Collection plan going to error on cloned Test server

Collection plan going to followin error on cloned Test serverlog, while it is workng fine on our Production server:
Concurrent Manager encountered an error while attempting to start your immediate concurrent program &PROGRAM. Routine &ROUTINE received a return code of failure.
Kindly help me in this regards.
Thanks

Collection plan going to followin error on cloned Test serverlog, while it is workng fine on our Production server:Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
Concurrent Manager encountered an error while attempting to start your immediate concurrent program &PROGRAM. Routine &ROUTINE received a return code of failure.Please check the CM log file for details about the error.
Thanks,
Hussein

Similar Messages

  • File Not Found error on local test server

    Hello all,
    I have no idea what happened, but my local test server went
    from working fine to not working at all. When I go to test a page
    locally, I get this error:
    The requested URL /[filename].php was not found on this
    server
    I did not change any of the configuration files, I can load
    and use phpMyadmin, but absolutely can not test a page locally, not
    even something as basic as David Powers' phptest.php page which is
    a whopping 2 lines of code to verify the php version on my
    computer.
    PLEASE, I beg of you, if you have any suggestions, PLEASE
    throw them my way. I am completely stonewalled from further
    development because of this issue. PLEASE HELP!
    Sincerely,
    wordman

    Is that a root relative link? If you aren't using virtual
    hosts those won't
    work.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "Wordman-GL" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:gpmkjg$rna$[email protected]..
    > Hello all,
    >
    > I have no idea what happened, but my local test server
    went from working
    > fine
    > to not working at all. When I go to test a page locally,
    I get this error:
    >
    > The requested URL /[filename].php was not found on this
    server
    >
    > I did not change any of the configuration files, I can
    load and use
    > phpMyadmin, but absolutely can not test a page locally,
    not even something
    > as
    > basic as David Powers' phptest.php page which is a
    whopping 2 lines of
    > code to
    > verify the php version on my computer.
    >
    > PLEASE, I beg of you, if you have any suggestions,
    PLEASE throw them my
    > way. I
    > am completely stonewalled from further development
    because of this issue.
    > PLEASE HELP!
    >
    > Sincerely,
    >
    > wordman
    >

  • WIP collection plan trigger

    Customer would like to apply a quality inspection hold between 140 to 150 sequence number and for the star items / config items that are configured using ATO Model “INTELLIX BMT 300 UNIT”.
    Please help us in setting a collection trigger for above requirement.

    Collection plan going to followin error on cloned Test serverlog, while it is workng fine on our Production server:Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
    Concurrent Manager encountered an error while attempting to start your immediate concurrent program &PROGRAM. Routine &ROUTINE received a return code of failure.Please check the CM log file for details about the error.
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Error during generate test plan

    I'm trying to generate a test plan in Microsoft test Manager 2013 but during the criation of the template always appears the same error.
    the error is "Application detected an unexpected fault
                       Running transformation: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
                      atMicrosoft.VisualStudio.TextTemplating04F88A763EC75D0A56EFDCF2B8809A952EF3E8E3357BFF2D9D4011312F
                     1B1B7156AE7547C446AFAB5B0446F4365E959CE585F7E56BFF574A1A1FDA6152DD705D.
          GeneratedTextTransformation.TransformText() in c:\Users\2363\AppData\Local\Temp\testplan\TestPlanSection.tt:line 151"
    Some test cases are active, and i'm trying generate a documente too know what expect.
    Thank you foll the help you can give.

    Hi,
    How do you generate test plan in MTM, please provide the detail steps. Do you clone test plan in MTM? What’s the version of your TFS?
    # Copying and cloning test suites and test cases (Clone a test plan and its test case section)
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh543843.aspx#sectionToggle3
    On the other hand, please try to clean TFS cache and try again. (Delete the cache folder, which path like C:\Users\[user name]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Team Foundation\5.0)
    Regards
    Starain
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Error While Genrating Test Report in Test Plan Management

    Hi Guru's
      I am getting an authorization error while generating test report via STWB_info.
      Just i selected the test package and while click the test report i am getting this error.
    Error during authorization check
    Message no. TWBHS540
    Guide Me to solve this issue
    thanks in advance
    regards
    Anandh

    Hi,
    Please try the following:
    Start transaction SMGENDOC03
    Do not change anything but just hit the save button.
    Afterwards restart transaction STWB_2 and try again to generate again.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers
    SH

  • Thru Collective conf goods posting error neds to be avoided going to COGI

    Dear,
    While doing collective confirmation along with Goods posting, If the stock is deficit then error posting generating in COGI. We need to stop error posting in IW42 itself not allowing to post error in COGI. Customisation is already done for Termination for Incorrect Goods Movement.

    Dear,
    When you post via the collective entry as well as when updating dependent goods movements of the collective order processing, no error handling is provided in Standard SAP. If you do this with IW41 it will work for you. If you set In Customizing of the confirmation (Transaction OPK4), I set error handling in case there are any incorrect goods movements.
    Transactions IW41 and IW42 are both considered to be completely separate transactions. In the individual completion confirmation, a linkage occurs between goods movement and completion confirmation that you cannot find in the overall completion confirmation.
    For this reason, the function  "Incorrect good movement"' leads to a termination in Transaction IW41 and not in Transaction IW42.
    Work around for it schedule the program CORUAFFW in background  using SM36 on hourly basis so it will clear the COGI post processing error.
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Multiple Receiving Quality Collection Plans

    I am trying to setup collection plans to capture results when receiving a PO. I am able to see only 1 collection plan and i don't see my new collection plan, is there any profile option or setup to enable multiple receiving collection plans ?
    Thanks,
    Aarti

    Hi,
    We have an OPM template ( TEMPLATE OPM RECEIVING INSPECT ) from which you have to build your own collection plan.
    I have some old notes from the past which I will share with you here.
    RECEIVING INSPECTION AND OPM QUALITY AND COLLECTION PLAN ERROR DEBUGGING INFORMATION
         Steps Required Prior to Executing Test
    1.     In Oracle Quality, new Quality collection elements and collection plan have been seeded.
    2.     In Oracle Inventory, item is Process Quality enabled.
    3.     In OPM Quality System Parameters, set Lot Optional to Yes and Delayed Lot Entry to No.
    4.     In OPM Quality, optionally set up an OPM sampling plan for incoming inspection.
    5.     In OPM Quality, create an approved item specification and a supplier specification validity rule associated with the sampling plan.
    6.     a) In Oracle Quality, create a collection plan (e.g. call it OPM RECEIVING INSPECTION and copy elements from the seeded collection plan from 1 above called TEMPLATE OPM RECEIVING INSPECT ) with seeded collection elements that correspond with the OPM Quality sample group.
    The Collection Plan will be setup by the end-user with Collection Triggers so that, only for specific conditions allowed by the collection triggers for the Inspection transaction, will this collection plan be applicable during RCV Transaction (aka enabling)
    .e.g. for Quality Collection Transaction. ‘Inspection Transactions (Oracle Purchasing) set up Collection trigger of ‘Item’ Condition ‘equals’ and From value of ‘9010’.
    7.     After the plan has been copied over, please verify if all the elements and actions are correctly copied over. The details of elements and actions are listed out in the Technical Design document for reference. For example, verify that actions for assigning a value to the Sample Disposition Code, Quantity, Inspection Result are present. Verify that the Action on Inspection Result for Accept and Reject are correct etc. Please verify the element settings such as Mandatory-flag, read-only flag etc are as per the Technical Design document .
    8.     Also, navigate to Quality à Setup à Collection Elements form and verify the Sample Disposition Code seeded element is correctly seeded – Refer to Technical Design document for reference.
    9.     In Oracle Quality, the profile option QA: PO Inspection set to “Oracle Quality” instead of “Oracle Purchasing”.
    10.     In Purchasing Receiving Options, set Receipt Routing to ‘INSPECTION REQUIRED’
    User Implementation Guide consideration for Receiving Inspection.
    1. It is recommended that the total receipt line quantity be recorded as either the amount of material accepted or rejected based on the final sample group disposition, since partial quantities typically do not apply to Process items.
    i.e If the Inspection result is “Accept” then Accepted Quantity must be equal to Quantity and Rejected Quantity must be zero. If the Inspection result is “Reject” then Rejected Quality must be equal to Quantity and Accepted Quantity must be zero.
    2. With reference to the ‘Reject the Input’ action with an error message to prevent recording inspection when sample disp is Pending or Cancel etc., there is one point to note, viz. - When you have a ‘Reject the Input’ action, there is a corresponding error message this column is not a Translated column.. Hence the Quality Manager who manages collection plans setup, can alter this message content to suit their needs as appropriate during implementation.
    3. It was also clarified that in Oracle Quality, user can enter more than one row of result in the collection plan. In the OPM scenario, most of the times, user will enter only one row of result and this is the recommendation.
    4. To ensure that the tie-up between the quality records and the sample inspection in the OPM data model for future usage is operative, then please make sure that Oracle Alerts sub-system in functioning.
    Debgging information
    1. If get error
    APP-QA-16135: Quality Results cannot be entered because no Collection Plans apply" in the Receiving Transaction form.
    a,. Add a transaction named "Inspection Transaction" to this plan
    b, . Don't setup a spec for this collection plan in Oracle Quality - so under the Specification pushbutton, the 'No specifications used' radio button will be selected
    2. Is the receiving option receipt routing set to ‘Inspection required”
    3.The design does not allow for accept or reject of partial quantities – is the ct using partial quantities ?
    4.This is a one shot deal on the collection plan entering of quality results. Is the ct trying to re-enter results in the collection plan again?
    5. Receiving inspection requires the sample group to be at a final disposition. Is the customer using single sample, sample groups or multi-sample sample groups when this occurs? Is the automatic single sample disposition workflow set to auto or manual?
    Because neither the quantity or sample result is being picked up, maybe the sample group for the sample(s) is not at a final disposition. This may explain why this is being regarded as intermittent.
    6. Note bug 5300577
    Once a sample or sample group has been assigned a final disposition of Accept, Accept with Variance, Reject, or Cancel, it should not be updateable to another disposition. Please check what is the customer's scenario that allows them to change from the Reject disposition to Accept with Variance. Are they entering a second sample against the same receipt and sample group as the first sample? Or perhaps the second sample belongs to a different sample group than the first sample?
    7. To clarify . When you open the screen to enter results in Oracle Quality, it will reflect whatever is the current sample group disposition that corresponds to the item/receipt. I believe collection plans in Oracle Quality only allow data to be entered and saved once. After this point, the user cannot go back to this screen from Oracle Purchasing. If the user does not save any data, then s/he can re-enter the form multiple times and see the up-to-date sample group disposition automatically populated.
    8. In Oracle Quality, user can enter more than one row of result in the collection plan. In an OPM scenario, most of the times, user will enter only one row of result.

  • Error while cloning database using RMAN

    hi there,
    Here is our setup:
    OS: Solaris 5.9
    Database:9.2.0.3
    While cloning test database from our production database using RMAN, we happen to get the following error..
    RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
    RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
    RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
    RMAN-03002: failure of Duplicate Db command at 12/11/2007 15:28:59
    RMAN-03015: error occurred in stored script Memory Script
    RMAN-06026: some targets not found - aborting restore
    RMAN-06100: no channel to restore a backup or copy of datafile 450
    RMAN-06100: no channel to restore a backup or copy of datafile 449
    give us a solution to rectify this problem.
    Thanks,
    Balu.

    Can you please post the RMAN restore script ?
    where are the backups located

  • Error generating the Test Frame

    Hello all,
    I have created few Function Modules (SE37) which are working fine on the dev system. After I moved them to the Quality system, when I tried to run them, all of them are giving this error before even going to the test screen:
    "Error generating the test frame"
    When I check the details of the error, by clicking on the "?" on the error window, it says there is a missing structure, that I have used in my FM. But the structure is not missing. It does exist in the system (I checked from SE11)
    Can someone tell me how I can resolve this problem?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Reena

    Hi,
    Just go to ST22 and see the dump created. It will tell you the table or structure name ( Standard ) that is missing/inconsistent in the quality system.  You can consult with your basis team to rectify this. Some tables may be partially active or with run time inconsistencies.
    Regards,
    S. Chandra Mouli.
    Message was edited by:
            Chandramouli Subburathinam

  • Smartform-Error generating the test frame

    i am passing a internal table to a smartform and defined the associated type for that internal table under TYPES tab of the Global Definition.
    While testing  the smartform it gives a runtime error i.e. Error generating the test frame.
    kindly advice where i am going wrong
    Thanks
    Ravi

    Hi Ravindra ,
    Test such smartforms with a program and not through SE37 .  Not supported see error message -
    <b>The test framework for /1BCDWB/SF00000031 has been regenerated but errors have occurred
    Message no. FL821
    Diagnosis
    One reason can be the complex typing of the function module parameters.
    In certain circumstances you cannot access the test cases in the test data directory.
    Procedure
    The test environment of the function builder cannot map (or map correctly) complex types, so that you cannot read or write this data to the test database.</b>
    Cheers

  • Search works for a while then goes on error

    Hi. I am using CFSearch and loving it.
    But, after a few hours of working fine it goes on error with
    the following message:
    There was a problem executing the CFSearch tag with the
    following collections. Collection (status code): [MyCollection]
    (-1706)
    Has anyone else experienced this?
    Matt

    Someone else in the forums experienced a similar problem.
    Their solution was to bounce the service. Not a perfect solution,
    but one that works.
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?forumid=1&catid=3&threadid=12 79952&enterthread=y

  • PHP setup - Testing server errors

    Hi all,
    I am into my first play with Dynamic web pages. I am trying
    to get a database and dreamweaver to connect together. I have tried
    a variety of settings to get it to work but everytime I seem to
    come across a problem with the folder where the database are
    located and trying to map to the URL prefix mapping.
    My databse is located in C:/phpdev5/mysql/data/artist
    I cannot fathom where to point the URL prefix too. (For
    further info the local root folder is elsewhere and the remote
    folder is my live website- I did try to get it to connect to that
    but gave up and tried doing it locally for the moment).
    Can anyone stop me from tearing my hair out.
    Mark

    > My databse is located in C:/phpdev5/mysql/data/artist
    a MySQL database isn't in one place, it's a collection of
    information stored
    in the MySQL application. You interact with it using a
    database_name/username/password.
    The url prefix for the testing server is what's needed to
    view the site
    using the local server. Such as:
    http://localhost/thissite/
    Alan
    Adobe Community Expert, dreamweaver
    http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/

  • Creating a planned order with error "Material requires configuration"

    Dear All,
    I am facing a problem for creation of a planned order with error "Material requires configuration".
    To follow the note 180317, I change Account Assignment Category to "U" (Unknown).
    However, the system still does display the same error.
    Could you please help provide possible solution for this?
    Regards,
    Phong

    See also the following blog post:
    Configurable planned order for material variants: Exception "53: No BOM explosion due to missing configuration"
    BR
    Caetano

  • AppContainers_test fails with error during pre-test configuration checks

    Hello,
    AppContainers_test fails with error during pre-test configuration checks:
    "[FAIL] The machine is not properly configured for testing: the test directory "C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\" is not ACL'd to allow execute permission for "APPLICATION PACKAGE AUTHORITY\ALL APPLICATION PACKAGES"
    But that kind of permission for APPLICATION PACKAGE AUTHORITY\ALL APPLICATION PACKAGES was allowed, also i tried to allow full access, but error was the same.
    In the test WindowsFilteringPlatform_Tests, the same requirement "REQ - Wfp-based products must not block App Container apps operating within their declared network intentions by default" was checked successfully.
    How can i pass successfully AppContainers_test? 
    I installed lastest versions of QFE and filters on my server, but it didn't help.

    Hi M'Alerter,
    I have the same issue, have you found a solution to your problem ? 
    Cheers,
    Ghalem

  • Collective Planned orders Scheduling for lower level orders with reference to the Superior order

    Hi All,
    Collective planned order scheduling.
    I have been trying to reschedule the superior planned order and i was expecting the lower level planned orders to reschedule based on the superior planned order.
    My problem is
    when i try to reschedule the superior planned order the system is not rescheduling the lower level planned orders.
    For example if i change the basic finish date of superior planned order as 30/09/2014 and reschedule the planned order it is only scheduling the header planned order and the lower level planned order is not scheduling.
    Could some one tell me why this is not happenning at planned order level.
    As the rescheduling of collective order will work at production order level but for some reason it is not happening at planned order level(as there is no option available to do so).
    Please give your thoughts on this asap.
    Mahee.

    Hello Mahee
    Please observe that your system is working as designed. Planned orders are scheduled independently, even when they are part of a network/collective order. Note 152319 explains the planned order scheduling in detail and it provides the following information:
    * No scheduling of overall networks is executed although a directly manufactured component is assigned.
    Note that no scheduling of the overall network is executed for planned orders. For the components requirements dates are determined. In order to cover them, planned orders are created in the next MRP run. Since the requirements are not managed using the exact time, the results of the planned order scheduling and of a scheduling of the overall network of the converted collective order can differ.
    BR
    Caetano

Maybe you are looking for