for generated code during the build process. During this
> process, XText checks the existence of each trace file and if they do
> not exist, it simply continues.
>
> The problem is that we are using Git (EGit) for our projects. For any
> reason, EGit wants to refresh the Git status of the trace files and
> produces nice "hangs" (sometimes minutes for a single "non-existing"
> trace file).
>
> We have tried several patterns for the trace files in our .gitignore
> file with no positive effect.
>
> Is there anybody outside who can help us to make at least a small step
> forward?

NI Motion Assistant LabVIEW Code Generation Error

Hello, the following is my current setup:
NI PCI-7334 motion control board
NI UMI 7774 splitter board
3 x NI P70530 Drives
3 x NI CTP12ELF10MAA00 Stepper Motors
3 x Power supply units for drives
LabVIEW 2010
NI Motion Assistant 2.6
Motion and Automation Explorer 4.7
I have built a three axis motion system that I am trying to configure with labview. After verifying that everything was set up correctly, I opened MAX, updated the firmware to my motion control board, and intitialized the controller. Since then, I have created many basic programs using the Motion Assistant Software to test the movement of my device. Everything works fine while using the Motion Assistant software (I have three axis movement, multidirectional control, and can perform various straight line and arc moves). My problems begin when I try to use the code generation feature.
When trying to use the code generation feature to output a labview diagram, I run into a problem where a dialog box pops up and says "Find the vi named ...."
Some examples of the names that come up are: Configure Vector Space.flx, Vector Space To Control.flx, Motion Error Handler.flx.
To be clear the program in Motion Assistant that I am trying to export to LabVIEW code is composed of two individual steps. One that tells X,Y, and Z motors to move forward 25 revolutions, and one step that tells them to move backwards 25 revolutions.
I have made many other programs in Motion Assistant that run fine, but I always receive similar errors when trying to use the code generation feature to export to LabVIEW. Is there something that I can do to solve my problem?
Thank you for your help.

Hi Joe,
I am using Ni-Motion Assistant 2.6, Ni-Motion 8.1, and Motion and Automated Explorer version 4.7.
The code I posted is supposed to tell Axis 1 to move 40 revolutions at 400 rpm. It works fine in Ni-Motion Assistant but when I try to generate a LabVIEW diagram I receive the following error, "Find the VI named 'Motion Error Handler.flx'". I have had it search my directory, as well as the disk that I installed both LabVIEW and Ni-Motion but no luck. Thanks for your help.
Attachments:
1111.vi ‏9 KB
1 axis movement.zip ‏8 KB

Compiler Code Generation API

I would like to ask if you guys could make a Compiler Code Generation API. This would allow developers who would like to fine-tune details you guys probably don't have time to do, for projects we think its important on. Specifically with [Bindable] and {} code generation.
I would like to be able, and many others I'm sure, to turn Binding on/off (conditional binding), and add more complicated expressions, but that's currently impossible, unless I rewrote the core UIComponent and everything. Or unless I had access to the generated code through a nice API which shouldn't take you guys long at all: you already are generating lots of code and have templates for it, I would just like to ask for easy access to those templates.
Please let me know what you think. Thanks a lot for your time.
Lance

It's something we've thought about but it's not a high enough priority right now. Certainly a feature that folks could think about implementing on their own and contributing back though. It tends to be more complicated than you'd think though
Matt

Error during distribution for compiled code generation-Reply

Hi,
Looking at your error messages, it looks as though your build is failing during the code generation phase of an autocompilation. To determine why the code generator crashed, either look in the $FORTE_ROOT/log/forte_ex*.log files or don't use autocompilation and use fcompile.
There are many reasons why the code generator could crash. Some of the things I've come across are running out of memory and trying to find invalid classes.
If its the invalid class problem you'll find a message like:
Generating code for partition BLTCustomWindow_cl0_Part1.
ERROR: Exiting due to following exception:
SYSTEM ERROR: Client partition FTCompile_cl0_Client was terminated by escaped
exception. See the remainder of the error stack for more information.
Class: qqsp_ResourceException
Error #: [1001, 3]
Detected at: qqrt_ForteExecAgent::LoadPartition at 1
Error Time: Tue Aug 18 17:52:44
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1, taskId =
[9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1.6]) in application
"FTCompile_cl0", pid 28331 on node stardev in environment <unknown>.
FATAL ERROR: Invalid class ProductBMServices.ProductSecurityMgrProxy
(0x4ecd,0x19a)
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Detected at: qqcg_TRclass::SetClass at 2
Last TOOL statement: method ForteCompiler.ProcessPGF
Error Time: Tue Aug 18 17:52:44
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_Executor",
(partitionId = 9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1, taskId =
[9EA25A00-36FE-11D2-87C4-502F15BEAA77:0x1.6]) in application
"FTCompile_cl0", pid 28331 on node stardev in environment <unknown>.
The solution for this instance is to clean up the invalid classes using the c4tstdrv utility.
c4tstdrv > setrepos star8
c4tstdrv > setwork dmcompiledbuild
c4tstdrv > open
Type Service Flags Level
err sh * 255
trc rp 1 4
c4tstdrv > findproj productbmservices
c4tstdrv > cleanuprtclasses
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductShootingLocationMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass PRTerritoryBaseMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass PRTerritoryMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TalentBaseMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TalentTypeMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TitleTypeBaseMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass TitleTypeMgrProxy
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityBaseClass
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityBaseQuery
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityQuery
Removing extraneous RTclass ProductSecurityMgrProxy
c4tstdrv > commit
c4tstdrv > exit
Integrate the changes to the workspace, start the build again and this should have cured the problem.
However, its hard to know what the cause of your problem is without seeing the output in the log files.
Good luck.
Mark Carruthers
20th Century Fox
"Forte Consultants" <[email protected]> 01/22/99 08:35am >>>
Hi,
I'm doing application distribution for my application using a fscript
script and am forcing compilation on 2 of my partitions.
This I have been doing from quite sometime successfully. Recently I
developed a new service and plugged it into my application for
deployment.
I'm successfully able to distribute & deploy the interpreted code. But
I'm getting a long list of system errors when I try doing distribution
for compiled code. And I see only one of the .exe generated instead of
two because of which I'm unable to go ahead with installaion. I would
appreciate if anybody let me know why this's happening ?. The following
is the main chunk of this error list.
Thanks in advance.
--Anand Ramaswamy
SYSTEM ERROR: Cannot resolve the distributed reference for an object of
class
(qqlo_Object) named (<Unknown>) for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 144]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 10
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Can not initially communicate with the object named
(Unnamed),
which is supposed to be in partition
(32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1).
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 140]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::CheckAccess at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Attempt to send to unknown destination partition
(32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1).
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 102]
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::SendMsg at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Distributed method called: qqdo_InternalMessage.<Message> (object
name
Unnamed) from partition "CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router",
(partitionId
= 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.2]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Partition (32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x616:0x1)
no
longer exists. The process associated with the partition probably
terminated.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::CheckStarted at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
failures
shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
try #2.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 54]
Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:19
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: The load balanced router is disabled or has no members.
This
can happen if all of the members terminated or failed.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 161]
Detected at: qqdo_LbRouter::Route at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:19
Distributed method called: GenerationMgrProxy.GeneratePartitionCode
(object name
site/codegenerationsvc_cl0/codegenerationsvc_cl0-codegensvc)
from partition "Fscript_cl9_Client", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614.2]) in application
"fscript",
pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
failures
shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
try #1.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 54]
Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = 32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1,
taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Access to a load balanced router member (which is a
service
object) failed for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 162]
Detected at: qqdo_LbRouter::Route at 2
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Distributed method called: GenerationMgrProxy.GeneratePartitionCode
(object name
site/codegenerationsvc_cl0/codegenerationsvc_cl0-codegensvc)
from partition "Fscript_cl9_Client", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614.3]) in application
"fscript",
pid 4b81 on node MOOSUP in environment IGTSDENV
Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
Unnamed)
from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: Cannot resolve the distributed reference for an object of
class
(qqlo_Object) named (<Unknown>) for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 144]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 10
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
Unnamed)
from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This distributed reference was previously invalidated due
to the
reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 132]
Detected at: qqdo_ProxyMgr::ResolveOutGoingProxy at 3
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: The connection to the partner was terminated by the
Communication
Manager for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::StopLocation at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Asynchronous Failure: Recieved a close from the network
partner:
Internet Location - Host: moosup.iroquois.com Port Number: 2504 Dot:
193.1.11.26 %LINKDISCON, network partner disconnected logical link
Event 4
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
SYSTEM ERROR: This method invocation is being retried because the
failures
shown below and the fact that the dialog duration is MESSAGE. This is
try #1.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [601, 54]
Detected at: qqdo_Message::Failed at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: The connection to the partner was terminated by the
Communication
Manager for the reasons below.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqdo_PartitionMgr::StopLocation at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Distributed method called: qqlo_Object.<Message> (object name
Unnamed)
from partition "Forte_Executor", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615.12]) in application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
INFORMATION: Asynchronous Failure: Recieved a close from the network
partner:
Internet Location - Host: moosup.iroquois.com Port Number: 2504 Dot:
193.1.11.26 %LINKDISCON, network partner disconnected logical link
Event 4
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Fri Jan 22 10:44:15
Exception occurred (remotely) on partition
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0_Part1-router", (partitionId =
32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x615:0x1, taskId =
[32271CD0-4E62-11D2-AF29-9F40A9E1AA77:0x614:0x1.10]) in
application
"CodeGenerationSvc_cl0", pid 7487 on node MOOSUP in environment
IGTSDENV.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Hi,
If this INCLUDE is in a function group go the MAIN program and activate from there.
Can you list out the include name?
a®

FPGA Code Generation fails with error codes 7 and -1

Hi all,
I have been having a weird issue with my LV FPGA compilation in the last couple of days, no matter what I try to compile LV fails to generate the FPGA code files and returns with errors 7 and -1 and complains that the file is not found. This happens no matter what I am trying to compile even a VI with just a while loop. I followed the discussion forum here without any luck, also followed the NI article here and that did not help either. The error codes always get generated at the start of the Generating Intermediate files step #7 (out of 7).
Attached to this post is a screenshot of the error I am getting (error -1 just says internal error and to contact NI support), bellow is basically the error I get for error code 7
An internal software error has occurred. Please contact National Instruments technical support at ni.com/support with the following information:
Error 7 occurred at Read from Text File in nirviGetInstantiation_cRIO-IDSel_Timer.vi->nirviGetInstantiation_cRIO-IDSel_Timer.vi.ProxyCaller
Possible reason(s):
LabVIEW: File not found. The file might have been moved or deleted, or the file path might be incorrectly formatted for the operating system. For example, use \ as path separators on Windows, : on Mac OS X, and / on Linux. Verify that the path is correct using the command prompt or file explorer.
=========================
NI-488: Nonexistent GPIB interface.
C:\NIFPGA\compilation\cRioController_8-SlotFPGA_FPGA-TriggerTest_C06156E2\IDSel_Timer.vhd
I tried to do some digging to see what could possibly be happening, and I noticed that LV is looking for the vhdl files in the wrong folder (see the line highlighted in red above), when generating the vhdl files, LV will place them inside the "source_files" folder under the compilation project, but for some reason it is trying to find them under the root folder not inside the source_files folder!!!
Does anyone have any idea why LV would be looking for these files in the wrong subfolder?
Thank you,
Aws
Attachments:
Code Generation Errors.png ‏35 KB

Hi Aws_Khudhair,
What version of LabVIEW are you using? And what version of the FPGA module? From what I found, it seems as though this is primarily an issue with LabVIEW 8.6 and 8.6.1.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/A711119FE89E39E78625754E00075E92
This forum also discusses a similar issue:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/Real-Time-Measurement-and/FPGA-compile-errors-after-generating-intemediate-f...
It may also be worth repairing/reinstalling the FPGA Module and the Xilinx compile tools.
Catherine B.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

UML code generation

Hi,
I'm developing an application of ~50+ classes in UML on JSE8 and use java code generation.
The question is about aggregations.
Navigable aggregations translate in java code to a class attribute, and to the corresponding getter/setters-methods.
A non-navigable aggregation is not translated to java code at all.
( I would expect it should translate to an attribute, but without getter/setters.
My understanding is, "navigable" means "navigable from outside the class". Correct?)
So how can I model an aggregation, which translates to an attribute in java, without generating the getters/setters?
And where can I find a comprehensive list of how elements in class diagrams are translated to java code?
Where is the JSE8-UML-manual, which includes all these details about UML code generation?
Thanks a lot for any useful hint!

Hi,
actually, the code generator is correct.
A non-navigable association should not generate an attribute.
Consider the example:
class Order -> class Date
You have navigation from class order to class date, but not otherwise.
This means that, given a Order object, you can find it's associated Date.
However, the inverse is not true: given a Date object you have no means of "navigating" or finding out which Order objects would have that date. This is what navigation means.
This should be translated into something like this
class Order{
Date theDate;
class Date{
int day, whatever;
//no ref to order-non navigable
If navigation from both classes were possible, a much more complicated code would be needed. It would be something along these lines, considering a 1-1 association (a *-1 association would require multiple order references to be stored at Date, with yet more complications):
class Order{
Date theDate;
void setDate(Date d)
theDate=d;
d.setOrder(this);
class Date{
int day,whatever;
Order theOrder; //navigation to order
void setOrder(Order o)
theOrder=o;
Care should be taken to ensure proper consistency between references (ie: the order in date should never be changed without making a corresponding change to the new order object).
All this serves to show, you should use navigation sparringly (as needed) , otherwise you're just complicating your code more than you should.
Greets
Jorge

Generic oracle eway code generation error in Java caps 5.1.3

Hi,
I'm using an oracle eway for adding records to a table. I have a prepared statement in the otd. When I try to build the project I'm getting the following error. Could any one let me know how this problem can be fixed?
com.stc.codegen.framework.model.CodeGenException: Generic Oracle eway code generation error(ERROR_CODEGEN_GENERIC_CODELET_GENERAL)
     at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateFiles(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:1860)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.CodeGenFrameworkImpl.processCodelets(CodeGenFrameworkImpl.java:640)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.CodeGenFrameworkImpl.process(CodeGenFrameworkImpl.java:1544)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.process(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:405)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.process(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:308)
     at com.stc.codegen.frameworkImpl.model.DeploymentVisitorImpl.traverseDeployment(DeploymentVisitorImpl.java:268)
     at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction.loadCodeGen(DeploymentBuildAction.java:923)
     at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction.access$1000(DeploymentBuildAction.java:174)
     at com.stc.codegen.driver.module.DeploymentBuildAction$1.run(DeploymentBuildAction.java:599)
     at org.openide.util.Task.run(Task.java:136)
     at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Processor.run(RequestProcessor.java:599)
Caused by: com.stc.codegen.framework.model.CodeGenException: Exception when generating OTD code ...Exception: javaClass: Oracle_std_otdOTD: Exception when invoke DB Codegen Task...Exception: Invalid parameter type: Class : [Std_insert_PreapredStat] Object: [Param1] Param Type : [DECIMAL].(ERROR_CODEGEN_DB)(ERROR_CREATE_OTD)
     at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateOtdJarFile(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:2045)
     at com.stc.oracle.codegen.OracleEWayCodeletFactory$OracleEWayCodelet.generateFiles(OracleEWayCodeletFactory.java:1756)
     ... 10 more
Regards,
Abdul

hi...
i too getting same problem..how did u reslove this...
please help me out...
thanks in advance
KK

Mappings code generation : regular SQL / cursor PL/SQL

Hi,
When designing mappings, I fear that code generation can be potentially dangerous, because OWB automatically chooses the best method to generate the code (regular SQL or PL/SQL).
I am looking for some examples where code generation for a mapping:
- gives a regular SQL statement
- gives a cursor-based PL/SQL
- a small change in a mapping makes a regular SQL mapping to be transformed in a cursor-based PL/SQL
Thank you
Alexandre
Message was edited by:
Alexandre Abric

I have not said that different modes executes at the same way what the use to have different options if they actually mean the same, right? I have said that they produced the same result i.e. if you expect the mapping to insert 1000 rows from the source to the target it will be done no matter which operation mode you choose.
But by different ways. To keep it simple lets say that:
set base mode will result in:
insert into target ()
select from source;
row based will result in:
begin
for a in (select * from source) loop
insert into target
end loop;
end;
Now lets assume that 5 rows from those 1000 you are going to insert, will break some NOT NULL constraint at the target.
If you choose Set-base mode entire insert from select will fail resulting no rows is inserted into target. Audit trail will contain message like constraint violated and thats it. You will have to find bad records by yourself.
If you choose Row-base mode 995 rows will be inserted (depending on mapping configuration) into the target and 5 will be listed in audit trail with the same constraint violated message.
Thats why default operating mode is Set based fail over to Row based. That means OWB will try to execute mapping in the fastest way set based, but if it fail, it will try again to accomplish the task by running in row base mode, providing complete audit trail fro bad rows.

Enhanced Flash Builder Code Generation Functionality

For voting in JIRA:
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-27169
The code generation feature FB 4 currently has is only really useful for quick throwaway prototyping or very simple forms. The generation should allow you to configure formatting via default templates, AND optionally utilize a dialog box (similar to that used in refactoring but with a few extras) so that you can configure the contents of each generated function and provide appropriate function names according to coding best practices. For example:
-User initiates event handler generation
(Optional, if Codegen dialog is enabled)
-User is prompted with a dialog that allows them to customize the generated function name, and possibly specify whether they need an Event parameter passed to the function. (Default to NO event parameter, but this could be a pre-configured user option.)
-FB utilizes the customized code generation format (customizable by the developer) to generate the new function
If you need a "submitForm()" function and you want both a TextInput's enter action and a button's click action to call it, currently you're better off typing it all yourself, because auto-generation is going to put this long-named function that assumes you need 'event' passed to it. An event:MouseEvent parameter just gets in the way when you also want a TextInput's enter event to call that function, for example. Or perhaps we want to provide a more descriptive name to each handler (via dialog) without assigning IDs to each and every component: "datagrid1_changeHandler" or "button1_changeHandler" doesn't tell us what the function actually does. It's a basic coding best practice to name functions or methods after the actions they actually perform, and in a large application with complex forms auto-generated generic sounding function names are essentially useless from a maintainability standpoint.

For anyone interested, I figured it out:
to generate a CFC, you have to right-click a table in the RDS Dataview, then you can generate a CFC. You cannot generate a CFC from an AS class as described in the CF Builder help within Flash Builder.
Adobe: it would be nice if this got fixed – and if someone there replied to posts like this. You do know all this, don‘t you?

Code 'Generation' with DRY (don't repeat yourself)??

Hello I am new to the forum so please be kind,
I have recently gotten an internship with one of the offices with my University and am working a project (for a while now). I spend most of the day just getting all the classes assembled to be used (often a two day process) and what I would like to do is pass in a few parameters then have it generate the majority of the standard code that takes so much time to type out.
What I am referring to is Consructors/ Setters/ Getters and toString.
Parameters:
Class name
int first 5
double secondMost of this stuff is pretty standard, but I figured there was a template or something I could build to do much of this for me. Unfoturnaly the University teaches C++, so learning Java on my own is somewhat difficult at times.
Oh. I had found a wikipedia page about a design method called DRY, basically it pointed out that I could do just what I am wanting to do, but unfortunately I cannot seem to find an example or any detailed information about this method.
This is what I have rolling around in my head at the moment:
The use a bunch of strings and printf("%s, args) ...to build this entire page, then go in and enter the things that I couldn't generate.
I could see this working, but I had felt this would go against code resuability because when the class/things I would generate would change, I would have to do some serious changes to this to get it working again. (Maybe that is the point).
I would greatly appreciate some guidance on this, or pointed to more information.
Thanks

dajohnson1s wrote:
Hello I am new to the forum so please be kind,
I have recently gotten an internship with one of the offices with my University and am working a project (for a while now). I spend most of the day just getting all the classes assembled to be used (often a two day process) and what I would like to do is pass in a few parameters then have it generate the majority of the standard code that takes so much time to type out.
What I am referring to is Consructors/ Setters/ Getters and toString.
Parameters:
Class name
int first 5
double second
Most of this stuff is pretty standard, but I figured there was a template or something I could build to do much of this for me. Unfoturnaly the University teaches C++, so learning Java on my own is somewhat difficult at times.
First step is recognizing a pattern.
Second step, experience wise, is learning to recognize the difference between something that should be generated and something that shouldn't.
Third step is implementation.
Code generation should only be used if it can be insured that it eases the task now and in addition does not complicate the task in the future. That must include the possibility that the generation part will be abandoned so the generated code itself must be in such a state that it can be maintained.
Once you have a pattern then you must choose a way to represent the pattern as a 'source'. Sources can one or more of the following: text, xml, sql scripts, sql databases, existing source files, existing code bases, design document, pdf files. Anything that you can extract a definition from will work.
An example text file relevant to your task might look like this.
      Class: XxxMyclas
      Attribute: Count int
      Attribute: Name String.From that you create a standard compiler type idiom
1. Parse (read file and collect data)
2. Syntax (validate collected data, which might also be part of 1)
3. Generate (use data to generate new source)
Each phase can embodied certain complications (can not must). Some examples.
1. Parse - provide an xml to define data types.
2. Generate - provide a template file used to generate the code, define where the output goes, insure existing files not overwritten, etc.
Your description sounds like a one shot - in that you will not be generating every everytime but rather will generate it once and then modify it.
Oh. I had found a wikipedia page about a design method called DRY, basically it pointed out that I could do just what I am wanting to do, but unfortunately I cannot seem to find an example or any detailed information about this method.
The only general books I have found on the subject is one directed at Perl (Perl Munging) which is sort of related and one for .Net (or maybe java) but which is directed at a proprietary commercial product.
This is what I have rolling around in my head at the moment:
The use a bunch of strings and printf("%s, args) ...to build this entire page, then go in and enter the things that I couldn't generate.
I could see this working, but I had felt this would go against code resuability because when the class/things I would generate would change, I would have to do some serious changes to this to get it working again. (Maybe that is the point).
Code generation has its best usage if you can recognize a pattern and then implement it such that manual modifications are not needed. This however is tempered by the requirement that I first mentioned that the generated code must be maintainable by itself.

Code Generation and Optimization

hi,
we have been looking into a problem with our app, running in a JRockit JVM, pausing. Sometimes for up to a second or so at a time.
We enabled the verbose logging of codegen and opt.
And we see entries like:
[Fri Sep 3 09:51:38 2004][28810][opt ] #114 0x200 o com/abco/util/Checker.execute(Lcom/abco/util/;)V
[Fri Sep 3 09:51:39 2004][28810][opt ] #114 0x200 o @0x243c4000-0x243c7740 1186.23 ms (14784.88 ms)
So the optimization took 1186 ms.
Does this optimization happen in the main thread?
I.e., is the above message an indication that the app had to stop for 1186ms while the optimization occurred?
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated!
Also, does anyone have any more pointers to info on the code generation and optimization in JRockit?
I have only managed to find the following:
http://edocs.beasys.com/wljrockit/docs142/intro/understa.html#1015273
thanks,
JN

Hi,
The optimization is done in its own thread and should not cause pauses in your application.
The probable cause for long pause times is garbage collection. Enable verbose output for gc (-Xverbose:memory), or use the JRockit Management Console to monitor your application. Try using the generational concurrent gc, -Xgc:gencon, or the gc strategy -Xgcprio:pausetime. Read more on: http://edocs.beasys.com/wljrockit/docs142/userguide/memman.html
If you allocate a lot of small, shortlived objects, you might want to configure a nursery where small objects are allocated. When the nursery is full, only that small part of the heap is garbage collected at a smaller cost than scanning the whole heap.
If you need help tuning your application, you could make a JRA recording and send to us: http://e-docs.bea.com/wljrockit/docs142/userguide/jra.html.
Good luck,
Cecilia
BEA WebLogic JRockit

Code generation bug in C++ 5.0

The enclosed test program generates incorrect code
with C++ 5.0 when -g is not used.
The problem showed up in our production code
and concerns any reference counted smart pointer
implementation.
The test program is specifically written to demonstrate
the problem and diagnose a reference miscount.
With any optimization at all (without -g, and/or with
any level of -O including no -O) it generates
incorrect results. With -g the results are correct.
gcc compiles this correctly with any optimizations
selected.
// main.cc
// test program to demonstrate code generation bug in
// Sun WorkShop Compilers C++ 5.0
// bug exhibited as of 27th April 2001
// relevant patches applied:
// 107289-05 Packages: SPROcc
// 107390-12 Packages: SPROtl7x, SPROsclx, SPROtll7x, SPROcplx, SPROlgcx
// 107311-12 Packages: SPROscl, SPROtll7, SPROtlbn7, SPROcpl, SPROgc, SPROlgc
// 107357-11 Packages: SPROlang
// correct behaviour with CC -g:
// CC -g main.cc -o main; ./main
// incorrect behaviour with CC (no -g):
// CC main.cc -o main; ./main
#include <stdio.h>
class O {
public:
inline O() : m_refCount(0) { };
inline void ref() { m_refCount++; }
inline void deref() { m_refCount--; }
inline int refCount() { return(m_refCount); }
private:
int m_refCount;
class R {
public:
inline R() : m_object(0) { };
inline R(const R &r) : m_object(r.m_object) { if (m_object) m_object->ref(); }
inline R(O *o) : m_object(o) { if (o) o->ref(); };
inline ~R() { if (m_object) m_object->deref(); }
inline R &operator =(const R &r) {
if (this == &r) return(*this);
O *o = m_object;
if (m_object = r.m_object) m_object->ref();
if (o) o->deref();
return(*this);
inline R &operator =(O *n) {
if (m_object == n) return(*this);
O *o = m_object;
if (m_object = n) n->ref();
if (o) o->deref();
return(*this);
inline operator O *() const { return(m_object); }
inline O *operator ->() const { return(m_object); }
private:
O *m_object;
class B {
public:
inline B(const R &r) : m_ref(r) { };
inline const R &ref() { return(m_ref); }
private:
R m_ref;
R buggy(int notnull, B &b)
return(notnull ? b.ref() : 0); // BUG HERE
int main()
O o;
R r(&o);
B b(r);
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
R s;
s = buggy(!0, b);
printf("refCount: %d (should be 2)\n", o.refCount());

How do I file a bug report for this and get
a bug ID assigned?

Code generation problem with deployejb !

I am working with Oracle 8.1.5 and jdk 1.1.6,
when I am running the deployejb tool with the HelloWorld example of the demo directory, I have a problem with the code generation of the EJBHome and EJBObject:
deployejb -u ...
... [deployejb found HelloHome.class]
done
Generating EJBHome and EJBObject on the server...
An exception occured during code generation: Class not found : hello.HelloHome.class
Note my CLASSPATH variable is correctly set.
Can you HELP me ?
null

Adding -W2,-Rcond_elim to the existing flags does make both the small example and the original code compile correctly.
--David

Code generation don't work - please help!

Hi all
just installed flash builder 4.5 , then installed the flash builder 4.5.1 update patch
I've noticed the code generation features are not working
meaning for example if I write "fori" in a function then hit ctrl+space
it opens up an empty window with no suggerstions
same goes when I tried generating variables, functions, classes, getters, setters ect...
any idea as to why does it happen or what can I do about it?
cheers

Can you try a few things please -
1. Post the content of your workspace log here. Log can be found in <workspace location>/.metadata/.log
2. Post the steps you performed (starting from creating a new project) along with the .as and .mxml files. If you can't post your files here, please mail them to me at sameer[at]adobe[dot]com
3. Create a new workspace using File > Switch Workspace > Other. Create a new Flex project in the workspace and try these features.
Let me know your findings.

Code generation of an OMB generated splitter condition works incorrect

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for