ColdFusion and MS SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition

Trying to get ColdFusion (Developers Edition) to communicate
with MS SQL Server 2005 (Enterprise Edition). I have ColdFusion
running on username = admin; password = as set up when installed.
Have also tried setting up a user account with my Windows desktop
username and password in case ColdFusion needed to be logged on as
the same user as the SQL server. I have full admin permissions on
the SQL Server (with Windows authentication), and am the database
"owner" of the database on the server. In either ColdFusion login
case, when I try to "add a data source", with driver = Microsift
SQL Server, I get.....
Connection verification failed for data source: CFtoVolcano
java.sql.SQLException: [Macromedia][SQLServer JDBC
Driver][SQLServer]Login failed for user 'kewing'.
The root cause was that: java.sql.SQLException:
[Macromedia][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]Login failed for user
'kewing'.
Went to help files (troubleshooting area) and verified that
the local web browser (IIS) and Cold Fusion ARE running. Next step
takes me to "Change ColdFusion user account" which starts with
"Open Control Panel and select ColdFusion 8 App Server and click
Startup". I don't see that choice in MyComputer/ControlPanel. Not
even sure if this is going to ba another dead end anyway!!!
HELP! This shouldn't be this difficult! I'm not using some
weird version of SQL!

To use the default SQL drivers bundled with CF you need to
use SQL authentication (which is disabled by default I think) in
SQL Server 2005. If you enable SQL (mixed mode) authentication and
create a user you can then add the data source in the CF admin.
Alternatively, in order to use integrated windows
authentication with SQL server your CF service needs to run as
specific user. (It sounds like you've already done this) and you
will need to use Microsoft's JDBC driver
Driver download (MS JDBC Driver)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C47053EB-3B64-4794-950D-81E1EC91C 1BA&displaylang=en
Connecting with Integrated authentication (MS JDBC Driver)
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms378428.aspx#Connectingintegrated

Similar Messages

Compatibility of Toplink with SQL SERVER 2005 Enterprise edition

Hi All,
We have J2EE application developed using TopLink ORM, which is running on SQL server 2000 standard edition, and now we are planing to migrate the SQL server 2000 to SQL server 2005 Enterprise edition, so please let me know whether TopLink supports for SQL server 2005 Enterprise edition or is there any disadvantages.
Looking for your advice earliest
Thanks in advance.
Anand Siddacharya.

Yes, TopLink supports any SQL compliant database with a JDBC compliant driver.
As long as you have a JDBC driver that works correctly, I can't see any issues in the upgrade.
James : http://www.eclipselink.org

SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition Install Question ?

Hi,
Greetings for the day !
Can someone please tell me if i can install SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition on Windows Server 2012 R2 as i have to migrate from Windows Server 2008 ?
Please Help ?
Thanks !

Please refer the below link
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2681562/en-us
Minimum SQL Server version requirements for Windows Server 2012 R2 or Windows 8.1
Before you install SQL Server on a computer that is running Windows Server 2012 R2 or Windows 8,1 you must make sure that you fulfill the following minimum requirements, as appropriate for your situation:
SQL Server 2014
SQL Server 2012
SQL Server 2008 R2
SQL Server 2008
--Prashanth

Accessing v 7 dbase from sql server 2005 enterprise edition

Hi, i would appreciate any help with this issue i have come across when trying to access a version 7 dbase from within sql server 2005.
The error message is telling me that "This version of SQL server man studio can only be used to connect to SQL Server 2000 and SQL servers 2005"
I am new with SQL server so ill explain how im accessing it. I am connecting a server with sql 2005 on it via net support then through this trying to access another server with v 7 on it.
Thanks for the help in advance.

I see little purpose in resurrecting or "cleaning out" these threads. I cannot see that asking the OP if the problem still persists after 6 years has any useful purpose - and someone follows along shortly afterwards (since the thread has now risen
to the front of the forum) with a post that he then marks as an answer. It looks like there are over 900 threads in this forum alone that are unanswered - and I'll guess that this forum has significantly less volume than some of the others (9100 in tsql).
If MS wants to apply manpower to that, so be it. But immediately following a "is this still a problem" post with a suggestion/mark as answer does not seem to do much beyond generate volume. At a minimum it is inappropriate for someone
to propose one's own post as an answer regardless of their official forum position.
And if we follow this cleanup logic, what is accomplished if the OP never responds? Odds are that there will be none, so why bother? Alternatively, just actually mark the thread as answered with some sort of "cleanup, no response from OP" post. The
end result is the same.
Well, no one cared enough to answer his question 5 years ago. I want to change that. My time machine is broken right now, but I can still check to see if people still care about their issues. Because I care. Even if it's old. We should all care.
I understand that not everyone sees the value of asking about a 5-year old question. But what exactly does it hurt? How does showing I care about the person become a problem? We made you read it? Is that the problem?
Ed Price, Power BI & SQL Server Customer Program Manager (Blog,
Small Basic,
Wiki Ninjas,
Wiki)
Answer an interesting question?
Create a wiki article about it!

MS SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition

Hi,
We are developing a legal management product on SAP platform
We would have SQL Server to be used as a database for SAP ECC 6.0 in DEVELOPEMENT environment
The landscape of the planned development environment has a total of 8 servers. We understand that a separate MS SQL Server 2005 ( Question :- Enterprise / standard / Developer ??? ) edition is required for all the servers Each server will run its own instance. Each server will have 2 Intel Xeon CPUs with quad cores.
We understand that there will not be any users accessing the database directly. Instead, the SAP ECC software will create its own schema and users ( at most 4).
1) Please let us know which edition is best suitable for us for above scenario .
2) Does SAP ECC work on SQL Server 2005 Developer edition ?
3) Can we have one instance of SQL Server be used and multiple databases for dev, qa and prod be created from it
Your prompt response will much be appreciated
Thanks a ton !

1) Please let us know which edition is best suitable for us for above scenario .
SAP ONLY supports Enterprise edition.
2) Does SAP ECC work on SQL Server 2005 Developer edition?
No SAP willnot work on SQL Server 2005 edition.
3) Can we have one instance of SQL Server be used and multiple databases for dev, qa and prod be created from it.
Yes, technically it is possoble. But not at all recommended by SAP.
Regards,
SK

MS SQL Server 2005 - Express Edition?

I am interested to learn about database development for use
with CF dynamic development. Before I make any significant
financial investments I'm wondering if
MS SQL Server 2005
Express Edition is a reasonable place to start learning
about db development.
The Adobe ColdFusion 8 SYSTEMS SUPPORT MATRI X indicates
compatibility with: MS SQL Server 7.0, 2000, 2005 - Does this
compatibility include the FREE
MS SQL Server 2005
Express Edition ?
Does it bother MS that folks may want to use their db
solutions with a competitor's dynamic-development solutions? In
other words, are the compatible db products fully functional with
CF?

personally i like ms sql as i have always used it and am
familiar with it. I think mysql is the choice more for PHP
developers and I think CF works better with MS SQL. A definate
choice of preference though, i ilke the way i can install as many
instances as I like.
eg 1 for websites
1 for applications etc
there is merit in both but here in UK/Ireland mysql is not as
popular as MS SQL.

SQL Server 2005 Workgroup Edition compatibility for SAP B1 2005B

Hi Experts,
Please advise SQL Server 2005 Workgroup Edition can be used as the backend for SAP Business One 2005B.
Thanks,
Shakeel

Hi
Please go to:SAP service portal-product availability-supported platform-database platform
For 2005 B version we could get the following supportted information:
Microsoft?SQL Server 2005 SP2
- 32 Bit / 64 Bit (x64)
- Express (3), Workgroup (4), Standard & Enterprise Edition
Please read SAP Note 928839 on how to order SQL 2005 for upgrade purposes.
(3)SQL 2005 Express Edition is only supported with the SAP Business One Evaluation Versions and only in 32 Bit mode.
(4)SQL 2005 Workgroup Edition is only supported with Windows Small Business Server (SBS) 2003 and only in 32 Bit mode
For more detailed information regarding the supportted platform you could refer to the webpage from the above path.
Best Regards
Helen Sun
SAP Business One Forums Team

Installing Sql Server 2012 Enterprise edition on Windows 7

Hello,
I have a desktop with 1 TB Hard Disk and 8GB RAM. It has Windows 7 installed. I want this to be used as staging server at my work. I installed the SQL Server 2012 Enterprise edition. While installing I used service accounts as default when prompted
which I normally do while installing on a desktop. But now I want this to be used as a server where people can access this box as they do on a sql server machine .i.e. connect to server using SSMS and get to databases on the server and also remote
desktop into this machine. So, Is it fine to install with default service accounts?
Also how can I connect to this newly installed sql server box from another desktop using SSMS?
Thank You.

Hello,
Installation of SQL server 2012 Enterprise edition on Client machine(Win 7) is not supported( you can install ) .See below for Hardware and Software requirements for SQL Server 2012.You cannot claim support from Microsoft and I guess statging
is also important.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143506.aspx
Now to your main question.To connect
Makes sure Browser service is running
Make sure you make exception in firewall for SQL Server services and incoming connections
Make sure you specify correct instance name when connecting from remote
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition Compatability with Latest Operating Systems

Hi Team,
My client is using SQL Server 2000 Enterprise edition for the database in the Production.
Now,We are planning to load that data from SQL 2000 to SQL 2012 and test the functionality.
Can you please tell me on which operations systems the SQL Server 2000 is compatible to Install ?
like Windows Server 2012/ 2012 R2/ Windows 7/ 8 etc.
Thanks
Srikrishna

Installing SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2008 or later is not supported, but your question is about compatibility rather than support. SQL Server 2000 may work with the database engine but not with some other features and you'll probably need
to click through warnings installation. Proceed at your own risk if you want to go down that path.
I suggest you install on Windows 2003 for your migration testing to avoid obstacles. Not that support ends for Windows Server 2003 in a few months.
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Log File Issue In SQL server 2005 standard Edition

We have database of size 375GB .The data file has 80 GB free space within .When trying to rebuild the index we had 450 GB free space on the disk where Log file is residing.The rebuild index activity failed due to space issue.added more space and got the
job done successfully
The Log file has grow up to 611GB to complete the rebuild index.
version :SQL server 2005 Standard Edition .Is ther a way to estimate the space required for rebuild index in this version.
I am aware we notmaly allocate 1.5 times of data file.But in this case It was totaly wrong.
Any suggestion with examples would be appreciated.
Raghu

OK, there's a few things here.
Can you outline for everybody the recovery model you are using, the frequency with which you take full, differential and transaction log backups.
Are you selectively rebuilding your indexes or are you rebuilding everything?
How often are you doing this? Do you need to?
There are some great resources on automated index maintenance, check out
this post by Kendra Little.
Depending on your recovery point objectives I would expect a production database to be in the full recovery mode and as part of this you need to be taking regular log backups otherwise your log file will just continue to grow. By taking a log backup it will
clear out information from inactive VLF's and therefore allow SQL Server to write back to those VLF's rather than having to grow the log file. This is a simplified version of events, there are caveats.
A VLF will be marked as active if it still has an open transaction in it or there is a HA option that still requires that data to be available as that data has not been copied to another node yet.
Most customers that I see take transaction log backups every 15 - 30 minutes, but this really does depend upon how much data your company can afford to lose. That's another discussion for another day.
Make sure that you take a transaction log backup prior to your job that does your index rebuilds (hopefully a smart job not a sledge hammer job).
As mentioned previously swapping to bulk logged can help to reduce the size of the amount of information logged during index rebuilds. If you do this make sure to swap back into the full recovery model straight after and perform a full backup. There are
problems with the ability to do point in time restores whilst in the bulk logged recovery model, so you need to reduce the amount of time you use it.
Really you also need to look at how your indexes are created does the design of them lead to them being fragmented on a regular basis? Are they being used? Are there better indexes out there that can help performance?
Hopefully that should put you on the right track.
If you find this helpful, please mark the post as helpful,
If you think this solves the problem, please propose or mark it an an answer.
Please provide details on your SQL Server environment such as version and edition, also DDL statements for tables when posting T-SQL issues
Richard Douglas
My Blog: Http://SQL.RichardDouglas.co.uk
Twitter: @SQLRich

Different versions of SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition

Some of our business processes still use SQL Server 2005 and I need to install Developer Edition on my desktop.
I have following downloads available in my MSDN subscription (other than Itanium):
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - DVD (English) - 1 DVD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 64-bit Extended - 2x CD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 32-bit - 2x CD ISO
The desktop is running 64-bit OS, so I definitely want to install 64-bit version. However, I am not sure what this "Extended" version available on CD-s is. Is this the only 64-bit version in existence? Or are there 2 different 64-bit versions
- "Extended" and "Non-Extended" (with non-extended possibly available on DVD - I haven't downloaded any images yet)?

SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - DVD (English) - 1 DVD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 64-bit Extended - 2x CD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 32-bit - 2x CD ISO
The desktop is running 64-bit OS, so I definitely want to install 64-bit version. However, I am not sure what this "Extended" version available on CD-s is. Is this the only 64-bit version in existence? Or are there 2 different 64-bit versions - "Extended"
and "Non-Extended" (with non-extended possibly available on DVD - I haven't downloaded any images yet)?
SQL server 2005 is outdated so sorry if my answer is not to the point . First DVD version seems to me like installable which has both database engine and client tools present in it for installation
For second, SQL server 2005 installable was available in 2 CD's 1st CD was to install database engine/SSIS/SSAS/ SSRS features while second CD was to install specifically clint tools,books online legacy support . Its not possible to comment further without
looking at contents but I guess you can use 2nd one. CD 1 would have one part of installable and CD 2 would have second
And of course 3rd one is 32 bit of 2nd one.
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
My TechNet Wiki Articles

Installation of SQL Server 2005 Express Edition with Mobile Sales 5.0 SP07

Dear gurus,
I have the following question for you: is it possible to run Mobile Sales 5.0 SP07 with SQL Server 2005 Exp Edition? The specifications that I have found for both applications are:
- MOBILE CLIENT:
Installation of Mobile Client with CRM release 5.0 requires the installation of Microsoft .NET framework 1.1. (OSS note 879643)
- SQL Server Express Edition: Microsoft .NET framework 2. 0
Has anyone installed it this way?
Thank you in advance,
Judit.

Hello Judith,
It is possible to have 5.0 SP07 Mobile Client installed on machine with SQL Server Express edition. For more information on this, you may refer the installation guide for 5.0 SP07 (Software Pre-requisites section, SQL Server versions). However, please note, you cannot install 5.0 SP07 Mobile Development Workstation on Express edition due to the large repository size.
You may feel free to get back to me in case of any further concerns/comments.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Niranjan
(Reward points will be appreciated if you feel this issue is resolved).
N

Which .exe file I should choose to apply SP2 for SQL Server 2008r2 Enterprise Edition 64Bit

Hi All,
Which .exe file I should choose to apply SP2 for SQL Server 2008r2 Enterprise Edition 64Bit.
And what is the difference between below .exe files.
SQLServer2008R2SP2-KB2630458-x64-ENU.exe
SQLServer2008R2SP2-KB2630458-IA64-ENU.exe
Grateful to your time and support. Regards, Shiva

Good day
Shiva Shakthi,
I have change the type of the thread to a question, as this is a question :-)
please chose the right type next time. If you have a question then use a question thread (this is the default), and that will let you mark the answers that you get.
Have a nice day :-)
[Personal Site] [Blog] [Facebook]

Windows 8 Photo gallery can't start because Microsoft SQL server 2005 compact edition is missing?

I've installed & uninstalled MS SqlSever 2005 in my system (OS - Windows 8). When am try to access my photo gallery on desktop, I'm getting above mentioned error. How come photo gallery is dependent on MS SqlServer 2005 compact edition? Now,
I've installed & using MS SqlServer 2008.

ErikEJ,
I tried the link you provided and it points to the SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition that will not install in Windows 8. IS there some other package you are trying to send us to? I cannot install / run Photo Gallery because it needs SQL Server 2005 Compact
Ed and the latter when run reports it is not compatible with my operating system, ie., Windows 8 Pro, x64.
Can you help?
TigerWizard
Brenda W [email protected]; [email protected]

Upgrading from SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition [ENU] to SQL Server 2008 Express Edition OR HIGHER for Microsoft Security Compliance Manager

I have downloaded the MS Security Compliance Manager, which is in two parts: MS SQL Server 2008 Express Edition & the SCM. The install instructions state the the server needs to be install before the SCM. So as the install continues I get
an error message, which cancels the installation. So, I am trying to install SQL 2008 EE separate from SCM. My question is:
Can I upgrade from my current SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition [ENU]
directly to SQL Server 2008 Express Edition (or higher)?

So as the install continues I get an error message, which cancels the installation.
And which error message did you got?
SQL Server Compact Edition is something different then SQL Server Express (or Standard) Edition, you can't upgrade it as you asked for,.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

ColdFusion and MS SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for