Collective confirmation for operation
Hi expert
my requirement is below.
suppose in my maintenance order I have three operation
operation 1 with 8hrs 4 person with 2 hr each
operation 2 with 6 hrs 3 person with 2hr each
operation 3 with 4 hr 1person with 4hr
Ii go in IW48 collective confirmation there i do confirmation for only operation 1. save it
next time again I go in iw48 I expect remaining two operation should come in list as for first operation is finally complete.
but it not happens . it is display in list and shows worning meassage for operation 1 while doing again confirmation .
worning meassage is fine but I want even that operation should not come in list . only those operation who are not confirm that should only dispaly in list
how to do this ??
Regards,
prasad
Hi Narasimhan
Thanks
but I tried that also .
this status is system status for order right ?
what happens ......my orderr is having three operation outof this 1 is finaly completed and two are partially . So my order status remains PCNF . so now if I put PCNF status in said field then also all three operation get displayed in next screen
where I want only two operation for which confirmation is not done that should display
one more thing .. ....................when I put selection criteria in IW48 ,in next screen I can able to see all confirmation no and order no matching the criteria .then I select confirmation no and click on ALL ACTUAL DATA button. this showns me conifrmation details and shows error for those finaly completed
Is this right way to make collective confirmation ??
regards,
Prasad
Similar Messages
-
Inspection point qty confirmation for operation - INprocess Inspection
Hi Experts,
After doing partial confirmation in the Result recording, the partial confirmed qty moves down to the next operation and is confirmed. But using QM result recording when I try to post the next partial qty, the system cancels the previous confirmation although the next operation has been confirmed for the partial qty. And I am able to confirm the full qty for the operation
How to avoid this situation ?
Regds
JomyDear Jomy,
Please use 150 as the inspection point in your routing header.
But please make sure that in configuration you have this maintained.
SPRO>QM> Quality planning > inspection planning > general > define identifier for inspection point> select the inspection point you are using >double click> function module> maintain in Automatic creation of insp. Points > maintain this function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE > tick the use function module
Test with a new order and lot. Each time you go for RR it will go for new partial lots. So confirmation will get added up as in co11n process.
Hope this helps
Regards
gajesh -
Print confirmation for operation
Hi
In Control key customization, Print confirm is checked
How i can take a Confirmation slip Print out ? In Which Tcode ?
ThanksDear Kumar,
Please try the following and revert.
. use tcode COOIS
- give the production order number in the selection at header level.
- in the next screen selection the production order number and display.
- click functions and click print.
This will immediately print the required documents.
Regards
Kannan -
Production confirmations for Production order
Hi all
I am using ECC 6.0 and Production orders. When I do a final confirmation to the order the order is in a 'CNF' status. Now after it is in a CNF status if I try to perform another confirmation using a CO15 then it allows me to do a confirmation with a 'warning'. If I am using a CO11 or CO11N then its a hard error. Is there a way I can get a warning message on a already Final confirmed order in tcode CO11 or CO11N?
thanksHi John,
You want the system to allow to confirm operation wise even though you have already confirmed with respect to order
I dont think its possible,because if you see logically -once we do the confirmation for the order system will complete the confirmation for operations too ie it will book the time,cost to the respective cost center
So logically it will not be possible to confirm the operations which are already confirmed when doing the order confirmation
If you want to do order wise confirmation then you have to cancel the order confirmation & then you will be able to do operation wise confirmation
Hope the above explantion is understandable
Revert back if you have further query
Reward points if useful
Regards,
SVP -
Report for operation confirmations
Hi
Product A . production order qty is 100.
It has 4 operations.10,20,30,40.
for operation 10 confirmed qty 100
operation 20 confirmed qty 80
operation 30 confirmed qty 85
40 100
I want a report in which i want pull all the orders with this kind of confirmations so that it is easy for me to correct it.
In coois report we can see all the orders and it is very difficult to check each and every order weather it is confirmed properly or not.Please help.Dear,
Go to COOIS,
List :- Opertion
Select Order Type :- PP01
Plant = 1000
Syst. Status REL and CNF Exclude Tick
And execute the report go inside and change lay out Here add two filed Operation quantity and Yield and save the lay out now you will have all required details that you want just try and come back.
Edited by: R Brahmankar on Jan 28, 2011 12:22 PM -
Auto execution of CO11N using scanner for operation level Prod. confirm
Hi PP champs
I am looking for a potential development for my current project and i am sure somebody can help me in this.
- Automatic operation confirmation for Production Order using the scanner. Client's requirement is that they want to do the operation wise confirmation .If my Prodcution Order print is Barcoded , will it be possible for me to go for Auto execution of CO11N , In which system should follwn the operation sequence also.
I am having a doubt for the possibility to record the actual time also during a specific operation
Pl share your valuable inputs for the same..
Thanks in advance
BR
Sumit SharmaHI Sumit,
if I understand you correctly you want to use an external system with scanner to request the confirmation.
You can use BAPI or IDOC for this I think.
See transaction BAPI to get a list of all possible BAPIS for confirmation.
Regards,
Sabine -
DB-Table PO for time to confirm for each actvity type (operation)
Hello All,
I search the DB-Table for the time to confirm for each activity type (operation/production order).
(CO03>operation details>qty/activities-->to confirm).
I have found the following tables - but without success:
AFRU
AFVC
AFVV
PLPO
I search not the standard vals (AFVV). Who can help me?
Thanks & regards
SaschaSascha,
Table AFVV has the details:
Standard Values:
VGE01 VGWRTEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the standard value
VGW01 VGWRT QUAN 9 3 Standard value
VGE02 VGWRTEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the standard value
VGW02 VGWRT QUAN 9 3 Standard value
VGE03 VGWRTEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the standard value
VGW03 VGWRT QUAN 9 3 Standard value
VGE04 VGWRTEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the standard value
VGW04 VGWRT QUAN 9 3 Standard value
VGE05 VGWRTEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the standard value
VGW05 VGWRT QUAN 9 3 Standard value
VGE06 VGWRTEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the standard value
VGW06 VGWRT QUAN 9 3 Standard value
For actual values confirmed:
ILE01 CO_ISMNGEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the activity to be confirmed
ILE02 CO_ISMNGEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the activity to be confirmed
ILE03 CO_ISMNGEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the activity to be confirmed
ILE04 CO_ISMNGEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the activity to be confirmed
ILE05 CO_ISMNGEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the activity to be confirmed
ILE06 CO_ISMNGEH UNIT 3 0 Unit of measure for the activity to be confirmed
Hope this is useful.
Regards
Ram -
Confirmation for sub-operation
Hi Expert,
As we know that confirmation has to be maintaned for each work order confirmation.
Current condition, we also have to maintained confirmation for each work order sub-operation.
Is there any possibility that only operation level of work order that need to be confirmed? instead of sub-operation level? in assumption that work order created with both operation and sub-operation
illiustration:
Operation 0010 Greasing
Sub operation 0010/0011 cleanning
Sub operation 0010/0012 inspection
Confirmation conducted for operation 0010 Greasing only, instead of all operation and sub operations
Thanks
Pls Help
RgdsLeni,
There is nothing in the standard system that would force you to create confirmations at either operation or sub-operation level (unless you have done something in your system)
PeteA -
Confirmation for Split operation in Production order
Hi Experts,
I have one production order say order no. is "100000000000" and its order qty is 100pcs and in operation no. "20", i have splitted the operation into two individual capacities and allocated 50pcs to each individual capacity. Now can any one explain me or tell me the steps required for confirming the operation quantity by individual capcity.
Regards,
Satya.Hi,
Thanks for your response on my post.
As you mentioned I am using T-code CO11N for Production confirmation, but in this screen if I select operation no. 20, by default, system is read work center from production order "operation overview" screen. Now I want to capture the confirmation quantity against "induvidual capacity" and want to see some reports based on "induvidual capacity" level of the same work center.
Could you pl. advise on this.
Regards,
Satya. -
Barcode for operation confirmation
My client is using barcode for operation confirmation. Please advise How to configure this in PP Discrete orders? Pls mentin the possible steps to implement this?
Hi,
In routing, the control key should have the Tick of print. Then the printer should be configured to print the operation details. After releasing the production order, the BARcode will be printed, then the same bar code can be scanned for the confirmation. The BARcode scanner should read the BARcode details and it has to update in CO11N transaction.
Better you can discuss with your ABAP consultant. He can guide you more clearly.
Regards,
V. Suresh -
Back flushing for collective confirmation
hi friends
While confirmation of production order in CO11N system is not allowing to do confirmation if any deficit of BOM components. All materials are set as backflushed.
Where as while confirming in collective in t.code: CO12 , system is allowing to do confirmation even if stock not availble in particular storage location. I want to terminate the transaction if stock not availble. How to configure this for collective confirmation. pl suggest me.
regards
sspHi,
This feature is not available for CO12.
===================
We define the Error Handling ( Termination) etc. in the Transaction OPK4, Tab page" General Individual Entry".
The Confirmation Parameters for this tab page are only available for the Transactions:CO11, CO11N, CO19, CO1F & CO15.
So, you can not use this feature for CO12. For above said Transactions only you can restrict the Goods Movement Errors.
=====================
Hope this clarifies..
Regards,
Siva -
Web Service execution failed for operation: ReadLogFile
Hello,
im getting the following error message in almost all of my Diagnostic Agent log files:
[MAIJobObserver] ERROR occurred for metric collection
00000000000000000019[com.sap.smd.mai.model.collector.SAPControlWSCollector].
[EXCEPTION]
com.sap.smd.mai.model.collector.CollectorException:
[SAPControlWSCollector.collect] Web Service execution failed for operation:
ReadLogFile. Collector : [SAPControlWSCollector]
Id: 00000000000000000019,
SID: EPX, instance number:00
at
com.sap.smd.mai.model.collector.SAPControlWSCollector.collect(SAPControlWSCollector.java:200)
at
com.sap.smd.mai.job.MetricJobRunner.run(MetricJobRunner.java:25)
at
com.sap.smd.server.exec.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:46)
at
com.sap.smd.server.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:785)
at
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
Caused by: java.rmi.RemoteException:
Service call exception; nested exception is:
com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.exceptions.InvalidResponseCodeException:
Invalid Response Code: (401) Unauthorized. The requested URL
was:http://<hostname>:50013/SAPControl.cgi
I checked on SAP note 1563660 - sapcontrol, <sid>adm authorization issues (SUM) and confirmed, that ALL installations of the "sapuxuserchk" program are set with "chown root.sapsys" and "chmod u+s,o-rwx". I restarted the diagnostic Agent aftwards.
I also checked on host_profile an made sure, that the parameter "service/admin_users = daaadm" is set.
Still I get the above error messages, so I am at a loss what else to do...
A lot of thanks for your Support !
Best regards,
ThorstenHi Thorsten,
Please check the user used for registration of Diagnostic agent to Solution Manager has appropriate roles assigned (e.g. user SMD_ADMIN)
Also please update to latest patch of SAP Host agent and then try again.
Hope this helps
Thanks & Regards,
Nisha -
Help,why brconnect do not collect statistics for mseg table?
I found "MSEG" table`s statistics is too old.
so i check logs in db13,and the schedule job do not collect statistics for "MSEG".
Then i execute manually: brconnect -c -u system/system -f stats -t mseg -p 4
this command still do not collect for mseg.
KS1DSDB1:oraprd 2> brconnect -c -u system/system -f stats -t mseg u2013f collect -p 4
BR0801I BRCONNECT 7.00 (46)
BR0154E Unexpected option value 'u2013f' found at position 8
BR0154E Unexpected option value 'collect' found at position 9
BR0806I End of BRCONNECT processing: ceenwjre.log 2010-11-12 08.41.38
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-11-12 08.41.38
BR0804I BRCONNECT terminated with errors
KS1DSDB1:oraprd 3> brconnect -c -u system/system -f stats -t mseg -p 4
BR0801I BRCONNECT 7.00 (46)
BR0805I Start of BRCONNECT processing: ceenwjse.sta 2010-11-12 08.42.04
BR0484I BRCONNECT log file: /oracle/PRD/sapcheck/ceenwjse.sta
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-11-12 08.42.11
BR0813I Schema owners found in database PRD: SAPPRD*, SAPPRDSHD+
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-11-12 08.42.12
BR0807I Name of database instance: PRD
BR0808I BRCONNECT action ID: ceenwjse
BR0809I BRCONNECT function ID: sta
BR0810I BRCONNECT function: stats
BR0812I Database objects for processing: MSEG
BR0851I Number of tables with missing statistics: 0
BR0852I Number of tables to delete statistics: 0
BR0854I Number of tables to collect statistics without checking: 0
BR0855I Number of indexes with missing statistics: 0
BR0856I Number of indexes to delete statistics: 0
BR0857I Number of indexes to collect statistics: 0
BR0853I Number of tables to check (and collect if needed) statistics: 1
Owner SAPPRD: 1
MSEG
BR0846I Number of threads that will be started in parallel to the main thread: 4
BR0126I Unattended mode active - no operator confirmation required
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-11-12 08.42.16
BR0817I Number of monitored/modified tables in schema of owner SAPPRD: 1/1
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-11-12 08.42.16
BR0877I Checking and collecting table and index statistics...
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-11-12 08.42.16
BR0879I Statistics checked for 1 table
BR0878I Number of tables selected to collect statistics after check: 0
BR0880I Statistics collected for 0/0 tables/indexes
BR0806I End of BRCONNECT processing: ceenwjse.sta 2010-11-12 08.42.16
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2010-11-12 08.42.17
BR0802I BRCONNECT completed successfully
the log says:
Number of tables selected to collect statistics after check: 0
Could you give some advices? thanks a lot.Hello,
If you would like to force the creation of that stats for table MSEG you need to use the -f (force) switch.
If you leave out the -f switch the parameter from stats_change_threshold is taken like you said correctly:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/02/0ae0c6395911d5992200508b6b8b11/content.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/02/0ae0c6395911d5992200508b6b8b11/content.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/cb/f1e33a5bd8e934e10000000a114084/content.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/cb/f1e33a5bd8e934e10000000a114084/content.htm]
You have tried to do this in your second example :
==> brconnect -c -u system/system -f stats -t mseg u2013f collect -p 4
Therefore you received:
BR0154E Unexpected option value 'u2013f' found at position 8
BR0154E Unexpected option value 'collect' found at position 9
This is the correct statement, however the hyphen in front of the f switch is not correct.
Try again with the following statement (-f in stead of u2013f) you will see that it will work:
==> brconnect -c -u system/system -f stats -t mseg -f collect -p 4
I hope this can help you.
Regards.
Wim -
Collective confirmation through COGI-reg
Hi
When I do collective confirmation through COHV for production orders, Final issue indicator is set automatically and system does not allow any good issue posting for that orders. can you tell me whether any setting to be done in customising.
Regards
KarthikeyanCheck in OPK1 and OPK0 in the defaults is there a check box ticked for - clear oper reservations?
If so then the reservation against the ordfer wikll be closed as it will be defaulted during confirmation -
Milestone Confirmation for Process Orders
Hi,
We are using PPPI and I am trying to perform a milestone confirmation for phase (COR6). Although it is working without errors, it prompts you for which phase to confirm.
In discrete PP, you set up milestones, and when you go to CO11 - confirm operation, the system automatically goes to the details for the first milestone operation.
Is there any way you can do this with proces orders for COR6, ie automatically go to the detail screen for the milstone phase?
Regards,
Fotini DelgadoHi
u can use t; code COR6 : confirmation of process order
we can enter operation number (same as final one )
so we can directly confirm last Phase
or
We can use
CORR : for collective confirmation of process order
or
CORZ : confirmation : for time event
please tell me if u have any more question
Thanks
Sunil Singh
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to fix sound distortion on an iPod?
I have a 4th generation iPod shuffle. When i use ear buds with it, the sound will be fine at first, but after a few days the sound will start to get distorted. If I mess with the ear buds for a little I can fix the sound for a few seconds. After a wh
-
Patch Problem... patch no 6930112....
Hi, Has anyone tried to apply patch 6930112, "APPS ADAPTER NOT WORKING WITH USER OTHERTHAN THE "APPS"", on Linux (E-Business Suite 11.5.10). When I try to apply, it fails at the point.... please refer to the logs below.... Creating FND_INSTALL_PROCES
-
Report by order reason in customer returns
Hi gurus, I need a report or list transaction that it shows "customer returns" by "filter order reason". In standar report of SIV I don't see option to filter sales order by "order reason" Any idea? Thank you!! I will reward points all answers!!!
-
Hi, can i upgrade or use dual gpu-s in my elitebook 2570p ?
I was wondering if i could use two gpu-s in my laptop 2570p elitebook ?
-
Where does the iDVD templates folder reside?
And is it accesible. I am I guess bored for lack of a better term with DVDSP apple provided templates and always liked a number of the iDVD ones that I would love to be able to import to DVDSP, However I know where and how to access DVDSP's templates