Collective Order Actual Activity Pricing

Hi Gurus
We are using collective orders for production orders. As you know collective processes are used for costing shared processes.
Let me explain the problem with an example: Say, we have product A and B to be produced. These two have shared operations and costs will be collected via collective orders by Tcode mill_oc.
The process is as below:
Production order 1 for product A. - Normal production order - CO01
Production order 2 for product B. - Normal production order - CO01
Production order 3 for product A - Collective production order - mill_oc
Confirmations are done for Order 3 during period. At the end of the period Order 3 is settled to Order 1 and Order 2 with certain proportions.
Actual activity price is calculated via Tcode:KSII. During CKMLCP the system valuates activities (posting price differences) for Order 3 product, Product A only. It must be the case that Product A and Product B have to be revaluated.
NOTE: Actual activity price is valuated in material ledger, rather in orders (not with CON2)
Is there any OSS notes or solution for this problem? If there is huge activity price differences, all the value is posted to just one product, which is collective orders product, rather than both lower level orders' products.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Ahmet

Hi Ahmet,
This is rather a problem of material ledger multi-level settlement than of activity pricing. Material ledger will pick up the actual activity price correctly and will use the difference against the former activvity price as multi-level price difference on the production process. The problem is, if there are multiple outputs coming out of the process, as is resulting of the order combination process, material ledger will by default search for a apportionment structure (for joint production) in the material master of the main (or original) output material. As nothing will be maintained there, all the differences will go to this material.
You can overcome the situation by a BADI implementation of BADI cost_split. There should be an example implementation in your system (if you have the Mill Products add-on active, as is indicated because you use Mill_oc) that enables to distribute the price differences by quantity of the outputs of a process. If you don't find the example implementation I could provide it to you.
best regards,
           Udo

Similar Messages

  • Actual activity pricing - KSII

    why do the actual activity pricing is required using Tcode KSII ?

    it totally depends on business requirement,
    Normally you valuate/absorb overhead on product with plan activity rate and using same rate inventory is valuated.Though for same activity may incurr more actual cost which is not getting reflected in planned rate.
    This kind of requirements are handled through actual pricing.In this case using SAP splitting calculate actual rate and revaluate inventories.This will adjust you p/l with this amount.
    regards,
    ashok

  • Customer order actual activity report

    Dear experts,
    I am using make to order strategy and I have a multilevel BOM structure. I am following some semi-finished products individually for customer order and some for make to stock. I need a report to see the actual activity confirmations for a single customer order including all the activities of semi-finished products in BOM. For your help please.

    Hi Ahmet,
    This is rather a problem of material ledger multi-level settlement than of activity pricing. Material ledger will pick up the actual activity price correctly and will use the difference against the former activvity price as multi-level price difference on the production process. The problem is, if there are multiple outputs coming out of the process, as is resulting of the order combination process, material ledger will by default search for a apportionment structure (for joint production) in the material master of the main (or original) output material. As nothing will be maintained there, all the differences will go to this material.
    You can overcome the situation by a BADI implementation of BADI cost_split. There should be an example implementation in your system (if you have the Mill Products add-on active, as is indicated because you use Mill_oc) that enables to distribute the price differences by quantity of the outputs of a process. If you don't find the example implementation I could provide it to you.
    best regards,
               Udo

  • Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

    hi ,
    During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e  "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
    Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
    pls help me to solve this problem.
    AMOL WAGH
    Edited by: amol  wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
    Edited by: amol  wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

    Dear,
    For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
    After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
    Please give the feed back.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

    hi ,
    During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
    Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
    pls help me to solve this problem.
    AMOL WAGH

    Dear,
    What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
    For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like  machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
    After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
    When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
    Please check the above in the system
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Transacciu00F3n MFN1 - Error KA465: Production order with an actual activity up

    Hi Exerts,
    I am executing transaction MFN1 with "Update of Activity Consumption in the Quantity Structure" = 2 and the following error ocurrs: "KA465 Production order with an actual activity update.".
    I changed the customizing "Update of Activity Consumption in the Quantity Structure" to "Activity update not relevant to price determination", after this I exectuted transaction MFN1 again and the error didn't occur.
    I need to understand what is the impact of changing this customizing, and if I set the "Update of Activity Consumption..." equal 2, the activity actual values are revaluated in the CKM3N? If the answer is yes, in what point of the CKMLCP this value is revaluated?.
    Regards

    Hi,
    please check CKM9 for the relevant plant how you define the Activity update. Please note KA465 is justified to avoid posting the credits and debits twice if the indicator is '2'.
    If you are using activity update '2', the differences between planned and actual activity prices are not distributed to the orders but via multilevel price determination directly to the materials.
    The system determines the actual prices by means of the multi-level price determination in the actual calculation.
    In the actual calculation, the system also already debits the materials and credits the cost centers or vice versa.
    In this case, the revaluation must not be executed because otherwise the system posts the debits and credits twice. In this case, the system ought to display error message KA465.
    Note 686588 explains under what circumstances error KA465 may be raised, that is, if you have activated Material Ledger/Actual Costing with Activity Consumption '2'. Please check your Material Ledger settings in relation to note 686588.
    If you use activity update '1' then revaluation is done via the orders and no longer via Material Ledger.
    regards
    Waman

  • Pricing conditions for the articles are getting triggered one day before the actual activation date to 3rd party systems through job WPMU.

    Hi SAP Guru´s,
    Currently we are sending the pricing, promotions & article master data delta load to 3rd party system from SAP ECC via SAP XI through IDOCS using daily scheduled batch jobs WPMU. IDOC segment - WP_PLU.
    Here the issue is the promotion & pricing data are sent to 3rd party system one day before the actual start date.
    Eg: Promotion 123456 which has start date as 15/05/2014 & ending on 30/05/2014 & was created & activated on 13/05/2014.
    This promotion 123456 is getting triggered from SAP ECC through batch job on 14/05/2014 morning & 3rd party system receives the data on 14/05/2014 & the promotion are getting activated at 3rd party system end on 14/05/2014 itself which actually gets active from 15/05/2014.
    Same in the case for Standard Pricing data which needs to be active from 31/05/2014 once the promotion 123456 ends on 30/05/2014.
    The standard pricing data gets triggered from SAP ECC on 30/05/2014 through batch job & reaching 3rd party system on 30/05/2014 & getting activate on 30/05/2014 itself.
    This creates more issues at the store end as well as affecting business.
    We checked at 3rd party system end & they replied that their system considers the updated time stamp & date to activate the prices & it does not considers the actual active from & active to date. They need the data to be sent from SAP ECC on the effective date of the pricing & promotions.
    Can any one help me how to change the pricing conditions beign triggered through batch job in SAP ECC based on the actual promotion & pricing conditons start date or is there any other process to trigger the data through the batch job on the actual promotion & pricing data activation date.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Thanks & Regards,
    P.P.Shankar

    Hello Shankar,
    Change the lead time in the POS Outbound Profile. You can't put less than 2 days there so data for today and tomorrow will be transferred which also means you need to adjust your batch timing accordingly.
    Sales and Distribution -> POS Interface -> Outbound -> Maintain Profile for POS Outbound.
    See if it helps. The best option would still be that the 3rd part system considers the activtion date.
    Kind Regards
    Kaizad

  • Actual activity price calculation for production order

    Hi
    Can any one guide me in how many ways we can assign actual activity price calculation for production order?
    I knew only one way by assigning PPP2 costing variant?
    I have another doubt is: if we don't mention any material valuation indicator (moving average, standard) in valuation variant, how system will calculate material prices? is there any other way, to recognize the prices by system?
    regards,
    Ramesh B

    Dear,
    Costing variant PPP2 is linked to some valuation variant inn OPL1
    System will check the valuation of material and activity according to this valuation variant
    For material valuation there are many stg acceding to which system will take the price the raw material,
    Valuation strategy for material component
    Strategy sequence that determines the valuation of the materials used in the cost estimate.
    Use
    The materials are valuated using the price in the material master record or the values calculated in a material cost estimate.
    Procedure
    You can enter a single strategy, or you can enter multiple strategies in the form of a strategy sequence. If you enter multiple strategies, the priority of the strategy determines what price or what values are selected.
    Examples
    Assume that the following strategy sequence is entered for material valuation:
    1. Planned price 1
    2. Standard price
    3. Moving average price
    If the system finds a value in the Planned price 1 field (costing view), this value is taken as the value for valuating the material.
    If the system does not find a value, the value in the Standard price field (accounting view) is used.
    If the material does not have a standard price, the system uses the value from the Moving average price field.
    if you have not mentioned, then system will give error that "valuation stg not found"
    Valuation strategy for internal activities and processes-
    Strategy sequence that determines how internal activities and processes are valuated in costing.
    Use
    The activities and business processes used are valuated with the prices from Cost Center Accounting or Activity-Based Costing to determine the production costs or process costs. The prices can either be calculated iteratively through price calculation, or entered manually by the user.
    Procedure
    You can enter either a single strategy or more than one strategy in the form of a strategy sequence. If you enter more than one strategy, the priority of the strategy determines which price is selected.
    Examples
    The following strategy sequence is entered:
    1. Actual price of the previous period
    2. Plan price of the previous period
    3. The most current plan price
    If the system finds a price for the activity type, this price is used for valuating the internal activities. If no price was calculated for the previous period, the plan price from the previous period is used to valuate the activity type.
    If the system cannot find a plan price for the previous period, it looks for a future plan price, using the next price in the posting period to valuate the internal activities. For example, if plan prices have been entered for periods 2 and 3, and a plan price is calculated in period 1 for period 4, the system uses the price from period 3 in accordance with the valuation strategy Most up-to-date plan price.
    Again if you have not mentioned, then system will give error that "valuation stg not found".
    You can use any costing variant for actual (PPP2)and planned(PPP1) according to your requirement.. check in OPL1

  • Activating Pricing for Sales Order in Retail

    Hi All/Vijay/KK,
    Please tell me how activate the pricing for sales order, actually in SD we do Pricing Determination, what has to be done for Retail pricing

    Hi,
    To do sales order pricing
    Goto IMG>Sales & Distribution>Basic Functions>Pricing>Pricing Control
    Either Follow Standard, condition type PR00
    or in case of Custom
    1. Use condition table 406 Site/article
    2. Define Access Sequences ZPR0
    Enter accesses:10 406 Site/article Exclusive x
    3. Define Condition Types (ZPR0 assign newly defined access sequence)
    4. Define And Assign Pricing Procedures (assign condition types ZPR0..etc. to it)
    Then maintain condition record , go to VK11 --> Enter your Z condition type (eg. ZPR0)., enter the amounts.
    Add the pricing procedure , to sales document type.
    For Retail Sales Pricing
    For Retail Sales Pricing based on Purchase pricing you can follow the following method:
    The retail price is always based on the purchase net/net price. This purchase net price is built up from the purchasing pricing elements or condition types defined to be included in the purchase net price. A planned mark-up is applied to the purchase net/net to calculate the proposed retail price. The planned mark-up can be set by merchandise category and for exceptions, more specifically by article.
    You can perform Two-step calculation for retail pricing, for example, for stores that are supplied by a distribution center (internal vendor). Calculating sales prices for the stores is based on the transfer price for distribution centers (preceding organizational unit).
    1. Set up Master Data (WB02) - Relevant Fields should be maintained
    2. Set up Article Master Data - Logistics DC and Store View (MM42)
    Relevant Fields should be maintained
    3. Maintain Mark up for DC(VK11) -Markup % at Distribution channel distribution chain level
    Mark ups maintained at two levels:
    For DC: At distribution chain level
    Condition type used: AUFS
    For Stores: At article level
    New condition type ZUFS created.
    4. Maintain Mark up for Stores (VK11) Markup % at Store distribution chain level
    5 Create Pricing Procedures (IMG) -Pricing Procedures created
    6. Carry out Price calculation for DC(VKP5) - Pricing Document created - DC Transfer price calculated
    7. Carry out Price calculation for Stores (VKP5) - Pricing Document created - Final Retail Price Calculated
    The final retail price that is calculated is stored in the condition type VKP0.
    Hope it helps,
    Regards,
    Anirban Roy

  • Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

    Friends,
    I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
    1.Cost Component Structure
    10 – Material
    20 – Labour
    30 – Diesel
    40 – Electricity
    2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
    Labour – 2.0 HR
    Diesel – 1.0 HR
    Electricity – 5.0 HR
    3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
    Like;
    1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
    2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
    3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
    4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
    6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                              13.00                    AED       
    4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
    BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
    Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                              2.67- AED
    Note :- As per my understanding it should be
        Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                    Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                    Electricity Cost                                                1.00
    5.Now after Process Order confirmation
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                              16.00
    6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
    I have configured the system in below manner
    1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
    Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
    For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
          Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
    One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
          Product/Order
    7.Assessment Cycle Details
    Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
    Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
    Start Date 01.01.2014  To  31.10.2014
    Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
    IND- Interactive
    Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
    Sender
    Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
    Cost Element 40204
    Receiver
    Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
    Tracing Factor
    Var.portion type – Actual Activity
    Selaction Criteria
    Activity Type - ELE30
    Receivers Tracing Factor
    Cost Ctr Factor per        100
    CBAKYPDDXB 100
    8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
    After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                    1100.00
    Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
    But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
    When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
    OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                          2200.06
    2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
    After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                              2.67-      542.01
    Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
    I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
    Main issue is
    Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
    Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
    Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
    Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
    Thanks
    Sagar Chinchkar

    Dear Rajneesh,
    I have made the changes as suggested....
    It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
    I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
    Structure Z1
    Splitting structure for AT
    Assignment 10
    Electricity Cost
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    Cost Element
    994215
    Activity Type
    ELE30
    Splitting Rule
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    12
    Activity quantity
    Version 0
    In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
    Order 1 - QTY 2
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1
    Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
    followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
    KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
           QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
           (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
        3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
          Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
    Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
    Total -                    965.57
         4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
         LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10  to 0 
         DIE20 - Actual  confirmed Value 10  to 0
    Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                                  PL     Act     Var
    40002
    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    1005/1100000042
    10.00
    15.00
    50.00
    40015
    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
    1005/4400000074
    26.00-
    26.00-
    994201
    Depriciation Cost
    WMBDDEP01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994202
    Sales & Distribution Cost
    WMBDS&A01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994310
    Labour Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
    4.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994320
    Diesel Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
    10.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994330
    Electricity Cost
    CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
    2.00
    408.06
    20,303.00
    If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
    What setting is required in current system.....
    Million thanks in advance....
    Regards
    Sagar Chinchkar

  • MD50 With Collective order scenario

    Hi!,
    Can we have multi level sales order planning for collective order scenario without runnnng the multi level planning (MD02 / MD01) subsequently.
    Actually when we run MD50 system creates the planned order for header material but not for dependent requirements.
    I know that this can be done by subsequently running MD02 / MD01. Please let me know that whether is it possible in collective order scenario without running the maulti level planning.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards.
    Uday

    Hy Uday,
    Yes It is possible To generates Planing Proposals for dependent requirement also through MD50.But most imp conditions are, 
    - For all the BOM Components Ind./Coll requirement type(MRP4) should be maintain as individual requirements only (option 1) or individual or collective requirements.(Blank).
    - For Header Material - MRP for Dep. Requirements should be active in MRP 4 view.
    If above condition is maintain for BOM components then system will generates Planing proposals for all the BOM components upto the last level of BOM.
    For In house Production system will generates Plan order with reference to Sales order (HALB).
    And for externally procured Items system will create PR with Reference to Sales order.
    Regards,
    Dhaval
    Edited by: Dhaval Choksi on Aug 18, 2008 3:16 PM

  • Collective orders issue

    Hi Gurus,
    There is an issue with the collective orders for our client. For the child orders the Plan and actual are coming same. And for these child orders GI and activity booking is done but GR is done at the Parent order level.
    Pls tell me at this point how the plan and actual are equal for the child orders.
    Regards
    Dinaker

    I want to explain this more clearly.
    we are using collective orders and planning strategy 10.
    Say we need 1 roh to produce 1 halb
    and need 1 halb to produce 1 fert.
    target qty =100 say
    MRP run
    Production order qty for fert 100
    production order qty for halb 100
    purchase req qty for roh 100
    say GR for roh qty 50
    we confirmed qty of halb = 50 i.e:partially confirmed
    Now went to fert order and will be able to confirm 50.But this is not happening.User is able to confirm 100.
    we should be able to confirm only 50 since we have halb=50.
    How to restrict this.he should be able to confirm fert qty 50 since confirmed  halb qty is 50.
    Could  you please tell me what config setting i should do and where.
    thanks

  • SAP report showing sales orders on which pricing conditions have been chang

    Is there a SAP report that shows a list of sales orders on which pricing conditions have been changed.
    My knowledge is:
    Review pricing condition transaction data table (‘KONV’) helps is some way.

    Hi Ashish,
    I don't know any such a report, but I guess you can play arround with table CDPOS.
    Change doc. object = VERKBELEG
    Table Name = KONVC.
    Actually this will take lot of time.
    Thanks,
    Mandar

  • Error while updating the Actual Activity Prices

    Dear All,
    While calculating the Actual activity prices under test run (KSII) ,the system is calculating the prices correctly, but when I run the KSII after deselecting the test run ,the system is giving the following error message:
    Cost center EE04301000 activity type RWKHRS: costs exist although activity 0
    Message no. KP250
    Diagnosis
    The plan or actual activity for cost center EE04301000, activity type RWKHRS is 0. However, costs were planned or posted in period(s) 1.
    System Response
    The SAP System cannot calculate activity prices for this activity type as this would involve division by zero. The plan or actual costs are ignored in activity price calculation.
    Procedure
    Check activity price calculation in planning for activity type RWKHRS in cost center EE04301000 and the costs planned for period(s) 1.
    Activity Type Planning
    Primary Cost Planning
    For activity price calculation in actual, actual costs are allocated onto the activity type through splitting, although no activity posting was made on this activity type.
    The scenario is that we have 4 activity types and planned costs/activity qty for all the 4 activities and calculated plan prices and posted actual costs for all the four types. Production Order created and confirmed only 3 activities out of 4 activities. And when we calculate the Actual prices for all 4 activities the system is giving the above said message.
    Please suggest as how to solve this issue.  
    Regards
    Subbu

    Hi Subbu
    The error is very much justified.. If your actual qty for any act type is zero, then division by zero would yield an error during activity price calculatoin
    You need to ignore this error, if the zero qty for 4th act type is justified.. System would post act price for remaining 3 act types...
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • COGI error generated while collective order confirmation

    hi ALL, this is the real  task for all PP GURUS.
    the issue is related with collective order confirmation.
    client is using customised program ZPP_CONF to confirm the collective order which is based on the sap spro program CORUPROC.this include automatic goods receipt,backflush & actual cost update .as user use zpp_conf for confirmation all this actions happened in backgruond.
    now after using ZPP_CONF . the confirmation is not happening .instead of that it is going in COGI where they are getting a error massage which is as follows
    "You have no authorization for this transaction with movement type 101u201D
    this error continues for 10-15 minutes after doing refresh it goes. & confirmation happens.
    this is not happening for all orders but for 8 out of 10.
    users have proper authorisations.
    they have enough stocks in st. locn.
    they are loosing lot of time becuse of this.
    HOW CAN I RECTIFY THIS ERROR GURUS?
    when i search i found this is written in the CORUPROC documentation
    Incl. incorrect goods movement: Not only preselected but also incorrect goods movements that are usually processed with transaction COGI are  selected and processed. 
    VENKADESH

    Hi,
    The Program CORUPROC only can adjust the Errors in Goods movements. It can not handle the Table Locks..
    The Program CORUAFWP, can taek care of table locks also, apart from the Errors in Goods Movements.
    Refer below thread for similar type of problem..
    COGI errors
    Hope this helps..
    Regards,
    Siva

Maybe you are looking for