Collective Orders with GR & GI for sub-ordinate orders

Hello,
I am lookng for collective Orders where superior order and sub-ordinate ordes can be tagged together and at the sametime, I would like to GR for sub-ordinate Order which trigger Auto GI to superior Order. this feature is not available in collective orders.
why I am looking for GR execution is that GR quantity changes for sub-ordinate order from one order to another order always. it needs to be actual.
any work acound to satisfy this requirement?
Thanks
JK

Hi JK,
I have a doubt that whether this would be a business requirement. Say as per the BoM if there are 3 levels the last level was expected to be produced as 100 UoM but after production run the yield was 98 UoM or 105 UoM then how system will undertsand that it should post the GI of level 3 SFG2 as yield produced from the last Production/ Process order. But at the same time you need to do subsequent adjustment at SFG1 level also.
This is highly dynamic situation thats why when you have multiple level of BoM and at each stage the chances of yield variation is high then its always better to create Production/ Process order of superordinate level of BoM when the lower level are produced, confirmed and available in the stock.
Regards,
Shoyeb

Similar Messages

Help with font identification for subs?

Hi Everyone,
I have been struggling, as it seems many are with getting my subs to liik good in encore. I'm not expecting blu ray results, but something in the vein of this:
Can anyone identify the font or the settings? I love adobe products, but this has been a major pain in encore.
Many thanks,
howard

Hi Everyone,
I have been really woking with encore to deliver what I think looks like good subs. I have something here and I was curiosu about your opinions:
What do you all think? Is it too big? Does it look right? I have been playing with pretty much every setting and trying a million different fonts and sizes. How do they compare with the screen cap from above? Any feedback would be appreciated.
Do subs display differently from PAL to NTSC? Should I be using different style fonts for 16:9 or 4:3?
Many thanks,
howard

Create a tree with recursive call for sub-rows

Hello,
I would like to create a generated menu dynamically created from values returned by sql.
Structure is as follow :
Menu
|
+-- MenuItem <--+
         |        |
         +--------+I can't know the maximum depth of the menu.
How can I create a dynamic tree for ADF to display a tree or a hierarchical view properly without having to define a ViewLink / level ? (i.e. without hardcoding the maximum depth)
I created a simple Application Module with VO:
MenuVO
+ MenuItemVO (using VL1 between MenuItem and Menu)
      + SubMenuItemVO (using VL2 between MenuItem and MenuItem, father / child link)Using the Oracle BC Navigator to test this, I can see that a dynamic tree is available, how can I have it in a JSP page ?
Using the hierarchy viewer component it's possible, but how can I do this with an ADF Tree ?

You can easily create a recursive tree level rule on the MenuItemVO via a parent/child view link (get rid of SubMenuItemVO). Look at this example http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/learnmore/32-tree-table-from-single-vo-169174.pdf
The only difference is your recursion is going to be at MenuItemVO level.
Edited by: 948181 on 2012/07/31 4:07 PM

DOCUMENTED GOODS MOVEMENT FOR COLLECTIVE ORDER

Hi Guru's
In the 4.6C version
If i got to Production order from transaction code CO03 , Read the collective order , highlight the toplevel item and ''GOTO'' in the menu bar and select Documented goods movement , the display shows the Top level order AND the Sub-Assemblies.
( sub-assemblies goods movement with main assembly can be seen in the single screen)
In the ECC 6.0 Version
If i got to Production order from transaction code CO03 , Read the collective order , highlight the toplevel item and ''GOTO'' in the menu bar and select Documented goods movement , the display shows the Top level order only.
To see the Goods Movement in the Sub-Assemblies you have to go to each production order individually.
can this be changed in ECC 6.0 exactly to that seen in 4.6c version .
pls give me your valuable inputs at the earliest .
Thanks for your help.
Regards
satish k

Hi satish,
In collective order struture ,Automatic goods movement will be happened between toplevel & lower level.
Please check with "coll order goods mvt" settings for order type at OPJH For ECC 6.0 version.
Please also check with cost analysis for Goods movement.
Regards
Pradeep

Incorrect quantity updates of sub-order in collective order

Hi,
We are using Cable solutions ver: 4.6c. When the quantity of the leading order is changed (co02), the sub-order quntities are not changing accordingly. Let me explain you in detail.
Following are the settings in Material Master.
Material      BaseUoM      AsseblyScrap ProcurementType    SpecialProcurement   MatType
MAT1          FT                11.5%               E - inhouse                                                  FERT
MAT2          FT                                         E - inhouse               52 - Collective Order HALB
MAT3          LB                                         F - External               10 - consignment       ROH
Following is the BOM structure for Leading Material MAT1 with base qty 1000FT
Component      Qty     UoM
MAT2               1000 FT
Following is the BOM structure for MAT2 with base qty 1000FT
Component      Qty     UoM
MAT3               7.280 LB
If I create a production order for MAT1 with qty 1000 - system adds 11.5% scrap and the final qty = 1115 and at the same time it creates a production order for MAt2 with qty 1215 (this is another issue - it suppose to be 1115 but it adds 100 more, dont know why). Now if go to change mode and change the qty for MAT1 to 10000 then the target qty = 11150, but the Qty for for order of MAT2 = 5529 - which is incorrect, it is suppose to be around 11150.
One thing i noticed is - if Assembly scrap for MAT1 is removed in Material master then the Quantity of the MAT2 is updating correctly.
Anyone had this kind of issue before? Please let me know the solution to this problem.
Thanks in advance.

Is any one there who can help me on this problem. I am waiting.....
Thanks in advance

Automatic Sub Order confirmation in Collective Order

Hello, I am using collective order, and have the 'HEADER' order and all child orders released. Our requirement is that once the Main Header order is reported confirmed, ALL child production orders should be auto confirmed as well. (we could have MANY child orders under the header order). I tried using the OPKI setting for collective entry to 'Order Header' but it is greyed out in the change mode during config. Any thoughts will be much appreciated.

If you're doing the confirmation of parent order (leading order) at header level (meaning you use CO15) then you can only confirm that particular order and not any child order. If you want the child orders to be confirmed also after completely confirming you'd have to change the control key of last operation of routing in leading material as milestone and use CO11 or CO11N and just confirm the last operation, it will automatically confirm all the operations in the leading order and all the sub orders (child orders). I don't think your OPKI setting will solve the issue.
Production orders that belong to collective orders are generally confirmed like normal production orders. However, you should note the following:
    When you carry out a confirmation at header or suboperation level, you can only confirm the order concerned.
    When you confirm at operation level, you can confirm operations for all orders as long as you work with milestone operations or progress confirmations.
    When there is a confirmation in the collective order, the system sets the status CFCO (release occurred in network) at the header level of the leading order in the collective order.
If you want to read more than what I mentioned, you go to this link

Collective Order good moviement 101 - 261 ( sub - order )

Dear gurus,
i inserted in the HALB component the special procurement (52) and the Type procurement = E
I created a production order for the Material Fert and the system create a collective order .
Order 0001 for the FERT material and the order 0002 for the HALB material.
When we confim the order 0002 the system don't create a good moviment 101 for the HALB component and the MD04 don't exist . In the production order 0002 the issue quantity is 5 pz but we don't see the stock in the MD04.
I need to have the moviment 101 for the sub order .
How i can have this situation of good moviment ? You can tell me the example of movimentation for the collective order ?
Where we can find the information of this collective order ?
Thanks a lot
Daniele Pistilli
PP TEAM

Dear,
Within a collective order stock movements only take place for the leading order (that is, the order that is at the highest production level) and not for directly produced components. This makes it easier to maintain the collective order in comparison with several individual orders. A further advantage is a more realistic representation of the costs of the production process, since subordinate orders can be directly assigned and settled to superior orders
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Pavan

Business scenario for collective orders

Hello folks,
Can somebody explain the business scenario associated with collective orders? why we need collective orders? what is the business requirement that calls for collective orders?
Regards,
Sravan Kumar

You may create several production orders from several planned orders, provided that the planned orders exist in the same plant and belong to the same MRP controller. This is called collective order conversion.
A collective order is a linking together of planned orders or production orders over several manufacturing levels.
Every production order has its own routing and order number.
When you are in the collective order structure, you can edit an individual order, a subtree, or the entire collective order.
Goods movements are not required for sub-assemblies. The material is passed on directly to the next
order up.
The special procurement key determines whether direct production is involved.
Since no goods movements are required for sub-assemblies, this means that you have less data to maintain. Goods movements are only required for the leading order and for components whose special procurement key does not stipulate that direct production should be used.
Changes to dates and quantities affect all related orders.
The actual costs of the production process are more realistic because they are not influenced by the
predefined price in the material master.
Master Data.
Special procurement key "52" on MRP 2 view
Individual Collective Flag MRP4 view
Bills of material and routings at each assembly level
Any structure possible

Restricting Prod Orders for Sub assemblies.

H Gurus,
My client has a requirement of not to have any production orders for sub assemblies as there are lot of production orders to be taken care for production.
They need only one production order so that they will track w. r. t this production order .
Please help me which are the possible ways to meet this requirement.
Thanks in advance.
Naveen.

Hello,
if you set this indicator in MRP view, then planning itself will not happen for components. but doing this, how production of sub assembly will be taken care.
I guess question was about tracking of all production orders of assembly and sub assembly. Production orders needs to be there for both to meet the requirement in production.
Here, Collective Orders can be used.
You need to set "special procurement key" 52 for all the sub assemblies. now when planning will be done. it will be done at header as well as sub assembly level.
after conversion to production order, you can see header material order as collective order and sub assembly orders below it.
you can now track w.r.t Header material only, no need to track with sub assembly.
Please refer to SAP help http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a5/63198843a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
for collective orders
hope this resolve this query
regards
Amol

Swap between two different item categories in sales orders for sub-contracting

Dear gurus,
my requirement is to have the ability to swap between two different item categories for sales orders for sub-contracting.
This should be controlled by a combination of the material and a value maintained the Usage field in the Customer Material Info Record (for example by entering a ‘V’). A combination of Sales Doc Type, Item Cat Group and Usage should result in the creation of a purchase requisition.
In the event that a process order is required instead of a purchase requisition (i.e. the product is to be manufactured in-house instead of sub-contracted) the user must have the ability to change the Item Category within the sales order to produce a process order.
The user would just change the item category within the sales order, and the system would automatically remove the purchase requisition assigned to the SO, and create a process order and assign it to the SO.
Can you suggest any possible solution?
Thank you in advance.

Hi Majlo,
In my system, I checked. First created sales order with third party line item and then changed item category to normal item category.
Till Purchase order not created, I can change Item category of my sales order line item.
In this case SAP inform by log and once save delete purchase requisition of that line item .
For this you need to assign another item category as an manual item category in SPRO Item category assignment.
After this user can manually change item category to other one manually, if PO do not exist.
Please let me know if your query is different.
Regards

Goods receipt through Inbound delivery for Sub-Contracting Purchase order

Hi
I am trying to do goods receipt for the inbound delivery /shipping notification created for a sub -contracting Purchase order. The Finished product and the component part are batch managed, When I try to perform PGR in VL32N , I am getting a blank screen as error message and Goods receipt is not getting triggered . I checked for OSS note and found 645119 close to my issue but not an exact match . We are in ECC 6.0 with EHP 4. Can some one clarify whether it is possible to post GR through inbound delivery for a Subcon Purchase order .
Thanks in advance for your immediate response.
with regards,
Joseph Anand B

Hi, The issue may be due to this - the component is batch managed but the batch data is blank in the component list of the Purchase Order Item. Or a batch is maintained in the PO item component list but the stock for the same batch is not available with Vendor, i.e. stock with some other batch may be available.
In a receipt for Sub-cont PO, 101 happens for FG and 543 happens for component. But there is no option to provide the component details in a delivery. So in standard system, when 101 happens via a delivery, 543 will be posted in the background. So any error in posting 543 will result in a blank screen without any error message.
You can fix this by maintaining correct batch in the PO component list.
But there is another issue - you cannot do 'cancel posting' and 'return delivery' for this receipt. Only you can reverse the inbound delivery and you should know that the recevied stock shouldn't have been processed to do reversal of inbound delivery.

IW36 bdc is not updating CU tab for sub order

Hello Everyone,
I am facing one strange problem.
I am creating a Main work order using IW31 bdc and in the same program i run the IW36 bdc for sub order creation for the main WO created. In this case when I create a Main WO, CU tab gets updated with a default row.
When I keep the mode 'A' and check the BDC of IW36 it takes me to the CU tab sceen and updates the row same as in Main WO. and it creates the Sub Order.
But when I check the Sub Order using IW32 tcode, I dont find the updated row in CU tab .. rather I find it blank.
Please help me to find out why its happening and what should be the soultion..
Regards,
Pranil Shinde.

Hi Prabhu,
I didn't understand the meaning of analyzing the Pricing Procedure ?
In V/08, I have selected the Z condition type created in the system and than selecting that, navigated to CONTROL folder.
Now in front of the Z condition type in CALCULATION TYPE field the number of the routine is given (Which is created using VOFM).
Now what else I need to do?
Repy@Madhu.
Yes Madhu. Routine is activated and control is stopping if break point given in the routine. In this routine I am trying to populate a value in its XKOMV internal table's KBETR field but when VA01's main CONDITIONS TABS screen comes the value is not appearing.

How to create Purchase Order using sub-ordinate Purchase order number?

Hi,
I m in ETL product have to extract SAP datas into Access.
I noticed that in the Demo DataBase of OEC Computers,the Purchase Order is created with sub-ordinate purchase order number.But i am trying to create the same in SAP B1 manually,but i can't create child Purchase Order .
<b>How to create child Purchase Order?</b>
Please help me to create the same
regards
Sooriyakala.P

Hi,
I m in ETL product have to extract SAP datas into Access.
I noticed that in the Demo DataBase of OEC Computers,the Purchase Order is created with sub-ordinate purchase order number.But i am trying to create the same in SAP B1 manually,but i can't create child Purchase Order .
<b>How to create child Purchase Order?</b>
Please help me to create the same
regards
Sooriyakala.P

Merchandise Distribution Collective PO with SLS - Minimum Order Value

Hi,
My organisation is using Merchandise Distribution with SLS to generate collective PO's at our consolidation platforms before generating either STO's or PO to the supply source.
We're utilising Cross Dock and Flow Through to support our processes but in the case of Cross Dock, we're essentially asking the supply source to pick/pack the stock for the final recipient, therefore it can be quite an expensive process for the supply source (but clearly not for us).
Before we implemented this the supply source used to simply receive orders directly from the store and within this process we applied Minimum Order Values, as per my previous statement it can be expensive and picking a couple of small items for one store and having to put them on a pallet is not economical for them in either warehousing or transportation.
I'm looking for some broad suggestions on how this could be achieved whilst utilising collective orders.
Our store STO's generated by MRP (and soon enough F&R) are large STO's that are not truly supply source specific, they are consolidation platform specific and the collective orders generated off the back of them are supply source specific.
The key issue i see is that we're asking for a select group of lines within the store STO to meet an MOV of the vendor OR that we somehow ensure that the store STO's are supply source specific and then enforce some MOV logic.
Obviously this isn't standard but it's causing our organisation big supply issues, so any thoughts or advice would be fantastic.
Many thanks

Hi ,
You can not do directly in ME59N. Check for user exit for this t code.
Thanks,
Venkat

COOIS Capacity report for Collective Order

Hello Expert,
Need your help & assistance. I have an issue related to collective order, COOIS report display for list Capacity.
For one collective order, when I check this COOIS>Capacity report it display only header order detail, not for dependent order.
But for another collective order for same order type & Plant, it display for both header & dependent order.
Please find the attached word doc with screenshot for the steps I am following. Please point out the reason, that I can check so that for first order also it displays both header & dependent orders in the COOIS > Capacity list.

Case:01: Wherin COOIS>Capacity list display only show for header order not dependent order
Case 02:Wherin COOIS>Capacity list display show both for header order & dependent order
Order type & Plant is same in both cases.
For detail please check .xml attached
Regards
Piyush

Collective Orders with GR & GI for sub-ordinate orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for