Collective orders settlement

Dear Experts,
Please advice how collective orders are settled.
I have tested and fouind that both child and header orders are to be settled individually but is there any possibility that if Header order is settled all the child orders are automatically settled.
Please explain the configuration steps to be folloewd to make auto settlement of child orders if parent order is settled.
Regards,
Krishna mohan

Dear Krishna mohan
their are 2 options to settle  collective orders, see question 4 in FAQ note 1574381.
Normaly if you set indicator "Coll.order with Goods Movement" in customizing for order type the system should automatically generate the settlement rules for child orders settle to header order. Did you try this way?
BR Sabine

Similar Messages

  • Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

    Hi Experts,
    I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
    Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
    1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing
    2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
    KKAO - Collective Processing
    3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
    KKS1 - Collective Processing
    4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
    CO88 - Collective Processing
    I am not able to do these steps.
    KGI2: the screen is appearing  without any details,but there is no error message.
    KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
    KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Dear,
    Message no KD256??
    You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
    Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
    Check this OSS note 179533
    Also check order previously settled?
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • How to trigger creation of collective orders

    Hi,
    How to trigger the creation of Collective orders.
    regards

    Hi,
    Collective Orders
    Use
    In a collective order, planned orders or production orders are linked to one another over several production levels. Each order in the collective order has its own order number. If subassemblies are produced directly for superior orders within a production process, without physically entering the warehouse, it is useful to have a representation via collective orders.
    The components for which separate production orders are created in the collective order are called directly produced components (see Creating Collective Orders)
    Prerequisites
    A collective order cannot be created for components that have one of the following indicators set:
    · Co-product
    · By-product
    · Alternative item with strategy 2
    · Alternative item with usage probability 0
    · Discontinued
    · Follow-up material
    · Intra material
    Features
    Collective orders offer the following advantages:
    · Integrated view of a production process
    Collective orders make it possible to represent different levels of the production process together in the system. The production process can be viewed as an integrated whole.
    · Separate order number for every order
    Every level in a collective order represents a separate production order/planned order. Every production order/planned order has its own order number. This enables you to process the entire collective order, a subtree in the collective order or an individual order.
    · No placements in storage or removals from storage between production levels
    Within a collective order stock movements only take place for the leading order (that is, the order that is at the highest production level) and not for directly produced components. This makes it easier to maintain the collective order in comparison with several individual orders. A further advantage is a more realistic representation of the costs of the production process, since subordinate orders can be directly assigned and settled to superior orders.
    · Business functions simultaneously for several orders
    Certain business transactions can be carried out simultaneously for several orders. Releasing an order that belongs to a collective order has the effect that all the hierarchically subordinate orders are released simultaneously.
    · Automatic change to dependent orders
    Changes to an order automatically affect dependent orders / components affecting orders. For example, if you change the order quantity in an order then
    ¡ the relevant quantity changes are automatically made to dependent orders
    ¡ the requirements quantity of the directly produced component is automatically changed.
    In the collective order, you also have the option of manufacturing directly produced material in a different plant to the planning plant.
    · Set status in leading order
    If you make changes in subordinate orders that have an affect on the status, then the system sets the corresponding status in the order header of the leading order in the collective order as follows:
    u2013 CFCO Confirmation in collective order
    u2013 GMCO Goods movements in collective order
    u2013 RLNE Release taken place in network
    In this way you are informed about changes in the whole collective order.
    · Reading master data
    You can copy the routing data and BOM data to the order again. You can find more information in Read master data.
    Example
    You want to produce a pump. The BOM for the pump contains a pressure regulating valve and a spiral casing. You want to enter these two components in separate production orders, but you do not want them to be posted to stock.
    You set the special procurement type to direct production in the material master record for the pressure regulating valve and the spiral casing, so that production occurs using a collective order.
    When you create a production order for the pump, a collective order is automatically created, which contains subordinate production orders for the pressure regulating valve and the spiral casing.
    Creation of Collective Orders
    Use
    Collective orders are only created if the special procurement type is set to direct production in the components for which the separate production orders are to be created (materials planning area in the material master).
    In the standard system, 52 is the special procurement type for direct production (that is, for components that are produced within a collective order).
    To create a collective order, you must use an order type with internal number assignment.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Internal order settle to another internal order

    dear all,
    for internal order group have 2 order,and i want to settle by hierachy:
    A order settle to B order,then B order settle to GL account, how to config the settlement rule for
    this 2 orders?
    this purpose is to simulate PS WBS/activity if internal order can be collect cost then settle to a final GL acct..

    maybe i have make more detail for my question:
    a  order group contain internal order A/B,and order B under A like follow structure:
    order group
      - order A
         -- order B
    order A have plan/actual revenue/cost
    order B only have plan cost
    the settlement is try to settle order group: as my RA key is set as POC way to calculate revenue/cost,
    the formula of POC = actual cost / plan cost * plan revenue
    so i want the settle result of this group = actual cost of A / plan cost of A+B * plan revenue of A
    now the settle result = actual cost of A / plan cost of A * plan revenue of A,not include plan cost of B
    how to make it possible?

  • Maintenance Order Settlement

    Hi SAP gurus.
    I have one Maintenance Order PM01, with Actual Costs. Now I want to settle this cost to the cost collecter.
    Here is the problem. In  SPRO I have defined a settlement rule where the default object type is a Cost Center.
    My plant has a lot of equipments, and some of them have cost-centers, and another ones have internal orders.
    When I try to settle the PM01 order to one equipment that has an internal order, the system returns an error, because of the SPRO definition.
    Is it possible to ask the system to search in equipment data master the cost colecter? For exemple, if in the master data is Cost Center, then the order settle that a cost center, if in master data we have one internal order, the PM01 order settle to that internal order.
    Thanks in advance.

    hi
    since you have maintained the CTR as your settlement receiver ,if the equipment does not have cost center then your settlement rule is not created automatically which is the main cause for error during settlement
    for avoiding the same you can make the settlement rule mandatory for release in IMG hence user will try to maintain the settlement receiver when releasing the order .you can proceed with settlement.
    Or check customer exit COOM0003  Customer function for automatic creation of settlement rules where with the help of technical people can fulfill your requirement.
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Internal Order Settled to AUC reverse process

    Dear Gurus,
    I had a hard time to think how to do the processes over and over again.
    The current process is:
    Every month the internal order (investment and real order)  will collect the expense on AUC and settle to the AUC.
    At the end of year, the AUC will be settled to Fix Asset by internal order settlement rules.
    Now what if the settled expense was not correct. For example, in 2009, I created the IO and settled the IO to AUC in several months. But in 2010, I found the expense in IO shall not be settled to AUC, the expense was only the overheads. ( The AUC was not settled to Fix Assets). Just like I wanna reverse the settlement in 2009.
    So it would be like this in a flow chart.
    IO-> AUC->FX
    Now I need to do this:
    AUC->IO->GL
    For IO->GL, I have figured out that I can change the settlement rule profile and make the GL account allowed.
    But for AUC->IO , I have no idea and almost burn my brain on it.
    Could you please help to throw light ?
    Emma

    Hi,
    I tried 2 write offs, please help to see whether I am doing right. Thank you!
    I tried to reverse the document but it was not allowed.
    I am thinking to post a document like the following:
    1. Doc in 2009
    50 8910000000 settlement AUC             2,964,800.00-        Order:C1BIC83002
    70 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00
    2. What I want to post:
    40 8910000000 settlement AUC         2,964,800.00      C1BIC83002
    75 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00-
    But it gave me an error when I enter the asset number.
    Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed
    Message no. AK005
    Diagnosis
    Asset   that is to be posted is an investment measure. You are not allowed to post transactions that affect acquisition value using the current transaction.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and transaction type 160.
    I am not sure which transaction type is correct.
    Emma.

  • Order settlement - OKG8

    Hi
    We have to do internal order settlement for 6 months, can i do the collective settlement in OKG8, if so can somebody help me to create the variant why are we using variant what values do we need to enter, is each variant for each order?
    Thank you
    Edited by: Nivi ram on May 5, 2008 8:14 PM

    I have done the settlement for two orders for the current period but I could not see the accounting document details as we can see in KO88 in detailed information, i can see only the information icon
    Thank you.
    Edited by: Nivi ram on May 5, 2008 9:12 PM

  • Collective Order Actual Activity Pricing

    Hi Gurus
    We are using collective orders for production orders. As you know collective processes are used for costing shared processes.
    Let me explain the problem with an example: Say, we have product A and B to be produced. These two have shared operations and costs will be collected via collective orders by Tcode mill_oc.
    The process is as below:
    Production order 1 for product A. - Normal production order - CO01
    Production order 2 for product B. - Normal production order - CO01
    Production order 3 for product A - Collective production order - mill_oc
    Confirmations are done for Order 3 during period. At the end of the period Order 3 is settled to Order 1 and Order 2 with certain proportions.
    Actual activity price is calculated via Tcode:KSII. During CKMLCP the system valuates activities (posting price differences) for Order 3 product, Product A only. It must be the case that Product A and Product B have to be revaluated.
    NOTE: Actual activity price is valuated in material ledger, rather in orders (not with CON2)
    Is there any OSS notes or solution for this problem? If there is huge activity price differences, all the value is posted to just one product, which is collective orders product, rather than both lower level orders' products.
    Thanks in advance for your replies.
    Ahmet

    Hi Ahmet,
    This is rather a problem of material ledger multi-level settlement than of activity pricing. Material ledger will pick up the actual activity price correctly and will use the difference against the former activvity price as multi-level price difference on the production process. The problem is, if there are multiple outputs coming out of the process, as is resulting of the order combination process, material ledger will by default search for a apportionment structure (for joint production) in the material master of the main (or original) output material. As nothing will be maintained there, all the differences will go to this material.
    You can overcome the situation by a BADI implementation of BADI cost_split. There should be an example implementation in your system (if you have the Mill Products add-on active, as is indicated because you use Mill_oc) that enables to distribute the price differences by quantity of the outputs of a process. If you don't find the example implementation I could provide it to you.
    best regards,
               Udo

  • Collective order problem

    Hi gurus:
          I having a problem  when I use collective order, discrible as below:
    When I do the confirmation for the last operation of the subordinate order, it does not trigger  the auto-GR and auto-GI to the parent order. What can be the possible reason?
          It worked well in past... 
          Further, the "Collective order with/without automatic goods movement" indicator is NOT set for the order type we using.
    BR
    Kevin

    Dear Vivek:
          Thanks for your kindly reply.  Is the tick box you metioned "Coll.order with...." ?
    If so, after I flagged it, new problem occur.
    The first problem is the settlement receiver of the child order is incorrect . Now , the receiver is the Semi-FG which should be the parent order.  But it was right before the change I made.
    Another problem is the auto-GR always hold by the system which I can find it in CO1P.  It worked well before the change
    Any clue?   Thanks.
    BR
    Kevin

  • Product Costs by Sales Order - Settlement Options?

    Hello All -
    I am trying to understand if I need to settle to a sales order (SDI) or directly to material (MAT) or to COPA (PSG).
    If i look at my sales order, it has item category ZPSF, which product costs by sales order configuration shows a requirement class ZKE.  ZkE has a valuation of M, which means separate valuation of reference to sales document/project.
    Does this mean I need to settle to sales order first?
    Then i run vA88 to settle sales order to copa?
    if ZKE valuation is blank, does that mean its not valuated?  I have read on other sap help pages that means it is valuated.  Please clarify.
    also, when does one directly settle to MAT? what scenarios?  this confuses me.
    Thanks!
    Emmas

    I'll give this a try. When working in a make-to-order environment there are 2 settings in the requirments class that you must consider in determining how to settle the costs (and maybe the revenue as well).  The first setting is the account assignment category.  In the standard system "E" is used to designate the sales order as a cost collector.  "M" is used to if you don't want the sales order to be a cost collector.  Whether the sales order is a cost collector or not will determine your settlement options. 
    The second critical field is the valuation setting.  If you set it to "M" then the stock assigned to the sales order will be valuated (by valuated I mean that once the goods are produced they will be held in inventory as sales order stock with a value).  If you leave the valuation field blank then the stock assigned to the sales order will be held in inventory without a valuation. 
    If the sales order is not a cost collector then the cost to manufacture the order will be collected in your production order and the settlement rule for the production order will be to the material you are producing.  Since the material has a valuation, the costs collected in the production will be reduced by the material's valuation once it is received into finished goods inventory.  Any remaining costs are settled to wip or variance based on the production order's status and the RA key and variance key settings.
    If you have set the sales order as a cost collector then the production order costs can either settle to the finished material or to the sales order.  If you are using valuated sales order stock you would normal have the costs settle to the material and the production order would behave very much like the previous example.  If you are not using valuated stock then you would need to settle the costs to the sales order and all the production costs would accumalte in the sales order.
    If you are using the sales order as a cost collector than you will probably want to settle the sales order as well.  During the sales order settlement you have the option of settling the cost and revenue assigned to the sales order to COPA.  The settlement profile along with the RA key assigned to the sales order controls how these are settled.

  • Internal Order settlement taking long .

    Hi all,
    We are doing the Internal Order settlement throught c088 and running it in the back ground processing.
    Somehow its taking very long ( few days and still running ) . Its not an ABAP issue as there are no competing jobs. This is being done in ECC 6.0.
    Any clue why the settlement is taking so long? any help will be useful.
    thanks so much.

    Hi,
    I hope you might have included more than 1000 Internal orders for collective settlement...this will cause for either ABAP run time error or long time for completion.
    Please limit your selection like 500,500,500 ....then it would work.
    Please check OSS note.532323 and 621934
    Regards, Velumani
    Message was edited by: Velumani Arunachalam

  • Collective order - manuell booking

    Hello all!
    Is there a way to use collective orders without automatic booking, but with manual booking.
    We like the idea of the linked production orders and the way it is handled. Our problem is,
    that we need the semi-finished goods on stock. So we have to book them with MIGO.
    Is there any other way to link the production orders and do physical bookings (like in every
    standard production order)?
    Thankful for all help,
    Barbara

    Hi,
    In a collective order, goods movements (GI & GR) are usually not required for assemblies that are directly produced.
    When u do the confirmation for Lower level order, Produed assemblies will be issued to Higher level order directly, so manual goods issue not possible for assemblies to Higher level order.
    U can confirm this, with Higher level order cost analysis after the confirmation of lower level order.
    So need not issue the produced assembly to higher level order using the MB1A.
    Only thing u have to activate Collective order with goods movements object  box for Order type at OPJH .
    For Lower level order (Assembly order ) good issue for procured components of assembly can be done using MB1A with MVt type 261.
    Dependencies :
    For collective orders without automatic goods movements you must take organizational measures to ensure that the WIP calculation and the settlement of orders are each carried out twice. You cannot carry out a variance calculation for collective orders without automatic goods movements. You cannot carry out a standard cost calculation for a collective order without automatic goods movements.
    You can find detailed information on collective orders in the document Cost object accounting -> Order-related Product Controlling.
    Thanks,
    Mohit

  • Collective Order good moviement 101 - 261 ( sub - order )

    Dear gurus,
    i inserted in the HALB component the special procurement (52) and the Type procurement = E
    I created a production order for the Material Fert and the system create a collective order .
    Order 0001 for the FERT material and the order 0002 for the HALB material.
    When we confim the order 0002 the system don't create a good moviment 101 for the HALB component  and the MD04 don't exist . In the production order 0002 the issue quantity is 5 pz but we don't see the stock in the MD04.
    I need to have the moviment 101 for the sub order . 
    How i can have this situation of good moviment ? You can tell me the example of movimentation for the collective order ?
    Where we can find the information of this collective order ?
    Thanks a lot
    Daniele Pistilli
    PP TEAM

    Dear,
    Within a collective order stock movements only take place for the leading order (that is, the order that is at the highest production level) and not for directly produced components. This makes it easier to maintain the collective order in comparison with several individual orders. A further advantage is a more realistic representation of the costs of the production process, since subordinate orders can be directly assigned and settled to superior orders
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Pavan

  • Service Order settlement

    Hi,
    I need to set-up settlement of a service order. Can anyone tell how to go about it? To which elements does usually a service order settles? Primary/Secondary, is secondary the how does it get posted to G/L ?
    Thanks,
    Pankaj.

    hi pankaj..
      Settlement takes place through settlement rules you have created for the order.The costs are initially collected on the order. They are then transferred to the settlement receiver (Fixed asset ,Cost center ,WBS element,Order ,G/L ccount ,Material ,Asset under construction etc)specified in the settlement rule.
    You can settle an order if:
    1.It is released
    2.It has the status Settlement rule created
    3.Costs collected for it have not yet been settled
    4.A business completion has not yet been performed for it
    Creating a Settlement Rule Manually
    Call up the order in change mode.
    Choose Settlement rule.
    The following cases can occur:
    If a settlement rule already exists for the order, you reach the screen Maintain Settlement Rule: Overview directly.
    Check the settlement rule.
    To change it, go to detail data on the Maintain Settlement Rule: Distribution Rules screen, where you can make additional entries.
    If a settlement rule does not yet exist for the order, you must first specify whether you want to maintain the settlement rule with or without the system proposal for the distribution rule. A screen appears where you can maintain the settlement rule.
    Make all the necessary entries on this screen.
    Return to the order and save it.
    I think this will help you
    kkumar

  • Order Settlement  (Ko88) Vs. Sales Order Settlement (VA88)

    We would like to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of Production Order Settlement versus Sales Order Settlement.
    What are the benefits between one and the other?
    Please advice,
    Thanks in advance,
    Rio

    Hello,
    Thank you for replying.
    We are an MTO Semiconductor manufacturing shop, High volume. somewhat repetitive but not frequent.
    We have two clients:
    Client 1 - Uses Standard Costing and Settles Production Orders to the Material itself.
    Client 2 - Uses Actual Costing and Settles Production Orders to Sales Orders (automatic) then Settles Sales Orders to Profitability Analysi.
    I'm hearing SAP does not recommend the process from Client 2 "Sales Order Settlement"  because of the high volume of sales documents. still can't confirm this.
    I would like to find out the following:
    What are the Pros and Cons of Production order Settlement vs. Sales Order Settlement.  
    What are the reasons why one type of settlement is chosen over the other?
    Also, I found some data from SAP Labs which relates to an Old Version of SAP, so I would like to know if this process is still current with Version 6.0
    "...Settlement of the production order to the sales order is normally not required.  The sales order item automatically picks up the cost incurred on the production order.
    The production order must only be settled when:
    - The production order is in a different company code than the sales order.
    - The production order is a collective order
         The sales order product  cost processing will only pick up the cost on the top-level of a collective order, so the costs of the lower-level production orders      must be settled to the highest level of the collective order..."
    Please advice,
    Rio

Maybe you are looking for