Collection not happening for "missed cycles"

I'd seen a post back in Jan 5, 2008 by "WoofaJB" regarind the collection
cycle.
To quote: "When the Client connects to its assigned Collection Server
(set in a reg entry) it checks in. The server then works out if the
machine has completed a scan during that collection cycle (made up of
start date/time and duration) and if not then the server queues it up
for a scan. If the server is bus it may not send a scan command for a
while."
Well, that doesn't seem to be happening.
Collection is set By Week
Start Time of 1/1/2000 (currently end date shows 8/28/08)
Every 1 week on Thursday
Duration:
Scan for 1 Days
machine was last scanned on 7/18/08
But it's been powered on many times since then, just not on Thursdays.

If collection is done weekly, on Thursdays, and the duration is set to one day max, and if that workstation isn't powered up on Thursdays, then it will not be scanned. The workstation must connect to, and register with, a Collection Server during the scan duration to be queued for a scan. The Collection Server doesn't track down each workstation to see how long it's been since the last scan; it trusts that you're serious about the scan duration and won't perform scheduled scans outside that duration "slot".
To get that workstation to scan, you'll need to either ensure that it's connected on Thursdays or broaden the scan duration to include a time when that workstation actually is powered up.
-- Tim --
Originally Posted by KittyNoLegs
I'd seen a post back in Jan 5, 2008 by "WoofaJB" regarind the collection
cycle.
To quote: "When the Client connects to its assigned Collection Server
(set in a reg entry) it checks in. The server then works out if the
machine has completed a scan during that collection cycle (made up of
start date/time and duration) and if not then the server queues it up
for a scan. If the server is bus it may not send a scan command for a
while."
Well, that doesn't seem to be happening.
Collection is set By Week
Start Time of 1/1/2000 (currently end date shows 8/28/08)
Every 1 week on Thursday
Duration:
Scan for 1 Days
machine was last scanned on 7/18/08
But it's been powered on many times since then, just not on Thursdays.

Similar Messages

Some times firefox does not opens facebook and google pages and this does not happen for other sites. Iam Currently using windows xp and using 3.6.3 Firefox version.Please help.

Some times the fire fox does not open google and facebook pages but it does not happen for other sites. Iam currently using Windows xp and iam using Mozilla Fire fox 3.6.3 .Please help
== URL of affected sites ==
http://www.facebook.com,www.google.com

You can try a direct connection and select No Proxy in the connection settings.
You can find the connection settings in "Tools > Options > Advanced : Network : Connection"
Also do a malware check with a few malware scan programs.<br />
You need to use all programs because each detects different malware.<br />
Make sure that you update each program to get the latest version of the database before doing a scan.
* http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php - Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
* http://www.superantispyware.com/ - SuperAntispyware
* http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html - Spybot Search & Destroy
* http://www.lavasoft.com/products/ad_aware_free.php - Ad-Aware Free
* http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx - Windows Defender: Home Page
See also "Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked and [[Searches are redirected to another site]]

Automatic Batch Determination is not happening for New Sales Order Type

Dear Experts,
I have created a new sales order type ZBPY - For Free Sales, but automatic batch detrmination and batch pick up is not happening for new sales order type, but it is activated for all the other sales order types in Production Server, can any body let me know the steps how to map this new order type to batch management and let it behave like other order types.
Thanks in Advance.
Saravanan(EKS).

Hi Saravanan,
Kindly check the following steps for automatic batch determination.
1. First check the material is maintained with batch in the warehouse management.
2. Maintain new entry for search procedure for batch determination with the new created doc type.
3. Maintain new entry for automatic batch determination for sales order or automatic batch determination for delivery ( This depends on the business process of our client, whether they want to determine the batch with sales order or at the delivery level. check this and make new entry)
4. Create Batch using T.code MSC1N with proper date of manuf. and SLED.
5. Create Batch Search Strategy using T.code VCH1 with proper strategy type.
6. Maintain stock with active batch. check this with t.code LS26 or LS24.
regards
Ravishankar M

Archive is not happening for Sales Order

Hello Friends,
I want to archive sales order but it is not happening.
Following is scenario.
I have completed sales order cycle till amount posting
va01-vl01n-PGI-vf01-f-28
and document flow has shown it is done but still when i am running report S3VBAKPTS it shows document can not be archived billing document is not complete.
Help me for the same
Regards
BHavesh

Hi,
once the subsequenat document created for a sales order, you cannot archive that sales order.
reagrds,
Sumith

Balance carry forward not happening for new entity

Hello Gurus,
We added mid 2009 a new entity to be consolidated.
The balance carry forward assigns the last year results to retained earnings, this is the same accross all entities.
When executing the task in the monitor, there is no error message but it does no work, results end-up on a difference elimination item.
For all other entities, it works fine.
I wonder if there is a configuration that I overlooked.
Many thanks for you inpput.
Alex-

So you are saying that for all other consolidation units, the Balance CarryForward (BCF) was successful?
but for only one unit is was not successful?
- I suggest to you that one of the following has occurred;
1. there is no data against the balance sheet items for that unit (go to totals records to confirm YTD balance last year for all Balance Sheet items for that cons unit)
2. there is only data against a specific item that has been set to carryforward to the "elimination" item that you mentioned (check the BCF items to be carried forward confgiuration)
3. there is only data against Balance Sheet items that have been configured NOT to be carried forward (check the BCF config)
4. you have configured some items incorrectly as Item Type; Income Statement or Statistical instead of Balance Sheet.
5. You have missed the consolidation unit from the hierarchy for p1, 2010 (please also check the combinations if it is a matrix consolidation unit) so the BCF is not running for that unit at all
Checking these 5 should get you closer to the answer

Exchange Rate calculation not happening for Special GL in FAGL FC_VAL

HI ,
Exhcange rate calculation for all reconciliation accoout going on but for specilal gl not happens.
Could you please tell me whether system calculates or not for special gl or calculates only reconciliation account in FAGL_FC_VAL

Its going well

AD SSO not happening for Remote Users

Dear Members
I am having an issue with the NAC Deployment for Remote users (Users behind WAN Router)
Windows AD SSO (2008) is happening for LAN users successfullly, however remote users
are not able to do AD SSO.
it is ensured that remote users even in unauthenticated state can reach Active directory. there is no filtering
on any of the device across the path, for this communication.
When i use Kerbtray on the remote PC, i found no tickets at all.(i am logged in thru Domain)
what could be going wrong, is it delay (as they are wan user) which might attribute this issue, and if so, where are the needed parameters that can be tuned for AD SSO to happen.
Any help will ne highly appreciated.
thanks
Ahad

Hi Ahad,
As long as ALL the policies in Table 8-1 are configured for the Unauthenticated Role
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/configuration_guide/48/cas/s_adsso.html#wp1174219
the CAS should be out of the picture for what concerns the communication between the PC and Kerberos.
If the Kerbtray.exe output for a failing user is empty, it means that the unsuccessful users do not have any Service Ticket (ST) at all.
This points to an issue with AD (considering the fact that the CAS is already allowing all the traffic to/from AD).
The failing users are either unable to send the Ticket-Granting Ticket (TGT) to AD, or they are unable to obtain the Service Ticket (ST) from AD.
The CAS during this phase is neither performing any actions nor blocking any traffic, since all the communications to/from AD are already fully open in the unauthenticated role.
Regards,
Fede
If this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

Proper stock transfering not happening for intercompany

Hi Friends,
When I executed the scenario of procure to pay using replenishment for intercompany am getting the proper result step by step in IDES for standard document type (NB for PO).
Now I have created my own document type for PO and have assigned it to sites and sales area.
With standard document type (NB PO)
After executing replenishmenmt run I am getting standard PO type (NB) say xxxxxxxxx.
Now I created outbound delivery-->then picking and PGI. Now my stock is got reduced from supplying DC (say by 5 nos) and this stock is now under transit (can check thru MB5T). and total stock is also decreased by 5 nos.
Now to move this stock to receiving store I did GR against delivery and now after this stock in store is increased by 5 nos and hence total stock is also increased by 5 nos.
Now after checking MB5T i found there is no stock in transit.
Now I have tested this scenario for my own document type (say std PO type A)
Now std PO type A is successfully generated after executing replenishment run thru WRP1.
Now I created delivery then picking then PGI. Now I checked and found that stock from supplying DC is decreased by (say 5 nos) and stock in receiving store is increased by 5 nos in one shot and I could not find any stock in transit since its happening in one shot .
Now I need ur inputs if i am missing something becoz it shud happen in two parts first after doing PGI stock shud decrease from supplying DC (say for 5 nos)and that stock shud come under stock under transit (can check in MB5t) and that stock from transit shud go to receiving store once i will do GR against delivery.
Any pointers.
Regards
Ashutosh

Hi,
It seems that for your Site for the stock transfer order the "One-step Stock transfer" is ACTIVE. kindly remove the same and u will have the desired result.
Jonk

Challan mapping not happening for employees belonging to certain per. area

Hi,
we are facing a problem with challan mapping for employees belonging to certain personnel areas.
For other it is happening correctly.
Any suggestion for the above issue?
thanks,
Ayyaps

Hi,
Check the feature 40ECC for the Personnel Areas for which challan mapping is not being done. The TAN returned through this feature should be same as the one used in the second screen of challan mapping. If both the TAN matches, then only you will be able to map challan with the employees.
VK

BP replication not happening for a particular sales area.

The BP's created for one particular sales area are not getting replicated into CRM, though before sometime it was happening.
The BP with the "general data", and "role of sold to party" only flows but not with the sales area. There is no BDoc error in the SMW01 either. While displaying BP for the role of sold to party, it shows "Sold-to-party(maintained)" but the sales area entries though maintained for this sales area in the ECC, do not flow to the CRM.
However for other sales areas it flows.
Where should I look to resolve this situation. All entries in PPOMA etc are rightly made and untouched.
Thanks and regards,
Tariq

Hi
The BP's created for one particular sales area are not getting replicated into CRM, though before sometime it was happening.
DJ>> Hope the required sales area is available in CRM.
The BP with the "general data", and "role of sold to party" only flows but not with the sales area. There is no BDoc error in the SMW01 either. While displaying BP for the role of sold to party, it shows "Sold-to-party(maintained)" but the sales area entries though maintained for this sales area in the ECC, do not flow to the CRM.
DJ>> Please check the following -
1. Create a BP in CRM (with the sold-to party role) with the required Sales area and see if this customer when replicated to ECC has the relevant Sales Area. Ideally it should get replicated if all you middleware settings are fine.
2. See you have not set a filter for a specific Sales Area and becuase of that BP is getting replicate but not the sales area.
Hope this will help
Regards

Basic Pay Split not happening for Mid Month Joining

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a problem running a payroll where the employee who is hired at the middle of the month the net pay should be half. But in my case the employee is getting a full month pay.
I have Hired an employee on 20th of February.
Planned working Time Status "0" No time Evaluation
My Payroll Area is Monthly
The Payroll Period is 25th to 24th of next month
Pay date is 27th
I am running payroll on 24th Feb the RT displays the net payable amount for the full month instead of 5 days Payment which is from 20 Feb to 24 feb.
I have set the start dates in the following infotypes 0000, 0001, 0002, 0007, 0008 as Start Date: 20th February current year.
I have assigned all my wage types the following Processing class:
PRCL 1 Specification 3 WType included in valuation basis /001 and /002
PRCL 10 Specification 1 Reduction with factor /801
And PRCL 30 and 41 also are assigned appropriate specifications.
Please guide how can I do it.
Best Regards,
KPJ

Thanks Surisetti I resolved myself..if you could throw some light as the amount is not being calculated exactly..
The month has working hrs 192.
the amount in /001= 66 and /002=52
The base salary is 10000 SAR
and the TSSOLL= 39.5 for days from 20 Feb to 24 Feb
So, Amount will be calculated /001 mutilply TSSOLL i.e (66 X 39.5)or
/002 Mutiply 39.5 i.e (52 X 39.5)
How would that be calculated...
In general when base is 10000 SAR and monthly working hrs are 192
10000 Divide by 192 is equal to 52 which is exactly equal to /002
and now worked hrs in period 20 feb to 24 feb are 39.5
So, basic should be (52 X 39.5)= 2,057 SAR
The amount calculated in system is different ...could u please throw some light why its not calculating exact amount to be paid..
Thanks & Regards,
KPJ

Substitution not happening for Asset Master

Hi Experts,
I have created a substitution rule in OACS to update Depreciation key based on the Evaluation Group while creating Asset Master Record. After this when i simulate the system was giving value for the LVA Key as designed but however when i run the actual transaction it does not populate. Currently the substitution is working for the other steps created under the same substitution rule for other fields in Asset Master record.
Also let me know if the default made at Asset Class level for the depreciation key has any impact on this substitution
Regards
Zehran

Also i notice that when i create the asset in the test system with expert total trace, the substitution is triggered when the values is entered in the Time Dependent tab and the input for the substitution is available in the allocation tab. Even if the data is entered in allocation tab first, the system is triggering the expert trace with TRUE condition for the substitution but the values are not populated in the depreciation tab for the depreciation key
Regards
Zehran

Inbound processing is not happening for XMG integration

Currently our project deals with B2B and XMG integration
We are able to send outbound messages to B2B from XMG successfully.
For Inbound messages
1. B2B is picking up payload
2. Identifying Agreement
3. Decrypting and verifies digital signature
but could not deliver the message to ECX_INQUEUE
Log
====
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:292: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.custom.CustomDocumentPlugin:getIdentificationExpression Enter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:293: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.custom.CustomDocumentPlugin:getIdentificationExpression idexp = /*[local-name()='envelope']/*[local-name()='itemSyncResponse']
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:293: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.custom.CustomDocumentPlugin:getIdentificationExpression Exit
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:307: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.custom.CustomDocumentPlugin:processIncomingDocument Exit
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:308: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:XXX: processIncomingMessage setting seq numbers
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:308: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage Call Incoming Request Processor
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:308: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:incomingRequest Enter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:309: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:incomingRequest TransportBindings created
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:309: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:incomingRequest Create a Message Table Row for Request message with message state Continue Processing
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:309: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow Enter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:312: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:312: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryExchangeProtocolRevision
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:316: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryExchangeProtocolRevision
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:316: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:317: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryDocumentProtocolRevision
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:319: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryDocumentProtocolRevision
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:322: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:322: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: createDataStorage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:327: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: createDataStorage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:333: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow toparty name Oracle Development
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:333: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow toparty type and value AS2 Identifier0060974050142
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:334: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:334: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryTradingPartnerIdentificationType
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:336: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryTradingPartnerIdentificationType
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:337: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:364: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: createBusinessMessageReceiverInter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:367: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: createBusinessMessageReceiverInter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:367: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow Enter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:373: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:374: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: createDataStorage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:377: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: createDataStorage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:381: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow msgInfo.id = <[email protected]_te>
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:382: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:
** DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow:tip_wireMsg protocolCollabID = null
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:383: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:383: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: updateWireMessage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:387: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: updateWireMessage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:387: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:continueRequest Collaboration Control not required ..continuing Request processing
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:388: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:deliverMessageToDestination Enter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:388: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:deliverMessageToDestination deliver message to destination. protocol is XMLGateway Queues
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:388: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:deliverMessageToDestination deliver message to XMLGW2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:389: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : Wed Feb 06 07:04:32 PST 2008 Converting B2B message to ECX message..
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:389: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : Wed Feb 06 07:04:32 PST 2008 Inbound - B2BtoECX - Enter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:389: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : Wed Feb 06 07:04:32 PST 2008 B2B Message -2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:389: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : COLLABORATION_NAME : null2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:390: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : ACTION_NAME : M4U_SRC_ITEM_SYNC_RESP
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:390: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : DOCUMENT_TYPE : M4U_SRC_ITEM_SYNC_RESP
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:390: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : DOCUMENT_TYPE_REVISION : 1.0
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:390: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : SOURCE_NAME : 1Sync-AS2
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:391: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : DESTINATION_NAME : Oracle Development
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:392: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : PAYLOAD : <Payload Goes Here>
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:393: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) : Wed Feb 06 07:04:32 PST 2008 ECX Message -
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:393: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:handleAppMessageRetry Could not deliver the message; exception message is null2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:393: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:handleAppMessageRetry No application side retry
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:617: Thread-10: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50903: Message "8C57CE13117EF46D5340000013A02150-1" retry count is zero
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler.handleAppMessageRetry(MessageHandler.java:325)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler.deliverMessageToDestination(MessageHandler.java:275)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.putMsg(Request.java:589)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.continueRequest(Request.java:428)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.incomingRequest(Request.java:357)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1693)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2007)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:1939)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:1897)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:463)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:335)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:618: Thread-10: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50903: Message "8C57CE13117EF46D5340000013A02150-1" retry count is zero
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler.handleAppMessageRetry(MessageHandler.java:325)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler.deliverMessageToDestination(MessageHandler.java:275)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.putMsg(Request.java:589)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.continueRequest(Request.java:428)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.incomingRequest(Request.java:357)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1693)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2007)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:1939)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:1897)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:463)
at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:335)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:621: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:Runtime
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:621: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: updateBusinessMessage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:626: Thread-10: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: updateBusinessMessage
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:627: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:updateMsgError(3 params) Exit
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:627: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:notifyApp retry value <= 0, so sending exception to IP_IN_QUEUE
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:627: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Enter
2008.02.06 at 07:04:32:630: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) notifyApp:notifyApp Enqueue the ip exception message:
<Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<correlationId>null</correlationId>
<b2bMessageId>8C57CE13117EF46D5340000013A02150-1</b2bMessageId>
<errorCode>AIP-50903</errorCode>
<errorText>Message "8C57CE13117EF46D5340000013A02150-1" retry count is zero</errorText>
<errorDescription>
<![CDATA[Machine Info: (ap6003idmz.us.oracle.com)^M
Message "8C57CE13117EF46D5340000013A02150-1" retry count is zero ]]>
</errorDescription>
<errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
</Exception>
Following doc - protocol parameters are set for failed message
=================================================
Identification Expression (XPath) for XML Document : /*[local-name()='envelope']/*[local-name()='itemSyncResponse']
Document Routing ID : b2buser1
Inbound Process Type : M4U_SRC
Inbound Process Subtype : ITEM_SYNC_RESPONSE
Outbound Process Type : M4U_SRC
Outbound Process Subtype : ITEM_SYNC_RESPONSE
Inbound Party Code : Internal
DTD/XSD Namespace Conversion :NONE
Please advise us.
Thanks
Praveen

Hello,
Plese make sure that the ECX queues are present and are appropriately refferred from the Delivery Channel in B2B UI. I will request one of my team memeber to work with you if the issue still persists.
Rgds,Ramesh

Round Robin was not happening for my cluster with WebLogic Proxy Plugin

          Hi,
          I configured my cluster with software load balancer, HTTPClusterServlet. By default,
          it is load balancing with Round Robin Algorithm. That means one HTTP request
          goes to server1, and the other HTTP request goes to server2. However, it is not
          what I can see no matter for the requests in one HTTP session or not.
          Say I open two browser, and log into my application with two different users,
          one is "cyang", the other is "xpression". Then the HTTP request (for servlet/jsp)
          from two browsers always go to the same server1, server2 is not invoked at all.
          I did see one time, with only one session (one browser with "xPression" user log
          in), the most requests go to server1, suddenly I am brough into log in page, then
          I noticed that the request for "xPression" moved to server2 although server1 is
          still alive. Therefore, at most, I can say it is "Random", rather than "Round
          Robin".
          What is the real meaning for HTTP servlet/jsp load balancing algorithm? Does
          Round Robin mean request go to each server in turns? Does it have to be different
          session or it can be within one session?


It should be sticky. If not, then bug / config error.
          Peace,
          Cameron Purdy
          Tangosol, Inc.
          http://www.tangosol.com/coherence.jsp
          Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Replicated Cache for Weblogic
          "Carole Yang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]...
          >
          > Thanks. Yeh, with two kind of browsers, I do see the request goes to
          different
          > servers.
          >
          > That goes back to the original question. Does "Round Robin" here fall
          into the
          > scope of a HTTP session. However, that is not always true for my tests.
          Sometimes,
          > HTTP request just randomly goes to another server while in the same HTTP
          session.
          > It is not sticky to one particular server during one session.
          >
          >
          >
          > --Carole
          >
          >
          > "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
          > >Has to be different sessions to go to different machines.
          > >
          > >Best way to test is to run one session in IE and the other in Mozilla
          > >or
          > >Netscape.
          > >
          > >Peace,
          > >
          > >Cameron Purdy
          > >Tangosol, Inc.
          > >http://www.tangosol.com/coherence.jsp
          > >Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Replicated Cache for Weblogic
          > >
          > >
          > >"Carole Yang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          > >news:[email protected]...
          > >>
          > >> Hi,
          > >>
          > >> I configured my cluster with software load balancer,
          HTTPClusterServlet.
          > >By default,
          > >> it is load balancing with Round Robin Algorithm. That means one HTTP
          > >request
          > >> goes to server1, and the other HTTP request goes to server2. However,
          > >it
          > >is not
          > >> what I can see no matter for the requests in one HTTP session or not.
          > >>
          > >> Say I open two browser, and log into my application with two different
          > >users,
          > >> one is "cyang", the other is "xpression". Then the HTTP request (for
          > >servlet/jsp)
          > >> from two browsers always go to the same server1, server2 is not invoked
          > >at
          > >all.
          > >>
          > >> I did see one time, with only one session (one browser with "xPression"
          > >user log
          > >> in), the most requests go to server1, suddenly I am brough into log
          > >in
          > >page, then
          > >> I noticed that the request for "xPression" moved to server2 although
          > >server1 is
          > >> still alive. Therefore, at most, I can say it is "Random", rather
          > >than
          > >"Round
          > >> Robin".
          > >>
          > >> What is the real meaning for HTTP servlet/jsp load balancing algorithm?
          > >Does
          > >> Round Robin mean request go to each server in turns? Does it have
          > >to be
          > >different
          > >> session or it can be within one session?
          > >
          > >
          >

MIRO should not happen for Movement Type 107

Dear All,
We have a peculiar scenario/requirement fulfilled by business and we have done almost all but getting stuck in below area:
We have developed a output type in order to automatically post Mat Doc with Movement Type 107 once the user reverses Material Document with Mvt Type 103, This as per a business requirement. That means when 104 will be done for a Mat Doc with Mvt Type 103, "PO History Tab" will display in following order:
103 > 104 > 107
After 107, user will reverse it with Mvt Type 108 and specific G/L accounts will be hit which will update the "PO History" as:
103 > 104 > 107 > 108
Now issue is we want MIRO to be possible for Mvt Type 108, not for Mvt Type 107 else it will create a vendor liability twice and business will end up paying amount to vendor twice.
How can this be achieved?
Your sound suggestions are most welcome.
Regards
Samier Danish

No replies
Regards
Samier Danish

Collection not happening for "missed cycles"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for